Zusammenfassung
Egal in welchem Anwendungsbereich soziale Roboter zum Einsatz kommen, sie sind in jedem Fall dafür gemacht, mit Menschen zu interagieren. Die Psychologie als Wissenschaft menschlichen Denkens, Fühlens und Verhaltens kann im Austausch mit anderen Disziplinen daher wertvolle Beiträge zur Erforschung sozialer Roboter und zum Gelingen von Mensch-Roboter-Interaktion liefern. Ziel dieses Kapitels ist es, einen einführenden Einblick in die Besonderheiten psychologischer Zugänge zur Sozialen Robotik zu geben. Ausgewählte Themenfelder der Roboterpsychologie, darunter Anthropomorphismus, Technologieängstlichkeit oder Vertrauen in Roboter, werden theoretisch und empirisch beleuchtet. Da eine korrekte Einordnung von Forschungsergebnissen immer auch ein Verständnis zugrunde liegender Forschungsmethoden erfordert, geht ein weiterer Abschnitt darauf ein, wie psychologische Vorgänge wissenschaftlich untersucht und gemessen werden können. Mit der Frage „Brauchen Roboter Psychotherapie?“ widmen wir uns abschließend populären Falschvorstellungen zur Roboterpsychologie und diskutieren außerdem Potenziale und Risiken von Robotern als therapeutischen Begleitwerkzeugen.
Wo soziale Roboter sind, sind Menschen. Und wo Menschen sind, ist die Psychologie.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Aiello JR (1987) Human spatial behavior. In: Stokols D. Altman I (Hrsg) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York
Appel M, Weber S, Krause S, Mara M (2016) On the eeriness of service robots with emotional capabilities. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Christchurch, S 411–412
Appel M, Marker C, Mara M (2019) Otakuism and the appeal of sex robots. Front Psychol 10:569
Appel M, Izydorczyk D, Weber S, Mara M, Lischetzke T (2020) The uncanny of mind in a machine: humanoid robots as tools, agents, and experiencers. Comput Human Behav 102:274–228
Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) My robotic doppelgänger – a critical look at the uncanny valley. The 18th IEEE international symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, S 269–276
Belpaeme T (2020) Advice to new human-robot interaction researchers. In: Jost C, Le Pévédic B, Belpaeme T, Bethel C, Chrysostomou D, Crook N, Grandgeorge M, Mirnig N (Hrsg) Human-robot interaction. Evaluation methods and their standardization. Springer International Publishing, Cham, S 355–369
Burleigh TJ, Schoenherr JR, Lacroix GL (2013) Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Comput Human Behav 29:759–771
Conti D, Cattani A, Di Nuovo S, Di Nuovo A (2019) Are future psychologists willing to accept and use a humanoid robot in their practice? Italian and English students’ perspective. Front Psychol 10:2138
Costescu CA, Vanderborght B, David DO (2015) Reversal learning task in children with autism spectrum disorder: a robot-based approach. J Autism Dev Disord 45:3715–3725
De Visser EJ, Peeters MM, Jung MF, Kohn S, Shaw TH, Pak R, Neerincx MA (2020) Towards a theory of longitudinal trust calibration in human–robot teams. Int J Soc Robot 12:459–478
Döring N (2020) Sexpuppen und Sexroboter aus psychologischer und therapeutischer Perspektive; Pathogene und salutogene Nutzungsmuster. In: Bendel O (Hrsg) Maschinenliebe. Liebespuppen und Sexroboter aus technischer, psychologischer und philosophischer Perspektive. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, S 283–301
Döring N, Bortz J (2016) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften, 5. Aufl. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
Echterhoff G, Bohner G, Siebler F (2006) „Social Robotics“ und Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion. Z Sozialpsychol 37:219–231
Eichenberg C (2020) Robotik in der Psychotherapie: Anwendungsfelder–Effektivität–Praxisbeispiele. In Bessere Menschen? Technische und ethische Fragen in der transhumanistischen Zukunft. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, S 97–125
Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114(4):864
Esterwood C, Essenmacher K, Yang H, Zeng F, Robert L (2021) A meta-analysis of human personality and robot acceptance in human-robot interaction. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’21), May 8–13, 2021, Yokohama, Japan. ACM, New York (New York)
Eyssel F (2017) An experimental psychological perspective on social robotics. Robot Auton Syst 87:363–371
Eyssel F, Reich N (2013) Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots) – on the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI), Tokyo, S 121–122
Galvão Gomes da Silva J, Kavanagh DJ, Belpaeme T, Taylor L, Beeson K, Andrade J (2018) Experiences of a motivational interview delivered by a robot: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 20(5):e116
Gerrig RJ (2016) Psychologie, 20., akt. und erw. Aufl. Pearson Studium, Hallbergmoos
Gifford R (2013) Personal space and territoriality. In: Gifford R (Hrsg) Environmental psychology: principles and practice. Optimal Books, Colville, S 123–164
Hall ET (1966) The hidden dimension. Doubleday, Garden City
Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 57:243–259
Irfan B, Kennedy J, Lemaignan S, Papadopoulos F, Senft E, Belpaeme T (2018) Social psychology and human-robot interaction: An uneasy marriage. In HRI ’18 Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, S 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3173389
John OP, Srivastava S (1999) The big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin LA, John OP (Hrsg) Handbook of personality: theory and research. Guilford Press, New York, S 102–138
Kätsyri J, Förger K, Mäkäräinen M, Takala T (2015) A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Front Psychol 6:390
Klein RA, Ratliff KA, Vianello M, Adams RB, Bahník Š, Bernstein MJ, Nosek BA (2014) Investigating Variation in Replicability. Social Psychology 45(3):142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
Koerber M (2018) Theoretical considerations and development of a questionnaire to measure trust in automation. In: Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. Springer, Cham, S 13–30
Leichtmann B, Nitsch V (2020a) How much distance do humans keep toward robots? Literature review, meta-analysis, and theoretical considerations on personal space in human-robot interaction. J Environ Psychol 68:101386
Leichtmann B, Nitsch V (2020b) Is the Social Desirability Effect in Human–Robot Interaction overestimated? A Conceptual Replication Study Indicates Less Robust Effects. Int J Soc Robot 13:1013–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00688-z
Leichtmann B, Hartung J, Wilhelm O, Nitsch V (2021) New short scale to measure workers’ attitudes toward the implementation of cooperative robots in industrial work settings: Instrument development and exploration of attitude structure
Liang Y, Lee SA (2017) Fear of autonomous robots and artificial intelligence: Evidence from national representative data with probability sampling. Int J Soc Robot 9(3): 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0401-3
Lischetzke T, Izydorczyk D, Hüller C, Appel M (2017) The topography of the uncanny valley and individuals’ need for structure: a nonlinear mixed effects analysis. J Res Pers 68:96–113
MacDorman KF, Entezari SO (2015) Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interact Stud 16:141–172
Mara M, Appel M (2015a) Effects of lateral head tilt on user perceptions of humanoid and android robots. Comput Human Behav 44:326–334
Mara M, Appel M (2015b) Science fiction reduces the eeriness of android robots: a field experiment. Comput Human Behav 48:156–162
Mara M, Meyer K, Heiml M, Pichler H, Haring R, Krenn B, Gross S, Reiterer B, Layer-Wagner T (2021) CoBot Studio VR: a virtual reality game environment for transdisciplinary research on interpretability and trust in human-robot collaboration. In: International Workshop on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality for HRI (VAM-HRI), HRI’21, Boulder
Mathur MB, Reichling DB (2016) Navigating a social world with robot partners: a quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley. Cognition 146:22–32
McAllister DJ (1995) Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad Manag J 38:24–59
Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy 7:33–35
Naneva S, Sarda Gou M, Webb TL, Prescott TJ (2020) A systematic review of attitudes, anxiety, acceptance, and trust towards social robots. Int J Soc Robot 12:1179–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00659-4
Nass C, Moon Y, Carney P (1999) Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer – based interviewing systems. J Appl Soc Psychol 29:1093–1109
Nomura T, Kanda T (2003) On proposing the concept of robot anxiety and considering measurement of it. In: The 12th IEEE international workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003, S 373–378
Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251): aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Orne MT (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am Psychol 17:776–783
Picard RW (2003) What does it mean for a computer to „have“ emotions. In: Trappl R, Petta P, Payr S (Hrsg) Emotions in Humans and Artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, S 213–235
Powell AL (2013) Computer anxiety: comparison of research from the 1990s and 2000s. Comput Human Behav 29:2337–2381
Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rempel JK, Holmes JG, Zanna MP (1985) Trust in close relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 49:95
Rosenthal R (1966) Experimenter effects in behavioral research. Appleton-century-crofts, New York
Rotter JB (1967) A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J Pers 35(4):651–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x
Salem M, Lakatos G, Amirabdollahian F, Dautenhahn K (2015) Would you trust a (faulty) robot?: effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’15), Portland, OR, S 141–148
Schmidt-Atzert L, Amelang M (2012) Psychologische Diagnostik, 5. Aufl. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
Scoglio AA, Reilly ED, Gorman JA, Drebing CE (2019) Use of social robots in mental health and well-being research: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 21:e13322
Shibata T (2012) Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care. Proc IEEE 100(S):2527–2538
Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22(11):1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632v
SoftBank Robotics (2015) SoftBank to launch sales of ‚pepper‘ – the world’s first personal robot that reads emotions. https://www.softbank.jp/en/corp/group/sbm/news/press/2015/20150618_01/. Zugegriffen am 29.03.2021
Spielberger CD (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Inventory STAI. Mind Garden, Palo Alto, CA
Stein JP, Ohler P (2017) Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind – the influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting. Cognition 160:43–50
Stower R, Calvo-Barajas N, Castellano G, Kappas A (2021) A meta-analysis on children’s trust in social robots. Int J Soc Robot:1–23
Ullman D, Aladia S, Malle, BF (2021) Challenges and opportunities for replication science in HRI: a case study in human-robot trust. In: HRI ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, S 110–118
Waytz A, Cacioppo J, Epley N (2010) Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect Psychol Sci 5:219–232
Wolfert P, Deschuyteneer J, Oetringer D, Robinson N, Belpaeme T (2020) Security risks of social robots used to persuade and manipulate: a proof of concept study. In: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Cambridge, S 523–525
Zhang X, Mollahosseini A, Kargar BAH, Boucher E, Voyles RM, Nielsen R, Mahoor MH (2014) eBear: An expressive Bear-Like robot. 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Edinburgh, UK, 2014, S 969–974
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mara, M., Leichtmann, B. (2021). Soziale Robotik und Roboterpsychologie. In: Bendel, O. (eds) Soziale Roboter. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31114-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31114-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31113-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31114-8
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)