Skip to main content

Government Subsidies to News Media. Theories and Practices

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Media and Communication Economics

Abstract

Government support for news media and journalism is an important instrument of public media policy.

Typically, it comes as direct grants for one-off projects or is allocated indirectly as tax breaks for publishers and journalists.

These grants are handed out by government agencies which believe in the value of public interest news journalism to safeguard democratic infrastructure in a liberal Western democracy.

Support to news media is mainly targeted at traditional newspapers, magazines, and periodicals and also encompasses financial help to noncommercial radio and public service television broadcasting. Books, film, games, and online media services may also receive state handouts.

This paper argues that government support for public interest news media and quality journalism is a democratic duty of liberal democracies as this policy tool potentially strengthens media and opinion diversity in a country, stimulates the production of high-quality offerings, and supports their consumption.

However, the debates on media subsidies are controversial. The subsidy schemes offered are widely perceived as being both ineffective, inefficient, and unfair.

This study delivers a synoptic overview to key issues of government subsidies to news media, both theoretically and practically.

It finds that state media funding can plausibly be justified theoretically while revealing key deficits in its practicality. Current funding instruments and policies need to be improved to come to full effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media. Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Bó, E. (2006). Regulatory capture. A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollery, B., & Worthington, A. (1996). The evaluation of public policy: Normative economic theories of government failure. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 7(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragomir, M. (2018). Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep Media in Line. Journalism, 19(8), 1131–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragomir, M. (2019a). Media capture: When journalists and journalism are NOT the Problem. https://www.journalismfestival.com/programme/2019/media-capture-when-journalists-and-journalism-are-not-the-problem. March 2022.

  • Dragomir, M. (2019b). Media capture in Europe. Media Development Investment Fund. https://www.mdif.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/MDIF-Report-Media-Capture-in- Europe.pdf. March 2022.

  • Enikolopov, R., & Petrova, M. (2015). Media capture: Empirical evidence. In S. P. Anderson, J. Waldfogel, & D. Strömberg (Eds.), Handbook of media economics (Vol. 1b, pp. 687–700). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, T. L. (1999). The idea of public journalism. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (2006). Press Subsidies in the context of the information society. Historical perspective, modalities, concept and justification. In Press subsidies in Europe, edited by I. Fernandez Alonso, M. de Moragas, J. Blasco Gil, & N. Almiron (pp. 38–55). Institut de la Comunicacion, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, H. J., &Møen, J. (2015). Effects of taxes and Subsidies on media services. Discussion Papers from Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1991). The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1089–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (2010). Mass communication theory (6th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance. Mass communication and the public interest. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (2020). State aid for independent news journalism in the public interest? A critical debate of government funding models and principles, the market failure paradigm, and policy efficacy. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 720–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1732227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (2019). State-Supported Journalism. In T. Vos, & F. Hanusch (Eds.), ICA – International Encyclopaedia of Journalism Studies. Malden, MA.: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C. (2018). State aid for journalism: A highly contested terrain. European journalism observatory. https://en.ejo.ch/media-politics/state-aid-for-journalism-a-highly-contested-terrain, March 2022.

  • Murschetz, P. C. (2013). State aid for newspapers: First theoretical disputes. In P. C. Murschetz (ed.), State Aid for Newspapers. Media Business and Innovation (pp. 21–46). Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35691-9_2.

  • Murschetz, P. C. (1998). State support for the press: A critical appraisal – Austria, France, Norway and Sweden compared. European Journal of Communication, 1(3), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C., & Karmasin, M. (2013). Austria: Press Subsidies in search of a new design. In P. C. Murschetz (Ed.), State aid for newspapers. Media business and innovation (pp. 133–148). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35691-9_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, P. C., & Trappel, J. (2014). State aid for newspapers. A summary assessment. In P. C. Murschetz (Ed.), State aid for newspapers. Theories, cases, actions (pp. 375–393). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Society Foundations (2022). Program on independent journalism. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/who-we-are/programs/program-on-independent-journalism. March 2022.

  • Picard, R. G. (2016). Subsidised news sounds good but is no panacea to news industry challenges. Journal of Media Business Studies, 13(3), 136–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (2013). State support for news: Why Subsidies? Why now? What kinds? In P. C. Murschetz (Ed.), State aid for newspapers. Media business and innovation (pp. 49–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35691-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. G. (1991). Competitive effects of state press policies: An analytical framework for policy proposals, paper presented to the ‘political economy vs. Media economics’ workshop of the economy and future of print media research program, University of Salzburg, October 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruotsalainen, J., & Villi, M. (2018). Hybrid engagement: Discourses and scenarios of entrepreneurial journalism. Media and Communication, 6(4), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seethaler, J., & Beaufort, M. (2019). Recent developments on freedom and pluralism of media in Austria. In A. Giannakopoulos (Ed.), Media, freedom of speech, and democracy in the EU and beyond (pp. 116–130). S. Daniel Abraham Center for International and Regional Studies, Tel Aviv University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. B. (2018). Entrepreneurial Journalism. In T. P. Vos (Ed.), Handbooks of communication science: Journalism (pp. 349–366). De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjøvaag, H. (2010). The reciprocity of journalism’s social contract. Journalism Studies, 11(6), 874–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J., & Tomaz, T. (2021). The Media for Democracy Monitor 2021: How leading news media survive digital transformation (Vol. 1 and 2). University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855404-p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2018). Subsidies: Fuel for the media. In J. Trappel, L. D’Haenens, & H. Sousa (Eds.), Comparative media policy, regulation and governance in Europe. Unpacking the policy cycle (pp. 73–91). Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2015). Media Subsidies: Editorial Independence Compromised? In: S. Barnett, & J. Townend (Eds.), Media Power and Plurality. From Hyperlocal to High-Level Policy. Basingstoke (pp. 187–200). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J. (2007). The Austrian media landscape. In G. Terzis (Ed.), European media governance. National and regional dimensions (pp. 63–72). intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. (2015). Untold stories how corruption and conflicts of interest stalk the newsroom. European Journalism Network. http://www.ethicaljour-nalismnetwork.org/assets/docs/220/136/92a87dc-d968188.pdf. March 2022.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Clemens Murschetz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Murschetz, P.C. (2022). Government Subsidies to News Media. Theories and Practices. In: Krone, J., Pellegrini, T. (eds) Handbook of Media and Communication Economics. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34048-3_71-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34048-3_71-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-34048-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-34048-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics