Skip to main content

The Contours of Religiosity in Hinduism: Locating Religious Doctrines, Interrogating Communal Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religiosity in East and West

Abstract

What accounts for the rise of aggressive communal violence in India? Does religious doctrines govern communal behaviors? What is the link between communal act with the spiritual principles, embedded within Hinduism? This chapter inquires into the contexts that govern religiosity in Hinduism. The first section, conceptualized religious fundamentalism as a form of religiosity. The second section, outlines the core principles from the sacred scriptures, which govern religiosity within Hinduism. The third section, describes the impact of the constitution of India on the religiosity in India. The fourth section, maps the contexts around which the changing forms of religiosity emerges. The fifth section. interrogates communal behaviors by taking into account religious doctrines. By reference to the theoretical framework of Allport and Ross (1967). This paper argues that, first, religiosity within Hinduism has both intrinsic and extrinsic character. Religious scriptures constitute the inherent dimensions of religiosity. Second, the Indian Constitution, judicial activism, the partition of India, commercialization of religion, and symbolism have impacted the religiosity within Hinduism and its religious-spiritual code. While the  performative aspects of religiosity superseded religious knowledge. Third, communal behavior stands contrary to the philosophies of the sacred text. Hence, communal action or religious bigotry should be looked at as the extrinsic dimension of religiosity as religion is ‘used’ for individual gains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is a custom among a few particular communities, where a woman immolates herself in the funeral pyre of her dead husband and practicing Sati can be termed as religiosity. A 19th-century social reformer spearheaded a social movement against this kind of religiosity as Raja Ram Mohan. Eventually, the Bengal sati regulation was passed on December 4, 1829, and banned Sati in India. Lord William Bentinck passed the act in 1829.

  2. 2.

    In general, after the death of husband, the widow is expected to live a life of a saint with austerity. They were boycotted from many religious festivals and were even regarded as unlucky. This practice was challenged by Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, who spearheaded a social movement to abolish these degrading customs. This led to the enactment of ‘The Hindu Widows’ Remarriage Act, 1856. Lord Dalhousie passed this draft legislation. This act removed the restriction on the remarriage of the widows.

  3. 3.

    One customary reason for the practice of child marriage was it secured the purity of the females. This practice let to an increase in the infant mortality rate. Children as young as five years were married by their parents. Social reformers, world opinions against child marriage were increasing. In 1927, Rai sahib Harbilas Sarda introduced this bill. Eventually, the child marriage restraint Act was passed in 1929. The act fixed the age of marriage between boys and girls, i.e. at 14 and 18, respectively. This was revised and increased to 18 for girls and 21 for boys.

  4. 4.

    The practice of Untouchability was a traditional feature of the Indian Caste system. The practice restricts physical touch with people belonging to certain caste or sub-caste groups. The notion of purity and pollution dominated this practice. It was widely believed that persons belonging to lower caste were less pure than upper caste individuals. There were cultural codes of intergroups interaction between members of high caste with members of lower caste.

  5. 5.

    The Constitution of India as on July 31 2018, Government of India.

  6. 6.

    Indian Young Lawyers Association and Ors. Vs. The State of Kerala and Ors. (28.09.2018 - SC): MANU/SC/1094/2018.

  7. 7.

    The India Spend database kept a record of  all cow-related violence from 2012–2017 available at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TcXbWPH3CGeMwXUfB3kb4IfV86K_uU2sC_q-Ca6UtQ4/pubhtml?gid=0&single=true.

  8. 8.

    Lok Sabha Starred question No 130. The question was asked to the home minister in Lok sabha and was answered on July 25 2017. Retrieved from https://164.100.47.190/loksabhaquestions/annex/12/AS130.pdf on May 15 2019 at 6 p.m.

References

  • Adeyemo, D., & Adeleye, A. (2008). Emotional intelligence, religiosity and self-efficacy as predictors of psychological well-being among secondary school adolescents in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v4i1.423.

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambedkar, B. (1979). Annihilation of caste. Mumbai: Education Department, Government of Maharashtra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (2005). Psychology and religion: An introduction. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bajzek, J., & Milanesi, G. (2006) Sociologia della Religione. Leumann-Torino: Elledici (previous versions in 1973 & 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergan, A., & McConatha, J. T. (2000). Religiosity and life satisfaction. Activities, Adaptation, and Aging, 24(3), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, P. (2003). The production of Hindu-Muslim violence in contemporary India. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. F., Faulkner, J. E., & Warland, R. H. (1976). Dimensions of religiosity reconsidered: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Social Forces, 54(4), 866–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, C. G., Gay, D. A., & Glass, T. A. (1989). Does religious commitment contribute to individual life satisfaction? Social Forces, 68(1), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/68.1.100.

  • Fukuyama, Y. (1960). The Major Dimensions of Church Membership (PhD dissertation). Divinity School: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2018, 31st July). The Constitution of India [As on 31st July 2018]. Retrieved 23rd April 2019, from The Constitution of India - Legislative Department: https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/COI-updated-as-31072018.pdf

  • Harshananda, S. (2000). Hindu scriptures: A brief anthology. Bangalore: Ramakrishna Math.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, R. (2007). On being religious: Patterns of religious commitment in muslim societies. The Muslim World, 97(3), 437–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.2007.00190.x.

  • King, J., & Williamson, I. (2005). Workplace religious expression, religiosity, and job satisfaction: Clarifying a relationship. Journal of management, spirituality & religion, 2(2), 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladriere, J., et al. (1988). Le concept de culture et les rapports entre la foi et la culture [The concept of culture and the relationship between faith and culture]. In P. Macq (Ed.), Foi et culture à Vuniversité catholique de Louvain (pp. 31–39). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhupada, A. B. (1991). Bhahgavad-gita: As it is. Bombay: The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., & Glock, C. Y. (1968). American piety: The nature of religious commitment. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivekananda, S. (1949). Salvation and service. Uttarakhand: Advaida Ahrama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivekananda, S. (2016). Hinduism. Chennai: Sri Ramakrishna Math.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1993). The sociology of religion. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debabrata Baral .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baral, D. (2020). The Contours of Religiosity in Hinduism: Locating Religious Doctrines, Interrogating Communal Behavior. In: Demmrich, S., Riegel, U. (eds) Religiosity in East and West. Veröffentlichungen der Sektion Religionssoziologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31035-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics