Abstract
The characterization of the world of the ancient Greek city states as relatively poor and economically static has been refuted by recent advances in Greek economic history. The Greek world grew dramatically, compared to other premodern societies, both in population and per capita consumption from the age of Homer to that of Aristotle. By the fourth century BCE the city-state ecology was densely populated, and median consumption was well above bare subsistence. Athenian income inequality can be roughly measured using income and population estimates from late fourth century BCE. This paper argues that, at least in Athens, economic growth was accompanied by historically low levels of income inequality. Both economic growth and low inequality are explained by the development of citizen-centered political institutions. Growth, inequality, and institutions were important parts of the historical context in which Plato and Aristotle wrote. Attending to that context may elucidate some aspects of Greek political philosophy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a comprehensive survey of inequality in world history, see now Scheidel (2017). Some of the material in this chapter is adapted and updated from chapters 4 and 5 of Ober (2015a). Section 2.3 offers an abbreviated survey of results reported more fully in Ober (2017). I am indebted to Claire Taylor, Ian Morris , Walter Scheidel , Mirko Canevaro, David Lewis, Rob Fleck, Andy Hanssen, and Federica Carugati and to the organizers and participants in the UC San Diego conference for discussions and shared work in progress related to the issues addressed in this paper.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
The alternative demographic standard for measuring urbanization is the percentage of total population living in cities over 10,000. Based on de Vries’ (1984, p. 39, table 3.7) figures for European urbanization in 1600 (at the 10,000+ standard), Hellas was comparable to Holland (24.3%: 19 cities; de Vries 1984, table 3.1), which was the most urbanized part of Europe in 1600. Hellas was substantially more urbanized at the 10,000+ standard than any other European region in 1600: Northern Italy = 16.6% (30 cities); Mediterranean = 13.7% (101 cities); Europe overall = 7.6% (220 cities).
- 6.
Population growth leads to substantially lower living standards in most of the cities of Europe in 1500–1800: Allen (2001) and Deaton (2013, pp. 94–95). Disease: Scheidel (2007). Squalid conditions in the advanced economies of England and Holland: Kron (forthcoming). Greek life expectancy: Morris (2004, pp. 714–720), Kron (2005), and Reden (2007, pp. 388–390). Improved life expectancy for those surviving childhood: Morris (2004, p. 715, figure 2)
- 7.
It is important to keep in mind that the overall Gini wealth index for Athenian society as a whole, including slaves and metics, would surely be substantially higher—I cannot say how much higher because I know no way to calculate wealth of metics or slaves. Wealth inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, is typically much higher than income inequality, considered below.
- 8.
As Claire Taylor has pointed out to me, Morris misreported the Gini coefficient as 0.382–0.386, whereas it is actually c. 0.48 (taking the figure of 9% owning 35% of the land). But Morris’ general point remains valid. For example, in late eleventh century Song Dynasty China, an era in which real wages were higher and inequality was lower than in other periods in premodern Chinese history, the wealthiest 5% of the population is believed to have controlled 24% of the land and 34.3% of the population was landless, yielding a Gini coefficient of 0.50. Data from Liu (2015, pp. 127–133).
- 9.
- 10.
By way of early modern comparisons, Milanovic et al. (2011, table 2) report the income Gini for Tuscany in 1427 = 0.46; Holland in 1561 = 0.56; England and Wales in 1688 = 0.45; France in 1788 = 0.56.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
List and Speikermann (2013) demonstrates that a methodological focus on individuals as choice-making agents (in the form of “supervenience individualism”) is compatible with some forms of causal-explanatory “holism” in respect to considering institutions as collective actors. My two hypotheses assume that their compatibility thesis is correct.
- 15.
Emergence and the relationship between micro-level and high-level phenomena: Petitot (2010).
- 16.
My neologistic phrase “rule egalitarianism” (conceptually similar to what North et al. 2009 call “impersonality”) is modeled on the term “rule consequentialism,” commonly used by ethicists. The rule consequentialist focuses on social rules (as opposed to individual acts) that will maximize aggregate welfare (or alternatively, aggregate preference satisfaction).
- 17.
There is, of course, a good deal of specialization in centralized hierarchies—the complex monarchical civilizations of, e.g., Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Persia, would have not been possible without specialists. Yet hierarchies are relatively inefficient in allocating specialist training to individuals across the relevant population based on aptitude and motivation.
- 18.
Bankruptcy laws that limit personal losses, and rules of incorporation that protect individual investors, are familiar modern examples. Patron-client relationships and voluntary associations (e.g., burial societies) provided alternative, civil society, routes to similar ends in some ancient societies.
- 19.
Gallant (1991) assumes high levels of risk aversion on the part of ancient Greek subsistence farmers and suggests possible family risk-buffering strategies, based in part on evidence from subsistence farming in early modern Greece. But, if the arguments presented here are correct, the classical Greek economy was not predicated on the risk-aversion of families of subsistence farmers. Public insurance and risk: Burke (2005), Möller (2007, pp. 375–383), and Ober (2008, pp. 254–258). Mackil (2004) shows how which a somewhat similar risk insurance mechanism operated in some inter-polis relations.
- 20.
This passage is discussed in more detail in Ober (2015a, chapter 7).
- 21.
Strategic calculation based on formal rationality in Greek thought: Ober (2009). Compare North et al. (2009), who emphasize the behavioral implications of individuals being treated impersonally in institutional contexts. Note that I assume here not only formal equality of standing, but also some degree of freedom of choice in respect to occupation. Obviously in practice the extent of free choice varied considerably, but it is the overall effect of differences in opportunities and incentives that produces the result of relatively greater investment in human capital. See also Ober (2012).
- 22.
Whether the women themselves would have concurred with Socrates’ assessment, we cannot say.
- 23.
On the development of theories and practices of expertise in the Greek world, see Pyzyk (2015).
- 24.
- 25.
Greek egalitarianism: Cartledge (1996), Morris (1996), and Raaflaub (1996). Runciman (1990) emphasizes the historically remarkable level of Greek egalitarianism. Foxhall (2002, p. 218), by contrast, regards “substantial inequalities in landholding ” as a “paradox” that “I have never been able to resolve in my own mind.” The paradox arises, of course, if one supposes that egalitarianism requires either equal outcomes or equal opportunities (measured by equal access to all valuable resources). But, per above, rule egalitarianism assumes neither.
- 26.
This sort of investment in political, rather than specifically economic, skills may be a driver of increased use of slaves and other forms of unfree labor (Scheidel 2008, pp. 115–123). On the other hand, Xenophon (Memorabilia. 3.4) points out that that certain skills required for success in private business affairs are also valuable for managing public affairs (see Sobak 2015). Public goods are in general non-rival (i.e., not a fixed quantity, so that that their use is not subject to zero-sum competition) and non-exclusionary (i.e., all relevant persons have free access).
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
- 35.
- 36.
For more on such modern impediments, see Laitin (2007).
- 37.
Innovative adaptations of the institution of coined money is a good case in point; for some particularly interesting innovations in this domain, see Mackil and van Alfen (2006).
References
Acton, P.H. 2014. Poiesis: Manufacturing in classical Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allen, R.C. 2001. The great divergence in European wages and prices from the middle ages to the First World War. Explorations in Economic History 38: 411–447.
Baumol, W.J. 1993. Entrepreneurship, management, and the structure of payoffs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Beck, H., and P. Funke, eds. 2015. Federalism in Greek antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bintliff, J. 2012. The complete archaeology of Greece: From hunter-gatherers to the 20th century A.D. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bloom, D.E., D. Canning, and G. Fink. 2008. Urbanization and the wealth of nations. Science 319: 772–775.
Boix, C. 2015. Political order and inequality: Their foundations and their consequences for human welfare, Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bresson, A. 2016. The making of the ancient Greek economy: Institutions, markets, and growth in the city-states. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Burke, E.M. 2005. The habit of subsidization in classical Athens: Toward a Thetic Ideology. Classica et Mediaevalia 56: 5–47.
Cartledge, P. 1996. Comparatively equal. In Dêmokratia: A conversation on democracies, ancient and modern, ed. J. Ober and C.W. Hedrick, 175–186. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, E.E. 1992. Athenian economy and society: A banking perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
D’Angour, A. 2011. The Greeks and the new: Novelty in ancient Greek imagination and experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Vries, J. 1984. European urbanization 1500–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Deaton, A. 2013. The great escape: Health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fawcett, P. 2016. When I squeeze you with eisphorai. Taxes and tax policy in classical Athens. Hesperia 85: 153–199.
Figueira, T.J. 1998. The power of money: Coinage and politics in the Athenian empire. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Foxhall, L. 1997. A view from the top: Evaluating the Solonian property classes. In The development of the polis in archaic Greece, ed. L.G. Mitchell and P.J. Rhodes, 113–136. New York: Routledge.
———. 2002. Access to resources in classical Greece: The egalitarianism of the polis in practice. In Money, labour and land: Approaches to the economies of ancient Greece, ed. P. Cartledge, E.E. Cohen, and L. Foxhall, 209–220. New York: Routledge.
Gallant, T.W. 1991. Risk and survival in ancient Greece: Reconstructing the rural domestic economy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Goldstone, J. 2002. Efflorescences and economic growth in world history. Journal of World History 13: 323–389.
Gordon, D. 1999. Ants at work: How an insect society is organized. New York: Free Press.
———. 2010. Ant encounters: Interaction networks and colony behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. 2014. The ecology of collective behavior. PLoS Biology 12 (3): e1001805.
Greene, K. 2000. Technical innovation and economic progress in the ancient world: M.I. Finley reconsidered. The Economic History Review 53: 29–59.
Hansen, M.H. 1999. The Athenian democracy in the age of Demosthenes: Structure, principles and ideology. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
———. 2006. The shotgun method: The demography of the ancient Greek city-state culture. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Hanson, J.W. 2017. An urban geography of the Roman world, 100 BC to AD 300. Oxford: Archaeopress Archaeology.
Harris, E.M., D.M. Lewis, and M. Woolmer, eds. 2015. The ancient Greek economy: markets, households and city-states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jursa, M. 2010. Aspects of the economic history of Babylonia in the first millennium BC: Economic geography, economic mentalities, agriculture, the use of money and the problem of economic growth. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.
Kehoe, D.P., D. Ratzan, and U. Yiftach-Firanko. 2015. Law and transaction costs in ancient history. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kron, G. 2005. Anthropometry, physical anthropology, and the reconstruction of ancient health, nutrition, and living standards. Historia 54 (1): 68–83.
———. 2014. Comparative evidence and the reconstruction of the ancient economy: Greco-Roman housing and the level and distribution of wealth and income. In Quantifying the Greco-Roman economy and beyond, ed. F. de Callataÿ, 123–146. Bari: Edipuglia.
———. forthcoming. Growth and decline. Forms of growth. Estimating growth in the Greek world. In The Oxford handbook of economies in the classical world, ed. E.L. Cascio, A. Bresson, and F. Velde. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lagia, A. 2015. Diet and the polis: An isotopic study of diet in Athens and Laurion during the Classical, Hellenistic, and Roman periods. In Archaeodiet in the Greek world: Dietary reconstruction from stable isotope analysis (Hesperia Supplement), ed. A. Papathanasiou, M. Richards, and S.C. Fox, 119–146. Princeton: American School of Classical Studies at Athens.
Laitin, D.D. 2007. Nations, states, and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
List, C., and K. Spiekermann. 2013. Methodological individualism and holism in political science: A reconciliation. American Political Science Review 107 (4): 629–643.
Liu, W.G. 2015. The Chinese market economy 1000–1500. Albany: SUNY Press.
Mackil, E. 2004. Wandering cities: Alternatives to catastrophe in the Greek polis. American Journal of Archaeology 108: 493–516.
———. 2013. Creating a common polity: Religion, economy, and politics in the making of the Greek koinon. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mackil, E., and P.G. van Alfen. 2006. Cooperative coinages. In Agoranomia: Studies in money and exchange presented to John Kroll, ed. P.G. van Alfen, 201–246. New York: American Numismatic Society.
Milanovic, B., P.H. Lindert, and J.G. Williamson. 2011. Pre-industrial inequality. The Economic Journal 121 (551): 255–272.
Möller, A. 2007. Classical Greece: Distribution. In The Cambridge economic history of the Greco-Roman world, ed. W. Scheidel, I. Morris, and R.P. Saller, 362–384. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morris, I. 1987. Burial and ancient society: The rise of the Greek city-state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1996. The strong principle of equality and the archaic origins of Greek democracy. In Dêmokratia: A conversation on democracies, ancient and modern, ed. J. Ober and C.W. Hedrick, 19–49. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. 1998. Archaeology as a kind of anthropology (A response to David Small). In Democracy 2500? Questions and challenges, ed. I. Morris and K.A. Raaflaub, 229–239. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.
———. 2004. Economic growth in ancient Greece. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160 (4): 709–742.
———. 2010. Why the West rules—For now: The patterns of history and what they reveal about the future. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
Netz, R. 2002. Counter culture: Towards a history of Greek numeracy. History of Science 40 (3): 321–352.
North, D.C., J.J. Wallis, and B.R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and social orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ober, J. 2000. Political conflicts, political debates, and political thought. In The shorter Oxford history of Europe I: Classical Greece, ed. R. Osborne, 111–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2008. Democracy and knowledge: Innovation and learning in classical Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. 2009. Public action and rational choice in classical Greek political theory. In A companion to ancient political thought, ed. R.K. Balot, 70–84. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 2010a. Thucydides on Athens’ democratic advantage in the Archidamian War. In War, democracy and culture in classical Athens, ed. D. Pritchard, 65–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2010b. Wealthy Hellas. Transactions of the American Philological Association 140: 241–286.
———. 2012. Democracy’s dignity. American Political Science Review 106 (4): 827–846.
———. 2015a. The rise and fall of classical Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. 2015b. Classical Athens. In Fiscal regimes and political economy of early states, ed. W. Scheidel and A. Monoson, 492–522. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2017. Inequality in late-classical democratic Athens. Evidence and models. In Democracy and open economy world order, ed. G.C. Bitros and N.C. Kyriazis, 125–146. Berlin: Springer.
Oleson, J.P. 2008. Oxford handbook of engineering and technology in the classical world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Osborne, R. 1992. Is it a farm? The definition of agricultural sites and settlements in ancient Greece. In Agriculture in Ancient Greece, ed. B. Wells, 22–27. Stockholm: Paul Åströms Förlag.
Petitot, J. 2010. Reduction and emergence in complex systems. In Questioning nineteenth-century assumptions about knowledge: Reductionism (Fernand Braudel Center studies in historical social science), ed. R.F. Lee, 107–159. Binghamton: State University of New York Press.
Pyzyk, M. 2015. Economies of expertise: Knowledge and skill transfer in classical Greece. PhD dissertation. Stanford: Department of Classics, Stanford University.
Raaflaub, K. 1996. Equalities and inequalities in Athenian democracy. In Dêmokratia: A conversation on democracies, ancient and modern, ed. J. Ober and C.W. Hedrick, 139–174. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Runciman, W.G. 1990. Doomed to extinction: The polis as an evolutionary dead-end. In The Greek city, ed. O. Murray, 348–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sallares, R. 1991. The ecology of the ancient Greek world. London: Duckworth.
Scheidel, W. 2007. Demography. In The Cambridge economic history of the Greco-Roman world, ed. W. Scheidel, I. Morris, and R.P. Saller, 38–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2008. The comparative economies of slavery in the Greco-Roman world. In Slave systems: Ancient and modern, ed. E.D. Lago and C. Katsari, 105–126. New York: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2010. Real wages in early economies: Evidence for living standards from 1800 BCE to 1300 CE. Journal of the Social and Economic History of the Orient 53: 425–462.
———. 2017. The great leveler. Violence and the global history of inequality from the stone age to the present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Scheidel, W., and S.J. Friesen. 2009. The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire. Journal of Romance Studies 99: 61–91.
Scheidel, W., and A. Monson, eds. 2015. Fiscal regimes and political economy of premodern states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, H. 2007. Technology. In The Cambridge economic history of the Greco-Roman world, ed. W. Scheidel, I. Morris, and R.P. Saller, 144–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simonton, M. 2017. Classical Greek oligarchy: A political history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sobak, R. 2015. Sokrates among the Shoemakers. Hesperia 84: 669–712.
Taylor, C. 2017. Poverty, wealth, and well-being: Experiencing penia in democratic Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teegarden, D. 2014. Death to tyrants! Ancient Greek democracy and the struggle against tyranny. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
van Groningen, B.A. 1953. In the grip of the past: Essay on an aspect of Greek thought. Leiden: Brill.
van Liefferinge, K., et al. 2013. Reconsidering the role of Thorikos within the Laurion silver mining area (Attica, Greece) through hydrological analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science 41: 272–284.
von Reden, S. 2007. Consumption. In The Cambridge economic history of the Greco-Roman world, ed. W. Scheidel, I. Morris, and R.P. Saller, 385–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weingast, B.R. 1997. The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. American Political Science Review 91: 245–263.
Wilson, A. 2009. Approaches to quantifying Roman trade. In Quantifying the Roman economy: Methods and problems, ed. A.K. Bowman and A. Wilson, 13–49. New York: Oxford University Press.
———. 2011. City sizes and urbanization in the Roman Empire. In Settlement, urbanization, and population, ed. A.K. Bowman and A. Wilson, 161–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ober, J. (2018). Institutions, Growth, and Inequality in Ancient Greece. In: Anagnostopoulos, G., Santas, G. (eds) Democracy, Justice, and Equality in Ancient Greece. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 132. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96313-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96313-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96312-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96313-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)