Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leadership im Wissenszeitalter – eine empirische Follow-up Studie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategie und Leadership

  • 9408 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag werden folgende vier Thesen, die von Müller, Renzl, Hinterhuber und Lakomski (2007) zum Thema Führung im Wissenszeitalter aufgestellt wurden, in einer empirischen Studie überprüft: (1) Leadership ist persönliche Führungsleistung plus Leistung des Teams; (2) Leadership ist eine Kombination von Führung von oben und Verteilung der Führungsbefugnisse im Unternehmen; (3) Transformational Leadership ist im Wissenszeitalter wichtiger als Transactional Leadership; (4) Das Unternehmen der Zukunft ist eine Leadership Company. Dazu wurde eine qualitative Studie in einem wissensintensiven Unternehmen durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse bestätigen die aufgestellten Hypothesen und liefern Einblicke zum aktuellen Stand der Führungsforschung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Abfalter, D./Hinterhuber, H. H. (2010): Der Einfluss authentischen Führungsverhaltens auf den wahrgenommenen Erfolg im Kulturbetrieb. In: Pechlaner, H./Raich, M./Schön, S./Matzler, K. (Hrsg.): Change Leadership: Den Wandel antizipieren und aktiv gestalten. Wiesbaden, S. 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abfalter, D./Stadler, R./Mueller, J. (2012): Organizing knowledge sharing at the Colorado Music Festival. In: International Journal of Arts Management 14 (3), S. 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (2004): Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J. (2007): Promoting More Integrative Strategies for Leadership Theorybuilding. In: American Psychology 62, S. 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J./Bass, B. M./Jung, D. I. (1999): Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. In: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 72 (4), S. 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J./Luthans, F. (2006): The high impact leader: Moments matter in accelerating authentic leadership. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J./Walumbwa, F./Weber, T. J. (2009): Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions. In: Annual Review of Psychology 60, S. 421–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, J. L. (1991): The knowledge link – How firms compete through strategic alliances. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartol, K. M./Srivastava, A. (2002): Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. In: Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 9 (1), S. 64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985): Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990): From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision. In: Organizational Dynamics 18 (3), S. 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1973): Die Nachindustrielle Gesellschaft. Reinbeck bei Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1990): Führen lernen. Führungskräfte werden gemacht, nicht geboren. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F. (1995): Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations – An overview and interpretation. In: Organization Studies 16 (6), S. 1021–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1992): Charisma and Leadership in Organizations. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978): Leadership. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. B./Tesluk, P. E./Marrone, J. A. (2007): Shared Leadership in Teams:An Investigation of Antecedent Conditions and Performance. In: Academy of Management Journal 50 (5), S. 1217–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A./Kanungo, R. N. (1987): Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings. In: Academy of Management Review 12 (4), S. 637–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E./Kennedy, A. A. (1982): Corporate cultures – The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, J.-L./Langley, A./Sergi, V. (2012): Leadership in the Plural. In: Academy of Management Annals 6 (1), S. 211–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1990): Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drath, W. H./McCauley, C. D./Palus, C. J./Van Velsor, E./O’Connor, P. M. G./McGuire, J. B. (2008): Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. In: Leadership Quarterly 19 (6), S. 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1998): Wissen – die Trumpfkarte der entwickelten Länder – In den Industrieländern schrumpft die Bevölkerung. Der Produktionsfaktor Wissen muss daher systematisch verstärkt und genutzt werden. In: Harvard Business Manager 20 (4), S. 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L. (2004): The new knowledge landscape. In: Crainer, S./Dearlove, D. (Hrsg.): Financial Times handbook of management. 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D./Hmieleski, K. M./Pearce, C. L. (2006): The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. In: Leadership Quarterly 17 (3), S. 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felfe, J. (2006): Transformationale und Charismatische Führung – Stand der Forschung und aktuelle Entwicklungen. In: Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 5 (4), S. 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L./Avolio, B. J./Walumbwa, F. O. (2009): Authentic Leadership Theory and Practice: Origins, Effects and Development. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, B./Sims, P./McLean, A. N./Mayer, D. (2007): Discovering Your Authentic Leadership. In: Harvard Business Review 85 (2), S. 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C. R./Day, D. V. (1997): Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. In: Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (6), S. 827–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1997): The knowledge-based view of the firm – Implications for management practice. In: Long Range Planning 30 (3), S. 450–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote, S. (2012): Die Zukunft der Führung. Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K./Govindarajan, V. (2000): Knowledge management social dimension: lessons from Nucor Steel. In: Sloan Management Review 42 (1), S. 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2004): Strategische Unternehmungsführung, Band 2. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber, H. H. (2013): Führen mit strategischer Teilhabe. In: Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1984): Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991): Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. (1977): A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership. In: Hunt, J. G./Larson, L. L. (Hrsg.): Leadership: The Cutting Edge. Carbondale, S. 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J./Shamir, B. (1993): Towards the Integration of Transformational, Charismatic, and Visionary Theories. In: Chemers, M. M./Ayman, R. (Hrsg.): Leadership Theory and Research. San Diego, CA, S. 81–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. G. (1999): Transformational/Charismatic leadership’s tranformation of the field: an historical essay. In: Leadership Quarterly 10 (2), S. 129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilies, R./Nahrgang, J. D./Morgeson, F. P. (2007): Leader-Member Exchange and Citizenship Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. In: Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (1), S. 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaschube, J. (2006): Eigenverantwortung: eine neue berufliche Leistung. Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2011): Arbeits-, Organisations- und Personalpsychologie. Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayworth, T./Leidner, D. (2003): Organizational culture as a knowledge resource. In: Holsapple, C. W. (Hrsg.): Handbook on knowledge management: 1 knowledge matters. Berlin, S. 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, S. P./Peón, J. M. M./Ordás, C. J. V. (2004): Managing knowledge: The link between culture and organizational learning. In: Journal of Knowledge Management 8 (6), S. 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F./Avolio, B. J. (2003): Authentic Leadership Development. In: Cameron, K. S./Dutton, J. E./Quinn, R. E. (Hrsg.): Positive Organizational Scholarship. San Francisco, S. 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J./Frost, P. J. (1996): The organizational culture war games: A struggle for intellectual dominance. In: Clegg, S./Hardy, C./Nord, W. (Hrsg.): Handbook of organization studies. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzler, K./Müller, J. (2011): Antecedents of knowledge sharing – Examining the influence of learning orientation and performance orientation on knowledge sharing. In: Journal of Economic Psychology 32 (3), S. 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzler, K./Renzl, B./Mooradian, T./von Krogh, G./Müller, J. (2011): Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing. In: International Journal of Human Resource Management 2 (2), S. 296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzler, K./Renzl, B./Müller, J./Herting, S./Mooradian, T. (2008): Personality Traits and Knowledge Sharing. In: Journal of Economic Psychology 29, S. 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzler, K./Renzl, B./Pechlaner, H. (2003): Werte mit und für die Mitarbeiter schaffen. In: Matzler, K./Pechlaner, H./Renzl, B. (Hrsg.): Werte schaffen – Perspektiven einer stakeholderorientierten Unternehmensführung. Wiesbaden, S. 305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2002): Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, M./Weller, I. (2012): Kontaktstudium: Hat Wissensmanagement eine Zukunft? Stand der Dinge und Ausblick. In: ZFBF-Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift fur Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 64, S. 114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooradian, T. A./Renzl, B./Matzler, K. (2006): Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. In: Management Learning 37 (4), S. 523–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (2012a): The interactive relationship of corporate culture and knowledge management: a review. In: Review of Managerial Science 6 (2), S. 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (2012b): Knowledge sharing between project teams and its cultural antecedents. In: Journal of Knowledge Management 16 (3), S. 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J./Abfalter, D./Hautz, J./Hutter, K./Matzler, K./Raich, M. (2011): Corporate environmentalism: A comparative analysis of country and industry differences in leading US and German companies. In: European Journal of International Management. 5 (2), S. 122–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. (2009): Projektteamübergreifender Wissensaustausch – Fehlervermeidung und organisationales Lernen durch interaktive Elemente einer Wissenskultur. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J./Renzl, B./Hinterhuber, H. H./Lakomski, G. (2007): Leadership im Wissenszeitalter. In: Raich, M./Pechlaner, H./Hinterhuber, H. H. (Hrsg.): Entrepreneurial Leadership: Profilierung in Theorie und Praxis. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2002): Führen und führen lassen. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I./Konno, N. (1998): The concept of "Ba": Building a foundation for knowledge creation. In: California Management Review 40 (3), S. 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I./Takeuchi, H. (1995): The knowledge-creating company – How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, K. (2005): Wissensorientierte Unternehmensführung: Wertschöpfung durch Wissen. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (2010): Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A. I./Chatman, J. A./Caldwell, D. F. (1991): People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. In: Academy of Management Journal 34 (3), S. 487–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, S./Kandadi, K. R. (2006): How to develop knowledge culture in organizations? A multiple case study of large distributed organizations. In: Journal of Knowledge Management 10 (4), S. 6–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L./Conger, J. A. (2003): Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L./Sims, H. P. (2002): Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. In: Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 (2), S. 172–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J./Waterman, R. H. (1982): In search of excellence. Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966): The tacit dimension. London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis, J. D. (2001): The relationship of various leadership styles to knowledge management. In: Leadership & Organization Development Journal 22 (8), S. 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politis, J. D. (2002): Transformational and transactional leadership enabling (disabling) knowledge acquisition of self-managed teams: the consequences for performance. In: Leadership & Organization Development Journal 23 (4), S. 186–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raich, M./Abfalter, D./Mueller, J. (forthcoming): Hybrid analysis of textual data: Grounding managerial decisions on intertwined qualitative and quantitative analysis. In: Management Decision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichwald, R./Möslein, K. (2005): Führung und Führungssysteme. In: (Hrsg.): HHL. Leipzig Graduate School of Management,

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzl, B. (2008): Trust in management and knowledge sharing – the mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. In: Omega - International Journal of Management Science 36 (2), S. 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstiel, L. v./Kaschube, J. (2013): Führung. In: Schuler, H. (Hrsg.): Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie. Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985): How culture forms, develops, and changes. In: Kilmann, R. H./Saxton, M. J./Serpa, R. (Hrsg.): Gaining control of the corporate culture. San Francisco, S. 17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. A./Castro, S. L./Cogliser, C. C. (1999): Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. In: Leadership Quarterly 10 (1), S. 63–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, U. (2003): On knowledge work. In: Holsapple, C. W. (Hrsg.): Handbook on knowledge management: 1 knowledge matters. Berlin, S. 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B./House, R. J./Arthur, M. B. (1993): The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-concept Based Theory. In: Organization Science 4 (4), S. 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L. (1983): Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (3), S. 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C. (1996): Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. In: Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), S. 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A./Bartol, K. M./Locke, E. A. (2006): Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. In: Academy of Management Journal 49 (6), S. 1239–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H. (1992): Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. In: Journal of Management Studies 29 (6), S. 713–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab, A. G./Taylor, M. S. (2003): Aren’t there two parties in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences of organization-employee agreement on contract obligations and violations. In: Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (5), S. 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2001): Do we really understand "tacit knowledge"? In: Easterby-Smith, M./Lyles, M. A. (Hrsg.): Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford, S. 410–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2006): Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. In: Leadership Quarterly 17 (6), S. 654–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • uit Beijerse, R. P. (1999): Questions in knowledge management: Defining and conceptualising a phenomenon. In: Journal of Knowledge Management 3 (2), S. 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D./Sitkin, S. B. (2013): A Critical Assessment of Charismatic— Transformational Leadership Research: Back to the Drawing Board? In: The Academy of Management Annals 7 (1), S. 1–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G./Nonaka, I./Rechsteiner, L. (2012): Leadership in Organizational Knowledge Creation: A Review and Framework. In: Journal of Management Studies 49 (1), S. 240–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947): The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2006): Leadership in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelger, J. (1999): Wissensorganisation durch sprachliche Gestaltbildung im qualitativen Verfahren. In: Zelger, J./Mair, M. (Hrsg.): GABEK. Verarbeitung und Darstellung von Wissen. Innsbruck/Wien, S. 41–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelger, J. (2002): Handbuch zum Verfahren GABEK® - WinRelan®5.2. Band I, Von der Problemstellung zum Zwischenbericht, Unpublished Manuskrict, Innsbruck, Institut für Philisophie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelger, J./Oberprantacher, A. (2002): Processing of verbal data and knowledge representation by GABEK®-WinRelan® In: Forum Qualitative Research 3 (2).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Deutschland

    Jun.-Prof. Dr. Julia Müller

  2. Privatuniversität Schloss Seeburg, Seekirchen am Wallersee, Österreich

    Prof. Dr. Birgit Renzl

Authors
  1. Jun.-Prof. Dr. Julia Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Birgit Renzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Müller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für strategische Management, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Kurt Matzler

  2. Katholische Uni. Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Harald Pechlaner

  3. Professur f. Strategie u. Organisation, Privatuniversität Schloss Seeburg, Seekirchen am Wallersee/Salzburg, Austria

    Birgit Renzl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Müller, J., Renzl, B. (2014). Leadership im Wissenszeitalter – eine empirische Follow-up Studie. In: Matzler, K., Pechlaner, H., Renzl, B. (eds) Strategie und Leadership. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04057-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04057-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04056-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04057-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation