Abstract
Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are relatively rare, acquired, pathologic shunts between dural arteries and dural venous sinuses, meningeal veins, or cortical veins. Signs and symptoms are highly variable and depend upon several factors including fistula location, duration of disease, and venous drainage pattern. The most clinically important feature for classification is venous drainage pattern. Management decisions require a multidisciplinary approach involving discussions among interventional neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, and neurologists and depend on the type of lesion, including location and angiographic risk strata, assessment of clinical presentation, and patient status (age, comorbidities). Treatment should be pursued for all lesions with cortical venous drainage or intolerable symptoms.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Introduction
Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are acquired, pathologic shunts between dural arteries and dural venous sinuses, meningeal veins, or cortical veins. The artery-to-vein connection is located within the leaflets of the dura mater and lacks a distinctive vascular nidus. By contrast, parenchymal arteriovenous malformations occur within the brain parenchyma and usually contain a vascular nidus. DAVFs are relatively rare accounting for 10–15 % of intracranial arteriovenous shunts and representing 6 % of supratentorial and 35 % of infratentorial vascular malformations (Newton and Cronqvist 1969; Al-Shahi et al. 2003; Chaudhary et al. 1982). Signs and symptoms are highly variable and depend upon several factors including fistula location, duration of disease, and venous drainage pattern. Symptoms range from pulse-synchronous tinnitus and exophthalmos to cranial nerve deficits, cognitive impairment, venous infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and even death. DAVFs occur most commonly in the transverse/sigmoid and cavernous sinuses. The decision to treat, as well as the mode of treatment, should be based on the angiographic features of the lesion, including the venous drainage pattern, location of the DAVF, severity of presenting symptoms, the morbidity and mortality rate(s) of the procedure(s) under consideration, and general medical condition of the patient (Brown et al. 1994; Daniels et al. 2013; Natarajan et al. 2010; Hu et al. 2011).
Etiology/Pathophysiology
Although the pathogenesis of DAVFs is still a matter of debate, multiple associations have been described in the literature including head trauma, surgery, infection, hormonal factors, hypercoagulable states (e.g., protein S deficiency, prothrombin mutation, and factor V Leiden), and sinus thrombosis (Kawaguchi et al. 2002; Field et al. 2002; Hashimoto et al. 1998; Yoshimura et al. 1995; Chung et al. 2002; Nabors et al. 1987; Chaudhary et al. 1982; Nishio et al. 2002; Yassari et al. 2002; Witt et al. 1999; Terada et al. 1998; Singh et al. 2001). The association between sinus thrombosis and DAVFs has long been recognized, although the pathogenesis and evolution from thrombosis to fistula development are still not completely understood.
Two etiologic hypotheses regarding the association between sinus thrombosis and DAVFs have been proposed. The first theory suggests that venous hypertension and ischemia, resulting from sinus thrombosis/sinus outflow obstruction, induces the pathologic enlargement of physiologic but quiescent, arteriovenous shunts (between meningeal arteries and dural venous sinuses) within the dura mater to facilitate development of collateral blood flow (Nabors et al. 1987; Kerber and Newton 1973). These “microshunts” may continue to grow in patients with genetic predisposition or under the influence of other unknown factors and eventually develop into DAVFs. The second theory postulates that DAVFs are the result of vascular neogenesis within the dura mater resulting from the release of angiogenic growth factors. Elevated levels of both vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor have been found in the sinus wall and perivascular connective tissues of DAVFs in both humans and experimental rat models. These angiogenic factors can be either directly produced by inflammatory cells in organizing thrombus or indirectly induced by ischemia resulting from increased intraluminal venous pressure (Malek et al. 2000; Uranishi et al. 1999; Tirakotai et al. 2005; Lawton et al. 1997; Herman et al. 1995; Terada et al. 1994, 1996).
Classification
Over the last several decades, numerous classification schemes have been proposed in order to help define the natural history of DAVFs. Initial reports focused on the anatomical location as the key discriminating feature (Aminoff 1973). Although lesion location correlates well with symptomatology, it does not necessarily predict natural history, as DAVFs in any location can exhibit aggressive neurological behavior. It was soon recognized that the venous drainage pattern determines a DAVFs clinical behavior and was the most clinically important feature for classification (Brown et al. 1994; Awad et al. 1990; Castaigne et al. 1976; Houser et al. 1972).
Understanding this, Djindian and Merland developed a classification scheme dividing DAVFs into four types based on venous drainage pattern. Type I lesions demonstrate immediate drainage into a dural sinus or meningeal vein and are considered relatively benign. Type II lesions demonstrate initial drainage into a sinus and retrograde flow into other sinuses or cortical veins. Type III lesions demonstrate initial drainage into a cortical vein, and type IV lesions have drainage into a cortical vein with venous ectasia. Type II–IV lesions show increased risk of neurological symptoms and hemorrhage (Djindjian and Merland 1978).
Lalwani et al. proposed a system for grading DAVFs of the transverse/sigmoid sinus based on the severity of venous restrictive disease, as obstruction of venous outflow increases the risk of intracranial hemorrhage due to retrograde flow via cortical veins. Four grades of venous restrictive disease are defined. Critical factors include the presence or absence of cortical venous drainage and antegrade venous drainage through the ipsilateral sigmoid sinus and jugular bulb. Grade 1 lesions are characterized by normal antegrade venous drainage without venous restriction or cortical venous drainage. Grade 2 lesions demonstrate antegrade venous drainage and retrograde venous flow through the transverse sinus to the torcular Herophili, with or without cortical venous drainage. Grade 3 lesions have retrograde and cortical venous drainage without antegrade flow through the sigmoid sinus. Grade 4 disease is characterized by cortical venous drainage only, due to severe antegrade and retrograde venous obstruction in the transverse and sigmoid sinuses. Their preliminary study demonstrated that patients with grades 1 and 2 lesions typically had a benign clinical presentation, primarily pulsatile tinnitus and headache, while patients with grade 3 and grade 4 lesions had more ominous clinical presentations, typically visual symptoms and intracranial hemorrhage (Lalwani et al. 1993).
The Cognard classification system uses Djindian’s scheme as a base but expands upon it to include five main types and several subtypes of venous drainage. Classifications are based on the direction of dural sinus drainage, the presence or absence of cortical venous drainage, and venous outflow architecture. Type I lesions drain into a main sinus and demonstrate antegrade flow. Type II lesions drain into a main sinus but demonstrate retrograde flow into either a main sinus (IIa), cortical veins (IIb), or both (IIa + b). Type III lesions show direct cortical venous drainage without venous ectasia. Type IV lesions have direct cortical venous drainage with venous ectasia. Type V lesions are intracranial DAVFs that drain into spinal perimedullary veins. In their series of 205 patients, only one of 84 patients with a type I DAVF had severe neurological symptoms; 83 patients had a benign course. In type II lesions, reflux into the sinus induced intracranial hypertension in 20 % of cases, and reflux into cortical veins induced hemorrhage in 10 %. Forty percent of patients with type III lesions had intracranial hemorrhage, and the presence of venous ectasia (type IV) increased the risk to 65 %. Type V lesions produced progressive myelopathy in 50 % of cases (Cognard et al. 1995).
The Borden classification system divides DAVFs into three types based on the site of venous drainage (dural sinus and/or cortical vein) and the presence or absence of cortical venous drainage. Type I lesions drain directly into dural venous sinuses or meningeal veins. Type II fistulas drain into dural sinuses or meningeal veins but also have retrograde drainage into subarachnoid veins. Type III lesions drain into subarachnoid veins and do not have dural sinus or meningeal venous drainage. The Borden classification scheme further subclassifies DAVFs as either single-hole or multiple-hole lesions (Borden et al. 1995; Davies et al. 1996).
More recent classification schemes have been proposed that grade DAVFs through a combination of angiographic and clinical features. Zipfel et al. developed a classification scheme recognizing that DAVFs with high-risk angiographic features that present with intracerebral hemorrhage or nonhemorrhagic neurological deficits harbor more risk for future injury compared with DAVFs with high-risk features that have a benign clinical presentation. Their classification system divides DAVFs into three main types, with types 2 and 3 each having two subtypes depending on whether or not they present with symptomatic cortical venous drainage. A stepwise increase in neurological risk is noted between type 1 lesions and type 3 lesions (Zipfel et al. 2009).
The Borden and Cognard classification schemes , both of which highlight the importance of venous drainage patterns (particularly cortical venous drainage), are the two most widely used and clinically accepted classification schemes for DAVFs (Cognard et al. 1995; Borden et al. 1995; Davies et al. 1996; Table 1). In both classification schemes, the presence of cortical venous reflux is considered an aggressive feature denoting a high-risk lesion with an annual mortality rate of 10.4 % and an annual risk of hemorrhage and nonhemorrhagic neurological deficit of 8.1 % and 6.9 %, respectively (van Dijk et al. 2002). Regardless of the classification scheme one chooses to utilize, it is extremely important to be aware that the venous drainage patterns of DAVFs are dynamic and lower-grade lesions can progress to higher grades over time (Satomi et al. 2002; Cognard et al. 1997). Should a patient’s symptoms change, reevaluation and follow-up imaging are warranted (Shah et al. 2012).
Fistulas involving the cavernous sinus have been traditionally divided into four types based on their arterial supply (Barrow et al. 1985). Type B DAVFs involve meningeal branches of the internal carotid artery; type C lesions are shunts between meningeal branches of the external carotid artery and the cavernous sinus; type D DAVFs are dural shunts between meningeal branches of both the internal and external carotid arteries and the cavernous sinus. Type A lesions, also called “direct” carotid-cavernous fistulas, are direct high-flow shunts between the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus.
Location/Anatomy
The transverse/sigmoid sinuses are the most common sites for DAVFs. Patients typically present with pulse-synchronous tinnitus and headaches, although roughly 10 % will present with acute intracranial hemorrhage (Kirsch et al. 2009; Fig. 1). Spontaneous regression has been reported but is relatively rare (Luciani et al. 2001). The arterial supply to transverse/sigmoid DAVFs is typically from transmastoid branches of the occipital artery, branches of the middle meningeal artery, posterior auricular artery, meningeal branches of the ascending pharyngeal artery, posterior meningeal branches of the ipsilateral vertebral artery, and tentorial branches of the meningohypophyseal trunk (Halbach et al. 1987a). Occasionally, the transverse sinus can be occluded on both ends, resulting in a trapped sinus with exclusive cortical venous drainage. When planning endovascular treatment, particular attention must be paid to direction of flow within the vein of Labbe, as well as its point of insertion into the transverse/sigmoid sinuses. Occlusion at its origin is only safely accomplished if flow is retrograde. If flow is antegrade, occlusion can exacerbate venous hypertension, leading to stroke with aphasia or hemorrhage (Santillan et al. 2013; Fig. 2).
Following the transverse/sigmoid sinus, the cavernous sinus is the next most common site of DAVFs. Common clinical signs and symptoms include chemosis, proptosis, arterialized conjunctival veins, ophthalmoparesis, retro-orbital pain, elevated intraocular pressure, and diminished visual acuity. Cavernous sinus DAVFs frequently receive blood supply from the meningohypophyseal trunk, the inferolateral trunk, McConnell’s capsular arteries, the middle and accessory meningeal arteries, the ascending pharyngeal artery, and the arteries of the foramen rotundum and pterygoid canal (Meyers et al. 2002). Supply from the contralateral carotid artery may also occur. Venous drainage is highly variable and depends on several factors including the preexisting venous anatomy, fistula flow rate, and duration of disease (Stiebel-Kalish et al. 2002; Suh et al. 2005).
Superior sagittal sinus DAVFs are relatively rare representing approximately 10 % of cranial fistulae (Fig. 3). They typically present with intracranial hemorrhage or progressive neurological deficits; bleeding rates of up to 40 % have been reported (Kurl et al. 1996; Bertalanffy et al. 2001). Lesions in this location usually involve the mid to posterior third of the superior sagittal sinus and draw their arterial supply from branches of the bilateral middle meningeal arteries. Small contributions from the falcine branches of the ophthalmic arteries and the posterior meningeal arteries can also be seen. Because of their unique midline location, multiple arterial feeders, and cortical venous drainage, superior sagittal sinus DAVFs often require aggressive forms of therapy (Halbach et al. 1988).
First reported by DAVFs of the anterior cranial fossa (ethmoidal) represent a distinct subgroup of DAVFs with a high incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (Fig. 4). Relatively rare, they constitute less than 10 % of all DAVFs (Halbach et al. 1990; Martin et al. 1990; Gliemroth et al. 1999; Lv et al. 2008). They are more common in men, in contrast to the distribution in other locations of DAVFs. Anterior cranial fossa DAVFs almost universally involve the dura in the region of the cribriform plate and the anterior falx. The principal arterial supply comes from the ipsilateral anterior and posterior ethmoidal arteries of the ophthalmic arteries. Additional supply through anastomoses with the contralateral anterior ethmoidal artery as well as ethmoidal branches of the internal maxillary artery, middle meningeal artery, and superficial temporal artery may also exist (Martin et al. 1990; Gliemroth et al. 1999; Lv et al. 2008). Drainage is primarily into pial veins of the anterior frontal lobe which ultimately drain into the superior sagittal sinus or cavernous sinus. Large venous aneurysms (or varices) are an extremely common finding and appear to be the source of hemorrhage (Martin et al. 1990; Gliemroth et al. 1999). Hemorrhage, with reported rates as high as 91 %, may be massive and life threatening. As a result, anterior cranial fossa DAVFs should be treated even if asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis (Reul et al. 1993; Lawton et al. 1999).
Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas represent another unique subset of intracranial DAVFs. These fistulas occur in the dura of the tentorium and its attachments rather than in the sinus wall. Like ethmoidal DAVFs, tentorial DAVFs are relatively rare, accounting for 4–8 % of intracranial fistulae. They are associated with an aggressive natural history, often presenting with hemorrhage or progressive neurological deficits (Zhou et al. 2007; Khan et al. 2009). Several reports have demonstrated tentorial DAVFs manifesting with rapidly progressive myelopathy because of spinal perimedullary venous drainage (Khan et al. 2009; Wrobel et al. 1988). Arterial supply is usually multiple with contributions from the occipital artery, posterior meningeal artery, marginal tentorial artery, middle meningeal artery, meningeal branches of pial arteries, and branches of the external carotid artery. Bilateral internal and external carotid and vertebral angiography should be performed in all patients with tentorial DAVFs to elucidate the potentially complex arterial supply (Khan et al. 2009). Venous drainage is usually through the superior petrosal sinus or through the pontine, perimesencephalic, and basal veins. Most tentorial DAVFs are Borden type II or III lesions because of the presence of retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage (Grisoli et al. 1984; Tomak et al. 2003; Byrne and Garcia 2013).
Diagnostic Imaging
Although cross-sectional imaging modalities are neither sensitive nor specific for the detection and risk stratification of DAVFs, noninvasive imaging should be the initial study of choice, and pertinent findings must be recognized. Noncontrast head CT can demonstrate areas of hypodensity representing edema or venous ischemia, as well as acute/subacute intracranial hemorrhage. Enlarged pial veins can sometimes be identified as hyperdense tubular structures. Venous varices and sinus thrombosis may also be detected. Proptosis, increased attenuation of intraorbital fat, extraocular muscle enlargement, superior ophthalmic vein enlargement, and enlargement of the cavernous sinus can be seen on noncontrast CT in patients with cavernous sinus DAVFs. Contrast-enhanced head CT can show enhancement of refluxing cortical veins. CT angiography has been shown to demonstrate the feeding artery, the pattern of venous drainage, and aid localization in all types and grades of DAVFs (Lee et al. 2010; Koc et al. 2013; Fig. 5). It is also helpful in treatment planning by defining the DAVF relative to surrounding brain and skull anatomy. Benign DAVFs, those without cortical venous reflux, are nearly always occult on noncontrast head CT.
On MR imaging, enlarged pial vessels, occluded dural sinuses, and cerebral and cerebellar white matter edema may be found in the presence of cortical venous reflux and venous hypertension (Willinsky et al. 1994; Fig. 6). Enhancement along the peripheral margins of white matter T2 hyperintensity has also been reported (Lee et al. 2003). With time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography, early venous filling of a sinus or cortical vein was found to be reliable signs in detecting DAVFs, in both diagnostic and follow-up imaging (Meckel et al. 2007). However, this same technique is less effective at detecting mild venous reflux and delineation of small feeding arteries compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Additionally, with a reported detection rate of only 50 %, and a poor negative predictive value, MR angiography cannot substitute for high-quality DSA (Cohen et al. 2009; Koenigsberg 1996).
DSA remains the gold standard for the diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment planning for DAVFs. Evaluation should include selective injections of the internal carotid arteries, external carotid arteries, and vertebral arteries. When the suspected lesion is at the craniocervical junction, selective injections of the thyrocervical and costocervical arteries should be performed. Superselective injections are often required to adequately observe the arterial supply and delineate any anastomoses between the arterial feeders and arteries of the brain, orbit, or cranial nerves. High frame rate, magnified, and oblique views should be obtained to document the exact anatomy of each fistula. Meticulous visualization of the venous system is critical for planning treatment. The presence or absence of cortical venous reflux must be documented. Subtle findings, including pial or medullary collateral veins, focal regions of delayed circulation, and venous rerouting to the orbit or to transosseous veins, must be sought (Willinsky et al. 1999). Tortuous, dilated veins seen over the surface of the brain indicate long-standing venous hypertension. This so called “pseudophlebitic” pattern tends to be associated with an aggressive presentation and retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage (Willinsky et al. 1999).
Clinical Presentation
The clinical presentation of DAVFs is highly variable, depending on intracranial location, duration of disease, and pattern of venous drainage (Cognard et al. 1995; Hurst et al. 1998; Lucas Cde and Zabramski 2007). The signs and symptoms can change as the disease progresses. DAVFs have been reported to occur at any age, although the majority present in the fifth and sixth decades of life. They are slightly more common in women. They tend to present with more severe symptoms in men, who have a greater number of DAVFs in locations with cortical venous drainage. Patient age, cause of DAVF, and arterial characteristics do not correlate with symptomatology (Cognard et al. 1995). When a patient presents with an unusual constellation of neurological signs and symptoms, DAVF should be included in the differential diagnosis even in the face of normal noninvasive imaging. Additionally, DAVFs should be considered in patients without an obvious cause of intracerebral hemorrhage or who present with signs and symptoms of venous hypertension.
Signs and symptoms of DAVFs can be divided into those that are “benign,” and those that are “aggressive.” Benign clinical features include pulse-synchronous tinnitus and orbital symptoms including ophthalmoplegia, proptosis, chemosis, and retro-orbital pain. Benign signs and symptoms are typically seen in DAVFs that lack cortical venous drainage. Thus, Borden type I and Cognard types I and IIa DAVFs are considered benign lesions that almost never present with grave pathology (Awad et al. 1990; Fermand et al. 1987; Davies et al. 1997). The most common symptom, pulse-synchronous tinnitus results from turbulent blood flow through a venous sinus near the auditory apparatus in the petrous bone. It may be possible for the physician to appreciate a bruit in the retroauricular or periorbital region on physical exam. Cavernous sinus fistulas characteristically present with proptosis, chemosis, and ophthalmoparesis (Gandhi et al. 2012; Meyers et al. 2002; Preechawat et al. 2008). Findings that warrant emergency treatment include uncontrollable open-angle glaucoma, subretinal effusion, and retinal detachment. Close interaction with the ophthalmologist is critical in patients with cavernous sinus DAVFs to decide when treatment is warranted.
Intracranial hemorrhage and nonhemorrhagic neurologic deficits are considered aggressive clinical features and are almost always seen in DAVFs with cortical venous drainage. Aggressive DAVFs include Borden types II/III and Cognard types IIb/IIIa + b/III/IV/V lesions. Hemorrhage, which results from the venous outflow, may be subdural, subarachnoid, or intraparenchymal as cortical veins traverse each of these different compartments (Kohama et al. 2010; Deshmukh et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2009). As previously stated, anterior cranial fossa and tentorial DAVFs are more prone to present with hemorrhage than DAVFs in other locations as the former are almost always drained by cortical veins. Nonhemorrhagic neurologic deficits come in two varieties, focal and non-focal. Non-focal signs and symptoms appear to be related to passive venous hypertension and/or venous congestion. Focal seizures, transient ischemic attacks, motor weakness, and brainstem and cerebellar symptoms are dependent on the territory of the draining vein or veins (Lasjaunias et al. 1986).
Intracranial DAVFs that drain into perimedullary veins of the spinal cord can cause myelopathy as a result of increased pressure within intramedullary veins leading to reduction in perfusion and microcirculation (Perkash et al. 2002; Kalamangalam et al. 2002; Wiesmann et al. 2000; Akkoc et al. 2006; Renner et al. 2006). Cerebral angiography should be considered in any patient presenting with myelopathy of unknown etiology (Figs. 7, 8). In pediatric patients with high-flow fistulas, cardiac failure and respiratory distress can be seen.
Treatment
The decision to treat a patient with a DAVF requires a multidisciplinary approach involving discussions among interventional neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, and neurologists and depends on the type of lesion, including location and angiographic risk strata, assessment of clinical presentation, and patient status (age, comorbidities). The risk of treatment should always be weighed against what is known about the natural history of a particular lesion. In general, low-grade fistulae, including Borden I and Cognard I and IIa DAVFs, can be treated conservatively. These benign lesions have an excellent natural history and can typically be followed with MR angiography (Luciani et al. 2001). However, any change in clinical signs or symptoms (even resolution) requires urgent repeat catheter angiography to rule out the development of cortical venous reflux. High-grade lesions, with cortical venous reflux or venous varices, require early treatment to avoid potentially devastating complications of hemorrhage and nonhemorrhagic neurologic deficits. Patients with decreasing visual acuity, visual loss, ophthalmoplegia, intracranial hemorrhage, or infarction require emergent treatment. Re-hemorrhage risks have been reported as high as 35 % within 2 weeks of initial hemorrhage (Duffau et al. 1999). Low-grade fistulae with debilitating symptoms such as intolerable tinnitus or severe orbital symptoms are candidates for early treatment.
When treatment of a DAVF is indicated, first-line management is endovascular embolization. Microsurgery may be used either in combination with endovascular techniques or when endovascular therapy fails. Although surgical resection or skeletonization of the involved segment of sinus is effective, bleeding complications are not uncommon given the highly vascular nature of DAVFs (Sundt and Piepgras 1983). Stereotactic radiosurgery has been used to treat patients with DAVFs with variable success (Hirai et al. 1998). Improved success rates for radiosurgery have been reported when used as an adjunct to transarterial embolization (TAE). The role of stereotactic radiosurgery remains controversial; whether it should be a first choice of treatment or only a last resort as an alternative to endovascular treatment or surgical resection remains unclear (Hanakita et al. 2012). Compression therapy has been used to treat DAVFs and may still be useful in select patients with low-risk fistulas.
Compression therapy has been used with variable success to treat cavernous sinus and transverse/sigmoid sinus DAVFs and may still be useful in select patients with low-risk lesions (Higashida et al. 1986; Halbach et al. 1987b). This technique requires a compliant, highly motivated patient free of cervical carotid atherosclerotic disease. For patients with cavernous DAVFs, compression of the ipsilateral carotid-jugular sheath is performed for a period of 10 s several times per hour. Compression must only be performed by the patient while seated or lying down using the contralateral hand. The compressing arm should be free to fall if hemispheric ischemia where to occur. If tolerated, the length of compression is gradually increased to 30 s periods several times per hour. With effective compression, there should be marked improvement or total resolution of the bruit. Using this technique Halbach et al. reported complete cure in seven of 23 patients (30 %). No complications occurred (Halbach et al. 1987b). In another series, Higashida et al. reported a cure rate of 30 % using the same technique. At 1-year follow-up no recurrence either clinically or at angiography was reported (Higashida et al. 1986). For transverse/sigmoid sinus fistulae, compression of the occipital artery over the mastoid bone may be effective. Occipital artery compression therapy resulted in a complete cure in two of nine patients (22 %) and improvement in three of nine (33 %) in one series (Halbach et al. 1987b).
Endovascular embolization can be performed via the transarterial route or transvenous route. Complex fistulas may require using a combination of transvenous and transarterial techniques to disconnect the cortical venous reflux and occlude the fistula. TAE involves superselective distal catheterization of dural branches supplying the DAVF with the microcatheter tip in a wedged position within the feeding artery. The goal is to embolize the origin of the draining vein; thus, the embolic agent must penetrate the fistulous connection and proximal aspect of the draining vein. An injection that is too proximal and does not occlude the vein can result in arterial recruitment and persistence of the fistula. An injection too distal may lead to migration within the draining vein(s) resulting in an increased risk of infarction or hemorrhage. Complete cures are sometimes difficult to achieve with TAE because of the existence of feeding arteries that cannot be catheterized and the recruitment of blood supply from collateral arteries. However, TAE may be the only viable option in certain circumstances where transvenous embolization (TVE) is not possible because of limited sinus venous access to the fistula site due to stenosis or thrombosis (Cognard et al. 2008).
Multiple embolic agents can be used to perform TAE including microcoils, polyvinyl alcohol particles, and liquid embolic agents, namely, n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and Onyx (eV3 Neurovascular Inc., Irvine, CA). Although particles can reduce shunt flow, they do not produce a durable cure and should not be used as stand-alone treatment. Particles can be used as a supplement to incompletely treated lesions following glue embolization to reduce the flow in collateral vessels and help to induce thrombosis, or in combination with surgery or radiosurgery (Cognard et al. 2008; Agid et al. 2009). Coils can be used as an adjunct to liquid embolic agents but similar to particles do not typically produce a durable cure when used alone.
The most commonly used embolic agents are the liquid embolics, NBCA and Onyx. NBCA has been extensively used with very good success over the last several decades (Kiyosue et al. 2004). Durable fistula obliteration can be achieved, particularly when the embolic material reaches the fistulous connection. The use of NBCA is predicated on its liquid character, which allows it to penetrate into the venous outflow tract where it ultimately polymerizes into an adhesive, solid material upon contact with blood inducing thrombosis and vessel occlusion. The major disadvantage of NBCA is the somewhat unpredictable nature of its polymerization, often leading to inadequate penetration into the fistula. Another potential disadvantage is the fact that NBCA is an adhesive agent and risks permanent retention of the microcatheter. Glue generally requires a highly experienced operator with the ability to determine the appropriate glue dilution.
Onyx is a relatively new (approved for treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations in 2005), nonadhesive liquid embolic agent that has gained popularity in the treatment of DAVFs. It consists of an ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer preparation dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Tantalum power is added for radiopaque visualization. Unlike NBCA which polymerizes almost immediately, Onyx has a very slow solidification rate which allows for prolonged, controlled injections. The main advantage of Onyx over NBCA is the ability to administer a large volume of embolic agent via a long-duration injection through 1 pedicle (Panagiotopoulos et al. 2009).
Recent preliminary reports show high curative rates associated with transarterial embolization with Onyx. Nogueira et al. treated 12 consecutive patients with intracranial DAVFs between March 2006 and February 2007 using Onyx. All procedures were performed via a transarterial approach. Complete angiographic cure was seen in 11 of the 12 patients (91.7 %). There was no significant morbidity or mortality, and no patient required follow-up surgery or radiosurgery (Nogueira et al. 2008). Cognard et al. reported on 30 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for DAVFs with cortical venous reflux. Onyx embolization, via a transarterial approach, resulted in complete angiographic cure in 24 cases (Cognard et al. 2008). A retrospective review of the Barrow Neurological Institute endovascular database highlighted 50 patients with 63 cranial DAVFs that were treated with transarterial Onyx embolization. When Onyx was used as the sole embolic agent, 32 of 37 DAVFs (87 %) achieved angiographic cure (Hu et al. 2011). Jiang et al. retrospectively studied five patients with transverse/sigmoid sinus DAVFs in whom transverse sinus packing was attempted with a transarterial approach using Onyx. Embolizations were all performed via the middle meningeal artery and angiographic cure was obtained in all five cases. No complications were seen (Jiang et al. 2011). Stiefel et al. reported a 72 % complete occlusion rate using Onyx, with four complications (Stiefel et al. 2009).
TVE pioneered by Mullan has been shown to have a high likelihood of cure and is often used to treat transverse/sigmoid sinus and cavernous sinus DAVFs (Stiefel et al. 2009; Roy and Raymond 1997). It is usually performed via the transfemoral approach, although jugular vein puncture, facial vein puncture, superior ophthalmic vein puncture, or even transcranial approaches may be necessary (Naito et al. 2002; Houdart et al. 2002; Jiang et al. 2013). On occasion, a multidisciplinary surgical and endovascular approach must be utilized to cure deep lesions with limited surgical or transvascular access (Zink et al. 2004; Kong et al. 2007). TVE is performed by retrograde catheterization of the involved dural sinus or cortical vein followed by deposition of coils and/or liquid embolic material adjacent to the arteriovenous shunt. The preferred technique at our institution is to initially deploy a detachable coil(s) to form a scaffolding or anchoring basket to prevent migration of subsequent coils. Detachable coils allow for excellent control of coil deposition such that a coil can be placed at the precise location within the sinus. Pushable fibered coils, which are more thrombogenic and much less expensive, are then added to achieve complete occlusion of the venous segment (Fig. 9).
The goal of treatment is occlusion of the fistula and/or disconnection of leptomeningeal or cortical reflux while preserving normal venous drainage. Careful examination of the venous drainage pattern before embolization is crucial to determine if the patient will tolerate sinus occlusion. TVE is safest when the diseased sinus segment has minimal contributions to normal venous outflow and can be completely occluded (Gandhi et al. 2012). The presence of a cortical vein that uses the involved sinus for drainage should suggest a high risk of venous infarction or worsening of neurological deficit if the sinus is occluded. In these circumstances precise identification of the fistula is essential to avoid potential complications (Davies et al. 1997; Gandhi et al. 2012). Additionally, occlusion of major cortical veins such as Labbe, Trolard, internal cerebral veins and the vein of Galen should also be avoided, unless it is clear that they do not serve to drain parenchymal blood. Partial dural sinus embolization should be avoided as shunt flow into the normal cerebral venous pathways can worsen cortical venous drainage (Davies et al. 1997). The ability to close a fistula in 1 session as well as the relative ease with which one can gain retrograde venous access makes TVE embolization very appealing. This technique is particularly useful for DAVFs with multiple arterial feeders that are either too small or too tortuous to treat with TAE. Risks of TVE include vessel perforation, cerebral infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and focal neurological deficits related to changes in the venous drainage pattern (Gandhi et al. 2012).
Conclusion
Intracranial DAVFs are rare pathologic lesions accounting for 10–15 % of intracranial arteriovenous shunts. Signs and symptoms are highly variable and depend upon several factors including fistula location, duration of disease, and most importantly venous drainage pattern. Symptoms range from pulse-synchronous tinnitus and exophthalmos to cranial nerve deficits, cognitive impairment, venous infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and even death. DAVFs are dynamic lesions that may either spontaneously regress or progress, and close clinical and radiologic monitoring is mandatory. Treatment should be pursued for all lesions with cortical venous drainage or intolerable symptoms. Management decisions require a multidisciplinary approach involving discussions among interventional neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, and neurologists.
Abbreviations
- Borden classification:
-
Classification system of dural arteriovenous fistulas where by these lesions are grouped into three types based upon the site of venous drainage and the presence or absence of cortical venous drainage.
- Cognard classification:
-
Classification system of dural arteriovenous fistulas that correlates venous drainage patterns with increasingly aggressive neurological clinical course.
- Compression therapy:
-
Non-invasive method to treat cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulae.
- Dural arteriovenous fistulas:
-
An abnormal direct connection between a meningeal artery and a meningeal vein or dural venous sinus.
- NBCA:
-
N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate is a liquid embolic used in the treatment of cerebral vascular malformations.
- Onyx:
-
Non-adhesive liquid embolic agent used for the pre-surgical embolization of cerebral vascular malformations.
References
Agid R, Terbrugge K, Rodesch G, Andersson T, Söderman M (2009) Management strategies for anterior cranial fossa (ethmoidal) dural arteriovenous fistulas with an emphasis on endovascular treatment. J Neurosurg 110(1):79–84. doi:10.3171/2008.6.17601
Akkoc Y, Atamaz F, Oran I, Durmaz B (2006) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula draining into spinal perimedullary veins: a rare cause of myelopathy. J Korean Med Sci 21(5):958–962
Al-Shahi R, Bhattacharya JJ, Currie DG, Papanastassiou V, Ritchie V, Roberts RC, Sellar RJ, Warlow CP, Scottish Intracranial Vascular Malformation Study Collaborators (2003) Prospective, population-based detection of intracranial vascular malformations in adults: the Scottish Intracranial Vascular Malformation Study (SIVMS). Stroke 34(5):1163–1169
Aminoff MJ (1973) Vascular anomalies in the intracranial dura mater. Brain 96(3):601–612
Awad IA, Little JR, Akarawi WP, Ahl J (1990) Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations: factors predisposing to an aggressive neurological course. J Neurosurg 72(6):839–850
Barrow DL, Spector RH, Braun IF, Landman JA, Tindall SC, Tindall GT (1985) Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. J Neurosurg 62(2):248–256
Bertalanffy A, Dietrich W, Kitz K, Bavinzski G (2001) Treatment of dural arteriovenous fistulae (dAVF’s) at the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) using embolisation combined with micro- or radiosurgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 44(4):205–210
Borden JA, Wu JK, Shucart WA (1995) A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 82(2):166–179
Brown RD Jr, Wiebers DO, Nichols DA (1994) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: angiographic predictors of intracranial hemorrhage and clinical outcome in nonsurgical patients. J Neurosurg 81(4):531–538
Byrne JV, Garcia M (2013) Tentorial dural fistulas: endovascular management and description of the medial dural-tentorial branch of the superior cerebellar artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34(9):1798–1804
Castaigne P, Bories J, Brunet P, Merland JJ, Meininger V (1976) Meningeal arterio-venous fistulas with cortical venous drainage. Rev Neurol (Paris) 132(3):169–181
Chaudhary MY, Sachdev VP, Cho SH, Weitzner I Jr, Puljic S, Huang YP (1982) Dural arteriovenous malformation of the major venous sinuses: an acquired lesion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 3(1):13–19
Chung SJ, Kim JS, Kim JC, Lee SK, Kwon SU, Lee MC, Suh DC (2002) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: analysis of 60 patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 13(2):79–88
Cognard C, Gobin YP, Pierot L, Bailly AL, Houdart E, Casasco A, Chiras J, Merland JJ (1995) Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology 194(3):671–680
Cognard C, Houdart E, Casasco A, Gabrillargues J, Chiras J, Merland JJ (1997) Long-term changes in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae leading to worsening in the type of venous drainage. Neuroradiology 39(1):59–66
Cognard C, Januel AC, Silva NA Jr, Tall P (2008) Endovascular treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with cortical venous drainage: new management using Onyx. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(2):235–241 (Epub 7 Nov 2007)
Cohen SD, Goins JL, Butler SG, Morris PP, Browne JD (2009) Dural arteriovenous fistula: diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Laryngoscope 119(2):293–297
Daniels DJ, Vellimana AK, Zipfel GJ, Lanzino G (2013) Intracranial hemorrhage from dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical features and outcome. Neurosurg Focus 34(5):E15. doi:10.3171/2013.4.FOCUS1335
Davies MA, TerBrugge K, Willinsky R, Coyne T, Saleh J, Wallace MC (1996) The validity of classification for the clinical presentation of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 85(5):830–837
Davies MA, Saleh J, Ter Brugge K, Willinsky R, Wallace MC (1997) The natural history and management of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae. Part 1: benign lesions. Interv Neuroradiol 3(4):295–302 (Epub 15 May 2001)
Deshmukh VR, Chang S, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, Spetzler RF (2005) Bilateral ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistulae: a previously unreported entity: case report. Neurosurgery 57(4):E809
Djindjian R, Merland JJ (1978) Superselective arteriography of the external carotid artery. Springer, New York
Duffau H, Lopes M, Janosevic V, Sichez JP, Faillot T, Capelle L, Ismaïl M, Bitar A, Arthuis F, Fohanno D (1999) Early rebleeding from intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: report of 20 cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 90(1):78–84
Fermand M, Reizine D, Melki JP, Riche MC, Merland JJ (1987) Long term follow-up of 43 pure dural arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) of the lateral sinus. Neuroradiology 29(4):348–353
Field M, Branstetter BF 4th, Levy E, Yonas H, Jungreis CA (2002) Dural arteriovenous fistula after ventriculostomy. Case illustration. J Neurosurg 97(1):227
Gandhi D, Chen J, Pearl M, Huang J, Gemmete JJ, Kathuria S (2012) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: classification, imaging findings, and treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(6):1007–1013. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2798 (Epub 12 Jan 2012)
Gliemroth J, Nowak G, Arnold H (1999) Dural arteriovenous malformation in the anterior cranial fossa. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 101(1):37–43
Grisoli F, Vincentelli F, Fuchs S, Baldini M, Raybaud C, Leclercq TA, Vigouroux RP (1984) Surgical treatment of tentorial arteriovenous malformations draining into the subarachnoid space. Report of four cases. J Neurosurg 60(5):1059–1066
Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Hieshima GB, Goto K, Norman D, Newton TH (1987a) Dural fistulas involving the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: results of treatment in 28 patients. Radiology 163(2):443–447
Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Hieshima GB, Reicher M, Norman D, Newton TH (1987b) Dural fistulas involving the cavernous sinus: results of treatment in 30 patients. Radiology 163(2):437–442
Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Hieshima GB, Rosenblum M, Cahan L (1988) Treatment of dural arteriovenous malformations involving the superior sagittal sinus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9(2):337–343
Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Hieshima GB, Wilson CB, Barnwell SL, Dowd CF (1990) Dural arteriovenous fistulas supplied by ethmoidal arteries. Neurosurgery 26(5):816–823
Hanakita S, Koga T, Shin M, Shojima M, Igaki H, Saito N (2012) Role of Gamma Knife surgery in the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 117(Suppl):158–163. doi:10.3171/2012.7.GKS12967
Hashimoto H, Iida J, Masui K, Nishi N, Yonezawa T, Sakaki T (1998) Dural arteriovenous malformation of the anterior cranial fossa occurring after bifrontal craniotomy. Surg Neurol 49(1):47–50
Herman JM, Spetzler RF, Bederson JB, Kurbat JM, Zabramski JM (1995) Genesis of a dural arteriovenous malformation in a rat model. J Neurosurg 83(3):539–545
Higashida RT, Hieshima GB, Halbach VV, Bentson JR, Goto K (1986) Closure of carotid cavernous sinus fistulae by external compression of the carotid artery and jugular vein. Acta Radiol 369(Suppl):580–583
Hirai T, Korogi Y, Baba Y, Nishimura R, Hamatake S, Kawanaka K, Bussaka H, Takahashi M (1998) Dural carotid cavernous fistulas: role of conventional radiation therapy–long-term results with irradiation, embolization, or both. Radiology 207(2):423–430
Houdart E, Saint-Maurice JP, Chapot R, Ditchfield A, Blanquet A, Lot G, Merland JJ (2002) Transcranial approach for venous embolization of dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 97(2):280–286
Houser OW, Baker HL Jr, Rhoton AL Jr, Okazaki H (1972) Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations. Radiology 105(1):55–64
Hu YC, Newman CB, Dashti SR, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG (2011) Cranial dural arteriovenous fistula: transarterial Onyx embolization experience and technical nuances. J Neurointerv Surg 3(1):5–13
Hurst RW, Bagley LJ, Galetta S, Glosser G, Lieberman AP, Trojanowski J, Sinson G, Stecker M, Zager E, Raps EC, Flamm ES (1998) Dementia resulting from dural arteriovenous fistulas: the pathologic findings of venous hypertensive encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19(7):1267–1273
Jiang C, Lv X, Li Y, Wu Z (2011) Transarterial Onyx packing of the transverse-sigmoid sinus for dural arteriovenous fistulas. Eur J Radiol 80(3):767–770
Jiang C, Lv X, Li Y, Wu Z, Shi J (2013) Surgical access on the superior ophthalmic vein to the cavernous sinus dural fistula for embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 5(3):e13. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010227 (Epub 2 Mar 2012)
Kalamangalam GP, Bhattacharya J, Teasdale E, Thomas M (2002) Myelopathy from intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72(6):816–818
Kawaguchi T, Kawano T, Kaneko Y, Ooasa T, Ooigawa H, Ogasawara S (2002) Traumatic lesions of the bilateral middle meningeal arteries–case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 42(5):221–223
Kerber CW, Newton TH (1973) The macro and microvasculature of the dura mater. Neuroradiology 6(4):175–179
Khan S, Polston DW, Shields RW Jr, Rasmussen P, Gupta R (2009) Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistula presenting with quadriparesis: case report and review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 18(6):428–434
Kirsch M, Liebig T, Kühne D, Henkes H (2009) Endovascular management of dural arteriovenous fistulas of the transverse and sigmoid sinus in 150 patients. Neuroradiology 51(7):477–483
Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Okahara M, Tanoue S, Sagara Y, Matsumoto S, Nagatomi H, Mori H (2004) Treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: current strategies based on location and hemodynamics, and alternative techniques of transcatheter embolization. Radiographics 24(6):1637–1653
Koc O, Genc E, Ozturk B, Genc BO, Keskin F, Ozbek O (2013) Dural carotico-cavernous fistula: pre and postembolization appearances of bone-subtracted CT angiography. Turk Neurosurg 23(2):249–251. doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.4301-11.1
Koenigsberg RA (1996) Spontaneous pulsatile tinnitus secondary to a dural malformation not visualized by magnetic resonance angiography. Clin Imaging 20(2):95–98
Kohama M, Nishimura S, Mino M, Hori E, Yonezawa S, Kaimori M, Nishijima M (2010) Anterior cranial fossa dural arteriovenous fistula with bilateral cortical drainers–case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 50(3):217–220
Kong DS, Kwon KH, Kim JS, Hong SC, Jeon P (2007) Combined surgical approach with intraoperative endovascular embolization for inaccessible dural arteriovenous fistulas. Surg Neurol 68(1):72–77 (discussion 78)
Kurl S, Saari T, Vanninen R, Hernesniemi J (1996) Dural arteriovenous fistulas of superior sagittal sinus: case report and review of literature. Surg Neurol 45(3):250–255
Lalwani AK, Dowd CF, Halbach VV (1993) Grading venous restrictive disease in patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas of the transverse/sigmoid sinus. J Neurosurg 79(1):11–15
Lasjaunias P, Chiu M, ter Brugge K, Tolia A, Hurth M, Bernstein M (1986) Neurological manifestations of intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 64(5):724–730
Lawton MT, Jacobowitz R, Spetzler RF (1997) Redefined role of angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 87(2):267–274
Lawton MT, Chun J, Wilson CB, Halbach VV (1999) Ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistulae: an assessment of surgical and endovascular management. Neurosurgery 45(4):805–810 (discussion 810–811)
Lee SK, Willinsky RA, Montanera W, terBrugge KG (2003) MR imaging of dural arteriovenous fistulas draining into cerebellar cortical veins. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24(8):1602–1606
Lee CW, Huang A, Wang YH, Yang CY, Chen YF, Liu HM (2010) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: diagnosis and evaluation with 64-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 256(1):219–228. doi:10.1148/radiol.10091835
Liu JK, Dogan A, Ellegala DB, Carlson J, Nesbit GM, Barnwell SL, Delashaw JB (2009) The role of surgery for high-grade intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: importance of obliteration of venous outflow. J Neurosurg 110(5):913–920
Lucas Cde P, Zabramski JM (2007) Dural arteriovenous fistula of the transverse-sigmoid sinus causing trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149(12):1249–1253
Luciani A, Houdart E, Mounayer C, Saint Maurice JP, Merland JJ (2001) Spontaneous closure of dural arteriovenous fistulas: report of three cases and review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22(5):992–996
Lv X, Li Y, Wu Z (2008) Endovascular treatment of anterior cranial fossa dural arteriovenous fistula. Neuroradiology 50(5):433–437
Malek AM, Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Phatouros CC, Meyers PM, Dowd CF (2000) Treatment of dural arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 11(1):147–166, ix
Martin NA, King WA, Wilson CB, Nutik S, Carter LP, Spetzler RF (1990) Management of dural arteriovenous malformations of the anterior cranial fossa. J Neurosurg 72(5):692–697
Meckel S, Maier M, Ruiz DS, Yilmaz H, Scheffler K, Radue EW, Wetzel SG (2007) MR angiography of dural arteriovenous fistulas: diagnosis and follow-up after treatment using a time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(5):877–884
Meyers PM, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Lempert TE, Malek AM, Phatouros CC, Lefler JE, Higashida RT (2002) Dural carotid cavernous fistula: definitive endovascular management and long-term follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 134(1):85–92
Nabors MW, Azzam CJ, Albanna FJ, Gulya AJ, Davis DO, Kobrine AI (1987) Delayed postoperative dural arteriovenous malformations. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 66(5):768–772
Naito I, Magarisawa S, Wada H (2002) Facial vein approach by direct puncture at the base of the mandible for dural carotid-cavernous fistula. An alternative to the superior ophthalmic vein approach. A case report. Interv Neuroradiol 8(1):67–70 (Epub 20 Oct 2004)
Natarajan SK, Ghodke B, Kim LJ, Hallam DK, Britz GW, Sekhar LN (2010) Multimodality treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas in the Onyx era: a single center experience. World Neurosurg 73(4):365–379
Newton TH, Cronqvist S (1969) Involvement of dural arteries in intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Radiology 93(5):1071–1078
Nishio A, Ohata K, Tsuchida K, Tsuyuguchi N, Hara M, Komiyama M, Tsuruno T, Murata T (2002) Dural arteriovenous fistula involving the superior sagittal sinus following sinus thrombosis–case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 42(5):217–220
Nogueira RG, Dabus G, Rabinov JD, Eskey CJ, Ogilvy CS, Hirsch JA, Pryor JC (2008) Preliminary experience with onyx embolization for the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(1):91–97 (Epub 1 Nov 2007)
Panagiotopoulos V, Gizewski E, Asgari S, Regel J, Forsting M, Wanke I (2009) Embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(1):99–106. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1314 (Epub 8 Oct 2008)
Perkash I, Punj V, Ota DT, Lane B, Skirboll S (2002) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula causing a myelopathy. Spinal Cord 40(9):438–442
Preechawat P, Narmkerd P, Jiarakongmun P, Poonyathalang A, Pongpech SM (2008) Dural carotid cavernous sinus fistula: ocular characteristics, endovascular management and clinical outcome. J Med Assoc Thai 91(6):852–858
Renner C, Helm J, Roth H, Meixensberger J (2006) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula associated with progressive cervical myelopathy and normal venous drainage of the thoracolumbar cord: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 65(5):506–510
Reul J, Thron A, Laborde G, Brückmann H (1993) Dural arteriovenous malformations at the base of the anterior cranial fossa: report of nine cases. Neuroradiology 35(5):388–393
Roy D, Raymond J (1997) The role of transvenous embolization in the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgery 40(6):1133–1141 (discussion 1141–1144)
Santillan A, Nanaszko M, Burkhardt JK, Patsalides A, Gobin YP, Riina HA (2013) Endovascular management of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115(3):241–251
Satomi J, van Dijk JM, Terbrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC (2002) Benign cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: outcome of conservative management based on the natural history of the lesion. J Neurosurg 97(4):767–770
Shah MN, Botros JA, Pilgram TK, Moran CJ, Cross DT 3rd, Chicoine MR, Rich KM, Dacey RG Jr, Derdeyn CP, Zipfel GJ (2012) Borden-Shucart Type I dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical course including risk of conversion to higher-grade fistulas. J Neurosurg 117(3):539–545. doi:10.3171/2012.5.JNS111257 (Epub 22 Jun 2012)
Singh V, Meyers PM, Halbach VH, Gress DR, Higashida RT, Dowd CF, Smith WS (2001) Dural arteriovenous fistula associated with prothrombin gene mutation. J Neuroimaging 11(3):319–321
Stiebel-Kalish H, Setton A, Nimii Y, Kalish Y, Hartman J, Huna Bar-On R, Berenstein A, Kupersmith MJ (2002) Cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous malformations: patterns of venous drainage are related to clinical signs and symptoms. Ophthalmology 109(9):1685–1691
Stiefel MF, Albuquerque FC, Park MS, Dashti SR, McDougall CG (2009) Endovascular treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae using Onyx: a case series. Neurosurgery 65(6 Suppl):132–139. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000345949.41138.01 (discussion 139–140)
Suh DC, Lee JH, Kim SJ, Chung SJ, Choi CG, Kim HJ, Kim CJ, Kook M, Ahn HS, Kwon SU, Kim JS (2005) New concept in cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula: correlation with presenting symptom and venous drainage patterns. Stroke 36(6):1134–1139
Sundt TM Jr, Piepgras DG (1983) The surgical approach to arteriovenous malformations of the lateral and sigmoid dural sinuses. J Neurosurg 59(1):32–39
Terada T, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Tsuura M, Komai N, Wilson CB, Hieshima GB (1994) Development of acquired arteriovenous fistulas in rats due to venous hypertension. J Neurosurg 80(5):884–889
Terada T, Tsuura M, Komai N, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Wilson CB, Hieshima GB (1996) The role of angiogenic factor bFGF in the development of dural AVFs. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138(7):877–883
Terada T, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Hieshima GB (1998) The effect of oestrogen on the development of arteriovenous fistulae induced by venous hypertension in rats. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140(1):82–86
Tirakotai W, Bertalanffy H, Liu-Guan B, Farhoud A, Sure U (2005) Immunohistochemical study in dural arteriovenous fistulas and possible role of local hypoxia for the de novo formation of dural arteriovenous fistulas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107(6):455–460
Tomak PR, Cloft HJ, Kaga A, Cawley CM, Dion J, Barrow DL (2003) Evolution of the management of tentorial dural arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 52(4):750–760
Uranishi R, Nakase H, Sakaki T (1999) Expression of angiogenic growth factors in dural arteriovenous fistula. J Neurosurg 91(5):781–786
van Dijk JM, terBrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC (2002) Clinical course of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with long-term persistent cortical venous reflux. Stroke 33(5):1233–1236
Wiesmann M, Padovan CS, Pfister HW, Yousry TA (2000) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula with spinal medullary venous drainage. Eur Radiol 10(10):1606–1609
Willinsky R, Terbrugge K, Montanera W, Mikulis D, Wallace MC (1994) Venous congestion: an MR finding in dural arteriovenous malformations with cortical venous drainage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15(8):1501–1507
Willinsky R, Goyal M, terBrugge K, Montanera W (1999) Tortuous, engorged pial veins in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: correlations with presentation, location, and MR findings in 122 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20(6):1031–1036
Witt O, Pereira PL, Tillmann W (1999) Severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and dural arteriovenous fistula in an infant with protein S deficiency. Childs Nerv Syst 15(2–3):128–130
Wrobel CJ, Oldfield EH, Di Chiro G, Tarlov EC, Baker RA, Doppman JL (1988) Myelopathy due to intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas draining intrathecally into spinal medullary veins. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 69(6):934–939
Yassari R, Jahromi B, Macdonald R (2002) Dural arteriovenous fistula after craniotomy for pilocytic astrocytoma in a patient with protein S deficiency. Surg Neurol 58(1):59–64
Yoshimura S, Hashimoto N, Kazekawa K, Obata A, Yutani C, Ogata J (1995) Arteriovenous fistula around the ventriculoperitoneal shunt system in a patient with a dural arteriovenous malformation of the posterior fossa. Case report. J Neurosurg 82(2):288–290
Zhou LF, Chen L, Song DL, Gu YX, Leng B (2007) Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas. Surg Neurol 67(5):472–481
Zink WE, Meyers PM, Connolly ES, Lavine SD (2004) Combined surgical and endovascular management of a complex posttraumatic dural arteriovenous fistula of the tentorium and straight sinus. J Neuroimaging 14(3):273–276
Zipfel GJ, Shah MN, Refai D, Dacey RG Jr, Derdeyn CP (2009) Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: modification of angiographic classification scales based on new natural history data. Neurosurg Focus 26(5):E14. doi:10.3171/2009.2.FOCUS0928
Further Reading
Guedin P, Gaillard S, Boulin A, Condette-Auliac S, Bourdain F, Guieu S, Dupuy M, Rodesch G (2010) Therapeutic management of intracranial dural arteriovenous shunts with leptomeningeal venous drainage: report of 53 consecutive patients with emphasis on transarterial embolization with acrylic glue. J Neurosurg 112(3):603–610. doi:10.3171/2009.7.JNS08490
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bruno, C.A., Sahlein, D.H., Meyers, P.M. (2015). Endovascular Treatment of Cranial Dural Arterio-Venous Fistulas. In: Lanzer, P. (eds) PanVascular Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37078-6_97
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37078-6_97
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37077-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37078-6
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine