Abstract
The paper reflects upon Henry David Thoreau’s Walden; or, Life in the Woods and W.B. Yeats’ The Lake Isle of Inisfree. It aims at suggesting that the image of solitude and insulation pervading both works of literature functions as a good metaphor for the paradigm of judicial reasoning which is dominant among legal scholars, particularly among those who champion a prominent role of the judiciary in the interpretation of constitutional norms, as well as a control exercised by judges on other branches of government. This last assertion works as a methodological constraint for the paper, as I shall only be concerned with the way in which judges perform their duties in polities where judicial supremacy is the norm, i. e., where judges hold the final word in the interpretation of a constitution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexy, R. (2005). Balancing, constitutional review, and representation. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3(4), 572-581. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moi040
Alexy, R. (2014). Constitutional Rights and Proportionality. Revus, 22, 51-65. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.2783
Beetham, D. (1999). Defining and Justifying Democracy. In D. Beetham, Democracy and Human Rights (pp. 1-29). Polity Press.
Doherty, K., & Pevnick, R. (2013). Are There Good Procedural Objections to Judicial Review? The Journal of Politics, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613001084
Donnelly, T. (2012). Making Popular Constitutionalism Work. Wisconsin Law Review, 2012, 159-194.
Dworkin, R. (1981). The Forum of Principle. New York University Law Review(56), 469-518.
Dworkin, R. (1982). Law as Interpretation. Critical Inquiry, 9(1), 179-200.
Eisgruber, C. (2001). Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press.
Ely, J. (1980). Democracy and Distrust. A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press.
Ferejohn, J., & Pasquino, P. (2002). Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions: Towards an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice. In W. Sadurski (Ed.), Constitutional Justice: East and West (pp. 21-36). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Fish, S. (1982). Working on the Chain Gang: Interpretation in The Law and in Literary Criticism. Critical Inquiry, 9(1), 201-216.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. (W. Rehg, Trans.) Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
Hamilton, A. (1948). The Federalist LXXXIII. In The Federalist, or The New Constitution (pp. 424-436). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards Juristocracy. The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Harvard University Press.
Jefferson, T. (1819, September 6). Letter to Spencer Roane. Retrieved from Electronic resources from the University of Chicago Press Book Division: http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a1_8_18s16.html
Jefferson, T. (2008). The Essential Jefferson. (J. Dewey, Ed.) Mineola, New York.
Kramer, L. (2004). Popular Constitutionalism circa 2004. California Law Review, 92, 959-1012.
Kramer, L. (2004). The People Themselves. Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kramer, L. (2007). “The Interest of the Man”: James Madison, Popular Constitutionalism, and the Theory of Deliberative Democracy. Valparaiso Law Review, 41(2), 697-754.
Madison, P. o. (1789). Speech to the House of Representatives on the Removal Power of the President.
Marmor, A. (2014). The Language of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Muñiz, J. (2005). Estudio preliminar. República y libertad en el pensamiento político de James Madison. In J. Madison, & J. Muñiz (Ed.), República y libertad (J. Muñiz, Trans., pp. XI- LIII). Madrid: Centro de estudios políticos y constitucionales.
Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Thoreau, H. D. (1995). Walden; or, Life in the Woods. New York: Dover Publications.
Tomkins, A. (2010). The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution. University of Toronto Law Journal, 60, 1-22.
Tushnet, M. (1999). Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Waldron, J. (1999). The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whittington, K. (2007). Political foundations of Judicial Supremacy. The Presidency, the Supreme Cout, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurn, C. (2007). Deliberative Democracy and The Institutions of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hutt, D.B. (2018). Democracy, Law, Judges and Solitude. In: Kabashima, H., Liu, SI., Luetge, C., de Prada García, A. (eds) The Idea of Justice in Literature. Wirtschaftsethik in der globalisierten Welt. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21996-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21996-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-21995-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-21996-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)