Skip to main content

Anthropologische Aspekte des Verhältnisses von Mensch und Natur(-landschaft)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landschaft, Identität und Gesundheit

Zusammenfassung

Das folgende Kapitel gibt einen kurzen Überblick über einschlägige anthropologische Theorien zum Mensch-Landschafts-Verhältnis, die den umweltpsychologischen, geographischen und gesundheitswissenschaftlichen Diskurs in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten nachhaltig beeinflussten. Zunächst wird die Entwicklung des Mensch-Landschafts-Verhältnisses betrachtet, anschließend werden die wichtigsten evolutionsbasierten Theorien vorgestellt und kritisch vor dem Hintergrund der gesundheitlichen Wirkungen von Landschaften reflektiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Altman, I., und Wohlwill, J.F. (1983). Behavior and the Natural Environment. Human Behavior and Environment 6. New York, London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, J. (1975a). The experience of landscape. London, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, J. (1975b). Landscape evaluation: the theoretical vacuum. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 66, 120-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bixler, R.D., & Floyd, M.F. (1997). Nature is scary, disgusting and uncomfortable. Environment and Behavior 29, 443-467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D., & Kearns, R. (2007). Ambiguous Landscapes: Sun, Risk and Recreation on New Zealand Beaches. In Williams A. (Hrsg.), Therapeutic Landscapes (S. 15-32). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conradson, D. (2005). Landscape, care and the relational self: therapeutic encounters in rural England. Health & Place 11, 337-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumes, D. (1998). Nature as medicine: the healing power of the wilderness. Alternative Therapies in Health & Medicine 4, 79-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, L.M., & Anderson, D.h. (1999). A qualitative exploration of the wilderness experience as a source of spiritual inspiration. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, 21-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesler, W. (1992). Therapeutic landscapes: medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Social Science & Medicine 34, 735-746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Psychology Press Classic Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., Böök, A., Gavril, J., Olsson, T., & Garling, T. (1996). Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 37, 378-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G.W., & Garling. T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 14, 175-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G.W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behaviour 23, 3-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 159-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, T.R., Maguire, C.P., & Nebel, M.B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 159-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, T.R., & Miller, E.J. (1998). The role of mystery in perceived danger and environmental preference. Environment and Behaviour 30, 429-449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberg, C. (2016). Gesundheit und Wohlbefinden. In U. Gebhard, & T. Kistemann (Hrsg.), Landschaft – Identität – Gesundheit. Zum Konzept der Therapeutischen Landschaften (S. 63-69). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (1985). The analysis of perception via preference: a strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape Planning 12, 161-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (1992). The restorative environment: nature and human experience. In Relf, D. (Hrsg.), The role of horticulture in human well-being and social development (S. 134-142). Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behaviour 19, 3-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1995). The urban forest as a source of psychological well-being. In: G.A. Bradley (Hrsg.), Urban Forest Landscapes: Integrating multidisciplinary perspectives (S. 101-108). Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., und Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., und Peterson, C. (1993). Health and environment: A psychological analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 26, 17-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S.R. (1993). Biophilia and the Conservation Ethic. In S.R. Kellert & E.O. Wilson (Hrsg.), The Biophilia hypothesis (S. 42-69). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistemann, T., & Claßen, T. (2003). Naturschutz und Gesundheitsschutz: Konkurrenz oder Synergie? In Erdmann, K.-H. & Schell, C. (Hrsg.), Zukunftsfaktor Natur – Blickpunkt Mensch (S. 245-256). Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Bundesamt für Naturschutz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistemann, T. (2016). Das Konzept der Therapeutischen Landschaften. In U. Gebhard, & T. Kistemann (Hrsg.), Landschaft – Identität – Gesundheit. Zum Konzept der Therapeutischen Landschaften (S. 123-149). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K.M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21, 31-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, C. (2007). Restoration or risk? Exploring the place of the common place In: A. Williams (Hrsg.), Therapeutic Landscapes (S. 245-272). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, C., & Bingely, A. (2007). Restorative places or scary spaces? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults. Health & Place 13, 799-811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G.H. (1980). Habitat selection: General theory and applications to human behavior. In: J.S. Lockard (Hrsg.), The evolution of human social behavior (S. 49-63). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G.H. (1986). An ecological and evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics. In: E.C. Penning-Rowsell, & D. Lowenthal (Hrsg.), Landscape Meanings and Values (S. 3-22). London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G.H., und Heerwagen, J.H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In: J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, und J. Tooby (Hrsg.), The adapted mind. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (S. 555-579). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, R., Tassinary, L.G., Ulrich, R.S., Hebl, M.R., & Grossman-Alexander, M. (1998). The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunisation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18, 113-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scopelliti, M., & Giuliani, M.V. (2004). Choosing restorative environments across the lifespan: A matter of place experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 423-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, A.E. (2004). Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1979). Landscapes of fear. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R.S. (1977). Visual landscape preference: a model and application. Man Environment System 7, 279-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R.S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environments. In: I. Altman und J.F. Wohlwill (Hrsg.), Behaviour and the Natural Environment 6 (S. 85-125). New York, London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R.S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224(4647), 420-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11, 201-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N.M., & Evans, G.W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior 35, 311-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1984). Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1993). Biophilia and the Conservation Ethic. In: S.R. Kellert und E.O. Wilson (Hrsg.), The Biophilia hypothesis (S. 31-41). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill, J.F. (1983). The Concept of Nature: A Psychologist’s View. In: I. Altman und J.F. Wohlwill (Hrsg.), Behaviour and the Natural Environment 6 (S. 5-37). New York, London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Völker, S. (2016). Anthropologische Aspekte des Verhältnisses von Mensch und Natur(-landschaft). In: Gebhard, U., Kistemann, T. (eds) Landschaft, Identität und Gesundheit. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19723-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19723-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19722-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19723-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics