Skip to main content

The Effects of the Political Parties’ Selective Bias on Descriptive Representation: Analysis of the Candidates’ Sociological and Political Background

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Candidates, Parties and Voters in the Belgian Partitocracy

Abstract

This chapter investigates which socio-political backgrounds determine the selection of Belgian candidates. We show that even though political parties recruit candidates that—imperfectly—mirror some of the broader social and political features of the voters, selective bias are unquestionable for strategic positions (i.e. winnable seats on the list). For the latter positions, Belgian political parties quasi exclusively recruit aspirants with the highest human, social and political capital. Given the importance of these positions in the Belgian flexible list electoral system, we underline the responsibility of political parties for the ‘unrepresentative’ traits of regional and federal parliaments at the very early stage of the candidate selection processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, Michael M., and David C. Docherty. 1992. “Moving Right Along: The Roots of Amateurism in the Canadian House of Commons.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique. Canadian Political Science Association and the Société québécoise de science politique 25 (2): 295–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, Heinrich. 2007. “New Challenges, New Elites? Changes in the Recruitment and Career Patterns of European Representative Elites.” Comparative Sociology 6 (1): 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, Heinrich, and Maurizio Cotta, eds. 2000. Parliamentary Representatives in Europe, 1848–2000: Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, Heinrich, and Lars Vogel. 2014. “The Sociology of Legislators and Legislatures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, edited by Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare Strøm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochel, John, and David Denver. 1983. “Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors Seek.” British Journal of Political Science 13 (1): 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchert, Jens. 2003. “Professional Politicians: Towards a Comparative Perspective.” In The Political Class in Advanced Democracies, edited by Jens Borchert and Jürgen Zeiss. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchert, Jens. 2011. “Individual Ambition and Institutional Opportunity: A Conceptual Approach to Political Careers in Multi-Level Systems.” Regional & Federal Studies 21 (2): 117–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchert, Jens, and Jürgen Zeiss, eds. 2003. The Political Class in Advanced Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouhon, Frédéric, Jérémy Dodeigne, and Audrey Vandeleene. 2018. “La confection des listes de candidats: règles juridiques et pratiques politiques.” In Les systèmes électoraux de la Belgique. 2nd ed., edited by Frédéric Bouhon and Min Reuchamps, 193–214. Brussels: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Reproduction: In Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnes, Nicholas. 2012. “Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 37 (1): 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celis, Karen, Mona Lena Krook, and Petra Meier. 2011. “The Rise of Gender Quota Laws: Expanding the Spectrum of Determinants for Electoral Reform.” West European Politics 34 (3): 514–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, Maurizo, and Heinrich Best, eds. 2007. Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, Maurizo, and Lucas Verzichelli. 2007. “Paths of Institutional Development and Elite Transformations.” In Democratic Representation in Europe Diversity, Change, and Convergence, edited by Maurizo Cotta and Heinrich Best. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, Maurizo, and Pedro Tavares de Almeida. 2007. “From Servants of the State to Elected Representatives: Public Sector Background Among Members of Parliament.” In Democratic Representation in Europe Diversity, Change, and Convergence, edited by Maurizo Cotta and Heinrich Best, 51–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, Drude. 2007. “Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result.” Representation 43 (2): 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devos, Carl, Herwig Reynaert, Tony Valcke, and Hilde Van Liefferinge. 2012. “Le visage de l’État: un portrait des élus depuis 1945.” In Les systèmes électoraux de la Belgique, edited by Frédéric Bouhon and Min Reuchamps, 459–479. Bruxelles: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winter, Lieven. 1988. “Belgium: Democracy or Oligarchy?” In Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective, edited by Michael Gallagher and Michael Marsh, 20–46. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winter, Lieven, and Marleen Brans. 2003. “Belgium: Political Professionals and the Crisis of the Party State.” In The Political Class in Advanced Democracies, edited by Jens Borchert and Jürgen Zeiss, 45–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodeigne, Jérémy. 2017. “Regional Ambition in Multilevel Democracies. A Comparative Case Study of Scotland, Catalonia and Wallonia.” Paper Presented at Fourth Conference of the ECPR Standing Group on Parliaments. Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodeigne, Jérémy. 2018. “Who Governs? The Disputed Effects of Regionalism on Legislative Career Orientation in Multilevel Systems.” West European Politics 41 (3): 728–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodeigne, Jérémy, Joanna Krukowska, and Aistė Lazauskienė. 2018. “‘The Mayors’ Political Career: Between Local and National Ambition.” In Political Leaders and Changing Local Democracy, edited by Hubert Heinelt, Annick Magnier, Marcello Cabria, and Herwig Reynaert, 109–147. Governance and Public Management. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodeigne, Jérémy, Daniela Vintila, and Laura Morales. Forthcoming. “The Social and Political Background of MPs of Immigrant Origin: Are They Any Different?” In Pathways to Power: The Political Representation of Citizens of Immigrant Origin in Seven European Democracies. Volume I, edited by Laura Morales, Thomas Saalfeld, and Maria Sobolewska. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzeel, Silvia, and Didier Caluwaerts. 2015. “Is It Gender, Ideology or Resources? Individual-Level Determinants of Preferential Voting for Male or Female Candidates.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 25 (3): 265–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferragina, Emanuele. 2012. Social Capital in Europe: A Comparative Regional Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiers, Stefaan, and Ineke Secker. 2007. “A Career Through the Party: The Recruitment of Party Politicians in Parliament.” In Democratic Representation in Europe Diversity, Change, and Convergence, edited by Maurizo Cotta and Heinrich Best. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaxie, Daniel, and Laurent Godmer. 2007. “Cultural and Political Selection: Educational Background of Parliamentarians.” In Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change and Convergence, edited by Maurizo Cotta and Heinrich Best. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, Reuven Y., and Gideon Rahat. 2011. Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Richard S. 1987. ‘Party Government and Its Alternatives’. In Party Governments: European and American Experiences, edited by Richard S. Katz, 1–26. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook, Mona Lena. 2010. “Why Are Fewer Women Than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 155–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, Jennifer L., and Richard L. Fox. 2005. It Takes a Candidate. Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilliefeldt, Emelie. 2012. “Party and Gender in Western Europe Revisited: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Gender-Balanced Parliamentary Parties.” Party Politics 18 (2): 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateo Diaz, Mercedes. 2005. Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Donald R. 1984. “Legislative Recruitment and Legislative Careers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9 (4): 547–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, Petra. 2012. “From Laggard to Leader: Explaining the Belgian Gender Quotas and Parity Clause.” West European Politics 35 (2): 362–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncrief, Gary F. 1999. “Recruitment and Retention in U. S. Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (2): 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niven, David. 1998. “Party Elites and Women Candidates.” Women & Politics 19 (2): 57–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa. 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obler, Jeffrey. 1974. “Intraparty Democracy and the Selection of Parliamentary Candidates: The Belgian Case.” British Journal of Political Science 4 (2): 163–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2014. Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, Chris T. 2005. “Black Substantive Representation in State Legislatures from 1971–1994.” Social Science Quarterly 86 (4): 779–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilet, Jean-Benoit, and Stefaan Fiers. 2004. “Les derniers écueils vers la parité politique en Belgique: Une analyse des élections régionales de 2004.” Swiss Political Science Review 14 (4): 767–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuhs, Robert R. 2007. “Descriptive Representation as a Mechanism to Mitigate Policy Backlash: Latino Incorporation and Welfare Policy in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (2): 277–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics. Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, Tom. 2001. “The Complementary Roles of Human and Social Capital.” Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2 (1): 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, Klaus. 2003. “Moving Up, Moving Down: Political Careers Across Territorial Levels.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (2): 223–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studlar, Donley T., and Ian McAllister. 2002. “Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women’s Legislative Representation Since 1950.” European Journal of Political Research 41: 233–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandeleene, Audrey. 2016. “Does Candidate Selection Matter? A Comparative Analysis of Belgian Political Parties’ Selection Procedures and Their Relation to the Candidates’ Profile.” PhD dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandeleene, Audrey, Jérémy Dodeigne, and Lieven De Winter. 2016. “What Do Selectorates Seek? A Comparative Analysis of Belgian Federal and Regional Candidate Selection Processes in 2014.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (7): 889–908.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jérémy Dodeigne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dodeigne, J., Teuber, F. (2019). The Effects of the Political Parties’ Selective Bias on Descriptive Representation: Analysis of the Candidates’ Sociological and Political Background. In: Vandeleene, A., De Winter, L., Baudewyns, P. (eds) Candidates, Parties and Voters in the Belgian Partitocracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96460-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics