Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Warum müssen wir die akademischen Praktiken neu gestalten und wie geht das?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neugestaltung der Pädagogik und der Lehrplanpraxis im Hinblick auf den Online-Unterricht

  • 679 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Revolutionierung des Bildungswesens ist nicht nur das Gebot der Stunde, sondern auch das Sprungbrett für eine mühelose, papierlose Wissensvermittlung auf verschiedenen akademischen Ebenen. Die vorangegangenen Kapitel können als Vorstufe dessen betrachtet werden, was in diesem Kapitel behandelt wird. Die durch die Pandemie hervorgerufene Beschränkung hat der menschlichen Gesellschaft die grundlegenden Rechte auf Bewegung und Interaktion entzogen und uns damit auf das neue „Normal“ vorbereitet. Die Neukonzeption von Lehrplänen und Pädagogik als wesentliche Quelle für die Wiedergeburt eines fortschrittlichen Bildungssystems ist weltweit wieder zum Vorschein gekommen, und das Eintreten dafür mit der Kraft innovativer Technologie hat seine Wurzeln geschlagen. Auch wenn dies eine Herausforderung sein mag, so wurde doch bereits ein umfassender Leitfaden für die Umstrukturierung der Gesellschaft als Ganzes auf den Weg gebracht. In diesem Kapitel wird Folgendes aufzuzeigen versucht: (1) verschiedene Möglichkeiten, wie eine Neuformulierung des Lehrens und Lernens erfolgen kann; (2) die Überprüfung des traditionellen Prozesses und seiner Nachteile in Krisenzeiten; (3) den pragmatischen Ansatz des digitalen Lernens; sowie (4) das Zusammenwirken verschiedener Ressourcen, um nur einige zu nennen. Am wichtigsten ist, dass wir ein besseres Heute schaffen müssen, um eine qualifizierte Jugend auf das Morgen vorzubereiten, und dies muss durch die Bereitstellung eines effektiven Lehrplans und die effizientere Nutzung von Bildungsressourcen geschehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Wilson, P. S. (1971). Interest and discipline in education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dewey, J. (1971). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Counts, G. S. (1932). Dare the school build new social order. New York, NY: The John Day Company.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng-Man Lau, D. (2001). Analyzing the curriculum development process: Three models. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 9(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson, P. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 3–40). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eco-Schools (2020a). About eco-schools. https://www.ecoschools.global/how-does-it-work.

  8. Gadotti, M. (2010). Reorienting education practices towards sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(2), 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott, W. (2009). Judging the effectiveness of a sustainable school: A brief exploration of issues. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(1), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greene, M. (1995). Art and imagination: Reclaiming the sense of possibility. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(5), 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramirez, F. O., & Ventresca, M. (1992). Building the institution of mass schooling. In B. Fuller & R. Runinson (Eds.), The political construction of education (pp. 20–59). New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harwell, D. (2020). Mass school closures in the wake of the coronavirus are driving a new wave of student surveillance. Washington Post, 1 April. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/01/online-proctoring-college-exams-coronavirus/. Accessed 22 April 2020.

  13. Bates, T., & Sangrà, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: strategies for transforming teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2011). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cuban, L. (2004). The blackboard and the bottomline. Why schools can’t be businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cuban, L., & Jandrić, P. (2015). The dubious promise of educational technologies: Historical patterns and future challenges. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(3–4), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753015579978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knox, J., Williamson, B., & Bayne, S. (2020). Machine behaviourism: Future visions of ‚learnification‘ and ‚datafication‘ across humans and digital technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1623251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manolev, J., Sullivan, A., & Slee, R. (2019). The datafication of discipline: ClassDojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1558237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and learning analytics – It’s a DELICATE issue. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge – LAK ‘16 (pp. 89–98). https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883893.

  21. Corrin, L., Kennedy, G., French, S., Shum, B., Simon, K., Pardo, A., West, D., Mirriahi, N., & Colvin, C. (2019). The ethics of learning analytics in Australian higher education. A Discussion Paper. https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/research-projects/edutech/the-ethical-use-of-learning-analytics. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  22. Prinsloo, P. (2019). Learning analytics: Mapping a critique and agenda. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai, Y., Perrotta, C., & Gašević, D. (2019). Empowering learners with personalised learning approaches? Agency, equity and transparency in the context of learning analytics. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45, 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Teräs, H. & Teräs, M. (2019). Student-centered learning analytics development in higher education: Initial observations from needs analysis. In J. Theo Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 488–492). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/210419/. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  25. Williamson, B. (2020b). New pandemic edtech power networks. Code acts in education, 1 April. https://codeactsineducation.wordpress.com/2020/04/01/new-pandemic-edtech-power-networks/. Accessed 22 April 2020.

  26. Fernback, J. (2018). Academic/digital work: ICTs, knowledge capital, and the question of educational quality. tripleC, 16(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i1.878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fuchs, C. (2020a). Communicative socialism/digital socialism. tripleC, 18(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1144.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of digital reason. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital Dialogues. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Suoranta, J., & Vadén, T. (2010). Wikiworld. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bulfin, S., Johnson, N., & Bigum, C. (Eds.). (2015). Critical perspectives on technology and education. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Eynon, R., Ferreira, G., Knox, J., Macgilchrist, F., & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2020a). What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1694945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Selwyn, N., Pangrazio, L., Nemorin, S., & Perrotta, C. (2020b). What might the school of 2030 be like? An exercise in social science fiction. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1694944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Williamson, B. (2020). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1737556.

  35. Suoranta, J. (2020). Critical pedagogy and Wikilearning. In S. Steinberg & B. Down (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of critical pedagogies (pp. 1126–1138). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Giroux, H. A. (2020b). The plague of neoliberalism and the politics of pandemics. In B. Evans (Ed.), The quarantine files. Thinkers in Self-Isolation. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Review of Books. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/quarantine-files-thinkers-self-isolation/. Accessed 15 May 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed (50th Anniversary ed.). New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fuchs, C. (2020b). Communication and capitalism: A critical theory. London: University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book45.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Spinney, L. (2017). Pale rider: The Spanish flu of 1918 and how it changed the world. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Summers, W. C. (2012). The great Manchurian plague of 1910–1911: The geopolitics of an epidemic disease. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Jardine, D. (2012). Pedagogy left in peace: Cultivating free spaces in teaching. New York, NY: Continuum Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Arendt, H. (1969). Between past and future. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Aoki, T. T. (2005). Curriculum implementation as instrumental action and as situational praxis. In W. F. Pinar & R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 89–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hershock, P. (2012). Valuing diversity: Buddhist reflections or realizing a more global equitable future. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fowler, L. C. (2006). A curriculum of difficulty: Narrative research in education and the practice of teaching. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Miller, J. (2005). Sounds of silence breaking: Women, autobiography, curriculum. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pitt, A. (2003). The play of the personal: Psychoanalytic narratives of feminist education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  49. United Nations General Assembly. (2015, September 25). Resolution 70/1: Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E

  50. Butler, D., Leahy, M., Twining, P., Akoh, B., Chtouki, Y., Farshadnia, S., et al. (2018). Education systems in the digital age: The need for alignment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 473–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Erstad, O., & Voogt, J. (2018). The twenty-first century curriculum: issues and challenges. In J. Voogt, et al. (Eds.), Second handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 19–36). Springer International Handbooks of Education. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_1. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  52. Walsh, T. (2018). Towards an overview of a redeveloped primary school curriculum: Learning from the past, learning from others. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lawton, D. (1989). Education, culture and the national curriculum. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ontwikkelteam Digitale Geletterdheid. (2019). Concept-eindproduct van het Ontwikkelteam Digitale geletterdheid. Den Haag: Curriculum.nu.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gil, J. (2020). A pandemia e o capitalismo numérico [The pandemic and numerical capitalism]. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2020/04/12/sociedade/ensaio/pandemia-capitalismo-numerico-1911986.

  56. UNESCO (2015a). Rethinking education. Towards a global common good? Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Marope, P. T. M. (2017). Reconceptualizing and repositioning curriculum in the 21st century: A global paradigm shift. Geneva: UNESCO IBE.

    Google Scholar 

  58. OECD (2019a). OECD learning compass 2030. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Macdonald, B. J. (1995). Theory as a prayerful act. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pinar, W. (2019). Moving images of eternity: George Grant’s critique of time, teaching, and technology. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  62. Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2019). The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Peters, M.A., and P. Jandrić. 2019. AI, human evolution, and the speed of learning. In Artificial intelligence and inclusive education: Speculative futures and emerging practices, ed. J. Knox, Y. Wang, and M. Gallagher, 195–206. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8161-4_12.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Pinar, W. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pinar, W. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  66. Schwab, J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. The School Review, 78(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kliebard, H. M. (1970). Reappraisal: The Tyler rationale. The School Review, 78(2), 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Camus, A. (1991). The plague. New York, NY: Vintage Books. (Original work published in 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tay, L. Y., Melwani, M., Ong, J. L., & Ng, K. R. (2017). A case study of designing technology-enhanced learning in an elementary school in Singapore. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1350737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. (2011). National standards for quality online teaching (Version 2). Vienna, VA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.inacol.org/resource/inacol-national-standards-for-quality-online-teaching-v2

    Google Scholar 

  72. Morse, J. M. (2010). Simultaneous and sequential qualitative mixed method designs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A Panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219914708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Bovill, C., & Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education, 78, 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Bovill, C. (2020b). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79, 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2019b). „More than just a student“: How co-creation of the curriculum fosters Third Spaces in ways of working, identity, and impact. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., & Healey, M. (2018). Connecting learning, teaching, and research through student-staff partnerships: Toward universities as egalitarian learning communities. In V. C. H. Tong, A. Standen, & M. Sotiriou (Eds.), Shaping Higher Education with Students (pp. 23–29). London: UCL Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  81. Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Bovill, C. (2020a). Co-creating learning and teaching: Towards relational pedagogy in higher education. St Albans: Critical Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2019a). Creativity and collaboration: An exploration of empathy, inclusion, and resilience in co-creation of the curriculum. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 2(3), 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Digital technologies for promoting „student voice“ and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Kaur, A., Awang-Hashim, R., & Kaur, M. (2019). Students’ experiences of co-creating classroom instruction with faculty – A case study in Eastern context. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(4), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1487930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Riddell, J., Gadoury-Sansfaçon, G.-P., & Stoddard, S. (2021). Building institutional capacities for students as partners in the design of COVID classrooms. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Fawns, T., Aitken, G., & Jones, D. (2019). Online Learning as Embodied, Socially Meaningful Experience. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00048-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Jandrić, P. 2019. We-think, we-learn, we-act: The trialectic of postdigital collective intelligence. Postdigital Science and Education 1 (2): 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00055-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Jandrić, P., T. Ryberg, J. Knox, N. Lacković, S. Hayes, J. Suoranta, M. Smith, A. Steketee, M.A. Peters, P. McLaren, D.R. Ford, G. Asher, C. McGregor, G. Stewart, B. Williamson, and A. Gibbons. 2019. Postdigital dialogue. Postdigital Science and Education 1 (1): 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0011-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Burnapp, D., Farmer, R., Hansen Reese, S. V., & Stepniak, A. (2018). Co-creation, contexts, and complexity: A case study concerning blended learning. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v4i1.649.

  91. Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2019). Networked learning and postdigital education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0029-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2016). Co-creating curriculum in higher education: Promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1120734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Bron, J., Bovill, C., & Veugelers, W. (2016). Students experiencing and developing democratic citizenship through curriculum negotiation: The relevance of Garth Boomer’s approach. Curriculum Perspectives, 36(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00155-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff Student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. E. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176–188). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: An example of good practice in higher education? In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The Student Engagement Handbook: Practices in Higher Education (pp. 461–475). Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2020). An exploration of how curriculum co-creation advances student and staff aims for Scottish higher education. PhD Dissertation. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.7488/era/496.

  98. Kuh, G. D. (2010). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Jandrić, P., Hayes, D., Truelove, I., Levinson, P., Mayo, P., Ryberg, T., Monzó, L.D., Allen, Q., Stewart, P.A., Carr, P.R., Jackson, L., Bridges, S., Escaño, C., Grauslund, D.,Mañero, J., Lukoko, H.O., Bryant, P., Fuentes Martinez, A., Gibbons, A., Sturm, S., Rose, J., Chuma, M.M., Biličić, E., Pfohl, S., Gustafsson, U., Arantes, J.A., Ford, D.R., Kihwele,J.E., Mozelius, P., Suoranta, J., Jurjević, L., Jurčević, M., Steketee, A., Irwin, J., White, E.J., Davidsen, J., Jaldemark, J., Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Sinfield, S., Kirylo, J.D., BatareloKokić, I., Stewart, G.T., Rikowski, G., Lisberg Christensen, L., Arndt, S., Pyyhtinen, O., Reitz, C., Lodahl, M., Humble, N., Buchanan, R., Forster, D.J., Kishore, P., Ozoliņš, J.,Sharma, N., Urvashi, S., Nejad, H.G., Hood, N., Tesar, M., Wang, Y., Wright, J., Brown, J.B., Prinsloo, P., Kaur, K., Mukherjee, M., Novak, R., Shukla, R., Hollings, S., Konnerup,U., Mallya, M., Olorundare, A., Achieng-Evensen, C., Philip, A.P., Hazzan, M.K., Stockbridge, K., Komolafe, B.F., Bolanle, O.F., Hogan, M., Redder, B., Sattarzadeh, S.D., Jopling,M., SooHoo, S., Devine, N., & Hayes, S. (2020). Teaching in The Age of Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(2), 1069–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00169-6.

  100. Jandrić, P., Hayes, D., Levinson, P., Lisberg Christensen, L., Lukoko, H. O., Kihwele, J. E., Brown, J. B., Reitz, C., Mozelius, P., Nejad, H. G., Fuentes Martinez, A., Arantes, J. A., Jackson, L., Gustafsson, U., Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Sinfield, S., Hogan, M., Kishore, P., Carr, P. R., Batarelo Kokić, I., Prinsloo, P., Grauslund, D., Steketee, A., Achieng-Evensen, C., Komolafe, B. F., Suoranta, J., Hood, N., Tesar, M., Rose, J., Humble, N., Kirylo, J. D., Mañero, J., Monzó, L. D., Lodahl, M., Jaldemark, J., Bridges, S. M., Sharma, N., Davidsen, J., Ozoliņš, J., Bryant, P., Escaño, C., Irwin, J., Kaur, K., Pfohl, S., Stockbridge, K., Ryberg, T., Pyyhtinen, O., SooHoo, S., Hazzan, M. K., Wright, J., Hollings, S., Arndt, S., Gibbons, A., Urvashi, S., Forster, D. J., Truelove, I., Mayo, P., Rikowski, G., Stewart, P. A., Jopling, M., Stewart, G. T., Buchanan, R., Devine, N., Shukla, R., Novak, R., Mallya, M., Biličić, E., Sturm, S., Sattarzadeh, S. D., Philip, A. P., Redder, B., White, E. J., Ford, D. R., Allen, Q., Mukherjee, M., & Hayes, S. (2021). Teaching in the Age of COVID-19—1 Year Later. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 1073–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00243-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  102. Malin, H. (2018). Teaching for purpose: Preparing students for lives of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2131–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. APA [American Psychological Association] (2020). Human behavior in the time of COVID-19: Learning from psychological science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/human-behavior-in-the-time-of-covid-19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Springer Nature, Pune, Indien

    Anamica Sinha

Authors
  1. Anamica Sinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Springer Nature, Pune, India

    Anamica Sinha

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinha, A. (2023). Warum müssen wir die akademischen Praktiken neu gestalten und wie geht das?. In: Sinha, A. (eds) Neugestaltung der Pädagogik und der Lehrplanpraxis im Hinblick auf den Online-Unterricht. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39609-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39609-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39608-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39609-1

  • eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation