Abstract
Wisdom has been a central theme in the philosophical inquiry of the human experience for centuries, with the earliest written teachings dating back to the ancient Egyptian vizier, Ptahhotep 25-24 century BCE. The virtue of wisdom has been attributed to the great deities of various cultures and mythologies (e.g., Anahit of Armenia, Athena of Greece), and a quality humankind is encouraged to embody millennia later. In more recent decades, psychological scientists have begun to study the concept of wisdom, exploring characteristics of a wise person as well as meta-cognitive processes and moral aspirations involved in wise decision-making. At the core of wisdom is the recognition and acceptance that for any given issue there are different possible perspectives, interests, contexts, and outcomes, as well as the willingness to consider and take into account these different possibilities when working through the issue. This chapter reviews the psychological study of wisdom, with a focus on the conceptual and empirical construct of wisdom as it relates to the possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, M. J. (1952). The great ideas: A syntopicon of great books of the western world (Vol. 2). Chicago: William Benton Publisher.
Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503025003004.
Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122.
Birren, J. E., & Svensson, C. M. (2005). Wisdom in history. In A handbook of wisdom: psychological perspectives (pp. 3–31). Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University.
Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Santos, H. C., Bobocel, D. R., & Grossmann, I. (2018). Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1093–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000171.
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and individual differences, 13(6), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I.
Dorfman, A., Moscovitch, D. A., & Grossmann, I. (2020). Pathways from adversity to wisdom. In F. J. Infurna & E. Jayawickreme (Eds.), Redesigning research on post-traumatic growth: Challenges, pitfalls and new directions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Durant, W. (1961). Story of philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster. (Original work published in 1926).
Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). A sociocultural theory of creativity: Bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 335–354.
Grossmann, I. (2017). Wisdom in context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616672066.
Grossmann, I. (2020). The science of wisdom. AEON. https://aeon.co/essays/how-psychological-scientists-found-the-empirical-path-to-wisdom
Grossmann, I., & Brienza, J. P. (2018). The strengths of wisdom provide unique contributions to improved leadership, sustainability, inequality, gross national happiness, and civic discourse in the face of contemporary world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 6(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6020022.
Grossmann, I., & Dorfman, A. (2019). Wise reasoning in an uncertain world. In Applying wisdom to contemporary world problems (pp. 51–79). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20287-3_3.
Grossmann, I., & Kross, E. (2014). Exploring Solomon’s paradox: Self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relationships in younger and older adults. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535400.
Grossmann, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E. W., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2013). A route to well-being: Intelligence versus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 944–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029560.
Grossmann, I., Gerlach, T. M., & Denissen, J. J. (2016). Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616652206.
Grossmann, I., Brienza, J. P., & Bobocel, D. R. (2017). Wise deliberation sustains cooperation. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0061.
Grossmann, I., Kung, F. Y. H., & Santos, H. C. (2019a). Wisdom as state versus trait. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Glück (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 249–273). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.013.
Grossmann, I., Oakes, H., & Santos, H. C. (2019b). Wise reasoning benefits from emodiversity, irrespective of emotional intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(5), 805–823. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000543.
Grossmann, I., Dorfman, A., & Oakes, H. (2020a). Wisdom is a social-ecological rather than person-centric phenomenon. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.010.
Grossmann, I., Weststrate, N. M., Ardelt, M., Brienza, J. P., Dong, M., Ferrari, M., Fournier, M. A., Hu, C. S., Nusbaum, H. C., & Vervaeke, J. (2020b). Wisdom science in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917.
Grossmann, I., Dorfman, A., Oakes, H., Santos, H. C., Vohs, K. D., & Scholer, A. A. (in press). Training for wisdom: The distanced self-reflection diary method. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a5fgu.
Huynh, A. C., Yang, D. Y. J., & Grossmann, I. (2016). The value of prospective reasoning for close relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616660591.
Huynh, A. C., Oakes, H., Shay, G. R., & McGregor, I. (2017). The wisdom in virtue: Pursuit of virtue predicts wise reasoning about personal conflicts. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1848–1856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617722621.
Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. (2011). Making meaning out of negative experiences by self-distancing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411408883.
Kross, E., & Grossmann, I. (2012). Boosting wisdom: Distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024158.
Kung, F. Y. H., & Grossmann, I. (2020). Wisdom across cultures. In O. Braddick (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.586.
Kunzmann, U., & Baltes, P. B. (2003). Beyond the traditional scope of intelligence: Wisdom in action. In R. J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T. I. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (p. 329–343). American Psychological Association.
Levenson, M. R., Jennings, P. A., Aldwin, C. M., & Shiraishi, R. W. (2005). Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.2190/XRXM-FYRA-7U0X-GRC0.
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3–31). New York: Basic Books.
Mickler, C., & Staudinger, U. M. (2008). Personal wisdom: Validation and age-related differences of a performance measure. Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 787–799.
Murdock, K. W., Oddi, K. B., & Bridgett, D. J. (2013). Cognitive correlates of personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 34, 97–10. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000104.
Robson, D. (2019). Why speaking to yourself in the third person makes you wiser. AEON. https://aeon.co/ideas/why-speaking-to-yourself-in-the-third-person-makes-you-wiser
Staudinger, U. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1996). Interactive minds: A facilitative setting for wisdom-related performance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 746–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.746.
Staudinger, U. M., Lopez, D. F., & Baltes, P. B. (1997). The psychometric location of wisdom-related performance: Intelligence, personality, and more? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(11), 1200–1214. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672972311007.
Staudinger, U. M., Maciel, A. G., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). What predicts wisdom‐related performance? A first look at personality, intelligence, and facilitative experiential contexts. European Journal of Personality, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199801/02)12:1<1::AID-PER285>3.0.CO;2-9.
Staudinger, U. M., & Glück, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131659.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627.
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347.
Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.65.2.d.
Webster, J. D., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2014). Wisdom and Mental Health Across the Lifespan. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs121.
Yang, S. Y. (2014). Wisdom and learning from important and meaningful life experiences. Journal of Adult Development, 21(3), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-014-9186-x.
Zacher, H., McKenna, B., & Rooney, D. (2013). Effects of self-reported wisdom on happiness: Not much more than emotional intelligence? Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(6), 1697–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9404-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kara-Yakoubian, M., Rotella, A., Dorfman, A., Grossmann, I. (2021). Wisdom. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_169-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_169-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences