Abstract
Manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) with unique physical and chemical properties have attracted a great deal of attention as key materials to underpin future scientific and technological advancements. Applications of MNMs can also provide breakthroughs in the construction industry by reinforcing mechanical properties, decreasing vulnerability to chemical corrosion and accidental damage, and providing supplementary functions such as anti-biofouling and hydrophilicity. With the enhancement of material performance and functionality, use of MNMs enables (partial) nonutility generation, low carbon emission, and self-assessment of structural health to increase the sustainability of buildings and infrastructures. On the other hand, recent research into the safety of MNMs has raised concerns about their adverse biological and environmental effects. There is a high probability that MNMs used in construction will have hazardous effects on human and ecological receptors, considering that MNMs incorporated into construction materials would be released via multiple exposure routes during their entire lifecycle (manufacturing, construction, demolition, and recycling/disposal). Consequently, to responsibly utilize the potential benefits of nanotechnology in construction, multidisciplinary efforts are required to develop proactive strategies to mitigate the environmental release of MNMs and guidelines to manage their environmental risks throughout construction-related activities.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Extracellular Polymeric Substance
- Construction Material
- Construction Product
- Construction Waste
- Cement Hydration Process
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Nanotechnology, as a new industrial revolution, has brought myriad opportunities to a variety of scientific, engineering, and technology sectors. The bottom-up synthetic strategy in the transitional zone between atom and molecule creates nanodimensional materials with novel physical and chemical properties, offering great potential for diverse applications including (photo)catalysts, electronic and electrochemical materials, energy conversion and storage devices, mechanical composites, and optical instruments [29.1,2,3,4,5].
The incorporation of various manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) into the matrices of conventional construction materials leads to drastic advancement in vital characteristics including mechanical strength, fatigue and damage resistance, durability, and lightness [29.6,7,8,9]. MNMs as additives improve cohesive and tensile strength, flexibility, forgability, and weldability to enable facile construction and processing operations [29.8,10]. MNMs incorporated into construction materials add new auxiliary functions such as photo-induced pollution control, antimicrobial activity, and heat- and sound-absorbing capacity [29.11,12,13]. Use of MNMs contributes to increased energy efficiency in commercial and residential buildings (e.g., highly insulating materials and energy-generating coatings) [29.14,15]. Coatings of MNMs provide corrosion resistance, fire retardation, and water repulsion to protect construction materials from weathering, aging, and contamination, eventually promoting their long-term serviceability [29.8,16,17]. MNMs embedded in construction materials are also applied in sensing and monitoring functions to assess construction safety and structural health [29.18,19].
Contrary to the general perspective on the promising applications of nanotechnology, technical viability has been relatively less explored in the construction industry, which is attributed to:
-
1.
Lack of informative research to ensure the potential benefits and identify the functionalities,
-
2.
Uncertainties associated with nanoscale materialsʼ longevity and environmental health and safety,
-
3.
Conservative nature of construction industry, leading to limited adoption of new technology, and
-
4.
Economical feasibility.
Nevertheless, use of MNMs in the construction industry is expected to increase rapidly, as shown by the increasing number of research articles published on the subject of nanoconstruction in Fig. 29.1 because of:
-
1.
Recent advancement in harnessing unique nanoscale properties,
-
2.
Rapid expansion of commercial interest in nanoenabled products,
-
3.
Several research projects underway to assess and control potential hazards associated with engineered nanomaterials (NMs),
-
4.
High performance and versatility of MNMs imparted at low additive ratios, and
-
5.
Decreasing cost of base NMs due to their mass production.
In particular, despite the benefits of incorporating MNMs into construction materials, it is highly probable that concerns about their potential to become harmful environmental contaminants after their unwanted discharge limit their utility [29.20,21,22]. This underscores the need for assessment, standard protocols, and regulatory guidelines to address the environmental health and safety issues associated with manufacturing, transportation, use, and disposal of construction materials and products containing MNMs.
Applications of MNMs in Construction
The unique properties of MNMs can be exploited in construction for a variety of applications that encompass reinforced structural materials, low-maintenance and ecofriendly materials, multifunctional paints and coatings, renewable energy generation systems, and intelligent sensor/actuator devices (Table 29.1). The current and potential applications of MNMs in construction are described below, and some selected examples for MNMs used in construction and related MNM-containing products are illustrated in Figs. 29.2 and 29.3.
Concrete and Cement
Concrete is one of the most common manmade materials in the world. Conventional concrete is relatively strong in compression because fine and coarse aggregates such as sand and natural gravel in concrete efficiently carry the compressive load. However, traditional concrete has heterogeneous micro- and mesoporous structures through the random packing of concrete mixture of aggregates, cement, and water. Thus, it is weak in tension and flexure due to the complex internal pore structure of the concrete. There are several possible explanations for the improvement of mechanical properties by MNMs [29.7]. Firstly, nanosized materials fill the cement pores and serve as packing materials in concrete. Secondly, nanoparticles (NPs) promote cement hydration through tight binding with the cement hydrate. Finally, NMs efficiently inhibit the growth of large crystals (e.g., Ca(OH)2).
NPs have been applied to improve compressive strength during the past decade. Research into SiO2, TiO2 or Fe2O3 NPs used as a concrete additive material has shown that these nanosized particles serve as a filling agent to increase the strength of the concrete and improve its abrasion resistance [29.23,24,25]. Addition of silica NPs as a part of the mixture also enhances the durability of the concrete by blocking water penetration. SiO2 NPs can control the degradation of (CaO) ⋅ (SiO2) ⋅ (H2O), which is the product of the cement hydration process, by blocking water entry into the pores [29.8]. In addition, the weight of concrete would be reduced by using silica fume. Hematite (Fe2O3) NPs can be used as a monitoring material to quantify the stress levels by measuring section electrical resistance as well as a packing material [29.8]. Research into carbon-encapsulated nickel NPs incorporated into concrete also demonstrated an increase in the compressive strength of the cement due to the intense antiparallel ordering caused by a magnetic dipole interaction [29.7].
TiO2 NPs have other supplementary functions when applied to cement/concrete, such as sterilizing and self-cleaning, as well as filling the pores [29.26]. TiO2 as an ultraviolet (UV)-responsive photocatalyst yields reactive oxygen species (ROS) under light irradiation, resulting in destruction of volatile organic compounds, NO x , and bacterial membranes. Due to the UV-activated hydrophilic conversion, rain droplets attracted to an outdoor surface containing nano-TiO2 particles form a water layer which can wash away airborne pollutants, as airborne pollutants trapped in a TiO2 particle matrix undergo further oxidative degradation under sunlight illumination. Since TiO2 particles form a white pigment, nano-TiO2-added concrete has the additional advantage that it can retain whiteness during the lifetime of the concrete. Incorporation of nano-TiO2 into concrete has already been commercialized in the construction industry. The Jubilee Church in Rome was constructed from precast nano-TiO2-integrated concrete panels, which is sometimes called white concrete [29.8]. Prior to the Jubilee Church, nano-TiO2 was incorporated into road surfaces, and it was found that the NO x concentration was significantly decreased near the constructed road [29.8].
CaCO3 NPs have also been suggested as supplementary materials for addition to cement. Strength development during the initial period of cement hydration is significantly improved when nano-CaCO3 is added [29.9]. The mechanism behind the improved cement hydration rate by nano-CaCO3 needs to be further investigated, but the difference in the impact on hydration between micro-CaCO3 and nano-CaCO3 provides evidence that the size of the calcium carbonate particles plays a significant role in the hydration process. Another possible use of calcium carbonate as a biosealant in concrete is being studied [29.8]. Anaerobic microorganisms are incorporated into concrete mixing water, and subsequently excrete calcium carbonate, which fills the cement pores and results in improved compressive strength. Similarly, self-healing concrete in which microcapsules containing healing agents and catalysts are embedded is being investigated to solve crack problems of concrete [29.51]. When cracks form in the concrete, the capsules would be ruptured. The released healing agent then contacts the catalyst, and the crack will be filled through polymerization.
Traditionally, steel has been incorporated in conventional concrete as a reinforcement bar (rebar) in order to strengthen the concrete in tension and flexure, but the process of placing steel bars and introducing wet concrete is time consuming and expensive. Cracking due to rebar corrosion or freeze–thaw cycles is also an issue for steel-reinforced concrete. Glass, plastic, or steel fibers have sometimes been added to produce reinforced concrete. These materials can either replace the steel rebars entirely or be added to concrete already reinforced by steel bars. Concrete reinforced with fibers, for example, carbon graphite fiber, which is a corrosion-proof and very high strength-to-weight material, is less expensive and has still higher tensile strength. Nanosized fibers were recently studied as an alternative reinforcing material for concrete. Reinforced concrete was produced by introducing nano- and microsized carbon fibers [carbon nanotubes (CNTs)] and centimeter-sized carbon graphite fibers, exhibiting improved mechanical properties [29.6,52]. Incorporation of CNTs is expected to show advantages over traditional fibers in reinforced concrete due to their distinct structural properties. CNTs are known as the strongest and stiffest materials in terms of tensile strength and elastic modulus, respectively. Therefore, they would improve the mechanical properties of the concrete. Also, the small size of CNTs should make them fill the cement pores and interrupt crack formation and growth at very early stages. On the other hand, the high aspect ratio of CNTs would play a role in preventing crack propagation, because higher energy would be required to propagate the crack around the nanotubes. In addition, CNTs can be chemically functionalized to interact with adjacent cement component. A recent study demonstrated that CNTs in concrete act as a nucleus to bind tightly with cement hydrate (C-S-H) around functionalized nanotubes [29.53].
In spite of their many advantages, there are economic and technical limitations to the use of CNTs in reinforced concrete. The cost of CNTs is still high and not competitive with other fiber materials. Furthermore, CNTs tend to form aggregates due to van der Waals forces, thus additional processes are required to achieve uniform distribution of individual tubes. Another issue with CNTs is weak bonding between the nanotubes and the cement matrix. Several research studies have been conducted to tackle these problems by functionalizing the nanotubes or through the use of surfactants and sonication to achieve uniform dispersion [29.27].
Steel
Steel has served as a reinforcement material in concrete or as a structural component in bridges, highways, or buildings by itself. In addition to its corrosion resistance, steel is also selected based on properties such as strength or weldability. Welding is one of the steel fabrication processes and creates a sector called the heat-affected zone (HAZ) adjacent to welds. The material properties of the HAZ are altered by heat-intensive cutting or welding processes, thus the HAZ and welds are brittle and can fail easily when a sudden dynamic load (e.g., seismic load) is applied. Addition of nanosized particles such as magnesium and calcium improves the weld toughness of steel as well as decreasing the size of the HAZ to 1/5 of that of conventional welded steel [29.8]. Not only improvement of toughness at welded joints, but also cost-saving due to the decreased material requirement to meet allowable limits is also expected when research currently underway is completed.
High-strength steel experiences delayed fracture problems, in which the steel material becomes brittle and fractures following exposure to hydrogen when strong tension is applied. Vanadium and molybdenum NPs have been incorporated to reduce the effects of hydrogen embrittlement and, therefore, to improve the delayed fracture problem of high-strength steel materials, especially high-strength bolts [29.8].
Many efforts have been made to improve the corrosion resistance of steel using nanotechnology, but very few products are available in the construction market. One of them is MMFX2 steel, which has a distinct nanostructure. A laminated lath structure resembling plywood in MMFX2 makes the steel corrosion resistant by hindering microgalvanic cell formation. In addition, according to the manufacturer, the unique features of the product provide improved strength, ductility, and toughness compared with conventional steel products. MMFX2 steel is currently used in many construction sites including bridges, parking structures, buildings, and highways. The Federal Highway Administration, the US Navy, and the American Iron and Steel Institute developed high-performance steel for bridges in 1990s. This new steel has higher fracture toughness, improved weldability, and better corrosion resistance than conventional steel by incorporating copper NPs, which are known to reduce the surface roughness of steel [29.10]. Another steel product available in the commercial market, but not for construction applications, is Sandvik Nanoflex. Although the manufacturer does not provide detailed information about the product, it is reported that very hard NPs are incorporated in the Sandvik Nanoflex steel matrix. Therefore, Sandvik Nanoflex has good corrosion and wear resistance and high modulus of elasticity.
Several ongoing research efforts focus on production of nanoscale fabricated metals, which are stronger than conventional steel or titanium. Such metals would be fabricated by weaving the material to produce ultrafine lattice structures or refining the cementite phase of steel to nanosize to produce cables [29.8]. The expected properties of such products are improved strength and reduced weight, and one of their applications could be as a structural component of suspension bridges.
Plastic
Multi-walled CNTs as a proxy for carbon black show improved performance as a filler material, drastically increasing the mechanical strength and electric and thermal conductivity of plastic composites [29.27,28]. CNTs incorporated into plastics also function as a flame retardant to enable rapid heat dissipation, preventing the possible release of hazardous gasses under fire [29.29]. Addition of nanoscale ceramic materials (e.g., nanoclays) to the polymer matrices creates lightweight nanocomposite plastics with high compressive strength [29.30]. Wood–plastic composites produced by manipulating fiber-to-fiber bonding at the nanoscale, which require much less maintenance and have a long service life because of their high rot resistance, gain improved mechanical properties through modifications using carbon nanofibers and nanoclays [29.31].
Window Glass
Incorporation of MNMs into glass matrices allows the production of windows to control the passage of light and heat through the walls of buildings. Such applications can increase energy efficiency by reducing heat loss to conserve building heating energy (e.g., low-emissivity glass) and by blocking solar heat to curtail energy consumption for air-conditioning and ventilation (e.g., heat absorbing and solar control glass). Due to its strong visible and infrared absorption, nanosized tungsten oxide (WO3) improves the heat reflectivity of a window to simultaneously reflect in-room heat back inside and mitigate solar heat gain through the window, and further enables variable light transmission [29.32]. Window glass containing lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6) NPs that selectively capture the heating wavelengths from 750 to 1300 nm secures sufficient natural daylight while maintaining uniform room temperature in hot weather seasons by transmitting visible light and blocking unwanted infrared light from the solar spectrum [29.11]. Nanostructured indium tin oxide (ITO) (or indium antimony oxide) film also creates highly transparent infrared-absorbing coatings on window glass, being commercialized under the product name AdNano ITO [29.11,54]. Ultrafine TiO2, ZnO, and TiO2/CeO2 uniformly cast on glass surfaces produce UV-reflecting windows by filtering out the UV fraction of sunlight without significantly decreasing visible light transmittance [29.8,14,33,34]. In this case, rutile TiO2 NPs with low photoactivity are in common use to avoid unwanted photocatalyzed destruction of surrounding matrices, as ZnO NPs are surface-modified with silica to facilitate homogeneous dispersion on the surface [29.14].
Light transmittance through the window can be controlled by photochromic coatings or layers that reversibly change their inherent color in response to incident light [29.55]. Photochromic films formed of MNMs including metal NPs, hybrid metal/metal oxide NPs, and quantum dots (QDs) can produce smart windows that react to light conditions, controlling the intensity of incident light, being translucent in the visible region to brighten interior spaces, or being reflective in the infrared region to retard thermal transfer [29.35,36,56,57,58]. Photochromic films containing platinum, palladium, or gold NPs exhibit coloration/color fading characteristics under light irradiation [29.57]. Dark-blue color rapidly develops on TiO2 films in combination with phosphotungstic acid (H3PW12O40) under UV irradiation and disappears in the presence of oxygen as an electron acceptor in the dark condition, as MoO3 or WO3 films coated with gold or platinum also undergo reversible UV-induced coloration on the window [29.35,36]. In particular, TiO2 film loaded with silver NPs on the window enables repeatable multicolor photochromism in which the initial brownish-grey color rapidly changes to the color of the excitation wavelength under irradiation by monochromatic visible light [29.58]. In addition to the photosensitive smart window, thermochromic glass that includes polymeric layers doped with various transition metals (e.g., Fe, Co) or metal/metal oxide nanocomposites (e.g., Au/VO2) also modifies the transmission and reflection properties, adapting to the surrounding temperature to create a nonelectrically activated window to regulate daylight depending on the background thermal conditions [29.59,60].
Antireflective coating of silica NPs causes micro- and nanoroughness on the glass surface, reducing the magnitude of visible light reflected and offering a clear view from inside to outside [29.14]. Vertically oriented pure rutile TiO2 nanorods on glass substrate also form an antireflective coating [29.61]. Note that 20% of the incident light is reflected at the TiO2–air interface, while the reflection at the uncoated glass–air interface is as low as 4%. Alternating layers of SiO2 and TiO2 NPs that exhibit a large refractive index contrast significantly improve light transmission through the window [29.14,62].
Deposition of nano-TiO2 on window glass offers a self-cleaning function under irradiation by sunlight or indoor light, because TiO2 can photosensitize production of ROS such as OH radicals, valence-band holes, and relevant efficient oxidation of organic substrates [29.2,63]. The photocatalyzed reactions initiating on nanosized TiO2-coated glass lead to photooxidation of hydrocarbons and photokilling of pathogenic microorganisms attached to the window and from the surrounding atmosphere [29.37,64]. In particular, metal or nonmetal doping allows TiO2 NPs to utilize visible light for photocatalytic ROS generation. Photoinduced hydrophilic conversion occurring on a TiO2 surface, which makes water spread out over the surface rather than remain as droplets, mitigates accumulation of hydrophobic dirt, as the increased density of surface hydroxyl groups under exposure to UV light enables antifogging and stain-proofing actions of the TiO2-modified window [29.65,66]. Such a photo-driven process for surface hydrophilization can be kinetically accelerated on TiO2-based composite layers (e.g., TiO2/WO3 or TiO2/SiO2) [29.67,68].
Inclusion of metal-oxide NPs can improve the mechanical strength, thermal stability, and chemical durability of window glass. Incorporation of aluminum nanopowders enhances the mechanical strength, microhardness, and chemical resistance of glass without significantly changing its optical properties [29.38], as silica NPs make windows highly scratch and wear resistant [29.14]. Nanoscale silica layers sandwiched between two glass panels form fire-protective window glass in which silica NPs swell, converting to mechanically reinforced and opaque forms in the event of a fire [29.8].
Coatings
Coatings utilizing MNMs are expected to impart diverse supplementary functionalities to construction-related surfaces and produce the desired protective and resistant surfaces on existing construction materials. Use of MNMs for thermal insulation leads to energy conservation and carbon emission reduction through efficient heat management. Due to the large surface-to-volume ratio and high porosity, nanoporous silica as an insulator enables significant air entrapment within a layer of minimal thickness, thereby effectively hindering heat transfer across the layer [29.14,20]. Aerogels or nanofoams of metal oxides (e.g., silica and alumina) that contain nanoscale pores primarily filled with air (>90%) can be employed for ultrathin and lightweight insulating coatings (relative to conventional insulating layers of polystyrene or cellulose) [29.14,20]. Three-dimensional and highly branched networks of SiO2, TiO2, or carbon NPs show exceptional insulative performance because nanosized cells, pores, and particles within the unique nanostructures produce substantially limited pathways for thermal conduction (through the interconnected NPs) and thermal energy transport (through the enclosed air molecules) [29.8,14,20].
Metallic NPs (e.g., silver and gold) produce antimicrobial coatings on diverse construction materials including cement/concrete, steel, plastic, and glass [29.14,39,40,41]. The antimicrobial activity of silver NPs embedded in paint leads to efficient inactivation and sterilization of pathogenic microbes on the substrate surface [29.12]. Silver or gold NPs dispersed in polymer matrices form antibacterial metal/polymer nanocomposite coatings, hindering microbial adhesion on the substrate material [29.40,41]. Thin films of metal-oxide-based semiconductor NPs (e.g., TiO2 and ZnO) on pavements, walls, and roofs function as antifouling and self-cleaning coatings under solar irradiation to depollute airborne contaminants, protect construction products from stains and dirt, and inhibit growth of bacteria and mold on the surface [29.42,69]. Micro- and nanopatterning reduce the surface energy and associated adhesion [29.70], offering water-repellant surfaces for construction products and making them less susceptible to dirt accumulation.
Thin films of ceramic NPs (e.g., SiO2), which are highly resistant to oxidation, can function as physical barrier layers to protect metallic construction materials against corrosion [29.16]. TiO2 NPs surface-modified with fluoroalkylsilane form hydrophobic coatings on the surface of stainless steel to prevent moisture-induced corrosion [29.17], as photogenerated conduction-band electrons are transferred from TiO2 coatings to the corroding metals, providing corrosion resistance properties under solar irradiation [29.71]. Ultrafine metal-oxide particles (e.g., SiO2, ZnO, and Al2O3 NPs) can serve as nanofillers for polymer-based coatings, thereby preventing infiltration of oxygen, water, and corrosive chemicals through the voids and cracks present in the polymer matrices [29.43]. Polymer encapsulation of nanosized Zn or Fe2O3 as anodic-type corrosion inhibitors leads to prolonged anticorrosion performance on the coated steel [29.43]. In particular, composite materials having metal-oxide core (e.g., CeO2, SiO2, TiO2, and ZrO2 NPs) with polymer shell responsive to an electric or mechanical trigger can produce smart corrosion-proof coatings by acting as nanoreservoirs to store organic corrosion inhibitors and release the entrapped reagents when external signals are applied [29.16]. In addition to corrosion resistance, nanosized SiO2, TiO2, and Sb2O3 as nonflammable fillers or additives reduce the thermal transfer rate, and improve the existing fire-resistant properties of polymer coatings or decorative paints [29.44,45].
Flexible solar panels that utilize silicon-based photovoltaic or dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells are being integrated into roofing membranes and mounted on windows, converting solar energy to generate electric power available for homes and buildings. The solar energy coating as a partial nonutility power producer achieves improved efficiency of renewable energy generation through the incorporation of semiconductor QDs (e.g., CdSe and InAs) [29.15] and carbon-based NMs (e.g., C60 and CNTs) [29.46].
Lighting
A light-emitting diode (LED) employs inorganic semiconductor NPs (e.g., GaN, ZeSe, and GaAsP) with different band-gaps and produces various colors of light as a result of electroluminescence [29.48,49]. LED devices are rapidly replacing conventional fluorescent and incandescent light bulbs because LEDs require low electric energy for lighting, provide long service life, and guarantee safe end-of-life management (i.e., no release of toxic metals).
Sensors
Nano- and microelectromechanical systems (NEMS and MEMS) can be applied as miniaturized implantable devices to allow real-time in situ monitoring and accurate assessment of the health status of construction materials/structures (e.g., cracking and stress) and environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, and pressure) [29.72]. In addition to nondestructive evaluation, NEMS and MEMS can also enable an effective strategy for quality management in cement/concrete construction by in situ observation of the cement hydration process, cement/concrete hardening, and strength development [29.73]. Piezoelectric materials such as BaTiO3 and PbTiO3 that can convert mechanical force and stress to an electric charge create intelligent aggregates or smart aggregates that can be embedded into concrete blocks to monitor initial concrete strength and structural health [29.18]. Uniform dispersion of piezoelectric ceramic NPs into the polymer matrices forms sensor coatings to detect crack initiation and development and track the structural response to impact damage [29.74]. CNT/polyelectrolyte thin films fabricated by the layer-by-layer (LBL) method cause a change in electrical resistance in response to mechanical stress (i.e., piezoresistive characteristics), suggesting potential application as a high-resolution strain-sensing system in concrete structures [29.50].
Environmental Release of MNMs Used in Construction
With the projected rapid increase in MNM use for construction materials, the possible release into the environment and associated human exposure have become areas of growing concern [29.75,76,77,78,79,80] (Fig. 29.4). Although numerous studies have reported toxicological impacts of NMs, a knowledge gap still remains with respect to the environmental risk of NMs associated with their exposure pathways for the potential receptors (ecosystems and human beings). In particular, while a limited body of literature has focused on the environmental fate, behavior, exposure, and toxic effects of MNMs as raw materials prior to further processes toward an end-product [29.76,77,80,81,82], there are few safety and health considerations and lifecycle studies regarding MNMs incorporated into construction products and the resultant MNM wastes generated during construction activities. The identification of possible sources, environmental release scenarios, and exposure routes of MNMs used in construction is critical in assessment of their overall environmental hazard and risk, and development of countermeasures. Therefore, the possible exposure scenarios via multiple routes for environmental discharge of MNMs used in construction are considered herein based on previous published studies and typical construction practices.
Construction Material Manufacturing
It is highly probable that the manufacturing stage will be the major source for environmental release of MNMs during the whole lifecycle of NM-containing construction products. MNMs that are not properly bound or incorporated into the basic materials such as concrete, steel, glass, etc. can directly disperse into the surrounding environment. During specific manufacturing processes including coating, molding, compounding, and incorporation, unintentional emission of MNMs into the atmosphere can occur as the primary pathway for environmental discharge, resulting in possible exposure of manufacturing workers via inhalation; For example, airborne NPs could be blown away during weighing of raw materials, and the aerosol type of fullerenes and CNTs could be emitted while treating carbon NMs in a sonicator for better dispersion in liquid media [29.83]. The risk assessment worksheet on the DuPont Light Stabilizer reported that nano-TiO2 particles could be released during the packaging process over the acceptable level [29.84]. Sepiolite nanoclay used as a filler material in construction nanocomposites would be likely released into the air during early manufacturing processes of mining and transporting [29.85]. In closed manufacturing facilities, indoor air control using ventilation systems, dust collectors, and personal protective equipment such as masks, coveralls, and gloves locally mitigate exposure of workers to MNMs released from manufacturing and related processes.
Structural Applications
MNMs could be released into the environment from buildings and associated infrastructures constructed with nanorelated materials. Use of NM-containing construction products makes individuals and communities in commercial and residential buildings more susceptible to exposure to MNMs [29.31]; For instance, they could be exposed to MNMs incorporated into wallpapers, glasses, paints, etc. through inhalation, dermal contact, or accidental digestion. Wear and abrasion of such structures by accidents (e.g., fire, car crash or earthquake) or weather (e.g., rainfall, snow, and wind) can cause immediate or gradual weathering of MNMs from basic construction materials, increasing the potential for adverse effects on environment and human health. TiO2 NPs used in exterior paints of building facades as a whitening pigment have been found in building runoff after rainfall [29.79]. MNMs suspended in runoff could be deposited on the topsoil in the surrounding area, and could be delivered to ecological receptors including plants, soil invertebrates, and soil microbes. MNMs released from structures could be transported through sewerage systems to enter adjacent surface waters, posing an immediate threat to aquatic habitats and deteriorating drinking-water quality. Also, MNMs could possibly infiltrate into the subsurface in significant quantities to reach and contaminate groundwater.
Structural Demolition
Partial or complete demolition of structures containing MNMs would also result in personal exposure to and environmental discharge of MNMs. Pulling down buildings and infrastructures proceeds in a relatively less controlled way, whether it is achieved by nonexplosive (using bulldozers, cranes, or hydraulic excavators) or explosive (or implosive) demolition practices. Consequently, it would be difficult to protect workers from the possible uptake of nano- and ultrafine particles and control their emission to the atmosphere during demolition activities. In addition to particulate emissions, water sprinkled on demolition waste to reduce dust levels could cause dissolution and suspension of MNMs and their subsequent transport to the aquatic environment. Demolition debris could emit hazardous wastes when NM-related components are not separated or eliminated beforehand. Proactive steps by trained specialists should be taken to preferentially dispose of NM-containing products such as windows, coatings/paintings, and sensor devices prior to the overall demolition operation.
Construction Waste Disposal
In general, construction (and demolition) wastes are transported to designated landfills equipped with engineered liner systems and leachate treatment facilities. However, environmental exposure to MNMs and associated adverse health effects would potentially arise if construction wastes containing MNMs are not properly treated and disposed of, e.g., dumped in shallow unlined pits or piled up in the open air. Furthermore, there is a high likelihood that construction debris, if disposed of with MNMs not encapsulated within sound structures, would discharge MNMs in the presence of prolonged exposure to rainfall or wind; For example, concrete debris exhibits high vulnerability to wind- or rainfall-induced erosion on the cleaved surfaces, which could lead to detachment of MNMs from NM-concrete debris in construction wastes and associated environmental release of free MNMs. Once MNMs in free particulate form are leached out from construction wastes, they would enter environmental media through various pathways. While MNMs initially undergo dispersion in air or in solution or suspension in runoff, it is highly probable that most MNMs released into the environment would penetrate into the subsurface and eventually reach groundwater aquifers. Despite limited mobility in soil (relative to air and aqueous media), CNTs and TiO2 NPs could migrate significant distances through porous media (soil and groundwater) in the presence of dissolved organic matter in the pore water [29.81,86]. For the overall risk assessment, further research should focus on the fate, behavior, and transport of MNMs in multiple environmental media [e.g., air, groundwater, sediment, (surface and subsurface) soil, or surface water] and environmental transformation processes for MNMs and associated modifications of their chemical structures, reactivity, mobility, bioavailability, and toxicity.
Potential Adverse Biological Impacts and Toxicity Mechanisms
The development of MNMs for the construction industry may produce unintentional environmental and human health impacts as a result of their unique chemical, biological, catalytic, and photoactive properties. Toxicological studies of these materials have shown that MNMs display a wide variety of toxicity mechanisms to organisms at every trophic level [29.87] (Fig. 29.5). Therefore, release from nanoenabled construction materials and structures could pose a risk to microorganisms (which provide valuable ecosystem services including primary productivity, nutrient cycling, and waste degradation) and higher organisms. These toxic responses include cell wall disruption (e.g., single-walled nanotubes, SWNTs), DNA/RNA damage (e.g., multi-walled nanotubes MWNT), direct cell membrane oxidation (e.g., nC60), dissolution of toxic metal components (e.g., QDs), and ROS-induced oxidative stress (e.g., TiO2) (Table 29.2).
TiO2
TiO2 NPs possess unique photocatalytic properties as UV light or sunlight irradiation of particles produces ROS, which can cause inflammation, cytotoxicity, and DNA damage in mammalian cells [29.88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98]. In addition, slight variations in TiO2 morphology affect their uptake through cell membranes by stimulation of phagocytosis, and encourage endogenous ROS generation as an immune response within the cell matrix [29.94,99]. Compared with their bulk counterparts, they exhibit differential toxicity [29.100]; for example, in one study, nano-TiO2 displayed greater induction of apoptosis and white blood cell generation [29.101].
TiO2 elicits similar ROS-derived toxicity in unicellular microorganisms. Solar irradiation enables the antimicrobial activity of TiO2 towards various bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, and Bacillus subtilis, and fungi, such as Aspergillus niger [29.13,102,103]. Membrane damage and particle adhesion are implicated as other mechanisms of toxicity [29.104]. Additionally, nano-TiO2 appears to have a synergistic effect with other co-contaminants; For example, nano-TiO2 toxicity and metal bioaccumulation were increased in the marine invertebrate Daphnia magna after simultaneous exposure with copper [29.105], and in carp species after simultaneously exposure with cadmium [29.106].
Quantum Dots
QDs contain toxic heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, and zinc in core/shell configurations [29.107] and have been recognized as among the most toxic materials [29.108]. The release of core metals has been accepted as the predominant mechanism of QDsʼ toxicity towards mammalian cells [29.109,110,111,112,113,114] and bacteria [29.115,116]. In human cells, toxicity can manifest as ROS damage to organelles and release of inflammation signaling proteins [29.117,118]. In whole-organism toxicity trials, mice displayed particle accumulation in the spleen, liver, and kidneys [29.119], while microorganisms, such as bacteria and algae, experience growth inhibition, cytotoxicity via lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress, and cellular particle uptake [29.115,116,120].
Toxicity, however, is not solely the result of metal ion release; some coating materials themselves may also be toxic [29.95,117,121]; For example, intact QDs can impair calcium influx and exocytotic mechanisms in murine brain cells [29.122]. It was also observed that eukaryotic cells experience oxidative stress, nucleic acid damage, and cytotoxicity resulting from internalization or membrane association with QDs [29.118,119,123]. Furthermore, gene expression studies in algae show that QDs elicit different responses compared with exposure to their respective ions [29.124].
Carbon Nanotubes
CNTs (SWNTs and MWNTs) pose a potential hazard [29.125] because they exert acute toxicity through ROS generation, inflammation, cell cycle arrest, and increased apoptosis in human and mammalian cells [29.126,127,128]. Trails of human cells exposed to chronically low doses show accumulation within cells and no adaptive protective mechanism development [29.129]. Extensive testing of whole organisms has been performed for CNTs. In rodent toxicity experiments, exposure through inhalation resulted in pulmonary toxicity such as inflammation, fibrosis, and epithelioid granulomas [29.125,130]. In contrast, exposure through oral dosing resulted in increased weight gain, morphological changes to the liver, and increases in lipid hydroperoxide [29.131].
Both SWNTs and MWNTs can also exhibit antimicrobial properties. Recent studies have shown CNTs to inhibit bacterial processes in river water, activated sludge, and wastewater effluent, which are likely sinks for CNTs released into the environment [29.132,133]. The mechanism of microbial toxicity of SWNTs appears to be direct damage to cell walls [29.133,134], while MWNTs cause toxicity via oxidative stress [29.135,136]. The antimicrobial properties appear to also be related to aggregate size [29.137] and interactions with bacterial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) [29.132].
C60 Fullerene
C60 water-stable aggregates (referred to as nC60 [29.138]) display toxicity to human and mammalian cells ranging from lipid peroxidation to necrosis and inflammatory responses [29.138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152]. Meta-analysis of rodent lung exposure data suggests that levels as low as the mg/m3 range can elicit a toxic response in mammalian cells [29.153,154]. nC60 aggregates display broad antimicrobial activity independent of the preparation method, i.e., solvent mediated, sonication, or prolonged stirring in water [29.145,147,155]. Recent studies confirmed that nC60 toxicity to bacteria was due to direct oxidation of the cell upon direct contact rather than by ROS-dependent oxidative stress [29.146,156]. Oxidative stress exerted by nC60 leads to lipid peroxidation, which is also responsible for cytotoxicity in eukaryotic organisms [29.141,151,157]. C60 derivatives such as fullerol and carboxyfullerene, designed to enhance their aqueous availability, are capable of puncturing the cell membrane [29.158] and behaving as oxidizing agents in biological systems [29.159].
SiO2
The effect of silica NPs on human and mammalian cells has been studied extensively because of their extensive use in biomedical and industrial applications [29.154,163,166,167,168,169,170,176,177]. Exposure to nanosized SiO2 triggers lipid peroxidation and membrane damage to human lung cancer cells [29.178], induces tumor necrosis genes in rats [29.170], and exerts carcinogenic activity [29.179]. While microbial toxicity occurs at higher doses as compared with mammalian cells [29.154,180], nanosized silica causes toxicity via ROS generation [29.154] and impedes cell division in unicellular algae [29.163]. While the exact mechanism of toxicity is unclear, it has been related to size and relative surface area, where particles with greater surface area were more toxic to both mammalian [29.181,182] and algal cells [29.183]. Regarding toxicity to microorganisms, studies suggest that toxicity is related to direct attachment and interaction of the particles [29.164,165,183].
Copper/Copper Oxide
Cu and CuO NPs induce oxidative stress, which can result in membrane, protein, and DNA damage in bacteria, algae, yeasts, mice, and human cells [29.91,97,160,171,184]. Oxidative toxicity results from ROS generation by copper ions via Fenton or Haber–Weiss reactions [29.185]. Furthermore, Cu NPs can exert toxicity over a range of lethal and nonlethal doses; For example, studies in mice showed that low, subtoxic doses of Cu NPs elicited the same cell stresses characteristic of higher doses [29.173]. While Cu NP toxicity is primarily linked to the bioavailability of free ions in the exposure media [29.161,172], recent studies have found that ions cannot explain the total toxicity, and unique nanoproperties may also contribute to toxicity [29.162].
Mitigation of Environmental and Health Impacts
The most pressing challenges facing the construction industry community in using nanoenabled construction materials include manufacturing of safe materials without significant modifications of their unique desired properties, applications of NM-containing materials with minimal hazard during their service life, and recycling and disposal to reduce waste materials and prevent soil and groundwater contamination. Thus, it is important to discern the chemical compositions, structures, and associated properties of NMs that are essential for their characteristic toxicological activities and environmental behaviors. Such investigation provides basic information for the design of safer products under consideration of exposure control (e.g., protective coatings and magnetic composites) and adoption of greener substitutes for toxic MNMs. The assessment of exposure routes, environmental fate, and transport for MNMs used in construction, with development of analytical methodologies to trace MNMs in multimedia, should be critical in controlling environmental pollution related to construction activities and establishing the strategy for waste management (e.g., separation/collection, recycle/reuse, and disposal).
Manufacturing
Chemical structure–activity relationships that elucidate which specific properties of MNMs are critically associated with their environmental behavior and toxicological activity are urgently required. In the absence of empirical data on various MNMs, these will provide a foundation to develop strategies to mitigate hazards and assess exposure scenarios and pathways. Physicochemical and structural properties associated with MNMs affect their fate, behavior, and transformation in environmental matrices (e.g., adsorption/desorption, aggregation, chemical redox reaction, deposition, or dissolution), which will directly bear on bioavailability, bioaccumulation, and toxicity [29.186].
Structure–activity relationships, with research into the toxicity mechanisms of MNMs, can offer basic design concepts for environmentally safe nanocomposites; For instance, encapsulation in polymer resins or surface functionalization hinders direct contact of carbon-based NMs (e.g., fullerene and SWNTs) as a key step in damage to bacterial cells, significantly diminishing their antimicrobial activity. Durable coating with inorganic film renders metal oxides (e.g., CuO and Fe3O4) and QDs resistant to weathering. Also, the predictive relationships may suggest the urgent need to remove potential toxic components from MNMs and switch to alternative materials.
Development of MNMs with easy degradation or recovery in response to specific environmental conditions may minimize environmental hazards in the event of accidental release during transportation, construction, or demolition. Incorporation of MNMs in pH- or temperature-responsive polymers can cause rapid hydrophobic conversion and resultant precipitation after their release into an aquatic environment, as encapsulation by nanomagnetite enables facile magnetic separation. Versatile MNMs can cover multiple functions to replace several MNMs without significant loss of functionalities (e.g., TiO2 NPs as white pigment and TiO2 coatings for light-transmittance control, self-cleaning, and superhydrophilicity), eventually decreasing the quantity of MNMs used in construction. Efforts to improve manufacturing processes should be initiated to increase production yields of NM-based construction products and highly promote their desirable properties with minimal generation of nanoscale wastes.
Application
In-depth studies should be carried out on the vulnerability of MNMs to redox reactions, corrosion and passivation, and photochemical and biological transformations encountered during the lifetime of nanoenabled products. The physical, chemical, and/or biological conversions may lead to modifications of MNMsʼ properties associated with their adverse biological effects and environmental mobility. Thus, it is important to identify the effects of physicochemical environmental parameters such as pH, salinity, and natural organic matter, and biological media compositions/metabolisms on the reactivity, distribution, bioavailability, and toxicity of MNMs.
Off-site fabrication, preassembly, and modularization of construction components containing MNMs in well-controlled conditions can minimize unwanted personal and environmental exposure. The effective longevity and projected life expectancy of MNM-containing construction products under conditions encountered should be considered for sustainable applications, based on laboratory and field studies to predict their resistance to aging, abrasion, chemical corrosion, cracking, and weathering. Leaching tests should be done to assess the possibility that MNMs incorporated into construction materials (e.g., TiO2 in self-cleaning exterior and pavements, QDs in photovoltaic cells, and CNTs in concrete) may undergo separation from the matrices in some damaging conditions (e.g., fire, water, wind, and flood), dispersing into the surrounding atmosphere or entering stormwater runoff.
Recycling/Disposal
Recycling of MNM-containing construction materials, which aims to reduce the consumption of raw MNMs and minimize MNM-containing wastes, requires various prerequisite steps, including the development of efficient strategies to extract and collect MNMs from complex matrices (with minimal modification of the pristine properties), characterization of spent MNMs and evaluation of their capacity for reactivation, and assessment of the applicability of the reclaimed MNMs in terms of their original functionalities.
Since collective efforts are still underway to establish regulatory frameworks to specifically address MNM disposal, there should be special considerations for safe MNM waste disposal and recycling procedures. In an effort to prevent potential secondary contamination through landfill clay liners to the underlying aquifer, barrier reinforcement will be recommended to prevent infiltration of NM leachate and resultant groundwater pollution. Product labeling to identify and trace MNMs and relevant guidelines are needed to ecoresponsibly dispose of and recycle waste products that include MNMs and waste MNMs themselves. Following disposal, appropriate interception and remediation approaches may need to be developed depending on the MNM source, release dynamics, and disposal scenario.
Conclusions
Due to the potential for enhancement in material properties and functionalities, application of nanotechnology in construction is expected to create intelligent materials and systems, present opportunities for energy savings, and enable environmentally responsible products, buildings, and construction activities. Smart, nanoenabled products can detect and respond to changes in indoor environmental conditions, providing user-adapted control of key environmental parameters, e.g., dimming light and altering temperature and humidity. Nanosensor assemblies embedded in buildings and infrastructures can remotely monitor and assess their structural health and vulnerability. Self-healing materials, which are still in early stages of development, are capable of autonomous crack management to recover original mechanical properties (e.g., preventing crack development through slow release of a bonding agent from polymer capillaries embedded in the concrete matrices).
Use of MNMs for thermal insulation (e.g., SiO2 NPs and aerogel) and light transmittance control (e.g., WO3 NPs) can significantly contribute to energy conservation, considering that energy consumption by commercial buildings and residential houses (including heating, lighting, and air ventilation) accounts for approximately 40% of all energy used in the USA. Incorporation of MNMs such as fullerenes, CNTs, and graphenes [29.46,47] advances energy conversion and storage systems including hydrocarbon-based fuel cells, thermo- and photovoltaic cells, batteries, and capacitors. Solar light activation of TiO2 to generate ROS enables pollution-controlling and self-cleaning coatings, reducing energy associated with maintenance for surface-treated pavements, windows, and walls [29.26,61,64]. Due to the improved resistance to abrasion, corrosion, fire, and fatigue, MNM-containing construction materials could possibly outperform conventional materials in terms of durability and longevity, indirectly reducing energy consumed to repair, restore, and replace damaged materials.
Applications of MNMs as alternatives to toxic components prevent environmental hazards through the potential discharge and exposure during manufacturing, transporting, construction and renovation, and disposal. The opportunities for material replacement include silver and iron oxide NPs for cadmium, cobalt, and lead as pigment in paint [29.12], silica NPs for polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) insulators [29.14], TiO2 NPs for perfluorochemicals as stain repellents [29.17], and CNTs for halogenated flame retardants [29.29]. QD-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [29.48,49] and CNT- or ZnO nanowire-based sensors and actuators [29.187,188] possibly mitigate hazards associated with accidental release of mercury used in fluorescent lamp bulbs, pressure gages, thermometers, and switches. MNM-containing products enable buildings and infrastructures to capture or exploit natural heat and light (e.g., heat-absorbing windows, solar panels, and energy coatings) [29.11,32], eventually reducing carbon emissions associated with heating and ventilation. Use of MNMs allows structural materials to be lighter and thinner without a significant loss of the desirable properties, mitigating wasteful use of raw materials and enabling resource-efficient production in construction.
As there are growing concerns that use of MNMs for the development of new construction products could increase possible environmental risk, it is critical to understand their potential mobility, properties, and impacts in and across air, water, soil, and biota. Analytical methodologies to detect and monitor MNMs (separate from or incorporated into construction materials) at environmentally relevant concentrations within complex environmental media and characterize their chemical and morphological features remain underdeveloped. Assessment of long-term global exposure to MNMs used in construction needs to be conducted, as the current focus of the potential adverse health effects is confined to manufacturing and construction workers. Considering that constructed infrastructure coexists with the natural environment, ecodesign strategies to enhance the environmental compatibility of materials and environmentally responsible lifecycle management of MNMs to minimize their unwanted environmental impacts also need to be prioritized. Overall, despite the current expectations regarding the promising opportunities of MNMs in construction, there are immediate concerns among the academic and industrial communities about the negative environmental implications. This highlights the need to encourage proactive research including green design and manufacturing, use and disposal practices, and recycling and reclamation strategies to ensure the ecoresponsibility and sustainability of both the nanotechnology and construction industries.
Abbreviations
- CNT:
-
carbon nanotube
- DNA:
-
deoxyribonucleic acid
- EPS:
-
extracellular polymeric substance
- HAZ:
-
heat-affected zone
- ITO:
-
indium tin oxide
- LBL:
-
layer-by-layer
- LED:
-
light-emitting diode
- MEMS:
-
microelectromechanical system
- MNM:
-
manufactured nanomaterials
- MWNT:
-
multiwalled nanotubes
- NEMS:
-
nanoelectromechanical system
- NM:
-
noble metal
- NP:
-
nanoparticle
- PCB:
-
polychlorinated biphenyl
- QD:
-
quantum dot
- RNA:
-
ribonucleic acid
- ROS:
-
reactive oxygen species
- SWNT:
-
single-walled nanotube
- UV:
-
ultraviolet
- rebar:
-
reinforcement bar
References
S.J. Tans, A.R.M. Verschueren, C. Dekker: Room-temperature transistor based on a single carbon nanotube, Nature 393, 49–52 (1998)
M.R. Hoffmann, S.T. Martin, W.Y. Choi, D.W. Bahnemann: Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis, Chem. Rev. 95, 69–96 (1995)
M.C. Daniel, D. Astruc: Gold nanoparticles: Assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology, Chem. Rev. 104, 293–346 (2004)
W.C.W. Chan, D.J. Maxwell, X.H. Gao, R.E. Bailey, M.Y. Han, S.M. Nie: Luminescent quantum dots for multiplexed biological detection and imaging, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13, 40–46 (2002)
A.S. Arico, P. Bruce, B. Scrosati, J.M. Tarascon, W. Van Schalkwijk: Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices, Nat. Mater. 4, 366–377 (2005)
Y.S. de Ibarra, J.J. Gaitero, E. Erkizia, I. Campillo: Atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation of cement pastes with nanotube dispersions, Phys. Status Solidi (a) 203, 1076–1081 (2006)
N. Guskos, G. Zolnierkiewicz, J. Typek, J. Blyszko, W. Kiernozycki, U. Narkiewicz: Ferromagnetic resonance and compressive strength study of cement mortars containing carbon encapsulated nickel and iron nanoparticles, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 23, 113–117 (2010)
S. Mann: Nanotechnology and construction, Nanoforum Report (2006) pp. 1–55
T. Sato, J.J. Beaudoin: The effect of nanosized CaCO_3 addition on the hydration of cement paste containing high volumes of fly ash, 12th Int. Congr. Chem. Cem., Montreal (2007) pp. 1–12
Z. Ge, Z. Gao: Applications of nanotechnology and nanomaterials in construction, 1st Int. Conf. Constr. Dev. Ctries., Karachi (2008) pp. 235–240
K. Adachi, M. Miratsu, T. Asahi: Absorption and scattering of near-infrared light by dispersed lanthanum hexaboride nanoparticles for solar control filters, J. Mater. Res. 25, 510–521 (2010)
A. Kumar, P.K. Vemula, P.M. Ajayan, G. John: Silver-nanoparticle-embedded antimicrobial paints based on vegetable oil, Nat. Mater. 7, 236–241 (2008)
E.J. Wolfrum, J. Huang, D.M. Blake, P.C. Maness, Z. Huang, J. Fiest, W.A. Jacoby: Photocatalytic oxidation of bacteria, bacterial and fungal spores, and model biofilm components to carbon dioxide on titanium dioxide-coated surfaces, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 3412–3419 (2002)
M. Gleiche, H. Hoffschulz, S. Lenhert: Nanotechnology in consumer products, Nanoforum Report (2006) pp. 1–30
P.V. Kamat: Quantum dot solar cells. Semiconductor nanocrystals as light harvesters, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 18737–18753 (2008)
V.S. Saji, J. Thomas: Nanomaterials for corrosion control, Curr. Sci. 92, 51–55 (2007)
G.X. Shen, Y.C. Chen, L. Lin, C.J. Lin, D. Scantlebury: Study on a hydrophobic nano-TiO_2 coating and its properties for corrosion protection of metals, Electrochim. Acta 50, 5083–5089 (2005)
G.B. Song, H.C. Gu, Y.L. Mo: Smart aggregates: Multifunctional sensors for concrete structures – A tutorial and a review, Smart Mater. Struct. 17, 1–17 (2008)
W. Zhang, J. Suhr, N. Koratkar: Carbon nanotube/polycarbonate composites as multifunctional strain sensors, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 6, 960–964 (2006)
P. van Broekhuizen, F. van Broekhuizen, R. Cornelissen, L. Reijnders: Use of nanomaterials in the European construction industry and some occupational health aspects thereof, J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 447–462 (2011)
J. Lee, S. Mahendra, P.J.J. Alvarez: Nanomaterials in the construction industry: A review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations, ACS Nano 4, 3580–3590 (2010)
J. Lee, S. Mahendra, P.J.J. Alvarez: Potential Environmental Impacts of Nanomaterials Used in the Construction Industry (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2009)
H. Li, M.H. Zhang, J.P. Ou: Abrasion resistance of concrete containing nanoparticles for pavement, Wear 260, 1262–1266 (2006)
L. Raki, J. Beaudoin, R. Alizadeh, J. Makar, T. Sato: Cement and concrete nanoscience and nanotechnology, Materials 3, 918–942 (2010)
K. Sobolev, M.F. Gutierrez: How nanotechnology can change the concrete world, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 84, 16–19 (2005)
H. Irie, K. Sunada, K. Hashimoto: Recent developments in TiO_2 photocatalysis: Novel applications to interior ecology materials and energy saving systems, Electrochemistry 72, 807–812 (2004)
J.M. Makar, J.J. Beaudoin: Carbon nanotubes and their application in the construction industry, 1st Int. Symp. Nanotechnol. Constr., Paisley (2003) pp. 331–341
R.H. Baughman, A.A. Zakhidov, W.A. de Heer: Carbon nanotubes – The route toward applications, Science 297, 787–792 (2002)
M. Moniruzzaman, K.I. Winey: Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes, Macromolecules 39, 5194–5205 (2006)
P. Podsiadlo, A.K. Kaushik, E.M. Arruda, A.M. Waas, B.S. Shim, J.D. Xu, H. Nandivada, B.G. Pumplin, J. Lahann, A. Ramamoorthy, N.A. Kotov: Ultrastrong and stiff layered polymer nanocomposites, Science 318, 80–83 (2007)
G. Elvin: Nanotechnology for green building, Green Technol. Forum (2007) pp. 1–96
H. Takeda, K. Adachi: Near infrared absorption of tungsten oxide nanoparticle dispersions, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 4059–4061 (2007)
T. Morimoto, H. Tomonaga, A. Mitani: Ultraviolet ray absorbing coatings on glass for automobiles, Thin Solid Films 351, 61–65 (1999)
B. Mahltig, H. Bottcher, K. Rauch, U. Dieckmann, R. Nitsche, T. Fritz: Optimized UV protecting coatings by combination of organic and inorganic UV absorbers, Thin Solid Films 485, 108–114 (2005)
T. He, J.N. Yao: Photochromism in composite and hybrid materials based on transition-metal oxides and polyoxometalates, Prog. Mater. Sci. 51, 810–879 (2006)
T. He, Y. Ma, Y.A. Cao, P. Jiang, X.T. Zhang, W.S. Yang, J.N. Yao: Enhancement effect of gold nanoparticles on the UV-light photochromism of molybdenum trioxide thin films, Langmuir 17, 8024–8027 (2001)
Y. Paz, Z. Luo, L. Rabenberg, A. Heller: Photooxidative self-cleaning transparent titanium-dioxide films on glass, J. Mater. Res. 10, 2842–2848 (1995)
M. Drajewicz, J. Wasylak: Properties of glass surface with nanoparticles aluminum compounds refined, Adv. Mater. Res. 39/40, 567–570 (2008)
Y.H. Lv, H. Liu, Z. Wang, L.J. Hao, J. Liu, Y.M. Wang, G.J. Du, D. Liu, J. Zhan, J.Y. Wang: Antibiotic glass slide coated with silver nanoparticles and its antimicrobial capabilities, Polym. Adv. Technol. 19, 1455–1460 (2008)
J. Niskanen, J. Shan, H. Tenhu, H. Jiang, E. Kauppinen, V. Barranco, F. Pico, K. Yliniemi, K. Kontturi: Synthesis of copolymer-stabilized silver nanoparticles for coating materials, Colloid Polym. Sci. 288, 543–553 (2010)
V. Sambhy, M.M. MacBride, B.R. Peterson, A. Sen: Silver bromide nanoparticle/polymer composites: Dual action tunable antimicrobial materials, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 9798–9808 (2006)
K. Page, R.G. Palgrave, I.P. Parkin, M. Wilson, S.L.P. Savin, A.V. Chadwick: Titania and silver-titania composite films on glass-potent antimicrobial coatings, J. Mater. Chem. 17, 95–104 (2007)
X.M. Shi, T.A. Nguyen, Z.Y. Suo, Y.J. Liu, R. Avci: Effect of nanoparticles on the anticorrosion and mechanical properties of epoxy coating, Surf. Coat. Technol. 204, 237–245 (2009)
Z.Y. Wang, E.H. Han, F.C. Liu, W. Ke: Fire and corrosion resistances of intumescent nanocoating containing nano-SiO_2 in salt spray condition, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 26, 75–81 (2010)
Z.Y. Wang, E.H. Han, F.C. Liu, L. Ke: Thermal behavior of nano-TiO_2 in fire-resistant coating, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 23, 547–550 (2007)
P. Brown, K. Takechi, P.V. Kamat: Single-walled carbon nanotube scaffolds for dye-sensitized solar cells, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 4776–4782 (2008)
P.V. Kamat, M. Haria, S. Hotchandani: C_60 cluster as an electron shuttle in a Ru(II)-polypyridyl sensitizer-based photochemical solar cell, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 5166–5170 (2004)
J.L. Zhao, J.A. Bardecker, A.M. Munro, M.S. Liu, Y.H. Niu, I.K. Ding, J.D. Luo, B.Q. Chen, A.K.Y. Jen, D.S. Ginger: Efficient CdSe/CdS quantum dot light-emitting diodes using a thermally polymerized hole transport layer, Nano Lett. 6, 463–467 (2006)
H.S. Chen, S.J.J. Wang, C.J. Lo, J.Y. Chi: White-light emission from organics-capped ZnSe quantum dots and application in white-light-emitting diodes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 131905–131907 (2005)
K.J. Loh, J. Kim, J.P. Lynch, N.W.S. Kam, N.A. Kotov: Multifunctional layer-by-layer carbon nanotube-polyelectrolyte thin films for strain and corrosion sensing, Smart Mater. Struct. 16, 429–438 (2007)
J. E. Kloeppel: Mimicking biological systems, composite material heals itself, http://www.news.uiuc.edu/scitips/01/0214selfheal.html
A. Cwirzen, K. Habermehl-Cwirzen, V. Penttala: Surface decoration of carbon nanotubes and mechanical properties of cement/carbon nanotube composites, Adv. Cem. Res. 20, 65–73 (2008)
J.M. Makar, G.W. Chan: Growth of cement hydration products on single walled carbon nanotubes, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92, 1303–1310 (2009)
T. Muromachi, T. Tsujino, K. Kamitani, K. Maeda: Application of functional coatings by sol-gel method, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 40, 267–272 (2006)
S.S. Kanu, R. Binions: Thin films for solar control applications, Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 19–44 (2010)
Z.G. Zhao, Z.F. Liu, M. Miyauchi: Tailored remote photochromic coloration of in situ synthesized CdS quantum dot loaded WO_3 films, Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 4162–4167 (2010)
G. Walters, I.P. Parkin: The incorporation of noble metal nanoparticles into host matrix thin films: Synthesis, characterisation and applications, J. Mater. Chem. 19, 574–590 (2009)
Y. Ohko, T. Tatsuma, T. Fujii, K. Naoi, C. Niwa, Y. Kubota, A. Fujishima: Multicolour photochromism of TiO_2 films loaded with silver nanoparticles, Nat. Mater. 2, 29–31 (2003)
M. Saeli, C. Piccirillo, I.P. Parkin, I. Ridley, R. Binions: Nanocomposite thermochromic thin films and their application in energy-efficient glazing, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 94, 141–151 (2010)
R. Arutjunjan, T. Markova, I. Halopenen, I. Maksimov, A. Tutunnikov, O. Yanush: Smart thermochromic glazing for energy saving window applications, Proc. SPIE 5946, 94618 (2005)
Q.H. Mu, Y.G. Li, H.Z. Wang, Q.H. Zhang: Self-organized TiO_2 nanorod arrays on glass substrate for self-cleaning antireflection coatings, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 365, 308–313 (2012)
X.D. Wang, J. Shen: Sol-gel derived durable antireflective coating for solar glass, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 53, 322–327 (2010)
A. Mills, S. LeHunte: An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 108, 1–35 (1997)
X.T. Zhang, O. Sato, M. Taguchi, Y. Einaga, T. Murakami, A. Fujishima: Self-cleaning particle coating with antireflection properties, Chem. Mater. 17, 696–700 (2005)
M. Takeuchi, K. Sakamoto, G. Martra, S. Coluccia, M. Anpo: Mechanism of photoinduced superhydrophilicity on the TiO_2 photocatalyst surface, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 15422–15428 (2005)
A.I. Kontos, A.G. Kontos, D.S. Tsoukleris, G.D. Vlachos, P. Falaras: Superhydrophilicity and photocatalytic property of nanocrystalline titania sol-gel films, Thin Solid Films 515, 7370–7375 (2007)
M. Miyauchi: Visible light induced super-hydrophilicity on single crystalline TiO_2 nanoparticles and WO_3 layered thin films, J. Mater. Chem. 18, 1858–1864 (2008)
K.S. Guan, B.J. Lu, Y.S. Yin: Enhanced effect and mechanism of SiO_2 addition in super-hydrophilic property of TiO_2 films, Surf. Coat. Technol. 173, 219–223 (2003)
S.A. Ruffolo, M.F. Russa, M. Malagodi, C.O. Rossi, A.M. Palermo, G.M. Crisci: ZnO and ZnTiO3 nanopowders for antimicrobial stone coating, Appl. Phys. A 100, 829–834 (2010)
E. Martines, K. Seunarine, H. Morgan, N. Gadegaard, C.D.W. Wilkinson, M.O. Riehle: Superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity of regular nanopatterns, Nano Lett. 5, 2097–2103 (2005)
H. Park, K.Y. Kim, W. Choi: Photoelectrochemical approach for metal corrosion prevention using a semiconductor photoanode, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 4775–4781 (2002)
M. Saafi, P. Romine: Nano- and microtechnology, Concr. Int. 27, 28–34 (2005)
M. Saafi, P. Romine: Preliminary evaluation of MEMS devices for early age concrete property monitoring, Cem. Concr. Res. 35, 2158–2164 (2005)
Y.F. Zhang: Piezoelectric paint sensor for real-time structural health monitoring, Smart Mater. Struct. 5765, 1095–1103 (2005)
M.R. Wiesner, G.V. Lowry, P. Alvarez, D. Dionysiou, P. Biswas: Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials, Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4336–4345 (2006)
N. Solovitch, J. Labille, J. Rose, P. Chaurand, D. Borschneck, M.R. Wiesner, J.Y. Bottero: Concurrent aggregation and deposition of TiO_2 nanoparticles in a sandy porous media, Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 4897–4902 (2010)
A.R. Petosa, D.P. Jaisi, I.R. Quevedo, M. Elimelech, N. Tufenkji: Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: Role of physicochemical interactions, Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 6532–6549 (2010)
B. Nowack, T.D. Bucheli: Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment, Environ. Pollut. 150, 5–22 (2007)
R. Kaegi, A. Ulrich, B. Sinnet, R. Vonbank, A. Wichser, S. Zuleeg, H. Simmler, S. Brunner, H. Vonmont, M. Burkhardt, M. Boller: Synthetic TiO_2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment, Environ. Pollut. 156, 233–239 (2008)
K.A.D. Guzman, M.P. Finnegan, J.F. Banfield: Influence of surface potential on aggregation and transport of titania nanoparticles, Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 7688–7693 (2006)
B.J.R. Thio, D.X. Zhou, A.A. Keller: Influence of natural organic matter on the aggregation and deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, J. Hazard. Mater. 189, 556–563 (2011)
J. Fang, X.Q. Shan, B. Wen, J.M. Lin, G. Owens: Stability of titania nanoparticles in soil suspensions and transport in saturated homogeneous soil columns, Environ. Pollut. 157, 1101–1109 (2009)
D.R. Johnson, M.M. Methner, A.J. Kennedy, J.A. Steevens: Potential for occupational exposure to engineered carbon-based nanomaterials in environmental laboratory studies, Environ. Health Perspect. 118, 49–54 (2010)
DuPont: DuPont Nanomaterial risk assessment worksheet – DuPont light stabilizer (2007) pp. 1–52
DuPont: DuPont crystar 6920 PET poly-(ethylene terephthalate) resin with sepiolite clay, Pangel S-9 as an encapsulated nanodispersed filler (2008) pp. 1–35
G.R. Aiken, H. Hsu-Kim, J.N. Ryan: Influence of dissolved organic matter on the environmental fate of metals, nanoparticles, and colloids, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 3196–3201 (2011)
S.J. Klaine, P.J.J. Alvarez, G.E. Batley, T.F. Fernandes, R.D. Handy, D.Y. Lyon, S. Mahendra, M.J. McLaughlin, J.R. Lead: Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27, 1825–1851 (2008)
X.S. Zhu, L. Zhu, Z.H. Duan, R.Q. Qi, Y. Li, Y.P. Lang: Comparative toxicity of several metal oxide nanoparticle aqueous suspensions to zebrafish (Danio rerio) early developmental stage, J. Environ. Sci. Health A 43, 278–284 (2008)
Q.W. Zhang, Y. Kusaka, K. Sato, K. Nakakuki, N. Kohyama, K. Donaldson: Differences in the extent of inflammation caused by intratracheal exposure to three ultrafine metals: Role of free radicals, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 53, 423–438 (1998)
L.L. Zhang, R. Bai, B. Li, C. Ge, J.F. Du, Y. Liu, L. Le Guyader, Y.L. Zhao, Y.C. Wu, S.D. He, Y.M. Ma, C.Y. Chen: Rutile TiO_2 particles exert size and surface coating dependent retention and lesions on the murine brain, Toxicol. Lett. 207, 78–81 (2011)
Y.G. Wang, W.G. Aker, H.M. Hwang, C.G. Yedjou, H.T. Yu, P.B. Tchounwou: A study of the mechanism of in vitro cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles using catfish primary hepatocytes and human HepG2 cells, Sci. Total Environ. 409, 4753–4762 (2011)
R. Tedja, C. Marquis, M. Lim, R. Amal: Biological impacts of TiO_2 on human lung cell lines A549 and H1299: Particle size distribution effects, J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 3801–3813 (2011)
C.M. Sayes, R. Wahi, P.A. Kurian, Y.P. Liu, J.L. West, K.D. Ausman, D.B. Warheit, V.L. Colvin: Correlating nanoscale titania structure with toxicity: A cytotoxicity and inflammatory response study with human dermal fibroblasts and human lung epithelial cells, Toxicol. Sci. 92, 174–185 (2006)
J.F. Reeves, S.J. Davies, N.J.F. Dodd, A.N. Jha: Hydroxyl radicals are associated with titanium dioxide (TiO_2) nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage in fish cells, Mutat. Res. 640, 113–122 (2008)
S. Park, Y.K. Lee, M. Jung, K.H. Kim, N. Chung, E.K. Ahn, Y. Lim, K.H. Lee: Cellular toxicity of various inhalable metal nanoparticles on human alveolar epithelial cells, Inhal. Toxicol. 19, 59–65 (2007)
G. Oberdorster, R.M. Gelein, J. Ferin, B. Weiss: Association of particulate air-pollution and acute mortality – Involvement of ultrafine particles, Inhal. Toxicol. 7, 111–124 (1995)
H.L. Karlsson, P. Cronholm, J. Gustafsson, L. Moller: Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: A comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 21, 1726–1732 (2008)
R.D. Handy, T.B. Henry, T.M. Scown, B.D. Johnston, C.R. Tyler: Manufactured nanoparticles: Their uptake and effects on fish – A mechanistic analysis, Ecotoxicology 17, 396–409 (2008)
T.C. Long, N. Saleh, R.D. Tilton, G.V. Lowry, B. Veronesi: Titanium dioxide (P25) produces reactive oxygen species in immortalized brain microglia (BV2): Implications for nanoparticle neurotoxicity, Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4346–4352 (2006)
A. Nel, T. Xia, L. Madler, N. Li: Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel, Science 311, 622–627 (2006)
Y. Zhang, W. Yu, X. Jiang, K. Lv, S. Sun, F. Zhang: Analysis of the cytotoxicity of differentially sized titanium dioxide nanoparticles in murine MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts, J. Mater. Sci. 22, 1933–1945 (2011)
A. Rincon, C. Pulgarin: Effect of pH, inorganic ions, organic matter and H2O2 on E. coli K12 photocatalytic inactivation by TiO_2-implications in solar water disinfection, Appl. Catal. B 51, 283–302 (2004)
A. Rincon, C. Pulgarin: Bactericidal action of illuminated TiO_2 on pure Escherichia coli and natural bacterial consortia: Post-irradiation events in the dark and assessment of the effective disinfection time, Appl. Catal. B 49, 99–112 (2004)
N.B. Hartmann, F. Von der Kammer, T. Hofmann, M. Baalousha, S. Ottofuelling, A. Baun: Algal testing of titanium dioxide nanoparticles-Testing considerations, inhibitory effects and modification of cadmium bioavailability, Toxicology 269, 190–197 (2010)
W. Fan, M. Cui, H. Liu, C. Wang, Z. Shi, C. Tan, X. Yang: Nano-TiO_2 enhances the toxicity of copper in natural water to Daphnia magna, Environ. Pollut. 159, 729–734 (2011)
X. Zhang, H. Sun, Z. Zhang, Q. Niu, Y. Chen, J.C. Crittenden: Enhanced bioaccumulation of cadmium in carp in the presence of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Chemosphere 67, 160–166 (2007)
W.W. Yu, E. Chang, J.C. Falkner, J.Y. Zhang, A.M. Al-Somali, C.M. Sayes, J. Johns, R. Drezek, V.L. Colvin: Forming biocompatible and nonaggregated nanocrystals in water using amphiphilic polymers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 2871–2879 (2007)
S. Zuin, C. Micheletti, A. Critto, G. Pojana, H. Johnston, V. Stone, L. Tran, A. Marcomini: Weight of evidence approach for the relative hazard ranking of nanomaterials, Nanotoxicology 5, 445–458 (2011)
A. Shiohara, A. Hoshino, K. Hanaki, K. Suzuki, K. Yamamoto: On the cyto-toxicity caused by quantum dots, Microbiol. Immunol. 48, 669–675 (2004)
Z.S. Lu, C.M. Li, H.F. Bao, Y. Qiao, Y.H. Toh, X. Yang: Mechanism of antimicrobial activity of CdTe quantum dots, Langmuir 24, 5445–5452 (2008)
C. Kirchner, T. Liedl, S. Kudera, T. Pellegrino, A.M. Javier, H.E. Gaub, S. Stolzle, N. Fertig, W.J. Parak: Cytotoxicity of colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles, Nano Lett. 5, 331–338 (2005)
R. Hardman: A toxicologic review of quantum dots: Toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors, Environ. Health Perspect. 114, 165–172 (2006)
A.M. Derfus, W.C.W. Chan, S.N. Bhatia: Probing the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum dots, Nano Lett. 4, 11–18 (2004)
K.E. Cha, H. Myung: Cytotoxic effects of nanoparticles assessed in vitro and in vivo, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17, 1573–1578 (2007)
J.A. Kloepfer, R.E. Mielke, J.L. Nadeau: Uptake of CdSe and CdSe/ZnS quantum dots into bacteria via purine-dependent mechanisms, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 2548–2557 (2005)
S. Mahendra, H.G. Zhu, V.L. Colvin, P.J. Alvarez: Quantum dot weathering results in microbial toxicity, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 9424–9430 (2008)
J.P. Ryman-Rasmussen, J.E. Riviere, N.A. Monteiro-Riviere: Surface coatings determine cytotoxicity and irritation potential of quantum dot nanoparticles in epidermal keratinocytes, J. Investig. Dermatol. 127, 143–153 (2007)
E. Chang, N. Thekkek, W.W. Yu, V.L. Colvin, R. Drezek: Evaluation of quantum dot cytotoxicity based on intracellular uptake, Small 2, 1412–1417 (2006)
P. Lin, J.-W. Chen, L.W. Chang, J.-P. Wu, L. Redding, H. Chang, T.-K. Yeh, C.-S. Yang, M.-H. Tsai, H.-J. Wang, Y.-C. Kuo, R.S.H. Yang: Computational and ultrastructural toxicology of a nanoparticle, quantum dot 705, in mice, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 6264–6270 (2008)
J.X. Wang, X.Z. Zhang, Y.S. Chen, M. Sommerfeld, Q. Hu: Toxicity assessment of manufactured nanomaterials using the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chemosphere 73, 1121–1128 (2008)
A. Hoshino, K. Fujioka, T. Oku, M. Suga, Y.F. Sasaki, T. Ohta, M. Yasuhara, K. Suzuki, K. Yamamoto: Physicochemical properties and cellular toxicity of nanocrystal quantum dots depend on their surface modification, Nano Lett. 4, 2163–2169 (2004)
S. Gosso, D. Gavello, C.N.G. Giachello, C. Franchino, E. Carbone, V. Carabelli: The effect of CdSe-ZnS quantum dots on calcium currents and catecholamine secretion in mouse chromaffin cells, Biomaterials 32, 9040–9050 (2011)
J. Lovric, S.J. Cho, F.M. Winnik, D. Maysinger: Unmodified cadmium telluride quantum dots induce reactive oxygen species formation leading to multiple organelle damage and cell death, Chem. Biol. 12, 1227–1234 (2005)
R.F. Domingos, D.F. Simon, C. Hauser, K.J. Wilkinson: Bioaccumulation and effects of CdTe/CdS quantum dots on Chlamydomonas reinhardtii – Nanoparticles or the free ions?, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 7664–7669 (2011)
C.W. Lam, J.T. James, R. McCluskey, S. Arepalli, R.L. Hunter: A review of carbon nanotube toxicity and assessment of potential occupational and environmental health risks, Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 36, 189–217 (2006)
W. Wei, A. Sethuraman, C. Jin, N.A. Monteiro-Riviere, R.J. Narayan: Biological properties of carbon nanotubes, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 7, 1284–1297 (2007)
G. Jia, H.F. Wang, L. Yan, X. Wang, R.J. Pei, T. Yan, Y.L. Zhao, X.B. Guo: Cytotoxicity of carbon nanomaterials: Single wall nanotube, multi wall nanotube, and fullerene, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 1378–1383 (2005)
L.H. Ding, J. Stilwell, T.T. Zhang, O. Elboudwarej, H.J. Jiang, J.P. Selegue, P.A. Cooke, J.W. Gray, F.Q.F. Chen: Molecular characterization of the cytotoxic mechanism of multiwall carbon nanotubes and nanoonions on human skin fibroblast, Nano Lett. 5, 2448–2464 (2005)
T. Thurnherr, C. Brandenberger, K. Fischer, L. Diener, P. Manser, X. Maeder-Althaus, J.P. Kaiser, H.F. Krug, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, P. Wick: A comparison of acute and long-term effects of industrial multiwalled carbon nanotubes on human lung and immune cells in vitro, Toxicol. Lett. 200, 176–186 (2011)
T. Oyabu, T. Myojo, Y. Morimoto, A. Ogami, M. Hirohashi, M. Yamamoto, M. Todoroki, Y. Mizuguchi, M. Hashiba, B.W. Lee, M. Shimada, W.N. Wang, K. Uchida, S. Endoh, N. Kobayashi, K. Yamamoto, K. Fujita, K. Mizuno, M. Inada, T. Nakazato, J. Nakanishi, I. Tanaka: Biopersistence of inhaled MWCNT in rat lungs in a 4-week well-characterized exposure, Inhal. Toxicol. 23, 784–791 (2011)
A.K. Patlolla, A. Berry, P.B. Tchounwou: Study of hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress in male Swiss-Webster mice exposed to functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Mol. Cell. Biochem. 358, 189–199 (2011)
L.A. Luongo, X.Q. Zhang: Toxicity of carbon nanotubes to the activated sludge process, J. Hazard. Mater. 178, 356–362 (2010)
S. Kang, M.S. Mauter, M. Elimelech: Microbial cytotoxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials: Implications for river water and wastewater effluent, Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 2648–2653 (2009)
S. Kang, M. Pinault, L.D. Pfefferle, M. Elimelech: Single-walled carbon nanotubes exhibit strong antimicrobial activity, Langmuir 23, 8670–8673 (2007)
S. Kang, M.S. Mauter, M. Elimelech: Physicochemical determinants of multiwalled carbon nanotube bacterial cytotoxicity, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 7528–7534 (2008)
S. Kang, M. Herzberg, D.F. Rodrigues, M. Elimelech: Antibacterial effects of carbon nanotubes: Size does matter, Langmuir 24, 6409–6413 (2008)
S.R. Chae, M. Therezien, J.F. Budarz, L. Wessel, S.H. Lin, Y. Xiao, M.R. Wiesner: Comparison of the photosensitivity and bacterial toxicity of spherical and tubular fullerenes of variable aggregate size, J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 5121–5127 (2011)
J.D. Fortner, D.Y. Lyon, C.M. Sayes, A.M. Boyd, J.C. Falkner, E.M. Hotze, L.B. Alemany, Y.J. Tao, W. Guo, K.D. Ausman, V.L. Colvin, J.B. Hughes: C_60 in water: Nanocrystal formation and microbial response, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 4307–4316 (2005)
W.A. Scrivens, J.M. Tour, K.E. Creek, L. Pirisi: Synthesis of 14C-labeled C_60, its suspension in water, and its uptake by human keratinocytes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 4517–4518 (1994)
C.M. Sayes, A.A. Marchione, K.L. Reed, D.B. Warheit: Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessments of C_60 water suspensions in rats: Few differences in fullerene toxicity in vivo in contrast to in vitro profiles, Nano Lett. 7, 2399–2406 (2007)
C.M. Sayes, A.M. Gobin, K.D. Ausman, J. Mendeza, J.L. West, V.L. Colvin: Nano-C_60 cytotoxicity is due to lipid peroxidation, Biomaterials 26, 7587–7595 (2005)
C.M. Sayes, J.D. Fortner, W. Guo, D. Lyon, A.M. Boyd, K.C. Ausman, Y.J. Tao, B. Sitharaman, L.J. Wilson, J.B. Hughes, J.L. West, V.L. Colvin: The differential cytotoxicity of water-soluble fullerenes, Nano Lett. 4, 1881–1887 (2004)
S.P. Rozhkov, A.S. Goryunov, G.A. Sukhanova, A.G. Borisova, N.N. Rozhkova, G.V. Andrievsky: Protein interaction with hydrated C_60 fullerene in aqueous solutions, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 303, 562–566 (2003)
E.J. Park, H. Kim, Y. Kim, J. Yi, K. Choi, K. Park: Carbon fullerenes (C_60s) can induce inflammatory responses in the lung of mice, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 244, 226–233 (2010)
D.Y. Lyon, J.D. Fortner, C.M. Sayes, V.L. Colvin, J.B. Hughes: Bacterial cell association and antimicrobial activity of a C_60 water suspension, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 24, 2757–2762 (2005)
D.Y. Lyon, L. Brunet, G.W. Hinkal, M.R. Wiesner, P.J.J. Alvarez: Antibacterial activity of fullerene water suspensions (nC60) is not due to ROS-mediated damage, Nano Lett. 8, 1539–1543 (2008)
D.Y. Lyon, P.J. Alvarez: How a fullerene water suspension kills bacteria: Exploring three possible mechanisms, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 20, 1991–1991 (2007)
M. Kovochich, B. Espinasse, M. Auffan, E.M. Hotze, L. Wessel, T. Xia, A.E. Nel, M.R. Wiesner: Comparative toxicity of C_60 aggregates toward mammalian cells: Role of tetrahydrofuran (THF) decomposition, Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6378–6384 (2009)
S. Kato, H. Aoshima, Y. Saitoh, N. Miwa: Biological safety of lipofullerene composed of squalane and fullerene-C_60 upon mutagenesis, photocytotoxicity, and permeability into the human skin tissue, Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 104, 483–487 (2009)
S. Kato, H. Aoshima, Y. Saitoh, N. Miwa: Biological safety of liposome-fullerene consisting of hydrogenated lecithin, glycine soja sterols, and fullerene-C_60 upon photocytotoxicity and bacterial reverse mutagenicity, Toxicol. Ind. Health 25, 197–203 (2009)
A. Isakovic, Z. Markovic, B. Todorovic-Markovic, N. Nikolic, S. Vranjes-Djuric, M. Mirkovic, M. Dramicanin, L. Harhaji, N. Raicevic, Z. Nikolic, V. Trajkovic: Distinct cytotoxic mechanisms of pristine versus hydroxylated fullerene, Toxicol. Sci. 91, 173–183 (2006)
R. Bullard-Dillard, K.E. Creek, W.A. Scrivens, J.M. Tour: Tissue sites of uptake of 14C-labeled C_60, Bioorg. Chem. 24, 376–385 (1996)
N. Shinohara, M. Gamo, J. Nakanishi: Fullerene C_60: Inhalation hazard assessment and derivation of a period-limited acceptable exposure level, Toxicol. Sci. 123, 576–589 (2011)
L.K. Adams, D.Y. Lyon, P.J.J. Alvarez: Comparative eco-toxicity of nanoscale TiO_2, SiO_2, and ZnO water suspensions, Water Res. 40, 3527–3532 (2006)
D.Y. Lyon, L.K. Adams, J.C. Falkner, P.J.J. Alvarez: Antibacterial activity of fullerene water suspensions: Effects of preparation method and particle size, Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4360–4366 (2006)
J. Fang, D.Y. Lyon, M.R. Wiesner, J. Dong, P.J.J. Alvarez: Effect of a fullerene water suspension on bacterial phospholipids and membrane phase behavior, Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 2636–2642 (2007)
E. Oberdörster: Manufactured nanomaterials (fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass, Environ. Health Perspect. 112, 1058–1062 (2004)
N. Tsao, T. Luh, C. Chou, T. Chang, J. Wu, C. Liu, H. Lei: In vitro action of carboxyfullerene, J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49, 641–649 (2002)
J.P. Kamat, T.P.A. Devasagayam, K.I. Priyadarsini, H. Mohan: Reactive oxygen species mediated membrane damage induced by fullerene derivatives and its possible biological implications, Toxicology 155, 55–61 (2000)
C. Blaise, F. Gagne, J.F. Ferard, P. Eullaffroy: Ecotoxicity of selected nanomaterials to aquatic organisms, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23, 591–598 (2008)
V. Aruoja, H.C. Dubourguier, K. Kasemets, A. Kahru: Toxicity of nanoparticles of CuO, ZnO and TiO_2 to microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Sci. Total Environ. 407, 1461–1468 (2009)
K. Kasemets, A. Ivask, H.C. Dubourguier, A. Kahru: Toxicity of nanoparticles of ZnO, CuO and TiO_2 to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Toxicol. in Vitro 23, 1116–1122 (2009)
K. Fujiwara, H. Suematsu, E. Kiyomiya, M. Aoki, M. Sato, N. Moritoki: Size-dependent toxicity of silica nanoparticles to Chlorella kessleri, J. Environ. Sci. Health A 43, 1167–1173 (2008)
C. Wei, Y. Zhang, J. Guo, B. Han, X. Yang, J. Yuan: Effects of silica nanoparticles on growth and photosynthetic pigment contents of Scenedesmus obliquus, J. Environ. Sci. 22, 155–160 (2010)
W. Jiang, H. Mashayekhi, B. Xing: Bacterial toxicity comparison between nano- and micro-scaled oxide particles, Environ. Pollut. 157, 1619–1625 (2009)
M. Lucarelli, A.M. Gatti, G. Savarino, P. Quattroni, L. Martinelli, E. Monari, D. Boraschi: Innate defence functions of macrophages can be biased by nanosized ceramic and metallic particles, Eur. Cytokine Netw. 15, 339–346 (2004)
Y. Li, L. Sun, M.H. Jin, Z.J. Du, X.M. Liu, C.X. Guo, Y.B. Li, P.L. Huang, Z.W. Sun: Size-dependent cytotoxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in human hepatoma HepG2 cells, Toxicol. in Vitro 25, 1343–1352 (2011)
D. Dutta, S.K. Sundaram, J.G. Teeguarden, B.J. Riley, L.S. Fifield, J.M. Jacobs, S.R. Addleman, G.A. Kaysen, B.M. Moudgil, T.J. Weber: Adsorbed proteins influence the biological activity and molecular targeting of nanomaterials, Toxicol. Sci. 100, 303–315 (2007)
H.-S. Choi, Y.-J. Kim, M. Song, M.-K. Song, J.-C. Ryu: Genotoxicity of nanosilica in mammalian cell lines, Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 3, 7–13 (2011)
G. Attik, R. Brown, P. Jackson, O. Creutzenberg, I. Aboukhamis, B.H. Rihn: Internalization, cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression in rat alveolar macrophages exposed to various dusts occurring in the ceramics industry, Inhal. Toxicol. 20, 1101–1112 (2008)
Z. Chen, H.A. Meng, G.M. Xing, C.Y. Chen, Y.L. Zhao, G.A. Jia, T.C. Wang, H. Yuan, C. Ye, F. Zhao, Z.F. Chai, C.F. Zhu, X.H. Fang, B.C. Ma, L.J. Wan: Acute toxicological effects of copper nanoparticles in vivo, Toxicol. Lett. 163, 109–120 (2006)
M. Heinlaan, A. Ivask, I. Blinova, H.-C. Dubourguier, A. Kahru: Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO_2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans, Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus, Chemosphere 71, 1308–1316 (2008)
B.H. Yang, Q.J. Wang, R.H. Lei, C.Q. Wu, C. Shi, Q.X. Wang, Y. Yuan, Y. Wang, Y.W. Luo, Z.H. Hu, H.Z. Ma, M.Y. Liao: Systems toxicology used in nanotoxicology: Mechanistic insights into the hepatotoxicity of nanocopper particles from toxicogenomics, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10, 8527–8537 (2010)
H. Meng, Z. Chen, G.M. Xing, H. Yuan, C.Y. Chen, F. Zhao, C.C. Zhang, Y.L. Zhao: Ultrahigh reactivity provokes nanotoxicity: Explanation of oral toxicity of nanocopper particles, Toxicol. Lett. 175, 102–110 (2007)
M. Midander, P. Cronholm, H.L. Karlsson, K. Elihn, L. Moller, C. Leygraf, I.O. Wallinder: Surface characteristics, copper release, and toxicity of nano- and micrometer-sized copper and copper(II) oxide particles: A cross-disciplinary study, Small 5, 389–399 (2009)
Z.Y. Wang, K. Zhang, J. Zhao, X.Y. Liu, B.S. Xing: Adsorption and inhibition of butyrylcholinesterase by different engineered nanoparticles, Chemosphere 79, 86–92 (2010)
A.T. Bauer, E.A. Strozyk, C. Gorzelanny, C. Westerhausen, A. Desch, M.F. Schneider, S.W. Schneider: Cytotoxicity of silica nanoparticles through exocytosis of von Willebrand factor and necrotic cell death in primary human endothelial cells, Biomaterials 32, 8385–8393 (2011)
W.S. Lin, Y.W. Huang, X.D. Zhou, Y.F. Ma: Toxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles in human lung cancer cells, Int. J. Toxicol. 25, 451–457 (2006)
IARC: Silica, Some Silicates, Coal Dust and Para-Aramid Fibrils, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 68 (International Agency for Research on Cancer World Health Organization, Lyon 1997) p. 41
N. Kumar, V. Shah, V.K. Walker: Perturbation of an arctic soil microbial community by metal nanoparticles, J. Hazard. Mater. 190, 816–822 (2011)
V. Rabolli, L.C.J. Thomassen, F. Uwambayinema, J.A. Martens, D. Lison: The cytotoxic activity of amorphous silica nanoparticles is mainly influenced by surface area and not by aggregation, Toxicol. Lett. 206, 197–203 (2011)
V. Rabolli, L.C.J. Thomassen, C. Princen, D. Napierska, L. Gonzalez, M. Kirsch-Volders, P.H. Hoet, F. Huaux, C.E.A. Kirschhock, J.A. Martens, D. Lison: Influence of size, surface area and microporosity on the in vitro cytotoxic activity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in different cell types, Nanotoxicology 4, 307–318 (2010)
K. Van Hoecke, K.A.C. De Schamphelaere, P. Van der Meeren, S. Lcucas, C.R. Janssen: Ecotoxicity of silica nanoparticles to the green alga pseudokirchneriella subcapitata: Importance of surface area, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27, 1948–1957 (2008)
W.M. Lee, Y.J. An, H. Yoon, H.S. Kweon: Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): Plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27, 1915–1921 (2008)
M.E. Letelier, A.M. Lepe, M. Faundez, J. Salazar, R. Marin, P. Aracena, H. Speisky: Possible mechanisms underlying copper-induced damage in biological membranes leading to cellular toxicity, Chem. Biol. Interact. 151, 71–82 (2005)
P.J.J. Alvarez, V. Colvin, J. Lead, V. Stone: Research priorities to advance eco-responsible nanotechnology, ACS Nano 3, 1616–1619 (2009)
S. Ghosh, A.K. Sood, N. Kumar: Carbon nanotube flow sensors, Science 299, 1042–1044 (2003)
Z.L. Wang, J. Song: Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays, Science 312, 242–246 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, J., Lee, S., Chung, E., Reyes, V.C., Mahendra, S. (2013). Nanomaterials in Civil Engineering. In: Vajtai, R. (eds) Springer Handbook of Nanomaterials. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20595-8_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20595-8_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20594-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20595-8
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)