Skip to main content

From Mercenaries to Private Patriots: Nationalism and the Private Military Contractors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sociology of Privatized Security

Abstract

The private military and security contractors (PMSCs) are often described as the profit-seeking mercenaries. More specifically the commentators usually make no distinction between the traditional ‘soldiers of fortune’ such as corsairs, pirates, privateers, mercenaries or marauders and the twenty-first-century contractors. However, in this chapter I aim to challenge such simplified historical analogies by focusing on the different ideological and organisational dynamics of PMSCs and their pre-modern mercenary counterparts. I aim to show that unlike mercenaries who had no sense of loyalty to any nation, the employees of PMSCs were born and raised in the nation-centric environments and as such are inevitably ideologically and organisationally wedded to the nationalist realities of modern life. The chapter explores how private military contractors manage and negotiate the organisational aims of profit maximisation with the often-conflicting ideological goals set by national governments and the wider public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In some cases PMSCs were led by individuals who either acted in unison with their nation’s secret services or pursued their own nationalist and profit-making ambitions. For example, Frenchman Bob Denard whose private forces fought in Congo, Angola, Gabon and Zimbabwe was a fierce French nationalist who was eager to support the ideal of Françafrique—France’s sphere of influence in its former African colonies and who worked closely with the French intelligence. Other well-known 1960s private contractors such as former British officer Mike Hoare and Belgian Jean Schramme were also staunch nationalists (Weinberg 1995).

  2. 2.

    According to Singer (2008: 103), 70% of Executive Outcomes were black Africans including Namibians, Angolans and South Africans who previously fought alongside SADF in the border wars.

  3. 3.

    According to the Protocol Additional GC 1977 (APGC77) of Geneva convention, mercenaries do not possess the rights associated with the regular soldiers such as to be lawful combatant, or to have a status of prisoner of war meaning that if captured they are likely to be treated as common criminals.

  4. 4.

    Although Singer differentiates sharply between contemporary national militaries and PMSCs, the evidence points that these two models of coercive organisation have great deal in common.

  5. 5.

    Although ancient Chinese sources often refer to millions of soldiers, most contemporary historians agree that these are inflated and exaggerated numbers. (see Malešević 2017; Mann 1986).

  6. 6.

    After this period China experienced population decline until 1193 when during Southern Song Dynasty, the population grew to 76.81 million (Chang-Qun et al. 1998).

  7. 7.

    For example, the personnel of the large PMSCs such as MPRI consists of 95% of former US Army members (Singer 2008: 120).

Works Cited

  • Barkawi, T. 2010. State and Armed Force in International Context. In Mercenaries, Pirates, Bandits and Empires: Private Violence in Historical Context, ed. A. Colas and B. Mabee. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuilly, J. 1992. Nationalism and the State. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk, J. 1989. National Attachments and the Decline of the Mass Armed Force. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 17: 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang-Qun, D., G. Xue-Chun, J. Wang, and P.K. Chien. 1998. Relocation of Civilization Centers in Ancient China: Environmental Factors. Ambio 27 (7): 572–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conversi, D. 2007. Homogenisation, Nationalism and War: Should We Still Read Ernest Gellner? Nations and Nationalism 13 (3): 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato, R. 2010. The Varangian Guard 988–1453. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, L. A. 2011. Privatization and Accountability. In Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 7, ed. J. Hagan, K. L. Scheppele, and T. R. Tyler. ABE BOOKS: Victoria, British Columbia.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. 2000. The Civilising Process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, J. 1995. The Looking-Glass Army: Patriotism in the Post-Cold War Era. Armed Forces & Society 21: 411–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, N. 2009. The Roman Army of the Principate 27 BC–AD 117. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, V., and M. von Boemcken. 2011. Guns for Hire: Motivations and Attitudes of Private Security Contractors. Armed Forces and Society 37 (4): 725–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. The Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, A. 1998. Inside Lt Col Spicer’s New Model Army. The Guardian 1276, November 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, D.A. 2016. The Eurasian Way of War Military Practice in Seventh-Century China and Byzantium. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, A. 2015. The Invisible Soldiers: How America Outsourced Our Security. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A. 1985. Powers and Liberties: The Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. States and Societies: The Miracle in Comparative Perspective. In Europe and the Rise of Capitalism, ed. J. Baechler, J.A. Hall, and M. Mann. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinecken, L. 2013. Outsourcing Public Security: The Unforeseen Consequences for the Military Profession. Armed Forces & Society 40 (4): 625–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. 2017. Nationalism and War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. 1971. The Professional Soldier. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, C. 2009. Private Contractors and the Reconstruction of Iraq: Transforming Military Logistics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, R. 2013. Mercenary, Citizen, Victim: The Rise and Fall of Conscription in the West. In Nationalism and War, ed. John A. Hall and S. Malešević. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Why Privatize: The Reasons to Buy, Rent, or Create Private Militaries form Feudal Europe to the Era of American Decline (Chapter in this book).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leira, H., and B. de Carvalho. 2010. Privateers of the North Sea: At World’s End French Privateers in Norwegian Waters. In Mercenaries, Pirates, Bandits and Empires: Private Violence in Historical Context, ed. A. Colas and B. Mabee. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malešević, S. 2006. Identity as Ideology: Understanding Ethnicity and Nationalism. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The Sociology of War and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Nation-States and Nationalisms: Organisation, Ideology and Solidarity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The Rise of Organised Brutality: A Historical Sociology of Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, M. 1974. Mercenaries and Their Masters: Warfare in Renaissance Italy. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. 1986. The Sources of Social Power, Vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The Sources of Social Power, Vol 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Sources of Social Power Revisited: A Response to Crtiticism. In An Anatomy of Power: The Social Theory of Michael Mann, ed. J.A. Hall and R. Schroder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFate, S. 2017. The Modern Mercenary: Private Armies and What They Mean for World Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medrano, J.D. 2009. Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain and United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskos, C.C. 1981. Institution Versus Occupation: Contrasting Models of Military Organization. Washington, DC: Wilson Center, International Security Studies Program.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, J. 2014. The Morality of Private War: The Challenge of Private Military and Security Companies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Posen, B. 1993. Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power. International Security 18 (2): 80–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scahill, J. 2007. A Very Private War. Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/aug/01/military.usa.

  • Singer, P.W. 2008. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T., and S. Kim. 2006. National Pride in Cross-National and Temporal Perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18 (1): 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swed, O., and T. Crosbie. 2017. Private Military and Security Contractors: A Troubling Oversight. Sociology Compass 11 (11): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, R. 2002. Philip the Good. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1968. Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S. 1995. Last of the Pirates: In Search of Bob Denard. London: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siniša Malešević .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malešević, S. (2019). From Mercenaries to Private Patriots: Nationalism and the Private Military Contractors. In: Swed, O., Crosbie, T. (eds) The Sociology of Privatized Security. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98222-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98222-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98221-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98222-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics