Zusammenfassung
Als Grundprinzip wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens und wissenschaftlicher Praxis sind die Redlichkeit und die Transparenz anzusehen. Im Zuge einiger schwerwiegender Fälle wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens Ende der 1990er Jahre haben viele wissenschaftliche Fachgesellschaften und auch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) das Thema der guten wissenschaftlichen Praxis in den Fokus gerückt und Grundprinzipien zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis herausgegeben.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Vgl. hierzu Novellierung der Strahlenschutzverordnung mit neu hinzugekommenen Inhalten zur nichtionisierenden Strahlung (BMU 2019).
Literatur
BMU. (2019). Verordnung zum Schutz vor schädlichen Wirkungen nichtionisierender Strahlung bei der Anwendung am Menschen (NiSV) (Vol. Teil I Nr. 41). Bonn: Bundesanzeiger Verlag.
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., et al. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Clinical Radiology, 58(8), 575–580.
Chan, A. W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Altman, D. G., Laupacis, A., Gotzsche, P. C., Krle, A. J. K., et al. (2015). SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 38(6), 506–514.
DeAngelis, C., Drazen, J. M., Frizelle, F. A., Haug, C., Hoey, J., Horton, R., et al. (2004). Clinical trial registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Medical Journal of Australia, 181(6), 293–294.
DFG. (1998). Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
DFG. (2013). Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Dwan, K., Gamble, C., Williamson, P. R., Kirkham, J. J., & Reporting Bias, G. (2013). Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias – An updated review. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e66844.
Gagnier, J. J., Kienle, G., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Sox, H., Riley, D., et al. (2014). The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(1), 46–51.
Greco, T., Zangrillo, A., Biondi-Zoccai, G., & Landoni, G. (2013). Meta-analysis: Pitfalls and hints. Heart Lung Vessel, 5(4), 219–225.
Grifka, J., Feldmann, T., Hüttemann, K., Tillmann, B., & Meyer zu Tittingdorf, J. (2018). Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis. Konkretes Vorgehen bei Veröffentlichungen. Forschung und Lehre, 25(10), 874–877.
Groves, T. (2008). Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research. BMJ, 337, a718.
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., et al. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348, g1687.
Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Stewart, L., & Tierney, J. (2007). Time to publication for results of clinical trials. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews (2), MR000011.
Institut für Neue Materialien. (2016). Guideline of INM – Leibniz Institute for New Materials (INM) for safeguarding good scientific practice and handling accusations of scientific misconduct. Saarbrücken: INM.
Joober, R., Schmitz, N., Annable, L., & Boksa, P. (2012). Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome? Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 37(3), 149–152.
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., et al. (2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c869.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269, W264.
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251.
Raspe, H., Hüppe, A., Strech, D., & Taupitz, J. (2012). Empfehlung zur Begutachtung klinischer Studien durch die Ethikkommission. Köln: Deutscher-Ärzte-Verlag GmbH.
Rohrig, B., du Prel, J. B., Wachtlin, D., & Blettner, M. (2009). Types of study in medical research: Part 3 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 106(15), 262–268.
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c332.
Seto, K., Matsumoto, K., Kitazawa, T., Fujita, S., Hanaoka, S., & Hasegawa, T. (2017). Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE instrument: comparison between data obtained from AGREE I and AGREE II. BMC Research Notes, 10(1), 716.
Sterne, J. A., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., et al. (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 343, d4002.
Stevanovic, A., Coburn, M., & Rossaint, R. (2015). Mindestanforderungen an qualitativ hochwertige Berichte medizinischer Forschungsergebnisse. Der Anaesthesist, 64(12), 903–910.
Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G. D., Rennie, D., et al. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(15), 2008–2012.
Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 181.
Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., et al. (2007). Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), W163–194.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194.
Ziegler, A. (2009). Reporting guidelines for research: Curse or blessing? Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 134(41), 2077.
Ziegler, A., & König, I. R. (2011). Guidelines for research reports: An application of CONSORT 2010 statements. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 136(8), e2–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pieter, A., Kemmler, W., Mayerl, J., Fröhlich, M. (2020). Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis. In: Einführung in die Methoden, Methodologie und Statistik im Sport. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61039-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61039-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-61038-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-61039-8
eBook Packages: Life Science and Basic Disciplines (German Language)