Abstract
Jonathan Hutchinson (1890) described the first patient with the characteristic signs of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and called the disease “arteritis of the aged.” Horton, Magath, and Brown (1932 and 1934) published the clinical and histological signs of the temporal artery inflammation as a clinical entity for the first time. The disease occurs much more often in Caucasians and in cool climates, compared to people from other parts such as Africa or Asia, and is much more frequent in women.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Visual Loss
- Giant Cell Arteritis
- Temporal Artery
- Superficial Temporal Artery
- Central Retinal Artery Occlusion
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
FormalPara Core Messages-
Iritis may be the first sign of ocular ischemia in giant cell arteritis (GCA).
-
The main signs and diagnostic features of GCA are headaches with an increased ESR and CRP in a person older than 50 years of age, with histologically inflammation of the superficial temporal artery biopsy.
-
Additional signs and symptoms such as polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and jaw claudication are also very important signs for diagnosis.
-
Histology of the superficial temporal artery reveals lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration of the vessel wall; giant cells are not present in every vessel wall specimen.
1 Definition
Jonathan Hutchinson (1890) described the first patient with the characteristic signs of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and called the disease “arteritis of the aged.” Horton, Magath, and Brown (1932 and 1934) published the clinical and histological signs of the temporal artery inflammation as a clinical entity for the first time. The disease occurs much more often in Caucasians and in cool climates, compared to people from other parts such as Africa or Asia, and is much more frequent in women.
The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis [8] are:
-
1.
Age at disease onset ≥50 years
-
2.
New headache
-
3.
Temporal artery abnormality
-
4.
Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate
-
5.
Abnormal artery biopsy
The incidence of GCA varies geographically. The disease predominantly affects subjects of Northern European descent with estimates of about 20 cases annually per 100,000 persons older than 50 years of age [11].
2 Clinical Manifestations
2.1 General Involvement
Patients complain about headache and myalgia mainly in the shoulder girdle. Typically, they report jaw claudication when chewing and pain in the neck may also occur as first symptoms. General signs and symptoms develop earlier than ocular ones. Inflammations of all arteries can occur. Life-threatening manifestations are aortitis and inflammation of the coronary arteries.
2.2 Ocular Involvement
Ocular symptoms may present as amaurosis fugax (AF) and visual blurring, which occur much more often than other symptoms such as eye pain, peri- or retrobulbar pain, or visual loss for several hours which can be preceded by diplopia.
Ocular signs are inflammation of posterior ciliary arteries and anterior ischemic neuropathy (AION) (Fig. 65.1) which occurs more often than central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). Ischemic choroidopathy is not an unusual finding (Fig. 65.2). Ischemic iritis or even panuveitis may rarely occur in GCA. Other signs of ischemia are ocular hypotony and cotton-wool spots in the retina [13, 14]. Rajesh and Cole [12] described cells in the anterior chamber and vitreous as well as nongranulomatous keratic precipitates. The development of iritis with anterior synechiae and gelatinous deposits on the trabecular meshwork with secondary glaucoma in both eyes were also found. Bilateral swelling of the papilla was observed.
Rarely described are branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), posterior ischemic neuropathy (PION), and eye muscle paresis.
In a retrospective study, Hayreh et al. [6] investigated 170 patients with biopsy-confirmed GCA. Eighty-five patients (50 %) presented with ocular involvement. Visual loss of varying severity occurred in 83 patients (97.6 %), AF in 30.6 %, diplopia in 5.9 %, and ocular pain in 8.2 %. AION was found in 81.2 %, CRAO in 14.1 %, PION in 7.1 %, and ocular ischemic syndrome in 1.2 %. A delayed perfusion of the choroidal circulation was reported by several authors which implies involvement of the ophthalmic artery [3, 4, 16].
The occult form of the disease presents as a quiet ischemic blindness in one or both eyes, without classical symptoms and signs (headache, weight loss, malaise, and fever). According to Hayreh [5], a fifth of patients with visual loss have occult GCA.
3 Etiology and Pathogenesis
Cellular infiltrates are composed of CD4+ T lymphocytes, macrophages, and multinucleated giant cells. The pre-activated T lymphocytes in the adventitia enter the vessel wall through the vasa vasorum. Adventitial CD4+ T cells intermingle with activated macrophages which produce interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-6 [17]. It seems that a distinctive population of vascular dendritic cells (DCs) are present in the vessel wall infiltrates. DCs mainly are present in the adventitia but were also found in the media. It is suggested that DCs participate in the fusion process of phagocytes [18]. The major pathogenic mechanism in GCA is the intimal hyperplasia leading to vessel stenosis. With this process neoangiogenesis develops with new blood vessel formation in avascular zones of the arterial wall. Why uveitis is initiated remains unclear. The cells could very well come from a breakdown of the blood-ocular barrier due to ischemia.
4 Diagnosis
The diagnosis of GCA is clinical, but the gold standard for diagnosis is the temporal artery biopsy. Histology of the superficial temporal artery reveals lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration of the vessel wall; giant cells are not present in every biopsy specimen.
In every patient with an acute visual deterioration, ESR and CRP should immediately be requested. Additional diagnostic tests are imaging methods, such as ultrasonography (US) of the superficial temporal artery and examination with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1, 2, 10]. Gadolinium causes vascular contrast enhancement in temporal arteries due to an inflammatory process. Color duplex ultrasonography (US) combines the imaging capabilities of B-mode US with the flow-velocity determinations of Doppler sonography, and it permits the accurate assessment of both the arterial anatomy and the flow characteristics of the vessel at specific sites [15].
5 Differential Diagnosis
GCA is a well-known masquerader. Especially in the case of an occult GCA, diagnosis of a noninflammatory AION due to arteriosclerosis is often made.
6 Treatment
The only proven treatment for GCA is the administration of high-dose systemic corticosteroids. Four different strategies are recommended:
-
1.
Hayreh and Zimmerman [7] initially give one intravenous megadose (equivalent to 1 g of prednisone) followed by high-dose (80–120 mg) oral prednisone in patients who present with history of AF or complete or marked loss of vision in one eye or in early signs of involvement of the second eye.
-
2.
Kawasaki and Purvin [9] mentioned the treatment with intravenous steroids (methylprednisolone 250 mg every 6 h) for the first 3–5 days and then continue with high-dose oral prednisone. This prednisone treatment is maintained at least 4–6 weeks. If inflammatory signs and symptoms have subsided and the disease activity (ESR and CRP) has normalized, steroid tapering is necessary. In most patients, the initial reduction in dosage is 5–10 mg/month to a daily dosage toward 20–30 mg. The rate of reduction should further proceed cautiously, usually by 2.5–5 mg/month. When the daily dose is 10–15 mg, tapering should continue by only 1 mg/month. Steroid tapering is highly individualized.
-
3.
Weyand and Goronzy [19] recommended an initial therapy with prednisone at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight per day. But given the risk of irreversible ischemic complications, intravenous pulse therapy (e.g., 1000 mg of methylprednisolone per day for three consecutive days) is the recommendation by these authors.
-
4.
In a meta-analysis Yates et al. [20] mentioned that prednisolone combined with adjunctive immunosuppression, such as treatment with dapsone, infliximab, adalimumab or hydroxychloroquine is not superior to prednisolone alone.
Threatening visual loss in the first few days is essential for the protection of vision of the second eye. However, during long-term treatment, the dose should be reduced as low as possible – depending on the clinical signs. Hayreh and Zimmerman [7] found that there is little justification for giving aspirin or other platelet-aggregating agents or steroid-sparing agents to prevent visual loss in GCA.
7 Prognosis
GCA can be a devastating disease resulting in complete blindness if not promptly treated. In case of an early diagnosis without visual loss, the initiation of anti-inflammatory treatment will result in a good visual prognosis. In case of visual loss in one eye, high-dose corticosteroids can prevent blindness in the fellow eye. However, increase of visual acuity in a patient with visual loss has been rarely observed despite high-dose corticosteroid treatment.
Take Home Pearls
-
Giant cell arteritis is one of the prime ophthalmological emergencies because of its threatening visual loss.
-
Additional diagnostic procedures are color duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
-
Early treatment with high-dose systemic corticosteroids is important for the prognosis of GCA.
References
Anders HJ, Sigl T, Sander A et al (1999) Gadolinium contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal artery in giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol 26:2287–2288
Bley TA, Wieben O, Vaith P et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging depicts mural inflammation of the temporal artery in giant cell arteritis. Letter to the editor. Arthritis Rheum 51:1062–1063
Cohen S, Gardner F (2006) Bilateral choroidal ischemia in giant cell arteritis. Arch Ophthalmol 124:922
Fastenberg DM, Feldon SE (1982) Reversible choroidal vascular insufficiency without infarction in temporal arteritis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 218:327–330
Hayreh SS (2000) Steroid therapy for visual loss in patients with giant-cell arteritis. Lancet 355:1572–1573
Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, Zimmerman B (1998) Ocular manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Am J Ophthalmol 125:509–520
Hayreh SS, Zimmerman B (2003) Management of giant cell arteritis. Our 27- year clinical study: new light on old controversies. Ophthalmologica 217:239–259
Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 33:1122–1128
Kawasaki A, Purvin V (2009) Giant cell arteritis: an updated review. Acta Ophthalmol 87:13–32
Mitomo T, Funuy T, Takahashi Y et al (1998) Giant cell arteritis and magnetic resonance angiography. Arthritis Rheum 41:1702
Nordborg E, Nordborg C (2003) Giant cell arteritis: epidemiological clues to its pathogenesis and an update on its treatment. Rheumatology 42:413–421
Rajesh CV, Cole M (2000) Panuveitis as a presenting feature of giant cell arteritis. Br J Ophthalmol 84:340
Schmidt D (2005) Ocular ischemia syndrome – a malignant course of giant cell arteritis. Eur J Med Res 10:233–242
Schmidt D (2008) The mystery of cotton-wool spots – a review of recent and historical descriptions. Eur J Med Res 13:231–266
Schmidt D, Hetzel A, Reinhard M, Auw-Haedrich C (2003) Comparison between color duplex ultrasonography and histology of the temporal artery in cranial arteritis (giant cell arteritis). Eur J Med Res 8:1–7
Siatkowski RM, Gass JD, Glaser JS et al (1993) Fluorescein angiography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Am J Ophthalmol 115:57–63
Weyand CM (2000) The pathogenesis of giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol 27:517–522
Weyand CM, Ma-Krupa W, Pryshchep O et al (2005) Vascular dendritic cells in giant cell arteritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1062:195–208
Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ (2014) Giant-cell arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica. N Engl J Med 371:50–57
Yates M, Loke YK, Watts RA, MacGregor AJ (2014) Prednisolone combined with adjunctive immunosuppression is not superior to prednisolone alone in terms of efficacy and safety in giant cell arteritis: meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol 33:227–236
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmidt, D. (2016). Giant Cell Arteritis. In: Zierhut, M., Pavesio, C., Ohno, S., Orefice, F., Rao, N. (eds) Intraocular Inflammation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75387-2_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75387-2_65
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75385-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75387-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)