Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Of, for and by the people

Demokratie und Ungleichheit in den USA

Handbuch Politik USA

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften

  • 164 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel erläutert die Entwicklung sozialer, politischer und ökonomischer Ungleichheiten in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika im Laufe des 20. und 21. Jahrhunderts. Er leistet einen Überblick über die empirischen Details und die entscheidenden Faktoren und Dynamiken wachsender sozio-ökonomischer Ungleichheiten und bespricht deren Auswirkungen auf politische Prozesse. Wir argumentieren, dass die neuen Ungleichheiten nur erklärt werden können, wenn jüngere neoliberale Entwicklungstendenzen zusammengedacht werden mit ungelösten strukturellen Problemen des demokratischen Systems in den Vereinigten Staaten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gemeinhin spricht man in der einschlägigen US-amerikanischen Fachliteratur vom Wohlfahrtsstaat (welfare state) oder ausschließlich von Sozialpolitik. Wir verwenden bewusst den Begriff des Sozial- und Interventionsstaats, um auch nicht primär sozialpolitische Interventionsformen wie zum Beispiel Arbeitsmarkt-, Bildungspolitik oder auch die Regulierung der Finanzmärkte in den Blick zu nehmen.

Literatur

  • Bartels, Larry M. 2005. Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics 3(1): 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, Mark. 2011. Great transformations. Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2019. Union members – 2018. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf. Zugegriffen am 22.03.2019.

  • Carls, Josefine, und Helgard Kramer. 2013. Women. In USA-Lexikon. 2., völlig neu bearbeitete & wesentlich erweiterte Auflage, Hrsg. Christof Mauch und Rüdiger B. Wersich, 1137–1142. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foner, Eric. 2006. Forever free. the story of emancipation and reconstruction. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontenot, Kayla et al. 2017. Income and poverty in the United States: 2017. Cenus Bureau. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2018/demo/p60-263.pdf. Zugegriffen am 22.3.2019.

  • Fraser, Nancy. 1993. Clintonism, welfare, and the antisocial wage: The emergence of a neoliberal political imaginary. Rethinking Marxism 6(1): 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy, und Linda Gordon. 1992. Contract versus charity: Why is there no social citizenship in the United States? Socialist Review 22(3): 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabe, Thomas. 2013. Poverty in the United States: 2012, CRS report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1958. The affluent society. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilens, Martin. 2014. Affluence and influence. Economic inequality and political power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, Claudia, und Robert A. Margo. 1992. The great compression: The wage structure in the United States at mid-century. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(1): 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grell, Britta, und Christian Lammert. 2013. Sozialpolitik in den USA. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, Jacob S., und Paul Pierson. 2010. Winner-take-all politics: Public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States. Politics & Society 38(2): 152–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Michael. 1962. The other America: Poverty in the United States. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, Louis. 1955. The liberal tradition in America. New York/London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1981. American politics. The promise of disharmony. Cambridge/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Lawrence R., und Theda Skocpol, Hrsg. 2005. Inequality and American democracy. What we know and what we need to learn. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Michael B., und Mark J. Stern. 2001. Poverty in twentieth-century America.In America at the millenium project (Working Paper No. 7), 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Michael B., Mark J. Stern, und Jamie J. Fader. 2005. The new African American inequality. The Journal of American History 92(1): 75–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, Ira. 1981. City trenches. Urban politics and the patterning of class in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 2007. The conscience of a liberal. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Michael. 2010. The big short: Inside the doomsday machine. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour M. 1979. The first new nation: The United States in historical and comparative perspective. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Thomas H. 1992. Bürgerrechte und soziale Klassen. Zur Soziologie des Wohlfahrtsstaates. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1965. The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research/US Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, Gunnar. 1944. An American dilemma. The Negro problem and modern democracy. New York/London: Harper & Brothers Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Barbara. 1990. The origins of the two-channel welfare state: Workmen’s compensation and mothers’ aid. In Women, the State, and Welfare, Hrsg. Linda Gordon, 123–151. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2011. Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising country note: United States. OECD. www.oecd.org/els/soc/49170253.pdf.

  • OECD. 2018. A broken social elevator? How to promote social mobility? OECD. http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/broken-elevator-how-to-promote-social-mobility-9789264301085-en.htm. Zugegriffen am 22.03.2019.

  • Peck, Jamie. 2001. Workfare states. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perman, Michael. 2001. Struggle for mastery: Disfranchisement in the south, 1888–1908. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Charitable Trusts. 2013. Moving on up. Why do some Americans leave the bottom of the economic ladder, but not others? Pew Charitable Trusts, November. www.pewstates.org/uploadedFiles/PCS/Content-Level_Pages/Reports/2013/Moving_On_Up.pdf.

  • Pew Research Center. 2015. Beyond distrust. How Americans view their government. https://www.people-press.org/2015/11/23/beyond-distrust-how-americans-view-their-government/. Zugegriffen am 22.03.2019.

  • Reich, Robert. 2007. Supercapitalism. The transformation of business, democracy, and everyday life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saez, Emmanuel. 2013. Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States (Updated with 2012 preliminary estimates). September 3. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2012.pdf.

  • Sassen, Saskia. 2007. A sociology of globalization. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Benjamin I. Page, Sidney Verba, und Morris P. Fiorina. 2005. Inequalities of political voice. In Inequality and American democracy, Hrsg. Lawrence Jacobs und Theda Skocpol, 19–87. New York: Russal Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Roger M. 1993. Beyond Tocquille, Myrdal, and Hartz: The multiple traditions in America. The American Political Science Review 87(3): 549–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Roger M. 1997. Civic ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in U.S. history. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Chad et al. 2018. A guide to statistics on gistorical trends in income inequality. Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and-inequality/a-guide-to-statistics-on-historical-trends-in-income-inequality. Zugegriffen am 22.01.2019.

  • Vormann, Boris. 2012. Zwischen Alter & Neuer Welt. Nationenbildung im transatlantischen Raum. Heidelberg: Synchron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. Kent. 2000. Ending welfare as we know it. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, Bruce, und Jake Rosenfeld. 2011. Unions, norms, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. American Sociological Review 76(4): 513–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. JFKI, FU Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Christian Lammert

  2. Bard College Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Boris Vormann

Authors
  1. Christian Lammert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Boris Vormann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Lammert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Christan Lammert

  2. Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

    Markus Siewert

  3. JFK Institut für Nordamerikastudien Abteilung Politik, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Boris Vormann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lammert, C., Vormann, B. (2020). Of, for and by the people. In: Lammert, C., Siewert, M., Vormann, B. (eds) Handbuch Politik USA. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_36-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_36-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04125-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04125-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Ungleichheiten und die US-amerikanische Demokratie
    Published:
    14 June 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_36-3

  2. Of, for and by the people
    Published:
    03 December 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_36-2

  3. Original

    Gesellschaft in der Krise? Neue Ungleichheiten in den USA
    Published:
    02 September 2014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_36-1

Search

Navigation