Abstract
This paper examines why natural selection is incapable of explaining social evolution, which instead requires a constructivist model. Natural selection reduces sociocultural systems to populations of traits, requires variation and selection to have distinct origins, and treats adaptation as the main explanatory principle. Constructivism, however, denies these assumptions as inappropriate to sociocultural systems. Here, variation and selection are linked together, and development occurs through an accumulation of various institutions. Because competition may often be low, these may be adaptively mediocre but, especially in combination, may still be the basis of further evolution. Necessary conditions for development include social size, sedentism, differentiated groups, and political centralisation. Social traditions, however, have core principles which may inhibit or facilitate evolutionary development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abercrombie, M., et al. 1973. The Penguin Dictionary of Biology. 6th ed. London:Penguin.
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. 1992. The Adapted Mind. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Boyd, R., and Richerson, P.J. 2006. Not by Genes Alone. How culture transformed the evolutionary process. Chicago University Press.
Claessen, H.J.M. 1978. ‘The early state: a structural approach’, in The Early State, eds. H.J.M. Claessen & P. Skalnik, 535-96. The Hague: Mouton.
Dumond, D.E. 1965. ‘Population growth and cultural change’, Southwestern Journal of anthropology, 21, 302–23.
Dux, G. 2011. Historico-Genetic Theory of Culture. On the processual logic of cultural change. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Fisher, H.A.L. 1936. A History of Europe. London: Arnold.
Goldman, I. 1970. Ancient Polynesian Society. Chicago University Press.
Hallpike, C.R. 1979. The Foundations of Primitive Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hallpike, C.R. 1984. ‘The relevance of the theory of inclusive fitness to human society’. Journal of Social and Biological. Structures. 7, 131–144.
Hallpike, C.R. 1986. The Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hallpike, C.R. 2008a.The Konso of Ethiopia. A study of the values of an East Cushitic society. AuthorHouse UK. Revised edition of 1st edition, 1972
Hallpike, C.R. 2008b. How We Got Here. From bows and arrows to the space age. Bloomington, Indiana: AuthorHouse.
Hallpike, C.R. 2011. ‘Some anthropological objections to evolutionary psychology’ in On Primitive Society, and other forbidden topics. 214-55. Bloomington, Indiana: AuthorHouse.
Harris, M. 1960. ‘Adaptation in biological and cultural science’, Transactions of the New York Academy of Science, 23. 59–65.
Lewis, H.S. 1974. ‘Neighbours, friends, and kinsmen: principles of social organization among the Cushitic-speaking peoples of Ethiopia’. Ethnology, 13. 145–57.
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., and Laland, K.N. 2004. ‘Perspective: Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species’, Evolution, 58(1). 1–11.
Sahlins, M. 1963. ‘Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: political types in Melanesia and Polynesia’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5(3). 285–303.
Straube, H. 1963. West Kuschitsche Völker Süd-Äthiopiens. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Tomasello, M. 2009. Why We Co-operate.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Trigger, B. 1990. Understanding Ancient Civilizations. Cambridge University Press.
Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural selection. A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hallpike, C. (2014). Constructivism and selection: two opposed theories of social evolution. In: Dux, G., Rüsen, J. (eds) Strukturen des Denkens. Neue Bibliothek der Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06255-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06255-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06254-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06255-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)