Skip to main content

Indexicality in the Age of the Sensor and Metadata

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Distance in Documentary Media

Abstract

The concept of indexicality has remained fundamental to documentary, helping to distinguish the genre from other audio-visual forms and providing the sense of urgency it generates as a social-political form. This chapter considers the nature and implications of indexicality at a time when video capturing capabilities have become increasingly ubiquitous, and embedded in mobile, locative, and networked devices where image and sound recording operate together with an array of other sensors. The generation of video together with metadata involves the generation of additional layers of information which carry meaning above and beyond that seen within the frame. At one level, metadata help to augment the “sense-making” capability of documentary makers, increasing the means to scale up workflows around the collation, organization, and sifting of material. At another level, it is important to recognize that metadata can take on different meanings within the automated systems which assess, categorize, and perform operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Anderson, Chris. 2008. “The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete.” Wired Magazine 16 (7): 16–07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, Mark, and Mark Burdon. 2015. “Defining the Sensor Society.” Television & New Media 16 (1): 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aston, Judith, Sandra Gaudenzi, and Mandy Rose (eds.). 2017. i-Docs: The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, David. 2011. The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bibart, James E. 2016. “Metadata in Digital Photography: The Need for Protection and Production of This Silent Witness.” Capital University Law Review 44 (4): 789–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Danah, and Kate Crawford. 2011. “Six Provocations for Big Data.” In A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, vol. 21. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, John. 1996. The Art of Record: A Critical Introduction to Documentary. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Kate. 2013. “The Hidden Biases in Big Data.” HBR Blog Network 1. https://hbr.org/2013/04/the-hidden-biases-in-big-data.

  • Cruz, Edgar Gómez. 2016. “14 Photo-genic Assemblages.” In Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, edited by Edgar Gómez Cruz and Asko Lehmuskallio, 228–242. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, Edgar Gómez, and Asko Lehmuskallio (eds.). 2016. Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DatNav: How to Navigate Digital Data for Human Rights Research (June 2016), The Engine Room, Amnesty International. https://www.theengineroom.org/datnav-digital-data-in-human-rights-research/.

  • Dovey, Jon. 2014. “Documentary Ecosystems: Collaboration and Exploitation.” In New Documentary Ecologies: Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses, edited by Kate Nash, Craig Hight, and Catherine Summerhayes, 11–32. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, Jon, and Mandy Rose. 2012. “We’re Happy and We Know It: Documentary, Data, Montage.” Studies in Documentary Film 6 (2): 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, Jon, and Mandy Rose. 2013. “‘This Great Mapping of Ourselves’—New Documentary Forms Online.” In BFI Companion to Documentary, edited by Brian Winston, 366–375. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Matthew. 2003. Behind the Blip: Essays on the Culture of Software. New York: Autonomedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Matthew (ed.). 2008. Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder, Scott A., and Michael W. Macy. 2014. “Digital Footprints: Opportunities and Challenges for Online Social Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 40: 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Sam, and Elizabeth Losh. 2012. “Remixing Human Rights: Rethinking Civic Expression, Representation and Personal Security in Online Video.” First Monday 17 (8). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4104/3279.

  • Gye, Lisa. 2007. “Picture This: The Impact of Mobile Camera Phones on Personal Photographic Practices.” Continuum. 21 (2): 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, Martin. 2012. Ubiquitous Photography. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermida, Alfred. 2014. “Filtering Fact from Fiction.” In Ethics for Digital Journalists: Emerging Best Practices, edited by Lawrie Zion and David Craig, 59–73. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hight, Craig. 2008. “The Field of Digital Documentary: A Challenge to Documentary Theorists.” Studies in Documentary Film 2 (1): 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hight, Craig. 2014. “Automation Within Digital Videography: From the Ken Burns Effect to ‘Meaning-Making’ Engines.” Studies in Documentary Film 8 (3): 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hight, Craig. 2017a. “The Challenges of Using YouTube as a Data Resource.” In Studying Digital Media Audiences: Perspectives from Australasia, edited by Craig Hight and Ramaswami Harindranath, 98–115. Oxford: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hight, Craig. 2017b. “Software as Co-creator in Interactive Documentary.” In i-Docs: The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary, edited by Judith Aston, Sandra Gaudenzi, and Mandy Rose, 82–96. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, Larissa, and Sarah Pink. 2014. “New Visualities and the Digital Wayfarer: Reconceptualizing Camera Phone Photography and Locative Media.” Mobile Media & Communication 2 (1): 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzl, Ingrid, and Rémi Marie. 2015. Softimage: Towards a New Theory of the Digital Image. Bristol: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Reese V. 1975. “Technology and the Market: George Eastman and the Origins of Mass Amateur Photography.” Technology and Culture 16 (1): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Steven. 1997. Interface Culture—How New Technology Changes the Way We Create and Communicate. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, Elaine, Craig Hight, Rob Torrens, and Bronwen Cowie. 2017. “A Genealogy of Software Applications.” In Software Literacy, 15–29. Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, Rob. 2014. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, Rob, and Martin Dodge. 2011. Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmuskallio, Asko. 2016. “The Camera as a Sensor.” In Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, edited by Edgar Gómez Cruz and Asko Lehmuskallio, 243–266. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzner, Ben, and Craig Hight. 2017. “The Challenges of Human Rights Video Making in the Global Network: The Case of WITNESS.” http://wi.mobilities.ca/the-challenges-of-human-rights-video-making-in-the-global-network-the-case-of-witness/.

  • Lister, Martin. 2013. The Photographic Image in Digital Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, Mark. 2011. The Human Algorithm, May 20. https://storyful.com/blog/2011/05/20/the-human-algorithm-2/.

  • Mackenzie, Adrian. 2006. Cutting Code: Software and Sociality. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Männistö, Anssi. 2016. “The Boston Marathon Bombing Investigation as an Example of Networked Journalism and the Power of Big Data Analytics.” In Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, edited by Edgar Gómez Cruz and Asko Lehmuskallio, 86–97. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrenere, Joanna, and Wayne Ho. 2000. “Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concept.” In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000, 179–186, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, Tara. 2013. “Some Theses on the Future of Humanities Publishing.” In Future Publishing: Visual Culture in the Age of Possibility, edited by K Behar et al. London: International Association for Visual Culture, March. http://iavc.org.uk/2013/future-publishing-visual-culture-in-the-age-of-possibility.

  • Mitchell, William J. 1992. The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Photographic Era. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munir, Kamal A., and Nelson Phillips. 2005. “The Birth of the ‘Kodak Moment’: Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies.” Organization Studies 26 (11): 1665–1687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Susan. 2008. “Digital Images, Photo-Sharing, and Our Shifting Notions of Everyday Aesthetics.” Journal of Visual Culture 7 (2): 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Kate, Craig Hight, and Catherine Summerhayes, eds. 2014. New Documentary Ecologies: Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Bill. 1991. Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Bill. 2017. Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, Sarah. 2016. “Photographic Places and Digital Wayfaring.” In Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, edited by Edgar Gómez Cruz and Asko Lehmuskallio, 186–190. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, Sarah, and Vaike Fors. 2017. “Self-Tracking and Mobile Media: New Digital Materialities.” Mobile Media & Communication. 5 (3): 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, Jeffrey. 2015. Metadata. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renov, Michael. 2004. The Subject of Documentary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Daniel, and Katrina Sluis. 2008. “A Life More Photographic: Mapping the Networked Image.” Photographies 1 (1): 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Daniel, and Katrina Sluis. 2013a. “Concerning the Undecidability of the Digital Image.” Photographies 6 (1): 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Daniel, and Katrina Sluis. 2013b. “The Digital Image in Photographic Culture.” In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, edited by Martin Lister, 22–40. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Marquard. 2013. “Theses on the Philosophy of History: The Work of Research in the Age of Digital Searchability and Distributability.” Journal of Visual Culture 12 (3): 375–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, Vivian. 2004. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen-Johnsen, Kari, and Bernard Enjolras. 2015. “Social Research and Big Data—The Tension Between Opportunities and Realities.” In Internet Research Ethics, edited by Hallvard Fossheim and Helene Ingierd, 122–140. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, José. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data Between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society 12 (2): 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Brian. 2008. Claiming the Real II: Documentary: Grierson and Beyond. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig Hight .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hight, C. (2018). Indexicality in the Age of the Sensor and Metadata. In: Cammaer, G., Fitzpatrick, B., Lessard, B. (eds) Critical Distance in Documentary Media. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96767-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics