Abstract
Throughout its age-old tradition, philosophy has continuously been presented with new challenges. The latest one in this series comes from the experimental disciplines and their methodology: experimental philosophy has, during the last 10 to 15 years, increasingly gained reputation, and has certainly been a controversial issue. Within this movement, the field of ethics deserves more attention. This article aims to give not a complete overview of, but at least an introduction to the newly rising field of “Experimental Ethics”, the chances it offers, the problems for discussion and the criticism to be expected.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Similar criticisims have been raised against order ethics, cf. Luetge and Mukerji 2014.
References
Alicke, Mark & David Rose (2012). Culpable Control and Deviant Causal Chains. Personality and Social Psychology Compass 6 (10):723–735.
Andreoni, James (1988): "Why Free Ride? Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments", Journal of Public Economics 37, 291–304.
Appiah, Kwame A. (2008): Experiments in Ethics. Cambridge, Mass.: HUP.
Binmore, Kenneth (2010): "Social Norms or Social Preferences?", Mind and Society 9, 139–158.
Buckwalter, Wesley (2010). Knowledge Isn't Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3):395–406.
Campbell, Donald T. 1974. “Evolutionary Epistemology.” In: Schlipp, Paul A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper Vol. I, 413–459. Illinois: La Salle.
Dworazik, Niklas & Hannes Rusch (2014): A brief history of Experimental Ethics, in this volume.
Greene, Joshua D. (2012). Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment. Cognitive Science Churchland, Patricia (1989): Neurophilosophy – Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Bradford Book.
Feltz, Adam & Edward T. Cokely (2009). Do Judgments About Freedom and Responsibility Depend on Who You Are? Personality Differences in Intuitions About Compatibilism and Incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):342–350.
Gürerk, Özgür et al (2006): The Competitive Advantage of Sanctioning Institutions. Science 312, 108.
Huebner, Bryce; Michael Bruno & Hagop Sarkissian (2010). What Does the Nation of China Think About Phenomenal States? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):225–243.
Inbar, Yoel; David A. Pizarro, Joshua Knobe & Paul Bloom (2009). Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Intuitive Disapproval of Gays. Emotion 9 (3): 435–43.
Kahane, Guy (2013). The Armchair and the Trolley: An Argument for Experimental Ethics. Philosophical Studies 162 (2):421–445.
Kahneman, Daniel (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kitcher, Philip (1993). The Advancement of Science. Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knobe, Joshua (2003). "Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language". Analysis, 63, 190–193.
Knobe, Joshua (2005). Ordinary Ethical Reasoning and the Ideal of 'Being Yourself'. Philosophical Psychology 18 (3):327–340.
Knobe, Joshua (2007): “Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Significance”, Philosophical Explorations 10(2): 119–121.
Knobe, Joshua; Nichols, Shaun (eds.) (2008): Experimental Philosophy. New York: OUP.
Knobe, Joshua (2009). Folk Judgments of Causation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):238–242.
Levati, M. Vittoria, Uhl, Matthias and Zultan, Ro’i: "Imperfect Recall and Time Inconsistencies: An Experimental Test of the Absentminded Driver 'Paradox'". International Journal of Game Theory 43, 2014, 65–88.
Luetge, Christoph (2014): What Holds a Society Together? Order Ethics vs. Moral Surplus, Lanham, Md.: Lexington.
Luetge, Christoph, Nikil Mukerji (eds.) (2014): Order Ethics: An Ethical Framework for the Social Market Economy, Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Luetge, Christoph, Hannes Rusch (2013): The Systematic Place of Morals in Markets: Comment on Armin Falk & Nora Szech "Morals and Markets", Science 341 (6147), 16th August 2013, p. 714.
May, Joshua; Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Jay G. Hull & Aaron Zimmerman (2010). Practical Interests, Relevant Alternatives, and Knowledge Attributions: An Empirical Study. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):265–273.
Nichols, Shaun (2006). Folk Intuitions on Free Will. Journal of Cognition and Culture 6:57–86
Rusch, Hannes/Luetge, Christoph (forthcoming). Spillovers From Coordination to Cooperation: Positive Evidence for the Interdependence Hypothesis from the Lab, under review.
Russell, Bertrand (1952): The Problems of Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Schultz, Eric; Edward T. Cokely & Adam Feltz (2011). Persistent Bias in Expert Judgments About Free Will and Moral Responsibility: A Test of the Expertise Defense. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1722–1731.
Schwitzgebel, Eric (2009): “Do Ethicists Steal more Books?”, Philosophical Psychology 22: 711–725.
Schwitzgebel, Eric (2014): The moral behavior of ethicists and the role of the philosopher, in this volume.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter et al. (2014): Implicit moral attitudes, in this volume.
Weigel, Chris (2012). Experimental Evidence for Free Will Revisionism. Philosophical Explorations 16 (1):31–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Luetge, C. (2022). Chances, Problems and Limits of Experimental Ethics. In: Lütge, C., Thejls Ziegler, M. (eds) Evolving Business Ethics. Wirtschaftsethik in der globalisierten Welt. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05845-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05845-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart
Print ISBN: 978-3-476-05844-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-476-05845-4
eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)