Keywords

1 Introduction

The North China Craton (NCC) is one of the largest cratons in the eastern Eurasian continent with a total area of 300,000 km2. It has a triangular shape and is surrounded by young orogenic belts in the north and south, and faces the Pacific Ocean in the east. The major tectonic structures are cut off by the craton boundary, and this suggests that the NCC is a fragment of a once larger craton (Li et al. 2000). It is one of a few areas on the Earth where >3.8 Ga rocks have been identified (Liu et al. 1992; Song et al. 1996; Wan et al. 2005a, 2012a). Rocks older than ca. 2.6 Ga occur widely in the craton (Fig. 1). The NCC is characterized by strong late Neoarchean tectono-thermal events (Shen et al. 2005; Wan et al. 2011a; Zhai and Santosh 2011), and this makes it different from several other cratons worldwide, providing a chance for better understanding the tectonic property of the Archean/Proterozoic boundary. Similar to other cratons, 80–90 % of the continental crust of the NCC may have formed in the Archean.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Simplified sketch map showing distribution and zircon ages for the early Precambrian rocks in the North China Craton. Also shown are the locations of rocks and zircons of >2.6 Ga and Figs. 2, 3, 9, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 26, 28, 29, and 31. YS Yinshan; HA Huai’an; ZJK Zhangjiakou; HS Hengshan; WT Wutai; FP Fuping; LL Lüliang; ZH Zanhuang; ZT Zhongtiao; JZ Jiaozuo; DF Dengfeng; XQL Xiaoqinling; LS Lushan; CD Chengde; MY Miyun; EH eastern Hebei; WL western Liaoning; SL southern Liaoning; NL northern Liaoning; SJ southern Jilin; WS western Shandong; ES eastern Shandong; HQ Huoqiu; BB Bengbu. Blue triangle rock age; red square detrital or xenocrystic zircon age

The Archean rocks are covered in many areas by Paleo- to Neoproterozoic sedimentary sequences deposited into major basins such as the Songliao basin, North China basin, and Ordos basin. Furthermore, several events since the Paleoproterozoic modified the original features of the Archean basement, including (1) Paleoproterozoic tectono-thermal events that resulted in strong reworking of Archean crust and overprinted the original geological relationships; (2) long-term erosion destroyed part of the Archean basement; and (3) craton destruction since the Mesozoic was mainly related to deep crustal processes but also influenced the shallow crust. All these modifications make it difficult to comprehensively understand the Archean geology of the NCC. Nevertheless, geoscientists carried out geological, petrological, geochronological, and geochemical studies in almost every Archean area of the craton. Research was also undertaken on rock samples recovered from drill cores that penetrate into basement beneath some sedimentary basins and on Archean enclaves brought up from the deep crust by young igneous rocks. In view of all these new data, the main features of the Archean basement of the NCC have become better understood although significant debates still occur as indicated by different tectonic models (e.g., Kusky and Li 2003; Wu et al. 1998; Zhai and Santosh 2011; Zhao et al. 2002, 2005; Zhao 2014).

The NCC has a long history of geological studies, and some specific case studies carried out in the last century laid important foundations for later work (e.g., Bai et al. 1986, 1996; Cao et al. 1996; Cheng et al. 1982; Li et al. 1986; Lu et al. 1996; Qian et al. 1985, 1994; Shen et al. 1990, 1992, 1994a, b, 2000; Sun et al. 1984; Sun and Hu 1993; Wu et al. 1989, 1998; Zhang et al. 1988; Zhao et al. 1993). Since the beginning of this century, numerous papers were published on Archean rocks and their evolution, and in this chapter, we try to synthesize present knowledge by first outlining the general geological records of the Archean basement and then discussing several important issues relating to Archean crust formation and evolution.

2 Archean Geological Record

2.1 Eoarchean (>3.6 Ga)

Rocks older than 3.8 Ga have been discovered in only a few areas worldwide such as northern Canada (Bowring and Williams 1999; O’Neil et al. 2007), eastern Antarctica (Black et al. 1986), West Greenland (Kinny 1986; Nutman et al. 1996), and around Anshan city in the NNC (Liu et al. 1992; Song et al. 1996; Wan et al. 2005a, 2012a). Anshan is located southwest of the Anben (Anshan-Benxi) area where 2.5 Ga BIF-bearing supracrustal rocks (the Anshan “Group,” we use the word group with quotation marks to indicate that it does not conform to modern stratigraphic terminology but constitutes a tectono-stratigraphic term) and granitoids (mainly syenogranites) occur widely (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Geological map of the Anben (Anshan-Benxi) area, North China Craton. Modified after LBGMRE (1975a, b, 1976); Wan (1993), and Wan et al. (2015a). Triangle in inset map shows location of Fig. 2 in the NCC

In Anshan, 3.8 Ga rocks occur within three complexes, namely the Baijiafen, Dongshan, and Shengousi complexes (Fig. 3). Baijiafen quarry was the site where 3.8 Ga rocks were first discovered (Liu et al. 1992). The complex is ~700 m long and ~50 m wide in exposure and extends in a NW–SE direction, in tectonic contact with the 3.3–3.1 Ga Chentaigou granite in the southwest and 3.36 Ga Chentaigou supracrustal rocks in the northeast (Wan et al. 2005a; Wan unpublished data). It is mainly composed of strongly mylonitized trondhjemitic gneiss of different ages with some biotite schist, gneissic monzogranite, and quartz diorite (Fig. 4). In an early study, all granitoids of the complex were considered to have formed at 3.8 Ga (Liu et al. 1992), but later studies indicated that these rocks formed at different times ranging from 3.8 to 3.1 Ga (Liu et al. 2008). The 3.8 Ga mylonitized trondhjemitic gneiss occurs in narrow layers such as sample A0518 (Fig. 5a) that is distinguished from the surrounding rocks (also trondhjemitic gneisses) by containing less biotite. The biotite schist (Fig. 5b) varies in thickness between a few centimeters and half a meter and alternates with igneous units, including trondhjemitic gneiss. There are two opinions on the origin of the schist, namely an altered mafic dike (Song et al. 1996) or a metasedimentary rock (Liu et al. 2008). The latter is based on the observation that the schist is interlayered with chert that is composed of recrystallized quartz with some banded biotite + epidote aggregates. However, at some localities, quartz veins occur together with biotite schist; therefore, the “chert” may, in fact, be a deformed quartz vein. Although it is uncertain whether the biotite schist is derived from a mafic dike or a supracrustal rock, it is considered to be older than 3.6 Ga because it is cut by 3.62 Ga trondhjemitic gneiss (Fig. 5b). Some younger magmatic rocks (samples A0405, A0517, A0521) contain xenocrystic zircons with ages of 3.8–3.6 Ga.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Geological map of the Anshan area (Wan et al. 2012a). BC Baijiafen Complex; DC Dongshan Complex; SC Shengousi Complex

Fig. 4
figure 4

Photographic mosaic showing studied section of the Baijiafen Complex with sampling sites marked (Liu et al. 2008). Samples with prefix 05FW are from Wu et al. (2008)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Field photographs of Eoarchean rocks in the Anshan area. a 3.80 Ga mylonitized trondhjemitic gneiss (A0518), Baijiafen Complex; b biotite schist (A0403) intruded by 3.62 Ga trondhjemitic gneiss (A0404), Baijiafen Complex; c 3.81 Ga banded trondhjemitic gneiss (Ch28) intruded by trondhjemitic and pegmatitic veins, Dongshan Complex; d 3.79 Ga meta-quartz diorite (A9604) occurring in 3.79 Ga banded trondhjemitic gneiss (A0507), Dongshan Complex; e 3.68 Ga banded trondhjemitic gneiss (A0423) intruded by pegmatitic vein, Dongshan Complex; f 3.77 Ga banded trondhjemitic gneiss (A0512), Shengousi Complex

Rocks of the Dongshan Complex trend approximately WNW–ESE (Fig. 3), and the exposure is more than 10 m wide and up to 1000 m long. It occurs as a large enclave within the 3.14 Ga Lishan trondhjemite and is cut by veins derived from the Lishan trondhjemite intrusion. Different types of 3.8–3.1 Ga rocks have been identified in the complex, including banded trondhjemitic gneiss, gneissic trondhjemite, gneissic monzogranite, pegmatite, meta-ultramafic rock (komatiite?), amphibolite (metabasalts or gabbro), and meta-quartz diorite. These units are mostly structurally concordant to each other because of strong ductile deformation, and their original contact relationships are often difficult or impossible to recognize. Rocks older than 3.6 Ga were identified in three locations, including 3.81–3.68 Ga banded trondhjemitic gneisses and 3.79 Ga meta-quartz diorite. The 3.81 Ga banded trondhjemitic gneiss (sample Ch28, Fig. 5c) near a pavilion was first identified in the complex (Song et al. 1996). 3.79 Ga meta-quartz diorite (sample A9604) occurs as a small enclave within the 3.79 Ga banded trondhjemite (sample A0507) in an outcrop near the southeastern end of the Dongshan Complex (Fig. 5d). The identification of 3.68 Ga banded trondhjemitic gneiss (sample A0423, Fig. 5e) indicates that there are Eoarchean banded trondhjemitic gneisses of different ages in the complex although they are similar in field appearance and composition (Liu et al. 2008).

The Shengousi Complex is located between the Dongshan and Baijiafen complexes, and its full extent is unknown due to poor exposure and is only readily apparent in a deep road cut (Wan et al. 2012a). The key locality is a ~50 m-long and up to ~10 m-high section on an elevated bench in this road cut (Fig. 6). The complex comprises polyphase migmatites, and despite a strong structural overprint through ductile deformation, there are small areas of lower strain where the relative chronologies between the different migmatite components are preserved. The youngest component on the basis of field relationships is a pegmatitic monzogranite dike. Eight samples were collected for zircon dating in this section, and these samples revealed a protracted tectono-magmatic history from 3.77 to 3.13 Ga with the oldest rocks being 3.77 Ga banded trondhjemitic gneisses (sample A0512, Fig. 5f). The complex mainly contains monzogranite and mafic metamorphic rocks besides trondhjemitic rocks of different ages (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Photographic mosaic showing the section of the Shengousi Complex in the Anshan area (Wan et al. 2012a)

The above three complexes are similar in their geochronological record. Apart from >3.6 Ga gneisses, 3.45–3.0 Ga rocks have been identified. Many >3.6 Ga rocks notably contain younger (mainly 3.3 Ga) zircons. Some authors considered this as evidence that the trondhjemitic gneisses formed at 3.3 Ga and contained numerous 3.8 Ga zircon xenocrysts (Wu et al. 2008). However, based on field observations, zircon morphology, and cathodoluminescence (CL) images, a better explanation may be that these granitoid gneisses predominantly constitute strongly deformed igneous injection migmatites containing igneous components of several ages and/or are related to anatexis of 3.8 Ga rocks at 3.3 Ga (Liu et al. 2008; Nutman et al. 2009; Song et al. 1996; Wan et al. 2012a). There is no doubt that the 3.79 Ga quartz diorite identified in the Dongshan Complex is magmatic in origin, as indicated by its geological, petrological, and compositional features, although it also contains younger zircons (Wan et al. 2005a). Some of the <3.6 Ga rocks in the three complexes that do not show banded structures or strong deformation also contain old zircon xenocrysts (Fig. 7). All ~3.8 Ga gneisses are trondhjemitic in composition with high SiO2 and Na2O, and low ΣFeO (FeO + 0.9 × Fe2O3), MgO, CaO, and K2O. They have very low total rare earth element (REE) contents, positive or negligible Eu anomalies, and weakly fractionated REE patterns (Fig. 8a).

Fig. 7
figure 7

3.64 Ga xenocrystic zircon core occurring in 3.33 Ga magmatic zircon from gneissic trondhjemite (A0711) in the Shengousi Complex, Anshan

Fig. 8
figure 8

Chondrite-normalized REE patterns for Archean rocks from the North China Craton. a 3.8 Ga trondhjemitic rocks in Anshan; b 3.0–2.9 Ga Tiejiashan K-rich granite in Anshan; c 2.75–2.7 Ga TTG rocks in the North China Craton; d 2.53–2.50 Ga syenogranite in the North China Craton. Data are from Jahn et al. (2008), Wan et al. (2005a, 2007, 2011b, 2012a, b, 2014a), Yang et al. (2013), and Zhu et al. (2013)

Many >3.6 Ga detrital and xenocrystic zircons were also discovered in the Gongchangling and Waitoushan areas (Fig. 2) (Wan 1993; Wan et al. 2015a). This suggests that Eoarchean rocks may occur in a wider area of Anben than currently identified. The single zircon age of 4.17 Ga reported by Cui et al. (2013) from an amphibolite (metabasalt) of the 2.5 Ga Anshan “Group” in Waitoushan is questionable after rechecking the original LA-ICP-MS data (Diwu personal communication).

Eoarchean rocks within relatively large areas in the NCC have so far only been identified in the Anben area. However, abundant Eoarchean zircons were discovered in rocks of the Caozhuang Complex, eastern Hebei Province. This complex is composed of amphibolite- to granulite-facies granitoids and a supracrustal sequence (Fig. 9). The supracrustal sequence is composed of Bt-Pl-Qtz ± Sil and Bt ± Grt gneisses, amphibolite, marble, calc-silicate, fuchsite quartzite, and banded iron formation (BIF) and was considered to have an age of 3.5 Ga on the basis of a Sm–Nd isochron age for amphibolites (Jahn et al. 1987). However, the Sm–Nd isochron was later interpreted as a mixing line (Nutman et al. 2011). The oldest rocks identified in the area are 3.4–3.3 Ga granitoid gneisses (Nutman et al. 2011; Liu unpublished data). Detrital zircons with ages of 3.88–3.55 Ga were reported from the Caozhuang (fuchsite) quartzite (Liu et al. 1992; Nutman et al. 2011; Wilde et al. 2008; Wu et al. 2005a). Recently, Liu et al. (2013b) carried out SHRIMP dating on detrital zircons from para-amphibolite and Grt-Bt gneiss and obtained detrital core ages ranging from 3.8 to 3.4 Ga and metamorphic rim ages of ~2.5 Ga. Combining the detrital zircon data of the three rock types, age peaks at ~3.83, ~3.67, 3.55, and ~3.41 Ga can be recognized (Fig. 10), suggesting that detrital material was derived from crustal sources of different ages. Based on zircon morphology and inclusion studies, Nutman et al. (2014) suggested that the Caozhuang quartzite is most likely a <3.5 Ga immature sedimentary rock of local provenance. This interpretation strengthens the case for Eoarchean rocks with a substantial 3.88–3.80 Ga component occurring in eastern Hebei Province and indicates that the paragneiss protoliths of the Caozhuang Complex were deposited between 3.4 and 2.5 Ga ago (Liu et al. 2013b; Nutman et al. 2014).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Simplified geological map of the Caozhuang area, eastern Hebei. Modified after Chen (1988), Liu et al. (2013a), and Nutman et al.(2011). Triangle in inset map shows location of Fig. 9 in the NCC

Fig. 10
figure 10

Age histogram for zircons from metasedimentary rocks (including fuchsite quartzite, para-amphibolite, and metapelitic rock) in the Caozhuang area, eastern Hebei. Metamorphic zircon ages of 2.5 Ga have been identified only in para-amphibolite and metapelitic rock. Data are from Liu et al. (1992, 2013a), Nutman et al. (2011), Wilde et al. (2008), and Wu et al. (2005a)

Rocks and zircons older than 3.6 Ga have also been identified elsewhere in the NCC (Fig. 1), including 3.65 Ga felsic granulite enclaves in Mesozoic volcanic rocks of the Xinyang area (Zheng et al. 2004a) and ≥3.6 Ga detrital zircons in the Zhongtiao and Dengfeng areas (Liu et al. 2012a; Zhang et al. 2014a). Interesting is the discovery of three 4.1–3.9 Ga xenocrystic or detrital zircons, together with younger Archean and Paleoproterozoic grains, in Paleozoic volcano-sedimentary rocks of the northern Qinling Orogenic Belt (Diwu et al. 2010a, 2013, personal communication; Wang et al. 2007). One zircon has a 3.71 Ga overgrowth rim (Fig. 11), suggesting a tectono-thermal event at that time in the zircon source region. The volcanic rock is located near the southern margin of the NCC, and the old zircons are considered to be derived from the NCC basement (Diwu et al. 2013; Wan et al. 2009a).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Cathodoluminenscence image showing 3.71 Ga overgrowth rim on 4.08 Ga xenocrystic or detrital zircon from pyroclastic rock in the Paleozoic Caotangou Group in northern Qinling, near the North China Craton (from Diwu et al. 2010a, b). Circle and dashed circles refer to SHRIMP and LA-ICPMS dating locations, respectively

2.2 Paleoarchean (3.6–3.2 Ga)

Paleoarchean rocks and components have been identified in many areas of the NCC and reflect the most important tectono-magmatic events in Anshan as indicated by their distribution and zircon age histogram (Fig. 12). The 3.36 Ga Chentaigou supracrustal rocks near Baijiafen (Fig. 3) are the oldest supracrustal rocks identified in the NCC. Their formation age is limited by 3.36 Ga felsic metavolcanic rocks in the sequence and 3.34–3.31 Ga trondhjemitic veins intruding the sequence (Fig. 13a, b) (Song et al. 1996; Wan unpublished data). The main rock types include amphibolite, meta-ultramafic rocks, felsic metavolcanic rock, meta-calc-silicate, fuchsite quartzite, and iron-bearing chert (Fig. 13c, d). The meta-ultramafic rocks occur over a relatively large area in the northeastern exposure of the sequence, and their protolith was uncertain (volcanic or intrusive) in early studies. They are intruded by 3.31 Ga trondhjemitic veins (Fig. 13b) and are considered to belong to the sequence. They are similar to komatiites in chemical compositions with MgO contents up to 38 %, but no spinifex textures have been identified because of strong modification. The amphibolite is tholeiitic in composition, showing a flat REE pattern with no large ion lithophile element (LILE) enrichment. This is the main reason for the speculative interpretation that these supracrustal rocks formed in an arc environment (Wan et al. 1997a).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Age histogram of zircons from Archean rocks in the Anben area. Data are from Liu et al. (1992, 2008), Song et al. (1996), Wan et al. (2005a, 2007, 2012a, b, d, 2015a, unpublished data), Wu et al. (2008), Yin et al. (2006), and Zhou et al. (2007, 2009)

Fig. 13
figure 13

Field photographs of Paleoarchean rocks in the North China Craton. a 3.36 Ga felsic meta-volcanic rock (the Chentaigou supracrustal rocks) intruded by 3.25 Ga trondhjemitic vein, Anshan; b meta-ultramafic rock (the Chentaigou supracrustal rocks) intruded by 3.31 Ga trondhjemite vein, Anshan; c fuchsite quartzite in the Chentaigou supracrustal rocks, Anshan; d iron-bearing chert in the Chentaigou supracrustal rocks, Anshan; e 3.45 Ga trondhjemitic gneiss in the Shengousi Complex, Anshan; f 3.31 Ga gneissic trondhjemite and 3.33 Ga meta-mafic rock in the Shengousi Complex, Anshan; g 3.4 Ga gneissic quartz diorite, Huangbaiyu, eastern Hebei; h 3.29 Ga gneissic trondhjemite, Huangbaiyu, eastern Hebei

The oldest Paleoarchean rock is a 3.45 Ga trondhjemitic gneiss in the Shengousi Complex (Fig. 13e). It is considered to have interacted with Eoarchean trondhjemitic rocks nearby to form an injection migmatite that subsequently underwent strong deformation to produce a rock with layers of different ages (Wan et al. 2012a). Igneous rocks of 3.35–3.2 Ga widely occur in the Anshan area, including the Baijiafen, Dongshan, and Shengousi complexes. The rock types are metagabbro, metadiorite, meta-quartz diorite, granite, as well as trondhjemitic gneiss (Dong et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2008; Wan et al. 2001, 2012a; Zhou et al. 2007, 2009). It is common that different rocks with similar or different ages occur within a single outcrop (Fig. 13f). The Chentaigou granite was considered to be the largest pluton formed at ~3.3 Ga (Song et al. 1996). However, Wu et al. (2008) obtained ~3.3 and ~3.1 Ga zircon ages for three Chentaigou granite samples near the Baijiafen Complex and thought the latter to represent the emplacement time of the pluton. Based on geological mapping and zircon dating, Li et al. (2013) suggested that the Chentaigou granite is composed of 3.3 and 3.1 Ga granitoid rocks. Trondhjemitic rocks in the Anshan area, between 3.45 and 3.3 Ga in age, show a significant variation in REE composition from very low ΣREE contents and weakly fractionated REE patterns to high ΣREE contents and strongly fractionated REE patterns (Wan unpublished data).

In Caozhuang, eastern Hebei Province, 3.4 Ga quartz dioritic gneiss and 3.3–3.2 Ga tonalitic gneiss (Fig. 13f, g) occur as enclaves within 2.5 Ga granite (Nutman et al. 2011; Liu unpublished data). This is the second area where Paleoarchean igneous rocks were identified in the NCC. Based on the youngest detrital zircons at 3.55 Ga from a fuchsite quartzite and the oldest TTG rock at ~3.3 Ga in the area, Wan et al. (2009a) suggested that deposition of the Caozhuang Complex supracrustal rocks occurred between 3.55 and 3.3 Ga. However, the relationship between the supracrustal rocks and the ~3.3 Ga TTGs is uncertain. Based on the metamorphic zircon age of 2.5 Ga and the believable youngest detrital zircon age of 3.4 Ga of the metasedimentary rocks (Fig. 10), we can now only limit deposition to between 3.4 and 2.5 Ga. Mainly based on zircon dating, Han et al. (2014a) concluded that the supracrustal rocks in Xingshan, ~1.5 km northwest of Huangbaiyu, that belong to the Caozhuang Complex, were deposited at 3.39 Ga. However, the dated rock contains garnet and many 3.76–3.43 Ga zircons, similar in features to the metasedimentary rocks in Huangbaiyu. Therefore, it is possible that the 3.39 Ga zircon is detrital in origin, and this age therefore only constrains the upper depositional age of the Caozhuang supracrustal rocks.

The age distribution of >3.3 Ga detrital zircons from the Caozhuang Complex is similar to that of magmatic zircons in the Anshan area (Figs. 10 and 12). However, it appears that the detrital material was derived from the surrounding area, rather than Anshan, which is too far from Caozhuang.

Paleoarchean detrital and xenocrystic zircons were identified in many areas of the NCC such as Alax, Guyang, Wutai, Jiaozue, Dengfeng, Zhongtiao, eastern Shandong, and Bengbu (Fig. 1) (Diwu et al. 2008; Gao et al. 2006; Ji 1993; Jian et al. 2012; Jin et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2012a; Shen et al. 2005; Wan et al. 2006, 2009a, c, 2010a; Wang et al. 1998; Xie et al. 2014a; Zhang et al. 2014a, b).

2.3 Mesoarchean (3.2–2.8 Ga)

Mesoarchean rocks are more widespread in the NCC than Paleoarchean rocks. In Anshan, large Mesoarchean intrusive bodies include the 3.14 Ga Lishan trondhjemite, the 3.0 Ga Dong’anshan granite, the 3.0–2.9 Ga Tiejiashan granite, and part of the 3.3–3.1 Ga Chentaigou granite (Fig. 3). The Tiejiashan granite (Fig. 14a) is the oldest and largest K-rich granite pluton in the NCC (Wan et al. 2007; Wu et al. 1998) and occupies a total area of >150 km2 (Fig. 2). The rocks vary in their REE fractionation patterns but have high ΣREE contents and strong negative Eu anomalies (Fig. 8b). The Tiejiashan granite contains supracrustal xenoliths such as BIF and quartzite (Fig. 14b, c). There are also some mica–quartz schists (Fig. 14d) that were considered to be supracrustal enclaves (Yin et al. 2006). However, they show similar geochemical features as the Tiejiashan granite, and the so-called detrital zircons in the rocks are mainly ~3.0 Ga in age. In some thin sections, K-feldspar grains occur at different sizes in the fine-grained sericite + quartz groundmass. These features suggest that sericite resulted from strong deformation and alteration of K-feldspar during shearing. Therefore, we suggest that at least some schists are due to strong deformation and alteration of granite. Besides the large Mesoarchean granitoid bodies, many small Mesoarchean granitoid bodies or veins also occur in the Baijiafen, Dongshan, and Shengousi complexes (Figs. 4, 6 and 14e, f).

Fig. 14
figure 14

Field photographs of Mesoarchean rocks in the North China Craton. a Mesoarchean Tiejiashan K-rich granite, Anshan; b BIF in Mesoarchean Tiejiashan K-rich granite, Anshan; c quartzite in Mesoarchean Tiejiashan K-rich granite, Anshan; d mica–quartz schist in Mesoarchean Tiejiashan K-rich granite, Anshan; e 3.13 Ga augen-like granitic gneiss in the Baijiafen Complex, Anshan; f 3.14 Ga trondhjemite and 3.14 Ga monzogranite, Dongshan Complex, Anshan; g ca. 3.2 Ga gneissic tonalite, Huangbaiyu, eastern Hebei; h 2.94 Ga anatectic granitoid, Huangbaiyu, eastern Hebei

In Caozhuang, eastern Hebei Province, Mesoarchean igneous rocks have also been discovered (Fig. 14g, h) (Nutman et al. 2011), but they only occur on a very small scale. However, Mesoarchean xenocrystic zircons are more widespread.

In eastern Shandong, 2.9 Ga rocks are widely distributed, extending from Mazhuanghe in the west to Hexikuang in the east, with some occurring in the southern portion of the area (Fig. 15). Most of the so-called Mesoarchean Tangjiazhuang “Group” consists of intrusive rather than supracrustal rocks. Only a few 2.9 Ga supracrustal rocks, named Huangyadi supracrustal rocks, occur on a small scale within 2.9 Ga igneous rocks (Jahn et al. 2008). Mesoarchean supracrustal rocks in eastern Shandong are much smaller in scale than thought before (BGMRSP 1991). At least three types of 2.9 Ga igneous rocks, namely quartz diorite, tonalite, and high-Si trondhjemite, have been identified (Jahn et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2011, 2013a; Wang et al. 2014a; Wu et al. 2014; Xie et al. 2014b). Of these, tonalite seems to be the most common, with a total area up to several tens of square km. 2.9 Ga gneissic tonalite occurs in the lower part along a ~200 m-long road cut northeast of Zhoujiagou. It is in contact with 2.9 Ga gneissic high-Si trondhjemite in the upper part; both show strong deformation with their foliations parallel to each other (Fig. 16a–c). At the Hexikuang reservoir dam, 2.9 Ga gneissic quartz diorite occurs as enclaves within 2.9 Ga gneissic tonalite, and these show a differently oriented foliation (Fig. 16d). Felsic veins in the quartz diorite are parallel to the foliation and are considered to be anatectic products. Both the gneissic quartz diorite and tonalite contain ca. 2.5 Ga metamorphic or anatectic zircon, and the gneissic tonalite around the enclave shows strong deformation and anatexis. It seems likely that the quartz diorite enclaves were rotated after leucosome formation during the ca. 2.5 Ga tectono-thermal event (Xie et al. 2014b). 2.9 Ga gneissic tonalites exhibit strong anatexis with trondhjemitic leucosomes and biotite-rich melanosomes in local outcrops (Fig. 16e). Some leucosome forms layers and lenses at different scales and is strongly or weakly deformed. Anatexis occurred syntectonically in a regime locally changing from compression to extension at the end of the Neoarchean because 2.5 Ga metamorphic or anatectic zircons have been identified.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Geological map of eastern Shandong. Shown also are locations of zircon dating samples, and ages in parenthesis are magmatic zircon age or magmatic zircon age/metamorphic zircon age. Data are from Jahn et al. (2008), Liu et al. (2011), Liu et al. (2011, 2013a, 2014), Liu et al. (2013b), Liu et al. (2014), Shan et al. (2015), Tang et al. (2007), Wang and Yan (1992), Wang et al. (2014a), Wu et al. (2014), Xie (2012), Xie et al. (2013, 2014b), and Zhou et al. (2008). See Fig. 1 for location of the figure in the NCC

Fig. 16
figure 16

Field photographs of Mesoarchean rocks in the North China Craton. a 2.9 Ga gneissic high-Si trondhjemite (top) in contact with gneissic tonalite (bottom), Qixia, eastern Shandong; b 2.9 Ga gneissic tonalite, local enlargement in figure a; c 2.9 Ga gneissic high-Si trondhjemite, local enlargement in figure a; d relationship between 2.91 Ga gneissic quartz diorite and 2.91 Ga gneissic tonalite, Qixia, eastern Shandong; e 2.91 Ga gneissic trondhjemite, Qixia, eastern Shandong; f 2.84 Ga amphibolites showing banded structures, Lushan, Henan; g anatectic veins in 2.83 Ga gneissic tonalite, Lushan, Henan

2.8 Ga supracrustal rocks and TTGs have been identified in the Lushan area on the southern margin of the NCC (Fig. 17). These rocks are mainly composed of (garnet-bearing) amphibolite, hornblende–plagioclase gneiss, and biotite–plagioclase gneiss. Some amphibolites show a layered structure (Fig. 16f), mainly due to variations in plagioclase and hornblende contents. They occur as enclaves within TTG rocks with strong deformation and local anatexis (Fig. 16g). Zircon dating of the supracrustal rocks and TTGs yielded 2.83 Ga magmatic ages and two sets of metamorphic ages at 2.79–2.77 and 2.67–2.64 Ga (Liu et al. 2009a). Huang et al. (2010) performed zircon dating on TTG-like and TTG rocks in the same area and interpreted the ages of 2.77 and 2.72 Ga as the time of crystallization of the host igneous rocks. Similar conclusions were arrived at by Diwu et al. (2010b). However, the dated zircons exhibit strong recrystallization and overgrowth, and it is therefore likely that these are ~2.8 Ga TTG rocks that underwent strong metamorphism in the early Neoarchean. More work is required to identify whether or not there are ~2.7 Ga rocks in the area.

Fig. 17
figure 17

Simplified geological sketch map of the Lushan area, southern margin of the North China Craton. Modified after Liu et al. (2009c). Triangle in inset map shows location of Fig. 17 in the NCC

Mesoarchean detrital and xenocrystic zircons were discovered all over the NCC such as Alax, Guyang, Wutai, Fuping, Dengfeng, eastern Hebei, Huoqiu, western Shandong, and eastern Shandong (Fig. 1) (Jian et al. 2012; Kröner et al. 1988; Shen et al. 2004, 2005; Wan et al. 2006, 2010a, b; Wang et al. 1998, 2014a, b, c, d, e; Zhang et al. 2014a, b).

2.4 Neoarchean (2.8–2.5 Ga)

2.4.1 Early Neoarchean (2.8–2.6 Ga)

Two magmatic events can be recognized in the Neoarchean crust formation and evolution, namely an early Neoarchean event (2.8–2.6 Ga) and a late Neoarchean event (2.6–2.5 Ga). 2.80–2.76 Ga rocks are rare, and the most important tectono-thermal event is 2.79–2.77 Ga metamorphism recorded in the Lushan area near the southern margin of the craton (Liu et al. 2009a). The identification of widespread ~2.7 Ga rocks is one of the most important discoveries made in recent years. These rocks are widespread, including western Shandong, eastern Shandong, Guyang, Fuping, Hengshan, Zanhuang, Zhongtiao, and Huoqiu (Fig. 1) (Cao et al. 1996; Dong et al. 2012a; Du et al. 2003, 2005, 2010; Guan et al. 2002; Han et al. 2012; Jahn et al. 2008; Jiang et al. 2010; Kröner et al. 2005a; Lu et al. 2008; Wan et al. 2010b, 2011b; Wang et al. 2014a, b, c, d, e; Wang et al. 2009a, b; Yang et al. 2013a, b; Zhu et al. 2013).

In eastern Shandong, the spatial distribution of 2.7 and 2.9 Ga rocks is uncertain. However, they show close spatial relationships with 2.7 Ga rocks occurring extensively in a southwest to northeast direction with a total area of >100 km2 (Fig. 15). These Archean rocks underwent strong upper amphibolite- to granulite-facies metamorphism at the end of the Neoarchean (Jahn et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2011; Wu et al. 2014; Xie et al. 2014b). Similar to 2.9 Ga rocks, the 2.7 Ga assemblages exhibit strong deformation and anatexis with neosome material occurring in local outcrops (Fig. 18a). This makes it difficult to distinguish between 2.9 and 2.7 Ga assemblages. At present, the only way to identify these different rocks is by zircon dating.

Fig. 18
figure 18

Field photographs of early Neoarchean rocks in the North China Craton. a 2.7 Ga gneissic tonalite showing anatexis, Qixia, eastern Shandong; b cutting relationship between 2.71 Ga gneissic tonalite and 2.71 Ga gneissic granodiorite, Taishan, western Shandong; c 2.71 Ga gneissic tonalite showing anatexis and deformation, Taishan, western Shandong; d meta-komatiite with fine spinifex structures, Sujiagou, western Shandong; e amphibolite with pillow lava structures, Qixingtai, western Shandong; f deformed pillow lava in amphibolite, Qixingtai, western Shandong; g carbonate + siliceous material occurring at the end of deformed pillow lava in amphibolite, Qixingtai, western Shandong; h 2.69 Ga gneissic tonalite showing anatexis, Xi Ulanbulang, Yinshan

In western Shandong, Wan et al. (2010c, 2011b) divided the Archean basement into three belts (Fig. 19), namely a late Neoarchean belt of crustally derived granitoids in the northeast that predominantly consists of 2.53–2.49 Ga monzogranite and syenogranite (Belt A), an early Neoarchean belt in the center that is mainly composed of 2.75–2.60 Ga TTGs and supracrustal rocks (Belt B), and a late Neoarchean belt of juvenile rocks in the southwest that is dominated by granodiorite, gabbro, quartz diorite, and tonalite, with minor monzogranite and syenogranite (Belt C). Western Shandong is an area where 2.75–2.7 Ga rocks are most widely distributed in the NCC. Different types of ~2.7 Ga TTGs can be observed in contact with each other in Belt B, showing similar or different styles of deformation (Fig. 18b, c). Furthermore, western Shandong is the only area where early Neoarchean supracrustal rocks have so far been identified in the NCC. In an earlier study, the Taishan “Group,” including the Yanlingguan, Liuhang, and Shancaoyu “Formations,” were considered to be early Neoarchean in age (Cao et al. 1996). However, more recent studies established that only the Yanlingguan “Formation” and the lower part of the Liuhang “Formation” formed during the early Neoarchean (named the Yanlingguan-Liuhang succession). They are mainly composed of amphibolite and metamorphosed ultramafic rocks. Some of these rocks contain fine spinifex textures (Fig. 18d). Amphibolites with abundant pillow structures are abundant (Fig. 18e), and some show strong deformation (Fig. 18f, g).

Fig. 19
figure 19

Geological map of western Shandong. Modified after Wan et al. (2010c). Belt A A late Neoarchean crustally derived granite belt in the northeast that consists predominantly of 2.525–2.49 Ga monzogranite and syenogranite; Belt B An early Neoarchean belt in the center which is mainly composed of 2.75–2.60 Ga TTG and supracrustal rocks; Belt C A late Neoarchean belt of juvenile rocks in the southwest that is dominated by granodiorite, gabbro, quartz diorite, and tonalite, with some monzogranite and syenogranite. Triangle in inset map shows location of Fig. 19 in the NCC

Xi Wulanbulan is the only area where 2.7 Ga tonalite was identified in the Western Block of the NCC. It extends in a north–south direction over an area of >10 km2 (Fig. 20) and shows strong metamorphism, deformation, and anatexis (Fig. 18h) with metamorphic zircons recording an age of ~2.5 Ga. These tonalities occur together with the late Neoarchean Xinghe “Group” and other TTG rocks (Dong et al. 2012a; Ma et al. 2013a, b, c).

Fig. 20
figure 20

Geological map of the Xi Ulanbulang area, Yinshan. Modified after Dong et al. (2012a) and Ma et al. (2013). Triangle in inset map shows location of Fig. 20 in the NCC

Wan et al. (2014a) summarized the spatial distribution, rock types, geochemistry, and Nd–Hf isotopic compositions of ~2.7 Ga granitoids in the NCC. They are mainly tonalitic in composition and show large variations in SiO2, ΣFeO, MgO, and CaO. They can be subdivided into two types in terms of REE contents (Fig. 8c). Whole-rock Nd and Hf-in-zircon isotopic compositions indicate that the strong 2.7 Ga tectono-thermal event mainly involved juvenile additions to the continental crust with recycling of older crust only in local areas.

Ca. 2.6 Ga rocks were also reported in several areas of the NCC, including western Shandong, Hebi, Zhongtiao, Guyang, and Bayan Obe (Fan et al. 2010; Jian et al. 2012; Wan et al. 2015b; Zhang et al. 2012a, b, c, d, e, f; Zheng et al. 2012; Ma unpublished data). In most of these areas, ~2.7 Ga rocks also occur. Western Shandong is the area where both 2.7 and 2.6 Ga rocks are widely distributed (Wan et al. 2015b). They mainly occur together in Belt B (Fig. 21) and include hornblendite (meta-pyroxenite), gneissic tonalite, gneissic trondhjemite, and gneissic granite (Fig. 22a–d). Geological records are almost continuous from 2.75 to 2.59 Ga (Fig. 23). Ca. 2.6 Ga metamorphism and anatexis have also been identified (Du et al. 2003, 2005; Lu et al. 2008; Ren unpublished data). This strong tectono-thermal event resulted in the formation of migmatites in Belt B (Fig. 22e–f). These are important for considering 2.6 Ga as the boundary between the middle to early Neoarchean and late Neoarchean (2.6–2.5 Ga) in western Shandong. No ~2.7 Ga metamorphism and ~2.6 Ga supracrustal rocks have been identified there, and it appears that there was a “quiet period” between 2.60 and 2.56 Ga. We speculate that this time subdivision is applicable to the entire NCC.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Geological map of the Taishan-Mengjiatun area, western Shandong (Wan et al. 2015b)

Fig. 22
figure 22

Field photographs of early Neoarchean rocks in western Shandong. a 2.60 Ga hornblendite, southwest of Qixingtai; b 2.66 Ga gneissic tonalite, Yishan; c gneissic trondhjemite cutting amphibolite, Taishan; d relationship between 2.60 Ga gneissic granodiorite and 2.60 Ga mylonitized monzogranite, Xintai; e 2.7 Ga gneissic tonalite showing anatexis at ~2.6 Ga, Taishan; f 2.7 Ga gneissic tonalite showing anatexis at ~2.6 Ga, Taishan

Fig. 23
figure 23

Zircon age variation diagram (with error bars) for early to middle Neoarchean magmatic rocks in western Shandong. Data are from Du et al. (2003), Jiang et al. (2010), Lu et al. (2008), and Wan et al. (2011b, 2015b)

2.4.2 Late Neoarchean (2.6–2.5 Ga)

2.59–2.57 Ga rocks and metamorphism are rare. However, a 2.56–2.5 Ga tectono-thermal event is very strong, resulting in extensive distribution of supracrustal and intrusive rocks and metamorphism of this age all over the NCC (Chen 2007; Cheng et al. 2004; Cui et al. 2013, 2014; Dai et al. 2012, 2013; Dong et al. 2012b; Geng et al. 2002, 2006, 2010; Grant et al. 2009; Guo et al. 2005, 2008; Han et al. 2014a, b; He et al. 2005; Jahn et al. 1988; Jian et al. 2012; Kröner et al. 1998, 2005a, b; Li et al. 2010a, b, 2012; Liu et al. 2002, 2004a, 2007, 2009b, 2011, 2012a, 2012b; 2012c, 2014, 2011a; Lu et al. 2008; Lü et al. 2012; Ma et al. 2012, 2013a, b, c; Ma et al. 2013a, b, 2014a, b; Peng et al. 2012; Peng 2013; Peng et al. 2013; Ren et al. 2011; Shen et al. 2004, 2005, 2007; Shi et al. 2012; Song et al. 2009; Sun et al. 1991, 2010, 2014; Sun and Guan 2001; Tian et al. 2005; Wan et al. 2005b, 2009b, c, 2010b, c, 2011a, c, 2012b, c, d, 2015a; Wang et al. 2004, 2011; Wang et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2009; Wilde et al. 2004a, 2005; Wu et al. 1998; Xiang et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2008, 2009, 2011; Yang 2013; Zhai et al. 2000, 2005; Zhang et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2012a; Zhang et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2002, 2009; Zhao et al. 2008; Zhao et al. 2008; Zhou et al. 2009, 2011, 2014).

There are abundant Neoarchean (mainly 2.55–2.5 Ga) detrital and xenocrystic zircons in younger rocks and river sands (e.g., Diwu et al. 2012; Wan et al. 2011a). Late Neoarchean supracrustal rocks are mainly composed of mafic to felsic granulite, amphibolite, fine-grained biotite gneiss (leptinite), banded iron formation (BIF), and (fuchsite) quartzite, with the metamorphic grade ranging from predominantly amphibolite to granulite facies. Mafic granulite and amphibolite show light REE enrichment or flat REE patterns and are commonly rich in LILE and depleted in Nb and Ta (Wan et al. 1997b). Fine-grained biotite gneisses generally show compositional features of dacitic rocks. Late Neoarchean intrusive rocks are variable in composition, ranging from ultramafic to felsic, but TTGs and crustally derived granites constitute the main components. It is not until the late Neoarchean that granodiorites are widely distributed in the NCC. Syenogranites predominantly formed between 2.53 and 2.49 Ga and can be further subdivided into two phases with most showing massive structures and emplacement during the second phase (2.52–2.48 Ga), whereas the first phase (2.53–2.52 Ga) syenogranites show metamorphism and deformation (Wan et al. 2012b). All syenogranites share the same major element compositions, being high in SiO2 and low in CaO, ΣFeO, MgO, TiO2, and P2O5. However, they have variable REE compositions and can be subdivided into three types (Fig. 8d). In order to better understand the late Neoarchean geological features in various parts of the NCC, several areas are described below.

(1) Western Shandong

Late Neoarchean magmatism is widespread with peak ages of 2.53–2.52 Ga (Fig. 24). A recent study indicated that the Shancaoyu “Formation” and the upper part of the Liuhang “Formation” formed during the late Neoarchean rather than in the early Neoarchean (Wan et al. 2012c). Western Shandong is the only area where both early and late Neoarchean supracrustal rocks were identified. The late Neoarchean supracrustal rocks occur in different belts and mainly consist of meta-conglomerate, fine-grained biotite gneiss, fine-grained two-mica gneiss, mica schist, BIF, and felsic metavolcanic rocks. The metaconglomerates are interlayered with fine-grained biotite gneiss (Fig. 25a), and the conglomerate pebbles vary in size and mainly consist of TTG, monzogranite, and fine-grained felsic volcanic rocks. Some fine-grained biotite gneisses show sedimentary structures such as bedding (Fig. 25b), suggesting a clastic origin. However, in many cases, their protoliths are difficult to determine (volcanic or sedimentary) because of strong metamorphism and deformation (Fig. 25c). Mantle-derived igneous rocks in Belt C predominantly consist of gabbro, diorite, tonalite, and granodiorite. Magma mixing can be observed between different rock types (Fig. 25d, e). Different migmatite types are associated with crustally derived granites in Belt A as a result of anatexis of early supracrustal and granitoid rocks. TTGs of early and late Neoarchean ages were identified as protoliths of the anatectic rocks (Figs. 22b and 25f).

Fig. 24
figure 24

Age histogram of zircons from Neoarchean rocks in western Shandong. Data are from Du et al. (2003), Jiang et al. (2010), Lu et al. (2008), Wan et al. (2010c, 2011b, 2015b), and Wan (unpublished data)

Fig. 25
figure 25

Field photographs of late Neoarchean rocks in western Shandong. a Metaconglomerates interlayered with metasediments; pebbles are mainly TTG and felsic volcanic rocks, upper part of Liuhang “Formation,” Huamawan; b metasedimentary rock showing bedding, Shancaoyu “Formation,” Qixingtai; c mylonitized fine-grained biotite gneiss (S0801) of Shancaoyu “Formation,” Panchegou; d magma mingling between ~2.5 Ga granodiorite and quartz diorite, showing large variations in proportion, southeast of Tianhuang; e magma mingling between ~2.5 Ga syenogranite and quartz diorite, southeast of Tianhuang; f 2.52 Ga gneissic tonalite showing anatexis, Yinshan

(2) Eastern Hebei

Late Neoarchean supracrustal and intrusive rocks are widespread (Fig. 26), apart from ancient crustal components documented by 3.88–3.40 Ga detrital zircons and 3.40–2.95 Ga orthogneisses in Huangbaiyu, as mentioned before. 2.55–2.53 Ga tonalites and quartz diorites are most important in the west, and 2.53–2.51 Ga granites are most important in the east, where magma mingling between granite and diorite has been also identified (Fig. 27a) (Nutman et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2008).

Fig. 26
figure 26

Geological map of eastern Hebei, modified after Nutman et al. (2011). For location in the NCC, see Fig. 1

Fig. 27
figure 27

Field photographs of late Neoarchean rocks in eastern Hebei. a Magma mingling between ~2.5 Ga granite and diorite, Beidaihe; b anatexis of granulite-facies gneiss (the Zunhua “Group”), north of Santunying; c metaconglomerate at the bottom of the Zhuzhangzi “Group,” southeast of Qinlong; d anatexis of TTG rock, west of Anziling

The Qian’an “Group” was considered to be Mesoarchean in age, but recent zircon dating indicates that most of the supracrustal rocks formed at the end of the Neoarchean (Han et al. 2014a; Zhang et al. 2011; Wan, unpublished data). Late Neoarchean supracrustal rocks commonly occur as enclaves of variable sizes in granitoids and show spatial variations in rock association, metamorphism, and deformation, with metamorphic grades varying from granulite facies in the west to lower amphibolite facies (epidote amphibolite facies) in the east and greenschist facies in local areas. These rocks have different names in different areas (Fig. 26). The Zunhua and Qian’an “Groups” and associated TTG rocks in the Zunhua-Santunying area underwent granulite-facies metamorphism and were commonly affected by amphibolite-facies retrogression. The supracrustal rocks extend in a north–south direction and are mainly composed of biotite–plagioclase gneiss, hornblende–plagioclase gneiss, two-pyroxene granulite, amphibolite, meta-ultramafic rock, and BIF. Strong metamorphism resulted in anatexis of the supracrustal rocks (Fig. 27b).

The Luanxian “Group” occurs in the Luanxian-Lulong area and is composed of fine-grained biotite gneiss, amphibolite, and BIF, whereas at Huangbaiyu, the Qian’an “Group” and Luanxian “Group” are separated by a ~2.5 Ga granite. The Dantazi and Zhuzhangzi “Groups” at Qinlong exhibit lower amphibolite-facies metamorphism. The Dantazi “Group” (or Shuangshanzi “Group”) is dominated by fine-grained two-mica gneiss, garnet–mica schist, two-mica quartz schist, mafic and felsic metavolcanic rocks, and BIF. It is covered unconformably by the Zhuzhangzi “Group” (or Qinglong “Group”), commonly with >100 m of conglomerate at the base (Fig. 27c). Furthermore, the Zhuzhangzi “Group” contains fine-grained two-mica gneiss, fine-grained biotite gneiss, mica schist, quartz schist, biotite–hornblende schist, and BIF. Ca. 2.5 Ga BIFs are well developed in eastern Hebei and contain important iron deposits. The supracrustal rocks in the Qinlong area commonly underwent lower amphibolite-facies metamorphism, but the TTG rocks east of Qinlong show strong anatexis and deformation (Fig. 27d). In the eastern coastal area of Hebei Province, weakly deformed 2.53–2.51 Ga granites occur together with subordinate granodiorites, diorites, and magnesian gabbros and contain slightly older Neoarchean granitoid inclusions.

Nutman et al. (2011) suggested that Neoarchean magmatism in eastern Hebei was not a single protracted event but was marked by temporally, geographically, and geochemically distinct pulses of igneous activity at 2.55–2.535, 2.53–2.52 Ga, and 2.50–2.49 Ga, respectively, with the latter accompanied by granulite-facies metamorphism.

(3) Fuping-Wutai-Hengshan

This is an important and famous exposure of Neoarchean rocks in the NCC with a long history of research. Based mainly on the work of Cheng et al. (2004), Guan et al. (2002), Han et al. (2012), Kröner et al. (2005a, 2005b, 2006), Li et al. (2010a), Liu et al. (2002), Liu et al. (2004a), Miao (2003), Qian et al. (2013), Trap et al. (2007, 2008), Wan et al. (2010a), Wang et al. (2010), Wei et al. (2014), Wilde et al. (2004a, 2004b, 2005), Wu et al. (1989, 1998), Zhang et al. (2006); Zhang et al. (2006); Zhang et al. (2007, 2009), and Zhao et al. (2011), some common features of the basement are summarized as follows (Fig. 28).

Fig. 28
figure 28

Geological map of Hengshan-Wutai-Fuping, modified after Miao (2003), Cheng et al. (2004), Liu et al. (2004b), Li et al. (2010a, b), Zhao et al. (2011), and Qian et al. (2013). Triangle in inset map shows location of Fig. 28 in the NCC. The Yuanfang “Formation”(I) of the Fuping “Group” is mainly composed of anatectic biotite–plagioclase gneiss, hornblende–biotite plagioclase gneiss, and fine-grained biotite–plagioclase (two feldspar) gneiss (leptinite), and some of them may be metamorphic igneous rocks; Yuanfang “Formation”(II) of the Fuping “Group” is composed mainly of amphibolite, fine-grained garnet–biotite gneiss, fine-grained feldspar gneiss, fine-grained hornblende gneiss, banded iron formation, calc-silicate rock, and marble

  1. (1)

    The early Precambrian basement is composed of the Fuping Complex in a southeastern belt, the Wutai Complex in a central belt, and the Hengshan Complex in a northwestern belt. All of these are composed of intrusive and supracrustal rocks of different ages.

  2. (2)

    Early Precambrian intrusive rocks mainly formed during the late Neoarchean (2.55–2.5 Ga), including TTGs (mainly tonalite and granodiorite) with some monzogranite and K-rich granite. 2.2–2.0 Ga intrusive rocks occur on a relatively small scale and are predominantly crustally derived granites with a few mantle-derived mafic–ultramafic rocks. Early Neoarchean (~2.7 Ga) TTGs and early Neoarchean and older detrital and xenocrystic zircons were also identified in the Fuping and Hengshan areas.

  3. (3)

    No early Neoarchean or older supracrustal rocks have so far been found, but this does not mean that they do not occur in these areas. Late Neoarchean supracrustal rocks in the Wutai area are composed of mafic to felsic metavolcanic and clastic metasedimentary rocks, BIF, and minor limestone (the Wutai “Group”). In Fuping, late Neoarchean supracrustal rocks, named the Fuping “Group,” are mainly composed of mafic to intermediate metavolcanic and clastic metasedimentary rocks and minor BIF and marble. Some or many biotite–plagioclase gneisses and hornblende–plagioclase gneisses of the Suojiazhuang-Yuanfang unit I of the Fuping “Group” may be strongly metamorphosed and deformed intrusive rocks (Yang, unpublished data). Late Neoarchean supracrustal rocks rarely occur as enclaves in the Hengshan Complex, including garnet-bearing biotite–plagioclase gneiss, BIF, and amphibolite. High-pressure garnet two-pyroxene granulites are derived from gabbroic dikes.

  4. (4)

    In Wutai, the Gaofan “Group,” originally named as the Gaofan “Subgroup” of the Wutai “Group,” unconformably overlies the Wutai “Group” and was deposited between 2.47 and 2.14 Ga. It should therefore be excluded from the Wutai “Group.” The Hutou “Group” unconformably overlies the Gaofan “Group” and is considered to be ~2.14 Ga or younger in age. The Wanzi “Group” in the Fuping Complex was originally considered to be late Neoarchean in age, but some authors considered it to be early Paleoproterozoic (Guan et al. 2002; Li et al. 2005). It is composed of metasedimentary rocks including marble and is similar to the khondalite sequences of the northwestern NCC in rock association and metamorphism.

  5. (5)

    Whole-rock Nd and Hf-in-zircon isotopic studies indicate that the formation of all early and most late Neoarchean TTGs involved juvenile magmatic additions to the continental crust; most late Neoarchean and early Paleoproterozoic (2.2–2.0 Ga) granitoids formed by recycling of early Neoarchean or older crustal material.

  6. (6)

    The Fuping Complex and the northern portion of the Hengshan Complex underwent upper amphibolite- to granulite-facies metamorphism, whereas the Shizui “Subgroup” of the Wutai “Group” and the southern portion of the Hengshan Complex underwent lower amphibolite-facies metamorphism, and the Taihuai “Subgroup” of the Wutai “Group” underwent greenschist-facies metamorphism. Metamorphic grades vary from granulite facies to greenschist facies from both sides to the center. Consequently, the late Neoarchean granitoid bodies in Wutai commonly show weaker metamorphism and deformation than their equivalents in the Fuping and Hengshan complexes.

  7. (7)

    Fold axes, foliations, and lineations mainly extend in a west–east or southwest–northeast direction. Three episodes of folding and two phases of ductile thrusting and shearing have been identified (Li et al. 2010a). There are two major shear zones: One is the west–east-striking Zhujiafang shear zone separating the granulite-facies Hengshan Complex in the north from the amphibolite-facies Hengshan Complex in the south. Another is the southwest–northeast-striking Longquanguan shear zone separating the Wutai “Group” in the northeast from the Fuping Complex in the southwest.

  8. (8)

    A strong late Paleoproterozoic tectono-thermal event is recorded by well-developed 1.95–1.83 Ga metamorphic zircons. This event resulted in strong metamorphism and deformation in the Fuping and Hengshan complexes and the lower part of the Wutai Complex and formation of the above two shear zones. ~2.5 Ga metamorphic zircons have also been identified in Fuping (Yang, unpublished data), but their significance is uncertain.

(4) Yinshan

Little was known about the early Precambrian basement of the Yinshan Block, but new data were acquired in recent years (Chen 2007; Dong et al. 2012a, b; Fan et al. 2010; Jian et al. 2012; Li et al. 1987; Liu et al. 2012d, 2014; Ma et al. 2013; Ma 2013a, b, 2014a, b; Mei 1991; Zhang et al. 2003; Zhang and Liu 2004; Zhang et al. 2014). The main features of the basement are summarized as follows (Figs. 29 and 30).

Fig. 29
figure 29

Geological map of Yinshan, modified after Jian et al. (2012). For location in the NCC, see Fig. 1

Fig. 30
figure 30

Age histogram of zircons from early Precambrian rocks in Yinshan Block. Data are from Dong et al. (2012a, b), Fan et al. (2010), Jian et al. (2012), Liu et al. (2012d, 2014), Ma et al. (2013); Ma et al. (2013a, b, 2014a, b), and Zhang et al. (2014)

  1. (1)

    There are 2.7 Ga tonalites and 2.6 Ga granites and older xenocrystic zircons in ~2.5 Ga granitoid rocks. The 2.7 Ga tonalite exposure is >10 km2 in size. Zhang et al. (2014) obtained a zircon age of 2.51 Ga for a charnockite exposed near a 2.7 Ga tonalite dated by Ma et al. (2013) and interpreted this to reflect emplacement of the charnockite precursor. However, considering strong recrystallization of the zircon cores, the significance of the 2.51 Ga age is uncertain. We suggest that more >2.6 Ga rocks and zircons will be discovered in Yinshan as more work is carried out.

  2. (2)

    2.55–2.5 Ga magmatism was widespread and resulted in the formation of intrusive rocks composed of tonalite–trondhjemite and subordinate gabbro, diorite, granite, and syenogranite, whereas granodiorite is rare. It appears that most tonalite–trondhjemite formed during an early phase in this event. It also seems likely that, for some rocks, strong recrystallization and Pb loss caused the magmatic zircon apparent ages to become younger than their original ages. Middle to late Paleoproterozoic (2.2–1.9 Ga) granitoid rocks were identified in local areas.

  3. (3)

    Late Neoarchean supracrustal rocks include metavolcanic and volcano-sedimentary sequences including BIFs. Two types of supracrustal sequence can be recognized in terms of metamorphic grade. The high-grade metamorphic supracrustal rocks (the Xinghe “Group”) consist of mafic to felsic granulite with some containing garnet, and the low-grade metamorphic supracrustal rocks (the Sheerteng “Group” or greenstone belt) consist of greenschist- to lower amphibolite-facies mafic to felsic metavolcanic rocks and minor metamorphosed ultramafic rocks, clastic metasediments, and BIF, with some mafic lavas showing relict pillows. The supracrustal and associated intrusive rocks broadly extend in an east–west direction. Some metasedimentary rocks of the high- and low-grade supracrustal sequences are Paleoproterozoic in age (Z.Y. Xu, unpublished data).

  4. (4)

    Whole-rock Nd and Hf-in-zircon isotopic analyses of 2.7, 2.6, and 2.55–2.50 Ga intrusive as well as 2.55–2.50 Ga supracrustal rocks indicate that addition of significant juvenile material from the mantle occurred at 2.8–2.7 Ga, and both juvenile magmatism and crustal recycling played significant roles during magmatic events at the end of the Neoarchean.

  5. (5)

    A late Neoarchean tectono-thermal event was widespread in the Yinshan Block as indicated by abundant ~2.5 Ga metamorphic zircons. Late Paleoproterozoic (1.94–1.86 Ga) metamorphic zircons were also found at several localities. These metamorphic zircons are rare in the high-grade metamorphic rocks, and this was interpreted to be due to late Paleoproterozoic metamorphism having occurred in a dominantly “dry” system caused by previous late Neoarchean high-grade metamorphism (Ma et al. 2012; Wan et al. 2011a, b, c)

3 Distribution of Zircon Ages and Isotope Geochemistry

3.1 Zircon Age Distribution

Wan et al. (2011a) compiled a total of 7586 early Precambrian zircon age data for the entire NCC and arrived at the conclusion that the most significant zircon-forming tectono-thermal events occurred in the late Neoarchean to the earliest Paleoproterozoic (2.55–2.48 Ga) and in the late Paleoproterozoic (1.95–1.80 Ga), with age peaks at ~2.52 and ~1.85 Ga, respectively. In the present study, we compiled additional zircon age data bringing the total to 15060. The geographic distribution of these data is similar to those compiled by Wan et al. (2011a). The main differences include the following: (1) More data were obtained from the Western Block, including the basement of the Ordos basin. (2) Only data are considered where the 1σ error and discordance are less than 20 Ma and 15 %, thus excluding many results obtained by LA-ICP-MS. (3) In areas where rocks underwent strong metamorphism during the late Neoarchean and late Paleoproterozoic, such as eastern Shandong and Daqingshan, some published ages of 2.45–2.0 Ga are not included in our compilation. Although these data satisfy the above analytical conditions, they may still be geologically meaningless because of likely partial resetting of the U–Pb isotopic systems in the zircons and/or partial Pb loss during high-grade metamorphism.

Our new compilation of zircon data supports the earlier conclusions of Wan et al. (2011a) that, considering the NCC as an entity, there is a continuous age record from 3.8 to 1.8 Ga. Two tectono-thermal events are very significant in the late Neoarchean to the earliest Paleoproterozoic and late Paleoproterozoic history of the craton, reflected by age peaks at ~2.52 and ~1.85 Ga, respectively (Fig. 31a). However, the age valleys are slightly different in our new compilation at ~3.6, ~3.2, ~2.85, ~2.65, ~2.25, and 2.0 Ga. Although there is an age valley at ~2.3 Ga worldwide for zircon ages (Condie et al. 2009), rocks of this age were widely identified along the southern margin of the NCC (Diwu et al. 2007, 2014; Huang et al. 2012a b, 2013; Jiang et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012).

Fig. 31
figure 31

Age histogram for zircons from the early Precambrian basement of the North China Craton. a All data for the North China Craton; b data for the Eastern Block; c data for the Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO); d data for the Western Block. See text for interpretation and references

As indicated by Wan et al. (2011a), the Eastern Block shows an important difference to the Western Block and the Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO) in showing abundant ages >3.0 Ga (Fig. 31b–d) because of the well-studied ancient rocks in Anshan and eastern Hebei. The discovery of many >3.3 Ga detrital zircons in the Zhongtiao, Dengfeng, and Jiaozuo areas (Diwu et al. 2008; Gao et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2012a; Yin et al. 2015) reduces the previous age difference between the TNCO and Eastern Block. Significant progress was recently made in dating of early Precambrian basement rocks in the Western Block, including the discovery of 2.7 Ga TTGs and identification of strong magmatism and metamorphism at ~2.5 Ga in the Yinshan Block (Dong et al. 2012a, b; Jian et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2014; Ma et al. 2012, 2013a, b, 2014a, b; Zhang et al. 2014). More data were also obtained from the TNCO and Eastern Block. However, these new results do not change the earlier conclusion that the Eastern Block, Western Block, and TNCO have almost identical late Neoarchean age distribution patterns with zircon ages varying from 2.55 to 2.48 Ga and a prominent age peak at ~2.52 Ga. The prominent age peak in the Western Block seems slightly shifted toward younger ages (Fig. 31d), probably due to the significant early and late Paleoproterozoic metamorphic events.

3.2 Whole-Rock Nd Isotopic Composition

Wu et al. (2005b) compiled Nd isotopic data from NCC rocks and constructed depleted mantle Nd model age histograms that indicated an important period of crustal growth during 3.0–2.6 Ga and minor events at 3.6–3.2 and ~2.2 Ga. Many samples in their compilation were Paleoproterozoic or even younger in age. In order to better understand the Archean geological evolution, we only used data of Archean rocks in our compilation, including some 2.5–2.45 Ga samples. The total number of samples for our εNd(t) versus formation age diagram and the Nd model age histogram are 1103 and 871, respectively. The data are mainly from references published within the last twenty years (more than 70 papers, most are listed in the “References”) together with our unpublished data. Similar to the zircon ages, the whole-rock Nd isotopic data show an uneven geographic distribution. Most results come from the eastern Block, and rock samples older than 2.9 Ga are mainly from Anshan, eastern Hebei, and eastern Shandong. We divided the samples into four types, namely ultramafic to intermediate rocks (including gabbro, diorite, quartz diorite, metamorphic ultramafic rocks, mafic granulite, amphibolite, greenschist, fine-grained hornblende gneiss), TTG and related rocks (e.g., metadacite, fine-grained biotite gneiss), crustally derived granites, and metasedimentary rocks. All parameters and equations used for calculation of depleted mantle Nd model ages are those of Jahn et al. (1990) and Wu et al. (2005b). The crystallization ages of most geological bodies in the NCC were determined from zircon dating. This made it possible to construct εNd(t) versus crystallization age diagrams for the Archean rocks (Fig. 32a–d). Some important features are as follows.

Fig. 32
figure 32

εNd(t) versus formation age diagram for Archean rocks of the North China Craton. a Data for the Eastern Block; b data for the Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO); c data for the Western Block; d all data for the North China Craton. See text for interpretation and references

  1. (1)

    Juvenile, mantle-derived material was added to the crust during several major periods, namely at 3.8, 3.35–3.3, 3.1, 2.9, 2.8, and 2.75–2.5 Ga. Crustal recycling occurred during almost every period of juvenile crustal additions. Some 3.8 Ga rocks from Anshan have negative εNd(t) values, probably suggesting that crustal recycling was already an important process in the Eoarchean. This is similar to the most ancient rocks in Canada (Acasta gneiss, Iizuka et al. 2009) and the Ancient Gneiss Complex of Swaziland, southern Africa (Kröner et al. 2014). Crustal recycling became more dominant with the evolution of continental crust as indicated by εNd(t) values becoming more negative with time.

  2. (2)

    Neoarchean (2.75–2.5 Ga) rocks from the Eastern and Western blocks and TNCO show similar Nd isotopic features. However, the Eastern Block shows higher maturity in crustal evolution than the Western Block and TNCO at the end of Archean.

  3. (3)

    Young, crustally derived rocks inherited the Nd isotopic features from their source material in different areas to variable degrees. In Anshan, for example, some 2.5 Ga crustally derived granites have very negative εNd(t) values due to long geological history up to 3.8 Ga. In contrast, in western Shandong, where the majority of the oldest rocks formed during 2.75–2.7 Ga as addition of juvenile material from depleted mantle source, the 2.5 Ga crustally derived granites commonly have depleted mantle Nd model ages of 2.8‒2.7 Ga.

  4. (4)

    Some rocks older than 3.3 Ga show very high εNd(t) values (Fig. 32a, d). Many of these are from the Anshan area and have very low Sm and Nd contents and are strongly deformed and metamorphosed. Therefore, the above positive anomalies are not considered to be original features of the rocks but are likely due to analytical uncertainty and/or more probably to post-crystallization Nd mobility during metamorphism and other late, fluid-induced geological processes. Some rock samples reported in the earlier literature from the Baijiafen Complex may not be ~3.8 Ga in age, and thus, their εNd(t) values were incorrectly calculated.

The f Sm/Nd values for Archean rock samples selected for the Nd model age histogram are limited to between –0.2 and –0.6 in order to reduce the uncertainties in the model age calculations caused by strong Sm/Nd fractionation during geological processes (Jahn et al. 1990; Wu et al. 2005b). In the single-stage Nd model age (depleted mantle Nd model age) histogram, the data are concentrated between 2.8 and 2.6 Ga with a model age peak at ~2.75 Ga (Fig. 33a). Different rock types show similar single-stage Nd model ages between 3.1 and 2.5 Ga. Compared with TTGs, however, ultramafic to intermediate rocks commonly have young Nd model ages. A model age valley is seen at ~3.1 Ga, and the model ages show a plateau distribution between 3.9 and 3.1 Ga. Two-stage model ages (crustal model ages) show a similar distribution but are commonly shifted toward older ages by 100–50 Ma (Fig. 33a, b).

Fig. 33
figure 33

Nd model age histograms for Archean rocks of the North China Craton. a Single-stage model age (depleted mantle model age); b two-stage model age (crustal model age). See text for further interpretation and references

3.3 Hf-in-Zircon Isotopic Composition

Geng et al. (2012) and Wang and Liu (2012) summarized the Hf isotopic features of zircons from early Precambrian basement rocks of the NCC and arrived at the conclusion that crust formation and growth of the craton mainly occurred during the early Neoarchean (2.8–2.7 Ga). In this paper, we used 8564 and 8736 data to compile εHf(t) versus formation age diagrams and Hf model age histograms, respectively. These data are mainly from Archean rocks of the NCC (some are 2.49–2.45 Ga in age, and some detrital zircon data are from Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks). The data sources are mainly from references published within the last ten years (more than 80 papers, many listed in the “References”), together with our unpublished data, and the geographic distribution of the data is similar to those of zircon U–Pb ages with most data for >2.9 Ga rocks being from Anshan, eastern Hebei, and eastern Shandong. Zircon subdivisions are the same in Sect. 3.1. All parameters and equations used for calculation and diagram are those used by Bouvier et al. (2008), Griffin et al. (2000), and Söderlund et al. (2004).

In εHf(t) versus formation age diagrams, data points far below the depleted mantle evolution line have two possible interpretations: (1) the rock formed by melting of older crustal material; (2) zircons with apparently depleted mantle Hf isotopic compositions underwent lead loss, and therefore, their age assessment is wrong. In order to avoid such possibly erroneous data, we only used weighted mean 207Pb/206Pb ages and upper concordia intercept ages for magmatic and metamorphic zircons. We also excluded data where zircon analyses have a discordance of >40 %. For detrital zircons, individual data were only used when the 1σ error is less than 20 Ma and the discordance is less than 15 %. Considering the entire NCC, the Hf-in-zircon isotopic data show a similar distribution as the whole-rock Nd isotopic compositions, namely addition of juvenile material to the crust at 3.8–3.55, 3.45, 3.35–3.3, 2.9, and 2.8–2.5 Ga (Fig. 34a–d). Crustal recycling began as early as 3.8 Ga, lasted from 3.8 to 3.25 Ga and, between 3.25 and 2.90 Ga, played a more important role than addition of juvenile material. Ca. 2.90 Ga granitoids in Anben and eastern Shandong show different zircon Hf isotopic features, reflecting differences in their early geological histories. It seems that the original features of Hf-in-zircon isotopic compositions are better preserved than those of whole-rock Nd isotopic compositions. Compared to the whole-rock Nd isotopic data, Hf-in-zircon data reveal significant additions of juvenile material and stronger crustal recycling. This is probably due to a much larger data set and may thus more objectively reflect the Archean geological evolution of the NCC. For the Eastern Block and TNCO, whole-rock Nd isotopic data show obvious differences in the εNd(t) versus formation age diagram (Fig. 32a–b), whereas the Hf-in-zircon isotopic data are similar in the εHf(t) versus formation age diagram (Fig. 34a–b). For example, many detrital zircons from the Zhongtiao area of the TNCO have distinctly negative εHf(t) values, suggesting that >2.9 Ga rocks may occur in this area, and therefore, the TNCO shows similar isotopic features in early crustal evolution as the Eastern Block. In many cases, metamorphic zircons inherited the Hf isotopic features of their magmatic zircons in the same rocks unless metamorphic garnet occurs in the metamorphic rocks. It may therefore be incorrect to assign a metamorphic age to the 176Hf/177Hf ratio, but it should be the igneous age of the host rock. However, if using the igneous ages, metamorphic zircon analyses will occur in the same area as the magmatic zircons, making it more difficult to distinguish them. Considering this and presence of garnet in only a few metamorphic rocks, we still use metamorphic zircon ages in this paper. It is easily observed that metamorphic zircons are similar in their Hf isotopic features to magmatic zircons.

Fig. 34
figure 34

εHf(t) versus formation age diagrams for zircons of Archean rocks from the North China Craton. a Data for the Eastern Block; b data for the Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO); c data for the Western Block; d all data for the North China Craton. Dotted and dashed lines represent felsic crust with 176Lu/177Hf being 0.01 and 0.015, respectively. See text for interpretation and references

Fig. 35
figure 35

Two-stage Hf model age (crustal Hf model age) histogram for zircons of Archean rocks from the North China Craton. Some are 2.49–2.45 Ga in age, and some detrital zircons are from Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks. See text for interpretation and references

Zircons do not generally crystallize from magmas derived directly from mantle sources. Therefore, their single-stage Hf model ages (depleted mantle Hf model ages) are geologically meaningless, and corresponding histograms are not shown here. Two-stage Hf model ages (crustal Hf model ages) are commonly shifted by about 100–50 Ma toward old ages compared with depleted mantle Hf model ages. In the two-stage Hf model age histogram, the data are concentrated between 2.85 and 2.6 Ga with an age peak at ~2.8 Ga (Fig. 35). The age valley occurs at ~3.3 Ga. Compared with the whole-rock Nd model ages, the zircon Hf model ages show an obvious plateau distribution but with a larger age variation between 4.1 and 3.2 Ga. We point out that the continuous whole-rock Nd and zircon Hf model age distributions do not mean that juvenile material was continuously added to the continental crust. We rather suggest that the patterns in whole-rock εNd(t) and zircon εHf(t) versus formation age diagrams are partly a result of mixing of juvenile and recycled material.

4 Formation and Evolution of the Archean Basement of the NCC

4.1 Temporal Evolution

Rocks older than 2.8 Ga only occur in local areas such as Anshan, eastern Hebei, eastern Shandong, Lushan, and Xinyang, amounting to less than 5 % of the area of the NCC Archean basement. However, detrital and xenocrystic zircons older than 2.8 Ga occur over a wider area. Rocks >3.4 Ga consist mainly of granitoids, but ultramafic to mafic rocks of these ages are also present, but most were not dated due to lack of magmatic zircon. Almost all rocks and zircons were involved in a late Neoarchean tectono-thermal event. Rocks >2.8 Ga do not show an increasing trend in distribution with time, but this may be due to uneven reworking of old rocks during later geological processes. 2.75–2.6 Ga magmatic rocks have recently been identified in many areas, and 2.55–2.5 Ga rocks occur more widely than thought before.

Only a few >2.6 Ga supracrustal rocks have been identified, including the 3.36 Ga Chentaigou supracrustals and the 3.0–2.9 Ga Tiejiashan supracrustals in Anshan, the 2.9 Ga Huangyadi supracrustals in eastern Shandong, the 2.82 Ga Xiataihua supracrustals in Lushan, and the 2.75–2.71 Ga Yanlingguan-Liuhang succession in western Shandong. However, 2.56–2.51 Ga supracrustal rocks occur in almost every late Neoarchean terrane, although their proportions are small (commonly <10 %). Basaltic, intermediate, and felsic volcano-sedimentary rocks are the predominant protoliths of the supracrustal sequences.

Intrusive rocks show variations in rock types with time. The 3.8–3.1 and 2.9–2.7 Ga intrusive rocks are mainly trondhjemitic and tonalitic in composition, respectively, but some gabbroic and dioritic rocks also occur. The oldest large-scale K-rich granite body is the crustally derived 3.0–2.9 Ga Tiejiashan pluton. Granodiorites only began to occur in the late Neoarchean on a large scale, together with tonalites and trondhjemites, whereas crustally derived late Neoarchean granites (mainly monzogranites and syenogranites) are widely distributed.

TTG rocks with ages between 3.45 and 3.3 Ga exhibit variable REE contents, resulting in weakly to strongly fractionated REE patterns. This is considered to be a result of cooling of the Earth (Wan et al. 2005a). However, Moyen (2011) indicated that variable REE patterns in TTGs do not have any relationships with the cooling Earth. Some late Neoarchean rock types such as syenogranite show large variations in REE and trace element compositions, suggesting that the source regions and conditions of magma formation became more complex with time.

The NCC exhibits a continuous evolution from 3.8 to 2.5 Ga, but there are age valleys at ~3.5, ~3.2, 2.85, and ~2.65 Ga. Whole-rock Nd isotopes and Hf-in-zircon isotopes indicate that both juvenile additions and crustal recycling played important roles during almost every tectono-thermal event. The Neoarchean was the most important period for the formation of continental crust in the NCC, and this will be discussed below in more detail.

Metamorphic zircons older than 2.8 Ga were rarely found, and their formation may be related to local events. The oldest (2.76 Ga) well-developed metamorphic zircons are from 2.82 Ga rocks in the Lushan area. Widespread 2.6 Ga metamorphic zircon ages were obtained from rocks in western Shandong. The most important Archean metamorphic event occurred at the end of the Neoarchean, as indicated by widespread ~2.5 Ga metamorphic zircon ages all over the craton. These may suggest that significant crustal thickening only occurred after the Mesoarchean and reached a climax at the end of the Neoarchean due to subduction/collision and/or underplating. Ca. 2.5 Ga metamorphic zircons have not been identified in some areas such as Wutai, but this may be due to the low metamorphic grade in these rocks. In Anshan, there are 3.8–2.5 Ga rocks and zircons, and in eastern Hebei, 3.88–3.4 Ga detrital zircons and 3.4–3.0 Ga and 2.5 Ga rocks have been identified. Many old zircons show overgrowth and recrystallization, suggesting that they became involved in later crustal recycling and metamorphism.

The most important Archean ore deposits in the NCC are BIFs and some massive Cu–Zn sulfide deposits. Although BIFs show large variations in formation age from the Paleoarchean to the early Paleoproterozoic, they are predominantly late Neoarchean in age (2.55–2.51 Ga) (Wan et al. 2012d; Zhang et al. 2012b). It seems that a stable depositional environment was necessary for the formation of large-scale BIF deposits. Gold deposits mainly formed in the Mesozoic, but it is generally considered that Archean mafic–ultramafic supracrustal rocks (greenstone belts) were the main sources (Zhai 2010).

4.2 Ancient Material Records Beneath the NCC

Understanding the geological, geochemical, and geochronological processes during the early Precambrian evolution of the NCC is mainly based on studying the exposed basement as shown above. However, some progress has been made to recognize ancient material in the deep crust of the NCC. There are two ways to obtain information from this cratonic region. One is from rock samples recovered from drill holes that penetrated the basement. One such study revealed late Paleoproterozoic magmatism and metamorphism in basement rocks beneath the Songliao basin in the northeastern NCC (Pei et al. 2007), whereas another study indicated that the basement beneath the Ordos basin in the western NCC was involved in a late Paleoproterozoic tectono-thermal event (Hu et al. 2012; Wan et al. 2013).

Wan et al. (2014b) recently carried out zircon dating, Hf-in-zircon isotopic analyses, and a whole-rock geochemical study of igneous and metasedimentary rocks from basement covered by Mesoproterozoic and younger sedimentary rocks in the Central Hebei Basin (CHB). The CHB extends in a NE–SW direction and covers an area of >35,000 km2 (Fig. 36). Based on drill core data and geophysical investigations (NCOCP 2012), the basement is composed of greenschist- to upper amphibolite-facies magmatic and supracrustal rocks that locally experienced anatexis. The bottom of the basin shows irregular elevations with the greatest depth being >5000 m. This study identified late Neoarchean magmatic and Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks that were subjected to late Neoarchean to early Paleoproterozoic and late Paleoproterozoic tectono-thermal events, similar to those identified in the early Precambrian basement around the basin. Wan et al. (2014b) concluded that the basement beneath the CHB is part of the NCC. On the basis of this study, the authors suggested that early Precambrian rocks are extensive beneath the Mesoproterozoic and younger sedimentary cover all over the NCC.

Fig. 36
figure 36

Geological map of the Central Hebei Basin and surrounding areas, modified after NCOCP (2012) and Wan et al. (2014b). Inset shows location in the NCC

Another way to reveal ancient material in the deep crust is to study rock enclaves (xenoliths) and xenocrystic zircons brought to the surface by eruption of volcanoes and/or intrusion of magmas from a deep source. Zheng et al. (2012), Zhang et al. (2012a, b), and Zhang (2014) summarized progresses made in the investigation of such rocks and zircons. Young igneous rocks containing old xenoliths and xenocrystic zircons include Paleozoic kimberlite and lamproite, Mesozoic volcanic or intrusive rocks, and Cenozoic basalts (Fig. 37). The xenoliths are considered to be derived from the lower crust and upper mantle. The lower crustal xenoliths consist of high-grade metamorphic rocks generally less than 10 cm in diameter. Many igneous rocks also contain xenocrystic zircons that were derived from lower crustal sources or were captured during magma ascent. These samples provide important information on the age and composition of the deep NCC crust.

Fig. 37
figure 37

Geological map showing locations of rocks containing xenoliths and xenocrystic zircons in the North China Craton and adjacent area. Paleozoic kimbertite/lamproite: Mengyin, Fuxin, and Yingxian; Mesozoic volcanic/intrusive rocks: Xinyang, Erfengshan, Yinan, Qingdao, Huyanshan, Zijinshan, Dishuiyan, Siziwangqi, and Fuxian; Cenozoic basalt: Nushan, Hebi, Junan, Shanwang, Qixia, Xiuyan, Pingquan, Hannuoba, Huinan, and Kuandian. Locations of rocks containing xenoliths and xenocrystic zircons are from HF Zhang et al. (2012a, b) and Zheng et al. (2012)

The concordia diagram with zircon age data from xenoliths shows several clusters around 2.5, 1.9–1.8, and 0.1 Ga (Fig. 38a). Some data for old zircons from xenoliths of the Xinyang volcanic rocks plot along a discordia line with an upper concordia intercept age of ~3.6 Ga. Note that there is significant lead loss in some of these zircons. Thus, a cumulative histogram compiling all data may lead to an overestimate of zircon crystallization events. Several lead loss trends can be recognized: (1) ancient lead loss in Paleoarchean zircon grains at ca. 2.5 and 1.8 Ga; (2) ancient lead loss in Neoarchean zircon grains at 1.8 Ga; and (3) lead loss in Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic zircons during the Phanerozoic. The concordia diagram of zircon xenocrysts shows a similar age pattern, including lead loss (Fig. 38b). These features were also observed in the zircon age distribution of the exposed early Precambrian basement. However, there are no zircon grains with Paleoarchean ages, consistent with the limited occurrence of such rocks in the NCC.

Fig. 38
figure 38

Ages and Hf isotopes of zircons from deep crust in the North China Craton. a and b U–Pb concordia diagrams; c and d age versus εHf(t) diagrams; e and f Hf model age histograms. a, c, and e zircons from xenoliths; b, d, and f xenocrystic zircons. Data are from Gao et al. (2004), YS Liu et al. (2004b), Ying et al. (2011), Zhang (2012), Zhang et al. (2012a, b, c), and Zheng et al. (2004a, b, c, 2008)

All early Paleoproterozoic zircon data, including those with variable lead loss, are shown in Fig. 38c and d. The Hf-in-zircon isotopic data from the xenoliths show that the oldest age group has even more negative εHf(t) (Fig. 38c) than the Paleoarchean zircons in the Anben and Caozhuang areas, indicating that they represent recycled crust. The ~2.5 Ga zircon grains have both negative and positive εHf(t), implying that juvenile material was added to the crust and recycling of older material also occurred. A similar pattern was observed in the 1.9–1.8 Ga zircons. Specifically, Phanerozoic zircon grains mainly show negative εHf(t) values, and some grains have extremely low εHf(t) of –40 and even lower. There is no doubt that some Archean material was recycled during Phanerozoic tectono-magmatic events. The Hf isotopic data of the zircon xenocryst show a similar pattern (Fig. 38d).

Both the data from xenoliths and zircon xenocrysts show similar Hf model age distributions (Fig. 38e, f) as those from basement rocks exposed on the surface. The major peak is at about 2.8 Ga, and very old model ages near the beginning of the formation of continental crust on the Earth suggest that there may be some very old material in the deep crust of the NCC.

4.3 Major Periods of Continent Formation

Formation of continental crust in the NCC can be traced back to the Eoarchean. Geological records earlier than Mesoarchean were most likely partly destroyed during later tectono-metamorphic processes, and it seems likely that the Neoarchean was a major period of crust formation in the NCC. This means that some crucial processes occurred in the Earth during this time, probably indicating a transformation in the global tectonic regime due to changes in the thermal state of the Earth from hot to cool. Zircon age histograms indicate that the most important tectono-thermal event occurred at ~2.5 Ga. Evidence for addition of juvenile material at ~2.5 Ga includes the following: (1) Ca. 2.5 Ga supracrustal rocks (greenstone belts), commonly with a high proportion of metabasalt, occur in almost every terrane; (2) Ca. 2.5 Ga gabbroic to dioritic rocks are widely distributed all over the NCC (Li et al. 2010b; Ma et al. 2012; Wan et al. 2010c; Wan, unpublished data); and (3) some ~2.5 Ga TTGs exhibit whole-rock Nd and Hf-in-zircon isotopic compositions similar to the depleted mantle (Diwu et al. 2012; Geng et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2009b; Wang and Liu 2012; this study). However, mafic to intermediate assemblages (including volcanic and intrusive rocks) constitute only a small portion of the granitoid–greenstone belts, and 2.5 Ga TTGs with depleted mantle model ages are relatively rare (Figs. 32d and 34d).

In western Shandong, >2.8 Ga rocks have not been identified, but voluminous ~2.5 Ga crustally derived granites show the same whole-rock Nd and Hf-in-zircon isotopic features as the 2.75–2.7 Ga rocks. Therefore, the ~2.5 Ga granitoids are considered to have been derived from 2.75–2.7 Ga sources (Wan et al. 2010c, 2011b). In areas where >2.8 Ga rocks are exposed, ~2.5 Ga granites with Nd and Hf isotopic compositions of 2.7 Ga juvenile rocks could have formed as a result of mixtures of depleted mantle-derived magmas and older crustal material. However, >2.8 Ga rocks are rare in the NCC, so this may not have been a significant process for the formation of ~2.5 Ga granitoids. On the other hand, some magmatic zircons from ~2.5 Ga gabbros, diorites, and granodiorites show Hf isotopic enrichment, similar to the Nd isotopic composition of some ~2.5 Ga amphibolites. This may be a feature of a mantle source or a result of crustal contamination of magmas derived from a depleted mantle. There are three potential sources for the ~2.5 Ga magmatic rocks with similar Nd and Hf isotopic compositions as the 2.7 Ga juvenile rocks (Wan et al. 2014a): (1) Ca. 2.7 Ga granitoids that constituted precursors for the ~2.5 Ga crustally derived granitoids; (2) Ca. 2.7 Ga mafic rocks that also constituted precursors for the ~2.5 Ga intermediate and more felsic rocks; and (3) a mantle source with ~2.7 Ga depleted mantle model ages from which some mafic rocks could have been derived. The possibility cannot be excluded that ~2.5 Ga granitoids with ~2.7 Ga depleted mantle model ages resulted from crustal recycling of ~2.5 Ga mantle-derived rocks with the same isotopic features; however, rocks formed in this way must be limited in volume. Therefore, the conclusion can be drawn that the most important period of addition of juvenile material occured in the early Neoarchean rather than in the late Neoarchean, consistent with rocks and detrital and xenocrystic zircons of these ages occurring in many areas of the NCC. Fundamentally, therefore, the NCC is similar to many other cratons elsewhere in that tectono-thermal and crust-forming events at ~2.7 Ga are globally well developed. The main difference between the NCC and many other cratons is that a superimposed ~2.5 Ga tectono-thermal event was particularly strong in the former (Wan et al. 2010c, 2011b, 2014a, 2015b; Zhai and Santosh 2011).

4.4 Tectonic Subdivision of the NCC

The early Precambrian subdivision of the craton is mainly based on the distribution of late Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic rocks because of insufficient data for the earlier geological evolution. The subdivision is debated in the literature, and several schemes have been proposed as summarized by Zhai and Santosh (2011) and Zhao and Zhai (2013).

Wu et al. (1998) subdivided the NCC into five blocks, namely the Jiaoliao, Qianhuai, Jinji, Yuwan, and Mongshan blocks (Fig. 39a). The Jiaoliao and Qianhuai blocks were considered to have assembled along the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, resulting from an east-dipping subduction zone to form a larger block at ~2.5 Ga which then collided with other blocks to result in final amalgamation of the NCC during the late Paleoproterozoic.

Fig. 39
figure 39

Different tectonic subdivisions of the North China Craton. a Wu et al. (1998); b Zhao et al. (2005); c Li et al. (2002); d Zhai and Santosh (2011)

Zhao et al. (2001) suggested a 3-fold subdivision of the craton, namely the Eastern Block, Western Block, and Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO). Late Archean anticlockwise P-T paths for the two blocks were interpreted to have resulted from several mantle plumes, resulting in magmatic underplating and high-grade metamorphism at ~2.5 Ga, whereas the clockwise path in the TNCO was interpreted to reflect continental collision between the Eastern and Western blocks, leading to Paleoproterozoic assembly of the NCC at ~1.85 Ga. Zhao et al. (2005) later modified this model into the currently favored 6-fold subdivision of the craton (Fig. 39b), resulting from the speculative interpretation of major collisional zones within both the Eastern and Western blocks.

Li et al. (2002), Kusky and Li (2003), and Kusky et al. (2007) suggested that collision between the Eastern and Western blocks occurred in the late Neoarchean (~2.5 Ga) along the Central Orogenic Belt (COB) to form a unified NCC. The COB is similar in spatial distribution to the TNCO of Zhao et al. (2001, 2005) with differences being that the COB extends farther northeast into southern Jilin (Fig. 39c) and that the subduction polarity was west-dipping, rather than east-dipping, as suggested by Zhao et al. (2001, 2005).

Zhai and Santosh (2011) subdivided the NCC into seven microblocks, mainly based on the spatial distribution of ancient rocks and tectonic boundaries revealed by several granite–greenstone belts. These were named the Alashan (ALS), Xuhuai (XH), Xuchang (XCH), Jining (JN), Ordos (OR), Qianhuai (QH), and Jiaoliao (JL) blocks, with very different boundaries from those of other authors. They suggested that these microblocks were welded together along Neoarchean granite–greenstone belts at ~2.5 Ga (Fig. 39d).

In order to understand the tectonic setting of the NCC during the late Neoarchean, it is necessary to determine the spatial distribution of ancient (≥2.6 Ga) continental domains in the craton. A strong tectono-thermal event at ~2.6 Ga in western Shandong is an important reason for considering 2.6 Ga as a chronological boundary between the early and late Neoarchean. With regard to the spatial distribution of these ancient crustal domains, rocks and zircons of different origins and ages have different geodynamic interpretations. Rocks ≥2.6 Ga themselves represent ancient crust, whereas ≥2.6 Ga detrital zircons in late Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks suggest the existence of ancient crust in nearby areas, and ≥2.6 Ga xenocrystic zircons in young (<1.8 Ga) intrusive rocks may indicate the existence of old material in the deep crust. However, old detrital zircons in young sedimentary rocks have no significance because they may have undergone multirecycling. Figure 1 shows ≥2.6 Ga detrital and xenocrystic zircons from Paleoproterozoic or older rocks. Based on the spatial distribution of ancient rocks and zircons, three ancient terranes can be delineated, namely the Eastern Ancient Terrane, Southern Ancient Terrane, and Central Ancient Terrane (Fig. 40).

Fig. 40
figure 40

Distribution of ancient (>2.6 Ga) terranes in the North China Craton. EAT Eastern Ancient Terrane; SAT Southern Ancient Terrane; CAT Central Ancient Terrane. Abbreviations are as in Fig. 1

(1) Eastern Ancient Terrane

This is the best understood ancient terrane and occurs along the eastern margin of the NCC in a NE–SW direction, including Anben, eastern Hebei, eastern Shandong, and western Shandong. The oldest rocks and zircons mainly occur in this terrane. Besides the 3.8–2.9 Ga rocks in Anshan and 3.4–3.0 Ga rocks and 3.8–3.3 Ga detrital zircons in eastern Hebei, 2.9–2.6 Ga rocks were identified in eastern Shandong and western Shandong. The spatial relationships between the old rocks in the terrane may not have changed significantly since the early Neoarchean (2.6 Ga). In western Shandong, the margin of the ancient terrane is the boundary between belts B and C (Fig. 19). Although granitoids in Belt A are mainly ~2.5 Ga in age, they are derived from melting of older basement. Syenogranites and monzogranites are also widely distributed in eastern Hebei, Jinzhou, and Anben, and they constitute the largest crustally derived late Neoarchean granite belt in the NCC. It is notable that these ~2.5 Ga granitoids inherited their compositional features from older basement. As mentioned above, in Anshan, recycling of >3.0 Ga crust played a profound role in the formation of the ~2.5 Ga syenogranites, as evidenced by the presence of older xenocrystic zircons as well as whole-rock Nd and Hf-in-zircon isotopic compositions (Wan et al. 2015a). In western Shandong, on the other hand, the ~2.5 Ga crustally derived granites in Belt A have similar whole-rock Nd and Hf-in-zircon isotopic compositions as the adjacent early Neoarchean rocks (Wan et al. 2010c, 2011b).

(2) Southern Ancient Terrane

This terrane occurs along the southern margin of the NCC in a nearly E–W direction. 3.65, 2.83–2.82, 2.7, and 2.7–2.6 Ga rocks have been identified in Xinyang, Lushan, Huoqiu, and Zhongtiao, respectively, and 3.6–2.6 Ga detrital and xenocrystic zircons were discovered in additional areas (Liu et al. 2012b). Importantly, as pointed out before, the captured or detrital 4.1–3.5 Ga zircons in Paleozoic volcano-sedimentary rocks of the northern Qinling Orogenic Belt may be derived from the southern margin of the NCC. This suggests that the Southern Ancient Terrane may have a long geological history back to 4.1 Ga ago. Widespread identification of >2.6 Ga rocks and zircons in this terrane is an important progress made in recent years.

(3) Central Ancient Terrane

This includes the Zanhuang, Fuping, Hengshan, Zhangjaikou, and Chengde areas where 2.7 Ga TTG rocks and zircons were identified, although the TTG rocks commonly occur at small scales. It is likely that more rocks and zircons older than 2.6 Ga will be discovered in this terrane, and the widespread presence of crustally derived granites in the Central Ancient Terrane is also consistent with the existence of older material in the deep crust. However, there are also many ~2.5 Ga TTG rocks in the terrane, and this makes it uncertain whether or not the Central Ancient Terrane existed prior to 2.6 Ga.

Besides the above three ancient terranes, >2.6 Ga rocks and zircons were identified in other areas of the NCC. For example, in Xi Wulanbulang, 2.7 Ga TTG rocks with a relatively wide distribution as well as older detrital and xenocrystic zircons were discovered (Jian et al. 2012; Dong et al. 2012a, 2012b; Ma et al. 2013). Ca. 2.5 Ga zircons in late Neoarchean supracrustal and intrusive rocks have the same Hf isotopic compositions as zircons from the 2.7 Ga TTG rocks, providing evidence for crustal recycling or contamination of early Neoarchean crust. Therefore, there may also be an ancient terrane in the Yinshan Block.

4.5 Tectonic Regime

Mantle plume activity resulting in magmatic underplating and plate tectonics are considered to have been the most important processes involving the formation and evolution of early continental crust (Van Kranendonk et al. 2014), but the timing of initiation of plate tectonics is debatable. Some authors suggested that present-type plate tectonics only began in the late Paleoproterozoic or later, whereas others considered that tectonic regimes similar to those of today occurred as early as the Eoarchean (e.g., Nutman et al. 2013). Therefore, there are different opinions on whether mantle plume activity (or underplating) and/or arc magmatism or both played key roles in the Neoarchean, an important period when much of the global continental crust formed (Bédard 2013; Condie and Kröner 2013; Dostal and Mueller 2013; Halla et al. 2009; Manikyamba and Kerrich 2012; Mohan et al. 2013; Wyman 2013a, b). Magmatic underplating is considered to be related to mantle plume activity or, more probably, to mantle overturn (Davies 1995; Rey et al. 2003) and may have been an important mechanism in continental growth and reworking (Frost et al. 2001; Warren and Ellis 1996). Mantle plumes generally last for only 5–10 Ma (Abbott and Isley 2002), a much shorter time span than the late Neoarchean (2.55–2.50 Ga) igneous activity in the NCC. Mantle overturn may have led to longer magmatism.

We now have a better understanding of the early (>2.8 Ga) evolution of the NCC through detailed studies in some areas. In Anshan, magmatism almost continuously lasted for a long time from 3.8 to 2.9 Ga (Fig. 12), where multiple and complex phases of igneous activity were recorded in all three complexes (Fig. 41). The rock types include both mantle-derived and crustally derived rocks (Dong et al. 2013; Liu et al. 1992, 2008; Song et al. 1996; Wan et al. 2005a, 2007, 2012a, 2015a; Zhou et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2009). These data suggest that long-term magmatism related to mantle activity widely occurred in Anshan and adjacent area. In eastern Hebei, detrital zircons record almost continuous ages ranging from 3.88 to 3.4 Ga, although only 3.4–3.0 Ga Paleoarchean–Mesoarchean rocks were discovered until now. We suggest that widespread magmatism due to mantle overturn activity may have been the main mechanism of continental growth and reworking before the Mesoarchean, consistent with the underplating model.

Fig. 41
figure 41

Comparison of the Archean magmatic records of the Baijiafen, Dongshan, and Shengousi complexes in the Anshan area. Data are from Liu et al. (1992, 2008), Song et al. (1996), Wan et al. (2005a, b, c, 2012a), Wu et al. (2008), and Wan (unpublished data)

Western Shandong and eastern Shandong are areas where ~2.7 Ga rocks are most widely distributed in the NCC. Metabasalts with REE depletion and enrichment have been identified in western Shandong, and komatiites with well-preserved spinifex textures (Fig. 18d) were considered to be ~2.7 Ga in age (Polat et al. 2006a). In eastern Shandong, ~2.7 Ga TTGs formed about 200 Ma later than ~2.9 Ga TTGs, and this suggests that subduction may not have been responsible for the formation of the ~2.7 Ga rocks because a 200 Ma time span is too short for a full Wilson cycle (Jahn et al. 2008). Furthermore, the majority of TTG rocks in both western Shandong and eastern Shandong show strongly fractionated REE patterns and Nb–Ti–P depletion (Jahn et al. 2008; Wan et al. 2014a). Based on rock associations, TTG compositions, and the geological evolution, mafic magma underplating was considered as a viable process for the formation of the supracrustal and intrusive rocks (Jahn et al. 2008; Polat et al. 2006a). The tectonic setting of ~2.7 Ga rocks in other areas is not so clear because of their small size and poor data. However, Yang et al. (2013a) favored a subduction model for the formation of ~2.7 Ga TTG rocks in the Zanhuang area.

Underplating and arc magmatism have been proposed for crustal growth in the late Neoarchean. The former model was mainly suggested from studies of the eastern NCC (Geng et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2008; Zhao et al. 1998, 1999, 2001). Zhao and Zhai (2013) summarized the main features supporting this view as follows: (1) An exceptionally large exposure of granitoid intrusions formed over a short time period (2.55–2.50 Ga) and shows no systematic age progression across a ~800-km-wide block; (2) generation of komatiitic magmas with eruption temperatures as high as ~1650 °C; (3) dominant domal structures; (4) bimodal volcanic assemblages in the greenstone sequences; (5) affinities of mafic rocks to continental tholeiitic basalts; and (6) metamorphism with anticlockwise P-T paths involving isobaric cooling. Jian et al. (2012) attributed the strong late Neoarchean (2.55–2.50 Ga) magmatism and metamorphism in the Yinshan Block to episodic mantle upwelling/melting as a result of spontaneous delamination of the lower crust and periodic delamination of melt residues during granitoid production. They considered this to have occurred in a continental environment because of the presence of >2.6 Ga rocks and zircons.

Some authors suggested a scenario of arc magmatism followed by collisional orogeny, although there are different opinions on the timing and spatial distribution of collisional belts (Kröner et al. 2005a, b; Kusky and Li 2003; Kusky et al. 2007; Li et al. 2002; Nutman et al. 2011; Polat et al. 2006b; Wan et al. 2005b, c, 2010c, 2012c; Wilde et al. 2005; Wu et al. 1998; Zhang et al. 2007, 2009; Zhao et al. 2001, 2002, 2005). The main points include the following: (1) Igneous rocks of different ages and compositions occur in different zones and spatially show an asymmetrical distribution in some areas such as western Shandong and eastern Hebei; (2) compared with TTGs, syenogranites and monzogranites commonly formed during a slightly late phase; (3) older rocks (2.56–2.525 Ga) commonly underwent stronger deformation and metamorphism than younger rocks (2.525–2.48 Ga); (4) intrusive and volcanic activities occurred during almost a same period, and the intrusive rocks were uplifted quickly to the surface to form the source for sediments in the late Neoarchean basins, suggesting an active tectonic environment; (5) there are metabasaltic rocks with depletion and enrichment features in many supracrustal belts; and (6) intrusive rocks of different compositions are commonly depleted in Nb and Ta and thus display a subduction-related chemical signature. Nutman et al. (2011) indicated that the complexity of the late Neoarchean eastern Hebei arc magmatism matches that found in long-lived arc systems that involved older continental crust, such as the Andean margin of South America (Hildreth and Moorbath 1988), the Paleoproterozoic of South Greenland (Garde et al. 2002), and the Neoarchean crustal development in southern India (Chadwick et al. 2007).

In fact, some of the above features can be intercepted by both the underplating and subduction models. More data, including geophysical surveys, are required in order to better understand the tectonic regime in the NCC during the late Neoarchean. These include (1) the difference in the spatial distribution of Archean rocks at present and in the late Neoarchean and (2) the compositions and ages of the unexposed basement. It is difficult to explain that the above two different tectonic settings worked at the same time with underplating having occurred beneath the Eastern and Western blocks when both these blocks moved toward each other resulting in subduction/collision. On the basis of similarities in rock association, ages of formation, and geological evolution in different areas, we suggest that only one tectonic setting played an important role in the NCC during the late Neoarchean.

It is notable that globally, apart from the NCC, ~2.5 Ga rocks only occur in a few areas such as southern India (Chadwick et al. 2007; Clark et al. 2009; Dey et al. 2012; Jayananda et al. 2000; Moyen et al. 2003), Antarctica (Corvino and Henjes-Kunst 2007; Clark et al. 2012; Duclaux et al. 2008; Tsunogae et al. 2014), and northern Australia (Drüppel et al. 2009; McCready et al. 2004). The NCC underwent a much stronger tectono-thermal event at ~2.5 Ga than many other cratons characterized by ~2.7 Ga events (Condie 2000; Condie et al. 2009). It may be possible that all these continental terranes once belonged to a single block (Clark et al. 2012; Wan et al. 2011a; Zhao et al. 2003), but more work is required to identify this. If underplating was active at ~2.5 Ga, it may have modified an early Neoarchean supracontinent previously formed by a widespread and strong ~2.7 Ga tectono-thermal event. On the other hand, if arc magmatism was active at this time, the areas where ~2.5 Ga TTG rocks are well developed may represent an ancient subduction/collision belt between two large blocks of the early Neoarchean. In both cases, the different cratons may be dispersed remnants of what was once a single continent at the end of the Neoarchean, consistent with many cratons showing fragmented features (Bleeker 2003).

All late Neoarchean tectono-magmatic belts so far proposed in the NCC, such as the Liao-Ji-Lu magmatic belt (Wu et al. 1998), the Central Orogenic Belt (Li et al. 2002), and the greenstone belts (Zhai and Santosh 2011), only contain a relatively small portion of the late Neoarchean areas. Therefore, these are not consistent with the arc magmatism model. In order to overcome this problem, we propose a multi-island arc model in which the three ancient terranes, and possibly other old terranes, occurred in an oceanic domain, and amalgamation of these terranes due to subduction/collision resulted in the formation of supracrustal and intrusive rocks as well as juvenile additions and crustal recycling and finally assembled the NCC at the end of the Neoarchean. This is consistent with rocks of continental and oceanic affinities in many areas of the NCC. In the western Liaoning, Dengfeng and Huai’an areas, for example, there are supracrustal and intrusive rocks apparently derived from depleted mantle sources, but crustally derived granites and sediments have also been identified (Diwu et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2009b; Wang et al. 2011). The late Neoarchean may have been a period when plate tectonics began to play an important role in crust formation, although subduction/collision would have been different in pattern and scale from present-day processes because the Earth was hotter than now and the oceanic lithosphere was thicker, softer, and more buoyant, and continent blocks were smaller.

4.6 Craton Stabilization

Although there are different opinions on the late Neoarchean tectono-thermal event in the NCC, it is accepted by many authors, including those who favored the arc magmatism model (Nutman et al. 2011; Wan et al. 2010c, 2011b), that the latest Neoarchean event was related to an extensional tectonic setting, probably due to magmatic underplating. Most latest Neoarchean crustally derived granites have formation ages of 2.52–2.49 Ga and either are undeformed and massive or show weak deformation. They intruded into earlier, deformed rocks and are associated with undeformed, mantle-derived gabbroic and dioritic rocks of the same age. In western Shandong, for example, intrusive rocks older than 2.525 Ga commonly show strong deformation, whereas intrusive rocks younger than 2.525 Ga commonly are undeformed or only weakly deformed (Fig. 42). This suggests that the tectonic regime probably changed from compressional to extensional between 2.53 and 2.52 Ga (Wan et al. 2010c). Similar scenarios were proposed for other areas of the NCC such as Wutai and Zanhuang (Wilde et al. 2005; Yang et al. 2013a).

Fig. 42
figure 42

Zircon age variation diagram (with error bars) for different types of intrusive rocks in western Shandong. Data are from Lu et al. (2008) and Wan et al. (2010c)

It is also evident that migmatites occur on large scales and are associated with crustally derived granites in many areas such as western Shandong (Fig. 19). Migmatization occurred at the same time or slightly earlier than the formation of granites. Metamorphism and associated crustally derived granites were identified all over the NCC, including eastern Shandong, western Shandong, northern Liaoning, western Liaoning, eastern Hebei, Dengfeng, Yinshan, and Daqingshan, with metamorphic ages identical to crystallization ages of many crustally derived granites, mainly ranging from 2.53 to 2.49 Ga and 2.53 to 2.45 Ga, respectively (Fig. 43) (Bai et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2006; Cui et al. 2013; Dai et al. 2013; Deng et al. 2014; Dong et al. 2012a, b; Geng et al. 2006; Grant et al. 2009; Guan et al. 2002; Guo et al. 2013; Han et al. 2014a; Jahn et al. 2008; Jian et al. 2012; Kröner et al. 1998, 2005a; Li et al. 2009, 2010b, 2011a, b 2013a, b; Lu et al. 2008; Lü et al. 2012; Ma et al. 2013, 2013a; Nutman et al. 2011; Peng et al. 2012, 2013a, b; Ren 2010; Ren et al. 2013; Shen et al. 2004; Shi et al. 2012; Sun et al. 2010; Wan et al. 2005b, 2009c, 2010c, 2012b, d, 2015a, unpublished data; Wang et al. 2000, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014a, b; Wilde et al. 1997, 2005; Wu et al. 2013, 2014; Xie et al. 2013, 2014b; Yang et al. 2008, 2011; Zhang et al. 2011, 2012a, 2014; Zhao et al. 2002, 2008b 2009, 2011; Zhu et al. 2015). The association of undeformed, mantle-derived rocks (gabbro, diorite) of the same age (mainly 2.52–2.49 Ga) suggests that underplating may have played an important role in causing metamorphism and anatexis in the lower crust to produce crustally derived granites during extension in the NCC basement at the end of the Neoarchean. These magmas moved to higher crustal levels to form intrusive bodies at different scales, including syenogranites. The formation of large-scale granite batholiths and widespread high-grade metamorphism and anatexis are considered to have been important processes to cause cratonic stabilization of the NCC at the end of the Neoarchean, a convenient time to set 2.5 Ga as the Archean–Proterozoic boundary (Wan et al. 2012b, 2015a; Yang et al. 2011).

Fig. 43
figure 43

Weighted mean 207Pb/206Pb age histograms for magmatic zircons from crustally derived granites (a) and metamorphic zircons from high-grade metamorphic rocks (b) in the North China Craton. See text for interpretation and references

Metamorphic zircon ages are younger than magmatic zircon ages of crustally derived granites in some areas, down to 2.45 Ga or even later, although some may be the result of partial resetting of the U–Pb isotopic system in the zircons due to the strong late Paleoproterozoic tectono-thermal event. It is uncertain whether the metamorphism lasted from the late Neoarchean to the earliest Paleoproterozoic (~2.45 Ga) or whether the earliest Paleoproterozoic metamorphism was a different event. In western Liaoning, metamorphism was considered to be one event and lasted from the latest Archean to early Paleoproterozoic (Kröner et al. 1998; Liu et al. 2011a). In Daqingshan, however, the earliest Paleoproterozoic Daqingshan supracrustal sequence (mainly metasediments) contains 2.45‒2.40 Ga metamorphic zircons, suggesting that here the earliest Paleoproterozoic metamorphism was a separate tectono-thermal event.

Cratonic stabilization implies that the NCC was already a single tectonic unit at the end of the Neoarchean as suggested by Wan et al. (2011a), Zhai and Peng (2007), and Zhai and Santosh (2011). The Eastern and Western blocks and the TNCO share many common features, and some have been discussed before: (1) These tectonic units display almost identical late Neoarchean zircon age spectra with age peaks at ~2.52 Ga; (2) there is evidence for >2.8 Ga material, although this is more evident in the Eastern Block; (3) there are ~2.7 Ga TTGs in all three blocks; (4) there are ~2.5 Ga supracrustal rocks with similar rock associations with BIFs being typical components; (5) there was strong juvenile magma addition from mantle sources to the crust between 2.8 and 2.7 Ga; (6) there are abundant ~2.5 Ga TTGs, associated with minor gabbroic and dioritic rocks; (7) the old rocks underwent metamorphism and anatexis between 2.52 and 2.48 Ga; (8) crustally derived late Neoarchean granites occur in all three blocks and are commonly younger than the TTGs; (9) crustal recycling of ~2.7 Ga rocks at ~2.5 Ga played an more important role than juvenile addition; and (10) young sediments in different areas commonly contain late Neoarchean and late Paleoproterozoic detrital zircons.

In general, it is difficult to determine the original relationships between the different blocks just by comparing rock types and ages. Considering the limited distribution of the ~2.5 Ga tectono-thermal event worldwide, however, the obvious similarity of the Eastern and Western blocks may suggest that they formed in a similar tectonic setting, supporting the conclusion that the NNC had already been a single unit at the end of the Neoarchean.

5 Summary and Conclusions

  1. (1)

    The NCC underwent a long and complex evolution from 3.8 to 2.5 Ga. Rocks older than 2.8 Ga occur only locally, with Anshan and eastern Hebei being the most important areas where >3.8 Ga rocks and crustal components have been identified.

  2. (2)

    The most important tectono-thermal event in the NCC occurred at ~2.5 Ga, and this is different from many other cratons worldwide. However, whole-rock Nd and Hf-in-zircon isotopic compositions indicate that the late Mesoarchean to early Neoarchean is the most important period for rapid production of continental crust. This is similar to several other cratons.

  3. (3)

    The deep crust of the NCC shows similar evidence for the presence of ancient material as the surface exposures, and the available data suggest that the most important tectono-thermal events occurred in the late Neoarchean and late Paleoproterozoic, and juvenile material was added to the crust during the late Mesoarchean to early Neoarchean.

  4. (4)

    We suggest that three ancient terranes older than 2.6 Ga can be delineated in the NCC, namely the Eastern, Southern, and Central Ancient Terranes.

  5. (5)

    Vertical crustal growth is considered to have been the main mechanism of continental evolution prior to the Mesoarchean, and this is mainly based on geological features in the Anshan area. It is still uncertain whether magmatic underplating or arc magmatism played a decisive role in the evolution of the NCC during the late Neoarchean. We favor a multi-island arc model related to amalgamation through subduction/collision of different ancient terranes.

  6. (6)

    The NCC may have been a single tectonic unit at the end of the late Neoarchean, due to cratonic stabilization as indicated by the formation of widespread and voluminous granites and extensive high-grade metamorphism and anatexis all over the craton, probably as a result of mantle underplating.