Skip to main content

3 Ecocriticism and Jim Crace’s Early Novels

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Jim Crace

Abstract

Bracke traces the depiction of nature in Crace’s novels through the lens of ecocriticism (The Gift of Stones, 1988; Signals of Distress, 1994; and Being Dead, 1999), exploring two developments in ecocriticism: a concern with the global and the development of econarratology. Early ecocriticism emphasized (non-fictional) realism and was indebted to the pastoral and skeptical of the contemporary (British) novel. Gradually, via engagement with science fiction and depictions of terra forming and awareness beyond the local, more recent ecocriticism has explored a wider variety, including contemporary British novels. These developments are paralleled in Crace’s novels, from the emphasis on pastoral, to engagements with the global (Signals of Distress and The Gift of Stones) and a concern with new materialism and non-human narration in Being Dead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For overviews of early ecocritical work, see Glotfelty and Fromm 1996 and Coupe 2000.

  2. 2.

    For an early example of ecocritical approaches to film, see Ingram 2004. More recently, see Lioi 2016.

  3. 3.

    See Bracke 2014 for a further discussion of early ecocriticism’s issues with the novel.

  4. 4.

    Lawrence Buell’s exploration of the different ‘waves’ in ecocriticism provides an overview of early ecocriticism’s focus, as well as how the field has developed (Buell 2011).

  5. 5.

    Goodbody and Rigby modify the traditional view of ecocriticism as ‘atheoretical’ somewhat. They point to the work of Patrick Murphy and SueEllen Campbell as examples of early ecocritical engagements with Bakhtinian dialogics and poststructuralism, respectively. Moreover, they point out that ‘the charge of ecocritical theory-phobia fails to recognise the theoretical moment that is implicit in the admittedly widespread rejection of the then dominant mode of critical or cultural theory by most first-wave ecocritics’ (Goodbody and Rigby 2011, 1).

  6. 6.

    Much ecofeminist scholarship follows in the footsteps of Val Plumwood. For examples of postcolonial ecocriticism, see Mukherjee 2010 and DeLoughrey and Handley 2011. For examples of material ecocriticism, see Iovino and Oppermann 2014 and Alaimo and Hekman 2008.

  7. 7.

    For an exploration of urban nature and Arctic nature, see Bracke 2018.

  8. 8.

    See Trexler 2015, 17–18 for an overview of ecocritical work since 2007 that has addressed climate crisis.

  9. 9.

    I explore this issue in depth in chapter one of Bracke 2018.

  10. 10.

    ‘What aesthetic forms might be most appropriate for articulating such a [deterritorialised environmental] vision by proposing that allegories of the global have given way, in the most innovative works of literature and art, to forms that deploy allegory in larger formal frameworks of dynamic and interactive collage or montage’ (Heise 2008, 10 ).

  11. 11.

    See Heise 2010 and Heise 2016 for the database as a way of depicting extinction.

  12. 12.

    See Crutzen 2002; Trexler 2015. The Anthropocene Working Group decided to place the beginning of the Anthropocene in the mid-twentieth century (Anthropocene Working Group 2016).

  13. 13.

    Lawrence Buell critiques such depictions for being ‘easily dismissible for their combination of recycling overly familiar “empty landscape” tropes and remoteness from the quotidian’ (Buell 2016, 11).

  14. 14.

    As Greg Garrard describes it, ‘[t]he fate of the Eiffel Tower, especially, preoccupies the documentary makers. … Life After People in particular remains preoccupied with technological structures such as bridges, dams and skyscrapers, combining CGI-stimulated time-lapse and Crime Scene Investigation-style forensic zooms that show us their point of maximum vulnerability’ (Garrard 2012, 52).

  15. 15.

    See Bernaerts et al. 2014; Herman 2011, 2014, 2016.

  16. 16.

    William Nelles points out that non-human narration and focalization are often easier to achieve in visual media. In the cartoon series The Simpsons, for instance, ‘scenes viewed through the dog’s eyes can be shown in black and white’ (Nelles 2001, 188).

  17. 17.

    Much of the scholarship on non-human narration can also be applied to the instances of non-human focalization I am concerned with.

  18. 18.

    This is precisely the dynamics that Bernaerts et al. identify (2014).

  19. 19.

    When ‘butting in’, Herman suggests, ‘a speaker voices an utterance of which he or she is not only author but also the principal, whereas when chipping in a speaker voices an utterance in which the spoken-for-party or parties function as co-principal(s)’ (Herman 2016, 2).

Works Cited

  • Alaimo, Stacey. 2010. Bodily Natures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, Stacey, and Susan Hekman. 2008. Material Feminisms. Bloomington/Indianapolis: University of Indiana Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthropocene Working Group. 2016. Media Statement. University of Leicester. Available Online: http://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/press/press-releases/2016/august/media-note-anthropocene-working-group-awg. Accessed 17 Aug 2017. Online.

  • Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begley, Adam. 2002. A Pilgrim in Craceland. Southwest Review 97 (2/3): 227–240. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernaerts, Luc, Marco Carocciolo, Luc Herman, and Bart Vervaeck. 2014. The Storied Lives of Non-Human Narrators. Narrative 21 (1): 68–93. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezan, Sarah. 2015. Necro-Eco: The Ecology of Death in Jim Crace’s Being Dead. Mosaic 48 (3): 191–207. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracke, Astrid. 2014. The Contemporary English Novel and Its Challenges to Ecocriticism. In The Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism, ed. Greg Garrard, 423–439. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Climate Crisis and the 21st-Century British Novel. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, Lawrence. 2011. Ecocriticism: Some Emerging Trends. Qui Parle 19 (2): 87–115. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Anthropocene Panic: Contemporary Ecocriticism and the Issue of Human Numbers. Framework 29 (2): 1–15. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Timothy. 2014. Nature, Post Nature. In The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Environment, ed. Louise Westling, 75–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, Laurence, ed. 2000. The Green Studies Reader. London/New York: Routledge. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crace, Jim. 2008 [1988]. The Gift of Stones. London: Picador. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008 [1994]. Signals of Distress. London: Picador. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010 [1999]. Being Dead. London: Picador. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul. 2002. Geology of Mankind. Nature 415: 23. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLoughrey, Elizabeth, and George Handley, eds. 2011. Postcolonial Ecologies: Literatures of the Environment. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, Greg. 2009. Ian McEwan’s Next Novel and the Future of Ecocriticism. Contemporary Literature 50 (4): 695–720. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Worlds without Us: Some Types of Disanthropy. SubStance 41 (1): 40–60. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glotfelty, Cheryll, and Harold Fromm, eds. 1996. The Ecocriticism Reader. Athens/London: University of Georgia Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodbody, Axel, and Kate Rigby. 2011. Introduction. In Ecocritical Theory. New European Approaches, ed. Axel Goodbody and Kate Rigby, 1–14. Charlottesville/London: University of Virginia Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, Dominic. 1998. The (Im)Possibility of Ecocriticism. In Writing the Environment, ed. Richard Kerridge and Neil Sammells, 27–39. London: Zed Books. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, Ursula. 2008. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Lost Dogs, Last Birds, and Listed Species: Cultures of Extinction. Configurations 18 (1–2): 49–72. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David. 2011. Storyworld/Umwelt. Nonhuman Experiences in Graphic Narratives. SubStance 40 (1): 156–181. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Narratology Beyond the Human. Diegesis 3 (2): 131–143. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Animal Autobiography; Or, Narration beyond the Human. Humanities 5 (4): 1–17. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, David. 2004. Green Screen: Environmentalism and Hollywood Cinema. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iovino, Serenella, and Serpil Oppermann, eds. 2014. Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Erin. 2015. The Storyworld Accord. Econarratology and Postcolonial Narratives. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lioi, Anthony. 2016. Nerd Ecology: Defending the Earth with Unpopular Culture. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Timothy. 2010. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, Upamanyu Pablo. 2010. Postcolonial Environments: Nature, Culture and the Contemporary Indian Novel. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Print. 

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelles, William. 2001. Beyond the Bird’s Eye: Animal Focalization. Narrative 9 (2): 188–194. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Stephen. 2012. “Dead but not departed yet”: the Exploration of Liminal Space in Jim Crace’s Being Dead (1999). Mortality 17 (1): 51–63. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London/New York: Routledge. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trexler, Adam. 2015. Anthropocene Fictions: the Novel in a Time of Climate Change. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weik von Mossner, Alexa. 2014. Science Fiction and the Risks of the Anthropocene: Anticipated Transformations in Dale Pendell’s The Great Bay. Environmental Humanities 5: 203–216. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid Bracke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bracke, A. (2018). 3 Ecocriticism and Jim Crace’s Early Novels. In: Shaw, K., Aughterson, K. (eds) Jim Crace. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94093-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics