Abstract
Many attempts have been made to classify gastric cancer in order to predict natural history, prognosis, and treatment responses of gastric cancer patients. However, only a few of them have been definitively embraced by physicians in their everyday decision-making process. Although some heterogeneity between classifications, criteria based on microscopic morphologic features have stood the test of time due to their simplicity and meaningful differences in molecular features and clinical outcomes among groups.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
In 1965, Laurén introduced a classification that would continue to prove its value many decades later. He recognized the existence of two major subtypes of gastric cancer: intestinal and diffuse [1]. This classification reveals profound differences in carcinogenesis, epidemiology, risk factors, molecular characteristics, prognosis, and, possibly, response to treatment. Diffuse-type adenocarcinomas have a number of special features that distinguish them from intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinomas.
Histologically, diffuse carcinomas show a lack of gland formation and less intercellular cohesion, leading to the detection of scattered small clusters of cells infiltrating the stroma, spatially separated from the primary tumor. These cells may or may not contain abundant cytoplasmic mucin producing the classic aspect of signet-ring cell. Laurén’s diffuse subtype includes signet-ring cell carcinoma, which was also included in various histologic classifications, such as undifferentiated type by Nakamura in 1968 [2], infiltrative type by Ming in 1977 [3], and high grade by the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control in 2010 [4].
Despite a progressive reduction in gastric cancer incidence and mortality, recent decades have witnessed a steady increase in the incidence of signet-ring cell gastric cancer from 0.3 cases per 100,000 persons in 1973 to 1.8 cases per 100,000 persons in 2000 in the USA [5]. Diffuse subtype is more often diagnosed at younger ages and is more evenly distributed between the sexes [6, 7].
Patients with Laurén’s diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma have a worse prognosis. Locoregional disease has shown increased risk of distant recurrence and peritoneal spread [8,9,10,11]. Furthermore, gastric cancer patients with advanced disease and diffuse subtype showed reduced overall survival in a recent meta-analysis [11].
In contrast to intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma , the diffuse subtype is less linked to environmental factors usually associated with multistep carcinogenesis, and precancerous lesions have not been identified. On the other hand, there is a strong association between diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma and hereditary diffuse gastric syndrome due to germline mutations in the cancer-predisposing gene CDH1 [12]. At the molecular level, hereditary or sporadic diffuse gastric cancer usually shows a lack of E-cadherin expression or other adhesion molecules, although association with Helicobacter pylori has also been detected [13]. The frequency of microsatellite instability, CDX2, and HER2 expression is reduced in diffuse gastric cancer in comparison to the intestinal-type subtype [14,15,16].
These molecular differences may have implications for personalized treatment strategies, although the appropriate design of a tailored approach remains under investigation. The present book will present detailed, current, state-of-the-art knowledge on diffuse gastric cancer, shedding light on its epidemiology, molecular characteristics, diagnosis, and surveillance and discuss appropriate treatment for affected patients . However, the science of many of these aspects is still evolving, and much remains to be discovered that will improve the care of patients suffering from diffuse gastric cancer.
References
Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49.
Nakamura K, Sugano H, Takagi K. Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances. Gan. 1968;59:251–8.
Ming SC. Gastric carcinoma. A pathobiological classification. Cancer. 1977;39:2475–85.
Edge S, Byrd D, Compton C. AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
Henson DE, Dittus C, Younes M, Nguyen H, Albores-Saavedra J. Differential trends in the intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma in the United States, 1973–2000: increase in the signet ring cell type. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:765–70.
Correa P, Sasano N, Stemmermann GN, Haenszel W. Pathology of gastric carcinoma in Japanese populations: comparisons between Miyagi prefecture, Japan, and Hawaii. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973;51:1449–59.
Piazuelo MB, Correa P. Gastric cancer: overview. Colomb Medica (Cali, Colomb). 2013;44:192–201.
Lee JH, Chang KK, Yoon C, Tang LH, Strong VE, Yoon SS. Lauren histologic type is the most important factor associated with pattern of recurrence following resection of gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018;267:105–13.
Chen Y-C, Fang W-L, Wang R-F, Liu C-A, Yang M-H, Lo S-S, et al. Clinicopathological variation of Lauren classification in gastric cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2016;22:197–202.
Qiu M, Cai M, Zhang D, Wang Z, Wang D, Li Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of Lauren classification in gastric adenocarcinoma in China. J Transl Med. 2013;11:58.
Stiekema J, Cats A, Kuijpers A, van Coevorden F, Boot H, Jansen EPM, et al. Surgical treatment results of intestinal and diffuse type gastric cancer. Implications for a differentiated therapeutic approach? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:686–93.
Yakirevich E, Resnick MB. Pathology of gastric cancer and its precursor lesions. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42:261–84.
Palestro G, Pellicano R, Fronda GR, Valente G, De Giuli M, Soldati T, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and intestinal metaplasia in subjects who had undergone surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma in Northwest Italy. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:7131–5.
Il PD, Yun JW, Park JH, Oh SJ, Kim HJ, Cho YK, et al. HER-2/neu amplification is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:1371–9.
Almeida R, Almeida J, Shoshkes M, Mendes N, Mesquita P, Silva E, et al. OCT-1 is over-expressed in intestinal metaplasia and intestinal gastric carcinomas and binds to, but does not transactivate, CDX2 in gastric cells. J Pathol. 2005;207:396–401.
Kim H, An JY, Noh SH, Shin SK, Lee YC, Kim H. High microsatellite instability predicts good prognosis in intestinal-type gastric cancers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:585–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Castria, T.B., Mota, J.M. (2018). Introduction. In: de Castria, T., Guindalini, R. (eds) Diffuse Gastric Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95234-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95234-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95233-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95234-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)