Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selektion und Attraktion

Wie Organisationen und Bewerbende sich gegenseitig auswählen und beeinflussen

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

  • 616 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

„Der richtige Mensch am richtigen Platz“ – dies ist nicht nur für Organisationen wichtig, um von leistungsstarken Mitarbeitenden zu profitieren, sondern auch für Bewerbende, um einer erfüllten Arbeitstätigkeit nachgehen zu können. Damit eine hohe Passung gewährleistet ist, wählen sich Organisationen und Bewerbende gegenseitig aus. Gleichzeitig verfolgen Organisationen und Bewerbende das Ziel, ihre Auswahlentscheidungen gegenseitig zu beeinflussen – um die eigenen Chancen zu steigern, ausgewählt zu werden, aber auch um den Grundstein zu legen für eine langfristige Bindung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Anderson, N., Salgado, J. F., & Hülsheger, U. R. (2010). Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 291–304. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00512.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M., & Bergdolt, F. (2017). Internationale Karrieren von Erwerbstätigen. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W., Jr., Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., & Doverspike, D. (2006). The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: An assessment of its criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 786–801. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bangerter, A., Roulin, N., & König, C. J. (2012). Personnel selection as a signaling game. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 719–738. doi:10.1037/a0026078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 928–944. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dlouhy, K., & Biemann, T. (2017). Methodische Herausforderungen in der Karriere- und Laufbahnforschung. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, S., Farr, R. M., & Colbeck, L. (1978). Self-appraisal: A convergence of selection and guidance. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 51, 271–278. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1978.tb00423.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earnest, D. R., Allen, D. G., & Landis, R. S. (2011). Mechanisms linking realistic job previews with turnover: A meta-analytic path analysis. Personnel Psychology, 64, 865–897. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01230.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., Ryan, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1200–1208. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358. doi:10.1037/h0061470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E. A., Quaintance, M. K., & Broedling, L. A. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance: The description of human tasks. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frintrup, A. (2008). Die Personalpraxis braucht keine Norm – sie braucht solide Methoden. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 7, 181–183. doi:10.1026/1617-6391.7.4.181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493–511. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694–734. doi:10.5465/AMR.1993.9402210155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (1989). The effects of applicant impression management tactics on interviewer judgments. Journal of Management, 15, 557–564. doi:10.1177/014920638901500405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R. M. (2011). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausknecht, J. P., Trevor, C. O., & Farr, J. L. (2002). Retaking ability tests in a selection setting: Implications for practice effects, training performance, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 243–254. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639–683. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, A. (2017). Karriere- und Talentmanagement in Organisationen. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzenkamp, M., Spinath, F. M., & Höft, S. (2010). Wie valide sind Assessment Center im deutschsprachigen Raum? Eine Überblicksstudie mit Empfehlungen für die AC-Praxis. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 12, 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, M., Ryan, A. M., & Stierwalt, S. L. (2000). The influence of explanations for selection test use, outcome favorability, and self-efficacy on test-taker perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 310–330. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hossiep, R., & Paschen, M. (2003). Bochumer Inventar zur berufsbezogenen Persönlichkeitsbeschreibung (BIP). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184–190. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsheger, U. R., Specht, E., & Spinath, F. M. (2006). Validität des BIP und des NEO-PI-R: Wie geeignet sind ein berufsbezogener und ein nicht explizit berufsbezogener Persönlichkeitstest zur Vorhersage von Berfugserfolg. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50, 135–147. doi:10.1026/0932-4089.50.3.135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsheger, U. R., Maier, G. W., & Stumpp, T. (2007). Validity of general mental ability for the prediction of job performance and training success in germany: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 3–18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00363.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, P. V., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., & Melchers, K. G. (2015). Shall we continue or stop disapproving of self-presentation? Evidence on impression management and faking in a selection context and their relation to job performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 420–432. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.915215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Taskforce on Assessment Center Guidelines. (2015). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Journal of Management, 41, 1244–1273. doi:10.1177/0149206314567780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, A., König, C. J., Stadelmann, E. H., & Kleinmann, M. (2012). Applicants’ self-presentation behavior: What do recruiters expect and what do they get? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11, 77–85. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577–580. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanning, U. P. (2015). Personalauswahl zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelbetz, G., & Schuler, H. (2002). Verbessert Vorerfahrung die Leistung im Assessment Center? Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 1, 4–18. doi:10.1026//1617-6391.1.1.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, M. (2008). DIN Screen, Version 2. Leitfaden zur Kontrolle und Optimierung der Qualität von Verfahren und deren Einsatz bei beruflichen Eignungsbeurteilungen. In M. Kersting (Hrsg.), Qualitätssicherung in der Diagnostik und Personalauswahl – der DIN Ansatz (S. 141–210). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmann, M., Manzey, D., Schumacher, S. & Fleishman, E. (2010). F-JAS: Fleishman Job Analyse System für eigenschaftsbezogene Anforderungsanalysen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmann, M., & Klehe, U.-C. (2011). Selling oneself: Construct and criterion-related validity of impression management in structured interviews. Human Performance, 24, 29–46. doi:10.1080/08959285.2010.530634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, C. J., Klehe, U.-C., Berchtold, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2010). Reasons for being selective when choosing personnel selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 17–27. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00485.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. W. B., Kersting, M., Hülsheger, U. R., & Lang, J. (2010). General mental ability, narrower cognitive abilities, and job performance: The perspective of the nested-factors model of cognitive abilities. Personnel Psychology, 63, 595–640. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01182.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPolice, C. C., Carter, G. W., & Johnson, J. W. (2008). Linking O*NET descriptors to occupational literacy requirements using job component validation. Personnel Psychology, 61, 405–441. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00118.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422–427. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A. (2006). A model of faking likelihood in the employment interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 299–316. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00353.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A. (2007). Measuring faking in the employment interview: Development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1638–1656. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67, 241–293. doi:10.1111/peps.12052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., & De Paepe, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of interviewer-related factors that discourage the use of high structure interviews. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 29–46. doi:10.1002/job.246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., Sanchez, J. I., & De Corte, W. (2004). Easing the inferential leap in competency modelling: The effects of task-related information and subject matter expertise. Personnel Psychology, 57, 881–904. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00009.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., Buyse, T., & Sackett, P. R. (2005). Retest effects in operational selection settings: Development and test of a framework. Personnel Psychology, 58, 981–1007. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00713.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., Peeters, H., & Schollaert, E. (2008). Situational judgment tests: A review of recent research. Personnel Review, 37, 426–441. doi:10.1108/00483480810877598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B. (2011). Personalpsychologie. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, J. C., & Cable, D. M. (2014). Do interviewers sell themselves short? The effects of selling orientation on interviewers’ judgements. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 624–651. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. M., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Lievens, F., Kung, M.-C., Sinar, E. F., & Campion, M. A. (2013). Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 701–719. doi:10.1037/a0034089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Hartman, N. S., Whetzel, D. L., & Grubb, W. L., III. (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 63–91. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00065.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1981). Evidence and ethics in the evaluation of tests. ETS Research Report Series, 1981, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., & Ryan, A. M. (2009). Reacting to applicant perspectives research: What’s next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 431. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00484.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, R., & Höft, S. (2006). Standards der Assessment-Center-Technik – Version 2004: Überblick und Hintergrundinformationen. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 8, 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niessen, C., Hommelhoff, S., & Mäder, I. (2017). Arbeitsleistung im Kontext von Laufbahnentwicklung. In S. Kauffeld & D. Spurk (Hrsg.), Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, Revidierte Fassung (NEO-PI-R). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. R., Fleishman, E. A., Levin, K. Y., et al. (2001). Understanding work using the occupational information network (O*NET): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54, 451–492. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00100.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. M. (1998). Effects of realistic job previews on multiple organizational outcomes: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 673–690. doi:10.2307/256964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. L., BeVier, C. A., Switzer, F. S., III, & Schippmann, J. S. (1996). Meta-analyzing the relationship between grades and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 548–556. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & McFarland, L. A. (2005). A meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psychology, 58, 1009–1037. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00714.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2000). Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Pearlman, K. (1981). Task differences as moderators of aptitude test validity in selection: A red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 166–185. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.2.166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H. (1992). Das Multimodale Einstellungsinterview. Diangnostica, 38, 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., & Hell, B. (2005). Analyse des Schlussfolgernden und Kreativen Denkens: ASK. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., Hell, B., Trapmann, S., Schaar, H., & Boramir, I. (2007). Die Nutzung psychologischer Verfahren der externen Personalauswahl in deutschen Unternehmen – ein Vergleich über 20 Jahre. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 6, 60–70. doi:10.1026/1617-6391.6.2.60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374. doi:10.2307/1882010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumanth, J. J., & Cable, D. M. (2011). Status and organizational entry: How organizational and individual status affect justice perceptions of hiring systems. Personnel Psychology, 64, 963–1000. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01233.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J. T. (1981). Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Weigand, S., & Schuler, H. (2007). Die Validität von Schulnoten zur Vorhersage des Studienerfolgs – eine Metaanalyse. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 11–27. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.21.1.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P. (1976). Organizational entry: From naive expectations to realistic beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 22–29. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.1.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmy, A., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., Melchers, K. G., & Truxillo, D. M. (2016). How and why do interviewers try to make impressions on applicants? A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 313–332. doi:10.1037/apl0000046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmy, A., Kleinmann, M., Melchers, K. G., & Götz, M. (2017). Selling and smooth-talking: Effects of interviewer impression management from a signaling perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00740.

  • Zhao, H., & Liden, R. C. (2011). Internship: A recruitment and selection perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 221–229. doi:10.1037/a0021295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, Universität Zürich, Binzmühlestr. 14/12, 8050, Zürich, Schweiz

    Annika Wilhelmy & Martin Kleinmann

Authors
  1. Annika Wilhelmy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Kleinmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Wilhelmy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

    Simone Kauffeld

  2. Institut für Psychologie, Universität Bern, Bern, Germany

    Daniel Spurk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Wilhelmy, A., Kleinmann, M. (2016). Selektion und Attraktion. In: Kauffeld, S., Spurk, D. (eds) Handbuch Karriere und Laufbahnmanagement. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45855-6_7-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45855-6_7-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45855-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45855-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation