Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft ((VGPO))

  • 713 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyzes constitutional politics in the Republic of Macedonia from its independence in September 1991 up until the end of 2014. Main factors influencing the constitutional development were the Greek resistance against the new-established state and ethnic tensions between the Slavic-Macedonian majority and the Albanian minority. The most comprehensive constitutional reform came as a result of the internationally mediated Ohrid Framework Agreement, which solved the armed conflict in the North-West of the country in 2001. Although the majority of all amendments between 1991 and 2014 dealt with civil rights and executive-legislative relations, Macedonia has still not succeeded in establishing a stable constitutional democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, the constitutional name ‘Republic of Macedonia’ is used, which is today also accepted by the majority of United Nations member states. For the Greek-Macedonian naming dispute, see Riedel (2005, 141ff.) and Bajalski (2010).

  2. 2.

    For further details on the diverging functions of constitutions in socialist and democratic systems, see Roggemann (1999, 41ff.) and Ajani (2005, 33ff.).

  3. 3.

    For the developments in the other post-Yugoslav countries, see the respective chapters in this volume.

  4. 4.

    This was also reflected in the formulation of the question in the independence referendum: “Are you in favor of a sovereign and independent state Macedonia, which has the right to join a coming union of sovereign states of Yugoslavia?” (State Election Commission 1991, translation J.T.).

  5. 5.

    Lorenz differentiates four categories: institutionalist, culturalist, historical-sociological, and rational-choice approaches.

  6. 6.

    Unfortunately, neither at the Website of the Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia (2015), nor in other sources are any data available on failed attempts to amend the Macedonian constitution. Therefore, this chapter is restricted to an analysis of the successful amendments.

  7. 7.

    The so-called ‘socio-political chamber’, the ‘chamber for representatives of the municipalities’, and the ‘chamber of associated labor’.

  8. 8.

    If not stated otherwise, all voting results are quoted from the Website of the Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia (2015).

  9. 9.

    Constitutional changes in Macedonia have been structured as consecutively numbered “Amendments”, starting with Amendment I in 1992, which have been attached to the original constitutional text (see Macedonia 2011a). With two exceptions, the amendments each contain only one changed article.

  10. 10.

    With the exception of being caught committing a crime for which a prison sentence of at least 5 years is prescribed.

References

  • Ajani, Gianmaria. 2005. Das Recht der Länder Osteuropas. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajalski, Borko. 2010. The name disputeMacedonia and Greece. Legal analysis of the dispute in relation to the UN Charter, the Interim Accord and Macedonia’s Integration to NATO and EU. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnbauer, Ulf. 2001. Doch ein historischer Kompromiß? Perspektiven und Probleme der Verfassungsreform in Makedonien. Südosteuropa 49: 346–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, Robert. 1992. Constitutional nationalism in the formerly Yugoslav republics. Slavic Review 51: 654–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister, Frank, and Arno Weckbecker. 1997. Die Entwicklung der politischen Parteien im ehemaligen Jugoslawien. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, Hans-Joachim. 1995. Die politische Szene der Republik Makedonien. Köln: Bundesinstitut für Ostwissenschaftliche und Internationale Studien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Astrid. 2008. Verfassungsänderungen in etablierten Demokratien. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, Dieter, and Philip Stöver. 2010. Elections in Europe: A data handbook. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OSCE, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. 2005. Former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia. 7 November 2004 Referendum. OSCE/ODIHR observation mission final report. Warsaw: OSCE. http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/fyrom/40863?download=true (accessed August 3, 2015).

  • Phillips, John. 2004. Macedonia: Warlords and Rebels in the Balkans. London: Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, Sabine. 2001. Minderheitenpolitik im Prozeß der EU-Erweiterung. Dynamisierung ethnischer Konflikte durch positive Diskriminierung. Osteuropa 51: 1261–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, Sabine. 2005. Die Erfindung der Balkanvölker. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roggemann, Herwig (ed.). 1999. Die Verfassungen Mittel- und Osteuropas. Einführung und Verfassungstexte mit Übersichten und Schaubildern. Berlin: Berlin-Verlag Spitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, Jens. 1993. Politik und Wirtschaft in Makedonien. Südosteuropa 41: 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer, Jochen. 2012. Politische Eliten in Slowenien und Makedonien. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen, Heinz. 1999. Machtwechsel in der EJR Makedonien. Südosteuropa 47: 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen, Heinz. 2010. Das politische System Makedoniens. In Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas, ed. Wolgang Ismayr, 967–1005, 3rd edn. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

Sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochen Töpfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Constitutional Politics in Macedonia 1991–2014

Appendix: Constitutional Politics in Macedonia 1991–2014

Dates of amendment and implementation

Articles

Constitutional subfields

Short analysis of the reform process

01/06/1992

Art. 3, 49

• Preamble and basic principles

• Human and civil rights

• Regular amendment by parliament with unanimous vote (final vote: 110-to-0 majority with 1 abstention)

• Main actors: main parliamentary parties, government

• Duration: about two months

07/01/1998

Art. 12

• Human and civil rights

• Regular amendment by parliament with unanimous vote (final vote: 90-to-0 majority without abstentions)

• Main actors: government, main parliamentary parties

• Duration: about three months

11/16/2001

Preamble, Art. 7–8, 19, 48, 56, 69, 77–78, 84, 86 104, 109, 114–115, 117, 131

• Preamble and basic principles

• Human and civil rights

• Judiciary

• Local self-administration

• State structure

• Regular amendment by parliament with broad two-thirds majority (94-to-8 majority with 1 abstention)

• Main actors: EU, USA, government, parliamentary parties, armed rebel group

• Duration: about 4 months

12/26/2003

Art. 17

• Human and civil rights

• Regular amendment by parliament with slightest possible two-thirds majority (80-to-5 majority without abstentions)

• Main actors: all parliamentary parties

• Duration: short

12/07/2005

Art. 13, 15, 84, 89, 91, 98–100, 104–106

• Human and civil rights

• Executive

• Judiciary

• Regular amendment by parliament with two-thirds majority (86-to-7 majority with 1 abstention)

• Main actors: governing parties

• Duration: about 1 month

01/09/2009

Art. 81

• Elections

• Regular amendment by parliament with unanimous vote (86-to-0 majority without abstentions)

• Main actors: government, governing parties

• Duration: about 1 month

04/12/2011

Art. 4

• Preamble and basic principles

• Regular amendment by parliament with unanimous vote, but slightest possible two-thirds majority (80-to-0 majority without abstentions)

• Main actors: government, governing parties

• Duration: about 4 month

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Töpfer, J. (2016). Macedonia. In: Fruhstorfer, A., Hein, M. (eds) Constitutional Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13762-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics