Abstract
Several criminological and psychological theories and their empirical support for explaining cybercrime are reviewed. Social learning theory, self-control theory, and subcultural theories have garnered much empirical attention and support. Lack of moral qualms, association with deviant peers and neutralizations have consistently been associated with a wide range of cyber-offending. From routine activities theory, increased visibility is associated with higher cyber-victimization and cyber-offending across many offenses. Integrating social learning and self-control concepts, research has found that effects of low self-control on cybercrime are mediated through association with deviant peers and beliefs that the behaviors are not morally wrong. Research in the tradition of subcultural theories have discovered the norms underlying memberships in deviant groups of persistent digital pirates, hackers, and regular participants in the online illicit sex trade. Limited research has examined deterrence theory, general strain theory, or differential reinforcements in social learning theory. Future research is needed to integrate the perceived characteristics of cyberspace with the formation of attitudes and beliefs supportive of perpetration of cybercrimes, and to address the dearth of knowledge about the nature of social interactions in cyberspace and how such interactions shape real world interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.
Agnew, R. (2006). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further researches. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 121–123). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Akers, R. L., Sellers, C. S., & Jennings, W. G. (2016). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence and the moral life of the Inner City. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Bachmann, M. (2007). Lesson spurned? Reactions of online music pirates to legal prosecutions by the RIAA. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 1(2), 213–227.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.
Barlett, C. P., & Fennel, M. (2016). Examining the relation between parental ignorance and youths’ cyberbullying perpetration. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(1), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.009.
Barlett, C. P., & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(2), 123–135.
Barlett, C. P., & Helmstetter, K. M. (2017). Longitudinal relations between early online disinhibition and anonymity perceptions on later cyberbullying perpetration: A theoretical test on youth. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000149.
Barlett, C. P., Chamberlin, K., & Witkower, Z. (2017). Predicting cyberbullying perpetration in emerging adults: A theoretical test of the Barlette Gentile Cyberbullying Model. Aggressive Behavior, 43, 147–154.
Barlett, C. P., Gentile, D. A., & Chew, C. (2016). Predicting cyberbullying from anonymity. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000055.
Bayraktar, F., Machackova, H., Dedkova, L., Cerna, A., & Sevcikova, A. (2015). Cyberbullying: The discriminant factors among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyberbully-victims in a Czech adolescent sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(18), 3192–3216. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626051455006.
Beaver, K. M., & Wright, J. P. (2007). The stability of low self-control from kindergarten through first grade. Journal of Crime and Justice, 30(1), 63–86.
Beccaria, C. (1764). On crimes and punishment (H. Paolucci, Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Bossler, A. M., & Burruss, G. W. (2011). The general theory of crime and computer hacking: Low self-control hackers. In T. J. Holt & B. H. Schell (Eds.), Corporate hacking and technology-driven crime (pp. 38–67). Hershey: IGI Global.
Bossler, A. M., & Holt, T. J. (2009). On-line activities, guardianship, and malware infection: An examination of routine activities theory. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(1), 400–420. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986213507401.
Bossler, A. M., Holt, T. J., & May, D. C. (2012). Predicting online harassment victimization among a juvenile population. Youth Society, 44(4), 500–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11407525.
Brenner, S. W. (2012). Cybercrime and the law: Challenges, issues and outcomes. Lebanon: Northeastern University Press.
Burruss, G. W., Bossler, A. M., & Holt, T. J. (2012). Assessing the mediation of a fuller social learning model on low self-control’s influence on software piracy. Crime & Delinquency, 59(8), 1157–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712437915.
Chen, L., Ho, S. S., & Lwin, M. O. (2017). A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1194–1213.
Choi, K. S. (2008). Computer crime victimization and integrated theory: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2(1), 308.
Cohen, A. K., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rates: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 214–241.
DeLisi, M., & Piquero, A. R. (2011). New frontiers in criminal careers research, 2000–2011: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.05.001.
Donner, C. M., Marcum, C. D., Jennings, W. G., Higgins, G. E., & Banfield, J. (2014). Low self-control and cybercrime: Exploring the utility of the general theory of crime beyond digital piracy. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.040.
Felson, M. (1998). Crime & everyday life (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier.
Giordano, P. C., Johnson, W. L., Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Minter, M. D. (2015). Intimate partner violence in young adulthood: Narratives of persistence and desistance. Criminology, 53(3), 330–365.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Grabosky, P. M. (2001). Virtual criminality: Old wine in new bottles? Social & Legal Studies, 10(2), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/a017405.
Grabosky, P. N., & Smith, R. G. (2001). Digital crime in the twenty-first century. Journal of Information Ethics, 10(1), 8–26.
Gunter, W. D. (2008). Piracy on the high speeds: A test of social learning theory on digital piracy among college students. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 3(1), 54–68.
Harris, L. C., & Dumas, A. (2009). Online consumer misbehavior: An application of naturalization theory. Marketing Theory, 9(4), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593109346895.
Henson, B., Swartz, K., & Reyns, B. W. (2017). #Respect: Applying Anderson’s code of the street to the online context. Deviant Behavior, 38(7), 768–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1197682.
Higgins, G. E. (2005). Can low self-control help understand the software piracy problem? Deviant Behavior, 26, 1–24.
Higgins, G. E., & Makin, D. A. (2004). Does social learning theory condition the effects of low self-control on college students’ software piracy? Journal of Economic Crime Management, 2(2), 1–30.
Higgins, G. E., & Marcum, C. D. (2011). Digital piracy: An integrated theoretical approach. Raleigh: Carolina Academic Press.
Higgins, G. E., Fell, B. D., & Wilson, A. L. (2006). Digital piracy: Assessing the contributions of an integrated self-control theory and social learning theory using structural equation modeling. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 3–22.
Higgins, G. E., Fell, B. D., & Wilson, A. L. (2007). Low self-control and social learning in understanding students’ intentions to pirate movies in the United States. Social Science Computer Review, 25(3), 339–357.
Higgins, G. E., Wolfe, S. E., & Marcum, C. D. (2015). Music piracy and neutralization: A preliminary trajectory analysis from short-term longitudinal data. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2(2), 324–336.
Hinduja, S. (2008). Deindividuation and internet software piracy. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0048.
Hinduja, S., & Ingram, J. R. (2009). Social learning theory and music piracy: The differential role of online and offline peer influences. Criminal Justice Studies, 22(4), 405–420.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29, 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816.
Hirschi, T. (2004). Self-control and crime. In R. Baumeister & K. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 537–552). New York: Guilford Press.
Hollinger, R. C., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1988). The process of criminalization: The case of computer crime laws. Criminology, 26(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9124.1988.tb00834.x.
Holt, T. J. (2007). Subcultural evolution? Examining the influence of on- and off-line experiences on deviant subcultures. Deviant Behavior, 28, 171–198.
Holt, T. J., & Bossler, A. M. (2008). Examining the applicability of lifestyle-routine activities theory of cybercrime victimization. Deviant Behavior, 30(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701876577.
Holt, T. J., & Bossler, A. M. (2013). Examining the relationship between routine activities and malware infection indicators. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29(4), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986213507401.
Holt, T. J., & Bossler, A. M. (2014). An assessment of the current state of cybercrime scholarship. Deviant Behavior, 35(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.822209.
Holt, T. J., & Copes, H. (2010). Transferring subcultural knowledge on-line: Practices and beliefs of digital pirates. Deviant Behavior, 31(7), 625–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620903231548.
Holt, T. J., & Turner, M. G. (2012). Examining risks and protective factors of on line identity theft. Deviant Behavior, 33, 308–323.
Holt, T. J., Bossler, A. M., & May, D. C. (2012). Low self-control, deviant peer associations, and juvenile cyberdeviance. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(3), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9117-3.
Holt, T. J., Freilich, J. D., & Chermak, S. M. (2017). Exploring the subculture of ideologically motivated cyber-attackers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(3), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986217699100.
Irdeto (2017). Infographic: When it comes to piracy – The world needs a tutor. Downloaded on March 3, 2018 from: https://irdeto.com/index.html.
Jang, H., Song, J., & Kim, R. (2014). Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory. Concepts in Human Behavior, 31, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.007.
Kigerl, A. C. (2009). CAN SPAM act: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(2), 566–589.
Kigerl, A. C. (2015). Evaluation of the CAN SPAM act: Testing deterrence and other influences of e-mail spammer legal compliance over time. Social Science Computer Review, 33(4), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314553913.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137.
Kranenbarg, M. W., Holt, T. J., & van Gelder, J. (2017). Offending and victimization in the digital age: Comparing correlates of cybercrime and traditional offending-only, victimization-only, and the victimization-offending overlap. Deviant Behavior, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1411030.
Leukfeldt, E. R., & Yar, M. (2016). Applying routine activities theory to cybercrime: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Deviant Behavior, 37(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1012409.
Li, C. K. W., Holt, T. J., Bossler, A. M., & May, D. C. (2016). Examining the mediating effects of social learning on the low self-control- cyberbullying relationship in a youth sample. Deviant Behavior, 37(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.1004023.
Lowry, P. B., Zhang, J., Wang, C., & Siponen, M. (2016). Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online distribution and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 962–986.
Maimon, D., Alper, M., Sobesto, B., & Cukier, M. (2014). Restrictive deterrent effects of a warning banner in an attacked computer system. Criminology, 52(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12028.
Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., Wolfe, S. E., & Ricketts, M. L. (2011). Examining the intersection of self-control, peer association and neutralization in explaining digital piracy. Western Criminology Review, 12(3), 60–74 Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228458057_Examining_the_Intersection_of_Self-control_Peer_Association_and_Neutralization_in_Explaining_Digital_Piracy.
Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., Ricketts, M. L., & Wolfe, S. E. (2014). Hacking in high school: Cybercrime perpetration by juveniles. Deviant Behavior, 35(7), 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.867721.
McQuade, S. C. (2006). Understanding and managing cybercrime. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). The stability and resiliency of self-control in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 52(3), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705280586.
Moon, B., McCluskey, J. D., & Perez McCluskey, C. (2010). A general theory of crime and computer crime: An empirical test. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 767–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.003.
Moore, R., & McMullan, E. C. (2009). Neutralizations and rationalizations of digital piracy: A qualitative analysis of university students. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(1), 441–451 Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229020027_Neutralizations_and_rationalizations_of_digital_piracy_A_qualitative_analysis_ of_university_students.
Morris, R. G. (2010). Computer hacking and the techniques of neutralization: An empirical assessment. In T. J. Holt & B. Schell (Eds.), Corporate hacking and technology-driven crime: Social dynamics and implications (pp. 1–17). New York: Information Science Reference.
Morris, R. G., & Higgins, G. E. (2009). Neutralizing potential and self-reported digital piracy: A multitheoretical exploration among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice Review, 34(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016808325034.
Morris, R. G., Johnson, M. C., & Higgins, G. E. (2009). The role of gender in predicting the willingness to engage in digital piracy among college students. Criminal Justice Studies, 22(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010903358117.
Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (1999). A routine activities theory explanation for women’s stalking victimizations. Violence Against Women, 5(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778019922181149.
Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century: A review of the evidence. Carnegie Mellon University Research Showcase. Downloaded on April 4th, 2018 from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c788/48cc41cdc319033079c69c7cf1d3e80498b4.pdf.
Ngo, F. T., & Paternoster, R. (2011). Cybercrime victimization: An examination of individual and situational level factors. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 5(1), 773–793.
O’Neill, M. E. (2000). Old crimes in new bottles: Sanctioning cybercrime. George Mason Law Review, 9, 237.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth Society, 43, 727–751.
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00911.x.
Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Blevins, K. R., Daigle, L. E., & Madensen, T. D. (2008). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 367–396). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Pratt, T. C., Holtfreter, K., & Reisig, M. D. (2010). Routine online activity and internet fraud targeting: Extending the generality of routine activity theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 267–296.
Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564.
Reyns, B. W. (2013). Online routines and identity theft victimization: Further expanding routine activities theory beyond direct-contact offenses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(2), 216–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427811425539.
Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (1997). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Boulder: Westview Press.
Seto, M. C. (2013). Internet sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford: Appleton-Century.
Skinner, W. F., & Fream, A. M. (1997). A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college students. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(4), 495–518.
Stalans, L. J., & Finn, M. A. (2016a). Defining and predicting pimps’ coerciveness toward sex workers: Socialization processes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516675919.
Stalans, L. J., & Finn, M. A. (2016b). Consulting legal experts in the real and virtual world: Pimps’ and johns’ cultural schemas about strategies to avoid arrest and conviction. Deviant Behavior, 37(6), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1060810.
Stalans, L. J., & Finn, M. A. (2016c). Introduction to special issue: How the internet facilitates deviance. Victims and Offenders, 11(4), 578–599.
Stewart, E. A., & Simons, R. L. (2010). Race, code of the street, and violent delinquency: A multilevel investigation of neighborhood street culture and individual norms of violence. Criminology, 48(2), 569–605.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.
Van Wilsem, J. (2013). Hacking and harassment- Do they have something in common? Comparing risk factors for online victimization. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29(4), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986213507042.
Vazsonyi, A. T., Machackova, H., Sevcikova, A., Smahel, D., & Cerna, A. (2012). The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.644919.
Vazsonyi, A. T., Mikuska, J., & Kelley, E. L. (2017). It’s time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.10.001.
Wall, D. S. (1998). Catching cybercriminals: Policing the Internet. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 12(2), 201–218.
Wilson, T., Maimon, D., Sobesto, B., & Cukier, M. (2015). The effect of a surveillance banner in an attacked computer system: Additional evidence for the relevance of restrictive deterrence in cyberspace. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(6), 829–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815587761.
Wong-Lo, M., & Bullock, L. M. (2014). Digital metamorphosis: Examination of the bystander culture in cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 418–422.
Yar, M. (2005). The novelty of ‘cybercrime’: An assessment in light of routine activity theory. European Journal of Criminology, 2(4), 407–427.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stalans, L.J., Donner, C.M. (2018). Explaining Why Cybercrime Occurs: Criminological and Psychological Theories. In: Jahankhani, H. (eds) Cyber Criminology. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97181-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97181-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97180-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97181-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)