Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

EU und Europäisierung aus komparativer politikwissenschaftlicher Perspektive

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften ((SNW))

Zusammenfassung

Das Feld der Europäisierungsforschung beschäftigt sich mit Veränderungen unterschiedlicher Aspekte nationaler Politik, welche ursächlich auf die Europäische Union bzw. den europäischen Integrationsprozess zurückgehen. Konkret wird analysiert wie sich politische Inhalte, institutionelle Arrangements oder auch die politische Auseinandersetzung durch den Einfluss der EU verändern. Zusätzlich wird untersucht, durch welche Mechanismen dieser Einfluss transportiert wird und unter welchen Bedingungen dieser zu starken bzw. schwachen Veränderungen auf nationaler Ebene führt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Zusätzlich lässt sich zunehmend auch ein Interesse an Fragen erkennen, die auf die Bestimmung adverbialer Lokalbestimmungen abzielen. Diese Studien analysieren, wo der Integrationsprozess nationale Politik beeinflusst: Wie unterscheidet sich der Einfluss zwischen alten und neuen Mitgliedstaaten? Wie ist dieser Einfluss in auch jenseits der aktuellen geographischen Grenzen der Europäischen Union beschaffen? Dieser Beitrag klammert dieses Feld aufgrund von Platzbeschränkungen jedoch aus. Siehe jedoch: (Schimmelfennig 2012; Sedelmeier 2011).

  2. 2.

    Zur genaueren Diskussion der Literatur mit diesem Fokus siehe: (Goetz und Meier-Sahling 2008).

  3. 3.

    Ähnlich auch Judge (1995).

  4. 4.

    Einen sehr viel detaillierten Überblick über die Entwicklungen in diesem Teilbereich der Europäisierungsforschung als uns an dieser Stelle möglich ist, liefert Ladrech (2009).

  5. 5.

    In den Bereichen Regionalpolitik und Beihilfepolitik ist dieser Fokus jedoch interessanterweise vor allem hinsichtlich der alten westeuropäischen Mitgliedstaaten relevant, während die neuen osteuropäischen Staaten recht gut beleuchtet sind (Bache 2010; Blauberger 2009a, 2009b; Bruszt 2008; Hughes und Sasse 2004).

Literatur

  • Bache, Ian. 2010. Europeanization and multi-level governance: EU cohesion policy and pre- accession aid in Southeast Europe. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 10(1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Colin J. 1991. Review Article: What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21:215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blauberger, Michael. 2009a. Compliance with rules of negative integration: European state aid control in the new member states. Journal of European Public Policy 16(7): 1030–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blauberger, Michael. 2009b. Staatliche Beihilfen in Europa. Die Integration der Beihilfekontrolle in der EU und die Europäisierung der Beihilfepolitik in den neuen Mitgliedstaaten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, Tanja. 2000. Why there is no southern problem. On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 7(1): 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, Tanja A., Tobias Hofmann, Diana Panke, und Carina Sprungk. 2010. Obstinate and inefficient: Why member states do not comply with European law. Comparative Political Studies 43(11): 1363–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, Tanja A., Tobias Hofman, und Diana Panke. 2011. Caving in or sitting it out? Longitudinal patterns of non-compliance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 18(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruszt, László. 2008. Multi-level governance – The Eastern versions: Emerging patterns of regional development governance in the new member states. Regional and Federal Studies 18(5): 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, Deidre, und Morten Egeberg, Hrsg. 2008. Towards a new executive order in Europe? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, Catherine E. 2007. Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale?: How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics 8(3): 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul. J., und Powell, Walter W. 1991. The iron cage revisited. Institutionalized isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Hrsg. Walter W. Powell und Paul J. DiMaggio. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duina, Francesco G. 1997. Explaining legal implementation in the European Union. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 25(2): 155–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Kenneth. 2002. Introduction: EMU as integration, Europeanization, and convergence. In European states and the Euro: Europeanization, variation, and convergence, Hrsg. Kenneth Dyson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, Morten. 2006. Multilevel union administration. The transformation of executive politics in Europe. Houndsmills: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, Gerda, Oliver Treib, Miriam Hartlapp, und Simone Leiber. 2005. Complying with Europe. EU Harmonisation and soft law in the member states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, Gerda, Miriam Hartlapp, und Oliver Treib. 2007. Worlds of compliance: Why leading approaches to European Union implementation are only ‚sometimes-true theories‘. European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchino, Fabio. 2005. The study of EU public policy. European Union Politics 6(2): 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, Klaus H., und Simon Hix, Hrsg. 2000. Europeanised politics? European integration and national political systems. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, Klaus H., und Jan-Hinrik Meier-Sahling. 2008. The Europeanisation of national political systems: Parliaments and executives. Living Reviews on European Governance 3(2): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverland, Markus. 2000. National adaptation to European integration: The importance of institutional veto points. Journal of Public Policy 20(1): 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellström, Johan. 2008. Partisan responses to Europe: The role of ideology for national parties’ positions on European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 15(2): 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, Adrienne, Dieter Kerwer, Christoph Knill, Dirk Lehmkuhl, und Anne-Cécile Douillet, Hrsg. 2001. Differential Europe: The European Union impact on national policymaking. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille, Peter, und Christoph Knill. 2006. ‚It’s the bureaucracy, stupid‘. The implementation of the acquis communautaire in EU candidate countries, 1999–2003. European Union Politics 7(4): 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, Simon. 1999. Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses. Journal of Political Research 35(1): 69–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzhacker, Ronald. 2005. The power of opposition parliamentary party groups in European scrutiny. Journal of Legislative Studies 11(3/4): 428–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, Katharina, und Christoph Knill. 2005. Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy 12(5): 775–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, Lisbeth, und Gary Marks. 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, James, und Gwendolyn Sasse. 2004. Conditionality and compliance in the EU’s east-ward enlargement: Regional policy and the reform of sub-national government. Journal of Common Market Studies 42(3): 523–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, David. 1995. The failure of national parliaments. West European Politics 18(3): 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeding, Michael. 2006. Determinants of transposition delay in the European Union. Journal of Public Policy 26(3): 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeding, Michael. 2008. Lost in translation or full steam ahead. European Union Politics 9(1): 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, Hussein. 2003. Meeting the demands of EU Membership: The Europeanization of national administrative systems. In The politics of Europeanization, Hrsg. Kevin Featherstone und Claudio M. Radaelli, 83–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, Daniele R. 2011. Eurolegalism – The transformation of law and regulation in the European Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony. 1994. Chief executives in Western Europe. In Developing democracy, Hrsg. Ian Budge und David McKay, 150–162. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, Christoph. 2001. The Europeanization of national administrations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, Christoph, und Dirk Lehmkuhl. 1999. How Europe matters. Different mechanisms of Europeanization. European Integration online Papers 3(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, Christoph, und Andrea Lenschow. 1998. Coping with Europe: The impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy 5(4): 595–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, und Edgar Grande. 2008. West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Külahci, Erol. 2012. Europeanisation and party politics: How the EU affects domestic actors, patterns and systems. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladrech, Robert. 2002. Europeanization and political parties: Towards a framework for analysis. Party Politic 8(4): 387–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladrech, Robert. 2007. National political parties and European governance: The consequences of ‚missing in action‘. West European Politics 30(5): 945–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladrech, Robert. 2009. Europeanization and political parties. Living Reviews on European Governance 4(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, Thomas. 1999. Governing the skies: conditions for the Europeanisation of airline policy. Journal of Public Policy 19(1): 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, Leon N, und Stuart Scheingold. 1970. Regional integration: Theory and research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Peter. 2000. The limited impact of Europe on national party systems. West European Politics 23(4): 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Peter. 2007a. Political opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition 42(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Peter. 2007b. Political parties and party systems, in Europeanization: New research agendas. In Europeanization: New research agendas, Hrsg. Paolo Graziano und Maarten P. Vink, 154–166. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Gary, und Carole J. Wilson. 2000. The past in the present: A cleavage theory of party response to European integration. British Journal of Political Science 30(3): 433–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastenbroek, Ellen. 2003. Surviving the deadline: The transposition of EU directives in the Netherlands. European Union Politics 4(4): 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbaye, Heather A. 2001. Why national states comply with supranational law: Explaining implementation infringements in the European Union, 1972–1993. European Union Politics 2(3): 259–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John. W., und Brian Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations. Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittag, Jürgen, und Wolfgang Wessels. 2003. The ‚One‘ and the ‚fifteen‘? The member states between procedural adaptation and structure revolution. In Fifteen into one? The European Union and its member states, Hrsg. Wolfgang Wessels, Andreas Maurer und Jürgen Mittag, 413–454. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1994. Why the European Community strengthens the state: Domestic politics and international cooperation. Center for European Studies Working Paper – Harvard University 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Johan P. 2003. Towards a European administrative space? Journal of European Public Policy 10(4): 506–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, Edward. 2003. Europeanisation and the persistence of administrative systems. In Governing Europe, Hrsg. Jack Hayward und Anand Menon, 162–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, Paul. 2006. An empirical analysis of the Europeanization of national party manifestos, 1960–2003. European Union Politics 7(2): 252–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Johannes, und Peter Slominski. 2003. Influencing EU Politics? The case of the Austrian parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 41(4): 707–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollit, Christopher, Karen Bathgate, Janice Caulfield, Amanda Smullen, und Colin Talbot. 2001. Agency fever? Analysis of an international policy fashion. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 3(3): 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, Claudio M. 2000. Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change. European Integration online Papers 4(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, Tapio. 2005. Holding governments accountable in European affairs: Explaining cross-national variation. Journal of Legislative Studies 11(34): 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, Tapio, und Simon Hix. 2000. Backbenchers learn to fight back: European integration and parliamentary government. West European Politics 23(4): 142–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas, Green Cowles, Maria, und James Caporaso. 2001. Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction. In Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, Hrsg. Maria Green Cowles, James Caporaso, und Thomas Risse. 1–20. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saalfeld, Thomas. 2005. Deliberate delegation or abdication? Government backbenchers, ministers and European Union legislation. Journal of Legislative Studies 11(3/4): 343–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 1994. Community and autonomy: Multi-level policy-making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 1(2): 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2012. Europeanization beyond Europe. Living Reviews on European Governance 7(1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank, und Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2004. Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 661–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien. 1997. European integration and democracy: The differences among member states. Journal of European Public Policy 4(1): 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A. 2002. Europeanization and the mechanics of economic policy adjustment. Journal of European Public Policy 9(6): 894–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2012. Is Europeanisation through conditionality sustainable?: Lock-in of institutional change after EU accession. West European Politics 35(1): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2011. Europeanisation in new member and candidate states. Living Reviews on European Governance 6(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siedentopf, Heinrich, und Benedikt Speer. 2003. The European administrative space from a German administrative science perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences 69(1): 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Paul G. 1983. The limits of European integration. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tews, Kerstin. 2002. Politiktransfer: Phänomen zwischen Policy-Lernen und Oktroi. Überlegungen zu unfreiwilligen Umweltpolitikimporten am Beispiel der EU-Osterweiterung. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht 2, 173–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toshkov, Dimiter. 2007. Transposition of EU social policy in the new member states. Journal of European Social Policy 17(4): 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treib, Oliver. 2003. Die Umsetzung von EU-Richtlinien im Zeichen der Parteipolitik: Eine akteurszentrierte Antwort auf die Misfit-These. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 44(4): 506–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treib, Oliver. 2008. Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs. Living Reviews in European Governance 3:1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1991. The transformation of Europe. The Yale Law Journal 100(8): 2403–2483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubek, Radoslaw. 2001. A core in check: The transformation of the Polish core executives. Journal of European Public Policy 8(6): 911–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubek, Radoslaw. 2005. Complying with transposition commitments in Poland: Collective dilemmas, core executive and legislative outcomes. West European Politics 28(3): 592–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Lehrstuhl für Empirische Theorien der Politik, Geschwister-Scholl-Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland

    Christian Adam

  2. Professor für Empirische Theorien der Politik, Geschwister-Scholl-Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Knill, Deutschland

    Christoph Knill

Authors
  1. Christian Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christoph Knill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Adam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Hans-Joachim Lauth

  2. Universität Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Niedersachsen, Germany

    Marianne Kneuer

  3. Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany

    Gert Pickel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adam, C., Knill, C. (2016). EU und Europäisierung aus komparativer politikwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. In: Lauth, HJ., Kneuer, M., Pickel, G. (eds) Handbuch Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften . Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02338-6_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02338-6_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02337-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02338-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation