Zusammenfassung
Dieses Kapitel vermittelt folgende Lernziele: Wissen, wie Population und Stichprobe definiert sind. Das Konzept der Repräsentativität erläutern und problematisieren können. Die wichtigsten qualitativen Stichprobenarten kennen. Die wichtigsten quantitativen Stichprobenarten kennen. Die Vor- und Nachteile probabilistischer und nicht-probabilistischer Stichproben abwägen können.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Baker, R., Brick, J. M., Bates, N. A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., et al. (2013). Report of the AAPOR Task Force on non-probability sampling: American Association for Public Opinion Research AAPOR. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://www.aapor.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Reports1&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=5963.
Behnke, J. (2005). Lassen sich Signifikanztests auf Vollerhebungen anwenden? Einige essayistische Anmerkungen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 46(1), 2–15.
Berland, M. A. & Thomas, K. R. (1991). Psychosocial issues following severe head injury in adolescence: Individual and family perceptions. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35(1), 5–22.
Billeter, E. P. (1970). Grundlagen der repräsentativen Statistik. Wien: Springer.
Bjorkman, M. & Malterud, K. (2009). Lesbian women’s experiences with health care: A qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 27(4), 238–243.
Bortz, J., Lienert, G. A., & Boehnke, K. (2008). Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik (3rd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
Bortz, J. & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (7th. ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Broscheid, A. & Geschwend, T. (2005). Zur statistischen Analyse von Vollerhebungen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 46(1), 16–26.
Chersich, M. F., Luchters, S. M. F., Malonza, I. M., Mwarogo, P., King’ola, N., & Temmerman, M. (2007). Heavy episodic drinking among Kenyan female sex workers is associated with unsafe sex, sexual violence and sexually transmitted infections. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 18(11), 764–769.
Christopher, F. S., Pflieger, J. C., Canary, D. J., Guerrero, L. K., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2008). Targeted neighborhood sampling: A new approach for recruiting abusive couples. Journal of Family Violence, 23(2), 89–100.
Diekmann, A. (2005). Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.
DMS Research. (2008). A Deep Dive into the River – Comparing Multiple Streams of River Respondents. Retrieved September 9, 2013, from http://www.usamp.com/objects/pdf/pr/DMS/DMS_River_Deep_Dive_White_Paper.pdf.
Drake, F. (2011). Protesting mobile phone masts: Risk, neoliberalism, and governmentality. Science, Technology and Human Values, 36(4), 522–548.
Edgington, E. & Onghena, P. (2007). Randomization Tests (4th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2013). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden (3rd ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.
Flick, U. (1996). Psychologie des technisierten Alltags – Soziale Konstruktion und Repräsentation technischen Wandels in verschiedenen kulturellen Kontexten. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Flick, U. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung (3rd ed.). Reinbeck: Rowohlt.
Freedman, D., Pisani, R., & Purves, R. (1978). Statisics. New York: Norton.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory (8th ed.). Chicago: Aldine.
Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowballsampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170.
Goscinny, R. & Sempé, J.-J. (1976). Der kleine Nick und die Mädchen. Zürich: Diogenes.
Hager, W. (2013). The statistical theories of Fisher and of Neyman and Pearson: A methodological perspective. Theory and Psychology, 23(2), 251–270.
Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199.
Higginbottom, G. M. A. (2004). Sampling issues in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 12(1), 7–19.
Jandura, G., Jandura, O., & Kuhlmann, C. (2005). Stichprobenziehung in der Inhaltsanalyse. Gegen den Mythos der künstlichen Woche. In V. Gehrau, B. Fretwurst, B. Krause & G. Daschmann (Hrsg.), Auswahlverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 71–116). Köln: Halem.
Knowles, A. (2011). Resilience among japanese atomic bomb survivors. International Nursing Review, 58(1), 54–60.
Kozak, M. (2005). Finite and infinite populations in biological statistics: Should we distinguish them? The Journal of American Science 4(1), 59–62.
Lam, W. K. K., Cance, J. D., Eke, A. N., Fishbein, D. H., Hawkins, S. R., & Williams, J. C. (2007). Children of African-American mothers who use crack cocaine: Parenting influences on youth substance use. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(8), 877–887.
Legault, A. & Ducharme, F. (2009). Advocating for a parnet with dementia in a long-term care facility: The process experienced by daughters. Journal of Family Nursing, 15(2), 198–219.
Lipsmeier, G. (1999). Standard oder Fehler? Einige Eigenschaften von Schätzungsverfahren bei komplexen Stichprobenplänen und aktuelle Lösungsansätze. ZA-Information, 44, 96–117.
Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–525.
Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Peterson, J. A., Schacht Reisinger, H., Schwartz, R. P., Mitchell, S. G., Kelly, S. M., Brown, B. S., et al. (2008). Targeted sampling in drug abuse research: A review and case study. Field Methods, 20(2), 155–170.
Safman, R. M. & Sobal, J. (2004). Qualitative sample extensiveness in health education research. Health Education and Behavior, 31(1), 9–21.
Scheuch, E. K. (1974) Auswahlverfahren in der Sozialforschung. Handbuch der empirischen Sozialforschung, Bd. 3a Grundlegende Methoden und Techniken. Stuttgart: Enke.
Schnell, R., Hill, P. B., & Esser, E. (2008). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. München: Oldenbourg.
The Rand Corporation. (1955). A million random digits with 100 000 normal deviates. Glencoe: Free Press.
Turgeman-Goldschmidt, O. (2005). Hackers’ Accounts: Hacking as a Social Entertainment. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 8–23.
Watters, J. K. & Biernacki, P. (1989). Targeted sampling: Options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36(4), 416–430.
Wejnert, C. & Heckathorn, D. D. (2008). Web-based network sampling: Efficiency and efficacy of respondent-driven sampling for online research. Sociological Methods and Research, 37(1), 105–134.
Westermann, R. (2000). Wissenschaftstheorie und Experimentalmethodik. Ein Lehrbuch zur psychologischen Methodenlehre. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Winterich, J. A., Quandt, S. A., Grzywacz, J. G., Clark, P. E., Miller, D. P., Acuña, J., et al. (2009). Masculinity and the body: How African American and white men experience cancer screening exams involving the rectum. American Journal of Men’s Health, 3(4), 300–309.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Döring, N., Bortz, J. (2016). Stichprobenziehung. In: Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41088-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41089-5
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)