Abstract
In the last chapter we saw how scenario-based planning can improve decision processes. We will now turn our attention to decisions at an aggregated or corporate level. We will examine how entire strategies can change and – ideally – be optimized. The key question is how scenario-based planning can help make strategies more flexible. This chapter therefore begins by explaining what exactly is meant by "flexible strategies" and where they belong in the conceptual scheme of things. We will look at factors that impair the flexibility of a company's strategies and suggest ways to overcome these hindrances. Examples drawn from various industries illustrate why and in what areas today's businesses depend more heavily than ever on flexible strategies.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Bernau V. 2012. Dienstleister statt Verleger. Springer macht sein Geld im Netz. Süddeutsche Zeitung 08.03.2012, 21.
Burmann C. 2004a. Strategische Flexibilität und Strategiewechsel als Determinanten des Unternehmenswertes. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Burmann C. 2004b. Strategische Flexibilität und der Marktwert von Unternehmen. In Erfolgsfaktor Flexibilität. Kaluza B., Becker T. (eds.). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag: 29–53.
Collins DJ., Montgomery CA. 1994. Competing on Resources. Harvard Business Review 73(7/8): 118–128.
Dambeck H. 2011. Wind im Tank. Spiegel Online. http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/technik/0,1518,793840,00.html. Accessed 13 March 2012.
Doz Y., Kosonen M. 2008. Fast Strategy– How strategic agility will help you to stay ahead of the game. Strategy Magazine 15(3), 6–10.
Garud R., Nayyar PR. 1994. Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal 15(5): 365–385.
Gilbert CG. 2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia. Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal 48(5): 741–763.
Hamel G., Välikangas L. 2003. The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review 81(9): 52–65.
Hannan MT., Freeman J. 1984: Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49(2): 149–164.
Jacob H. 1989. Flexibilität und ihre Bedeutung für die Betriebspolitik. In Integration und Flexibilität. Adam D., Backhaus K., Meffert H., Wagner H. (eds.). Wiesbaden: Gabler: 15–60.
Katsuhiko S., Hitt MA. 2004. Strategic flexibility: Organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions. Academy of Management Executive 18(4): 44–59.
Khanna T., Song J., Kyungmook L. 2011: The paradox of Samsung’s rise. Harvard Business Review 89(7): 142–147.
Kaluza B. 1993. Flexibilität, betriebliche. In Handwörterbuch der Betriebswirtschaft. Wittmann W. et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel: 1174–1183.
Lengnick-Hall CA., Beck TE. 2009. Resilience Capacity and Strategic Agility: Prerequisites for Thriving in a Dynamic Environment. The University of Texas at San Antonio, College of Business Working Paper Series. http://business.utsa.edu/wps/mgt/0059MGT-199-2009.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2012.
Meffert H. 1985. Größere Flexibilität als Unternehmenskonzept. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung. 37(2): 121–137.
Miller D., Friesen PH. 1980. Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal 23(4), 591–614.
Penrose E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, A. (Ed.). 2011b. Intelligence on wheels. think:act Business COO Insights. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants. 2/2011: 21–23.
Schmidt, A. (Ed.). 2011b. Can print survive the Internet? think:act Business COO Insights. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants. 2/2011: 24–27.
Schreyögg G., Sydow J., Koch J. 2003: Organisatorische Pfade – Von der Pfadabhängigkeit zur Pfadkreation. In Strategische Prozesse und Pfade. Schreyögg J., Sydow J. (eds.). Wiesbaden: Gabler: 258–294.
Sydow J., Schreyögg G., Koch J. 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review 34(4): 689–709.
The Economist. 2012. Technological change: The last Kodak moment? The Economist 402(8767): 63–64.
Teece DJ., Pisano G., Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509–533.
Tushman ML., Romanelli E. 1985. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7). Cummings, LL, Staw BM eds.(.) Greenwich: JAI Press: 171–122.
Volberda HW. 1997. Building flexible organizations for fast-moving markets. Long Range Planning 30(2): 169 -183.
Volberda HW., Baden-Fuller C. 1998. Strategic Renewal and competence building. Four dynamic mechanisms. In Strategic Flexibility: Managing in a Turbulent Economy. Hamel G., Prahalad CK, Thomas H., O’Neal V. (eds.) Chichester: Wiley: 371–389.
Wendt T. 2011. Automotive landscape 2025. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants study. http://www.rolandberger.com/media/press/releases/511-press_archive2011_sc_content/Automotive-landscape-2025.html. Accessed 13 March 2012.’
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geissler, C., Krys, C. (2013). The benefits of scenario-based planning. In: Schwenker, B., Wulf, T. (eds) Scenario-based Strategic Planning. Roland Berger School of Strategy and Economics. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02875-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02875-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02874-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02875-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)