Skip to main content

Statistische Methoden der Auswertung kulturvergleichender Studien

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Stress und Kultur
  • 19k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das Kapitel gibt einen Überblick über statistische Verfahren der Auswertung kulturvergleichender Studien. Es werden Verfahren der Multigruppenanalyse (für feste Gruppen) und der Mehrebenenanalyse (für zufällig gezogene Gruppen) behandelt. Im Rahmen der Multigruppenanalyse wird gezeigt, wie das allgemeine lineare Modell und Modelle mit latenten Variablen zur Analyse von Unterschieden zwischen Nationen herangezogen werden können. Modelle mit latenten Variablen werden danach unterschieden, ob mit ihnen kontinuierliche oder kategoriale manifeste bzw. latente Variablen modelliert werden. So werden Modelle der konfirmatorischen Faktorenanalyse für kontinuierliche und ordinale beobachtete Variablen sowie Modelle der latenten Klassen- und Profilanalyse behandelt. Die Grundideen dieser Modelle werden beschrieben und es wird erläutert, was in diesen einzelnen Modellklassen unter Messinvarianz verstanden wird und wie diese überprüft werden kann. Abschließend werden Modelle der Mehrebenenanalyse sowohl für manifeste als auch latente Variablen vorgestellt und ihre Anwendbarkeit im Bereich der kulturvergleichenden Forschung diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandalos, D. L., & Leite, W. (2013). The use of Monte Carlo studies in structural equation modeling research. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Hrsg.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2. Aufl., S. 625–666). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J., Knott, M., & Moustaki, I. (2011). Latent variable models and factor analysis (3. Aufl.). London: Arnold.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. A., Morgan, G. B., Schoeneberger, J. A., Kromrey, J. D., & Ferron, J. M. (2014). How low can you go? An investigation of the influence of sample size and model complexity on point and interval estimates in two-level linear models. Methodology European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 10, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, E., & Meuleman, B. (2019). Measurement invariance analysis using multiple group confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimisation. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, F. Avvisati, E. Davidov, M. Eid, J.-P. Fox, N. le Donné, K. Lek, B. Meuleman, M. Paccagnella & R. van de Schoot (Hrsg.), Invariance analysis in large-scale studies (S. 13–20). OECD Education Working Papers No. 201. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M. (1995). Modelle der Messung von Personen in Situationen. Weinheim: PVU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M. (2019). Multigroup and multilevel latent class analysis. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, F. Avvisati, E. Davidov, M. Eid, J.-P. Fox, N. le Donné, K. Lek, B. Meuleman, M. Paccagnella & R. van de Schoot (Hrsg.), Invariance analysis in large-scale studies (S. 70–90). OECD Education Working Papers No. 201. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter- and intranational differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 869–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., Langeheine, R., & Diener, E. (2003). Comparing typological structures across cultures by latent class analysis: A primer. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2017). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden (5., korr. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feskens, R., & Hox, J. (2018). Multilevel structural equation modeling for cross-cultural research: Exploring resampling methods to overcome small sample size problems. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt & J. Billiet (Hrsg.), Cross-cultural analysis. Methods and applications (2. Aufl., S. 347–362). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, J. R. J. (2008). Traditional and multilevel approaches in cross-cultural research: An integration of methodological frameworks. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, D. A. van Hemert & Y. H. Poortinga (Hrsg.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (S. 65–92). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J.-P. (2019). Cross-cultural comparability in questionnaire scales: Bayesian marginal measurement invariance testing. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, F. Avvisati, E. Davidov, M. Eid, J.-P. Fox, N. le Donné, K. Lek, B. Meuleman, M. Paccagnella & R. van de Schoot (Hrsg.), Invariance analysis in large-scale studies (S. 36–69). OECD Education Working Papers No. 201. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. R., & French, B. F. (2013). Power analysis in covariance structure models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Hrsg.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2. Aufl., S. 117–159). Greenwood: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J., & Maas, C. J. M. (2001). The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, R. (2018). Using a differential item functioning approach to investigate measurement invariance. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt & J. Billiet (Hrsg.), Cross-cultural analysis. Methods and applications (S. 415–432). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankaras, M., Moors, G., & Vermunt, J. K. (2018). Testing for measurement invariance with latent class analysis. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt & J. Billiet (Hrsg.), Cross-cultural analysis. Methods and applications (S. 393–419). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lek, K., & van de Schoot, S. (2019). Bayesian approximate measurement invariance. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, F. Avvisati, E. Davidov, M. Eid, J.-P. Fox, N. le Donné, K. Lek, B. Meuleman, M. Paccagnella & R. van de Schoot (Hrsg.), Invariance analysis in large-scale studies (S. 21–35). OECD Education Working Papers No. 201. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2003). The influence of violations of assumptions on multilevel parameter estimates and their standard errors. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 46, 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2004). Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neerlandica, 58, 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, M., & Imahori, T. T. (2009). Profiling family communication standards: A U.S.-Japan comparison. Communication Research, 36, 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeish, D. M., & Stapleton, L. M. (2016). The effectof small sample size on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuleman, B., & Billiet, J. (2009). A Monte Carlo sample size study: How many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM? Survey Research Methodology, 3, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millsap, R. E., & Meredith, W. (2007). Factorial invariance: Historical perspectives and new problems. In R. Cudeck & R. MacCallum (Hrsg.), Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions (S. 130–152). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millsap, R. E., & Tein, J.-Y. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A. J. S., Meyer, J. P., Creusier, J., & Biétry, F. (2016). Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1983). Latent variable structural equation moderling with categorical data. Journal of Econometrics, 22, 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 376–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2014). IRT studies of many groups: The alignment method. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 978.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivera-Aguilar, M., & Rikoon, S. H. (2018). Assessing measurement invariance in multiple-group latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 439–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (2004). Lehrbuch Testtheorie – Testkonstruktion (2., vollst. überarb. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, Monograph Supplement No. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selig, J. P., Card, N. A., & Little, T. (2008). Latent variable structural equation modeling in cross-cultural research: Multigroup and multilevel approaches. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, D. A. van Hemert & Y. H. Poortinga (Hrsg.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (S. 93–119). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., & De Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52, 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (Hrsg.). (2008). Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. (2003). Multilevel latent class models. Sociological Methodology, 33, 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle & S. G. West (Hrsg.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (S. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Eid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eid, M., Lischetzke, T. (2021). Statistische Methoden der Auswertung kulturvergleichender Studien. In: Ringeisen, T., Genkova, P., Leong, F.T.L. (eds) Handbuch Stress und Kultur. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27789-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27789-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27788-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27789-5

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics