Abstract
This chapter revises current knowledge on marine biotoxins that are known nowadays, considering all the distinct groups based on chemical structure and lipophilic or hydrophilic characteristics. Diarrheic shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTerm
DSP
), paralytic shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTermPSP
), amnesic shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTermASP
), azaspiracid shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTermAZP
), ciguatera fish poisoning (GlossaryTermCFP
) are some of the groups that will be reviewed in this chapter.The recent development and application of advanced technologies from the generically defined -omics sciences coupled with bioinformatics platforms has been included in this chapter in order to understand the ecology and evolution of phytoplankton species and bloom dynamics. Dinoflagellate toxins are structurally and functionally diverse, and many present unique biological activities.
The literature and information regarding the biological activities and the potential application of these phycotoxins has been gathered in this book section.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Molecularly Imprint Polymer
- Domoic Acid
- Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning
- Shellfish Poisoning
- Receptor Binding Assay
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Marine biotoxins are natural compounds mainly produced by marine microalgae, dinoflagellates, and diatoms. A small percentage of algae produce toxins that can harm human beings and also pose a deadly risk. Toxins are nonproteinaceous metabolites with different and complex structures, physical properties, and specific mechanisms of action. In general, they have low molecular weight ranging from to . Shellfish and fish may become contaminated with these phycotoxins due to accumulation through marine food webs. Risk to humans often results in gastrointestinal disease, loss of short-term memory, neurological disorders, paralytic effects, or even death. In addition, the threat of marine biotoxins is not only a major cause of concern on human health and food safety, but it is also detrimental to the explotation of marine resources around the world and the economy of shellfish producers and associated industries, including tourism. This chapter revises current knowledge on marine biotoxins that are known nowadays, considering all the distinct groups based on chemical structure and lipophilic or hydrophilic characteristics. Diarrheic shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTerm
DSP
), paralytic shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTermPSP
), amnesic shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTermASP
), azaspiracid shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTermAZP
), ciguatera fish poisoning (GlossaryTermCFP
) are some of the groups that will be reviewed in this chapter. Contamination by marine biotoxins often involves more than one group of toxins and monitoring programs typically cover a range of toxins. There has been an increased effort to develop rapid and feasible screening methods for marine biotoxins. Many methods to detect toxins and phytoplankton have several technical and, sometimes, ethical limitations and generally lack an adequate validation. Functional assays, rapid screening tests, generally based on immunological methods and molecular biology techniques, among others are attractive alternatives to toxins and microalgae characterization. In this chapter, different approaches to monitor and specific detection of shellfish toxins and dinoflagellates are reviewed taking into account the availability of resources. The potential use of several techniques for marine biotoxins or phytoplankton characterization, such as biosensors, applied immunology, GlossaryTermPCR
, sequencing, radioisotopic, flow cytometry, metabolomics, and proteomics will be explained along the chapter. Marine phytoplankton comprised both prokaryotic and eukaryotic species that share a common ability to photosynthesize and thus thrive in the upper, euphotic zone of the worlds’ oceans. Together, the prokaryotic and eukaryotic phytoplankton support marine food webs, including valuable fisheries and play a key role in the regulation of global biogeochemical cycles. Identification and quantification of individual species remains a difficult task. The recent development and application of advanced technologies from the generically defined -omics sciences coupled with bioinformatics platforms has been included in this chapter in order to understand the ecology and evolution of phytoplankton species and bloom dynamics. Dinoflagellate toxins are structurally and functionally diverse, and many present unique biological activities. At present, marine biotoxins include an extraordinary potential source of new bioactive compounds for pharmaceutical or medical uses constituting an emergent field of interest. Sometimes, the toxin itself is directly used as a drug, although more often the toxin lead compound provides a design idea for the development of a drug molecule. The biological activities of these phycotoxins are harmful to the target organisms, since the function of the toxin is either to protect the toxic species from attack by a predator or to immobilize the potential preys. Despite the damage in the target organism, toxins have a great potential for not target organisms, in particular for therapeutic purposes in humans. For instance, the target of many marine neurotoxins is the Na channel, though the sites of interaction and, thus, the pharmacological effects differ among compounds. In this context, phycotoxins can be invaluable tools to recognize and identify ionic channels and the specific role of each channel subtype in controlling cell function, exocytosis, or the Ca-dependent release of a given neurotransmitter. The literature and information regarding the biological activities and the potential application of these phycotoxins has been gathered in this book section.1 Marine Toxins
Marine biotoxins are produced by certain species of toxic phytoplankton and can accumulate in various marine species: fish, crustacean, or molluscs such as mussels, clams, oysters, and scallops. In shellfish, toxins mainly accumulate in the digestive glands without causing adverse effects on the shellfish itself. However, when contaminated shellfish is consumed by humans this may lead to a severe intoxication or even death, causing public health and economic problems.
Currently, five groups of marine toxins are regulated in Europe: amnesic shellfish poisoning toxins (GlossaryTerm
ASP
), paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins (GlossaryTermPSP
), okadaic acid (GlossaryTermOA
) and pectenotoxin group (GlossaryTermDSP
), azaspiracid group, and yessotoxin group (EC/853/2004) [1]. Another group, neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTermNSP
) toxins (e. g., brevetoxin) is regulated in United States, New Zealand, and Australia. Many cases of tetradotoxin food poisoning are reported in Southeastern Asia as well as ciguatera fish poisoning (GlossaryTermCFP
) that was limited to tropical and subtropical areas. Other emerging toxins (Palytoxin, cyclic imines,) are not on the radar of the European Legislation or in other regions of the world. Scientists and legislative authorities are aware of these toxins but do not have sufficient amount of information related to their activity, estimation of the toxicity and risk assessment in humans [2].2 Lipophilic Toxins
2.1 Okadaic Acid-Group (OA) Toxins and Pectenotoxin-Group Toxin (PTXs)
GlossaryTerm
OA
-group toxins are a class of marine biotoxins that include GlossaryTermOA
and dinophysis toxins (GlossaryTermDTX
1, GlossaryTermDTX
2, and GlossaryTermDTX
3). These toxins cause Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (GlossaryTermDSP
), which is characterized by symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. These toxins are produced by planktonic dinoflagellates, Dinophysis genus, and the benthic Prorocentrum genus and can be found mainly in shellfish.They were first reported in Netherlands in 1960s [3, 4] and in Japan in 1978 [5]. Nowadays, their distribution is considered worldwide, Europe, Japan, North and South America Australia, Indonesia, and New Zealand [6].
GlossaryTerm
OA
-group toxins are heat-stable polyether compounds [7]. While GlossaryTermOA
and GlossaryTermDTX
2 only differ by the position of one methyl group in the molecule, GlossaryTermDTX
1 has one additional methyl group. GlossaryTermDTX
3 represents a wide range of derivatives of GlossaryTermOA
, GlossaryTermDTX
1, and GlossaryTermDTX
2 that form acylated analogues when they are esterified with saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. Acylated analogs were reported to contribute considerably to the concentration of total GlossaryTermOA
-group toxins [7, 8].GlossaryTerm
OA
and GlossaryTermDTX
s act by inhibiting serine/threonine phosphoprotein phosphatases PP1 and PP2A.These enzymes perform the dephosphorylation of numerous proteins; this function is closely related to many essential metabolic processes in eukaryotic cells [10, 9].Pectenotoxins (GlossaryTerm
PTX
s) frequently co-occur with the GlossaryTermOA
-group. The presence of GlossaryTermPTX
s in shellfish was discovered due to high acute toxicity in mouse bioassay (GlossaryTermMBA
) after intraperitoneal (GlossaryTermi.p.
) injections of lipophilic extracts. Animal studies indicate that they are much less potent via the oral route and they do not induce diarrhea. GlossaryTermPTX
s have been detected in microalgae and/or bivalve mollusks in Australia, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, and Spain and they are produced by Dinophysis spp.GlossaryTerm
PTX
s are cyclic polyether macrolides that include over analogs. GlossaryTermPTX
1 to GlossaryTermPTX
were originally isolated from Japanese scallops, Patinopecten yessoensis [11]. More recently, other GlossaryTermPTX
s were found but only four analogs (GlossaryTermPTX
2, GlossaryTermPTX
12, GlossaryTermPTX
11, and GlossaryTermPTX
13) have been identified as actual biosynthetic products of the algae. Other GlossaryTermPTX
s seem to be either product of the shellfish metabolism or artifacts [12].2.2 Yessotoxin-Group Toxins (YTXs)
Yessotoxins (GlossaryTerm
YTX
s) are a group of structurally related polyether toxins produced by the dinoflagellates Protoceratium reticulatum, and Lingulodinium polyedrum, and Gonyaulax spinifera [13]. YTXs had traditionally been included within the GlossaryTermDSP
group but the GlossaryTermEU
has excluded the YTXs from the GlossaryTermDSP
group in 2004, and nowadays, YTXs are considered as a separate group in the current regulation [1].YTXs was first isolated in Japan, in 1986 [14] from the digestive gland of P. yessoensis, a scallop that gave its name to the toxin. More recently, YTXs have been reported worldwide, in Korea [15], Chile [16], and New Zealand [17]. In Europe, it has been described in mollusks in Norway, Italy, Spain, and Russia [13].
YTXs are disulfated polyethers, with a characteristic ladder-shape formed by adjacent ether rings of different sizes and a terminal acyclic unsaturated side chain consisting of nine carbons and two sulfate ethers [13, 14]. The presence of the sulfo-ether group makes these molecules the most polar of the lipophylic toxins. More than YTXs congeners have been reported but structures for most of them have not been determined and only have been isolated [13, 18].
There is discrepancy between the toxicity via oral administration and GlossaryTerm
i.p.
injection and the precise mechanism of action is not yet known [13]. Several studies have been carried out to clarify this, it seems clear that YTXs do not inhibit phosphatases PP1 and PP2A [19]. They modulate homeostasis in human lymphocytes [20] and produce a cytotoxic effect during in vitro experiments in various cellular models, F-actin decrease, alter cell adhesion and cause apoptotic events [6].2.3 Azaspiracid-Group Toxins (AZAs)
Azaspiracids (GlossaryTerm
AZA
s) are a group of marine biotoxins that accumulate in shellfish and represent an emerging human health risk [21]. They were originally isolated from blue mussels from Killary Harbour (Ireland) and produced an outbreak of shellfish poisoning in the Netherlands, in 1995. Afterward, seafood contamination by GlossaryTermAZA
s have been reported in different coastal localizations, including Europe, North and South America, Africa, and Japan [22, 23, 24, 25, 26].There have been several attempts to identify the GlossaryTerm
AZA
-producing organism(s). James etal [27] have detected the presence of GlossaryTermAZA
-1, 2, and 3 in extracts from the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Protoperidium crassipes. However, this organism is supposed to act as a vector and nowadays, Azadium spinosum is considered the organism that produces these compounds [28].GlossaryTerm
AZA
s are nitrogen-containing polyether toxins involving a unique spiral ring assembly containing a heterocyclic amine and an aliphatic carboxylic acid moiety [27, 29, 6]. They have been identified as GlossaryTermAZA
1 to GlossaryTermAZA
5 and numerous natural analogs and artifacts of methanolic solution (methyl ester analogs). GlossaryTermAZA
4 and GlossaryTermAZA
5 seem to be a biotransformation product of primary compounds into shellfish.GlossaryTerm
AZA
1 is highly potent and capable of producing an important degradation of the intestinal tract and finally the death of rodent. In vitro assays, GlossaryTermAZA
s elevate caspase activity, increase cellular concentrations of and GlossaryTermcAMP
, induce irreversible cytoskeletal rearrangements, deplete cellular GlossaryTermATP
, inhibit neuronal ion flux and bioelectrical activity, inhibit cell–cell adhesion and stimulate cholesterol biosynthesis [21, 25]. Human symptoms of intoxication include nausea, vomiting, and stomach cramps, but thus far, no deaths have been attributed to GlossaryTermAZA
s [25].3 Hydrophilic Toxins
3.1 Saxitoxin-Group Toxins (STXs)
Saxitoxin (GlossaryTerm
STX
s)-group toxins include various naturally occurring neurotoxic alkaloids that induce the so-called paralytic shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTermPSP
) in humans. GlossaryTermPSP
is characterized by symptoms varying from a slight tingling sensation or numbness around the lips to fatal respiratory paralysis [30]. The intake of toxins necessary to induce GlossaryTermPSP
symptoms varies greatly. This may be due to differences in susceptibility as well as a lack of precision in exposure assessments due to problems with sampling and analysis of contaminated shellfish at the time of intoxication.They have been detected in bivalve mollusks from various areas of the world. Several decades ago, few localizations appeared to be affected by GlossaryTerm
PSP
; but nowadays they are found worldwide [31, 32, 33].GlossaryTerm
STX
s are mainly produced by toxic dinoflagellates belonging to the genus Alexandrium: e. g., A. tamarensis, A. minutum (syn. A. excavata), A. catenella, A. fraterculus, A. fundyense, and A. cohorticula, Gymnodimium, Pyrodinium and they have also been identified in some cyanobacteria which may occur in fresh and brackish waters.Most of GlossaryTerm
STX
-group toxins are water-soluble and heat-stable nonproteinaceous compounds whose basic structure is composed of a 3,4-propinoperhydropurine tricyclic system. Up to different GlossaryTermSTX
analogs have been described and they can be divided into subgroups based on substituent side chain such as carbamate, sulfate, hydroxyl, hydroxybenzoate, or acetate and also decarbamoyl variants [6]. GlossaryTermSTX
, NeoSTX, GTX1, and dc-GlossaryTermSTX
seem to be the most toxic analogs. These neurotoxins produce a blockade of ion conductance through the voltage-gated channel (GlossaryTermVGSC
) in nerves and muscles fibers [30].3.2 Domoic Acid
Domoic acid (GlossaryTerm
DA
) is a potent neurotoxic amino acid that accumulates in high concentrations in shellfish, anchovies, and sardines that feed on the toxic phytoplankton. GlossaryTermDA
can affect marine animals, seabirds, and humans via consumption of this contaminated shellfish causing amnesic shellfish poisoning (GlossaryTermASP
). GlossaryTermDA
was first reported in Canada in 1987 when it caused various human deaths after consuming GlossaryTermDA
-contaminated mussels [34]. Effects on both gastrointestinal tract and nervous system were observed including vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and hemorrhagic gastritis; neurological symptoms are headache, dizziness, vision disturbances, disorientation, loss of short-term memory, motor weakness, seizures, profuse respiratory secretions, hiccoughs, unstable blood pressure, cardiac arrhythmia, and coma. Neurological symptoms may occur after a delay of a few hours or up to days [35]. GlossaryTermDA
especially harms the hippocampus and amygdaloid nucleus in the brain and damages the neurons by activating α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (GlossaryTermAMPA
) and kainate receptors, causing an influx of and cell degeneration [36, 37].GlossaryTerm
DA
is produced by the red alga Chondria armata and also from the diatoms Pseudo-nitzschia spp. and Nitzschia [38]. It is a water-soluble and heat-stable cyclic amino acid and it is structurally very similar to another known neurotoxin, the kainic acid [39]. Several isomers of GlossaryTermDA
(epi-domoic acid (GlossaryTermepi-DA
), (domoic acid C5-diastereomer) and isodomoic acids A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H (GlossaryTermiso-DA A–H
)) have been reported as well [7]. Iso-DA A, B, and C have not been detected in shellfish tissue. GlossaryTermDA
transforms into GlossaryTermepi-DA
through long-term storage [40] and degrades and transforms to GlossaryTermepi-DA
and iso-DAs through exposure to ultraviolet light [41, 42, 43]. In addition, the epimerization is also accelerated by heating [44].4 Other Toxins
4.1 Ciguatoxins-Group Toxins
Ciguatoxins (GlossaryTerm
CTX
s) are a class of marine biotoxins that cause GlossaryTermCFP
. GlossaryTermCTX
s occur in fish as a result of biotransformation of precursor gambiertoxins produced by the benthic dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus spp. They are mainly associated to tropical and subtropical areas, but recently GlossaryTermCTX
-group toxins were identified for the first time in fish in Europe [45]. Various congeners of GlossaryTermCTX
s have been identified according to differences in their molecular structure: Pacific (GlossaryTermP-CTX
), Caribbean (GlossaryTermC-CTX
), and Indian (GlossaryTermI-CTX
s) [46].Symptoms of the intoxication of ciguatera in humans include gastrointestinal and neurological effects [47]. Although, Gambierdiscus toxicus has been traditionally considered the main species responsible for GlossaryTerm
CTX
s production, nowadays it is known that Gambierdiscus spp. shows a high degree of complexity and it is composed of genetically and morphologically toxin producer species. Thus, distantly related groups co-occur across geography. Ten Gambierdiscus species were reported in the Atlantic and in the Pacific region [48, 49], and other new species were found in European Atlantic waters and in the Mediterranean Sea [50].The congeners of GlossaryTerm
CTX
s are lipophilic polyethers compounds consisting of – rings fused by ether linkages into a rigid ladder-like structure. GlossaryTermCTX
s are colorless, tasteless, odorless, and relative heat stable, devoid of heteroatoms other than oxygen and bear few conjugated bonds. Nowadays, over chemical congeners of GlossaryTermCTX
s have been identified whose toxicity can vary significantly: more than 100-fold among species of Gambierdiscus spp. compared with a to 9-fold within species variation due to changing growth conditions [49]. The chemical structures of more than GlossaryTermP-CTX
s analogs, main GlossaryTermCTX
in Pacific areas, have been identified, and structural modifications are seen in both termini of the toxin molecules, mostly by oxidation. Two GlossaryTermCTX
s from Caribbean sea (GlossaryTermC-CTX
s) were first isolated by Vernoux and Lewis in 1997 [51], and then were identified structurally. Other additional congeners were identified in 2002 [52]. More recently, four Indian Ocean GlossaryTermCTX
s (GlossaryTermI-CTX
s) have been reported [53], but their structural determination remains to be established.The GlossaryTerm
VGSC
() is the primary molecular target of GlossaryTermCTX
s, and their binding to the neurotoxin receptor site of causes the opening of the ion pore, activation of the channels, and entrance into the cells. Membrane depolarization and functional impairment of excitable cells are produced due to entry into the cell. Secondary responses observed in cells exposed to GlossaryTermCTX
s include into the cell by reverse action of / exchangers eventually leading to muscular contraction and neurotransmitter release. influx also affects the entrance of water into the cell, leading to cell swelling, blebbing, and cytotoxicity [45].4.2 Brevetoxins (BTX)
Brevetoxin-(GlossaryTerm
BTX
) group toxins are neurotoxic polyether biotoxins which can accumulate in shellfish and fish. They are primarily produced by a dinoflagellate Karenia brevis (formerly called Gymnodinium breve and Ptychodiscus brevis) first identified in the Gulf of Mexico in 1947 [54, 55, 56]. However, other algae species (Chattonella antiqua, Chattonella marina, Fibrocapsa japonica, Heterosigma akashiwo) have also been reported to produce GlossaryTermBTX
-like toxins [57]. GlossaryTermBTX
s have been described in several localizations such as North America, New Zealand, Australia, Japan and Scotland [57, 58, 59]. K. brevis or K. brevis-like species have also been reported from Japan, New Zealand, West-Atlantic, Spain, Portugal, and Greece [57]. Nevertheless, no intoxication outbreaks in humans or occurrence of GlossaryTermBTX
-group toxins in shellfish or fish have been reported in Europe [55].They are grouped into types A and B based on their molecular backbone structures. GlossaryTerm
BTX
-1 (or GlossaryTermPbTx
-1)13 (type A) and GlossaryTermBTX
-2 are considered to be the parent toxins from which other GlossaryTermBTX
-group toxins derive [60]. GlossaryTermBTX
A has a backbone of fused cyclic ether rings; GlossaryTermBTX
B (most abundant in K. brevis) has a backbone of fused cyclic ether rings [60, 61, 62]. It is important to highlight that GlossaryTermBTX
-group toxins are metabolized in shellfish and fish, yielding several metabolites of GlossaryTermBTX
-group toxins that finally affect to consumers [55, 63].Ion channels are the principal target of GlossaryTerm
BTX
s by binding to receptor site 5 of the GlossaryTermVGSC
in cell walls [60] leading to an uncontrolled influx into cells and depolarization of neuronal and muscle cell membranes. The response to GlossaryTermBTX
s in different cells, organs or in vivo models is dependent on various factors, such as the existence of different GlossaryTermVGSC
subtypes expressed.4.3 Tetrodotoxin (TTXs)
GlossaryTerm
TTX
(11-[H]-tetrodotoxin) is a neurotoxin that has been identified from taxonomically diverse marine organism. Its name derives from Tetraodontiformes, an order that includes pufferfish, ocean sunfish or mola, triggerfish, among others. However, GlossaryTermTTX
has been described in a diverse range of phylogenetically unrelated organism, such as newts, frogs, nematodes, starfish, crabs, mollusk, and others. It has also been suggested that GlossaryTermTTX
is produced by symbiotic bacteria. Actually, there has been a debate between source of production of GlossaryTermTTX
from animals or bacteria, and nowadays it has not been firmly established a conclusion. GlossaryTermTTX
may serve as an antipredator defense, offensive weapon, or for within- and between-species communication [64].Although GlossaryTerm
TTX
is associated to tropical waters, mainly South Asia and more specifically Japan, it has been also identified in Mexico and United States [65]. In Europe, GlossaryTermTTX
has been reported in migrant puffer fish in Greek waters [66] and in a gastropod Charonia lampas lampas in Portugal [67].GlossaryTerm
TTX
is a heat-stable and water-soluble heterocyclic guanidine with a highly unusual structure containing a single guanidinium moiety attached to a highly oxygenated carbon backbone that consists of a 2,4-dioxaadamantane structure with five hydroxyl groups [68].Tetrodotoxin binds to site of the fast GlossaryTerm
VGSC
[33]. Site is located at the extracellular pore opening of the ion channel. The binding of any molecules to this site temporarily disables the function of the channel. Saxitoxin, neosaxitoxin also bind the same site although GlossaryTermTTX
has different affinities for the variant channel isoforms that confer resistance to various species [69]. GlossaryTermTTX
causes paralysis of voluntary muscles (including the diaphragm and intercostal muscles, stopping breathing), and reduced blood pressure, predominantly by vasodilatation. Early symptoms of this effect might include among others weakness, tingling of the lips, and dizziness [70]. Gastrointestinal symptoms are often severe and include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Cardiac arrhythmias may precede complete respiratory failure and cardiovascular collapse.4.4 Palytoxin (PlTXs) and Analogs
Palytoxin (GlossaryTerm
PlTX
) is one of the most poisonous nonprotein substances known to date. GlossaryTermPlTX
was first isolated and purified from Palythoa toxica [71] and currently present a worldwide distribution [71, 72]. GlossaryTermPlTX
s have also been detected in other marine zoanthids (soft corals) of the genus Palythoa (e. g., P. tuberculosa, P. vestitus, P. mammilosa, P. carobaeorum, P. aff. Margaritae) and benthic dinoflagellates of the genus Ostreopsis (e. g., Ostreopsis siamensis, O. mascarenensis, O. ovata) [73]. Blooms of Ostreopsis spp. have also been reported in European countries such as Spain, France, Italy, and Greece [74].The GlossaryTerm
PlTX
-group toxins are complex polyhydroxylated compounds with both lipophilic and hydrophilic areas. They are white, amorphous, hygroscopic solids. At least eight different GlossaryTermPlTX
analogs are known: GlossaryTermPlTX
, ostreocin-D, ovatoxin-A, homopalytoxin, bishomopalytoxin, neopalytoxin, deoxypalytoxin, and 42-hydroxypalytoxin [75].The main accepted molecular action of palytoxin is blockage of the /-ATPase pump [76, 77, 78]. This binding inhibits the active transport of and across the cell membrane that is essential for cell homeostasis, by transforming the pump into a nonspecific permanently open ion channel [79]. Symptoms of GlossaryTerm
PlTX
-group toxins intoxication are not well defined, but include weakness and myalgia, fever, nausea, and vomiting.4.5 Cyclic Imines (CIs)
Cyclic imines (GlossaryTerm
CI
s) are a recently discovered group of marine biotoxins formed by: spirolides (GlossaryTermSPX
s), gymnodimines (GlossaryTermGYM
s), pinnatoxins (GlossaryTermPnTX
s), pteriatoxins (GlossaryTermPtTX
s), prorocentrolides, and spiroprorocentrimine. These toxins are macrocyclic compounds with imine- (carbon–nitrogen double bond) and spiro-linked ether moieties. They are grouped together due to that imino group acts as functioning pharmacophore [80] and the similarities in their GlossaryTermi.p.
, toxicity in mice [6, 81].GlossaryTerm
SPX
s are the largest group of cyclic imines and together with GlossaryTermGYM
s are the best characterized. GlossaryTermSPX
s were described for the first time in contaminated shellfish, in 1991, in Canada [82]. These toxins are metabolites of dinoflagellates Alexandrium ostenfeldii and Alexandrium peruvianum and are sometimes found in the presence of other toxins such as GlossaryTermPSP
toxins [83]. Up to GlossaryTermSPX
s analogs have been described of which 13-desmethyl GlossaryTermSPX
C is the most commonly found in shellfish [81].GlossaryTerm
GYM
s are produced by the dinoflagellates Karenia selliformes and first isolated in oysters from New Zealand [84]. GlossaryTermPnTX
s and GlossaryTermPtTX
s are the GlossaryTermCI
structurally and synthetically more related to GlossaryTermSPX
s. GlossaryTermPTX
s were first discovered in extracts from the digestive glands of pen shell, Pinna attenuata in China and Japan [85]. Seven GlossaryTermPnTX
s analogs (GlossaryTermPnTX
s A-G) have been characterized [81]. Pteriatoxins A, B, and C, were isolated from the Okinawan bivalve Pteria penguin in 2001 [86]. Torigoe etal [87] isolated the Prorocentrolide A for the first time from Prorocentrum lima and then the Prorocentrolide B was first isolated from P. maculosum in 1996 [88]. Finally, Spiro-prorocentrimine was isolated from a laboratory-cultured benthic Prorocentrum species of Taiwan by Lu etal [89]. At present, it is accepted that nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are their principal target.4.6 Maitotoxins (MTXs) and Gambierol
Maitotoxins (GlossaryTerm
MTX
s) and gambierol are a group of water-soluble toxins produced by species of dinoflagellates of the genus Gambierdiscus, which grow on algae in tropical waters around the world. Gambierdiscus is known to produce both GlossaryTermMTX
and GlossaryTermCTX
s, which accumulate in the body of herbivorous fish and are transmitted through the tropical food chain to carnivorous species.GlossaryTerm
MTX
is a polyketide-derived polycyclic ether integrated by four rigid polyether ladders connected by mobile hydrocarbon chains. Maitotoxin includes ether rings, methyls, hydroxyls, and sulfuric acid esters and has an amphipathic structure [90, 91, 92].Maitotoxin activates permeable, nonselective cation channels, leading to an increase in levels of cytosolic ions. It is thought that maitotoxin leads to the formation of pores on these ion channels. Finally, a cell death cascade is activated, resulting in membrane blebbing and ultimately cell lysis [93]. Maitotoxin is known to activate cytosolic -activated proteases calpain-1 and calpain-2, contributing to necrosis [94].
Gambierol was described as a potent potassium voltage-gated channel blocker that exhibits potent acute lethal toxicity against mice (minimal lethal dose: , GlossaryTerm
i.p.
) and it is suspected to participate in the symptoms of GlossaryTermCFP
.5 Biotechnological Techniques Used to Study Toxic Microalgae and Marine Biotoxins
The potential use of several techniques for marine biotoxins or phytoplankton characterization are explained along the chapter. In general, the sensitivity of the analytical methods and bioassays depends on the toxins studied. Combination of several approaches, including chromatography-based techniques, to identify individual toxins and the overall toxicity of the mixture, should provide an ideal alternative. Thus, a synergistic complement can be obtained by coupling biological and or functional assays with analytical techniques based on the physicochemical properties of the toxins.
5.1 Immunological Methods
The main advantage of the immunological techniques is the variety of immunoglobulins for the specific detection of different targets. These are characterized by sensitivity, specificity, fast performing, and automation. However, the corner stone for these methods seems to be the quality of the antibody presenting cross-reactivity limitations.
An unequivocal identification of phytoplancton and detection of phycotoxins can be obtained by using a species-specific antibody against the target organism or group of toxins. Specific polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies can be reactive to one epitope and therefore more specific. Combination of some of them, allows the identification, counting, and examination of marine phytoplankton. Use of antibodies with fluorescent markers has made possible to apply different technologies, such as microscopy, flow cytometry, or flow cam. The light emitted by a labeled antibody can be detected by a fluorescent microscope, equipped with a GlossaryTerm
UV
light, a flow cytometer a confocal microscope or a flow cam. For instance, several monoclonal antibodies were obtained against different species of Alexandrium allowing the unequivocal identification of the dinoflagellate A. minutum [95]. Then, using immunofluorescence could help to identify different species in natural samples during coastal monitoring.To discriminate and count small cells or a large number of samples, flow cytometry can be used. Designed to automate the rapid analysis and identification of cells, flow cytometry is a reliable method for the routine monitoring of the abundance of phytoplankton species, leading to an early detection of GlossaryTerm
HAB
s. This is an optimal instrument for analyzing cells ranging from to in diameter (concentrations between to cells/L [96].In this context, a modified flow cytometer, known as FlowCam, was developed to handle larger cells. It is an integrated system combining the capabilities of flow cytometry, microscopy, imaging, and fluorescence that counts, takes images and analyses the particles that range in size from to . In addition, to monitor harmful species of microalgae, other potential applications of immunodetection include studies of plankton community structure and ocean optics. Other authors used Imaging FlowCytobot that combines video and flow cytometric technology to capture images of nano- and microplankton and to measure the chlorophyll fluorescence associated with each image. The images are of sufficient resolution to identify many organisms to genus or even species level [97].
The use of immunological assays has become a promising alternative for detecting small molecules such as marine biotoxins and many kits are commercially available.
5.1.1 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs)
The enzyme-labeled immunosorbent assay GlossaryTerm
ELISA
is a powerful analytical tool for natural toxins detection. Specific antibodies recognize toxins and this bound complex is quantified by labeling the free component with a reporter enzyme, usually horseradish peroxidase (GlossaryTermHRP
) acting as an amplifier to produce many signals. The use of the 96-well microtitre polystyrene plate, the automation and the competitive principle are the most commercial immunoassays for natural toxins.The GlossaryTerm
ASP
GlossaryTermELISA
for the determination of GlossaryTermDA
was approved by the GlossaryTermEU
as an alternative to the official chemical method GlossaryTermHPLC
-GlossaryTermUV
detection [98]. This kit is a direct competitive immunoassay where free GlossaryTermDA
in the sample competes with GlossaryTermDA
-conjugated protein coated on plastic wells for binding to antidomoic acid antibodies in the solution. Other GlossaryTermELISA
tests were developed as the Ridascreen Fast GlossaryTermPSP
, a competitive GlossaryTermELISA
for the quantitative analysis of GlossaryTermSTX
and related toxins. A monoclonal antibody with high affinity against brevetoxin B was used to develop a competitive GlossaryTermELISA
for detection of brevetoxins in molluscs [99]. Production of monoclonal antibodies for immunoassays by immunizing mice with a synthetic hapten conjugate, instead of the natural toxins, allowed the detection of Pacific ciguatoxins using a direct sandwich GlossaryTermELISA
[100, 101]. Recently, an improvement of the efficiency and simplification of a colorimetric competitive indirect immunoassay GlossaryTermELISA
was carried out based on direct labeling via a covalent bond to the anti-GlossaryTermOA
antibody [102, 103] and a chemiluminiscent GlossaryTermELISA
method for this toxin was also developed [104].The challenge of designing antibodies with the optimal specificity and matching toxicity with toxic levels is further complicated by the structural and toxicological diversity within a toxin group together with a potential chemical conversion and biotransformation. However, since recombinant antibodies have been successfully constructed against GlossaryTerm
PlTX
[105], similar strategies could help the challenge for complex toxins groups. Lack of standardization and transferability of in house GlossaryTermELISA
tests between laboratories should be overcome by increasing the focus on validation, based on new strategies for production of high-quality antibodies. Nevertheless, a comparative evaluation of GlossaryTermELISA
s and GlossaryTermEU
reference methods for the detection of the hydrophilic toxins GlossaryTermASP
and GlossaryTermPSP
was carried out in many seafood products [106]. The high correlation coefficient between official and immunoassays proves that these tests can be used as screening systems in a variety of species without matrix interference. However, the best sensitive bioassay will depend on the toxins evaluated. In this context, the advantages and disadvantages of GlossaryTermELISA
and cytotoxicity assays to detect GlossaryTermBTX
s were recently reviewed [107].5.1.2 Phage Display Technology
The phage display technology refers to the expression of peptides, proteins, or antibodies on the surface of filamentous bacteriophage viruses. This in vitro strategy provides a valuable system for easy and rapid generation of specific antibodies fragments directed against different antigens, including difficult targets as small molecules. Semisynthetic phage display libraries were used to select recombinant antibodies against GlossaryTerm
PlTX
. Some antibodies proved high affinity for immobilized and free GlossaryTermPlTX
in a competitive GlossaryTermELISA
with a low detection limit, a very reproducible standard curve and a wide working range [105].5.1.3 Biosensors
Biosensors are measuring systems based on a biological recognition component with three functioning parts: a biological element, cells, microorganisms, antibodies, the transducer, capable of measuring a biomolecular interaction and converting it into a signal, and the electronics, responsible for the display of the results easily interpreted.
Most of the biosensors developed for shellfish toxins are immunosensors and the optical biosensor with surface plasmon resonance (GlossaryTerm
SPR
) is the most widely used in the large majority of reported platforms [108]. It has been incorporated into a wide range of devices to measure the analytes present in a sample. For most biomolecules, the change in response is proportional to the mass of the material bound to the surface of the sensor chip. The measure of the binding response against time is called sensorgram [109]. Small molecular weight compounds, as many drugs and toxins, are very difficult to measure. Then, an inhibition assay approach that relies upon the immobilization of analytes to the chip surface and the injection of the binding partner over the chip surface was developed. Using this assay format, the level of binding to the surface is inversely proportional to the concentration of the target analyte present in the sample. There are three key elements that determine the way in which the methods perform.-
The binding protein, often an antibody, is essential in terms of delivering a specific molecular interaction with the target analyte.
-
The surface chemistry is a very important parameter in an GlossaryTerm
SPR
assay. Small compounds can be immobilized via the production of an analyte–protein conjugate and this, in turn, is immobilized onto the surface on a sensor chip via an amine or carboxyl coupling strategy. While this approach can be relatively straightforward, it has two main disadvantages. Firstly, during the regeneration of the chip surface, the immobilized conjugate can alter its three-dimensional structure and, thereby, bring about a different level of interaction with antibodies during subsequent interaction measurements. Secondly, the lifespan of an immobilized conjugate on a chip surface tends to be very short. The sensor chips tend to be the most expensive part of the assay, resulting in a high costper test. A much better way to produce chip surfaces is through the direct immobilization of the analyte onto the sensor surface, being much more robust and stable than the conjugate approach. -
The type of method used for sample preparation has to be compatible with this analytical approach. In general, due to the advantages of GlossaryTerm
SPR
over conventional immunoassays, i. e., as they are nonequilibrium based and flow through based, in many cases the requirement for a highly purified sample extract can be avoided [96].
Some examples of biosensors for GlossaryTerm
DA
, GlossaryTermOA
, GlossaryTermPSP
, or GlossaryTermTTX
have been developed, tested and/or validated [110, 111, 112, 113, 96]. However, one challenge for these assays is the ability to simultaneously measure multiple biotoxins in a single bioanalytical system as was performed in a Framework Project entitled CONFFIDENCE (www.conffidence.eu). Within this project, the GlossaryTermSPR
methods developed for GlossaryTermDSP
, GlossaryTermASP
, and GlossaryTermPSP
are being combined onto a single sensor chip using a multichannel biosensor developed as part of another European project Biocop (www.biocop.org).Comparison of GlossaryTerm
ELISA
and GlossaryTermSPR
biosensor technology for detection of GlossaryTermPSP
toxins shows that the method of choice will depend on the end-user needs. Some authors point out the reduced manual labor and simplicitiy of GlossaryTermSPR
biosensor compared to GlossaryTermELISA
, ease of sample extraction, and superior real time semiquantitave analysis [114], although lower costs and high sensitivity are some advantages of the GlossaryTermELISA
.GlossaryTerm
DNA
-biosensors have specific probes that target only GlossaryTermDNA
-sequences present in the organism of interest and can be used on-site and therefore circumvent the need to return samples into the laboratory. A GlossaryTermDNA
-biosensor was adapted by Metfies et al. to the electrochemical detection of the toxic dinoflagellate A. ostenfeldii [115]. The technical background of this device is explained in detail in the German patent application DE 10032 042 A1 (Elektrochemischer Einwegbiosensor für die quantitative Bestimmung von Analytkonzentrationen in Flüssigkeiten). The device could facilitate the work that must be undertaken in the course of monitoring toxic algae by eliminating the need to count algae and reduce the toxins tests.An immunosensor based on magnetic beads as support to immobilize GlossaryTerm
OA
on the surface of SPE and then to perform indirect competitive immunoassay using differential pulse voltammetry as a method of electrochemical detection [116]. Modifications of this automated flow-through amperometric immunosensor were performed for highly sensitive detection of GlossaryTermOA
[117, 118]. Other sensors include the molecularly imprinted polymer (GlossaryTermMIP
)-based sensors that use templates to provide polymers with specific recognition properties and chemosensors based on the photoinduced electron transfer (GlossaryTermPET
) sensing of the toxins by synthetic fluorophores.5.1.4 Lateral Flow Immunochromatography
Lateral flow immunochromatographic assays are based on a competitive immunoassay format, similar to the home pregnancy test and provide a qualitative indication to the presence of GlossaryTerm
OA
and analogs, and GlossaryTermDA
. These methods also faced the same antibody cross-reactivity challenge.5.2 Enzymatic, Colorimetric, and Other Tests
Several studies based on the mechanism of action of GlossaryTerm
OA
-group toxins, inhibition of the enzyme PP2A, were designed and adapted. Some systems as fluorimetry or colorimetry were the most common employed [119, 120], although other as electrochemical biosensors were also reported [102, 121].Numerous colorimetric protein phosphatase inhibition assays have been recently reviewed [102, 103]. An enzymatic colorimetric test, OkaTest, based on the GlossaryTerm
OA
-group of toxins mechanism of action, was recently internationally validated to be used as an alternative or complementary to the reference method for monitoring the GlossaryTermOA
toxins group in molluscs [122] according to Commission Regulations (EC) No. 2074/2005 [123] and No. 15/2011 [124].Recently a ligand binding assay was developed to detect cyclic imine in the frame of the Atlantox project, within the Atlantic Area Operational Programme (Atlantox 2008-1/003): www.atlantox.com. This assay, under patent, is based on the mechanism of action of these toxins that act on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.
A fast, simple, and sensitive capillary electrophoresis-based immunoassay with electrochemical detection was developed for GlossaryTerm
STX
and analogs in shellfish. The method was based on competitive reactions between GlossaryTermHRP
-labeled antigen and free antigen with a limited amount of antibody [125].The feasibility of GlossaryTerm
OA
detection in real-time by using an acoustic wave platform with a microfluidic feature and an GlossaryTermELISA
-like protocol was recently reported [126].5.3 Receptor Binding Assay (RBA)
The receptor binding assay (GlossaryTerm
RBA
) is a high-throughput method for detection of toxins in extracts of seawater and shellfish. This method is based upon the competition between radiolabeled and unlabeled toxins for available receptor sites. The radioactive toxin is displaced from its receptor by toxin present in an unknown sample, thereby, reducing the total radioactivity. Thus, the amount of radioactively labeled toxin that is displaced is proportional to the amount of toxin in the unknown sample. Then, the toxin present in an unknown sample can be quantified by comparison to a standard curve obtained using pure toxin.GlossaryTerm
RBA
was developed from the isolation of GlossaryTermVGSC
obtained from animal tissues, and was basically implemented by competitive measures of radioactivity using tritiated saxitoxin ([H]-GlossaryTermSTX
) or brevetoxin (GlossaryTermPbTx
). Vieytes etal published a rapid and sensitive method that used channels obtained from rat brain membranes to detect GlossaryTermPSP
toxins. channels were coated onto microtiter plates and were used to develop a direct solid-phase binding assay [127]. Years later, more developed method was described by Doucette etal based on microplate scintillation technology. Good quantitative agreement of the assay with GlossaryTermMBA
and GlossaryTermHPLC
analysis of crude extracts of contaminated shellfish, as well as GlossaryTermPSP
toxin-producing algae, was observed [128]. Usup reported about binding properties of six saxitoxin congeners using [H]-GlossaryTermSTX
and a preparation rich in channels. In this study, EC50 values ranged from for GlossaryTermSTX
to for GTX5 [129].GlossaryTerm
RBA
has been refined in the last decade for the detection of GlossaryTermPSP
toxins. These methods suffer from limitations such as the availability of radio-labeled materials. Restrictions on the world-wide distribution of [H]-GlossaryTermSTX
imposed by the international Chemical Weapons Convention in 1997 served to other radiolabeled toxin development such as 11-[H]-tetrodotoxin (GlossaryTermTTX
) [130, 131]. In 2004, thanks to collaborative efforts among the US Food and Drug Administration (GlossaryTermFDA
), International Atomic Energy Agency (GlossaryTermIAEA
), and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (GlossaryTermNOAA
), the worldwide unavailability of H saxitoxin was solved temporarily. A relative stable [H] GlossaryTermSTX
is now distributed worldwide by GlossaryTermIAEA
and was used in collaborative trials of the GlossaryTermPSP
toxins using receptor binding assay [132]. The assay used a competition among GlossaryTermPSP
toxins, in shellfish extracts, and a labeled H GlossaryTermSTX
diHCl for binding to GlossaryTermVGSC
in a rat brain membrane preparation. Quantification of binding was carried out using a microplate or traditional scintillation counter. The study focused on the ability to measure the GlossaryTermPSP
toxicity of samples below, near, or slightly above the regulatory limit of GlossaryTermSTX
diHCl equiv/kg [1]. The correlation with the GlossaryTermMBA
(OMA 959.08) yielded a correlation coefficient (r2) of , while correlation with the precolumn oxidation GlossaryTermHPLC
method (OMA 2005.06) yielded a (r2) of . This method has been accepted as official method of analysis AOAC (OMA 2011.27) [133].Similar to GlossaryTerm
PSP
toxins method; GlossaryTermBTX
GlossaryTermRBA
is a functional bioassay in which an unknown quantity of nonradiolabeled GlossaryTermBTX
competes with radiolabeled GlossaryTermBTX
[H]GlossaryTermPbTx
-3, for the site receptor of GlossaryTermVGSC
. Although, the assay using direct detection of a radiolabeled probe, bound to rat brain membranes, is a simple and robust format of pharmacological assays; other variations have been also tested using phospholipid vesicles [134] and membranes from other animals than rats [135, 136]. More recently other study has compared various extracts of GlossaryTermBTX
using four independent methods: GlossaryTermRBA
, radioimmunoassay (GlossaryTermRIA
), neuroblastoma (N2A) cytotoxicity assay, and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (GlossaryTermLC-MS
). As determined by GlossaryTermLC
/GlossaryTermMS
, the GlossaryTermRBA
, GlossaryTermRIA
, and N2A cytotoxicity assay detected , , and of the total GlossaryTermBTX
concentration [137].GlossaryTerm
RBA
designed for GlossaryTermCTX
s traditionally measures the binding competition between GlossaryTermCTX
in the sample and a [H]GlossaryTermPbTx
standard for the channel receptor. The use of [H]GlossaryTermPbTx
is a necessity, as nowadays no tritiated GlossaryTermCTX
s is available. It should to be noted that GlossaryTermRBA
was successfully applied for monitoring programs on ciguatera risk in three islands of French Polynesia [138, 139].In the case of GlossaryTerm
ASP
toxins, the GlossaryTermRBA
quantifies GlossaryTermDA
activity by the competitive displacement of radiolabeled kainic acid from a cloned glutamate receptor by GlossaryTermDA
in a sample. In 1997, Van Dolah etal [140] reported the further development of the receptor assay using a cloned rat GLUR6 glutamate receptor. The limit of detection and selectivity of the assay were optimized through inclusion of the glutamate decarboxylase (GlossaryTermGLDC
) pretreatment step to eliminate potential interference due to high concentrations of endogenous glutamate in shellfish. However, as GlossaryTermGLDC
was difficult to obtain from suppliers, other variations were introduced [141].Due to limitations of the standard AOAC GlossaryTerm
MBA
for estimation of toxins levels there was a need for alternative testing protocols. The relevance of GlossaryTermRBA
tools is high, but the need for specific equipment and licensing requirement for the use of radiolabeled compounds may lead to obvious limitations in the application of this assay. Some main disadvantages include the high dependency on the receptor source, it does not provide any information on the toxin profile, it cannot be easily automated, and it has been validated only for a few toxins. However, GlossaryTermRBA
is adequately sensitive and more specific than GlossaryTermMBA
[45]. Attempts to modify this assay to use label other than tritiated forms has led to the development of a competitive GlossaryTermRBA
based upon the use of GlossaryTermBTX
-B2 labeled with a chemiluminescent acridinium moiety. The acridinium brevetoxin-B2 seems to be a promising alternative to the conventional radioactive ligand in order to avoid constraints associated with GlossaryTermRBA
[142, 46].6 Biotechnology Application for Phytoplankton Detection, Monitoring, and Toxins Production
Recent development and application of advanced technologies from the generically defined -omics sciences (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) coupled with bioinformatics platforms has already provided deep and often revolutionary shifts in understanding the ecology and evolution of phytoplankton species and bloom dynamics [143].
Harmful algal blooms (GlossaryTerm
HAB
s) are natural events that have become common in coastal waters worldwide during the last years, being recurrent in European coastal waters. The toxic microalgae responsible for these blooms are mainly dinoflagellates, which display heteromorphic life cycles, including motile planktonic stages, as well as immotile benthic resting cysts [144, 145].Monitoring of harmful species is important to understand population dynamic activities related to the exploitation of coastal areas. To distinguish species by their morphological characteristics, cells must be examined by light, epifluorescence, or electron microscopy. This can be time consuming, and requires taxonomic expertise. Moreover, in some cases, morphology-based diagnostic tests lead to misidentification due to the existence of morphologically closely related species. Molecular methods, generally based on the GlossaryTerm
DNA
probe hybridization and GlossaryTermPCR
techniques, have been developed for the rapid and sensitive identification of GlossaryTermHAB
species [145, 146, 147]. The target GlossaryTermDNA
genes are generally within ribosomal GlossaryTermRNA
operons, which are repeated in high copy number in the microalgae genome and can be genus or species specific, as 18S, 28S, 5.8S, GlossaryTermITS
1, and GlossaryTermITS
2 among others.6.1 Genomics
Conventional genomics is often based upon the sequencing and annotation of whole genomes, with subsequent bioinformatics focus on the structure and function of key groups of genes. However, the ability to perform genetics experiments with microalgae has been accelerated in recent years by the availability of genome sequences. The application of emerging genomics techniques to phytoplankton research is likely to become widespread in the future.
6.1.1 Sequencing
Currently, there are more marine cyanobacterial genome sequences available than eukaryotic phytoplankton genome sequences, primarily due to differences in genome size and complexity. The average cyanobacterial genome size is – million base pairs (GlossaryTerm
Mbp
), although they range up to . In contrast, eukaryotic genomes tend to be orders of magnitude larger [148]. Completed genome projects have focused on species with relatively small genomes, ranging from [149] up to [150]. The recent availability of marine phytoplankton genome sequences has prompted a wealth of research in diverse fields including ecology, evolution, biochemistry, and biotechnology.Concerning eukaryotic marine phytoplankton, it must be considered that it includes phylogenetic lineages resulting from primary, secondary, and tertiary endosymbiosis events. This phylogenetic and physiological diversity is translated into a wide range of potential genome sizes, structures, metabolic pathways, life histories, and evolutionary relationships. Of the four major lineages of eukaryotic phytoplankton, whole genome sequences are currently available for two; the heterokonts [150, 151] and the prasinophytes [149, 152]. Additional members of the heterokont and haptophyte lineages are in the pipeline for sequencing or draft genomes are being analyzed (e. g., the haptophyte Emiliania huxleyi; http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Emihu1/Emihu1.home.html) [148].
Genomics are more than simply genome sequencing including transcriptional analyses of both sequenced [153, 154] and unsequenced organisms [155], and also targeted metagenomics of ecologically important but uncultured phytoplankton [156].
One of the challenges in examining structural diversity in eukaryotic phytoplankton is the large number of novel genes identified in each newly sequenced genome that have no homology to genes with known or suspected functions. Often, they are similar only to genes of unknown function in closely related organisms. Depending on the genome, the number of novel genes ranges from to nearly highlighting the limitations of homology-based approaches. Differences in gene structure (e. g., novel splice sites, signal peptides, and untranslated regions) constitute a challenge to gene-calling algorithms designed for higher plants and metazoans. One solution has been the development of tiling arrays for sequenced genomes [148] that differs from traditional microarrays in the nature of the probes. Instead of probing for sequences of known or predicted genes that may be dispersed throughout the genome, tiling arrays probe intensively for sequences which are known to exist in a contiguous region. This is useful for characterizing regions that are sequenced, but whose local functions are largely unknown. Using tiling arrays Mock etal [154] predicted new genes in the Thalassiosira pseudonana genome that were not previously identified using standard gene-calling algorithms. This of increase in the total number of genes predicted in the T. pseudonana genome suggests that gene density and number are not fully captured using standard gene-finding algorithms. Sequenced genomes also highlight the phylogenetic and metabolic diversity that characterizes marine phytoplankton. Description of new lineages, such as the uncultured picohaptophytes suggests that probably many ecologically important lineages have yet to be discovered [156].
Investment in genetic techniques both available and robust in a diverse array of marine phytoplankton will greatly help in understanding gene function, especially for the large number of hypothetical and conserved hypothetical genes [148]. New approaches have emerged and will continue to emerge that rely on genome sequence data. For example, whole genome microarrays include a range of targets such as all annotated genes or even the whole genome. New directions in this area will use genome information from diverse keystone species to create microarrays for use in characterizing environmental samples; GlossaryTerm
mRNA
sequencing approaches such as Illumina sequencing generate only short reads and can take advantage of available genomes to examine gene expression. For example, GlossaryTermmRNA
from two conditions is used to generate GlossaryTermcDNA
libraries that are sequenced to obtain quantitative gene expression profiles that can be compared.The application of these emerging genomics techniques to phytoplankton research is likely to become widespread in the future. One challenge beyond the genomics revolution is to apply these techniques in the marine environment to examine phytoplankton physiology in situ. This will mean synthesizing many different types of data simultaneously such as real-time physical and chemical environmental variables, community species composition, gene expression profiles, and protein signatures. This system-level approach has the potential to greatly expand our understanding of how phytoplankton acts in their environment [148].
6.1.2 PCR and Real-Time PCR (qPCR)
GlossaryTerm
qPCR
is a very promising technique in terms of sensitivity, specificity, enumeration capability, and costs reduction [145, 157]. Molecular approaches, when used together with other morphological characters, may help to solve taxonomical problems. The nuclear GlossaryTermrDNA
internal transcribed spacer regions and the 5.8S GlossaryTermrRNA
gene are widely used to characterize the phylogenetic aspects of a great variety of these organisms [147, 158, 159, 160].Even though these applications are very valuable regarding human health, the use of GlossaryTerm
PCR
and GlossaryTermqPCR
for the direct detection and identification as well as monitoring of toxic phytoplankton is of special interest. Several studies have been developed for simplex and multiplex detection of different groups, genus and/or species, as Alexandrium, Ostreopsis, or different cyanobacteria [161, 162, 163, 164]. It is important to highlight the fact that environmental samples often contain complex mixtures of organic matter, which may inhibit GlossaryTermPCR
/GlossaryTermqPCR
, thus an internal amplification control (GlossaryTermIAC
) should be included to avoid misinterpretation of false-negative results. Additionally, different strategies have been applied to overcome the problem of GlossaryTermPCR
/GlossaryTermqPCR
inhibition caused by contamination substances: the use of thermostable GlossaryTermDNA
polymerase, commercial nucleic acid extraction kits that remove inhibitors and facilitate purification, dilution of template GlossaryTermDNA
prior to GlossaryTermPCR
/GlossaryTermqPCR
assays and the use of bovine serum albumin in the GlossaryTermPCR
/GlossaryTermqPCR
assay [144, 163]. Several studies have been published applying GlossaryTermPCR
/GlossaryTermqPCR
for monitoring GlossaryTermHAB
worldwide, from the Mediterranean Sea to Australia [157, 164, 165, 166].Regarding toxin quantification/detection, it is more often performed by other techniques, but different studies have also been performed applying GlossaryTerm
PCR
/GlossaryTermqPCR
. In 2011, Murray etal developed a method targeting the unique core gene sxtA to identify saxitoxin-producing GlossaryTermHAB
s in Australian marine water [165]. Their method was tested against different species and strains of Alexandrium, Ostreopsis, Gymnodinium among others. Al-Tebrineh etal also developed a GlossaryTermqPCR
method capable of detecting SXT producing species, but they took advantage of the higher throughput of multiplex formats of GlossaryTermqPCR
and also targeted the genes coding for microcystin (mcy), nodularin (nda), cylindrospermopsin (cyr) in a multiplex GlossaryTermqPCR
experiment to specifically detect toxin producing species [163].6.1.3 Microarrays
In a microarray study, gene-specific probes are spotted onto precise positions on a solid surface and targeted with an unknown GlossaryTerm
DNA
or GlossaryTermRNA
sample. Microarrays represent the scaling up, miniaturization, and automation of well-known hybridization techniques. Recently, a FP7 European research project called MIDTAL (Microarrays for the detection of toxic algae) aimed to construct a universal microarrayfor the detection of harmful algae and their toxins (http://www.midtal.com/). Results obtained showed the third generation of the MIDTAL microarray that includes between and probes for various toxic algal species including GlossaryTermASP
, GlossaryTermDSP
, and GlossaryTermPSP
producers. The designed microarray has great potential to be used as a monitoring tool for toxic algae detecting multiple species simultaneously although improvements in GlossaryTermRNA
extraction and tests are still needed [167]. The most obvious advantage of the microarray is its ability to identify species that cannot be identified with traditional methods, such as Pseudo-nitzschia, Alexandrium, and Heterosigma [168, 169].6.1.4 Other Genomic Techniques
Other techniques different from sequencing and GlossaryTerm
PCR
have been also applied in phytoplankton studies. These include restriction fragment length polymorphism (GlossaryTermRFLP
), the first GlossaryTermDNA
-based technique used in phytoplankton studies; denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (GlossaryTermDGGE
); single stranded conformation polymorphism (GlossaryTermSSCP
); random amplified polymorphic GlossaryTermDNA
(GlossaryTermRAPD
); amplified fragment length polymorphism (GlossaryTermAFLP
); Microsatellites or short sequence repeats (GlossaryTermSSR
s); molecular probes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (GlossaryTermSNP
s). Most of these techniques were quite useful to study phytoplankton especially when no sequences were available because they can be used without prior knowledge of the genome [170].6.2 Transcriptomics
Transcriptomic studies gather efforts to isolate all the GlossaryTerm
RNA
transcripts, i. e., the transcriptome, from a sample of cells, and determine the presence and abundance of each particular species of gene-encoding GlossaryTermRNA
or GlossaryTermmRNA
. These studies help to elucidate genes involved in nutrient acquisition and metabolism (including those involved in synthesizing or regulating the synthesis of toxic molecules), aid in annotating genomes, and also have the potential to find novel transcripts or transcripts with unusual structures that may hint at the mechanism of gene regulation [143, 171, 172].For many organisms with either large and/or complex genomes, transcriptome sequencing may be a more immediate and cost-effective route than whole genome sequencing to obtain ecological and evolutionary information.
An expressed sequence tag or GlossaryTerm
EST
is a short subsequence of a GlossaryTermcDNA
. They may be used to identify gene transcripts in gene discovery and sequence determination. The identification of GlossaryTermEST
s has proceeded rapidly, with approximately GlossaryTermEST
s now available in public databases (e. g., GenBank 1 January 2013, all species). The GlossaryTermcDNA
s used for GlossaryTermEST
generation are typically individual clones from a GlossaryTermcDNA
library. The resulting sequence is a relatively low quality fragment whose length is limited by current technology to approximately – nucleotides. Because these clones consist of GlossaryTermDNA
that is complementary to GlossaryTermmRNA
, the GlossaryTermEST
s represent portions of expressed genes. They may be represented in databases as either GlossaryTermcDNA
/GlossaryTermmRNA
sequence or as the reverse complement of the GlossaryTermmRNA
, the template strand. GlossaryTermEST
s can be mapped to specific chromosome locations using physical mapping techniques, such as radiation hybrid mapping, Happy mapping, or GlossaryTermFISH
. Alternatively, if the genome of the organism that originated the GlossaryTermEST
has been sequenced, one can align the GlossaryTermEST
sequence to that genome using a computer.GlossaryTerm
EST
analysis of the dinoflagellate A. minutum revealed genes that were differentially expressed between isolates that produced GlossaryTermPSP
toxins and those that did not [173]. In terms of the functional ecology of A. minutum, the genes are putative candidates for genes involved in toxin synthesis and regulation or acclimation to intracellular GlossaryTermPSP
toxins. The sequences in the GlossaryTermEST
library also suggest that GlossaryTermPSP
toxins generated by this alveolate did not arise from a recent gene transfer from cyanobacteria, as was previously hypothesized [173]. Other dinoflagellate GlossaryTermEST
sequencing projects have yielded further insights into toxin production, predator–prey interactions, genome architecture, and trophic status. As sequencing costs drop and capabilities increase, transcriptome analyses of marine phytoplankton species and strains within species will soon become not only feasible but also common. This approach has also been recently applied to A. ostenfeldii [143, 174].6.3 Proteomics
The field of proteomics is complementary to genomics and transcriptomics since it provides additional information on gene expression and regulation. Proteomics include the determination of protein expression levels and protein–protein interaction studies. Moreover, proteomics aim to identify posttranslational modifications of proteins, as well as the organization of proteins in multiprotein complexes and their localization in tissues [172].
In the past decade, genomics began to explore the diversity, cellular evolution and adaptive abilities of marine phytoplankton. Although this has provided the community with a huge amount of information, it is not necessarily being translated into biochemical expression or phenotype. Genomics demonstrates which genes are shared, but proteomics can show clearer relationships by illustrating functional similarities and phenotypic variances. With a well-designed experiment, researchers can examine the conditions under which a protein is expressed; its cellular location, the relative quantities, and what protein–protein interactions take place [175].
Chan etal [176, 177] studied protein profiles under different environmental conditions found in Prorocentrum triestinum. He showed both constancy of protein profiles and variability of the relative abundance of some proteins under different and culture conditions. Differentially expressed protein patterns of P. triestinum indicated that P. triestinum growing under nitrogen-limited conditions possessed higher growth potential since its protein expression profiles are more similar to that of the blooming stage. These results are consistent with the observations that it is possible to rapidly trigger a bloom by the addition of a supply of nitrates. A more detailed analysis of the differential synthesis of proteins in these various stages and studies to elucidate the functions of these proteins will be critical for understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in blooming. Phytoplankton proteomic approaches that use whole genome sequences to examine protein expression by matching protein GlossaryTerm
MS
/MS spectra to those predicted from whole genome sequences are already available [150]. Cell surface proteins (GlossaryTermCSP
s) of Alexandrium catenella have been also studied in detail. Protein profiles at different toxin biosynthesis stages, were analyzed and differentially expressed proteins were identified. These were involved in various biological processes, nine of which might be involved in the GlossaryTermPST
biosynthesis of A. catenella using the quantitative proteomic approach to compare protein profiles at different toxin biosynthesis stages.Proteomics studies should help to reveal the toxin biosynthesis mechanisms and pathways in dinoflagellates [178]. Proteomics has provided valuable information on the effects and also the mode action of the dinoflagellate metabolite yessotoxin on a human liver cell line. Also, analysis of the plastid proteome of the Florida red tide dinoflagellate K. brevis detected an electron transfer protein (plastocyanin) inherited from green algae that may contribute to ecological success in iron use. Nevertheless, much promise remains to be fulfilled in the application of proteomics to studies of GlossaryTerm
HAB
ecophysiology and bloom dynamics [179].6.4 Metabolomics
The term metabolomics is usually defined as the comprehensive and quantitative analysis of all small molecules in a biological system [180]. Metabolomics allows monitoring and mapping the dynamic range of bioactive secondary metabolites under different conditions. The most commonly used gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GlossaryTerm
GC-TOF-MS
)-based method facilitates the identification and robust quantification of a few hundred metabolites. The merging of metabolomics and metagenomics has the potential to be a particularly powerful combination in shedding light on planktonic and microbial interactions in marine ecosystems. Statistical evaluation of data provides insight into the metabolic changes within the cells as well as into the released metabolites. The knowledge of the complex patterns of chemicals released by microalgae will reveal new mechanisms for processes such as: community function, food location, or complex defensive and allelopathic interactions [181].A great number of metabolic pathways and regulatory mechanisms could be predicted based on the genomic sequences. Nevertheless, some of the genes might not be functional in vivo. Recent technical developments make metabolomics a suitable tool to define their genes function and regulation in microalgae. Analyses of diatom genomes have suggested tight connection between a number of novel pathways and regulatory steps in diatom metabolism. However, there are still several important open questions to be addressed. Given the massive recent acceleration in genome sequencing capacities we will shortly have an enormous resource of genetic information for marine phytoplankton. Combining this information with details on their metabolic complement will greatly enhance our understanding of the metabolic processes by and how they interact with their environment, as well as the evolution of their underlying metabolic pathways [182].
Metabolomics approach has already been successfully applied to the dinoflagellate endosymbiont Symbiodinium [179]. As an emerging technique, metabolomics have not been widely applied in toxic phytoplankton studies, but some research groups are developing databases for identification of marine biotoxins using metabolomics approaches [183].
7 Potential Pharmacological Uses of Phycotoxins
In the past few decades, extensive studies have been devoted to investigate the toxicology and pharmacology of biotoxins [184, 185]. A renewed interest is seen in marine alkaloids and their analogues, including the GlossaryTerm
STX
-group toxins (GlossaryTermSTX
s), with regards to their use as therapeutic agents or as a drug lead [186]. GlossaryTermSTX
s bioactivity studies and molecular modeling could lead to the design of unnatural analogs with improved pharmaceutical characteristics. Recently, a group of toxins isolated from marine cone snails (genus Conus), known as conotoxins, have been shown to contain over peptide analogs. Conotoxins are able to specifically target a broad range of ion channels and membrane receptors and are currently under investigation for possible clinical trials. In 2004, a synthetic version of a conotoxin analogue, ω-conotoxin MVIIA, also known as ziconotide (trade name Prialt) was the first marine natural product to be approved for use by the US GlossaryTermFDA
[186]. Ziconotide acts by targeting N-type voltage sensitive channels and is used for the treatment of chronic pain in spinal cord injury.Ion channels triggered by voltage changes along the cell membrane are termed voltage-gated ion channels (GlossaryTerm
VGIC
s), include channels that conduct , and . Activation of or VGICs produces cell stimulation by membrane depolarization, while channel activation results in inhibitory hyperpolarization. Toxins that bind GlossaryTermVGIC
s can serve as powerful molecular probes to study the channel structure and function, as well as serve as models for studying evolutionary targets and drug discovery [187]. Some marine biotoxins are classified as neurotoxins due to their ability to interact with these channels [188]. As we will discuss later in this section many marine biotoxins have affinity by one or more GlossaryTermVGIC
s and therefore could have an important pharmaceutical potential.7.1 Lipophilic Toxins (LTs)
7.1.1 Okadaic Acid-Group (OA) Toxins and Pectenotoxin-Group Toxins
GlossaryTerm
OA
is a marine biotoxin that presents a great value in medical research and has facilitated the understanding of several cellular processes [189]. GlossaryTermOA
-group toxins have interest due to their high cytotoxic activity and the extraordinary ability to promote tumors [190, 191]. It is considered that their effect varies depending on the cell type and concentration used [192].It has been a model for analyzing therapeutic effects of some drugs in treating neurodegenerative diseases [193]. GlossaryTerm
OA
acts as a potent neurotoxin that induces apoptotic events in various cell lines and promotes tumors in several organs. Mechanisms are dependent on cell type, the antioxidant status of each cell and the ability to metabolize GlossaryTermOA
[194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199].GlossaryTerm
OA
-group toxins are specific inhibitors of PP1 and PP2A that are involved in the regulation of many cellular processes and modulate the extent of phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of proteins. Other cellular targets for GlossaryTermOA
have been suggested [189, 200, 201, 202, 203]. GlossaryTermOA
has been used to analyze the mechanisms by which the conjugated linoleic acids can act as antitumor agents in breast cancer cells due to its activity as an inhibitor of PP2A [189]. In addition it has been reported that the extent of GlossaryTermOA
-induced injuries and the toxin organotrophicity are dose-related and may be determined by the administration route. After intravenous administration, GlossaryTermOA
acts as a hepatotoxin with undetectable effects on the intestine but also has an impact on cytoskeletal elements at sublethal doses [204].GlossaryTerm
PTX
s are potent cytotoxic compounds against several human cancer cell lines. They are hepatotoxic whose mechanism of action has not yet been fully elucidated [205, 206, 207]. Among other effects, the induction of apoptosis in rat hepatocytes, in salmon and p53-deficient cell lines have been reported [208].GlossaryTerm
PTX
2 is an inhibitor of actin and cytokinesis and it is known to be used as a chemotherapeutic agent against tumors type p53 [209]. It was demonstrated that a loss of p53 sensitizes tumor cells to actin damage. GlossaryTermPTX
2 was first identified as a cytotoxic entity in marine sponges, which depolymerizes actin filaments and it was found to be highly effective and more potent to activate an intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in p53-deficient tumor cells compared to those with functional p53 both in vitro and in vivo. Other agents that depolymerize or knot actin filaments were also found to be toxic to p53-deficient tumors. In p53-deficient cells, GlossaryTermPTX
2 triggers apoptosis through mitochondrial dysfunction, and this is followed by the release of proapoptotic factors and caspase activation. Furthermore, Bax activation and Bim induction was observed only in p53-deficient cells after GlossaryTermPTX
2 treatment. Therefore, these results suggest that Bim triggers apoptosis by activating Bax in p53-deficient tumors upon actin damage, and that actin inhibitors may be potent chemotherapeutic agents against p53-deficient tumors.Recent studies demonstrated that this congener do not induce diarrhea or any other signs of disease by oral administration. Body distribution of GlossaryTerm
PTX
2 and GlossaryTermPTX
2 seco acid (GlossaryTermPTX2SA
) was analyzed in mice after oral and intraperitoneally administration. Cytotoxicity assays in vitro have been the first step to the discovery of many drugs used in antitumor therapy. However, more information is needed about its toxicity to humans and their pharmacokinetics [210].7.1.2 Yessotoxins-Group Toxins
YTXs are polyether compounds that were discovered due to their high acute toxicity during GlossaryTerm
MBA
by GlossaryTermi.p.
, injection for lipophilic toxin analysis of mollusks [211, 212]. There are no published reports of human poisonings caused by YTXs and no available data on chronic exposure, carcinogenicity, or genotoxicity [213]. Various authors have suggested that the target organ following GlossaryTermi.p.
administration is the heart [214]; however, other authors consider that YTX is involved in neurological disorders and its main target is the thymus [215]. Tereo etal have reported severe microscopic alterations in cardiac muscle [214]. Difference between these studies is not clear and has been proposed that discrepancies may be due to different purities of the toxins and the use of different strains of mice [213]. YTX administration to human lymphocytes leads to an increase in cytosolic concentration [20] and in specific activity of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase , [216]. Other studies have reported that cellular homeostasis is not related to its cytotoxic effect [217]. Furthermore, YTX causes dose-dependent decrease in the levels of GMPc and AMPc after incubation due to the activity of phosphodiesterases. These effects depend on and can be changed by phosphodiesterases [216, 218].YTX induced a decrease in F-actin filaments in several cell models as cerebellar granule cells (GlossaryTerm
CGC
s), mouse fibroblast, rat L3, mouse myoblast cell lines, and GlossaryTermMCF
-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cells [217, 219]. However, this seems not to be a universal effect, since no effects over F-actin levels were detected in M17 neuroblastoma cell line, in rabbit enterocytes, or in human Caco-2 cells [220, 221]. YTXs cause selective disruption of the E-cadherin-catenin in epithelial cells and could potentially suppress tumor functions of E-cadherin [222]. Pathway degradation of E-cadherin is affected by YTX at long incubation times and low doses. Since E-cadherin has been linked to tumor spreading and metastasis, it has been a concern if the disruption of E-cadherin by YTX could affect tumor expansion in YTX-contaminated mollusk consumers. However, in vivo experiments demonstrated that although the resulting molecule of E-cadherin disruption had increased, YTXs did not induce any effect on E-cadherin system in in vivo experiments [223].YTX-induced apoptotic events in different cellular lines, including cancer cells, primary cell cultures, and cell lines. There are reports related to YTX-induced apoptosis in rat hepatocytes, rat glioma cells, GlossaryTerm
HeLa
S3 cells, rat cerebellar neurons, BE(2) neuroblastoma cell line, L6 myoblast cell line, BC3H1 myoblast cell line, mouse fibroblast NIH3T3 cell line, CaCo-2 cells, GlossaryTermMCF
-7 cancer cells, and GlossaryTermHepG2
cell cultures. In this sense, YTX could be used in therapeutic applications, for instance, as an antitumor drug [224]. Thus, the European patent application EP1875906 [225] considers to use YTX as an antitumor drug, and protoceratin I, the major compound with cytotoxic activity against human tumor cell lines isolated from P. cf. reticulatum, was proved to be identical to homo YTX [226].It has also been investigated the activity of various YTXs analogs on GlossaryTerm
MCF
-7 tumor cell lines; structural modification in homoYTX do not change the activity of the toxin, while the side chain structure of carbon seems essential. Thus, carboxiYTX and hidroxihomoYTX present less activity than YTX [227]. These data have been confirmed by kinetic studies between phosphodiesterases and YTX, hidroxiYTX and carboxiYTX, proving the lower affinity between these proteins and the last two analogs [228].7.1.3 Azaspiracid-Group Toxins
Molecular targets of these toxins are not well known, but some studies were focused on the study of second messengers: increased intracellular and AMPc [229, 230, 231, 232], effects of reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton [233, 234, 235, 236] and effects on adhesion by activation of adhesion protein fractionation (claudins and cadherins) [234, 237, 238].
Although, symptoms observed during episodes of GlossaryTerm
AZA
s poisoning were similar to those typically observed with GlossaryTermDSP
, administration of toxic GlossaryTermAZA
s materials to mice led to great differences with the GlossaryTermDSP
. Mice injected with low doses of GlossaryTermAZA
s did not present diarrhea [239], and in a few hours develop slowly progressive paralysis, difficulty in breathing, and finally death [240]. A GlossaryTermi.p.
dose appears to be the minimal lethal dose in mice to GlossaryTermAZA
1 while GlossaryTermAZA
3 and GlossaryTermAZA
2 showed a higher toxicity ( and , respectively) [240, 241]. Damages in liver, pancreas, spleen, thymus and stomach were observed. Moreover, after administration of GlossaryTermAZA
sublethal doses by gavage, alterations were observed in the small intestine, affecting epithelial cells with a degree of damage progressively increasing from to after administration [242, 243]. GlossaryTermAZA
cytotoxicity was first observed by Flanagan etal [244] in hepatoblastoma and bladder carcinoma cells exposed to contaminated crude mussel extract. Twiner etal [235] observed that GlossaryTermAZA
1 causes cytotoxicity in kidney, lung and immune, neuronal, and pituitary cells. However, neurons appear to be particularly sensitive to GlossaryTermAZA
s, causing irreversible morphological changes with relatively short exposure times and cytotoxicity with longer exposures to these toxins [231, 236]. It also requires longer exposure times to achieve complete cytotoxicity in primary cultures of cerebellar granule cells [200]. Also, they induce apoptosis through caspase activation [210, 245].GlossaryTerm
AZA
s are implicated in upregulation on gene expression and protein levels of low-density lipoprotein receptor (GlossaryTermLDLR
). This effect seems to be a response to the decreased level in intracellular cholesterol caused by GlossaryTermAZA
1 [25]. It was shown that T lymphocytes exposed to GlossaryTermAZA
1 up regulated gene expression and protein levels of GlossaryTermLDLR
due to decreased levels of intracellular cholesterol. Although premature to determine decisively, yet consistent with currently available in vitro data, GlossaryTermAZA
1 appears to be targeting a membrane protein such as a claudin, cadherin, or GlossaryTermLDLR
, in turn eliciting an effect on intracellular signaling molecules and the cytoskeleton, ultimately resulting in cytotoxicity.7.2 Hydrophilic Toxins
7.2.1 Saxitoxin-Group Toxins (PSP)
GlossaryTerm
STX
-group toxins are closely related water-soluble tetrahydropurine compounds acting by interfering with GlossaryTermVGSC
functioning. The toxin acts from the exterior of the cells by getting access to the extracellular cavity of the channel and binding to the so-called site of the α-subunit in the channel [246]. Site is shaped by a short portion (SS2) of the amino acid stretches connecting the S5 and S6 trans-membrane helices in the four domains of the α subunit, giving rise to a cavity that accommodates the toxin. GlossaryTermSTX
then forms hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions with the side chains of several amino acids that participate to the ion selectivity filter of the channel. The interaction of one GlossaryTermSTX
molecule with the site of the α-subunit in the channel essentially plugs the channel and blocks its ion flux. The loss of conductance in excitable cells prevents membrane depolarization and the transmission of the action potential, representing the molecular basis of the toxic effects of GlossaryTermSTX
. As a consequence of GlossaryTermVGSC
blockade, a progressive loss of neuromuscular function ensues, leading to the reported neurotoxic symptoms that can result in death by asphyxia. Skeletal analogs of GlossaryTermSTX
with a fused-type tricyclic ring system, designated FDSTX, were synthesized as candidate ion channel modulators [247]. Their inhibitory activity on ion channels was examined by means of cell-based assay. Two of the analogs showing moderate inhibitory activity were further evaluated by the use of the patch-clamp method in cells that expressed 1.4 (a GlossaryTermTTX
-sensitive channel subtype) and 1.5 (a GlossaryTermTTX
-resistant channel subtype). These compounds showed moderate inhibitory activity toward 1.4, and weaker inhibitory activity toward 1.5. Uniquely, however, the inhibition of 1.5 by one of the analogs was irreversible.Some GlossaryTerm
STX
s have demonstrated pharmaceutical potential as a long-term anesthetic in the treatment of anal fissures and for chronic tension-type headache. The recent elucidation of the GlossaryTermSTX
biosynthetic gene cluster in cyanobacteria and the identification of new GlossaryTermSTX
analogs will present opportunities to further explore the pharmaceutical potential of these intriguing alkaloids [186]. A specific suite of analogs can be isolated from a single GlossaryTermSTX
s-producing organism, which is directly a result of the evolution of genes present within the organism’s genome. Naturally occurring GlossaryTermSTX
s can also be precursors for extracellular metabolic or chemical transformations into new analogs. Knowledge of these transformations may have important implications for the detection, toxicity, and removal of GlossaryTermSTX
s from a contaminated source. Other medicinal uses for GlossaryTermSTX
s may become more established by screening the bioactivity of less toxic analogs, since their use as a potential local anesthetic has long been known. The characterization of GlossaryTermSTX
biosynthesis genes [165, 248] and their potential use in combinatorial biosynthesis, together with the constant discovery of novel analogs (either natural or transformed), is likely to expand the possibilities for their pharmaceutical use.GlossaryTerm
STX
also has a huge pharmaceutical potential for its ability to induce anesthesia through interaction with the GlossaryTermVGSC
[186]. It has been suggested that site blockers prolong the duration of anaesthesia in a synergistic manner when combined with other local anaesthetics. In spite of this, the push for GlossaryTermSTX
to enter clinical trials has been hindered by its systematic toxicity. The use of GlossaryTermSTX
as a slow release, prolonged anesthetic was recently demonstrated using a novel controlled release system in male rats. Liposomal formulations of GlossaryTermSTX
, either alone or in conjunction with dexamethasone and/or bupivacaine, were able to block the sciatic nerve in rats for long periods with no damaging myotoxic, cytotoxic, or neurotoxic effects and little associated inflammation. Liposome formulations of GlossaryTermSTX
for slow and site-directed release for prolonged anaesthesia have been postulated as a putative treatment of localized and severe joint pain.GTX2 and GTX3 also have clinical potential and have been utilized for the treatment of anal fissures by their direct injection into both sides of the fissure. A success rate of with remission after and days for acute and chronic conditions respectively was observed. Both toxins have also been used in the treatment of chronic tension type headache, with of patients responding to treatment. These studies recognize that several GlossaryTerm
STX
s have potential as future pharmaceutical leads; therefore, more investigation is needed in this field [6].NEO-GlossaryTerm
STX
has being developed as a local anesthetic. Doses of have been used by local infiltration in anesthetized adult humans without adverse effect. Wylie etal hypothesized that similar doses could cause significant respiratory, neuromuscular, and cardiovascular impairment [249].7.2.2 Domoic Acid (ASP)
GlossaryTerm
DA
belongs to the kainoid class of compounds, which is a class of excitatory neurotransmitters. Pharmacological studies reported that GlossaryTermDA
isomers are not as toxic as GlossaryTermDA
because they bind less strongly to the kainate receptor proteins than GlossaryTermDA
itself; however, 5-epi-domoic acid has a similar toxicity [35]. Mayer and Hamann [250] reviewed the available literature on pharmacological and toxicological studies with marine natural products including articles reporting on the bioactivity and/or pharmacology of marine chemicals. They included GlossaryTermDA
in the group of compounds that affect the immune system. Moreover they reported that GlossaryTermDA
at in vitro concentrations that were toxic to neuronal cells () was shown to trigger a limited activation of rat brain microglia, an immune cell type that contributes to circa of the total glial population in the central nervous system, and the concomitant release of two potentially neurotoxic mediators, namely GlossaryTermTNF
-α and matrix metalloproteinase-9.GlossaryTerm
DA
acts as a potent glutamate receptor agonist. Although mechanisms of domoic acid neurotoxicity are poorly defined, an excitotoxic mechanism is believed to be involved. GlossaryTermDA
inhibits astrocytes glutamate uptake in a dose-dependent manner, leading to accumulation of glutamate in the extracellular compartment and thus producing neurotoxicity [251].In vitro studies have shown that, depending on its concentration, GlossaryTerm
DA
causes necrotic or apoptotic cell death in mouse cerebellar granule neurons (GlossaryTermCGN
). Necrosis is observed at higher concentrations of GlossaryTermDA
() and involves activation of both GlossaryTermAMPA
/kainate and N-metyl-d-aspartic acid (GlossaryTermNMDA
) receptors, the latter activated by GlossaryTermDA
-induced glutamate release. In contrast, apoptotic damage predominates at lower concentrations of GlossaryTermDA
(e. g., ) and is solely due to activation of GlossaryTermAMPA
/kainate receptors [252]. Both, necrosis and apoptosis have been shown to be mediated by oxidative stress. Upon oral administration, GlossaryTermDA
is poorly absorbed, has a short half-life in blood, and poorly permeates the blood–brain barrier, limiting the access of low levels of GlossaryTermDA
in the central nervous system, but this might not be the case during development, a period of suggested particular sensitivity to GlossaryTermDA
neurotoxicity. The authors evaluated if a prolonged exposure to low GlossaryTermDA
levels would result in neurotoxicity and/or in altered susceptibility to a subsequent exposure in cultured mouse GlossaryTermCGN
s. Neurons from wild-type mice and from mice lacking the glutamate cysteine ligase (GlossaryTermGCL
) modifier subunit (Gclm ) (already known to be highly susceptible to GlossaryTermDA
neurotoxicity) were compared. They found that prolonged exposure to low-level GlossaryTermDA
in vitro provides protection against toxicity of a higher GlossaryTermDA
acute exposure, apparently due to the ability of chronic low dose of GlossaryTermDA
to up-regulate glutathione (GlossaryTermGSH
) synthesis. Genetic conditions leading to low GlossaryTermGSH
levels, which already increase susceptibility to GlossaryTermDA
neurotoxicity, could potentially negate such protective mechanisms [252].7.3 Other Toxins
7.3.1 Ciguatoxins (CTXs)
GlossaryTerm
CFP
is the most frequently reported seafood-toxin illness in the world. It produces gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, neurologic, and neuropsychiatric symptoms which can last from days to even months. GlossaryTermCTX
s derive from benthic dinoflagellates and are transferred through the food web from the algae to herbivorous and carnivorous fish, and finally to humans.GlossaryTerm
CTX
s are among the most potent natural substances known. One of the Pacific Ocean ciguatoxins, GlossaryTermP-CTX
-1, poses a health risk at concentrations as low as – although GlossaryTermCTX
s rarely accumulates in fish at levels that are lethal to humans [253]. GlossaryTermCTX
s activate the GlossaryTermVGSC
s in cell membranes, which increases ion permeability and depolarizes the nerve cell. This depolarization is believed to cause the array of neurological signs associated with GlossaryTermCFP
. Voltage-clamp studies suggested that GlossaryTermCTX
s cause spontaneous, and enhance evoked, action potentials by lowering activation thresholds and delayed repolarization of GlossaryTermVGSC
s. Several studies further elucidated cellular effects and molecular mechanisms of GlossaryTermCTX
s actions including selective binding and competition with GlossaryTermBTX
for site 5 on GlossaryTermVGSC
s, elevation of intracellular levels, stimulation of spontaneous and evoked neurotransmitter release from synaptosomes and motor nerve terminals, axonal and Schwann cell edema, induction of GlossaryTermTTX
-sensitive leakage current in dorsal root ganglion neurons and blockade of voltage-gated potassium channels [254]. Neurological symptoms are consistent with GlossaryTermCTX
s’ interactions with GlossaryTermVGSC
s; however, all the symptoms produced during GlossaryTermCFP
may not be exclusively due to GlossaryTermVGSC
s [46]. The chronic fatigue syndrome that may last for weeks or months has been related to high nitric oxide () production. Penil and muscular relaxation, as well as L-type channel activation, were shown to be GlossaryTermNO
-mediated via the nitric oxide synthetase pathway.GlossaryTerm
CTX
also caused rapid hypothermia in mice, which lose their ability to regulate their own body temperature and became poikilothermic. This reduction in body core temperature was found to be due to neuroexcitatory actions of ciguatera on regions of the brain stem receiving vagal afferents and ascending pathways associated with visceral and thermoregulatory responses [255]. These authors reported a complete review on the pharmacological effects of GlossaryTermCTX
s, including cardiovascular and gastrointestinal effects, effects on other smooth muscle, actions on ganglionic and neuromuscular transmission and on GlossaryTermVGIC
, and other -dependent actions. Despite the multiple pharmacological effects no medical applications of these toxins have been reported so far.7.3.2 Brevetoxin-Group Toxins
GlossaryTerm
BTX
s are lipid soluble cyclic polyethers (M.W. ) and potent neurotoxins that open GlossaryTermVGSC
s leading to influx into the cell. GlossaryTermBTX
s exert their toxicity by interacting with neurotoxin receptor site 5 associated with domain IV of the α subunit of the GlossaryTermVGSC
. GlossaryTermBTX
s binding to tissues that contain GlossaryTermVGSC
s on excitable cells results in membrane depolarization, repetitive firing, and increase in currents [256]. At the channel, at least four actions of GlossaryTermBTX
s have been identified leading to the depolarization of excitable cell membranes: shift of the voltage dependence, inhibition of inactivation, increase of mean open times and multiple subconductance levels. A description of these actions and the mammalian GlossaryTermBTX
s toxicity was recently review [63].GlossaryTerm
BTX
s exert a variety of actions in vivo affecting both the peripheral as well as the central nervous systems, probably due to their high lipid solubility and ability to penetrate the blood–brain barrier. Humans exposed to the toxin usually exhibit neurotoxic shellfish poisoning symptoms, which include nausea, difficulties in movement, and seizures [257]. Cellular effects associated with exposure to GlossaryTermBTX
s have been observed in the immune system of many species, although the mechanisms of action of GlossaryTermBTX
s on immune cells and immune competence are not well understood. Several potential mechanisms for GlossaryTermBTX
immunotoxicity have been suggested, including the inhibition of cathepsin, apoptosis, release of inflammatory mediators, and oxidative stress [58]. In vitro experiments have demonstrated possible GlossaryTermDNA
damage, chromosomal aberrations and effects on cellular growth [256, 258]. Other immune system effects include mast cell degranulation [259] and histamine release which may contribute to observed airway responses following the inhalation of aerosolized GlossaryTermBTX
s.There are over different GlossaryTerm
BTX
s isolated in seawater blooms and K. brevis cultures, as well as multiple analogs and derivatives from the metabolism of shellfish and other organisms [58]. Cao etal [260], quantified the potencies and efficacies of an array of lipophilic GlossaryTermVGSC
s gating modifiers by measuring influx in murine neocortical neurons. An assay using a -sensitive fluorescent dye to primary cultures of neurons afforded a highly quantitative assessment of the increments in neuronal level produced by gating modifier toxins. The relative efficacies differ substantially; the rank order of efficacy of several naturally occurring GlossaryTermBTX
s and semisynthetic analogs as channel gating modifiers was GlossaryTermPbTx
-1 GlossaryTermPbTx
-desoxydioxolane GlossaryTermPbTx
-2 GlossaryTermPbTx
-3 GlossaryTermPbTx
-3α-naphthoate. K. brevis cultures also produce shorter ring structures, hemi-GlossaryTermBTX
s and brevenals, likely to be incomplete products of the GlossaryTermBTX
biosynthetic pathway. These smaller cyclic ether ring structures exhibit reduced biological activity, yet they are still consistent with a site of action common to the GlossaryTermBTX
s [63]. An interesting discovery was the finding that brevenal (produced both in K. brevis laboratory cultures and in the environment during K. brevis blooms), is a brevetoxin antagonist. This is a case of a toxin producing organism that also secretes its own antagonist. Brevenal is synthesized by K. brevis in significant amounts and it acts at a different receptor site on nerve cells than the brevetoxins. It is a new and important natural product which could treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cystic fibrosis [58].Taupin [261] studied the activity of four generic formulae of GlossaryTerm
BTX
derivatives – formulae I–IV – and their compounds on the growth of neurites. He reported that GlossaryTermBTX
derivatives stimulate neurite growth, particularly the growth of minor processes from which the axons form, on neurons in primary cultures. The activity is mediated by VGNC and the N-methyl-d-aspartate-mediated intracellular pathway. They proposed the use of GlossaryTermBTX
derivatives for enhancing neuronal growth and for the treatment of neurodegenerative and neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral strokes, traumatic brain, and spinal cord injuries.7.3.3 Tetrodotoxin
GlossaryTerm
TTX
is a very well-known marine neurotoxin due to its frequent involvement in fatal food poisoning, unique chemical structure, and specific action of blocking channels of excitable membranes [262]. The toxicity of GlossaryTermTTX
relates to two factors: paralysis of skeletal muscle, including the diaphragm and intercostal muscles, leading to respiratory failure, and reduced blood pressure, predominantly due to vasodilatation. Early signs of this effect might include weakness, tingling of the lips and dizziness [70]. Pharmacological activity of GlossaryTermTTX
on various animals, their organs and tissues has been extensively studied, and it was found that GlossaryTermTTX
strongly inhibits nerve conduction and has inhibitory effects on --ATPase activity. Recently, GlossaryTermTTX
has been shown to block L-type current (ICa) in canine cardiac cells [263]. These authors studied the GlossaryTermTTX
-sensitivity of Ca in isolated canine ventricular myocytes as a function of channel phosphorylation, extracellular pH, and the redox potential of the bathing medium using the whole cell voltage clamp technique. They demonstrated that GlossaryTermTTX
inhibits L-type Ca channels in the heart by binding to its selectivity filter.GlossaryTerm
TTX
has been extensively used to elucidate the role of specific GlossaryTermVGSC
s subtypes in a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological processes in the nervous system. GlossaryTermVGSC
s play a key role in pain and GlossaryTermTTX
-sensitive subtypes have received much attention over the past few years because these channels have been strongly implicated in normal and pathological pain. Since GlossaryTermTTX
blocks this subset of GlossaryTermVGSC
s in a highly selective manner, this toxin may have a potential role in relieving pain [264, 265]. Nieto etal [266] evaluated the effect of the acute systemic administration of low, nontoxic, doses of GlossaryTermTTX
on the expression of different signs (heat hyperalgesia, mechanical- and cold allodynia) of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain in mice. They reported that low doses of GlossaryTermTTX
can be useful to prevent and treat this pain since inhibited hyperresponsiveness to thermal and mechanical stimuli. Their findings suggest that GlossaryTermTTX
-sensitive subtypes of channels play a role in the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.Hagen etal [267] evaluated the analgesic activity of GlossaryTerm
TTX
administered subcutaneously in a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel design study, in patients with moderate or severe unrelieved cancer pain. This trial suggested that GlossaryTermTTX
could potentially relieve moderate to severe, treatment-resistant cancer pain in a large proportion of patients, and often for prolonged periods following treatment. In a later study [268] it was assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous GlossaryTermTTX
treatment in reducing the intensity of chronic cancer-related pain. They conducted a multicenter open-label longitudinal trial, in which GlossaryTermTTX
was administered subcutaneously for days in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with persistent pain. Onset of pain relief in no more than half the patients was typically cumulative over days, and after administration ended, the analgesic effect subsided over the course of a few weeks. Toxicity was usually mild or moderate and remained so through subsequent treatment cycles, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity or tolerance. They concluded that long-term treatment with GlossaryTermTTX
is associated with acceptable toxicity and, in a substantial minority of patients, resulted in a sustained analgesic effect. Berde etal [70] reported that prolonged duration percutaneous sciatic nerve blockade could be achieved in rats using combinations of site channel toxins with either bupivacaine or epinephrine. Addition of either bupivacaine or epinephrine increases the LD of GlossaryTermTTX
in rats, i. e., reduces systemic toxicity from GlossaryTermTTX
, and also increases the potency of GlossaryTermTTX
by producing sensory blockade, thereby substantially improving the therapeutic index of GlossaryTermTTX
. Thus, combination of formulations seems desirable from the standpoint of both efficacy and safety. GlossaryTermTTX
, formulated as Tectin, underwent Phase III trials as an injectable systemic analgesic for chronic cancer pain. Berde etal [70] examined dose–duration relationships and sciatic nerve histology following local nerve blocks with combinations of Tectin with bupivacaine solutions, with or without epinephrine in rats. Three-way combinations of GlossaryTermTTX
, bupivacaine and epinephrine produced significant prolonged sciatic nerve blockade in rats, compared to bupivacaine plain or bupivacaine epinephrine. Their studies indicate that clinically relevant combinations of Tectin with commercially available bupivacaine and epinephrine warrant further study for prolonged-duration local anesthesia. Moreover they suggest that a single-injection approach to prolonged local anesthesia would provide good pain relief as a component of multimodal analgesic regimens, reducing postoperative opioid requirements and improving the course of postoperative recovery and acute rehabilitation.A review by Nieto etal [269] focuses on the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting a potential analgesic role for GlossaryTerm
TTX
. In addition they compiled data on the contribution of specific GlossaryTermTTX
-sensitive GlossaryTermVGSC
s to pain. They conclude that the therapeutic use of GlossaryTermTTX
as an analgesic agent seems hopeful although further preclinical and clinical research is needed to clarify its potential use during painful conditions. Wang etal [270] examined the effect of GlossaryTermTTX
, applied topically to the rat cornea, on the duration of corneal anesthesia, administered with either proparacaine (GlossaryTermPPC
) or the chemical permeation enhancer octyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide (GlossaryTermOTAB
). The effect of test solutions on corneal healing was also studied. Combination of GlossaryTermTTX
and GlossaryTermPPC
resulted in corneal anesthesia that was to times longer in duration than that from either drug administered alone, whereas GlossaryTermOTAB
did not prolong anesthesia. The rate of corneal healing was moderately delayed after coadministration of GlossaryTermTTX
and GlossaryTermPPC
. They concluded that coadministration of GlossaryTermTTX
and GlossaryTermPPC
significantly prolonged corneal anesthesia, but in view of delayed corneal reepithelialization, caution is suggested in the use of the drug combination.Bragadeeswaran etal [262] isolated three GlossaryTerm
TTX
-producing bacteria (Kytococcus sedentarius, Cellulomonas fimi and Bacillus species) from the pufferfish Arothron hispidus. Their partially purified filtrates exhibited hemolytic activity on chicken and human erythrocytes and also presented ATPase, -ATPase, -ATPase, and AchE enzymatic activities. The authors also evaluated if the viability of leukemia cell line (P388) was adversely affected upon adding the crude microbial extracts and found a dose-dependent growth inhibition. These GlossaryTermTTX
-producing bacteria hold promise for the development of effective antitumor compounds.7.3.4 Palytoxin and Analogs
GlossaryTerm
PlTX
s are a group of complex, extremely potent, and marine natural products. GlossaryTermPlTX
is a large (molecular weight: 2681), water-soluble polyalcohol first isolated from zoanthids (genus Palythoa) even though dinoflagellates of the genus Ostreopsis are postulated as the GlossaryTermPlTX
origin [77]. GlossaryTermPlTX
has been found in a variety of marine organisms ranging from dinoflagellates to fish and it is implicated in seafood poisoning with potential danger to public health. The most commonly reported complications of GlossaryTermPlTX
poisoning appears to be rhabdomyolysis, a syndrome injuring skeletal muscle, causing muscle breakdown, and leakage of large quantities of intracellular (myocyte) contents into blood plasma. Other symptoms associated with GlossaryTermPlTX
poisoning in humans are characterized by abdominal cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, paresthesia, bradycardia, renal failure, cyanosis, and respiratory distress [79]. The latter two precede death in fatal cases.Toxicological studies with these compounds show repeatedly low LD values in different mammals, revealing an acute toxic effect on several organs, as demonstrated by different routes of exposure. Acute oral administration in mice induced histological and ultrastructural changes in several organs, such as liver, pancreas, cardiac, and skeletal muscle cells. The recognition of its wide distribution coupled with the poisoning effects that these toxins can have on animals, and especially on humans, have concerned the scientific community [79]. The toxin is known to affect cellular functions by selective binding to the - ATPase and converting the pump into a nonselective channel [195, 271]. The induced ion flux alterations are reported to target pathways involved in cytoskeletal dynamics within different cellular models [77]. - ATPase also functions as a signal transducer to relay messages from the plasma membrane to the intracellular organelles. The toxicological effects of acute oral administration of 42-OH-GlossaryTerm
PlTX
were evaluated in mice, as well as its in vitro delayed hemolytic effects [272]. The compound showed a toxicity profile comparable with that of the parent compound palytoxin (LD and , respectively), both as lethality and acute pathological effects. Also the in vitro hemolytic activity of 42-OH-GlossaryTermPlTX
was similar to that of GlossaryTermPlTX
in agreement with the common mechanism of action on the / pump, to which the two compounds bind with the same affinity.Franchini etal [204] used the Frog Embryo Teratogenesis Assay-Xenopus (GlossaryTerm
FETAX
) to verify the effects of GlossaryTermPlTX
in mortality, delayed growth, and embryo malformation. The toxicological effects of GlossaryTermPlTX
evaluated by GlossaryTermFETAX
assay revealed evident impacts on embryo mortality, teratogenesis and growth. The histological analysis of the surviving young larvae revealed structural changes compared with controls in the nervous and muscle tissue, even if some specimens did not show any significant histopathological modifications. A general reduction in the size of the main inner visceral organs (i. e., intestine, pancreas, and liver) was reported, but no morphological changes. Severe injury to the heart structure was observed in some specimens.GlossaryTerm
PlTX
is a novel skin tumor promoter, which has been used to probe the role of different types of signaling mechanisms in carcinogenesis. The multistage mouse skin model indicates that tumor promotion is an early, prolonged, and reversible phase of carcinogenesis. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor promotion is therefore important for developing strategies to prevent and treat cancer [273]. GlossaryTermPlTX
stimulates a wide range of cellular responses that are likely to play a role in carcinogenesis. Stimulation of arachidonic acid metabolism and the production of prostaglandins modulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor, and modulation of mitogen-activated protein (GlossaryTermMAP
) kinase cascades are the best studied [273]. GlossaryTermMAP
kinases are a family of serine/threonine kinases that relay a variety of signals to the cellular machinery that regulates cell fate and function. This author [274] investigated how palytoxin stimulates GlossaryTermMAP
kinase activity and how GlossaryTermMAP
kinases mediate the response of cells to GlossaryTermPlTX
concluding that GlossaryTermMAP
kinases appear to be important mediators of GlossaryTermPlTX
-stimulated signals. The central role of GlossaryTermMAP
kinases in regulating a variety of critical cellular functions, ranging from enzyme activity to gene expression and ultimately to proliferation and apoptosis, may help explain how palytoxin can stimulate the variety of effects that are characteristic of tumor promoters. Other author suggests that GlossaryTermPlTX
conjugates could be used as prodrugs in cancer chemotheraphy due to its high cytotoxicity in vitro indicating that targeting the prodrug to a tumor, and there releasing the toxin, selective destruction of neoplastic cells could be achieved [275]. Many findings on the involvement of GlossaryTermPlTX
and analogs acting on different cellular targets and modulating the actin cytoskeleton within different cellular models were published [276, 277, 77]. Louzao etal suggest that also cytoskeleton is necessary for GlossaryTermPlTX
activity and that this may find important applications in biomedical research, with particular interest toward the discovery and development of cytotoxic compounds providing novel antitumor therapy [77].7.3.5 Cyclic Imines
GlossaryTerm
CI
s toxins are a very diverse group of marine biotoxins containing an imino functional group as part of its cyclic structure. In many of them, it was found that the toxicity is greatly diminished if imino group is reduced or destroyed [278]. Nowadays, there is no evidence of human poisoning caused by cyclic imines but the toxicity observed in experimental animals requires a deeper study of their activity and distribution [279]. Only the toxicity of spirolides (GlossaryTermSPX
s) and gymnodimines (GlossaryTermGYM
s) has been studied in depth. Spiroimine moiety has been established as the common pharmacophore unit of GlossaryTermCI
s group, although structural change in other parts of the molecules can also affect the toxicity [280]. Primary studies on mechanism of action of GlossaryTermCI
s suggested that it could be related to the interference on transmission of nervous impulses at neuromuscular junction level. It has been demonstrated that GlossaryTermSPX
s and GlossaryTermGYM
s act as potent antagonists of nicotinic (nAChRs) and muscarinic (mAChRs) acetylcholine receptors [281, 282, 283]. Kharrat etal [281] demonstrated that GlossaryTermGYM
A broadly interferes in neuromuscular transmission by directly blocking muscle-type nAChRs. GlossaryTermGYM
A interacts with a wide range of muscular and neuronal types of nAChRs, larger than other well characterized toxins that also act on nicotinic receptors [281]. Bourne etal [282] confirmed the interaction of GlossaryTermSPX
and GlossaryTermGYM
with several muscle and neuronal types of nAChRs by competition binding experiments against labeled α-bungarotoxin and epibatidine. No agonist effect was observed with GlossaryTermSPX
or GlossaryTermGYM
, but both toxins showed a dose-dependent antagonism in muscle- and neuronal-type receptors. The study concluded that GlossaryTermSPX
and GlossaryTermGYM
toxins display high affinity and potent antagonism but limited selectivity for the muscle type versus neuronal subtypes of nAChR [282].GlossaryTerm
SPX
s effects on mAChRs were studied by Wandscheer etal in a human neuronal model. They observed that 13-desmethyl GlossaryTermSPX
C caused a dose- and time-dependent inhibition on neuroblastoma to acetylcholine extracellular stimulation. They demonstrated by competitive binding assays that the 13-desmethyl GlossaryTermSPX
is a competitive antagonist of mAChRs and also causes an internalization of the M3-type muscarinic receptor that might contribute to the inhibitory effect of the toxin on the response to acetylcholine stimulation [283].7.3.6 Maitotoxins and Gambierol
Many bioactive compounds have been isolated from Gambierdiscus spp., i. e., maitotoxins (GlossaryTerm
MTX
s), gambierols, and gambieric acid. GlossaryTermMTX
increases intracellular and is considered one of the most potent marine biotoxins when injected intraperitoneally (ip) in mice, with an LD () of . However, GlossaryTermMTX
has no proven role in human intoxication due to its low capacity for accumulation in fish flesh and low oral potency [46]. At cellular level, GlossaryTermMTX
causes an increase in and by activating -permeable nonselective cation channels, resulting in potent membrane depolarization. This causes, in excitable cells, the opening of voltage-gated and channels. The massive influx of ions could exceed cell buffering mechanisms affecting cell viability [284]. Due to its ability to activate -permeable nonselective cation channels, GlossaryTermMTX
is considered a powerful tool in the study of -dependent mechanisms. Another GlossaryTermMTX
effect is the formation of cytolytic/oncotic pores that finally conduce to cell membrane blebbing and oncotic cell death. For this reason, GlossaryTermMTX
could be a unique tool to explore oncotic/necrotic cell death [284].Gambierol has moderate inhibitory activity against GlossaryTerm
VGSC
s and modified homeostasis. High concentrations of this toxin activate channels in human neuroblastoma cells, and, as a consequence, gambierol induces a cytosolic increment [285]. Cagide etal tested the effect of gambierol on the shape and F-actin cytoskeleton of neuroblastoma. Cells remained with spread morphology and a well-defined actin cytoskeleton, without showing evidence of alterations. Moreover, gambierol was able to produce depolarization, as well as a influx, in neuroblastoma cells and scarcely reduced their metabolism [286]. Alonso etal [287] designed and synthesized truncated skeletal analogs of gambierol with inhibitory activity against voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels. They examined the effect of these compounds in an in vitro model of Alzheimer’s disease obtained from triple transgenic (3Tg-AD) mice, which expresses amyloid beta (Aβ) accumulation and tau hyperphosphorylation. In vitro preincubation of the cells with the compounds resulted in significant inhibition of currents, a reduction in the extra- and intracellular levels of Aβ, and a decrease in the levels of hyperphosphorylated tau, reducing these two cellular pathologies. Thus, these compounds could be useful chemical probes for understanding the function of Kv channels and for elucidating the molecular mechanism of Aβ metabolism modulated by GlossaryTermNMDA
receptors. Moreover, since both Aβ peptides and phosphorylated tau proteins are supposed to interact with GlossaryTermNMDA
receptors and to be implicated in the glutamate enhancement of AD pathology, they could have a potential pharmacological use.Gambieric acids isolated from the culture medium of G. toxicus were described as potent antifungal polyether compounds [46].
Abbreviations
- AFLP:
-
amplified fragment length polymorphism
- AMPA:
-
α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
- ASP:
-
amnesic shellfish poisoning
- ATP:
-
adenosine triphosphate
- AZA:
-
azaspiracid
- AZP:
-
azaspiracid shellfish poisoning
- BTX:
-
brevetoxin
- C-CTX:
-
Caribbean-CTX
- CFP:
-
ciguatera fish poisoning
- CGC:
-
cerebellar granule cell
- CGN:
-
cerebellar granule neuron
- CI:
-
cyclic imine
cyclic imines
- CSP:
-
cell surface protein
- CTX:
-
ciguatoxin
- DA:
-
domoic acid
- DGGE:
-
denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
- DNA:
-
deoxyribonucleic acid
- DSP:
-
diarrhetic shellfish poisoning
- DTX:
-
dinophysis toxin
- ELISA:
-
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- EST:
-
express sequence tag
- EU:
-
European Union
- FDA:
-
Food and Drug Administration
- FETAX:
-
frog embryo teratogenesis assay-xenopus
- FISH:
-
fluorescence in situ hybridization
- GC-TOF-MS:
-
chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry
- GCL:
-
glutamate cysteine ligase
- GLDC:
-
glutamate decarboxylase
- GSH:
-
glutathione
- GYM:
-
gymnodimine
- HAB:
-
harmful algal bloom
- HPLC:
-
high-performance liquid chromatography
- HRP:
-
horseradish peroxidase
- HeLa:
-
human cervix carcinoma cells
- HepG2:
-
hepatoma cell line
- I-CTX:
-
Indian-CTX
- IAC:
-
internal amplification control
- IAEA:
-
International Atomic Energy Agency
- ITS:
-
internal transcribed spacer
- LC-MS:
-
liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
- LC:
-
liquid chromatography
- LDLR:
-
low-density lipoprotein receptor
- LT:
-
lipophilic toxin
- MAP:
-
mitogen-activated protein
- MBA:
-
mouse bioassay
- MCF:
-
Michigan Cancer Foundation-7
- MIP:
-
molecularly imprinted polymer
- MS:
-
mass spectroscopy
- MTX:
-
maitotoxin
- Mbp:
-
million base pairs
- NMDA:
-
N-metyl-d-aspartic acid
- NOAA:
-
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- NO:
-
nitric oxide
- NSP:
-
neurotoxic shellfish poisoning
- OA:
-
okadaic acid
- OTAB:
-
octyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide
- P-CTX:
-
Pacific-CTX
- PCR:
-
polymerase chain reaction
- PET:
-
photoinduced electron transfer
- PPC:
-
proparacaine
- PSP:
-
paralytic shellfish poisoning
- PST:
-
paralytic shellfish poisoning toxin
- PTX2SA:
-
PTX2 seco acid
- PTX:
-
pectenotoxin
- PbTx:
-
brevetoxin
- PlTX:
-
palytoxin
- PnTX:
-
pinnatoxin
- PtTX:
-
pteriatoxin
- RAPD:
-
random amplified polymorphic DNA
- RBA:
-
Receptor Binding Assay
- RFLP:
-
restriction fragment length polymorphism
- RIA:
-
radioimmunoassay
- RNA:
-
ribonucleic acid
- SNP:
-
single nucleotide polymorphisms
- SPR:
-
surface plasmon resonance
- SPX:
-
spirolide
- SSCP:
-
single stranded conformation polymorphism
- SSR:
-
short sequence repeats
- STX:
-
saxitoxin
- TNF:
-
tumor necrosis factor
- TTX:
-
11-[H]-tetrodotoxin
- UV:
-
ultraviolet
- VGIC:
-
voltage-gated ion channels
- VGSC:
-
voltage-gated channel
- YTX:
-
yessotoxin
- cAMP:
-
cyclic adenosine monophosphate
- cDNA:
-
complementary DNA
- epi-DA:
-
epi-domoic acid
- i.p.:
-
intraperitoneal
- iso-DA A–H:
-
isodomoic acids A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H
- mRNA:
-
messenger RNA
- qPCR:
-
quantitative PCR
- rDNA:
-
ribosomal DNA
- rRNA:
-
ribosomal RNA
References
European Parliament: Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of foodstuffs, Off. J. Eur. Union L 139, 55–205 (2004)
M. Andjelkovic: Emerging marine biotoxins – Report from the seminar, Semin. Emerg. Toxins, Vigo-Pontevedra (European Union Reference Labratory for Marine Biotoxins, Vigo Pontevedra Spain 2012)
M. Kat: Dinophysis acuminata blooms in the Dutch coastal area related to diarrhetic mussel poisoning in the Dutch Waddensea, Sarsia 68(1), 81–84 (1983)
M. Kat: Diarrhetic mussel poisoning in the Netherlands related to the dinoflagellate dinophysis acuminata, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. 49(4-5), 417–427 (1983)
T. Yasumoto, Y. Oshima, M. Yamaguchi: Occurrence of a new type of shellfish poisoning in the Tohoku district, Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 44, 1249–1255 (1978)
A. Otero, M.J. Chapela, M. Atanassova, J.M. Vieites, A.G. Cabado: Biological activities and potential applications of marine biotoxins. In: Marine Biomaterials, ed. by S.-K. Kim (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2013)
European Food Safety Authority: Marine biotoxins in shellfish – Domoic acid. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food chain, EFSA Journal 1181, 1–62 (2009)
P. Vale, M.A. Sampayo: Esterification of DSP toxins by Portuguese bivalves from the Northwest coast determined by LC-MS – A widespread phenomenon, Toxicon 40(1), 33–42 (2002)
P. Cohen: The structure and regulation of protein phosphatases, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58, 453–508 (1989)
T.A. Haystead, A.T.R. Sim, D. Carling, R.C. Honnor, Y. Tsukitani, P. Cohen, D.G. Hardie: Effects of the tumor promoter okadaic acid on intracellular protein phosphorylation and metabolism, Nature 337, 78–81 (1989)
T. Yasumoto, M. Murata, Y. Oshima, M. Sano, G.K. Matsumoto, J. Clardy: Diarrhetic shellfish toxins, Tetrahedron 41(6), 1019–1025 (1985)
J. Blanco, G. Alvarez, E. Uribe: Identification of pectenotoxins in plankton, filter feeders, and isolated cells of a Dinophysis acuminata with an atypical toxin profile, from Chile, Toxicon 49(5), 710–716 (2007)
B. Paz, A.H. Daranas, M. Norte, P. Riobo, J.M. Franco, J.J. Fernandez: Yessotoxins, a group of marine polyether toxins: An overview, Mar. Drugs 6(2), 73–102 (2008)
M. Murata, M. Kumagai, J.S. Lee, T. Yasumoto: Isolation and structure of yessotoxin, a novel polyether compound implicated in diarrhetic shellfish poisoning, Tetrahedron Lett. 28, 5869–5872 (1987)
K.J. Lee, J.S. Mok, K.C. Song, H. Yu, J.H. Jung, J.H. Kim: Geographical and annual variation in lipophilic shellfish toxins from oysters and mussels along the South coast of Korea, J. Food Prot. 74(12), 2127–2133 (2011)
G. Alvarez, E. Uribe, R. Diaz, M. Braun, C. Marino, J. Blanco: Bloom of the Yessotoxin producing dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum (Dinophyceae) in Northern Chile, J. Sea Res. 65(4), 427–434 (2011)
T. Yasumoto, A. Takizawa: Fluorometric measurement of yessotoxins in shellfish by high-pressure liquid chromatography, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61(10), 1775–1777 (1997)
C.O. Miles, A.L. Wilkins, A.D. Hawkes, A.I. Selwood, D.J. Jensen, R. Munday, J.M. Cooney, V. Beuzenberg: Polyhydroxylated amide analogs of yessotoxin from Protoceratium reticulatum, Toxicon 45(1), 61–71 (2005)
H. Ogino, M. Kumagai, T. Yasumoto: Toxicological evaluation of yessotoxin, Nat. Toxins 5, 255–259 (1997)
L.A. De la Rosa, A. Alfonso, N. Vilariño, M.R. Vieytes, L.M. Botana: Modulation of cytosolic calcium levels of human lymphocytes by yessotoxin, a novel marine phycotoxin, Biochem. Pharmacol. 61(7), 827–833 (2001)
M.J. Twiner, R. El-Ladki, J. Kilcoyne, G.J. Doucette: Comparative effects of marine algal toxins azaspiracid-1,-2, and-3 on T. Jurkat lymphocyte cells, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 25, 747–754 (2012)
G. Alvarez, E. Uribe, P. Avalos, C. Marino, J. Blanco: First identification of azaspiracid and spirolides in Mesodesma donacium and Mulinia edulis from Northern Chile, Toxicon 55(2/3), 638–641 (2010)
A. López-Rivera, K. O'Callaghan, M. Moriarty, D. O'Driscoll, B. Hamilton, M. Lehane, K.J. James, A. Furey: First evidence of azaspiracids (AZAs): A family of lipophilic polyether marine toxins in scallops (Argopecten purpuratus) and mussels (Mytilus chilensis) collected in two regions of Chile, Toxicon 55(4), 692–701 (2009)
H. Taleb, P. Vale, R. Amanhir, A. Benhadouch, R. Sagou, A. Chafik: First detection of azaspiracids in mussels in North West Africa, J. Shelfish Res. 25, 1067–1070 (2006)
M.J. Twiner, N. Rehmann, P. Hess, G.J. Doucette: Azaspiracid shellfish poisoning: A review on the chemistry, ecology, and toxicology with an emphasis on human health impacts, Mar. Drugs 6(2), 39–72 (2008)
R. Ueoka, A. Ito, M. Izumikawa, S. Maeda, M. Takagi, K. Shin-ya, M. Yoshida, R.W.M. van Soest, S. Matsunaga: Isolation of Azaspiracid-2 from a marine sponge Echinoclathria sp., as a potent cytotoxin, Toxicon 53(6), 680–684 (2009)
K.J. James, C. Moroney, C. Roden, M. Satake, T. Yasumoto, M. Lehane, A. Furey: Ubiquitous 'benign' alga emerges as the cause of shellfish contamination responsible for the human toxic syndrome, azaspiracid poisoning, Toxicon 41, 145–151 (2003)
K. Toebe, A.R. Joshi, P. Messtorff, U. Tillmann, A. Cembella, U. John: Molecular discrimination of taxa within the dinoflagellate genus Azadinium, the source of azaspiracid toxins, J. Plankton Res. 35(1), 225–230 (2013)
European Food Safety Authority: Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the European commission on marine biotoxins in shellfish – Azaspiracids, Eur. Food Saf. Auth. J. 723, 1–52 (2008)
European Food Safety Authority: Marine biotoxins in shellfish – Saxitoxin group, Eur. Food Saf. Auth. J. 1019, 1–46 (2009)
L. McCauley, D.L. Erdner, S. Nagai, M. Richlen, D.M. Anderson: Biogeographic analysis of the globally distributed harmful algal bloom species Alexandrium minutum (Dinophyceae) based on rRNA gene sequences and microsatellite markers, J. Phycol. 45, 454–463 (2009)
WHOI (Ed.): Harmful algae (2007), http://www.whoi.edu/redtide/page.do?pid=18103 (accessed January 31, 2012)
S.M. Etheridge: Paralytic shellfish poisoning: Seafood safety and human health perspectives, Toxicon 56, 108–122 (2010)
K.A. Lefebvre, A. Robertson: Domoic acid and human exposure risks: A review, Toxicon 56(2), 218–230 (2010)
Y. He, A. Fekete, G. Chen, M. Harir, L. Zhang, P. Tong, P. Schmitt-Kopplin: Analytical approaches for an important shellfish poisoning agent: Domoic Acid, J. Agric. Food Chem. 58(22), 11525–11533 (2010)
O.M. Pulido: Domoic acid toxicologic pathology: A review, Mar. Drugs 6(2), 180–219 (2008)
J.S. Ramsdell: The molecular and integrative basis to domoic acid toxicity. In: Phycotoxins Chemistry and Biochemistry, ed. by L.M. Botana (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2007) pp. 223–250
Y. Kotaki: Ecobiology of amnesic shellfish toxin producing diatoms. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins, Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.M. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 383–396
J.L.C. Wright, K. Boyd, A.S.W. de Freitas, M. Falk, R. Foxall, W.D. Jamieson, A.W. Laycock, A.W. McCulloch, A.G. McInnes, P. Odense, V.P. Pathak, M.A. Quilliam, M.A. Ragan, P.G. Sim, J.A. Thibault, J.A. Walter, M. Gilgan, D.J.A. Richard, D. Dewar: Identification of domoic acid, a neuroexcitatory amino acid, in toxic mussels from eastern Prince Edward Island, Can. J. Chem. 67, 481–490 (1989)
M.A. Quilliam, P.G. Sim, A.W. McCulloch, A.G. McInnes: High-performance liquidchromatography of domoic acid, a marine neurotoxin, with application to shellfish and plankton, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 36(3), 139–154 (1989)
Y. Djaoued, M. Thibodeau, J. Robichaud, S. Balaji, S. Priya, N. Tchoukanova, S.S. Bates: Photocatalytic degradation of domoic acid using nanocrystalline TiO${}_{2}$ thin films, J. Photochem. Photobiol. 193, 271–283 (2008)
J.L.C. Wright, M. Falk, A.G. McInnes, J.A. Walter: Identification of isodomoic acid-d and two new geometrical-isomers of domoic acid in toxic mussels, Can. J. Chem. 68(1), 22–25 (1990)
J.L.C. Wright, M.A. Quilliam: Methods for domoic acid, the amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP) toxin. In: Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae, ed. by G.M. Hallegraeff, D. Anderson, A.D. Cembella (UNESCO, Paris 1995) pp. 115–135
M. Quilliam: Chemical methods for lipophillic shellfish toxins. In: Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae, ed. by G. Hallegraeff, D.M. Anderson, A.D. Cembella (UNESCO, Paris 2003) pp. 211–245
European Food Safety Authority: Scientific Opinion on marine biotoxins in shellfish – Emerging toxins: Ciguatoxin group, Eur. Food Saf. Auth. J. 8(6), 1627–1638 (2010)
A. Caillaud, P. de la Iglesia, H.T. Darius, S. Pauillac, K. Aligizaki, S. Fraga, M. Chinain, J. Diogene: Update on methodologies available for ciguatoxin determination: Perspectives to confront the onset of ciguatera fish poisoning in Europe, Mar. Drugs 8(6), 1838–1907 (2010)
G.K. Isbister, M.C. Kiernan: Neurotoxic marine poisoning, Lancet Neurol. 4(4), 219–228 (2005)
R.W. Litaker, M.W. Vandersea, M.A. Faust, S.R. Kibler, M. Chinain, M.J. Holmes, W.C. Holland, P.A. Tester: Taxonomy of Gambierdiscus including four new species, Gambierdiscus caribaeus, Gambierdiscus carolinianus, Gambierdiscus carpenteri and Gambierdiscus ruetzleri (Gonyaulacales, Dinophyceae), Phycologia 48(5), 344–390 (2009)
R.W. Litaker, M.W. Vandersea, M.A. Faust, S.R. Kibler, A.W. Naua, W.C. Holland, M. Chinain, M.J. Holmes, P.A. Tester: Global distribution of ciguatera causing dinoflagellates in the genus Gambierdiscus, Toxicon 56, 711–730 (2010)
K. Aligizaki, G. Nikolaidis: Morphological identification of two tropical dinoflagellates of the genera Gambierdiscus and Sinophysis in the Mediterranean Sea, J. Biol. Res.-Thessalon. 9, 75–82 (2008)
J.P. Vernoux, R.J. Lewis: Isolation and characterisation of Caribbean ciguatoxins from the horse-eye jack (Caranx latus), Toxicon 35, 889–900 (1997)
I. Pottier, J. Vernoux, A. Jones, R. Lewis: Analysis of toxin profiles in three different fish species causing ciguatera fish poisoning in Guadeloupe, French West Indies, Food Addit. Contam. 19, 1034–1042 (2002)
B. Hamilton, M. Hurbungs, J.P. Vernoux, A. Jones, R.J. Lewis: Isolation and characterization of Indian Ocean ciguatoxin, Toxicon 40, 685–693 (2002)
C.C. Davis: Gymnodinium Brevis Sp. Nov. A cause of discolored water and animal mortality in the gulf of Mexico, Bot. Gaz. 109(3), 358–360 (2002)
European Food Safety Authority: Panel on contaminants in the food chain (CONTAM), Scientific opinion on marine biotoxins in shellfish – emerging toxins: Brevetoxin group, Eur. Food Saf. Auth. J. 8(7), 1–29 (2010)
G. Gunter, F.G.W. Smith, R.H. Williams: Mass mortality of marine animals on the lower west coast of Florida, November 1946–January 1947, Science 105(2723), 256–257 (1947)
FAO (Ed.): Marine biotoxins. In: Food and Nutrition Paper, Vol. 80, Available from http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5486e/y5486e00.HTM (2004)
L.E. Fleming, B. Kirkpatrick, L.C. Backer, C.J. Walsh, K. Nierenberg, J. Clark, A. Reich, J. Hollenbeck, J. Benson, Y.S. Cheng, J. Naar, R. Pierce, A.J. Bourdelais, W.M. Abraham, G. Kirkpatrick, J. Zaias, A. Wanner, E. Mendes, S. Shalat, P. Hoagland, W. Stephan, J.A. Bean, S. Watkins, T. Clarke, M. Byrne, D.G. Baden: Review of Florida red tide and human health effects, Harmful Algae 10, 224–233 (2011)
F. Van Dolah: Marine algal toxins: Origins, health effects, and their increased occurrence, Environ. Health Perspect. 108(Suppl. 1), 133–141 (2000)
D.G. Baden, A.J. Bourdelais, H. Jacocks, S. Michelliza, J. Naar: Natural and derivative brevetoxins: Historical background, multiplicity, and effects, Environ. Health Perspect. 113(5), 621–625 (2005)
J.H. Landsberg: The effects of harmful algal blooms on aquatic organisms, Rev. Fish. Sci. 10(2), 113–390 (2002)
S.M. Plakas, R.W. Dickey: Advances in monitoring and toxicity assessment of brevetoxins in molluscan shellfish, Toxicon 56(2), 137–149 (2010)
J.S. Ramsdell: The molecular and integrative basis to brevetoxin toxicity. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins: Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.M. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 519–550
B.L. Williams: Behavioral and chemical ecology of marine organisms with respect to tetrodotoxin, Mar. Drugs 8(3), 381–398 (2010)
B.D. Gessner, B. McLaughlin: Epidemiologic impact of toxic episodes: Neurotoxic toxins. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins. Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.M. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 77–103
Y. Bentur, J. Ashkar, Y. Lurie, Y. Levy, Z. Azzam, M. Litmanovich: Lessepsian migration and tetrodotoxin poisoning due to Lagocephalus sceleratus in the eastern Mediterranean, Toxicon 52, 964–968 (2008)
P. Rodriguez, A. Alfonso, C. Vale, C. Alfonso, P. Vale, A. Tellez, L.M. Botana: First toxicity report of tetrodotoxin and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX in the trumpet shell Charonia lampas lampas in Europe, Anal. Chem. 80, 5622–5629 (2008)
R. Chau, J.A. Kalaitzis, B.A. Neilan: On the origins and biosynthesis of tetrodotoxin, Aquat. Toxicol. 104(1/2), 61–72 (2011)
C.H. Lee, P.C. Ruben: Interaction between voltage-gated sodium channels and the neurotoxin, tetrodotoxin, Channels 2, 407–412 (2008)
C.B. Berde, U. Athiraman, B. Yahalom, D. Zurakowski, G. Corfas, C. Bognet: Tetrodotoxin-bupivacaine-epinephrine combinations for prolonged local anesthesia, Mar. Drugs 9(12), 2717–2728 (2011)
R.E. Moore, P.J. Scheuer: Palytoxin – New marine toxin from a coelenterate, Science 172(3982), 495 (1971)
J.R. Deeds, M.D. Schwartz: Human risk associated with palytoxin exposure, Toxicon 56(2), 150–162 (2010)
European Food Safety Authority: Panel on contaminants in the food chain (CONTAM); Scientific opinion on marine biotoxins in shellfish – Palytoxin group, Eur. Food Saf. Auth. J. 7(12), 1393–1340 (2009)
P. Ciminiello, C. Dell'Aversano, E. Dello Iacovo, E. Fattorusso, M. Forino, L. Grauso, L. Tartaglione, C. Florio, P. Lorenzon, M. De Bortoli, A. Tubaro, M. Poli, G. Bignami: Stereostructure and biological activity of 42-hydroxy-palytoxin: A new palytoxin analogue from hawaiian Palythoa subspecies, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 22(11), 1851–1859 (2009)
P. Riobo, J.M. Franco: Palytoxins: Biological and chemical determination, Toxicon 57(3), 368–375 (2011)
D.W. Hilgemann: From a pump to a pore: How palytoxin opens the gates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(2), 386–388 (2003)
M.C. Louzao, I.R. Ares, E. Cagide, B. Espina, N. Vilarino, A. Alfonso, M.R. Vieytes, L.M. Botana: Palytoxins and cytoskeleton: An overview, Toxicon 57(3), 460–469 (2011)
A.M. Rodrigues, A.C.G. Almeida, A.F.C. Infantosi: Infantosi: Effect of palytoxin on the sodium-potassium pump: Model and simulation, Phys. Biol. 5(3), 036005 (2008)
V. Ramos, V. Vasconcelos: Palytoxin and analogs: Biological and ecological effects, Mar. Drugs 8(7), 2021–2037 (2010)
B. Krock, U. Tillmann, U. John, A.D. Cembella: Characterization of azaspiracids in plankton size-fractions and isolation of an azaspiracid-producing dinoflagellate from the North Sea, Harmful Algae 8(2), 254–263 (2009)
A. Otero, M.J. Chapela, M. Atanassova, J.M. Vieites, A.G. Cabado: Ciclyc imines chemistry and mechanism of action: A review, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 24(11), 1817–1829 (2011)
A. Cembella, B. Krock: Cyclic imine toxins: Chemistry, biogeography, biosynthesis and pharmacology. In: Seafood and Freshwaters Toxins: Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.A. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 561–580
T.M. Hu, J.M. Curtis, Y. Oshima, M.A. Quilliam, J.A. Walter, W.M. Watsonwright, J.L.C. Wright: Spirolide-B and Spirolide-D, two novel macrocycles isolated from the digestive glands of shellfish, J. Chem. Soc.-Chem. Commun. 20, 2159–2161 (1995)
T. Seki, M. Satake, L. Mackenzie, H.F. Kaspar, T. Yasumoto: Gymnodimine, a new marine toxin of unprecedented structure isolated from New Zealand oysters and the dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium sp., Tetrahedron Lett. 36(39), 7093–7096 (1995)
S.Z. Zheng, F.L. Huang, S.C. Chen, X.F. Tan, J.B. Zuo, J. Peng, R.W. Xie: The isolation and bioactivities of pinnatoxin, Chin. J. Mar. Drugs 33(9), 33–35 (1990), in Chinese
N. Takada, N. Umemura, K. Suenaga, D. Uemura: Structural determination of pteriatoxins A, B and C, extremely potent toxins from the bivalve Pteria penguin, Tetrahedron Lett. 42(20), 3495–3497 (2001)
K. Torigoe, M. Murata, T. Yasumoto: Prorocentrolide, a toxic nitrogenous macrocycle from a marine dinoflagellate, Prorocentrum lima, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 7876–7877 (1988)
T.M. Hu, A.S.W. de Freitas, J.M. Curtis, Y. Oshima, J.A. Walter, J.L.C. Wright: Isolation and structure of prorocentrolide B, a fast-acting toxin from Prorocentrum maculosum, J. Nat. Prod. 59(11), 1010–1014 (1996)
C.-K. Lu, G.-H. Lee, R. Huang, H.-N. Chou: Spiro-prorocentrimine, a novel macrocyclic lactone from a benthic Prorocentrum sp. of Taiwan, Tetrahedron Lett. 42(9), 1713–1716 (2001)
Y. Kishi: Complete structure of maitotoxin, Pure Appl. Chem. 70(2), 339–344 (1999)
M. Murata, H. Naoki, S. Matsunaga, M. Satake, T. Yasumoto: Structure and partial stereochemical assignments for maitotoxin, the most toxic and largest natural non-biopolymer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116(16), 7098–7107 (1994)
M. Sasaki, N. Matsumori, T. Maruyama, T. Nonomura, M. Murata, K. Tachibana, T. Yasumoto: The complete structure of maitotoxin, Part I: Configuration of the C1-C14 side Chain, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 35(15), 1672–1675 (1996)
M. Estacion, W.P. Schilling: Maitotoxin-induced membrane blebbing and cell death in bovine aortic endothelial cells, BMC Physiology 1, 2–12 (2001)
K.K.W. Wang, R. Nath, K.J. Raser, I. Hajimohammadreza: Maitotoxin induces calpain activation in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells and cerebrocortical cultures, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 331(2), 208–214 (1996)
M. Carrera, E. Garet, A. Barreiro, E. Garcés, D. Pérez, C. Guisande, A. González-Fernández: Generation of monoclonal antibodies for the specific immunodetection of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum Halim from Spanish waters, Harmful Algae 9, 272–280 (2010)
A. González-Fernández, E. Garet Fonández, H. Kleivdal, C. Elliot, K. Campbell: Immunological methods for detection of toxic algae and phycotoxins: Immunofluorescence, ELISAS and other innovative techniques. In: New Trends in Marine and Freshwater Toxins: Food Safety Concerns, ed. by A.G. Cabado, J.M. Vieites (NovaScience, New York 2012) pp. 267–303, Chapter 9
L. Campbell, R.J. Olson, H.M. Sosik, A. Abraham, D.W. Henrichs, C.J. Hyatt, E.J. Buskey: First harmful Dinophysis (Dinophyceae, Dinophysiales) bloom in the US is revealed by automated imaging flow cytometry, J. Phycol. 46, 66–75 (2010)
European Commission: Commission Regulation (EC): No 1244/2007 of 24 October 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 2074/2005 as regards implementing measures for centain products of animal origin intended for human consumption and laying down specific rules on official controls for the inspection of meat, Off. J. Eur. Union L 281, 12–18 (2007)
Y. Zhou, Y.-S. Li, F.-G. Pan, Y.-Y. Zhang, S.-Y. Lu, H.-L. Ren, Z.-H. Li, Z.-S. Liu, J.-H. Zhang: Development of a new monoclonal antibody based direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of brevetoxins in food samples, Food Chem. 118(2), 467–471 (2010)
T. Tsumuraya, K. Takeuchi, S. Yamashita, I. Fujii, M. Hirama: Development of a monoclonal antibody against the left wing of ciguatoxin CTX1B: Thiol strategy and detection using a sandwich ELISA, Toxicon 60(3), 348–357 (2012)
T.I. Tsumuraya, I. Fujii, M. Hirama: Production of monoclonal antibodies for sandwich immunoassay detection of Pacific ciguatoxins, Toxicon 56(5), 797–803 (2010)
A. Sassolas, G. Catanante, A. Hayat, L.D. Stewart, C.T. Elliott, J.L. Marty: Improvement of the efficiency and simplification of ELISA tests for rapid and ultrasensitive detection of okadaic acid in shellfish, Food Control. 30(1), 144–149 (2013)
A. Sassolas, A. Hayat, G. Catanante, J.-L. Marty: Detection of the marine toxin okadaic acid: Assessing seafood safety, Talanta 105, 306–316 (2013)
M.M. Vdovenko, C. Hung, I.Y. Sakharov, F.-Y. Yu: Determination of okadaic acid in shellfish by using a novel chemiluminescent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, Talanta 116, 343–346 (2013)
E. Garet, A.G. Cabado, J.M. Vieites, Á. González-Fernández: Rapid isolation of single-chain antibodies by phage display technology directed against one of the most potent marine toxins: Palytoxin, Toxicon 55(8), 1519–1526 (2010)
E. Garet, A. González-Fernández, J. Lago, J.M. Vieites, A.G. Cabado: Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunoassay and reference methods for the detection of shellfish hydrophilic toxins in several presentations of seafood, Toxicon 58, 1410–1415 (2010)
M. Dechraoui Bottein, J. Maucher Fuquay, R. Munday, A.I. Selwood, R. van Ginkel, C.O. Miles, J.I. Loader, A.L. Wilkins, J.S. Ramsdell: Bioassays methods for detection of N-palmitoylbrevetoxin-B2 (BTX-B4), Toxicon 55, 497–506 (2010)
J. Homola, E. Brynda, P. Tobiska, I. Tichy, J. Skvor: Optical biosensors using surface plasmon resonance, Proc. SPIE Photonics Devices Syst. 401, 6130–6135 (1999)
J. Abery: SPR technology increases efficiency for discovery and development, Biopharm. Int. 1 (2001)
R.C. Stevens, S.D. Soelberg, B.-T.L. Eberhart, S. Spencer, J.C. Wekell, T.M. Chinowsky, V.L. Trainer, C.E. Furlong: Detection of the toxin domoic acid from clam extracts using a portable surface plasmon resonance biosensor, Harmful Algae 6(2), 166–174 (2007)
E.S. Fonfría, N. Vilariño, K. Campbell, C. Elliott, S.A. Haughey, B. Ben-Gigirey, J.M. Vieites, K. Kawatsu, L.M. Botana: Paralytic shellfish poisoning detection by surface plasmon resonance-based biosensors in shellfish matrixes, Anal. Chem. 79(16), 6303–6311 (2007)
A.D. Taylor, J. Ladd, S. Etheridge, J. Deeds, S. Hall, S. Jiang: Quantitative detection of tetrodotoxin (TTX) by a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor, Sens. Actuators B 130(1), 120–128 (2008)
B.J. Yakes, S. Prezioso, S.A. Haughey, K. Campbell, C.T. Elliott, S.L. DeGrasse: An improved immunoassay for detection of saxitoxin by surface plasmon resonance biosensors, Sens. Actuators B 156(2), 805–811 (2011)
K. Campbell, A.C. Huet, C. Charlier, C. Higgins, P. Delahaut, C.T. Elliott: Comparison of ELISA and SPR biosensor technology for the detection of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins, J. Chromatogr. B 877(32), 4079–4089 (2009)
K. Metfies, S. Huljic, M. Lange, L.K. Medlin: Electrochemical detection of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii with a DNA-biosensor, Biosens. Bioelectron. 20(7), 1349–1357 (2005)
A. Hayat, L. Barthelmebs, J.-L. Marty: Enzyme-linked immunosensor based on super paramagnetic nanobeads for easy and rapid detection of okadaic acid, Anal. Chim. Acta 690(2), 248–252 (2011)
R.B. Dominguez, A. Hayat, A. Sassolas, G.A. Alonso, R. Munoz, J.-L. Marty: Automated flow-through amperometric immunosensor for highly sensitive and on-line detection of okadaic acid in mussel sample, Talanta 99, 232–237 (2012)
A. Hayat, L. Barthelmebs, A. Sassolas, J.-L. Marty: Development of a novel label-free amperometric immunosensor for the detection of okadaic acid, Anal. Chim. Acta 724, 92–97 (2012)
T. Ikehara, S. Imamura, A. Yoshino, T. Yasumoto: PP2A inhibition assay using recombinant enzyme for rapid detection of okadaic acid and its analogs in shellfish, Toxins 2(1), 195–204 (2010)
D.O. Mountfort, T. Suzuki, P. Truman: Protein phosphatase inhibition assay adapted for determination of total DSP in contaminated mussels, Toxicon 39(2/3), 383–390 (2001)
G. Volpe, E. Cotroneo, D. Moscone, L. Croci, L. Cozzi, G. Ciccaglioni, G. Palleschi: A bienzyme electrochemical probe for flow injection analysis of okadaic acid based on protein phosphatase-2A inhibition: An optimization study, Anal. Biochem. 385(1), 50–56 (2009)
H. Smienk, E. Dominguez, A. Otero, A.G. Cabado, J. Vieites: Quantitive determination of okadatic acid toxins group by a colorimetric phosphatase inhibition assay: Collaborative study, J. AOAC Int. 96(1), 77–85 (2013)
European Council: (EC) CR (2005) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2074/2005 of 5 December 2005 laying down implementing measures for certain products under Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and for the organisation of official controls under Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, derogating from Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Regulations (EC) No 853/2004 and (EC) No 854/2004, Off. J. Eur. Union L 338, 27–59 (2005)
European Commission: Commision Regulation (EU): No 15/2011 of 10 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 2074/2005 as regards testing methods for detecting marine biotoxins in live bivalve molluscs., vol. 11.1.2011, Off. J. Eur. Union 6, 3–6 (2011)
X. Zhang, Z. Zhang: Capillary electrophoresis-based immunoassay with electrochemical detection as rapid method for determination of saxitoxin and decarbamoylsaxitoxin in shellfish samples, J. Food Compos. Anal. 28(1), 61–68 (2012)
F. Fournel, E. Baco, M. Mamani-Matsuda, M. Degueil, B. Bennetau, D. Moynet, D. Mossalayi, L. Vellutini, J.P. Pillot, C. Dejous, D. Rebière: Love wave biosensor for real-time detection of okadaic acid as DSP phycotoxin, Sens. Actuators B 170, 122–128 (2012)
M.R. Vieytes, A.G. Cabado, A. Alfonso, C. Louzao, A. Botana, L. Botana: Solid-phase radioreceptor assay for paralytic shellfish toxins, Anal. Biochem. 211, 87–93 (1993)
G.J. Doucette, M.M. Logan, J.S. Ramsdell, F.M. Van Dolah: Development and preliminary validation of a microtiter plate-based receptor binding assay for paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins, Toxicon 35(5), 625–636 (1997)
G. Usup, C.P. Leaw, M.-Y. Cheah, A. Ahmad, B.K. Ng: Analysis of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxin congeners by a sodium channel receptor binding assay, Toxicon 44(1), 37–43 (2004)
G.J. Doucette, C.L. Powell, E.U. Do, C.Y. Byon, F. Cleves, S.G. McClain: Evaluation of 11-[3H]-tetrodotoxin use in a heterologous receptor binding assay for PSP toxins, Toxicon 38(11), 1465–1474 (2000)
C.L. Powell, G.J. Doucette: A receptor binding assay for paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins: Recent advances and applications, Nat. Toxins 7(6), 393–400 (1999)
B.A. Suárez-Isla: Paralytic shellfish toxins -pharmacology, and toxicology biological detection methods. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins, Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.A. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 197–205
F.M. Van Dolah, S.E. Fuego, T.A. Leighfield, C.M. Mikulsk, G.J. Doucette: Determination of paralytic shellfish toxins in shellfish by receptor binding assay: Collaborative study, J. AOAC Int. 95(3), 795–812 (2012)
V.L. Trainer, D.G. Baden, W.A. Catterall: Detection of marine toxins using recontituted sodium channels, J. AOAC Int. 78, 570–573 (1995)
R.A. Edwards, A.M. Stuart, D.G. Baden: Brevetoxin binding in three phylogenetically diverse vertebrates, Toxic Marine Phytoplankton, 4th Int. Conf., Lund, Swedan, ed. by E. Graneli (Elsevier, New York 1990), Illus. Maps 290–293
V.L. Trainer, D.G. Baden: High affinity binding of red tide neurotoxins to marine mammal brain, Aquat. Toxicol. 46, 139–148 (1999)
M.L.J. Twiner, M.-Y. Bottein Dechraoui, Z. Wang, C.M. Mikulski, M.S. Henry, R.H. Pierce, G.J. Doucette: Extraction and analysis of lipophilic brevetoxins from the red tide dinoflagellate Karenia brevis, Anal. Biochem. 369(1), 128–135 (2007)
M. Chinain, H. Darius, A. Ung, M. Fouc, T. Revel, P. Cruchet, S. Pauillac, D. Laurent: Ciguatera risk management in French Polynesia: The case study of Raivavae Island (Australes Archipelago), Toxicon 56(5), 674–690 (2010)
H.T. Darius, D. Ponton, T. Revel, P. Cruchet, A. Ung, M.T. Fouc, M. Chinain: Ciguatera risk assessment in two toxic sites of French Polynesia using the receptor-binding assay, Toxicon 50, 612–626 (2007)
F.M. Van Dolah, T.A. Leighfield, B.L. Haynes, D.R. Hampson, J.S. Ramsdell: A microplate receptor assay for the amnesic shellfish poisoning toxin, domoic acid, utilizing a cloned glutamate receptor, Anal. Biochem. 245(1), 102–105 (1997)
K.A. Baugh, S. Spencer, J.C. Wekell, V.L. Trainer, K.A. Steidinger, J.H. Landsberg, C.R. Tomas, G.A. Vargo: An alternative method for domoic acid determination in seawater particulates: A receptor binding assay using glutamate dehydrogenase. In: Harmful Algae 2002. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, (Florida Institute of Oceanography, and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Paris 2004)
T. Yasumoto: Search for ciguatoxin producing clones of Gambierdiscus toxicus on Okinawan coastal reef, Ciguatera and Related Biotoxins Workshop, New Caledoria, France, 2000 (Elsevier, Paris 2008)
D.M. Anderson, A.D. Cembella, G.M. Hallegraeff: Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: Paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 143–176 (2012)
A. Penna, C. Battocchi, E. Garcés, S. Anglès, E. Cucchiari, C. Totti, A. Kremp, C. Satta, M. Grazia Giacobbe, I. Bravo: Detection of microalgal resting cysts in European coastal sediments using a PCR-based assay, Deep Sea Res. Part II 57(3), 288–300 (2010)
L. Galluzzi, A. Cegna, S. Casabianca, A. Penna, N. Saunders, M. Magnani: Development of an oligonucleotide microarray for the detection and monitoring of marine dinoflagellates, J. Microbiol. Methods 84(2), 234–242 (2011)
M.W. Vandersea, S.R. Kibler, W.C. Holland, P.A. Tester, T.F. Schultz, M.A. Faust, M.J. Holmes, M. Chinain, R.W. Litaker: Development of semi-quantitative PCR assays for the detection and enumeration of Gambierdiscus species (Gonyaulacales, Dinophyceae), J. Phycol. 48(4), 902–915 (2011)
T. Nishimura, S. Sato, W. Tawong, H. Sakanari, K. Uehara, M.M.R. Shah, S. Suda, T. Yasumoto, Y. Taira, H. Yamaguchi: Genetic diversity and distribution of the ciguatera-causing dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus spp. (Dinophyceae) in coastal areas of Japan, PLoS ONE 8(4), e60882 (2013)
T.A. Rynearson, B. Palenik: Learning to read the oceans: Genomics of marine phytoplankton, Adv. Mar. Biol. 60, 1–39 (2011)
B. Palenik, J. Grimwood, A. Aerts, P. Rouze, A. Salamov, N. Putnam, C. Dupont, R. Jorgensen, E. Derelle, S. Rombauts, K. Zhou, R. Otillar, S.S. Merchant, S. Podell, T. Gaasterland, C. Napoli, K. Gendler, A. Manuell, V. Tai, O. Vallon, G. Piganeau, S. Jancek, M. Heijde, K. Jabbari, C. Bowler, M. Lohr, S. Robbens, G. Werner, I. Dubchak, G.J. Pazour, Q. Ren, I. Paulsen, C. Delwiche, J. Schmutz, D. Rokhsar, Y. Van de Peer, H. Moreau, I.V. Grigoriev: The tiny eukaryote Ostreococcus provides genomic insights into the paradox of plankton speciation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(18), 7705–7710 (2007)
C.J. Gobler, D.L. Berry, S.T. Dyhrman, S.W. Wilhelm, A. Salamov, A.V. Lobanov, Y. Zhang, J.L. Collier, L.L. Wurch, A.B. Kustka, B.D. Dill, M. Shah, N.C. VerBerkmoes, A. Kuo, A. Terry, J. Pangilinan, E.A. Lindquist, S. Lucas, I.T. Paulsen, T.K. Hattenrath-Lehmann, S.C. Talmage, E.A. Walker, F. Koch, A.M. Burson, M.A. Marcoval, Y.-Z. Tang, G.R. LeCleir, K.J. Coyne, G.M. Berg, E.M. Bertrand, M.A. Saito, V.N. Gladyshev, I.V. Grigoriev: Niche of harmful alga Aureococcus anophagefferens revealed through ecogenomics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(11), 4352–4357 (2011)
E.V. Armbrust, J.A. Berges, C. Bowler, B.R. Green, D. Martinez, N.H. Putnam, S.G. Zhou, A.E. Allen, K.E. Apt, M. Bechner, M.A. Brzezinski, B.K. Chaal, A. Chiovitti, A.K. Davis, M.S. Demarest, J.C. Detter, T. Glavina, D. Goodstein, M.Z. Hadi, U. Hellsten, M. Hildebrand, B.D. Jenkins, J. Jurka, V.V. Kapitonov, N. Kroger, W.W.Y. Lau, T.W. Lane, F.W. Larimer, J.C. Lippmeier, S. Lucas, M. Medina, A. Montsant, M. Obornik, M.S. Parker, B. Palenik, G.J. Pazour, P.M. Richardson, T.A. Rynearson, M.A. Saito, D.C. Schwartz, K. Thamatrakoln, K. Valentin, A. Vardi, F.P. Wilkerson, D.S. Rokhsar: The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: Ecology, evolution, and metabolism, Science 306(5693), 79–86 (2004)
A.Z. Worden, J.-H. Lee, T. Mock, P. Rouze, M.P. Simmons, A.L. Aerts, A.E. Allen, M.L. Cuvelier, E. Derelle, M.V. Everett, E. Foulon, J. Grimwood, H. Gundlach, B. Henrissat, C. Napoli, S.M. McDonald, M.S. Parker, S. Rombauts, A. Salamov, P. Von Dassow, J.H. Badger, P.M. Coutinho, E. Demir, I. Dubchak, C. Gentemann, W. Eikrem, J.E. Gready, U. John, W. Lanier, E.A. Lindquist, S. Lucas, K.F.X. Mayer, H. Moreau, F. Not, R. Otillar, O. Panaud, J. Pangilinan, I. Paulsen, B. Piegu, A. Poliakov, S. Robbens, J. Schmutz, E. Toulza, T. Wyss, A. Zelensky, K. Zhou, E.V. Armbrust, D. Bhattacharya, U.W. Goodenough, Y. Van de Peer, I.V. Grigoriev: Green evolution and dynamic adaptations revealed by genomes of the marine picoeukaryotes micromonas, Science 324(5924), 268–272 (2009)
A.E. Allen, J. LaRoche, U. Maheswari, M. Lommer, N. Schauer, P.J. Lopez, G. Finazzi, A.R. Fernie, C. Bowler: Whole-cell response of the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum to iron starvation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(30), 10438–10443 (2008)
T. Mock, M.P. Samanta, V. Iverson, C. Berthiaume, M. Robison, K. Holtermann, C. Durkin, S.S. BonDurant, K. Richmond, M. Rodesch, T. Kallas, E.L. Huttlin, F. Cerrina, M.R. Sussmann, E.V. Armbrust: Whole-genome expression profiling of the marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana identifies genes involved in silicon bioprocesses, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(5), 1579–1584 (2008)
P. von Dassow, H. Ogata, I. Probert, P. Wincker, C. Da Silva, S. Audic, J.-M. Claverie, C. de Vargas: Transcriptome analysis of functional differentiation between haploid and diploid cells of Emiliania huxleyi, a globally significant photosynthetic calcifying cell, Genome Biol. 10(10), R114 (2009)
M.L. Cuvelier, A.E. Allen, A. Monier, J.P. McCrow, M. Messie, S.G. Tringe, T. Woyke, R.M. Welsh, T. Ishoey, J.-H. Lee, B.J. Binder, C.L. DuPont, M. Latasa, C. Guigand, K.R. Buck, J. Hilton, M. Thiagarajan, E. Caler, B. Read, R.S. Lasken, F.P. Chavez, A.Z. Worden: Targeted metagenomics and ecology of globally important uncultured eukaryotic phytoplankton, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107(33), 14679–14684 (2010)
K.B. Andree, M. Fernández-Tejedor, L.M. Elandaloussi, S. Quijano-Scheggia, N. Sampedro, E. Garcés, J. Camp, J. Diogène: Quantitative PCR coupled with melt curve analysis for detection of selected Pseudo-nitzschia spp. (Bacillariophyceae) from the northwestern Mediterranean Sea, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77(5), 1651–1659 (2011)
A. Penna, M. Vila, S. Fraga, M.G. Giacobbe, F. Andreoni, P. Riobó, C. Vernesi: Characterization of Ostreopsis and Coolia (Dinophyceae) isolates in the western Mediterranean Sea based on morphology, toxicity and internal transcribed spacer 5.8S rDNA sequences, J. Phycol. 41(1), 212–225 (2005)
B. Genovesi, M.-S. Shin-Grzebyk, D. Grzebyk, M. Laabir, P.-A. Gagnaire, A. Vaquer, A. Pastoureaud, B. Lasserre, Y. Collos, P. Berrebi: Assessment of cryptic species diversity within blooms and cyst bank of the Alexandrium tamarense complex (Dinophyceae) in a Mediterranean lagoon facilitated by semi-multiplex PCR, J. Plankton Res. 33(3), 405–414 (2011)
D.G. Borkman, T.J. Smayda, C.R. Tomas, R. York, W. Strangman, J. Wright: Toxic Alexandrium peruvianum (Balech and de Mendiola) Balech and Tangen in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island (USA), Harmful Algae 19, 92–100 (2012)
F. Perini, A. Casabianca, C. Battocchi, S. Accoroni, C. Totti, A. Penna: New approach using the real-time PCR method for estimation of the toxic marine dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata in marine environment, PLoS One 6(3), e17699 (2011)
S. Nagai: Development of a multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of six Alexandrium species (Dinophyceae), J. Phycol. 47(3), 703–708 (2011)
J. Al-Tebrineh, L.A. Pearson, S.A. Yasar, B.A. Neilan: A multiplex PCR targeting hepato-and neurotoxigenic cyanobacteria of global significance, Harmful Algae 15, 19–25 (2012)
M.-È. Garneau, A. Schnetzer, P.D. Countway, A.C. Jones, E.L. Seubert, D.A. Caron: Examination of the seasonal dynamics of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella at Redondo Beach, California, by quantitative PCR, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77(21), 7669–7680 (2011)
S.A. Murray, M. Wiese, A. Stuken, S. Brett, R. Kellmann, G. Hallegraeff, B.A. Neilan: sxtA-Based quantitative molecular assay to identify saxitoxin-producing harmful algal blooms in marine waters, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77(19), 7050–7057 (2011)
A. Penna, E. Bertozzini, C. Battocchi, L. Galluzzi, M.G. Giacobbe, M. Vila, E. Garces, A. Luglié: M. Magnani: Monitoring of HAB species in the Mediterranean Sea through molecular methods, J. Plankton Res. 29(1), 19–38 (2007)
S.M. Dittami, C. Proux, S. Rousvoal, A.F. Peters, J.M. Cock, J.-Y. Coppee, C. Boyen, T. Tonon: Microarray estimation of genomic inter-strain variability in the genus Ectocarpus (Phaeophyceae), BMC Mol. Biol. 1, 2 (2011)
J.U. Kegel, Y. Del Amo, L. Costes, L.K. Medlin: Testing a microarray to detect and monitor toxic microalgae in Arcachon Bay in France, Microarrays 2(1), 1–23 (2013)
S.M. Dittami, Y. Pazos, M. Laspra, L.K. Medlin: Microarray testing for the presence of toxic algae monitoring programme in Galicia (NW Spain), Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20(10), 6778–6793 (2013)
A. de Bruin, B.W. Ibelings, E. Van Donk: Molecular techniques in phytoplankton research: From allozyme electrophoresis to genomics, Hydrobiologia 491(1–3), 47–63 (2003)
T.I. McLean: Eco-omics: A review of the application of genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics for the study of the ecology of harmful Algae, Microb. Ecol. 65, 901–915 (2013)
A. Jamers, R. Blust, W. De Coen: Omics in algae: Paving the way for a systems biological understanding of algal stress phenomena?, Aquat. Toxicol. 92(3), 114–121 (2009)
I. Yang, U. John, S. Beszteri, G. Gloeckner, B. Krock, A. Goesmann, A.D. Cembella: Comparative gene expression in toxic versus non-toxic strains of the marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum, BMC Genomics 11, 248 (2010)
N. Jaeckisch, I. Yang, S. Wohlrab, G. Glöckner, J. Kroymann, H. Vogel, A. Cembella, U. John: Comparative genomic and transcriptomic characterization of the toxigenic marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii, PLoS ONE 6(12), e28012 (2011)
B.L. Nunn, A.T. Timperman: Marine proteomics, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 332, 281–289 (2007)
L.L. Chan, I.J. Hodgkiss, S. Lu, S.C.L. Lo: Use of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis proteome reference maps of dinoflagellates for species recognition of causative agents of harmful algal blooms, Proteomics 4(1), 180–192 (2004)
L.L. Chan, I.J. Hodgkiss, J.M.F. Wan, J.H.K. Lum, A.S.C. Mak, W.H. Sit, S.C.L. Lo: Proteomic study of a model causative agent of harmful algal blooms, Prorocentrum triestinum II: The use of differentially expressed protein profiles under different growth phases and growth conditions for bloom prediction, Proteomics 4(10), 3214–3226 (2004)
L. Wang, S.A. Shankarappa, R. Tong, J.B. Ciolino, J.H. Tsui, H.H. Chiang, D.S. Kohane: Topical drug formulations for prolonged corneal anesthesia, Cornea 32(7), 1040–1045 (2013)
D.M. Anderson, A.D. Cembella, G.M. Hallegraeff: Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: Paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 143–176 (2012)
O. Fiehn: Combining genomics, metabolome analysis, and biochemical modelling to understand metabolic networks, Comp. Funct. Genomics 2(3), 155–168 (2001)
A. Ianora, G. Romano, Y. Carotenuto, F. Esposito, V. Roncalli, I. Buttino, A. Miralto: Impact of the diatom oxylipin 15S-HEPE on the reproductive success of the copepod Temora stylifera, Hydrobiologia 666(1), 265–275 (2011)
A.R. Fernie, T. Obata, A.E. Allen, W.L. Araujo, C. Bowler: Leveraging metabolomics for functional investigations in sequenced marine diatoms, Trends Plant Sci. 17(7), 395–403 (2012)
P. Hess: Specific, Quantitative and metabolomic techniques for the analysis of marine biotoxins, Paper presented at the Marine and Freshwater Toxins Analysis, 4th H. Symp. AOAC Task Force Meed. Baiona (2013)
D.-Z. Wang: Neurotoxins from marine dinoflagellates: A brief review, Mar. Drugs 6(2), 349–371 (2008)
D.-Z. Wang, Y. Gao, L. Lin, H.-S. Hong: Comparative proteomic analysis reveals proteins putatively involved in toxin biosynthesis in the marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella, Mar. Drugs 11(1), 213–232 (2013)
M. Wiese, P.M. D'Agostino, T.K. Mihali, M.C. Moffitt, B.A. Neilan: Neurotoxic alkaloids: Saxitoxin and its analogs, Mar. Drugs 8(7), 2185–2211 (2010)
M.R. Watters: Marine neurotoxins as a starting point to drugs. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins: Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.M. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 889–896
K.D. Cusick, G.S. Sayler: An Overview on the marine neurotoxin, saxitoxin: Genetics, molecular targets, methods of detection and ecological functions, Mar. Drugs 11(4), 991–1018 (2013)
J.J. Fernández, M.L. Candenas, M.L. Souto, M.M. Trujillo, M. Norte: Okadaic acid, useful tool for studying cellular processes, Curr. Med. Chem. 9, 229–262 (2002)
H. Fujiki, M. Suganuma: Unique features of the okadaic acid activity on class of tumor promoters, J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 125, 150–155 (1999)
M.M. Islam, S. Begum, L. Lin, A. Okamura, M. Du, S. Fujimura: Synergistic cytotoxic effect between serine-threonine phosphatase inhibitors and 5-fluorouracil: A novel concept for modulation of cytotoxic effect, Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 49, 111–118 (2002)
V. Valdiglesias, J. Méndez, E. Pásaro, E. Cemeli, D. Anderson, B. Laffon: Assessment of okadaic acid effects on cytotoxicity, DNA damage and DNA repair in human cells, Mutation Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 689(1/2), 74–79 (2010)
J. He, Y. Yang, H. Xu, X. Zhang, X.M. Li: Olanzapine attenuates the okadaic acid-induced spatial memory impairment and hippocampal cell death in rats, Neuropsychopharmacology 30, 1511–1520 (2005)
A.G. Cabado, F. Leira, J.M. Vieites, M.R. Vieytes, L. Botana: Caspase-8 activation initiates okadaic acid-induced apoptosis in neuroblastoma. In: Molluscan Shellfish Safety, ed. by B.R.A. Villalba, J.L. Romalde, R. Beiras (Consellería de Pesca e Asuntos Marítimos da Xunta de Galicia and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Santiago de Compostela 2003) pp. 107–117
J. Lago, F. Santaclara, J.M. Vieites, A.G. Cabado: Collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential and caspases activation are early events in okadaic acidtreated Caco-2 cells, Toxicon 46(5), 579–586 (2005)
A. Franchini, D. Malagoli, E. Ottaviani: Targets and effects of yessotoxin, okadaic acid and palytoxin: A differential review, Mar. Drugs 8(3), 658–677 (2010)
V. Valdiglesias, B. Laffon, E. Pásaro, E. Cemeli, D. Anderson, J. Méndez: Induction of oxidative DNA damage by the marine toxin okadaic acid depends on human cell type, Toxicon 57(6), 882–888 (2011)
V. Valdiglesias, B. Laffon, E. Pásaro, J. Méndez: Evaluation of okadaic acid-induced genotoxicity in human cells using the micronucleous test and gamma H2AX analysis, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A: Current Issues 74(15/16), 980–992 (2011)
V. Valdiglesias, B. Laffon, E. Pásaro, J. Méndez: Okadaic acid induces morphological changes, apoptosis and cell cycle alterations in different human cell types, J. Environ. Monit. 13(6), 1831–1840 (2011)
C. Vale, L.M. Botana: Marine toxins and the cytoskeleton: Okadaic acid and dinophysistoxins, FEBS Journal 275(24), 6060–6066 (2008)
F. Leira, C. Alvarez, J.M. Vieites, M.R. Vieytes, L.M. Botana: Characterization of distinct apoptotic changes induced by okadaic acid and yessotoxin in the BE(2)-M17 neuroblastoma cell line, Toxicol. In Vitro 16(1), 23–31 (2002)
A.G. Cabado, F. Leira, M.R. Vieytes, J.M. Vieites, L.M. Botana: Cytoskeletal disruption is the key factor that triggers apoptosis in okadaic acid-treated neuroblastoma cells, Arch. Toxicol. 78, 74–85 (2005)
F. Santaclara, J. Lago, J.M. Vieites, A.G. Cabado: Effect of okadaic acid on integrins and structural proteins in BE(2)-M17 cells, Arch. Toxicol. 79(10), 582–586 (2005)
A. Franchini, D. Malagoli, E. Ottaviani: Targets and effects of yessotoxin, okadaic acid and palytoxin: A differential review, Mar. Drugs 8(3), 658–677 (2010)
C. Lamas, I. Valverde, J. Lago, J.M. Vieites, A.G. Cabado: In vitro evaluation of apoptotic markers triggered by PTX-2 in Caco-2 and neuroblastoma cells, Egypt. J. Nat. Toxins 3, 17–33 (2006)
C. Lamas, I. Valverde, J. Lago, J.M. Vieites, A.G. Cabado: Comparison between cytotoxic effects induced by PTX-2 in vitro in two human cell lines, Egypt. J. Nat. Toxins 3, 1–16 (2006)
Z.H. Zhou, M. Komiyama, K. Terao, Y. Shimada: Effects of pectenotoxin-1 on liver cells in vitro, Nat. Toxins 2, 132–135 (1994)
B. Espiña, J.A. Rubiolo: Marine toxins and the cytoskeleton: Pectenotoxins, unusual macrolides that disrupt actin, FEBS Journal 275(24), 6082–6088 (2008)
H.D. Chae, T.S. Choi, B.M. Kim, J.H. Jung, Y.J. Bang, D.Y. Shin: Oocyte-based screening of cytokinesis inhibitors and identification of pectenotoxin-2 that induces Bim/Bax-mediated apoptosis in p53-deficient tumors, Oncogene 24, 4813–4819 (2005)
N. Vilariño, B. Espina: Pharmacology of pectenotoxins. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins, Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.M. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 361–380
T. Yasumoto, M. Murata, Y. Oshima, G.K. Matsumoto, J. Clardy: Diarrhetic shellfish poisoning. In: Seafood Toxins, ed. by E.P. Ragelis (American Chemical Society, Washington 1984) pp. 207–214
European Union Reference Laboratory for Marine Biotoxins: EU Harmonised Standard Operating Procedure for detection of lipophilic toxins by mouse bioassay (2009), pp. 1–14
European Food Safety Authority: Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food chain on a request from the European Commission on marine biotoxins in shellfish – yessotoxin group, EFSA Journal 907, 1–62 (2008)
K. Terao, E. Ito, M. Oarada, M. Murata, T. Yasumoto: Histopathological studies on experimental marine toxin poisoning–5. The effects in mice of yessotoxin isolated from Patinopecten yessoensis and of a desulfated derivative, Toxicon 28, 1095–1104 (1990)
A. Franchini, E. Marchesini, R. Poletti, E. Ottaviani: Acute toxic effect of the algal yessotoxin on Purkinje cells from the cerebellum of Swiss CD1 mice, Toxicon 43, 347–352 (2004)
A. Alfonso, L. de la Rosa, M.R. Vieytes, T. Yasumoto, L.M. Botana: Yessotoxin a novel phycotoxin, activates phosphodiesterase activity. Effect of yessotoxin on cAMP levels in human lymphocytes, Biochem. Pharmacol. 65, 193–208 (2003)
A. Tubaro, V. Dell'Ovo, S. Sosa, C. Florio: Yessotoxins: A toxicological overview, Toxicon 56(2), 163–172 (2010)
A. Alfonso: Yessotoxins, pharmacology and mechanism of action: Biological detection. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins, Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.M. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 315–327
A. Perez-Gomez, A. Ferrero-Gutierrez, A. Novelli, J.M. Franco, B. Paz, M.T. Fernández-Sánchez: Potent neurotoxic action of the shellfish biotoxin yessotoxin on cultured cerebellar neurons, Toxicol. Sci. 90(1), 168–177 (2006)
F. Leira, C. Alvarez, A.G. Cabado, J.M. Vieites, M.R. Vieytes, L.M. Botana: Development of a F actin-based live-cell fluorimetric microplate assay for diarrhetic shellfish toxins, Anal. Biochem. 317, 129–135 (2003)
I.R. Ares, M.C. Louzao, M.R. Vieytes, T. Yasumoto, L.M. Botana: Actin cytoskeleton of rabbit intestinal cells is a target for potent marine phycotoxins, J. Exp. Biol. 208(22), 4345–4354 (2005)
G. Ronzitti, F. Callegari, C. Malaguti, G.P. Rossini: Selective disruption of the E-cadherin-catenin system by an algal toxin, Br. J. Cancer 90, 1100–1107 (2004)
F. Callegari, S. Sosa, S. Ferrari, M.R. Soranzo, S. Pierotti, T. Yasumoto, A. Tubaro, G.P. Rossini: Oral administration of yessotoxin stabilizes E-cadherin in mouse colon, Toxicology 227, 145–155 (2006)
M.S. Korsnes, A. Espenes: Yessotoxin as an apoptotic inducer, Toxicon 57(7/8), 947–958 (2011)
L.M. Botana, A. Alfonso, M.R. Vieytes, M.I. Loza-Garcia: Therapeutic use of yessotoxins as human tumor cell growth inhibitors, European Patent EP1875906 (2008)
P. Ciminiello, E. Fattorusso: Yessotoxins chemistry, metabolism and chemical analysis. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins. Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.M. Botana (Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 287–314
S. Ferrari, P. Ciminiello, C. Dell'Aversano, M. Forino, C. Malaguti, A. Tubaro, R. Poletti, T. Yasumoto, E. Fattorusso, G.P. Rossini: Structure–activity relationships of yessotoxins in cultured cells, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17, 1251–1257 (2004)
M.J. Pazos, A. Alfonso, M.R. Vieytes, T. Yasumoto, L.M. Botana: Kinetic analysis of the interaction between yessotoxin and analogues and immobilized phosphodiesterases using a resonant mirror optical biosensor, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 18, 1155–1160 (2005)
A. Alfonso, Y. Román, M.R. Vieytes, K. Ofuji, M. Satake, T. Yasumoto, L.M. Botana: Azaspiracid-4 inhibits Ca${}^{{2+}}$ entry by stored operated channels in human T lymphocytes, Biochem. Pharmacol. 69(11), 1627–1636 (2005)
A. Alfonso, M.R. Vieytes, K. Ofuji, M. Satake, K.C. Nicolaou, M.O. Frederick, L.M. Botana: Azaspiracids modulate intracellular pH levels in human lymphocytes, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 346(3), 1091–1099 (2006)
Y. Román, A. Alfonso, M.C. Louzao, L.A. de la Rosa, F. Leira, J.M. Vieites, M.R. Vieytes, K. Ofuji, M. Satake, T. Yasumoto, L.M. Botana: Azaspiracid-1, a potent, nonapoptotic new phycotoxin with several cell targets, Cell Signal. 14, 703–716 (2002)
Y. Román, A. Alfonso, M.R. Vieytes, K. Ofuji, M. Satake, T. Yasumoto, L.M. Botana: Effects of azaspiracids 2 and 3 on intracellular cAMP, [Ca${}^{{2+}}$], and pH, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17(10), 1338–1349 (2004)
A. Furey, S. O'Doherty, K. O'Callaghan, M. Lehane, K.J. James: Azaspiracid poisoning (AZP) toxins in shellfish: Toxicological and health considerations, Toxicon 56(2), 173–190 (2010)
G. Ronzitti, P. Hess, N. Rehmann, G.P. Rossini: Azaspiracid-1 alters the E-cadherin pool in epithelial cells, Toxicol. Sci. 95(2), 427–435 (2007)
M.J. Twiner, P. Hess, M.Y. Dechraoui, T. McMahon, M.S. Samons, M. Satake, T. Yasumoto, J.S. Ramsdell, G.J. Doucette: Cytotoxic and cytoskeletal effects of azaspiracid-1 on mammalian cell lines, Toxicon 45(7), 891–900 (2005)
N. Vilariño, K.C. Nicolaou, M.O. Frederick, E. Cagide, I.R. Ares, M.C. Louzao, M.R. Vieytes, L.M. Botana: Cell growth inhibition and actin cytoskeleton disorganization induced by azaspiracid-1 structure–activity studies, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19(11), 1459–1466 (2006)
M. Bellocci, G.L. Sala, F. Callegari, G.P. Rossini: Azaspiracid-1 inhibits endocytosis of plasma membrane proteins in epithelial cells, Toxicol. Sci. 117(1), 109–121 (2010)
P. Hess, P. McCarron, N. Rehmann, J. Kilcoyne, T. McMahon, G. Ryan, M.P. Ryan, G.J. Doucette: Isolation and Purification of Azaspiracids from Naturally Contaminated Materials and Evaluation of Their Toxicological Effects. Final Project Report, Marine Enviromental and Health Series, Vol. 129 (Marine Institute, Galway, Ireland 2007)
E. Ito, M. Satake, K. Ofuji, M. Higashi, K. Harigaya, T. McMahon, T. Yasumoto: Chronic effects in mice caused by oral administration of sublethal doses of azaspiracid, a new marine toxin isolated from mussels, Toxicon 40(2), 193–203 (2002)
M. Satake, K. Ofuji, H. Naoki, K.J. James, A. Furey, T. McMahon, J. Silke, T. Yasumoto: Azaspiracid, a new marine toxin having unique spiro ring assemblies, isolated from Irish mussels, Mytilus edulis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120(38), 9967–9968 (1998)
K. Ofuji, M. Satake, T. McMahon, J. Silke, K.J. James, H. Naoki, Y. Oshima, T. Yasumoto: Two analogs of azaspiracid isolated from mussels, Mytilus edulis, involved in human intoxication in Ireland, Nat. Toxins 7(3), 99–102 (1999)
E. Ito, K. Terao, T. McMahon, J. Silke, T. Yasumoto: Acute pathological changes in mice caused by crude extracts of novel toxins isolated from Irish mussels. In: Harmful Algae, ed. by B. Reguera, J. Blanco, M.L. Fernández, T. Wyatt (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Santiago de Compostela 1998) pp. 588–589
E. Ito, M. Satake, K. Ofuji, T. McMahone, J. Silke, K. James, T. Yasumoto: Small intestinal injuries in mice caused by and new toxing, azaspiracid, isolated from Irish mussels. In: Harmful and Toxic Algal Blooms, ed. by T. Yasumoto, Y. Oshima, Y. Fukuyo (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Santiago de Compostela 2000) p. 395
A.F. Flanagan, K.R. Callanan, J. Donlon, R. Palmer, A. Forde, M. Kane: A cytotoxicity assay for the detection and differentiation of two families of shellfish toxins, Toxicon 39(7), 1021–1027 (2001)
Z. Cao, K.T. LePage, M.O. Frederick, K.C. Nicolaou, T.F. Murray: Involvement of caspase activation in azaspiracid-induced neurotoxicity in neocortical neurons, Toxicol. Sci. 114(2), 323–334 (2010)
European Food Safety Authority: Marine biotoxins in shellfish-Saxitoxin group. Scientific opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain, EFSA Journal 1019, 1–76 (2009)
R. Shinohara, T. Akimoto, O. Iwamoto, T. Hirokawa, M. Yotsu-Yamashita, K. Yamaoka, K. Nagasawa: Synthesis of skeletal analogues of saxitoxin derivatives and evaluation of their inhibitory activity on sodium ion channels Na${}_{{\text{v}}}$1.4 and Na${}_{{\text{v}}}$1.5, Chem. Eur. J. 17(43), 12144–12152 (2011)
S.A. Murray, M. Wiese, B.A. Neilan, R.J.S. Orr, M. de Salas, S. Brett, G. Hallegraeff: A reinvestigation of saxitoxin production and sxtA in the 'non-toxic' Alexandrium tamarense group V clade, Harmful Algae 18, 96–104 (2012)
M.C. Wylie, V.M. Johnson, E. Carpino, K. Mullen, K. Hauser, A. Nedder, J.N. Kheir, A.J. Rodriguez-Navarro, D. Zurakowski, C.B. Berde: Respiratory, neuromuscular, and cardiovascular effects of neosaxitoxin in isoflurane-anesthetized sheep, Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 37(2), 152–158 (2012)
A.M.S. Mayer, M.T. Hamann: Marine pharmacology in 2001–2002: Marine compounds with anthelmintic, antibacterial, anticoagulant, antidiabetic, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, antiplatelet, antiprotozoal, antituberculosis, and antiviral activities; affecting the cardiovascular, immune and nervous systems and other miscellaneous mechanisms of action, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 140(3–4), 265–286 (2005)
I.A. Ross, W. Johnson, P.P. Sapienza, C.S. Kim: Effects of the seafood toxin domoic acid on glutamate uptake by rat astrocytes, Food Chem. Toxicol. 38(11), 1005–1011 (2000)
G. Giordano, T.J. Kavanagh, E.M. Faustman, C.C. White, L.G. Costa: Low-level domoic acid protects mouse cerebellar granule neurons from acute neurotoxicity: Role of glutathione, Toxicol. Sci. 132(2), 399–408 (2013)
M.A. Friedman, L.E. Fleming, M. Fernandez, P. Bienfang, K. Schrank, R. Dickey, M.-Y. Bottein, L. Backer, R. Ayyar, R. Weisman, S. Watkins, R. Granade, A. Reich: Ciguatera fish poisoning: Treatment, prevention and management, Mar. Drugs 6(3), 456–479 (2008)
R.W. Dickey, S.M. Plakas: Ciguatera: A public health perspective, Toxicon 56(2), 123–136 (2010)
G.M. Nicholson, R.J. Lewis: Ciguatoxins: Cyclic polyether modulators of voltage-gated Iion channel function, Mar. Drugs 4(3), 82–118 (2006)
R.N. Murrell, J.E. Gibson: Brevetoxins 2, 3, 6, and 9 show variability in potency and cause significant induction of DNA damage and apoptosis in Jurkat E6-1 cells, Arch. Toxicol. 83(11), 1009–1019 (2009)
N.V. Kulagina, T.J. O'Shaughnessy, W. Ma, J.S. Ramsdell, J.J. Pancrazio: Pharmacological effects of the marine toxins, brevetoxin and saxitoxin, on murine frontal cortex neuronal networks, Toxicon 44(6), 669–676 (2004)
R.N. Murrell, J.E. Gibson: Brevetoxin 2 alters expression of apoptotic, DNA damage and cytokine genes in Jurkat cells, Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 30(3), 182–191 (2010)
S.C. Hilderbrand, R.N. Murrell, J.E. Gibson, J.M. Brown: Marine brevetoxin induces IgE-independent mast cell activation, Arch. Toxicol. 85(2), 135–141 (2011)
Z. Cao, J. George, W.H. Gerwick, D.G. Baden, J.D. Rainier, T.F. Murray: Influence of lipid-soluble gating modifier toxins on sodium influx in neocortical neurons, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 326(2), 604–613 (2008)
P. Taupin: Brevetoxin derivative compounds for stimulating neuronal growth, Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 19(2), 269–274 (2009)
S. Bragadeeswaran, D. Therasa, K. Prabhu, K. Kathiresan: Biomedical and pharmacological potential of tetrodotoxin-producing bacteria isolated from marine pufferfish Arothron hispidus (Muller, 1841), J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 16(3), 421–431 (2011)
B. Hegyi, I. Komaromi, K. Kistamas, F. Ruzsnavszky, K. Vaczi, B. Horvath, J. Magyar, T. Banyasz, P.P. Nanasi, N. Szentandrassy: Tetrodotoxin blockade on canine cardiac L-Type Ca${}^{{2+}}$ channels depends on pH and redox potential, Mar. Drugs 11(6), 2140–2153 (2013)
F.R. Nieto, E.J. Cobos, M.A. Tejada, C. Sanchez-Fernandez, R. Gonzalez-Cano, C.M. Cendan: Tetrodotoxin (TTX) as a therapeutic agent for pain, Mar. Drugs 10(2), 281–305 (2012)
A. Turabi, A.R. Plunkett: The application of genomic and molecular data in the treatment of chronic cancer pain, J. Surg. Oncol. 105(5), 494–501 (2012)
F.R. Nieto, J.M. Entrena, C.M. Cendán, E. del Pozo, J.M. Vela, J.M. Baeyens: Tetrodotoxin inhibits the development and expression of neuropathic pain induced by paclitaxel in mice, Pain 137, 520–531 (2008)
N.A. Hagen, P. du Souich, B. Lapointe, M. Ong-Lam, B. Dubuc, D. Walde, R. Love, A.H. Ngoc: Tetrodotoxin for moderate to severe cancer pain: A randomized, double blind, parallel design multicenter study, J. Pain Symptom Manag. 35(4), 420–429 (2008)
N.A. Hagen, B. Lapointe, M. Ong-Lam, B. Dubuc, D. Walde, B. Gagnon, R. Love, R. Goel, P. Hawley, A.H. Ngoc, P. du Souich: A multicentre open-label safety and efficacy study of tetrodotoxin for cancer pain, Curr. Oncol. 18(3), E109–E116 (2011)
F.R. Nieto, E.J. Cobos, M.Á. Tejada, C. Sánchez-Fernández, R. González-Cano, C. Miguel Cendán: Tetrodotoxin (TTX) as a therapeutic agent for pain, Mar. Drugs 10, 281–305 (2012)
L. Wang, S.A. Shankarappa, R. Tong, J.B. Ciolino, J.H. Tsui, H.H. Chiang, D.S. Kohane: Topical drug formulations for prolonged corneal anesthesia, Cornea 32(7), 1040–1045 (2013)
C. Vale: Palytoxins: Pharmacology and biological detection methods. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins: Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.M. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 675–691
A. Tubaro, G. Del Favero, D. Beltramo, M. Ardizzone, M. Forino, M. De Bortoli, M. Pelin, M. Poli, G. Bignami, P. Ciminiello, S. Sosa: Acute oral toxicity in mice of a new palytoxin analog: 42-Hydroxy-palytoxin, Toxicon 57(5), 755–763 (2011)
E.V. Wattenberg: Palytoxin: Exploiting a novel skin tumor promoter to explore signal transduction and carcinogenesis, Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 292(1), C24–C32 (2007)
E.V. Wattenberg: Modulation of protein kinase signaling cascades by palytoxin, Toxicon 57(3), 440–448 (2011)
R. Munday: Ocurrence and toxicology of palytoxins. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins: Pharmacology, Physiology and Detection, ed. by L.M. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 693–713
I. Valverde, J. Lago, A. Reboreda, J.M. Vieites, A.G. Cabado: Characteristics of palytoxin-induced cytotoxicity in neuroblastoma cells, Toxicol. In Vitro 22(6), 1432–1439 (2008)
I. Valverde, J. Lago, J.M. Vieites, A.G. Cabado: In vitro approaches to evaluate palytoxin-induced toxicity and cell death in intestinal cells, J. Appl. Toxicol. 28(3), 294–302 (2008)
M. Stewart, J.W. Blunt, M.H.G. Munro, W.T. Robinson, D.J. Hannah: The absolute stereochemistry of the New Zealand shellfish toxin gymnodimine, Tetrahedron Lett. 38, 4889–4890 (1997)
R. Munday: Toxicology of cyclic imines: Gymnodimine, spirolides, pinnatoxins, pteriatoxins, prorocentrolide, spiro-prorocentrimine, and symbioimines. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins: Pharmacology, Physiology, and Detection, 2nd edn., ed. by L.M. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 581–594
S.M. Gueret, M.A. Brimble: Spiroimine shellfish poisoning (SSP) and the spirolide family of shellfish toxins: Isolation, structure, biological activity and synthesis, Nat. Prod. Rep. 27(9), 1350–1366 (2010)
R. Kharrat, D. Servent, E. Girard, G. Ouanounou, M. Amar, R. Marrouchi, E. Benoit, J. Molgó: The marine phycotoxin gymnodimine targets muscular and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes with high affinity, J. Neurochem. 107(4), 952–963 (2008)
Y. Bourne, Z. Radic, R. Aráoz, T.T. Talley, E. Benoit, D. Servent, P. Taylor, J. Molgó, P. Marchot: Structural determinants in phycotoxins and AChBP conferring high affinity binding and nicotinic AChR antagonism, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(13), 6076–6081 (2010)
C.B. Wandscheer, N. Vilariño, B. Espiña, M.C. Louzao, L.M. Botana: Human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are a target of the marine toxin 13-desmethyl C spirolide, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 23(11), 1753–1761 (2010)
C.L. Trevino, L. Escobar, L. Vaca, V. Morales-Tlalpan, A.Y. Ocampo, A. Darszon: Maitotoxin; a unique pharmacological tool for elucidating Ca${}^{{2+}}$-dependent mechanisms. In: Seafood and Freshwater Toxins: Pharmacology, Physiology, and Detection, ed. by L. Botana (CRC/Taylor Francis, Boca Raton 2008) pp. 503–516
M.C. Louzao, E. Cagide, M.R. Vieytes, M. Sasaki, H. Fuwa, T. Yasumoto, L.M. Botana: The sodium channel of human excitable cells is a target for gambierol, Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 17(5/6), 257–268 (2006)
E. Cagide, M.C. Louzao, B. Espina, I.R. Ares, M.R. Vieytes, M. Sasaki, H. Fuwa, C. Tsukano, Y. Konno, M. Yotsu-Yamashita, L.A. Paquette, T. Yasumoto, L.M. Botana: Comparative cytotoxicity of gambierol versus other marine neurotoxins, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 24(6), 835–842 (2011)
E. Alonso, H. Fuwa, C. Vale, Y. Suga, T. Goto, Y. Konno, M. Sasaki, F.M. LaFerla, M.R. Vieytes, L. Gimenez-Llort, L.M. Botana: Design and synthesis of skeletal analogues of gambierol: Attenuation of amyloid-β and tau pathology with voltage-gated potassium channel and n-Methyl-d-aspartate receptor implications, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(17), 7467–7479 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martínez, A. et al. (2015). Marine Biotoxins. In: Kim, SK. (eds) Springer Handbook of Marine Biotechnology. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53971-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53971-8_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53970-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53971-8
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)