Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Messung von Stressbewältigung im Selbstbericht

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Stress und Kultur

  • 620 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Um Art und Häufigkeit von Stressbewältigungsstrategien in unterschiedlichen Kulturkreisen erfassen und vergleichen zu können, bedarf es äquivalenter Selbstberichtsinstrumente. In der Praxis werden jedoch häufig Fragebögen verwendet, denen der Nachweis transkultureller Validität fehlt. Das vorliegende Kapitel erläutert zunächst die Varianten und methodischen Herangehensweisen zur Überprüfung der Messäquivalenz, anhand derer der Nachweis kulturübergreifender Validität erbracht werden kann. Im Anschluss werden drei in der Forschungspraxis häufig genutzte Konzeptualisierungen von Stressbewältigung eingeführt, zugehörige Selbstberichtsverfahren für den Einsatz bei Erwachsenen vorgestellt und Befunde zu deren Äquivalenz für ausgewählte kulturelle Gruppen und Kulturkreise zusammengefasst. Zu jedem der drei Ansätze wird der Forschungsstand abschließend kritisch reflektiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Aldwin, C. M. (2007). Stress, coping, & development: An integrative perspective. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G. E., & Smith, T. B. (2015). Collectivistic coping strategies for distress among Polynesian Americans. Psychological Services, 12(3), 322–329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashktorab, T., Baghcheghi, N., Seyedfatemi, N., & Baghestani, A. (2017). Psychometric parameters of the Persian version of the brief COPE among wives of patients under hemodialysis. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 31, 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumstarck, K., Alessandrini, M., Hamidou, Z., Auquier, P., Leroy, T., & Boyer, L. (2017). Assessment of coping: A new french four-factor structure of the brief COPE inventory. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, G., Guillemette, A., & Landry-Léger, N. (2004). Situational and dispositional coping: An examination of their relation to personality, cognitive appraisals, and psychological distress. European Journal of Personality, 18(3), 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Lewensohn, O. (2013). Coping resources and stress reactions among three cultural groups one year after a natural disaster. Clinical Social Work Journal, 42(4), 366–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald, P. (2002). Dyadisches Coping in mündlichen Prüfungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald, P., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2004). Burnout aus ressourcentheoretischer Perspektive. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 51, 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald, P., & Lutz, S. (2006). Japanese adaptation of the strategic approach to coping scale. Poster auf der 27. Internationalen Konferenz der Stress and Anxiety Research Society (STAR) an der Universität Kreta, Rethymnon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 4, 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1994). Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 184–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, C., Moos, R. H., & Cronkite, R. C. (2006). Culture: A fundamental contest for the stress and coping paradigm. In P. T. P. Wong & L. C. J. Wong (Hrsg.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (S. 29–53). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comunian, A. L. (2003). Hobfoll’s strategic approach to coping: Reliability and validity of the Italian adaptation. Psychological Reports, 93(3), 1130–1132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connor-Smith, J. K., & Calvete, E. (2004). Cross-cultural equivalence of coping and involuntary responses to stress in Spain and the United States. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17, 163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connor-Smith, J. K., Compas, B. E., Wadsworth, M. E., Thomsen, A. H., & Saltzman, H. (2000). Responses to stress in adolescence: Measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 976–992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cousson-Gélie, F., Cosnefroy, O., Christophe, V., Segrestan-Crouzet, C., et al. (2010). The Ways of Coping Checklist (WCC). Validation in French-speaking cancer patients. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(8), 1246–1256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crasovan, D. I., & Sava, F. (2019). Translation, adaption and validation on Romanian population of COPE questionnaire for coping mechanisms analysis. Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., & Lischetzke, T. (2020). Statistische Methoden der Auswertung kulturvergleichender Studien [Statistical methods for cross-cultural research]. In T. Ringeisen, P. Genkova & F. T. L. Leong (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stress und Kultur (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eksi, H. (2004). Personality and coping: A multidimensional research on situational and dispositional coping. EDAM Egitim Danismanligi Ve Arastirmalari Merkezi, 4(1), 94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844–854.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P., Ai, A., Aydin, N., Frey, D., & Haslam, S. (2010). The relationship between religious identity and preferred coping strategies: An examination of the relative importance of interpersonal and intrapersonal coping in Muslim and Christian faiths. Review of General Psychology, 14, 365–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. (1986). The dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gnilka, P. B., Ashby, J. S., Matheny, K. B., Chung, Y. B., & Chang, Y. (2015). Comparison of coping, stress, and life satisfaction between Taiwanese and U.S. college students. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 37(3), 234–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P. (2008). Expanding the conceptualization and measurement of applied problem solving and coping: From stages to dimensions to the almost forgotten cultural context. American Psychologist, 68, 805–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., Heppner, M. J., Lee, D. G., Wang, Y.-W., Park, H.-J., & Wang, L.-F. (2006). Development and validation of a collectivist coping styles inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture and community. The psychology and philosophy of stress. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Alone together: Comparing communal versus individualistic resiliency. In E. Frydenberg (Hrsg.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions, and challenges (S. 63–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudek-Knezevic, J., Kardum, I., & Vukmirovic, Z. (1999). The structure of coping styles: A comparative study of Croatian sample. European Journal of Personality, 13, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, A. G., & Yeh, C. J. (2007). Asian American stress and coping. In F. T. L. Leong, A. Ebreo, L. Kinoshita, A. G. Inman, L. H. Yang & M. Fu (Hrsg.), Handbook of Asian American psychology (S. 323–339). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallasmaa, T., & Pulver, A. (2000). The structure and properties of the Estonia COPE inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 881–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimemia, M., Asner-Self, K., & Daire, A. P. (2011). An exploratory factor analysis of the brief COPE with a sample of Kenyan caregivers. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 33, 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmann, C.-W., & Eschenbeck, H. (2020). Stressbewältigung und Gesundheit: eine kulturvergleichende Perspektive [coping and health: A cross-cultural perspective]. In T. Ringeisen, P. Genkova & F. T. L. Leong (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stress und Kultur (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, B. C. H. (2011). Culture’s consequences on coping: Theories, evidences, and dimensionalities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 1084–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, B. C. H. (2012). Collectivism and coping: Current theories, evidence, and measurements of collective coping. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 374–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, B. C. H. (2014). Coping, acculturation, and psychological adaptation among migrants: A theoretical and empirical review and synthesis of the literature. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 2(1), 16–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, B. C. H., Roysircar, G., & Newby-Clark, I. R. (2006). Development of the cross-cultural coping scale: Collective, avoidance, and engagement coping. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 39(3), 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, F. T. L., Leung, K., & Cheung, F. M. (2010). Integrating cross-cultural psychology research methods into ethnic minority psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(4), 590–597.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, F. T. L., Kalibatseva, Z., & Somaraju, A. (2020). Evaluating Measurement Equivalence in Cross-Cultural Stress Research. In T. Ringeisen, P. Genkova & F. T. L. Leong (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stress und Kultur (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyne, K., & Roger, D. (2000). A psychometric reassessment of the COPE questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maehler, D. B., Behr, D., & Schneider, S. L. (2020). Kultursensitive Befragungen und Diagnostik: Gestaltung und Anwendung von Verfahren im interkulturellen Setting [culture-sensitive surveys and assessment]. In T. Ringeisen, P. Genkova & F. T. L. Leong (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stress und Kultur (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, K., Bentzen, N., & Touw-Otten, F. (1996). Cross-cultural issues: An outline of the important principles in establishing cross-cultural validity in health outcome assessment. In A. Hutchinson, N. Bentzen & C. König-Zahn (Hrsg.), Cross cultural health outcome assessment: A user’s guide (S. 34–40). Leuven: European Research Group on Health Outcomes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanraj, R., Jeyaseelan, V., Kumar, S., Mani, T., Rao, D., Murray, K., & Manhart, L. (2014). Cultural adaptation of the brief COPE for persons living with HIV/AIDS in southern India. AIDS and Behavior, 19(2), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnier, J., Hobfoll, S. E., Dunahoo, C. L., Hulsizer, M., & Johnson, R. (1998). There’s more than rugged individualism in coping: Construct and validity and further model testing. Part II. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 11, 247–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. D., & Endler, N. S. (1992). Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. European Journal of Personality, 6(5), 321–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedrero-Pérez, E., Angel Santed German, M., & Pérez-García, A. (2012). Spanish adaptation of Hobfoll’s Strategic Approach to Coping Scale (SACS). Psicothema, 24, 455–460.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perczek, R., Carver, C., Price, A. A., & Pozo-Kaderman, C. (2000). Coping, mood and aspects of personality in Spanish translation and evidence of convergence with English versions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74(1), 63–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, D. L., & Slane, S. (1996). Patterns of coping in racially stressful situations. Journal of Black Psychology, 22(3), 302–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelow, H. M., Tein, J.-Y., Roosa, M. W., & Wood, J. (2000). Do coping styles differ across socio-cultural groups? The role of measurement equivalence in making this judgment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 225–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ringeisen, T. (2008). Emotions and coping during exams: A dissection of cultural variance by means of the tripartite self-construal model. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M., & Yamasaki, K. (2005). Dispositional and situational coping and mental health status of University Students. Psychological Reports, 97(3), 797–809.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawang, S., Oei, T. P. S., Goh, Y. W., Mansoer, W., Markhum, E., & Ranawake, D. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Way of Coping Checklist-Revised (WCCL-R) in the Asian context. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 59(2), 202–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, S., & Ringeisen, T. (2020). Stressbewältigung im Kulturvergleich [coping from a cross-cultural perspective]. In T. Ringeisen, P. Genkova & F. T. L. Leong (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stress und Kultur (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, C., Starke, D., & Buchwald, P. (2003). Towards a theory-based assessment of coping: The German adaptation of the strategic approach to coping scale. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 16(3), 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sica, C., Novara, C., Dorz, S., & Sanavio, E. (1997). Coping strategies: Evidence for cross-cultural differences? A preliminary study with the Italian version of coping orientations to problems experienced (COPE). Personality and Individual Differences, 23(6), 1026–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siu, A. F. Y., & Chang, J. F. (2011). Coping styles and psychological distress among Hong Kong university students: Validation of the collectivist coping style inventory. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 33(2), 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolovskii, M., Solomonov, V. A., Fomina, E., & Banshchikova, T. (2019). Psychometrics of the Russian version of the SACS instrument. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 9(1), 438–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Sherman, D. K., Kim, H. S., Jarcho, J., Takagi, K., & Dunagan, M. S. (2004). Culture and social support: Who seeks it and why? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 354–362.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, R. G., & DeLongis, A. (2006). Problems and strategies when using rating scales in cross-cultural coping research. In P. T. P. Wong & L. C. J. Wong (Hrsg.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (International and cultural psychology, S. 203–221). Boston: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, R. G., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2004). Culture, stress, and coping: Internally- and externally- targeted control strategies of European-Canadians, East Asian-Canadians, and Japanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 652–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J. B., Kipke, M. D., Simon, T. R., Johnson, et al. (1998). Stress, coping, and social support among homeless youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13(2), 134–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utsey, S., Adams, E., & Bolden, M. (2000). Development and initial validation of the africultural coping systems inventory. Journal of Black Psychology, 26, 194–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, M. E., Gudmundsen, G. R., Raviv, T., Ahlkvist, J. A., McIntosh, D. N., Kline, G. H., Rea, J., & Burwell, R. A. (2004). Coping with terrorism: Age and gender differences in effortful and involuntary responses to September 11th. Applied Developmental Science, 8(3), 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, M., Heppner, P. P., Ku, T.-Y., & Liao, K. Y.-H. (2010). Racial discrimination stress, coping, and depressive symptoms among Asian Americans: A moderation analysis. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 136–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. T. P., & Wong, L. C. J. (Hrsg.). (2006). Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C. J., Arora, A. K., & Wu, K. (2006). A new theoretical model of collectivistic coping. In P. T. P. Wong & L. C. J. Wong (Hrsg.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (S. 55–72). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P., Yuan, L., Wang, D., Lew, B., Ping, F., & Jia, C. (2019). Reliability and validity of brief COPE Scale in medical college students. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 57(1), 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaff, J. F., Blount, R. L., Philips, L., & Cohen, L. (2002). The role of ethnic identity and self-construal in coping among African American and Caucasian American seventh graders: An exploratory analysis of within-group variance. Adolescence, 37(148), 751–773.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Administration, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Berlin, Deutschland

    Tobias Ringeisen & Saskia Schubert

Authors
  1. Tobias Ringeisen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saskia Schubert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Ringeisen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Administration, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Tobias Ringeisen

  2. Fakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Hochschule Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany

    Petia Genkova

  3. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Frederick T. L. Leong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ringeisen, T., Schubert, S. (2020). Messung von Stressbewältigung im Selbstbericht. In: Ringeisen, T., Genkova, P., Leong, F. (eds) Handbuch Stress und Kultur. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27825-0_17-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27825-0_17-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27825-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27825-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation