Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mit Tieren denken: Die Soziologie der nicht-menschlichen Tiere in der Gesellschaft

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Das Mensch-Tier-Verhältnis

Zusammenfassung

Den unterschiedlichen Formen „mit Tieren zu denken“ nachzugehen, eröffnet Möglichkeiten, unser grundlegendes Verständnis der sozialen Ordnung und unsere authentischen Einstellungen gegenüber Menschen in den Blick zu bekommen sowie die Instrumentalisierung von Tieren in unserer Gesellschaft zu erkennen. Der Beitrag geht sowohl auf die Ablehnung der Soziologie als auch auf ihr wachsendes Interesse ein, sich mit Mensch-Tier-Interaktionen zu beschäftigen. Bei Letzterem werden zentrale Fragen und Ergebnisse dieses jungen Forschungsfeldes (vorwiegend) aus der angloamerikanischen Literatur dargestellt (Bereiche: Gewalt- und Bewegungsforschung, Vegetarismus/Veganismus, Tiere in der Unterhaltungsbranche, Verhältnis von Menschen zu Wildtieren, Ambivalenz der Mensch-Tier-Verhältnisse sowie kognitive Fähigkeiten von Tieren).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Adams, C. (1994): Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals. New York: Con-tinuum

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. (1995): The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York: Continuum Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C./Donovan, J. (Hrsg.) (1995): Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, G. (Hrsg.) (1990): Advances in Medical Sociology 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S. (2009): The Use of Historic and Contemporary Justifications for Killing Wolves by the Palin Administration. In: Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 20. 6–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Alger, J./Alger, S. (2003): Cat Culture: The Social World of a Cat Shelter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • American Veterinary Medical Association (2003): U.S. Pet Ownership and Demographic Source-book. Schaumberg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A. (1988): Sacrificial Symbolism in Animal Experimentation: Object or Pet? In: Anthrozoös 2. 98–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A. (1990): Moral Elevation in Medical Research. In: Albrecht, G. (Hrsg.) (1990): 189–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A. (1991a): Going into the Closet with Science: Information Control Among Animal Experimenters. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 20. 306–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A. (1991b): Coping with Euthanasia: A Case Study of Shelter Culture. In: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 198. 1176–1180

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A. (1994): The Ethical Socialization of Animal Researchers. In: Lab Animal 23 (6). 30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A. (2003): Ethnozoology and the Future of Sociology. In: International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23. 26–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke A. (2004): Brute Force: Animal Police and the Challenge of Cruelty. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke A./Hafferty, F. (1996): From Apprehension to Fascination with ‚Dog Lab‘: The Use of Absolutions by Medical Students. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 25. 191–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A./Sanders, C. (1996): Regarding Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A./Sanders C., (Hrsg.) (2009): Between the Species: Readings in Human-Animal Relations. Boston: Pearson

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A./Levin, J./Luke, C./Ascione, F. (1999): The Relationship of Animal Abuse to Violence and Other Forms of Antisocial Behavior. In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence 14. 963–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascione, F./Arkow, P. (1999): Child Abuse, Domestic Violence and Animal Abuse: Linking the Circles of Compassion for Prevention and Intervention. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascione, F./Shapiro, K. (2009): People and Animals, Kindness and Cruelty: Research Directions and Policy Implications. In: Journal of Social Issues 65 (3). 569–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M./Young, K. (2009): Greyhound Racing and Sports-Related Violence. In: Arluke/ Sanders (Hrsg.) (2009): 213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood-Harvey, D. (2005): Death or Declaw: Dealing with Moral Ambiguity in a Veterinary Hospital. In: Society and Animals 13. 315–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, R. (1929): The Culture of Canines. In: Sociology and Social Research 13. 545–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcom, S./Arluke, A. (2001): Animal Adoption as Negotiated Order: A Comparison of Open Ver-sus Traditional Shelter Approaches. In: Anthrozoos 14. 135–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcombe, J. (1999): Animals and Society Courses: A Growing Trend in Post-Secondary Education. In: Society and Animals 7. 229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, M. (Hrsg.) (2007): The Encyclopedia of Human-Animal Relations. Westport, CT: Greenwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, J. (2008): Cat and Mouse. In: Cultural Studies 22. 431–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkeland, J. (1993): Ecofeminism: Linking Theory and Practice. In: Gaard (Hrsg.) (1993): 13–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R./Taylor, S. (1989): Relationships with Severely Disabled People: The Social Construction of Humanness. In: Social Problems 36. 135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovick, M./Dmitry, M. (2010): Animal Protection Movements: History, Policy, Practice. In: Journal of Social Policy Studies 8 (2). 227–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, S. (1993): Zoos and Animal Rights: The Ethics of Keeping Animals. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, K. (2009): Human-Horse Communication. In: Arluke, A./Sanders, C. (Hrsg.) (2009): 315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C. (1979): The Zoological Connection: Animal Related Human Behavior. In: Social Forces 58. 399–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, C. (1991): Down the Backstretch: Racing and the American Dream. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. (1977): Animals and Men: Their Relationship as Reflected in Western Art from Prehistory to the Present Day. New York: Morrow

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobbe, F. ([1872] 2003): The Consciousness of Dogs. In: Sociological Origins 3. 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, S. (2009): Swimming with Dolphins. In: Arluke/Sanders (Hrsg.) (2009): 113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, D./Worden, S. (1996): Marketing Deviance: The Selling of Cockfighting. In: Society and Animals 4. 211–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1976): Animals are Machines. In: Regan/Singer (Hrsg.) (1976): 60–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Deviney, E./Dickert, J./Lockwood, R. (1983): The Care of Pets within Abusing Families. In: International Journal of the Study of Animal Problems 4. 321–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T./Frisch, A./Kalof, L./Stern, P./Guagnano. G,. (1995): Values and Vegetarianism: An Exploratory Analysis. In: Rural Sociology 60. 533–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizard, J. (1994): Going Wild: Hunting, Animal Rights and the Contested Meaning of Nature. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, J. W. (1992): Attitudes toward Animal Use. In: Anthrozoos 5. 32–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundes, A. (Hrsg.) (1994): The Cockfight: A Casebook. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D./Williams, C. (2004): A View from the Bridge: Subjectivity, Embodiment and Animal Minds. In: Anthrozoös 17. 210–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Einwohner, R. (2009): The Protest Effectiveness of Four Animal Rights Campaigns. In: Arluke/ Sanders (Hrsg.) (2009): 361–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G./Wolch, J./Emel, J. (2009): Race, Place, and the Human-Animal Divide. In: Arluke/Sanders (Hrsg.) (2009): 21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington, F. (1990): The Rock Creek Rodeo: Excess and Constraint in Men’s Lives. In: American Ethnologist 17. 628–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, M. (2005): Pampered Pooches Nestle in Lap of Luxury. In: USA Today. February 11-13. 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G./Christoforides, L. (1991): Dirty Birds, Filthy Immigrants, and the English Sparrow War: Metaphorical Linkage in Constructing Social Problems. In: Symbolic Interaction 14. 375–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, C. (2000): Woman’s Best Friend: Pet Abuse and the Role of Companion Animals in the Lives of Battered Women. In: Violence Against Women 6. 162–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, C. (2009): Battered Women and Their Companion Animals. In: Arluke/Sanders (Hrsg.) (2009): 98–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C./Evans, R. (1998): Dogmen: The Rationalization of Deviance. In: Society and Animals 6. 203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaard, G. (1993): Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, and Nature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, S./Herzog, H. (1992): Ethical Ideology, Animal Rights Activism, and Attitudes Toward the Treatment of Animals. In: Ethics and Behavior 2. 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, S./Herzog, H. (1998): Attitudes and Dispositional Optimism of Animal Rights Demonstrators. In: Society and Animals 6. 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, D. (1994): A World Without Words: The Social Construction of Children Born Deaf and Blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Granfield, R./Colomy, P. (2009): The Transformation of Wildlife Law in the Vanishing Wilderness. In: Arluke/Sanders (Hrsg.): 134–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, J. (1997): Hearts and Minds: The Controversy over Laboratory Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, L./Arluke, A. (1998): Pushing the Boundaries: Scientists in the Public Arena. In: Hart (Hrsg.): 145–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J. (1986): The Social Preservation of Mind: The Alzheimer’s Disease Experience. Symbolic Interaction 9. 37–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. (Hrsg.) (2009): Responsible Conduct in Research. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Herda-Rapp, A./Goedeke, T. (2005): Mad About Wildlife: Looking at the Social Conflict Over Wildlife. Boston: Brill

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. (1993): The Movement is My Life: The Psychology of Animal Rights Activism. Journal of Social Issues 49. 103–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H./Gavin, S. (1992): Animals, Archetypes, and Popular Culture: Tales from the Tabloid Press. In: Anthrozoös 5. 77–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H./Betchart, N./Pittman, R. (1991): Gender, Sex Role Orientation, and Attitudes Toward Animals. In: Anthrozoos 4. 184–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E./Sanders. C. (1997): Motion Pictures as Metaphoric Consumption: How Animal Narratives Teach Us to be Human. Semiotica 15. 53–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoage, R. J. (Hrsg.) (1989): Perceptions of Animals in American Culture. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson-West, P. (2007): Beasts and Boundaries: An Introduction to Animals in Sociology, Science and Society. In: Qualitative Sociology Review 3 (1). 23–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, R. (1994): Hunting and Fishing for Sport. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Popular Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, L. (2004): If You Tame Me: Understanding Our Connection with Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, L. (2007): The Question of Animal Selves: Implications for Sociological Knowledge and Practice. In: Qualitative Sociology Review 3. 5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, L. (2009): How Shelters ‘Think’ about Clients’ Needs and Unwanted Pets. In: Arluke/ Sanders (Hrsg.) (2009): 258–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J./Nelkin D., (1992): The Animal Rights Crusade. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerolmack, C. (2007): Animal Practices, Ethnicity, and Community: The Turkish Pigeon Handlers of Berlin. In: American Sociological Review 72. 874–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerolmack, C. (2008): How Pigeons Became Rats: The Cultural-Spatial Logic of Problem Animals. In: Social Problems 55 (1). 72–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L. (2007). Animals in Art. In: Bekoff, M. (Hrsg.) (2007): 85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L./Fitzgerald, A. (2003): Reading the Trophy: Exploring the Display of Dead Animals in Hunting Magazines. Visual Studies 18. 112–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L./Taylor, C. (2007): The Discourse of Dog Fighting. Humanity and Society 31 (4). 319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L./Dietz, T./Stern, P./Guagnano, G. (1999): Social Psychological and Structural Influences on Vegetarian Beliefs. In: Rural Sociology 64. 500–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S./Felthous, A. (1985): Childhood Cruelty toward Animals among Criminal and Noncriminals. Human Relations 38. 1113–1129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheel, M. (1995): License to Kill: An Ecofeminist Critique of Hunters’ Discourse. In: Adams/ Donovan (Hrsg.) (1995): 85–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, C. (1999): Gender, Views of Nature, and Support for Animal Rights. Society and Animals 7. 179–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E. (1982): Rodeo: An Anthropologist Looks at the Wild and the Tame. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E. (1988): Those Who Dislike Pets. Anthrozoös 1. 147–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. E./Kalof. L,. (1999): The Animal Text: Message and Meaning in Television Advertisements. In: The Sociological Quarterly 40. 565–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1965): Das Ende des Totemismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Magdorff, J./Barnett, S. (1989): Self-Imaging and Animals in TV Ads. In: Hoage (Hrsg.) (1989): 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, H. ([1865] 2003): Dogs: Unauthorized, Unclaimed, and Vagabond. In: Sociological Origins 3. 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvin, G. (1988): Bullfight. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, S./Herzog, H. (1997): Personality and Attitudes Toward the Treatment of Animals. In: Society and Animals 5. 99–115

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, C. (2007): Sport and Animals. In: Bekoff (Hrsg.) (2007): 1321–1325

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1962): Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1964): George Herbert Mead on Social Psychology (Anselm Strauss, Hrsg.): Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz-Perez, L./Heide, K. (2003): Animal Cruelty: Pathways to Violence Against People. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. (1991): Blood Sport. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (2007): Animals as Food: Veganism. In: Bekoff (Hrsg.) (2007): 46–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, L. (1997): Framing Cruelty: The Construction of Duck Shooting as a Social Problem. In: Society and Animals 5. 137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, E. (1998): Children and Animals. Boulder, CO: Westview Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nibert, D. (2002): Animal Rights, Human Rights: Entanglements of Oppression and Liberation. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, D./Herzog, H. (1996): Ethical Ideology and Moral Persuasion: Personal Moral Philosophy, Gender, and Judgments of Pro- and Anti-Animal Research Propaganda. In: Society and Animals 4. 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Noske, B. (1990): The Question of Anthropocentrism in Anthropology. In: Focal 13. 66–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Noske, B. (1997): Beyond Boundaries: Humans and Animals. Montreal: Black Rose Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1974): The Sociology of Housework. New York: Pantheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Peek, C./Bell, N./Dunham, C. (1996): Gender, Gender Ideology, and Animal Rights Advocacy. In: Gender and Society 10: 464–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Peek, C./Dunham, C./Dietz, B. (1997): Gender, Relational Role Orientation, and Affinity for Animal Rights. In: Sex Roles 37. 905–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Peek, C./Konty, M./Frazier, T. (1997): Religion and Ideological Support for Social Movements: The Case of Animal Rights. In: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36. 429–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. (1993): Savages, Drunks, and Lab Animals: The Researcher’s Perception of Pain. In: Society and Animals 1. 61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. (1994): Proper Names and the Social Construction of Biography: The Negative Case of Laboratory Animals. In: Qualitative Sociology 17. 119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, D. (2009): Representations of the Animal World on the Discovery Channel. In: Arluke/ Sanders (Hrsg.) (2009): 235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Plous, S. (1998): Signs of Change Within the Animal Rights Movement: Results from a follow-up Survey of Activists. In: Journal of Comparative Psychology 112. 48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlisk, J. (1999): Animal Abuse and Family Violence. In: Ascione/Arkow (Hrsg.) (1999): 168–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Randour, M. L. (2007): Integrating Animals into the Family Violence Paradigm: Implications for Policy and Professional Standards. In: Journal of Emotional Abuse 7 (3). 97–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T./Singer, P. (Hrsg.) (1976): Animal Rights and Human Obligations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. (1993): Understanding Dogs: Caretakers’ Attributions of Mindedness in Canine-Human Relationships. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22. 205–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. (1994): Annoying Owners: Routine Interactions with Problematic Clients in a General Veterinary Practice. In: Qualitative Sociology 17. 159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. (1995): Killing with Kindness: Veterinary Euthanasia and the Social Construction of Personhood. In: Sociological Forum 10. 195–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. (1999): Understanding Dogs: Living and Working with Canine Companions. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. (2000): The Impact of Guide Dogs on the Identity of People with Visual Impairments. Anthrozoös 13. 131–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. (2003): Actions Speak Louder than Words: Close Relationships Between Humans and Nonhuman Animals. Symbolic Interaction 26. 405–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. (2006): “The Dog You Deserve”: Ambivalence in the K-9 Officer/Patrol Dog Relation-ship. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35. 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarce, R. (2005): More than Wolves at the Door: Reconstructing Community Amidst a Wildlife Controversy. In: Herda-Rapp/Goedeke (Hrsg.) (2005): 123–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. (1968): The Racing Game. Chicago: Aldine

    Google Scholar 

  • Selzer, M. (1972): “Kike!“ A Documentary History of Anti-Semitism in America. New York: World Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, J. (2009): Having Our Dogs and Eating Them Too: Why Animals Are a Social Issue. In: Journal of Social Issues 65 (3). 633–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanklin, E. (1985): Sustenance and Symbol: Anthropological Studies of Domesticated Animals. In: Annual Review of Anthropology 14. 375–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, S. (1988): Animal Liberators: Research and Morality. Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. (1985): The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Tester, K. (1992): Animals and Society. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Twining, H./Arluke, A./Patronek, G. (2000): Managing the Stigma of Outlaw Breeds: The Case of Pit Bull Owners. In: Society and Animals 8. 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1964): The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, R. (2005): Se ntient Commodities and Productive Paradoxes: The Ambiguous Nature of Human-Livestock Relations in Northeast Scotland. In: Journal of Rural Studies 21. 213–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, R. (2010): Livestock/Deadstock: Working with Farm Animals from Birth to Slaughter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Winders, B./Nibert, D. (2009): Expanding Meat Consumption and Animal Oppression. In: Arluke/ Sanders (Hrsg.) (2009): 183–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. (2009): Zoopolis. In: Arluke/Sanders (Hrsg.) (2009): 123–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J./Hensley, C. (2003): From Animal Cruelty to Serial Murder: Applying the Graduation Hypothesis. In: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47. 71–88

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boston, USA

    Arnold Arluke Ph.D.

  2. Storrs, USA

    Dr. Clinton Sanders Ph.D.

  3. Springfield, USA

    Patricia Morris Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Arnold Arluke Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Clinton Sanders Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia Morris Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold Arluke Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dortmund, Germany

    Renate Brucker

  2. Bochum, Germany

    Melanie Bujok

  3. Dortmund, Germany

    Birgit Mütherich

  4. Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsfor, Köln, Germany

    Martin Seeliger

  5. Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaft, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Frank Thieme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arluke, A., Sanders, C., Morris, P. (2015). Mit Tieren denken: Die Soziologie der nicht-menschlichen Tiere in der Gesellschaft. In: Brucker, R., Bujok, M., Mütherich, B., Seeliger, M., Thieme, F. (eds) Das Mensch-Tier-Verhältnis. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94110-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94110-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16916-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-94110-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation