Zusammenfassung
Ein Großteil der bestehenden Managementforschung zu dem Zusammenhang zwischen Einkaufspraktiken und Unternehmenserfolg basiert auf der Nettoeffekt-Annahme, dass spezifische Praktiken unabhängig voneinander Ergebnisse beeinflussen. Die vorliegende Studie stellt diese Kernannahme infrage, indem sie eine neokonfigurative Perspektive einnimmt und untersucht, wie verschiedene Kombinationen von Faktoren (sogenannte Konfigurationen) Ergebnisse bewirken. Eine weitere Limitation bestehender Studien zu dem Zusammenhang zwischen Einkaufspraktiken und Unternehmenserfolg ist der enge Fokus auf Einkaufspraktiken. Neuere verhaltenswissenschaftliche Beschaffungsmanagement-Forschung hat herausgefunden, dass das Verhalten von Managern entscheidend durch kognitive Karten beeinflusst wird, d.h. Filter, durch die Manager Informationen aus ihrer Umwelt wahrnehmen, vereinfachen und interpretieren. Mit Fokus auf die Lieferqualität untersucht diese Studie, wie Konfigurationen verschiedener Lieferantenqualitätsmanagement(LQM)-Praktiken und LQMbezogener kognitiver Karten Unternehmen helfen, ihre Lieferqualität zu managen. Methodisch nutzt diese Studie fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), um LQM-Konfigurationen zu identifizieren, und einen kognitiv-linguistischen Ansatz für die computergestützte Textanalyse der kognitiven Karten von Einkaufsmanagern. Im Kontext der Beschaffung westlicher Unternehmen von chinesischen Lieferanten identifiziert die konfigurative fsQCA Analyse vier verschiedene Konfigurationen beim Überwinden von Barrieren für das LQM in Schwellenländern. LQM-bezogene kognitive Karten erweisen sich als ein Kernelement in diesen vier Konfigurationen. Diese Zusammenfassung basiert auf einem Artikel, der im Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management erschienen ist (Kosmol et al., 2017), und ist sowohl für die Wissenschaft wie auch für die Praxis bestimmt.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Barney, J. (2012): Purchasing, supply chain management and sustained competitive advantage: The relevance of resource-based theory, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2), 3–6.
Busse, C.; Schleper, M.; Niu, M.; Wagner, S. M. (2016): Supplier development for sustainability: Contextual barriers in global supply chains, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(5), 442–468.
Carter, C. R.; Kaufmann, L.; Michel, A. (2007): Behavioral supply management: A taxonomy of judgment and decision-making biases, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(8), 631–669.
Carter, C. R.; Kosmol, T.; Kaufmann, L. (2017): Toward a supply chain practice view, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(1), 114–122.
Craighead, C. W.; Ketchen Jr., D. J.; Cheng, L. (2016): “Goldilocks” theorizing in supply chain research: Balancing scientific and practical utility via middle-range theory, in: Transportation Journal, 55(3), 241–257.
Crilly, D. (2011): Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory, in: Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 694–717.
Eckerd, S.; Boyer, K. K.; Qi, Y.; Eckerd, A.; Hill, J. A. (2016): Supply chain psychological contract breach: An experimental study across national cultures, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(3), 68–82.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989): Building theories from case study research, in: Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954): The critical incident technique, in: Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.
Foerstl, K.; Franke, H.; Zimmermann, F. (2016): Mediation effects in the ‘purchasing and supply management (PSM) practice–performance link’: Findings from a meta-analytical structural equation model, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(4), 351–366.
Gibbert, M.; Ruigrok, W.; Wicki, B. (2008): What passes as a rigorous case study?, in: Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474.
Greckhamer, T. (2016): CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country-level institutions, in: Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 793–815.
Greckhamer, T.; Misangyi, V. F.; Elms, H.; Lacey, R. (2008): Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects, in: Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 695–726.
Heide, J. B.; Wathne, K. H.; Rokkan, A. I. (2007): Interfirm monitoring, social contracts, and relationship outcomes, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 425–433.
Hofstede, G. (1984): Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values, 5th edition, Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Horn, P.; Schiele, H.; Werner, W. (2013): The ‘ugly twins’: Failed low-wage-country sourcing projects and their expensive replacements, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(1), 27–38.
Jia, F.; Rutherford, C.; Lamming, R. (2016): Cultural adaptation and socialisation between Western buyers and Chinese suppliers: The formation of a hybrid culture, in: International Business Review, 25(6), 1246–1261.
Johanson, J.; Vahlne, J.-E. (2009): The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership, in: Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.
Karatzas, A.; Johnson, M.; Bastl, M. (2016): Relationship determinants of performance in service triads: A configurational approach, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(3), 28–47.
Kaufmann, L.; Carter, C. R.; Rauer, J. (2016): The coevolution of relationship dominant logic and supply risk mitigation strategies, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 37(2), 87–106.
Kaufmann, L.; Wagner, C. M.; Carter, C. R. (2017): Individual modes and patterns of rational and intuitive decision-making by purchasing managers, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(2), 82–93.
Kaynak, H.; Hartley, J. L. (2008): A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain, in: Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 468–489.
Kim, H.; Hur, D.; Schoenherr, T. (2015): When buyer-driven knowledge transfer activities really work: A motivation–opportunity–ability perspective, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 33–60.
Kor, Y. Y.; Mesko, A. (2013): Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firmʹs dominant logic, in: Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 233–244.
Kosmol, T.; Reimann, F.; Kaufmann, L. (2017): Co-alignment of supplier quality management practices and cognitive maps – A neo-configurational perspective, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24(1), 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2017.11.002.
Kovach, J. J.; Hora, M.; Manikas, A.; Patel, P. C. (2015): Firm performance in dynamic environments: The role of operational slack and operational scope, in: Journal of Operations Management, 37, 1–12.
Krause, D. R.; Handfield, R. B.; Tyler, B. B. (2007): The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement, in: Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528–545.
Kull, T. J.; Wacker, J. G. (2010): Quality management effectiveness in Asia: The influence of culture, in: Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 223–239.
Lockström, M.; Schadel, J.; Moser, R.; Harrison, N. (2011): Domestic supplier integration in the Chinese automotive industry: The buyer’s perspective, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(4), 44–63.
Maitland, E.; Sammartino, A. (2015a): Decision making and uncertainty: The role of heuristics and experience in assessing a politically hazardous environment, in: Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1554–1578.
Maitland, E.; Sammartino, A. (2015b): Managerial cognition and internationalization, in: Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7), 733–760.
Martignoni, D.; Menon, A.; Siggelkow, N. (2016): Consequences of misspecified mental models: Contrasting effects and the role of cognitive fit, in: Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2545–2568.
Martin, T. W.; Jeong, E.-Y. (2017): Samsung blames Galaxy Note 7 overheating on problems at suppliers, in: The Wall Street Journal, January 22, 2017.
Misangyi, V. F.; Acharya, A. G. (2014): Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms, in: Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705.
Misangyi, V. F.; Greckhamer, T.; Furnari, S.; Fiss, P. C.; Crilly, D.; Aguilera, R. (2017): Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective, in: Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282.
Nadkarni, S.; Chen, J. (2014): Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction, in: Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1810–1833.
Najafi, N.; Dubois, A.; Hulthén, K. (2013): Opportunism or strategic opportunity seeking? Three approaches to emerging country sourcing, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(1), 49–57.
Noshad, K.; Awasthi, A. (2015): Supplier quality development: A review of literature and industry practices, in: International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 466–487.
Pagell, M.; Wu, Z. (2009): Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56.
Pennebaker, J. W.; Francis, M. E.; Booth, R. J. (2001): Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2001, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ragin, C. C. (2008): Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
RAPEX. (2017): Rapid alert system for dangerous products: 2016 annual report. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumers_safety/safety_products/rapex/alerts/repository/content/pages/rapex/reports/docs/rapex_annual_report_2016_en.pdf.
Reimann, F.; Kosmol, T.; Kaufmann, L. (2017): Responses to supplier-induced disruptions: A fuzzy-set analysis, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(4), 37–66.
Reinecke, J.; Ansari, S. (2015): When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments, in: Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–648.
Schoenherr, T.; Griffith, D. A.; Chandra, A. (2014): Knowledge management in supply chains: The role of explicit and tacit knowledge, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 35(2), 121–135.
Schorsch, T.; Wallenburg, C. M.; Wieland, A. (2017): The human factor in SCM, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(4), 238–262.
Shipp, A. J.; Edwards, J. R.; Lambert, L. S. (2009): Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1–22.
Soares, A.; Soltani, E.; Liao, Y.-Y. (2017): The influence of supply chain quality management practices on quality performance: an empirical investigation, in: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(2).
Stanczyk, A.; Cataldo, Z.; Blome, C.; Busse, C. (2017): The dark side of global sourcing: A systematic literature review and research agenda, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(1), 41–67.
Stanczyk, A.; Foerstl, K.; Busse, C.; Blome, C. (2015): Global sourcing decision-making processes: Politics, intuition, and procedural rationality, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 36(2), 160–181.
Steven, A. B.; Britto, R. A. (2016): Emerging market presence, inventory, and product recall linkages, in: Journal of Operations Management, 46, 55–68.
Tausczik, Y. R.; Pennebaker, J. W. (2010): The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods, in: Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.
Timmer, S.; Kaufmann, L. (2017): Conflict minerals traceability – a fuzzy set analysis, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(5), 344–367.
Vis, B. (2012): The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-N analyses, in: Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 168–198.
Wiengarten, F.; Ambrose, E. (2017): The role of geographical distance and its efficacy on global purchasing practices, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(7), 1141.
Xu, D.; Meyer, K. E. (2013): Linking theory and context: ‘Strategy research in emerging economies’ after Wright et al. (2005), in: Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1322–1346.
Zimmermann, F.; Foerstl, K. (2014): A meta-analysis of the ‘purchasing and supply management practice–performance link’, in: Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 37–54.
Zsidisin, G. A.; Petkova, B.; Saunders, L. W.; Bisseling, M. (2016): Identifying and managing supply quality risk, in: The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(3), 908–930.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kosmol, T. (2019). Qualitätsmanagement mit Lieferanten in Schwellenländern – Zusammenspiel aus Einkaufspraktiken und „kognitiven Karten“. In: Bode, C., Bogaschewsky, R., Eßig, M., Lasch, R., Stölzle, W. (eds) Supply Management Research. Advanced Studies in Supply Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23818-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23818-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-23817-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-23818-6
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)