Abstract
Carving out the paradoxes of underground urban infrastructure, this paper attempts to establish a dialog between infrastructure studies, on the one hand, and Contradiction Studies, on the other hand. It starts from the premise that the technical and political characteristics of infrastructure are only thought of and made visible in case of failure or breakdown. It is thus only through their eventual absence that infrastructures gain a certain presence. This first paradox is both doubled and bedeviled in the case of underground infrastructure which, despite “lying low” in geographical terms, bars itself from being placed “underneath” in symbolic terms. It is argued that it is precisely the uncanniness of underground infrastructure that prevents the latter from being taken for granted and rendered invisible. The theoretical arguments are then illustrated by a discussion of AMFORA, a speculative urban design concept for the city center of Amsterdam. The paper concludes by discussing some of the lessons that can be learned from an exploration of the unhomely for a theorization of contradictions which aims at challenging simplistic conceptualizations of the contradictive.
It is one of the great paradoxes of urban life in the Global North that it often requires the collapse of the great, stretched-out infrastructures that sustain the city —the power grids, transport networks, water systems […]—for their critical importance to become manifest. Infrastructures—the largest urban architectures of all—often become most visible when they lie dormant or inactive—temporary ruins to the dreams of modernity, mobility, and circulation that underpin them.
(Graham 2010, p. XI)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Unless stated otherwise all quotations from non-English sources have been translated by the author.
References
Appadurai, Arjun. 2015. Foreword. In Infrastructural lives: Urban infrastructure in context, ed. Stephen Graham and Colin McFarlane, xii–xiii. Oxon: Routledge.
Berliner, David. 2017. Contradictions. From the interpersonal to the social, and back. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (2): 45–49. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.2.007.
Burgin, Victor. 1990. Paranoiac space. New Formations 12: 61–75.
Därmann, Iris. 1995. Drei Maskierungen im Unheimlichen: Husserl, Freud, Heidegger. In Phantasma und Phantome. Gestalten des Unheimlichen in Kunst und Psychoanalyse, ed. Martin Sturm, Georg Christoph Tholen, and Rainer Zendron, 81–93. Linz: Residenz.
Edwards, Paul N. 2003. Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In Modernity and technology, ed. Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg, 185–225. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Flitner, Michael, Julia Lossau, and Anna-Lisa Müller (eds.). 2017. Infrastrukturen der Stadt. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge: The discourse on language. New York: Pantheon.
Frank, Susanne. 2003. Die Domestizierung der wilden Natur. Stadt, Natur und Weiblichkeit am Beginn der modernen Stadtplanung: Das Beispiel Haussmann. Plurale. Zeitschrift für Denkversionen 2: 185–210.
Freud, Sigmund. 1955. The Uncanny. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. XVII: An infantile neurosis and other works. Translated by the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, and Angela Richards, 217–256. London: Hogarth (1919).
Freud, Sigmund. 1977. Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. New York: Norton.
Gandy, Matthew. 1999. The Paris sewers and the rationalization of urban space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 24: 23–44.
Gillis, Stacy (ed.). 2005. The matrix trilogy. Cyberpunk reloaded. London: Wallflower Press.
Graham, Stephen (ed.). 2010. Disrupted cities: When infrastructure fails. New York: Routledge.
Graham, Stephen, and Simon Marvin. 2001. Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
Graham, Stephen, and Colin McFarlane (eds.). 2015. Infrastructural lives: Urban infrastructure in context. Oxon: Routledge.
Hofmann, Roger, and Burkhardt Lindner. 1995. Traumbild und Trauma – Der Ort des Unheimlichen bei Freud. In Phantasma und Phantome. Gestalten des Unheimlichen in Kunst und Psychoanalyse, ed. Martin Sturm, Georg Christoph Tholen, and Rainer Zendron, 35–36. Linz: Residenz.
Hustak, Alan. 2017. Exploring Montreal’s underground city. Montreal: Véhicule Press.
Jansma, Rein. 2017. AMFORA Amsterdam. Alternative Multifunctional Subterranean Development Amsterdam. Solving spatial, infrastructural and environmental problems in the city. Case study presented on the ISOCARP Congress 2009: Low Carbon Cities. http://www.isocarp.net/Data/case_studies/1489.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr.
Kluge, Friedrich. 1989. In Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache, 22nd ed, ed. Elmar Seebold. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kramer, Caroline, and Anina Mischau. 1994. Tat-Orte und Angst-Räume – Sicherheitsheitsempfinden von Heidelberger Bürgerinnen. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 52 (4/5): 331–338.
Krell, David F. 1997. Archeticture. Ecstasies of space, time, and the human body. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lacan, Jacques. 1962. L’Angoisse. Unpublished seminar.
Lacan, Jacques. 1962/63. Die Angst. Seminar X. German translation. Manuscript copy.
Lacan, Jacques. 2016. In Anxiety. The Seminar by Jacques Lacan. Book X, ed. Jacques Lacan. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, Marianne, and Dagmar von Hoff. 2007. Travestie des Unheimlichen. In Eine Psychoanalyse für das 21. Jahrhundert, ed. Edith Geus-Mertens, 99–113. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Liehr, Günter, and Olivier Faÿ. 2000. Der Untergrund von Paris. Ort der Schmuggler, Revolutionäre, Kataphilen. Berlin: Ch. Links.
Lindner, Burkhardt. 1995. Die Unheimlichkeit des Traum-Blicks. In Phantasma und Phantome. Gestalten des Unheimlichen in Kunst und Psychoanalyse, ed. Martin Sturm, Georg Christoph Tholen, and Rainer Zendron, 43–48. Linz: Residenz.
Lippuner, Roland. 2011. Gesellschaft, Umwelt und Technik: Zur Problemstellung einer ‘Ökologie sozialer Systeme’. Soziale Systeme 17 (2): 308–335.
Lossau, Julia. 2002. Die Politik der Verortung. Eine postkoloniale Reise zu einer anderen Geographie der Welt. Bielefeld: transcript.
Lossau, Julia, and Katharina Winter. 2011. The social construction of city nature: Exploring temporary uses of open green space in Berlin. In Perspectives in urban ecology. Studies of ecosystems and interactions between humans and nature in the metropolis of Berlin, ed. Wilfried Endlicher et al., 333–345. Berlin: Springer.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1993. Risk. A sociological theory. Translated by Rhodes Barrett. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Luhmann, Niklas. 2012. Theory of Society. Vol. 1. Translated by Rhodes Barrett. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Marquardt, Nadine. 2017. Zonen infrastruktureller Entkopplung. Urbane Prekarität und soziotechnische Verknüpfungen im öffentlichen Raum. In Infrastrukturen der Stadt, ed. Michael Flitner, Julia Lossau, and Anna-Lisa Müller, 89–104. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Masschelein, Anneleen. 2002. The concept as ghost: Conceptualization of the uncanny in late-twentieth-century theory. Mosaic 35 (1): 53–68.
Masschelein, Anneleen. 2005. “Unheimlich/das Unheimliche.” In Ästhetische Grundbegriffe. Historisches Wörterbuch in sieben Bänden. Vol. 6, ed. Karlheinz Barck et al., 241–260. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Masschelein, Anneleen. 2011. The unconcept. The Freudian uncanny in late-twentieth-century theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Parks, Lisa, and Nicole Starosielski (eds.). 2015. Signal traffic: Critical studies of media infrastructures. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Simone, AbdouMaliq. 2004. People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture 16: 407–429.
Sioh, Maureen. 2015. Pricing dignity: Psychoanalytical frameworks and the burden of proof. In Approaches to human geography. Philosophies, theories, people and practices, ed. Stuart C. Aitken and Gill Valentine, 385–399. London: SAGE.
Star, Susan L. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–391.
Strukton. 2016. Strukton conceptualises city beneath Amsterdam. News, 29 January 2008. http://www.strukton.com/news/2008/strukton-conceptualises-city-beneath-amsterdam-/. Accessed 6 Jan.
van Laak, Dirk. 1999. Der Begriff ‘Infrastruktur’ und was er vor seiner Erfindung besagte. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 41: 280–299.
van Laak, Dirk. 2005. Infrastrukturen. Anthropologische und alltagsgeschichtliche Perspektiven. In Alltagsdinge. Erkundungen der materiellen Kultur, ed. Gudrun M. König, 81–91. Tübingen: Tübinger Verlag für Volkskunde.
Vidler, Anthony. 1992. The architectural uncanny. Essays in the modern unhomely. Cambridge: MIT Press.
von Meijenfeldt, Ernst, Marit Geluk, et al. 2003. Below underground level. Creating new spaces for contemporary architecture. Translated by Roz Vatter-Buck. Berlin: Birkhäuser.
Wells, Herbert G. 1950. The time machine. In Seven science fiction novels, ed. Herbert G. Wells. New York: Dover Publications. (London: William Heinemann, 1895).
Widmer, Peter. 2004. Angst. Erläuterungen zu Lacans Seminar X. Bielefeld: transcript.
Wigley, Mark. 1993. The architecture of deconstruction. Derrida’s haunt. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Williams, Rosalind. 2008. Notes on the underground. An essay on technology, society, and the imagination, new ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zwarts & Jansma Architects. 2017. Amfora, Amsterdam. City under the city in Amsterdam. http://www.zja.nl/en/page/1909/amfora-amsterdam. Accessed 30 Apr.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Arno Heitland for his input in the discussion of the urban underground. Arno Heitland completed his geography studies at the Humboldt University of Berlin in 2009. Drawing upon AMFORA as a case study, his thesis dealt with sustainability strategies in underground urban development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lossau, J. (2019). (In)Visible and (Un)Homely: Underground Infrastructures as Spaces of Dissension. In: Lossau, J., Schmidt-Brücken, D., Warnke, I. (eds) Spaces of Dissension. Contradiction Studies. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25990-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25990-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25989-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-25990-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)