Abstract
Acute full-thickness rotator cuff tears occur in previously asymptomatic patients who, after a specific traumatic event, experience sudden onset of pain and lack of active movement of the shoulder girdle. Acute, traumatic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears, with immediate weakness and pain, account for only 8% of those who present with symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Early diagnosis is challenging, and thus, the true prevalence and incidence are not completely understood. Tendon healing has been shown to be associated with better strength and functional outcome. Despite advances in surgical techniques, the rate of failure is still high; however, the majority of studies on the matter have shown that early surgical repairs seem to be related to better clinical outcomes.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Epidemiology
An annual incidence of acute full-thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCTs) is estimated to be 25 per 100,000 population aged 40–75 years old [1]. Furthermore, acute FTRCTs are common in the male population following simple falls [1]. While the overall average of FTRCTs is around the 60s, acute cuff tears due to a traumatic event can occur in younger ages, finding its mean age around 34 (Fig. 14.1) [2]. It is also suspected that there is a high risk of missed diagnosis, which could alter data collected until now. Most frequent injury pattern is a direct trauma, such as fall, often onto an outstretched arm [3].
2 Clinical Features
Patients with no signs of fractures or dislocations are often discharged from the emergency department with no further investigation. Only much later, the patient will be referred to a specialist if the disability and pain continue. Usually previously asymptomatic patients identify a traumatic incident leading to a sudden onset of symptoms such as severe pain, immediate loss of strength, and functional impairment of the shoulder. Missed diagnosis is also common because small lesions tend to be more painful than FTRCTs and pain seems to be related more to the degree of bursitis than to the degree of tearing [4].
3 Physical Examination
Traumatic lesions of the rotator cuff may often be missed on the first clinical examination because of minor physical findings dominated by pain. A detailed history and a proper clinical examination improve the early diagnosis of traumatic rotator cuff tears [5]. The clinical examination includes the assessment of passive and active range of motion, strength of the rotator cuff muscles, ability or inability to hold the arm in desired position (lag sign), and additional assessment of the subacromial impingement, acromioclavicular joint, and biceps tendon (Table 14.1). Additionally, since the pain following a traumatic event could influence the test performing, a subacromial injection of anesthetic (10 mL of 1% lidocaine) could be administrated to discriminate true positive lag signs from false positives due to sorrow.
4 Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging has previously been considered the most precise diagnostic tool for chronic cases of FTRCTs, but during the last decade due to further improvements in equipment and technique, similar results have been shown with sonography, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80 to 100% for both modalities [6]. Fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy are the most used patterns to evaluate prognosis, and clinical reports suggest that fatty degeneration and muscle atrophy seen with delayed surgery are related to lower postoperative scores, both UCLA and Constant score [7]. Acute FTRCTs often occur on a pre-injured tendon. The presence of fatty infiltration within the muscles of rotator cuff classified according to Goutallier gives us precious information about the type and chronicity of the injury (acute event on a pre-injury tendon versus acute event on a healthy tendon) and thus the long-term prognosis (Fig. 14.2).
5 Treatment Options
5.1 Nonoperative Treatement
There is support in the literature for the nonoperative management of rotator cuff tears. Bokor et al. reported that patients presenting for nonoperative treatment within 3 months of their injury had satisfactory outcomes [8]. Successful nonoperative management has been associated with the presence of satisfactory motion and strength at the initiation of treatment. Unfortunately, Itoi and Tabata have demonstrated that the outcome of nonoperative management deteriorates over time, and Goldberg et al. concluded that the overall response of shoulder function to nonoperative intervention was poor [9, 10].
5.2 Operative Treatement
It is well known how frictional attrition of the torn rotator cuff and musculotendinous tissues retraction are minimal immediately after injury [1]. Also scarring about the shoulder is not present, making early repair easier and more secure. Operative treatment is considered to be the first line of treatment in these types of lesions nowadays (Fig. 14.3). There is a trend suggesting that earlier time to surgery may be linked to better clinical results regarding Constant scores and range of motion [11]. While an agreement on precise timing for surgery has not been outlined yet, several studies support this theory [11,12,13,14].
Gerber et al. reported higher improvement in outcomes in the 13 patients who underwent surgery within 20 months of injury than the 3 patients whose surgeries were delayed more than 36 months after the injury [14]. A study by Petersen and Murphy noted that when compared with those performed longer than 16 weeks after injury, repairs performed prior to 16 weeks from injury were associated with significantly improved active elevation (140° vs. 100°), ASES score (81 vs. 65), and UCLA score [15]. The most comprehensive study, comparing outcomes between early and delayed repair, was conducted by Bassett and Cofield who determined that tendons repaired within 3 weeks had significantly better forward elevation and showed a trend toward better strength in both abduction and external rotation than those repaired after 3 weeks [12]. Additional support for this results has been published by Hantes et al., who reported significantly higher mean postoperative Constant (82) and UCLA (31) scores in the acute repair group (<3 weeks) than in the delayed repair group (70 and 26, respectively) [13]. Even if the precise guidelines for the timing of surgical treatment have not been defined yet, there are some clear data as to how delayed surgery could affect subjective and objective patient’s outcomes. Following this, it is undeniable that timely surgery is strictly recommended.
6 Summary
An agreement on relevance of timing on successful rotator cuff repair has not been completely defined yet; however, several studies suggest that earlier time to surgery may be linked to better clinical results. Immediately after traumatic tear, rotator cuff tendon retraction is minimal. Additionally, scarring about the shoulder is not present, making early repair easier and more secure. Important prognostic factors for the surgical treatment of these injuries are fatty degeneration and muscle atrophy of the relevant muscles as well. Clinical reports suggest that these changes seen with delayed surgery are related to lower postoperative scores. It is unlikely to see important grade of fatty degeneration and muscle atrophy after the injury. These changes might occur on a pre-injured tendon, thus giving us precious information about the type and chronicity of the injury like acute event on a pre-injury tendon. This observation is therefore important for the long-term prognosis.
References
Aagaard KE, Lunsjö K, Frobell R. Early repair of trauma-related full-thickness rotator cuff tears does not eliminate the problem of healing failure. Bone Jt J. 2019;101B:603–9.
Braune C, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Welsch F, Teufel M, Jaeger A. Mid-term results and quantitative comparison of postoperative shoulder function in traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:419–24.
Namdari S, Henn RF 3rd, Green A. Traumatic anterosuperior rotator cuff tears: the outcome of open surgical repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1906–13.
Fukuda H. Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a modern view on Codman’s classic. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9:163–8.
Sørensen AK, Bak K, Krarup AL, Thune CH, Nygaard M, Jørgensen U, Sloth C, Torp-Pedersen S. Acute rotator cuff tear: do we miss the early diagnosis? A prospective study showing a high incidence of rotator cuff tears after shoulder trauma. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:174–80.
Dinnes J, Loveman E, McIntyre L, Waugh N. The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:iii, 1-166.
Warner JJ, Parsons IM 4th. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer: a comparative analysis of primary and salvage reconstruction of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:514–21.
Bokor DJ, Hawkins RJ, Huckell GH, Angelo RL, Schickendantz MS. Results of nonoperative management of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;294:103–10.
Itoi E, Tabata S. Conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;275:165–73.
Goldberg BA, Nowinski RJ, Matsen FA III. Outcome of nonoperative management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(382):99–107.
Mukovozov I, Byun S, Farrokhyar F, Wong I. Time to surgery in acute rotator cuff tear. Bone Jt Res. 2013;2:122–8.
Bassett RW, Cofield RH. Acute tears of the rotator cuff. The timing of surgical repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;175:18–24.
Hantes ME, Karidakis GK, Vlychou M, Varitimidis S, Dailiana Z, Malizos KN. A comparison of early versus delayed repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1766–70.
Gerber C, Hersche O, Farron A. Isolated rupture of the subscapularis tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1015–23.
Petersen SA, Murphy TP. The timing of rotator cuff repair for the restoration of function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:62–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 ESSKA
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franceschi, F., Gregori, P., Franceschetti, E. (2020). Traumatic Cuff Tears: The Relevance of Timing. In: Sampaio Gomes, N., Kovačič, L., Martetschläger, F., Milano, G. (eds) Massive and Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61162-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61162-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-61161-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-61162-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)