Abstract
The neurotransmitter dopamine plays a role in many different functions of the human brain, ranging from psychomotor planning to cognition. This short review addresses which parts of the dopamine system can be imaged quantitatively in the living human brain using positron-emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
Nowadays, imaging of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway in humans can be performed quantitatively using radiotracers like the aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) substrate [18F]FDOPA, vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT-2) radioligands derived from tetrabenazine or PET/SPECT radioligands that bind to the dopamine transporter (DAT). Using PET, also several other dopaminergic projection pathways (e.g. mesocortical projections) can be assessed in humans. Several antagonist PET radioligands for the dopamine D1 receptor have been developed successfully. In addition, well-validated antagonist PET and SPECT radioligands are available for imaging of dopamine D2/3 receptors in the living human brain. Recently, also agonist PET radioligands for the dopamine D2/3 receptors have become available, which afford the opportunity to evaluate the existence of the high-affinity state of these receptors in vivo. These agonist radiopharmaceuticals may also prove more sensitive to changes in dopamine concentrations (e.g. induced by the dopamine releaser amphetamine). Finally, selective antagonist PET radioligands for the dopamine D4 receptor have recently been synthesized and evaluated successfully in small laboratory animals, although these radioligands have not yet been reported as applied in human subjects.
In conclusion, after almost three decades of research, several relevant parts of the central dopamine system can be assessed quantitatively in the living human brain using PET or SPECT. Future studies may include application of agonist radioligands and more dopamine receptor subtype selective radioligands.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Dopaminergic Neuron
- Aromatic Amino Acid Decarboxylase
- Nigrostriatal Dopaminergic Pathway
- Living Human Brain
- FDOPA Uptake
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
Numerous cognitive, psychomotor and emotional functions are regulated, at least in part, by dopaminergic circuits in the brain. The neurotransmitter dopamine plays, for example, an important role in movement and the experience of pleasure (hedonia). Dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain area are relevant in coding the value of neuronal signals, and indeed, these neurons are activated by a rewarding stimuli (like amphetamines, which induce dopamine release), but may also play a role in reward learning, the prediction of error signalling and the interpretation of the salience of events (Fiorillo et al. 2003; Nakahara et al. 2004; Morris et al. 2006; Zijlstra et al. 2008; Enomoto et al. 2011). In addition, neurodegeneration of the dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain can lead to severe locomotor dysfunction such as in Parkinson’s disease. Given the broad spectrum of functions of dopamine in the brain, it is reasonable that imaging of the central dopamine system has been used frequently as a tool to assess different aspects of dopaminergic functioning in health and disease, particularly in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders.
Here we will review shortly which parts of the central dopamine system can be imaged quantitatively in the living human brain using positron-emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The findings of SPECT and PET studies of the dopamine system in different neuropsychiatric disorders will be discussed only shortly, since they will be discussed in depth in other chapters of this book.
2 Imaging of the Presynaptic Dopamine System
2.1 [18F]FDOPA and [18F]FMT
The majority of the cell bodies of dopaminergic neurons are located in the midbrain area, with axons predominantly projecting to the striatum (e.g. the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway). The scintigraphic techniques PET and SPECT offer unique means to assess the in vivo integrity of the nigrostriatal pathway. The biochemical integrity of presynaptic dopamine neurons can be assessed with the PET radioligands 6-18F-fluoro-L-DOPA ([18F]FDOPA) or 6-18F-fluoro-meta-tyrosine ([18F]FMT) (for reviews, see Booij et al. 1999; Kumakura and Cumming 2009).
[18F]FDOPA is a widely applied PET tracer commonly radiolabelled with fluorine-18, although in some clinical studies, DOPA was applied as radiolabelled with carbon-11. After injection, the radiotracer will be taken up into dopaminergic neurons by the amino acid transporter (Fig. 10.1), decarboxylated (by aromatic amino acid decarboxylase; AADC) to [18F]fluorodopamine (or [11C]dopamine when [11C]DOPA is used) and then temporarily stored in vesicles within the nerve terminals. Therefore, [18F]FDOPA distribution in dopamine neurons reflects a regulated aspect of the synthesis of dopamine in presynaptic neurons. The trapping of [18F]fluorodopamine in nigrostriatal dopamine terminals has, however, been demonstrated not to be completely irreversible (Holden et al. 1997; Cumming et al. 2001). Indeed, steady-state kinetic analyses of [18F]FDOPA PET studies have shown that besides the synthesis, also the turnover of [18F]FDOPA to O-methyl-[18F]FDOPA can be assessed (Kumakura et al. 2005). Importantly, in most clinical studies, static striatal [18F]FDOPA uptake was assessed relative to uptake in a reference tissue (reflecting the non-specific radioactivity concentration) and using linear graphical analysis. This approach is convenient for clinical studies in which arterial blood samples are commonly not available (Kumakura and Cumming 2009). However, the kinetic properties of [18F]FDOPA are complex and include not only the washout of radiotracer but also the entry of a metabolite of [18F]FDOPA into brain. Consequently, relative long acquisitions of dynamic PET images, as well as the analysis of the metabolite-corrected arterial [18F]FDOPA input function, are required to yield a more physiological index of [18F]FDOPA utilization, including [18F]FDOPA turnover (for a review, see Kumakura and Cumming 2009).
As an alternative to [18F]FDOPA, the tyrosine derivative [18F]FMT has been developed. This radiotracer is similar to [18F]FDOPA in that both radiotracers are substrates of AADC. However, unlike [18F]FDOPA, [18F]FMT is not a substrate for catechol-O-methyl-transferase (COMT), an enzyme essential in the breakdown of dopamine. Therefore, there are no radioactive O-methyl-metabolites which contribute to the non-specific radioactivity in the brain, which enables the use of simplified kinetic modelling approaches (Dejesus et al. 2001).
The enzyme AADC plays an important role in the synthesis of dopamine, in that it converts L-DOPA to dopamine. It is important to consider that AADC also plays a role in the synthesis of other monoamine transmitters, e.g. in the conversion of 5-hydroxytryptophan to serotonin (5-HT). Since both [18F]FDOPA and [18F]FMT are substrates of AADC, these tracers are not only converted in dopaminergic neurons but also in serotonergic and noradrenergic neurons (Brown et al. 1999; Moore et al. 2003). The striatal accumulation of these tracers does however predominantly reflect conversion in nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons (Pavese et al. 2012).
Initial PET studies applying [18F]FDOPA or [18F]FMT focused on evaluation of the nigrostriatal pathway, by studying the distribution of these tracers in the striatum (Antonini et al. 1995). Due to the better performance characteristics of the PET systems, as well as the improved PET data analysis methods, also extrastriatal radioactivity concentrations can nowadays be quantified (e.g. cortical areas). However, and as mentioned before, due to the expression of AADC in all monoaminergic neurons, accumulation in the raphe nuclei and locus coeruleus likely reflects predominantly serotonergic and noradrenergic activity, respectively, instead of accumulation in dopaminergic neurons (Ito et al. 2008; Lewis et al. 2012; Pavese et al. 2012). An important consideration when studying extrastriatal brain regions is that the reliability of measurements in extrastriatal regions is lower than in the striatum (Egerton et al. 2010).
Neuropsychiatric diseases like Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies are characterized by severe loss of dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons. Consequently, many PET studies have utilized [18F]FDOPA and [18F]FMT to demonstrate the ability to detect loss of dopaminergic neurons in cohorts of these patients (Brooks et al. 1990; Antonini et al. 1995; Hu et al. 2000; Pavese et al. 2012). In addition, several [18F]FDOPA PET studies have been performed in patients suffering from psychosis, with the majority of them demonstrating an elevated striatal [18F]FDOPA uptake, which suggests an increased synthesis as well as dopamine turnover in these patients (Kumakura et al. 2007; Howes and Kapur 2009). [18F]FDOPA has also been applied to evaluate the role of dopamine in the human reward system (Dreher et al. 2008; Schlagenhauf et al. 2013). Finally, in healthy controls [18F]FDOPA and [18F]FMT PET have been used to assess ageing effects and cognitive functions (Braskie et al. 2008; Dreher et al. 2008; Kumakura et al. 2010).
2.2 Imaging of the VMAT-2
The vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT-2; Fig. 10.1) is located in presynaptic dopaminergic neurons. Initially, carbon-11-labelled tetrabenazine derivatives have been developed successfully for PET imaging to visualize and quantify the VMAT-2 in humans (for a review, see Kilbourn 1997). Recently, also fluorine-18-labelled radioligands for the VMAT-2 have been developed successfully (Lin et al. 2010), which affords the opportunity to use these radioligands also in hospitals not equipped with a cyclotron.
VMAT-2 is not exclusively present in dopaminergic neurons, but also in other monoaminergic neurons, including serotonergic (Guillot and Miller 2009), although the vast majority of the striatal radioactivity concentration represents binding in dopaminergic nerve terminals (Wang et al. 2010). In this regard, it is of interest that it has been suggested that VMAT-2 radioligands can also be used to visualize loss of pancreatic beta-cell mass in type 1 diabetes (Goland et al. 2009), since beta-cells express VMAT-2. However, the specific binding of VMAT-2 PET radioligands binding to beta-cell mass has recently been disputed (Virostko et al. 2011).
Like [18F]FDOPA and [18F]FMT use in PET studies, VMAT-2 studies in humans have demonstrated that VMAT-2 imaging is a sensitive technique to detect reductions of nigrostriatal dopaminergic terminals in patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease or dementia with Lewy bodies (Frey et al. 1996; Okamura et al. 2010; Burke et al. 2011a; Villemagne et al. 2011). In addition, VMAT-2 binding has been evaluated in relation to natural ageing effects (Bohnen et al. 2006). Until now, SPECT radioligands have not been developed successfully for imaging of the VMAT-2.
2.3 Imaging of the Dopamine Transporter
The dopamine transporter (DAT) is mainly located in the membrane of terminals of presynaptic dopaminergic neurons (Fig. 10.1), but is also expressed at much lower levels in cell bodies in the substantia nigra (Ma et al. 1999). Radioligands for the DAT have been developed successfully for both PET and SPECT. Regarding SPECT radioligands, radiopharmaceuticals derived from cocaine, e.g. [99mTc]TRODAT-1, [123I]β-CIT and [123I]FP-CIT, are non-selective DAT radioligands, although binding in the striatum predominantly reflects binding to DAT (Laruelle et al. 1993; Booij et al. 1997a, 2007; Dresel et al. 1998; Ziebell et al. 2010; Koopman et al. 2012). Indeed, [123I]FP-CIT SPECT studies have shown that extrastriatal binding (in the diencephalon and midbrain) can be blocked by a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, indicating predominantly binding to serotonin transporters in these brain areas (Booij et al. 2007; Ziebell et al. 2010). In addition, also promising and DAT-selective SPECT ligands, like [123I]PE2I, have been developed and used in human subjects (Kuikka et al 1998; Ziebell et al. 2010).
PET radioligands for imaging of the DAT have been developed numerously over the last two decades (see for reviews Varrone and Halldin 2012a, b). Initially, non-selective DAT radioligands (e.g. [11C/18F]CFT, Rinne et al. 2002; Nurmi et al. 2003; [18F]FP-CIT; Oh et al. 2012) were applied in human studies, but more recently reported radioligands have an improved DAT selectivity (e.g. [11C]PE2I (Hirvonen et al. 2008) (Fig. 10.2) or [18F]FE-PE2I (Varrone et al. 2009; Sasaki et al 2012)). The developed PET radioligands also afford the opportunity to assess extrastriatal DAT binding, i.e. binding in the midbrain area and the orbitofrontal area (Jucaite et al. 2005; Hirvonen et al. 2008; Yagi et al. 2010), while with SPECT only DAT binding in the striatum can be assessed accurately.
The DAT plays an important role in regulating dopaminergic neurotransmission. In this regard, appropriate regulation of the DAT expression is critical. Indeed, the DAT expression undergoes dynamic control by cellular protein kinases and phosphatases (Ramamoorthy et al. 2011). So, the DAT is not only expressed on the plasma membrane of dopaminergic neurons, as internalization of the DAT has been reported (Eriksen et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2010). Until now, it is not clear whether the abovementioned DAT radioligands label only plasma membrane-bound transporters or also internalized transporters when applied in PET/SPECT studies evaluating in vivo conditions (Earley et al. 2011). The radioligand binding characteristics to internalized transporters may differ from those transporters that are not internalized. Interestingly, Guo and co-workers have recently demonstrated that radioligands binding the dopamine D2/3 receptors have a lower affinity to internalized than to non-internalized receptors (Guo et al. 2010). Future studies are necessary to evaluate whether DAT internalization is a relevant consideration for in vivo imaging of DAT.
Numerous PET and SPECT studies evaluating DAT binding have shown the possibility to detect in vivo degeneration of nigrostriatal cells in disorders like Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies (Booij et al. 1997b; Varrone et al. 2001; McKeith et al. 2007; Yagi et al. 2010; Oh et al. 2012). Also, DAT binding has been examined in relation to ageing and gender effects in healthy controls, as well as the effects of polymorphism of the DAT gene (Lavalaye et al. 2000; van Dyck et al. 2005; van de Giessen et al. 2009; Troiano et al. 2010; Burke et al. 2011b). Generally speaking, brain SPECT imaging of neuroreceptors/transporters is cheaper than PET imaging, and consequently DAT imaging with SPECT is commonly used in routine clinical studies to exclude or detect loss of nigrostriatal neurons in individual patients (Booij et al. 2001; Løkkegaard et al. 2002; Catafau et al. 2004; Ziebell et al. 2012).
3 Imaging of the Postsynaptic Dopaminergic System
3.1 Imaging of Dopamine D1 Receptors
Dopamine exerts its pharmacological action through G-protein-coupled receptors. These transmembrane receptors can be divided into two subfamilies based on their pharmacological properties: the D1- (D1, D5) and D2-like receptor subfamily (D2, D3, D4; Stoof and Kebabian 1981; Strange 1993; Beaulieu and Gainetdinov 2011).
The dopamine D1 receptor is a highly prevalent dopamine receptor in the striatum and neocortex and is located postsynaptically (Cortés et al. 1989; Volkow et al. 1996). The radiopharmaceuticals [11C]NNC 112 and [11C]SCH 23390 have successfully been developed to image dopamine D1 receptors in the living human brain using PET (Fig. 10.3). Both radioligands are high-affinity dopamine D1 receptor antagonists, although they also have been reported to bind to serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptors, estimated as approximately 25 % of cortical binding being due to binding to 5-HT2A receptors (Ekelund et al. 2007). To circumvent this limitation, a recent study proposed the use of the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin. After ketanserin administration, the 5-HT2A receptor binding is inhibited, and cortical D1 receptor binding can be accurately assessed using [11C]NNC 112 in humans (Catafau et al. 2010).
Although [11C]NNC 112 and [11C]SCH 23390 bind to both dopamine D1 and 5-HT2A receptors, the affinity to dopamine D2-like receptors is substantially lower (Andersen et al. 1992) although binding to dopamine D5 receptors cannot be excluded (Sunahara et al. 1991; Chou et al. 2006). While dopamine D1 receptors are expressed at high levels in the striatum and cortical areas, the expression of dopamine D5 receptors in the brain is low (Beaulieu and Gainetdinov 2011). Consequently, in vivo binding to dopamine D5 receptors, as compared to D1 receptors, with PET radioligands like [11C]NNC 112 is likely negligible.
Dopamine receptors have been demonstrated to exist in two affinity states in vitro. The two receptor states are convertible and consist of a state of high and low affinity for the endogenous agonist dopamine (or exogenous agonists) (Sibley et al. 1982; Chio et al. 1994). The high-affinity state represents the active form of the receptors that are coupled to G proteins (Zahniser and Molinoff 1978). Regarding dopamine D1 receptors, results of in vitro experiments suggest that 20–40 % of these receptors are in the high-affinity state (Richfield et al. 1989; Mamelak et al. 1993; McCauley et al. 1995). Importantly, while antagonist radioligands label both the high- and low-affinity state of the receptors, agonist radioligands may label receptors only in its high-affinity state. So far, the available radioligands [11C]NNC 112 and [11C]SCH 23390 are both antagonists for the dopamine D1 receptor. Developments of agonist radioligands for the dopamine D1 receptor are ongoing and will enable to examine in future studies whether the high-affinity state of the dopamine D1 receptor exists in living humans (Palner et al. 2010). Also, dopamine agonist radioligands may be more sensitive to detect changes in dopamine concentrations in the synapse, e.g. changes induced by dopamine releasers like amphetamines (see below).
Since dopamine D1 receptors have been implicated in cognitive performance, dopamine D1 PET studies in healthy volunteers have been used to examine changes in working memory (McNab et al. 2009), amygdala response to affective stimuli (Takahashi et al. 2010) and natural ageing (Jucaite et al. 2010) and to study the effects of genes involved in the dopaminergic tone (Slifstein et al. 2008). Dopamine D1 receptor imaging in neuropsychiatric disorders has so far focused on schizophrenia (and the mechanism of action of antipsychotics) and cocaine addiction (Nordström et al. 1995; Karlsson et al. 2002; Hirvonen et al. 2006; Martinez et al. 2009). Until now, the development of SPECT radioligands for the dopamine D1 receptor has not been successful.
3.2 Imaging of Dopamine D2-Like Receptors
3.2.1 Dopamine D2/3 Receptor Imaging
In the past three decades, PET as well as SPECT radioligands have been developed successfully to image and quantify dopamine D2/3 receptors in the human brain.
Regarding SPECT imaging, the commonly used benzamide [123I]IBZM is an antagonist radioligand which binds with high affinity to dopamine D2/3 receptors (i.e. in the low nanomolar range) (Verhoeff et al. 1993; Videbaek et al. 2000; de Haan et al. 2003; Boot et al. 2008; Visser et al. 2008). With this radioligand striatal dopamine D2/3 receptors can be assessed accurately, and extrastriatal distribution may be visualized, particularly when using brain-dedicated SPECT systems (Fig. 10.4). The radioligand [123I]epidepride is a dopamine D2/3 receptors antagonist with an enhanced affinity (picomolar range) for the D2/3 receptors (Kessler et al. 1991). This ultrahigh-affinity SPECT radioligand allows assessing D2/3 receptors availability in extrastriatal brain areas, such as the midbrain, diencephalon and cortical areas (Kornhuber et al. 1995; Varrone et al. 2000; Glenthoj et al. 2006; Tuppurainen et al. 2010).
Regarding PET imaging, the benzamide [11C]raclopride is an antagonist radioligand that binds with high affinity to dopamine D2/3 receptors (in the low nanomolar range; Farde et al. 1986) and is commonly used in human studies (Ito et al. 2011; Martinez et al. 2011). The radioligand [11C]N-methylspiperone binds also with high affinity to dopamine D2/3 receptors, although binding has also been shown to be partly related to 5-HT2A receptors (Nyberg et al. 1999). Also antagonist PET radioligands with ultrahigh affinity for the dopamine D2/3 receptors have been developed successfully. For example, [11C]FLB 457 (Halldin et al. 1995) and [18F]fallypride (Mukherjee et al. 1995) are radioligands with a very high receptor affinity allowing for evaluation of extrastriatal dopamine D2/3 receptors (picomolar range; Mukherjee et al. 1995; for a review see Högberg 1993).
More recently, at least three agonist PET radioligands for dopamine D2/3 receptors have been developed and tested successfully in humans, that is [11C]PHNO, [11C]NPA and [11C]MNPA (Willeit et al. 2006; Laymon et al. 2009; Otsuka et al. 2009). The apomorphine derivatives NPA and MNPA bind with high affinity to both dopamine D2 and D3 receptors (Seeman et al. 1985; Neumeyer et al. 1990). In contrast, in vitro studies have shown that the affinity of PHNO is 30- to 50-fold lower for the dopamine D2 than for the D3 receptor (Freedman et al. 1994; van Vliet et al. 2000). Indeed, a recent study in humans demonstrated that binding of [11C]PHNO in several brain regions, e.g. hypothalamus, substantia nigra, ventral pallidum and globus pallidus, is predominantly to dopamine D3 receptors. On the other hand, in striatal subregions, in vivo binding is predominant to dopamine D2 receptors (Tziortzi et al. 2011). Although the agonist [11C]PHNO binds predominantly to dopamine D3 receptors in certain brain areas, selective radioligands for dopamine D2 or D3 receptors are not available yet.
Regarding dopamine D2 receptors, in vitro experiments on homogenized striata from rats and mice show that roughly 15–30 % of the receptors are in the high-affinity state with a range up to 80 % depending on the detection method used. In more intact tissue (brain slices), 90 % of these receptors may even be in the high-affinity state (van Wieringen et al. 2013). Initial results of in vivo PET measurements using amphetamine in non-human primates suggested that 60–80 % of these receptors are in the high-affinity state (Narendran et al. 2004). However, although several attempts have been made, formerly the existence of the high- and low-affinity state has until now not been confirmed or disputed in vivo (Finnema et al. 2009; see for reviews Finnema et al. 2010; Skinbjerg et al. 2012). The results of the recent application of agonist radioligands in human PET studies suggest that 60–65 % of dopamine D2 receptors are in the high-affinity state in vivo (Narendran et al. 2010; Shotbolt et al. 2012).
As discussed earlier, dopamine agonist radioligands may be more sensitive to detect changes in dopamine concentrations in the synapse, e.g. changes induced by dopamine releasers like amphetamines (Laruelle et al. 1995) or depletion induced by AMPT (Laruelle et al. 1997; Boot et al. 2008). Indeed, recent studies have indicated that the agonist radioligands ([11C]NPA and [11C]PHNO) are more vulnerable to endogenous dopamine competition than the antagonist radioligand [11C]raclopride in humans (Narendran et al. 2010; Shotbolt et al. 2012). It can be concluded that agonist dopamine D2/3 receptors radioligands hold promise for studying changes in dopamine concentrations although further confirmation in human subjects is required.
The dopamine D2/3 receptors are not only expressed on the plasma membrane of postsynaptic neurons, but also presynaptically (Fig. 10.1). There are two splice variants of dopamine D2 receptors, the dopamine D2 long (D2L) and the short variant (D2S) (Chio et al. 1990). These isoforms have different localizations, with D2S primarily located presynaptically (as an autoreceptor) (Khan et al. 1998). From a pharmacological point of view, these splice variants cannot be discriminated, and consequently, radioligands for the dopamine D2/3 receptors may bind to both D2L and D2S. However, since the striatal density of D2L is much higher than that of D2S (Rani and Kanungo 2006), imaging of dopamine D2/3 receptors is frequently referred to as imaging of postsynaptic D2/3 receptors. Also, imaging of the midbrain dopamine D2/3 receptors may predominantly visualize dopamine D2/3 autoreceptors (Buckholtz et al. 2010).
Dopamine D2 receptors can internalize into the intracellular compartment after agonist stimulation, similar as for other G-protein-coupled receptors. Interestingly, Guo and co-workers recently reported that dopamine D2 receptor radioligands have a lower affinity to internalized than to non-internalized receptors (Guo et al. 2010). A frequently used approach to assess dopamine release in vivo is the use of dexamphetamine (see for review Laruelle 2000). Administration of dexamphetamine intravenously or orally in doses of 0.2–0.3 mg/kg body weight induces a substantial release of endogenous dopamine, which will result in a displacement of radioligand binding to dopamine D2/3 receptors (i.e. decrease of, e.g. striatal [123I]IBZM or [11C]raclopride binding; Laruelle et al. 1995; Breier et al. 1997). Typically, administration of dexamphetamine leads to a rapid release of extracellular dopamine which is not long lasting (Breier et al. 1997). However, in imaging studies a prolonged displacement of radioligand binding has been observed, which may be caused (partly) by receptor internalization (Laruelle 2000; Cárdenas et al. 2004; Scott et al. 2007). Indeed, studies in knockout mice, which are incapable of internalizing dopamine D2 receptors, suggest that the prolonged displacement is mainly due to internalization of D2 receptors (Skinbjerg et al 2010). Additional studies are needed to demonstrate whether molecular imaging studies are able to assess internalization of dopamine D2 receptors in humans, which may be relevant to study the role of a possible abnormal internalization of these receptors in neuropsychiatric disorders.
3.2.2 Dopamine D4 Receptor Imaging
The dopamine D4 receptor was cloned for the first time in 1991 (Van Tol et al. 1991) and is thought to play a role in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. This receptor is mainly expressed postsynaptically (Rivera et al. 2002). In contrast to dopamine D2/3 receptors, dopamine D4 receptors do not internalize after agonist stimulation (Spooren et al. 2010). Interestingly, the antipsychotic clozapine, for instance, demonstrates a substantially higher affinity for the dopamine D4 than for the D2 receptor subtype (Van Tol et al. 1991; Eisenegger et al. 2010; Smith 2010). Very recently, progress has been reported on the development of a dopamine D4 receptor radioligand. This has been a challenging task as the density of dopamine D4 receptors in the human brain is much lower than that of other D2-like receptors (Marazziti et al. 2009) (Lacivita et al. 2010; Kügler et al. 2011). Although Lacivita and co-workers reported that their radioligand mainly demonstrated high binding in the retina of non-primates (Lacivita et al. 2010), it is promising that a recent study demonstrated clear brain uptake of a dopamine D4 receptor antagonist radioligand in mice (Kügler et al. 2011).
4 Conclusion
Imaging of the nigrostriatal pathway in humans can be performed quantitatively with PET and SPECT techniques, using the PET radiotracer [18F]FDOPA, PET radioligands for the VMAT-2 and PET or SPECT radioligands for the DAT. With PET, also several other dopaminergic projections (e.g. mesocortical projections) can be assessed adequately in the human brain. Several antagonist PET radioligands for the dopamine D1 receptor have been developed successfully. In addition, well-validated antagonist PET and SPECT radioligands are available to image dopamine D2/3 receptors in the living human brain. Recently, also agonist PET radioligands for the dopamine D2/3 receptors have been developed, which affords the opportunity to evaluate the existence of the high-affinity state of these receptors in vivo, and these radiopharmaceuticals may be more sensitive to detect changes in dopamine concentrations. Finally, although selective antagonist PET radioligands for the dopamine D4 receptor have been synthesized and evaluated successfully in small laboratory animals, these radioligands have not yet been applied in human research.
References
Andersen PH, Grønvald FC, Hohlweg R et al (1992) NNC-112, NNC-687 and NNC-756, new selective and highly potent dopamine D1 receptor antagonists. Eur J Pharmacol 219:45–52
Antonini A, Vontobel P, Psylla M et al (1995) Complementary positron emission tomographic studies of the striatal dopaminergic system in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 52:1183–1190
Beaulieu JM, Gainetdinov RR (2011) The physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of dopamine receptors. Pharmacol Rev 63:182–217
Bohnen NI, Albin RL, Koeppe RA (2006) Positron emission tomography of monoaminergic vesicular binding in aging and Parkinson disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26:1198–1212
Booij J, Andringa G, Rijks LJ et al (1997a) [123I]FP-CIT binds to the dopamine transporter as assessed by biodistribution studies in rats and SPECT studies in MPTP-lesioned monkeys. Synapse 27:183–190
Booij J, Tissingh G, Boer GJ (1997b) [123I]FP-CIT SPECT shows a pronounced decline of striatal dopamine transporter labelling in early and advanced Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 62:133–140
Booij J, Tissingh G, Winogrodzka A, van Royen EA (1999) Imaging of the dopaminergic neurotransmission system using single-photon emission tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with parkinsonism. Eur J Nucl Med 26:171–182
Booij J, Speelman JD, Horstink MW, Wolters EC (2001) The clinical benefit of imaging striatal dopamine transporters with [123I]FP-CIT SPET in differentiating patients with presynaptic parkinsonism from those with other forms of parkinsonism. Eur J Nucl Med 28:266–272
Booij J, de Jong J, de Bruin K, Knol R, de Win MM, van Eck-Smit BL (2007) Quantification of striatal dopamine transporters with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT is influenced by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy control subjects. J Nucl Med 48:359–366
Boot E, Booij J, Hasler G et al (2008) AMPT-induced monoamine depletion in humans: evaluation of two alternative [123I]IBZM SPECT procedures. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1350–1356
Braskie MN, Wilcox CE, Landau SM et al (2008) Relationship of striatal dopamine synthesis capacity to age and cognition. J Neurosci 28:14320–14328
Breier A, Su T-P, Saunders R, Carson R et al (1997) Schizophrenia is associated with elevated amphetamine-induced synaptic dopamine concentrations: evidence from a novel positron emission tomography method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:2569–2574
Brooks DJ, Ibanez V, Sawle GV et al (1990) Differing patterns of striatal 18F-dopa uptake in Parkinson’s disease, multiple system atrophy, and progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Neurol 28:547–555
Brown WD, DeJesus OT, Pyzalski RW (1999) Localization of trapping of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-m-tyrosine, an aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase tracer for PET. Synapse 34:111–123
Buckholtz JW, Treadway MT, Cowan RL et al (2010) Dopaminergic network differences in human impulsivity. Science 329:532
Burke JF, Albin RL, Koeppe RA et al (2011a) Assessment of mild dementia with amyloid and dopamine terminal positron emission tomography. Brain 134:1647–1657
Burke SM, van de Giessen E, de Win M et al (2011b) Serotonin and dopamine transporters in relation to neuropsychological functioning, personality traits and mood in young adult healthy subjects. Psychol Med 41:419–429
Cárdenas L, Houle S, Kapur S, Busto UE (2004) Oral D-amphetamine causes prolonged displacement of [11C]raclopride as measured by PET. Synapse 51:27–31
Catafau AM, Tolosa E, DaTSCAN Clinically Uncertain Parkinsonian Syndromes Study Group (2004) Impact of dopamine transporter SPECT using 123I-Ioflupane on diagnosis and management of patients with clinically uncertain Parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord 19:1175–1182
Catafau AM, Searle GE, Bullich S (2010) Imaging cortical dopamine D1 receptors using [11C]NNC112 and ketanserin blockade of the 5-HT 2A receptors. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30:985–993
Chen R, Furman CA, Gnegy ME (2010) Dopamine transporter trafficking: rapid response on demand. Future Neurol 5:123
Chio CL, Hess GF, Graham RS, Huff RM (1990) A second molecular form of D2 dopamine receptor in rat and bovine caudate nucleus. Nature 343:266–269
Chio CL, Lajiness ME, Huff RM (1994) Activation of heterologously expressed D3 dopamine receptors: comparison with D2 dopamine receptors. Mol Pharmacol 45:51–60
Chou YH, Halldin C, Farde L (2006) Clozapine binds preferentially to cortical D1-like dopamine receptors in the primate brain: a PET study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 185:29–35
Cortés R, Gueye B, Pazos A, Probst A, Palacios JM (1989) Dopamine receptors in human brain: autoradiographic distribution of D1 sites. Neuroscience 28:263–273
Cumming P, Munk OL, Doudet D (2001) Loss of metabolites from monkey striatum during PET with FDOPA. Synapse 41:212–218
de Haan L, van Bruggen M, Lavalaye J, Booij J, Dingemans PM, Linszen D (2003) Subjective experience and D2 receptor occupancy in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia treated with low-dose olanzapine or haloperidol: a randomized, double-blind study. Am J Psychiatry 160:303–309
Dejesus OT, Endres CJ, Shelton SE, Nickles RJ, Holden JE (2001) Noninvasive assessment of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase activity in aging rhesus monkey brain in vivo. Synapse 39:58–63
Dreher JC, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Kohn P, Berman KF (2008) Age-related changes in midbrain dopaminergic regulation of the human reward system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:15106–15111
Dresel SH, Kung MP, Plössl K, Meegalla SK, Kung HF (1998) Pharmacological effects of dopaminergic drugs on in vivo binding of [99mTc]TRODAT-1 to the central dopamine transporters in rats. Eur J Nucl Med 25:31–39
Earley CJ, Kuwabara H, Wong DF et al (2011) The dopamine transporter is decreased in the striatum of subjects with restless legs syndrome. Sleep 34:341–347
Egerton A, Demjaha A, McGuire P, Mehta MA, Howes OD (2010) The test-retest reliability of 18 F-DOPA PET in assessing striatal and extrastriatal presynaptic dopaminergic function. Neuroimage 50:524–531
Eisenegger C, Knoch D, Ebstein RP, Gianotti LR, Sándor PS, Fehr E (2010) Dopamine receptor D4 polymorphism predicts the effect of L-DOPA on gambling behavior. Biol Psychiatry 67:702–706
Ekelund J, Slifstein M, Narendran R et al (2007) In vivo DA D1 receptor selectivity of NNC 112 and SCH 23390. Mol Imaging Biol 9:117–125
Enomoto K, Matsumoto N, Nakai S et al (2011) Dopamine neurons learn to encode the long-term value of multiple future rewards. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:15462–15467
Eriksen J, Rasmussen SG, Rasmussen TN et al (2009) Visualization of dopamine transporter trafficking in live neurons by use of fluorescent cocaine analogs. J Neurosci 29:6794–6808
Farde L, Hall H, Ehrin E, Sedvall G (1986) Quantitative analysis of D2 dopamine receptor binding in the living human brain by PET. Science 231:258–261
Finnema SJ, Halldin C, Bang-Andersen B, Gulyás B, Bundgaard C, Wikström HV, Farde L (2009) Dopamine D2/3 receptor occupancy of apomorphine in the nonhuman primate brain-a comparative PET study with [11C]raclopride and [11C]MNPA. Synapse 63:378–389
Finnema SJ, Bang-Andersen B, Wikström HV, Halldin C (2010) Current state of agonist radioligands for imaging of brain dopamine D2/D3 receptors in vivo with positron emission tomography. Curr Top Med Chem 10:1477–1498
Fiorillo CD, Tobler PN, Schultz W (2003) Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons. Science 299:1898–1902
Freedman SB, Patel S, Marwood R et al (1994) Expression and pharmacological characterization of the human D3 dopamine receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 268:417–426
Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Kilbourn MR et al (1996) Presynaptic monoaminergic vesicles in Parkinson’s disease and normal aging. Ann Neurol 40:873–884
Glenthoj BY, Mackeprang T, Svarer C et al (2006) Frontal dopamine D(2/3) receptor binding in drug-naive first-episode schizophrenic patients correlates with positive psychotic symptoms and gender. Biol Psychiatry 60:621–629
Goland R, Freeby M, Parsey R et al (2009) 11C-dihydrotetrabenazine PET of the pancreas in subjects with long-standing type 1 diabetes and in healthy controls. J Nucl Med 50:382–389
Guillot TS, Miller GW (2009) Protective actions of the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) in monoaminergic neurons. Mol Neurobiol 39:149–170
Guo N, Guo W, Kralikova M et al (2010) Impact of D2 receptor internalization on binding affinity of neuroimaging radiotracers. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:806–817
Halldin C, Farde L, Högberg T et al (1995) Carbon-11-FLB 457: a radioligand for extrastriatal D2 dopamine receptors. J Nucl Med 36:1275–1281
Hirvonen J, van Erp TG, Huttunen J et al (2006) Brain dopamine d1 receptors in twins discordant for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 163:1747–1753
Hirvonen J, Johansson J, Teräs M (2008) Measurement of striatal and extrastriatal dopamine transporter binding with high-resolution PET and [11C]PE2I: quantitative modeling and test-retest reproducibility. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 28:1059–1069
Högberg T (1993) The development of dopamine D2-receptor selective antagonists. Drug Des Discov 9:333–350
Holden JE, Doudet D, Endres CJ et al (1997) Graphical analysis of 6-fluoro-L-dopa trapping: effect of inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase. J Nucl Med 38:1568–1574
Howes OD, Kapur S (2009) The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III–the final common pathway. Schizophr Bull 35:549–562
Hu XS, Okamura N, Arai H (2000) 18F-fluorodopa PET study of striatal dopamine uptake in the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology 55:1575–1577
Ito H, Takahashi H, Arakawa R, Takano H, Suhara T (2008) Normal database of dopaminergic neurotransmission system in human brain measured by positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 39:555–565
Ito H, Kodaka F, Takahashi H et al (2011) Relation between presynaptic and postsynaptic dopaminergic functions measured by positron emission tomography: implication of dopaminergic tone. J Neurosci 31:7886–7890
Jucaite A, Fernell E, Halldin C, Forssberg H, Farde L (2005) Reduced midbrain dopamine transporter binding in male adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: association between striatal dopamine markers and motor hyperactivity. Biol Psychiatry 57:229–238
Jucaite A, Forssberg H, Karlsson P, Halldin C, Farde L (2010) Age-related reduction in dopamine D1 receptors in the human brain: from late childhood to adulthood, a positron emission tomography study. Neuroscience 167:104–110
Karlsson P, Farde L, Halldin C, Sedvall G (2002) PET study of D(1) dopamine receptor binding in neuroleptic-naive patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 159:761–767
Kessler RM, Ansari MS, de Paulis T et al (1991) High affinity dopamine D2 receptor radioligands. 1. Regional rat brain distribution of iodinated benzamides. J Nucl Med 32:1593–1600
Khan ZU, Mrzljak L, Gutierrez A, de la Calle A, Goldman-Rakic PS (1998) Prominence of the dopamine D2 short isoform in dopaminergic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:7731–7736
Kilbourn MR (1997) In vivo radiotracers for vesicular neurotransmitter transporters. Nucl Med Biol 24:615–619
Koopman KE, la Fleur SE, Fliers E, Serlie MJ, Booij J (2012) Assessing the optimal time-point for the measurement of extrastriatal serotonin transporter binding with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in healthy, male subjects. J Nucl Med 53:1087–1090
Kornhuber J, Brücke T, Angelberger P, Asenbaum S, Podreka I (1995) SPECT imaging of dopamine receptors with [123I]epidepride: characterization of uptake in the human brain. J Neural Transm Gen Sect 101:95–103
Kügler F, Sihver W, Ermert J et al (2011) Evaluation of 18 F-labeled benzodioxine piperazine-based dopamine D4 receptor ligands: lipophilicity as a determinate of nonspecific binding. J Med Chem 54:8343–8352
Kuikka JT, Baulieu JL, Hiltunen J et al (1998) Pharmacokinetics and dosimetry of iodine-123 labelled PE2I in humans, a radioligand for dopamine transporter imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 25:531–534
Kumakura Y, Cumming P (2009) PET studies of cerebral levodopa metabolism: a review of clinical findings and modeling approaches. Neuroscientist 15:635–650
Kumakura Y, Vernaleken I, Gründer G, Bartenstein P, Gjedde A, Cumming P (2005) PET studies of net blood–brain clearance of FDOPA to human brain: age-dependent decline of [18 F]fluorodopamine storage capacity. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25:807–819
Kumakura Y, Cumming P, Vernaleken I et al (2007) Elevated [18 F]fluorodopamine turnover in brain of patients with schizophrenia: an [18 F]fluorodopa/positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci 27:8080–8087
Kumakura Y, Vernaleken I, Buchholz HG et al (2010) Age-dependent decline of steady state dopamine storage capacity of human brain: an FDOPA PET study. Neurobiol Aging 31:447–463
Lacivita E, De Giorgio P, Lee IT et al (2010) Design, synthesis, radiolabeling, and in vivo evaluation of carbon-11 labeled N-[2-[4-(3-cyanopyridin-2-yl)piperazin-1-yl]ethyl]-3-methoxybenzamide, a potential positron emission tomography tracer for the dopamine D4 receptors. J Med Chem 53:7344–7355
Laruelle M (2000) Imaging synaptic neurotransmission with in vivo binding competition techniques: a critical review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 20:423–451
Laruelle M, Baldwin RM, Malison RT (1993) SPECT imaging of dopamine and serotonin. transporters with [123I]beta-CIT: pharmacological characterization of brain uptake in nonhuman primates. Synapse 13:295–309
Laruelle M, Abi-Dargham A, van Dyck CH et al (1995) SPECT imaging of striatal dopamine release after amphetamine challenge. J Nucl Med 36:1182–1190
Laruelle M, D’Souza CD, Baldwin RM et al (1997) Imaging D2 receptor occupancy by endogenous dopamine in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 17:162–174
Lavalaye J, Booij J, Reneman L, Habraken JB, van Royen EA (2000) Effect of age and gender on dopamine transporter imaging with [123I]FP-CIT SPET in healthy volunteers. Eur J Nucl Med 27:867–869
Laymon CM, Mason NS, Frankle WG et al (2009) Human biodistribution and dosimetry of the D2/3 agonist 11C-N-propylnorapomorphine (11C-NPA) determined from PET. J Nucl Med 50:814–817
Lewis SJ, Pavese N, Rivero-Bosch M et al (2012) Brain monoamine systems in multiple system atrophy: a positron emission tomography study. Neurobiol Dis 46:130–136
Lin KJ, Weng YH, Wey SP et al (2010) Whole-body biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 18 F-FP-(+)-DTBZ (18 F-AV-133): a novel vesicular monoamine transporter 2 imaging agent. J Nucl Med 51:1480–1485
Løkkegaard A, Werdelin LM, Friberg L (2002) Clinical impact of diagnostic SPET investigations with a dopamine re-uptake ligand. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:1623–1629
Ma SY, Ciliax BJ, Stebbins G et al (1999) Dopamine transporter-immunoreactive neurons decrease with age in the human substantia nigra. J Comp Neurol 409:25–37
Mamelak M, Chiu S, Mishra RK (1993) High- and low-affinity states of dopamine D1 receptors in schizophrenia. Eur J Pharmacol 233:175–176
Marazziti D, Baroni S, Masala I et al (2009) [(3)H]-YM-09151-2 binding sites in human brain postmortem. Neurochem Int 55:643–647
Martinez D, Slifstein M, Narendran R et al (2009) Dopamine D1 receptors in cocaine dependence measured with PET and the choice to self-administer cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:1774–1782
Martinez D, Carpenter KM, Liu F (2011) Imaging dopamine transmission in cocaine dependence: link between neurochemistry and response to treatment. Am J Psychiatry 168:634–641
McCauley PG, O’Boyle KM, Waddington JL (1995) Dopamine-induced reduction in the density of guanine nucleotide-sensitive D1 receptors in human postmortem brain in the absence of apparent D1: D2 interactions. Neuropharmacology 34:777–783
McKeith I, O’Brien J, Walker Z et al (2007) Sensitivity and specificity of dopamine transporter imaging with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies: a phase III, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 6:305–313
McNab F, Varrone A, Farde L et al (2009) Changes in cortical dopamine D1 receptor binding associated with cognitive training. Science 323:800–802
Moore RY, Whone AL, McGowan S, Brooks DJ (2003) Monoamine neuron innervation of the normal human brain: an 18 F-DOPA PET study. Brain Res 982:137–145
Morris G, Nevet A, Arkadir D, Vaadia E, Bergman H (2006) Midbrain dopamine neurons encode decisions for future action. Nat Neurosci 9:1057–1063
Mukherjee J, Yang ZY, Das MK, Brown T (1995) Fluorinated benzamide neuroleptics–III. Development of (S)-N-[(1-allyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-5-(3-[18 F]fluoropropyl)-2, 3-dimethoxybenzamide as an improved dopamine D-2 receptor tracer. Nucl Med Biol 22:283–296
Nakahara H, Itoh H, Kawagoe R, Takikawa Y, Hikosaka O (2004) Dopamine neurons can represent context-dependent prediction error. Neuron 41:269–280
Narendran R, Hwang DR, Slifstein M et al (2004) In vivo vulnerability to competition by endogenous dopamine: comparison of the D2 receptor agonist radiotracer (−)-N-[11C]propyl-norapomorphine ([11C]NPA) with the D2 receptor antagonist radiotracer [11C]-raclopride. Synapse 52:188–208
Narendran R, Mason NS, Laymon CM et al (2010) A comparative evaluation of the dopamine D2/3 agonist radiotracer [11C](−)-N-propyl-norapomorphine and antagonist [11C]raclopride to measure amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the human striatum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 333:533–539
Neumeyer JL, Gao YG, Kula NS, Baldessarini RJ (1990) Synthesis and dopamine receptor affinity of (R)-(−)-2-fluoro-N-n-propylnorapomorphine: a highly potent and selective dopamine D2 agonist. J Med Chem 33:3122–3124
Nordström AL, Farde L, Nyberg S, Karlsson P, Halldin C, Sedvall G (1995) D1, D2, and 5-HT2 receptor occupancy in relation to clozapine serum concentration: a PET study of schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry 152:1444–1449
Nurmi E, Bergman J, Eskola O, Solin O, Vahlberg T, Sonninen P, Rinne JO (2003) Progression of dopaminergic hypofunction in striatal subregions in Parkinson’s disease using [18F]CFT PET. Synapse 48:109–115
Nyberg S, Eriksson B, Oxenstierna G, Halldin C, Farde L (1999) Suggested minimal effective dose of risperidone based on PET-measured D2 and 5-HT2A receptor occupancy in schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry 156:869–875
Oh M, Kim JS, Kim JY et al (2012) Subregional patterns of preferential striatal dopamine transporter loss differ in Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple-system atrophy. J Nucl Med 53:399–406
Okamura N, Villemagne VL, Drago J et al (2010) In vivo measurement of vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 density in Parkinson disease with 18 F-AV-133. 2010. J Nucl Med 51:223–228
Otsuka T, Ito H, Halldin C et al (2009) Quantitative PET analysis of the dopamine D2 receptor agonist radioligand 11C-(R)-2-CH3O-N-n-propylnorapomorphine in the human brain. J Nucl Med 50:703–710
Palner M, McCormick P, Parkes J, Knudsen GM, Wilson AA (2010) Systemic catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibition enables the D1 agonist radiotracer R-[11C]SKF 82957. Nucl Med Biol 37:837–843
Pavese N, Simpson BS, Metta V, Ramlackhansingh A, Chaudhuri KR, Brooks DJ (2012) [18 F]FDOPA uptake in the raphe nuclei complex reflects serotonin transporter availability. A combined [18 F]FDOPA and [11C]DASB PET study in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage 59:1080–1084
Ramamoorthy S, Shippenberg TS, Jayanthi LD (2011) Regulation of monoamine transporters: role of transporter phosphorylation. Pharmacol Ther 129:220–238
Rani M, Kanungo MS (2006) Expression of D2 dopamine receptor in the mouse brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 344:981–986
Richfield EK, Penney JB, Young AB (1989) Anatomical and affinity state comparisons between dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the rat central nervous system. Neuroscience 30:767–777
Rinne JO, Laine M, Kaasinen V, Norvasuo-Heilä MK, Någren K, Helenius H (2002) Striatal dopamine transporter and extrapyramidal symptoms in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 58:1489–1493
Rivera A, Cuéllar B, Girón FJ, Grandy DK, de la Calle A, Moratalla R (2002) Dopamine D4 receptors are heterogeneously distributed in the striosomes/matrix compartments of the striatum. J Neurochem 80:219–229
Sasaki T, Ito H, Kimura Y et al (2012) Quantification of dopamine transporter in human brain using PET with 18 F-FE-PE2I. J Nucl Med 53:1065–1073
Schlagenhauf F, Rapp MA, Huys QJ et al (2013) Ventral striatal prediction error signaling is associated with dopamine synthesis capacity and fluid intelligence. Hum Brain Mapp 34:1490–1499
Scott DJ, Stohler CS, Koeppe RA, Zubieta JK (2007) Time-course of change in [11C]carfentanil and [11C]raclopride binding potential after a nonpharmacological challenge. Synapse 61:707–714
Seeman P, Waanabe M, Grigoriadis D et al (1985) Dopamine D2 receptor binding sites for agonists. A tetrahedral model. Mol Pharmacol 28:391–399
Shotbolt P, Tziortzi AC, Searle GE et al (2012) Within-subject comparison of [11C]-(+)-PHNO and [11C]raclopride sensitivity to acute amphetamine challenge in healthy humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32:127–136
Sibley DR, De Lean A, Creese I (1982) Anterior pituitary dopamine receptors. Demonstration of interconvertible high and low affinity states of the D-2 dopamine receptor. J Biol Chem 257:6351–6361
Skinbjerg M, Liow JS, Seneca N et al (2010) D2 dopamine receptor internalization prolongs the decrease of radioligand binding after amphetamine: a PET study in a receptor internalization-deficient mouse model. Neuroimage 50:1402–1407
Skinbjerg M, Sibley DR, Javitch JA, Abi-Dargham A (2012) Imaging the high-affinity state of the dopamine D2 receptor in vivo: fact or fiction? Biochem Pharmacol 83:193–198
Slifstein M, Kolachana B, Simpson EH et al (2008) COMT genotype predicts cortical-limbic D1 receptor availability measured with [11C]NNC112 and PET. Mol Psychiatry 13:821–827
Smith TF (2010) Meta-analysis of the heterogeneity in association of DRD4 7-repeat allele and AD/HD: stronger association with AD/HD combined type. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 153B:1189–1199
Spooren A, Rondou P, Debowska K et al (2010) Resistance of the dopamine D4 receptor to agonist-induced internalization and degradation. Cell Signal 22:600–609
Stoof JC, Kebabian JW (1981) Opposing roles for D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors in efflux of cyclic AMP from rat neostriatum. Nature 294:366–368
Strange PG (1993) New insights into dopamine receptors in the central nervous system. Neurochem Int 22:223–236
Sunahara RK, Guan HC, O’Dowd BF et al (1991) Cloning of the gene for a human dopamine D5 receptor with higher affinity for dopamine than D1. Nature 350:614–619
Takahashi H, Takano H, Kodaka F et al (2010) Contribution of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors to amygdala activity in human. J Neurosci 30:3043–3047
Troiano AR, Schulzer M, de la Fuente-Fernandez R et al (2010) Dopamine transporter PET in normal aging: dopamine transporter decline and its possible role in preservation of motor function. Synapse 64:146–151
Tuppurainen H, Kuikka JT, Viinamäki H, Husso M, Tiihonen J (2010) Extrapyramidal side-effects and dopamine D2/3 receptor binding in substantia nigra. Nord J Psychiatry 64:233–238
Tziortzi AC, Searle GE, Tzimopoulou S et al (2011) Imaging dopamine receptors in humans with [11C]-(+)-PHNO: dissection of D3 signal and anatomy. Neuroimage 54:264–277
van de Giessen E, de Win MM, Tanck MW, van den Brink W, Baas F, Booij J (2009) Striatal dopamine transporter availability associated with polymorphisms in the dopamine transporter gene SLC6A3. J Nucl Med 50:45–52
van Dyck CH, Malison RT, Jacobsen LK et al (2005) Increased dopamine transporter availability associated with the 9-repeat allele of the SLC6A3 gene. J Nucl Med 46:745–751
Van Tol HHM, Bunzow JR, Guan HC et al (1991) Cloning of the gene for a human D4 receptor with high affinity for the antipsychotic clozapine. Nature 350:610–614
van Vliet L, Rodenhuis N, Dijkstra D et al (2000) Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of thiopyran analogues of the dopamine D3 receptor-selective agonist (4aR,10bR)-(þ)-trans-3,4,4a,10b-tetrahydro-4-n-propyl-2H,5H-[1]benzopropyno[4,3-b]-1,4-oxazin-9-ol (PD128907). J Med Chem 43:2871–2882
van Wieringen J-P, Booij J, Shalgunov V et al (2013) Agonist high- and low-affinity states of dopamine D2 receptors: methods of detection and clinical implications. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 386:135–154
Varrone A, Halldin C (2012a) New developments of dopaminergic imaging in Parkinson’s disease. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 56:68–82
Varrone A, Halldin C (2012b) Molecular imaging of the dopamine transporter. J Nucl Med 51:1331–1334
Varrone A, Fujita M, Verhoeff NP et al (2000) Test-retest reproducibility of extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptor imaging with [123I]epidepride SPECT in humans. J Nucl Med 41:1343–1451
Varrone A, Marek KL, Jennings D, Innis RB, Seibyl JP (2001) [123I]beta-CIT SPECT imaging demonstrates reduced density of striatal dopamine transporters in Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy. Mov Disord 16:1023–1032
Varrone A, Steiger C, Schou M et al (2009) In vitro autoradiography and in vivo evaluation in cynomolgus monkey of [18 F]FE-PE2I, a new dopamine transporter PET radioligand. Synapse 63:871–880
Verhoeff NP, Kapucu O, Sokole-Busemann E, van Royen EA, Janssen AG (1993) Estimation of dopamine D2 receptor binding potential in the striatum with iodine-123-IBZM SPECT: technical and interobserver variability. J Nucl Med 34:2076–2084
Videbaek C, Toska K, Scheideler MA, Paulson OB, Moos Knudsen G (2000) SPECT tracer [123I]IBZM has similar affinity to dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. Synapse 38:338–342
Villemagne VL, Okamura N, Pejoska S et al (2011) In vivo assessment of vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 in dementia with lewy bodies and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 68:905–912
Virostko J, Henske J, Vinet L et al (2011) Multimodal image coregistration and inducible selective cell ablation to evaluate imaging ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:20719–20724
Visser I, Lavini C, Booij J et al (2008) Cerebral impairment in chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy. Ann Neurol 63:572–580
Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Gatley SJ, Logan J, Wang GJ, Ding YS, Dewey S (1996) PET evaluation of the dopamine system of the human brain. J Nucl Med 37:1242–1256
Wang JL, Oya S, Parhi AK et al (2010) In vivo studies of the SERT-selective [18 F]FPBM and VMAT2-selective [18 F]AV-133 radiotracers in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Nucl Med Biol 37:479–486
Willeit M, Ginovart N, Kapur S et al (2006) High-affinity states of human brain dopamine D2/3 receptors imaged by the agonist [11C]-(+)-PHNO. Biol Psychiatry 59:389–394
Yagi S, Yoshikawa E, Futatsubashi M et al (2010) Progression from unilateral to bilateral parkinsonism in early Parkinson disease: implication of mesocortical dopamine dysfunction by PET. J Nucl Med 51:1250–1257
Zahniser, Molinoff (1978) Effect of guanine nucleotides on striatal dopamine receptors. Nature 275:453–455
Ziebell M, Holm-Hansen S, Thomsen G et al (2010) Serotonin transporters in dopamine transporter imaging: a head-to-head comparison of dopamine transporter SPECT radioligands 123I-FP-CIT and 123I-PE2I. J Nucl Med 51:1885–1891
Ziebell M, Andersen BB, Thomsen G et al (2012) Predictive value of dopamine transporter SPECT imaging with [123I]PE2I in patients with subtle parkinsonian symptoms. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:242–250
Zijlstra F, Booij J, van den Brink W, Franken IH (2008) Striatal dopamine D2 receptor binding and dopamine release during cue-elicited craving in recently abstinent opiate-dependent males. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 18:262–270
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Booij, J., van Wieringen, JP., van de Giessen, E., Knol, R.J.J., Finnema, S.J. (2014). PET and SPECT Imaging of the Central Dopamine System in Humans. In: Dierckx, R., Otte, A., de Vries, E., van Waarde, A., Luiten, P. (eds) PET and SPECT of Neurobiological Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-42014-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-42014-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-42013-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-42014-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)