Abstract
In addition to analysing the gendered worldviews and opinions concerning representations of the sexes in adverts, student attitudes that also relate to advertising practice were explored; specifically of interest were positions taken by students that amount to assertions that the nature of the medium militates against representations that offer greater diversity and less gender stereotyping. The inferred support expressed by students for gender equality, for challenging and tackling issues facing women and girls both in society, and in advertising texts, as well as problematic portrayals of men in adverts, comes under scrutiny in this chapter and is shown to rest on shaky ground. When moving from the level of ‘surface’ or abstract avowal of the continued need to strive for genuine equality between the sexes, to concrete discussions of bringing that reality about, attitudes counter-productive to that struggle emerge. For instance, while there is certainly a strong awareness of the social responsibility of advertisers to accurately and fairly portray people, as well as a consciousness connected to the need to avoid stereotyping, possible steps towards active efforts to ensure that happens is largely met with one of three reactions: shrugged shoulders, suggesting there is little that can be done; scepticism that any action, regulatory or otherwise, would make a difference; or hostility to such measures, which is accompanied by recommendations that a sense of humour dilutes any perceived negative social impact of problematic gendered imagery in advertising texts. However, several students do demonstrate a ‘moral imagination’ in their musings on how they might avoid sexist and stereotypical representations of the sexes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
‘Taking the mick’ is a slang expression meaning to make fun of.
References
Baudrillard, J. (1998). The Consumer Society: Myths & Structures. London: Sage.
Coleman, C. A. (2012). Construction of Consumer Vulnerability by Gender and Ethics of Empowerment. In C. C. Otnes & L. Tuncay Zayer (Eds.), Gender, Culture, and Consumer Behavior. New York: Routledge.
Cronin, A. M. (2004). Regimes of Mediation: Advertising Practitioners as Cultural Intermediaries? Consumption Markets & Culture, 7(4), 349–369.
Drumwright, M. E., & Murphy, P. E. (2004). How Advertising Practitioners View Ethics: Moral Muteness, Moral Myopia, and Moral Imagination. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 7–24.
Eisend, M., Plagemann, J., & Sollwedel, J. (2014). Gender Roles and Humor in Advertising: The Occurrence of Stereotyping in Humorous and Nonhumorous Advertising and Its Consequences for Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 43(3), 256–273.
Ember, S. (2016, May 1). For Women in Advertising, It’s Still a “Mad Men” World. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/02/business/media/for-women-in-advertising-its-still-a-mad-men-world.html?_r=0
Fullerton, J., Kendrick, A., & Frazier, C. (2008). A Nationwide Survey of Advertising Students’ Attitudes About Advertising. Journal of Advertising Education, 12(1), 15–25.
Gallagher, A. (2014, March 29). Meet the Mad Women. The Irish Times Magazine, pp. 10–14.
Gill, R. (2011). Sexism Reloaded, or, It’s Time to Get Angry Again! Feminist Media Studies, 11(1), 61–71.
Ging, D., & Flynn, R. (2008). Background Paper on the Stereotyping of Women in Advertising in the Irish Media, pp. 1–91 [unpublished].
Gregory, M. R. (2009). Inside the Locker Room: Male Homosociability in the Advertising Industry. Gender Work and Organization, 16(3), 323–347.
Grow, J., & Deng, T. (2015). Tokens in a Man’s World: Women in Creative Advertising Departments. Media Report to Women, 43(1), 6–11 & 21–23.
Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2015). Sex, Gender and Work Segregation in the Cultural Industries. In B. Conor, R. Gill, & S. Taylor (Eds.), Gender and Creative Labour (pp. 23–36). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Jhally, S. (2011). Image-Based Culture: Advertising and Popular Culture. In G. Dines & J. M. Humez (Eds.), Gender, Race, and Class in Media. A Critical Reader (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Keller, C. J., Lavish, L. a., & Brown, C. (2007). Creative Styles and Gender Roles in Undergraduates Students. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 273–280.
Mallia, K. E. (2008). New Century, Same Story: Women Scarce When Adweek Ranks “Best Spots”. Journal of Advertising Education, 12(1), 5–14.
Marchand, R. (1985). Advertising the American Dream: Making way for Modernity, 1920–1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mattern, J. L., Child, J. T., Vanhorn, S. B., & Gronewold, K. L. (2013). Matching Creativity Perceptions and Capabilities: Exploring the Impact of Feedback Messages. Journal of Advertising Education, 17(1), 13–26.
McCorkle, D. E., & Alexander, J. (1991). The Effects of Advertising Education on Business Students’ Attitudes Toward Advertising. Journal of Education for Business, 67, 105–110.
Nixon, S. (2003). Advertising Cultures: Gender, Commerce, Creativity. London: Sage.
Nixon, S., & Crewe, B. (2004). Pleasure at Work? Gender, Consumption and Work-Based Identities in the Creative Industries. Consumption Markets & Culture, 7(2), 129–147.
Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the Creative Class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.
Saner, E. (2016, June 26). Advertising Is Dominated by White Guys Talking to White Guys. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jun/26/cindy-gallup-advertising-white-men-sex-tapes
Schweizer, T. S. (2006). The Psychology of Novelty-Seeking, Creativity and Innovation: Neurocognitive Aspects Within a Work-Psychological Perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 164–172.
Soar, M. (2000). Encoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising Production. Mass Communication and Society, 3(4), 415–437.
Taylor, M., & O’Brien, D. (2017). ‘Culture Is a Meritocracy’: Why Creative Workers’ Attitudes May Reinforce Social Inequality. Sociological Research Online, 22(4), 1–21.
Tuncay Zayer, L., & Coleman, C. A. (2015). Advertising Professionals’ Perceptions of the Impact of Gender Portrayals on Men and Women: A Question of Ethics. Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 264–275.
Whelehan, I. (2000). Overloaded: Popular Culture and the Future of Feminism. London: Women’s Press.
Windels, K. (2011). What’s in a Number? Minority Status and Implications for Creative Professionals. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 321–329.
Windels, K., & Lee, W.-N. (2012). The Construction of Gender and Creativity in Advertising Creative Departments. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 27(8), 502–519.
Windels, K., & Mallia, K. L. (2015). How Being Female Impacts Learning and Career Growth in Advertising Creative Departments. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 37(1), 122–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Driscoll, A. (2019). The Catch-22 of Advertising Practice (and Other Deflections): Perceived Challenges to Creating Less Sexist Content. In: Learning to Sell Sex(ism). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94280-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94280-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94279-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94280-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)