Skip to main content

Cities and Population Aging: A Literature Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

The increasing population aging worldwide and the suitability of cities for this fact are the problems raised in this research. Through a literature review of articles from 2007 to 2017, indexed in the 24 Engineering III databases of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel of the ministry of education of Brazil, CAPES. These articles were selected by criteria of greater worldwide publication, highlighting concepts, foundations and theoretical outlines on active aging and the age-friendly cities in the world. The systematic review study followed the Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist instrument for article selection and for bibliometric analysis. In order to analyze the content of the constituted portfolio, criteria of scope, country and importance for the scientific community were assigned. The 24 selected articles are relevant to the implantation and evaluation of the age-friendly cities in the world. The United States and the United Kingdom are the countries with the largest publications on the subject researched, highlighting the worldwide concern about age pyramid change and longevity. The years of greatest publication of articles were 2014 and 2015 following the journal with the most articles on the subject found in this research, which was Ageing and Society. The authors with more than cross-citations were Bufell and Phillipson. The relevance of the study is proved by the number of publications found in the survey of 2168 articles and by the worldwide aging process that transforms today’s youth into the elderly of tomorrow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alavi M, Carlson P (1992) A review of MIS research and disciplinary development. J Manag Inf Syst 8(4):45–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1992.11517938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Antonietti M, Garett M (2012) Body capital and the geography of aging. Area 44(3):364–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01089.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biggs S, Carr A (2015) Age- and child-friendly cities and the promise of intergenerational space. J Soc Work Pract 29(1):99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.993942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buffel T, Mcgarry P et al (2014) Developing age-friendly cities: case studies from brussels and manchester and implications for policy and practice. J Aging Soc Policy 26(1–2):52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.855043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buffel T, Phillipson C (2016) Can global cities be “age-friendly cities”? Urban development and ageing populations. Cities 55:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buffel T et al (2012) Ageing in urban environments: developing “age-friendly” cities. Crit Soc Policy 32(4):597–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzgerald KG, Caro FG (2014) An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around the world. J Aging Soc Policy 26(1–2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.860786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Galvão FT et al (2015) Principais itens para relatar Revisões sistemáticas e Meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA. Epidemiol Serv Saúde 24(2):335–342. Print version ISSN 1679–4974. On-line version. ISSN 2237-9622. Brasília, April/June 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200017

  9. Garon S et al (2014) Collaborative partnership in age-friendly cities: two case studies from Quebec, Canada. J Aging Soc Policy 26(1–2):73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Green G (2013) Age-friendly cities of Europe. J Urban Health 90(SUPPL 1):116–128. Disponível em. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9765-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guimarães RMO (2008) mundo envelhece: é imperativo criar um pacto de solidariedade social. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 13:1115–1117. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232008000400005&lang=pt

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hein MA, Aragaki SS (2012) Saúde e envelhecimento: um estudo de dissertações de mestrado brasileiras (2000-2009). Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 17:2141–2150. http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232012000800024&lang=pt

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kendig H et al (2014) Developing age-friendly cities and communities in Australia. J Aging Health 26(8):1390–1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314532687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kerbler B (2015) Population ageing and urban space. Annales-Anali Za Istrske in Mediteranske Studije - Series Historia et Sociologia, 25(1):33–48. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84954320660&partnerID=40&md5=8074eddaf1b9de5b890446727d3f633

  15. Lui et al (2009) What makes a community age-friendly: a review of international literature. Australasian J Aging 28(3):116–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mcgarry P, Morris J (2011) A great place to grow older: a case study of how Manchester is developing an age-friendly city. Work Older People 15(1):38–46. https://doi.org/10.5042/wwop.2011.0119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Menec VH et al (2011) Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Can J Aging 30(3):479–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Aguiar Notari MH, de Macedo Fragoso MHJ (2011) A inserção do Brasil na política internacional de direitos humanos da pessoa idosa. Revista Direito GV 7:259–276. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-24322011000100013&lang=pt

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Novek S, Menec VH (2014) Older adults’ perceptions of age-friendly communities in Canada: a photovoice study. Ageing Soc 34(6):1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1200150X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petitot C et al (2010) To an age-friendly environment [Vers des environnements-amis des aînés]. Gerontologie et Societe 132(1):229–242. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77952338642&partnerID=40&md5=ba45af012dac63e108820ccd2c0fa37d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Oliveira SML, Pessa SLR (2018) The public spaces and relationship with leisure, sports and coexistence. FIEP BULLETIN. ISSN-0256-6419. Impresso

    Google Scholar 

  22. Plouffe L, Kalache A (2010) Towards global Age-Friendly cities: determining urban features that promote active aging. J Urban Health 87(5):733–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9466-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruza J et al (2015) Sustainable, age-friendly cities: an evaluation framework and case study application on Palo Alto, California. Sustain Cities Soc 14(1):390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scharlach AE et al (2014) Does the village model help to foster age-friendly communities? J Aging Soc Pol 26(1–2):181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Silva LRF (2008) Da velhice à terceira idade: o percurso histórico das identidades atreladas ao processo de envelhecimento. História, Ciências, Saúde- Manguinhos 15:155–168. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-59702008000100009&lang=pt

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Steels S (2015) Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: a review. Cities 47:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.02.004s

  27. Van Dijk D et al (2015) The ideal neighbourhood for ageing in place as perceived by frail and non-frail community-dwelling older people. Ageing Soc 35(8):1771–1795. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14000622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zubair M, Norris M (2015) Perspectives on ageing, later life and ethnicity: ageing research in ethnic minority contexts Ageing Soc 35(5):897–916. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14001536

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suelyn Maria Longhi de Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Oliveira, S.M.L., Pessa, S.L.R., Schenatto, F.J., de Lourdes Bernartt, M. (2019). Cities and Population Aging: A Literature Review. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_141

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics