Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Netzwerke in gesellschaftlichen Feldern: Problemaufriss und Forschungsüberblick

  • Chapter
Netzwerke in gesellschaftlichen Feldern

Part of the book series: Netzwerkforschung ((NETZFO))

  • 1864 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Diese Einleitung skizziert knapp den Rahmen für die verschiedenen Beiträge. Zunächst werden verschiedene gesellschaftstheoretische Perspektiven daraufhin beleuchtet, welche Rolle sie für soziale Beziehungsnetze vorsehen. Anschließend betrachten wir Studien zu Netzwerken in verschiedenen Teilbereichen und die aus ihnen entstandenen theoretischen Auseinandersetzungen mit Netzwerken. Es folgt ein Überblick über die Beiträge des Bands und ein Vorschlag einer Systematisierung der Perspektiven, die sie eröffnen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, Silke. 2008. Medieninhalte aus der Netzwerkperspektive. Neue Erkenntnisse durch die Kombination von Inhalts- und Netzwerkanalyse. Publizistik 53(2): 180-199.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, Helmut, Jürgen Gerhards, und Frank Romo. 1995. Forms of Capital and Social Structure in Cultural Fields: Examining Bourdieu’s Social Topography. American Journal of Sociology 100, 859-903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, Dirk 2005. Form und Formen der Kommunikation. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, Dirk. 2007. Studien zur nächsten Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassari, Delia, und Mario Diani. 2007. The Integrative Power of Civic Networks. American Journal of Sociology 113(3): 735-780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, Albert-László and Eric Bonabeau. 2003. Scale-Free Networks. Scientific American 288 (5): 50-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, Jens. 2010a. How Do Fields Change? The Interrelation of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets. Organization Studies 31(5): 605-627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, Jens. 2010b. Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Covergence and Divergence in Institutional Change. Sociological Theory 28(2): 150-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckfield, Jason. 2010. The Social Structure of the World Polity. American Journal of Sociology 115 (4): 1018-1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besio, Cristina. 2011. Netzwerke der Wissenschaft. In Netzwerke in der funktional differenzierten Gesellschaft, hrsg. M. Bommes und V. Tacke, 119-142. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bommes, Michael, und Veronika Tacke (Hg.). 2011. Netzwerke in der funktional differenzierten Gesellschaft, Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, Steve und Pacey Foster. 2003. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typologie. Journal of Management 29 (6): 991-1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottero, Wendy. 2009. Relationality and Social Interaction. The British Journal of Sociology 60(2): 399-420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottero, Wendy, und Nick Crossley. 2011. Worlds, Fields and Networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the Structures of Social Relations. Cultural Sociology 5 (1): 99-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1982. Die feinen Unterschiede. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1983: Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In Soziale Ungleichheiten, Soziale Welt, Sonderheft 2, hrsg. R. Kreckel, 183-198. Göttingen: Schwartz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1985. The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups. Theory and Society 14(6): 723-744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Vom Gebrauch der Wissenschaft. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre, und Loїc Wacquant. 1996. Reflexive Anthropologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Breiger [Brieger], Ronald. 1976. Career Attributes and Network Structure: A Blockmodel Study of a Biomedical Research Speciality. American Sociological Review 41 (1): 117-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald. 1995. Structural Holes. The Social Strcuture of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Dorwin und Frank Harary. 1956. Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider’s Theory. Psychological Review 63(5), 277-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society. Second Edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James. 1961. The Adolescent Society. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Diana. 1972. Invisible Colleges. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, Nick 2015. Networks of Sound, Style and Subversion; The Punk and Post-Punk Worlds of Manchester, London, Liverpool and Sheffield, 1975-80, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Nooy, Wouter. 1991. Social Networks and Classification in Literature. Poetics 20 (5-6), 507-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Nooy, Wouter. 2003. Fields and Networks. Correspondence Analysis and Social Network Analysis

    Google Scholar 

  • in the Framework of Field Theory. Poetics 31(5-6): 305-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Nooy, Wouter, und Jan Kleinnijenhuis. 2013. Polarization in the Media During an Election Campaign. Political Communication 30(1): 117-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Solla Price, Derek. 1965. Networks of Scientific Papers. Science 149 (3683): 510-515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diani, Mario, und Doug McAdam. Hrsg. 2003. Social Movements and Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul. 1986. Structural Analysis of Organizational Fields: A Blockmodel Approach. In Research in Organizational Behavior 8, hrsg. B. M. Staw und L. L. Cummings, 335-370. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul.1997. Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology 23: 263-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul. 1998. The New Institutionalisms: Avenues of Collaboration. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 154(4): 696-705.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul und Walter Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Norbert. [1969] 2002. Die höfische Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Christian, und Helmut Kuzmics. 1985. Einleitung. In Korruption. Zur Soziologie nicht immer abweichenden Verhaltens, hrsg. C.Fleck und H. Kuzmics, 7-39. Königstein/Taunus: Athenäum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, Neil. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, Neil und Doug McAdam. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Stephan. 2001. Against Essentialism. A Theory of Culture and Society. Cambridge/Massachussetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhse, Jan. 2008. Gibt es eine phänomenologische Netzwerktheorie? Geschichte, Netzwerk und Identität. Soziale Welt 59 (1): 31-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhse, Jan. 2011. Verbindungen und Grenzen: Der Netzwerkbegriff in der Systemtheorie. In Soziale Netzwerke, Zweite Auflage, hrsg. J. Weyer, 301-324. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhards, Jürgen und Helmut Anheier. 1987. Zur Sozialposition und Netzwerkstruktur von Schriftstellern. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 16(5): 385-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Roger. 1989. Power and Social Structure in Community Elites. Social Forces 68(2): 531-552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1974. Getting a Job. A Study of Contacts and Careers. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1992. Economic Institutions as Social Constructions: A Framework for Analysis. Acta Sociologica 35 (1): 3-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, Belver, und Nicholas Mullins. 1972. Coherent Social Groups in Scientific Change. Science 177 (4053): 959-964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Miles Kahler, und Alexander Montgomery. 2009. Network Analysis for International Relations. International Organization 63 (3): 559-592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, Fritz. 1946. Attitudes and Cognitive Organization. The Journal of Psychology 21 (1): 107-112,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, Petra. 2005. Korruption und Netzwerke. Konfusionen im Schema von Organisation und Gesellschaft. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 26 (1): 57-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, Boris. 2006. Netzwerke. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, Boris. 2008. Netzwerke und Systeme: Zum Verhältnis von Vernetzung und Differenzierung. In Netzwerkanalyse und Netzwerktheorie. Ein neues Paradigma in den Sozialwissenschaften, hrsg. C. Stegbauer, 155-164. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frank Janning, Philip Leifeld, Thomas Malang, und Volker Schneider. 2009. Diskursnetzwerkanalyse. Überlegungen zur Theoriebildung und Methodik. In Politiknetzwerke, hrsg. V Schneider, F. Janning, P. Leifeld, und T. Malang, 59-92. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, David. 1990. Political Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenn, Karoline. 2012. Alle Macht den Banken? Zur Struktur personaler Netzwerke deutscher Unternehmen am Beginn des 20.Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, Edward, und Franz Urban Pappi. 1976. Networks of Collective Action. New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, Edward, Peter Marsden, und Joseph Galaskiewicz. 1977. Community Influence Structures: Replication and Extension of a Network Approach. American Journal of Sociology 83(3): 594-631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laux, Henning. 2014. Soziologie im Zeitalter der Komposition. Weilerswist: Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifeld, Philip, und Sebastian Haunss. 2012. Political Discourse Networks and the Conflict over Software Patents in Europe. European Journal of Political Research 51(3): 382-409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leifeld, Philip, und Volker Schneider. 2012. Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science 53 (3): 731-744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Kurt. 1936. Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Seth, und Oscar Westlund. 2015. Actors, actants, audiences, and activities in cross-media news work. A matrix and a research agenda. Digital Journalism 3/1: 19-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieckweg, Tania, und Christof Wehrsig. 2001. Zur komplementären Ausdifferenzierung von Organisationen und Funktionssystemen. Perspektiven einer Gesellschaftstheorie der Organisation. In Organisation und gesellschaftliche Differenzierung, hrsg. V. Tacke, 39-60. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loosen, Wiebke, und Jan-Hinrik Schmidt. 2010. (Re-)Discovering the Audience: The Relationship between Journalism and Audience in Networked Digital Media. Information, Communication & Society 15/6: 867-887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Kausalität im Süden. Soziale Systeme 1 (1): 7-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 2011. Organisation und Entscheidung. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, Zeev. 2010. Networks of nations: The evolution, structure, and impact of international networks, 1816–2001. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Peter. 1983. Restricted Access in Networks and Models of Power. American Journal of Sociology 88(4), 686-717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, John Levi. 2003. What Is Field Theory? American Journal of Sociology 109 (1): 1-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, John Levi. 2011. The explanation of social action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug. 1986. Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer. American Journal of Sociology 92(1): 64-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, Daniel, James Moody, David Diehl, Jeffrey Smith, und Reuben Thomas. 2014. Network Ecology and Adolescent Social Structure. American Sociological Review 79(6): 1088-1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, Paul. 2011. Patrimonialism, Elite Networks, and Reform in Late Eighteenth Century Poland. The Annals of the American Association of Political and Social Science 636(1), 88-110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science. Science 159: 56-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John, und Brian Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, Mark. 1982. The American corporate network 1904-1974. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, Mark. 1996. What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates. Annual Review of Sociology 22 (1): 271–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, John. 2013. Bourdieu’s Relational Method in Theory and in Practice: From Fields and Capitals to Networks and Institutions (and Back Again). In Applying Relational Sociology, hrsg. F. Dépelteau und C. Powell, 101-135. New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, James, und Douglas White. 2003. Social Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Conception of Social Groups. American Sociological Review 8 (1): 1-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, James. 2004. The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review 69 (2): 213-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, Nicholas. 1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, Karl-Dieter, und Christiane Gern. 1993. Dissident Groups, Personal Networks, and Spontaneous Cooperation: The East German Revolution of 1989. American Sociological Review 59(5): 659-680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osa, Maryjane. 2003. Networks in Opposition: Linking Organizations Through Activists in the Polish People’s Republic. In Social Movements and Networks. hrsg. M. Diani und D. McAdam, 77-104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, John, und Christopher Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology 98(6), 1259-1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, John, und Paul McLean. 2006. Organizational Invention and Elite Transformation: The Birth of Partnership Systems in Renaissance Florence. American Journal of Sociology 111 (5): 1463-1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappi, Franz Urban, und Peter Kappelhoff. 1984. Abhängigkeit, Tausch und kollektive Entscheidung in einer Gemeindeelite. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 13(2): 87-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedazhur, Ami, und Arie Perliger. 2006. The Changing Nature of Suicide Attacks: A Social Network Perspective. Social Forces 84(4), 1987-2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter. 1990. Neither Markets nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. In Research in Organizational Behavior 12, hrsg. B. M. Staw und L. L. Cummings, 295-336. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter, und Paul DiMaggio. Hrsg. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter, Douglas White, Kenneth Koput, und Jason Owen-Smith. 2005. Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Inter-Organizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology 110 (4):1132-1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Marco, und Jan Fuhse. 2015. Zur Aktualität von Harrison White. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Wolfgang Ludwig, und Isabel Kusche. 2011. Parasitäre Netzwerke in Wissenschaft und Politik. In Netzwerke in der funktional differenzierten Gesellschaft, hrsg. M. Bommes und V. Tacke, 173-210. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Michael. 1987. The structure of power in America: The corporate elite as a ruling class. New York: Holmes & Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, John. 1991. Networks of corporate power: a comparative assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 181-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard. 1994. Conceptualizing Organizational Fields. In Systemrationalität und Partialinteresse, hrsg. H.U. Derlien/ U. Gerhardt/ F. Scharpf, 203-221. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Sourabh. 2016. What Is Relational Structure? Introducing History to the Debates on the Relation between Fields and Social Network Analysis. Sociological Theory 34(2): 128-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegbauer, Christian, und Roger Häußling. Hrsg. 2010. Handbuch Netzwerkforschung. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, Richard. 2003. Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton und Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, Richard. 2014. The Art of Social Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tacke, Veronika. 2000. Netzwerk und Adresse. Soziale Systeme 6 (2): 291-320. van Dijk, Jan. 2012. The Network Society. 3rd Edition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedres, Balázs, und David Stark. 2010. Structural Folds: Generative Disruption in Overlapping Groups. American Journal of Sociology 115 (4): 1150-1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, Brian. 1996. The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect American. Sociological Review 61(4): 674-698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Douglas, Jason Owen-Smith, James Moody, und Walter W. Powell. 2004. Networks, Fields and Organizations: Micro-Dynamics, Scale and Cohesive Embeddings. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 10 (1): 95-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Harrison. 1981. Where Do Markets Come From? American Journal of Sociology. 87 (3):

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Harrison. 1992. Identity and Control. Towards a Structural Theory of Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Harrison. 1993. Careers & Creativity. Social Forces in the Arts. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • 23

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Harrison. 2002. Markets from Networks: Socioeconomic Models of Production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Harrison. 2008. Identity and Control. How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenthal, Helmut. 2000. Markt, Organisation und Gemeinschaft als ‚zweitbeste’ Verfahren sozialer Koordination. In Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit, hrsg. R. Werle und U. Schimank, 44-73. Frankfurt a. M. und New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windolf, Paul, und Jürgen Beyer. 1995. Kooperativer Kapitalismus. Unternehmensverflechtungen im internationalen Vergleich. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 47/1: 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Deutschland

    Karoline Krenn & Jan Fuhse

Authors
  1. Karoline Krenn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Fuhse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karoline Krenn .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krenn, K., Fuhse, J. (2019). Netzwerke in gesellschaftlichen Feldern: Problemaufriss und Forschungsüberblick. In: Netzwerke in gesellschaftlichen Feldern. Netzwerkforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22215-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22215-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22214-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22215-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation