Skip to main content

Abstract

The assumption of the advocates of liberal democracy is that the legislature should have an independent capacity to hold the executive accountable (Barkan 2005). This assumption premises on the role of the legislature as an instrument of accountability.

When fully developed, in terms of its capacity to perform its collective functions, the legislature is an institution of countervailing power that facilitates both horizontal accountability across governmental agencies, and downward accountability to the public (Barkan 2005, p.2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available at: http://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption/#define.

  2. 2.

    Available at: http://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption/#define.

  3. 3.

    Daily Trust, November 1, 2010.

  4. 4.

    Section 1(d), Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 as amended.

  5. 5.

    Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others; Democratic Alliance v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others [2016] ZACC 11.

References

  • Adamolekun, L. (2010). The Governors and the Governed: Towards Improved Accountability for Achieving good Development Performance. Africa Review 2(2), pp. 105–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayart, Jean-Francois (1993). The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly. New York: Longman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, J. (2005). Emerging Legislature or Rubber Stamp? The South African National Assembly after Ten Years of Democracy. Centre for Social Science Research (CSSR) Working Paper No. 134 University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, M. & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa. Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Business Day (27/11/2012). Something is Rotten in the State of Contemporary South Africa. Retrieved on March 1, 2016, from http://www.bdlive.co.za/opinion/2012/11/27/something-is-rotten-in-the-state-of-contemporary-sa

  • Chabal, P. & Daloz, J. P. (1999). Africa Works. Disorder as a political instrument. London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, G. W. & Patterson, S. C. (1998). Parliaments and Legislatures. In George Thomas Kurian (ed.) World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures vol. I. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, E. A. (2016). The epidemic of corruption has been identified in South Africa: How do We Solve It?’ Unpublished work. Accessed on January 19, 2018, from https://scholarworks.bridgeport.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/1502/72-nonempirical_research_poster_template2_2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Fagbadebo, O. M. (2016). Exploring the Politics of Impeachment in Nigeria’s Presidential System: Insights from selected States in the Fourth Republic, 1999–2007. PhD dissertation submitted to the University of KwaZulu-Natal, April 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • February, J. (2015). South Africa is in a spine-chilling crisis’ Daily maverick, December 10. Accessed on December 10, 2017, from http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2015-12-10-south-africa-is-in-a-spine-chilling-crisis/#.VyCGNvl96ig

  • Geldenhuys, D. (2015). The Weak Domestic base of South Africa’s good Global Citizenship. South African Journal of International Affairs. 22(4), pp. 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. C. (1989). Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946-86. The American Political Science Review, 83(3), pp. 773–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, K. (2011). The Fates of Presidents in Post-Transition Latin America: From Democratic Breakdown to Impeachment to Presidential Breakdown’, Journal of Politics in Latin America, 3(1), pp.125–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kada, N. (2003). The Role of Investigative Committees in the Presidential Impeachment Processes in Brazil and Colombia. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 28(1), pp. 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, W. J. (1966). State Legislatures in American Politics (Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Legislative Sector South Africa. (2011). Oversight Model of the South African Legislative Sector. Retrieved on March 10, 2018, from http://www.gpl.gov.za/gpl/372-oversight-model-of-the-south-african-legislative-sector/file

  • Malala, J. (2015). We have now begun our Descent: How to Stop South Africa Losing its way. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masutha, M. (2014). The Role of Constitutional Institutions Supporting Democracy in Facilitating Effective and Proactive Oversight over the Executive. Journal of the South African Legislative Sector 1(1), pp. 64–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, R. (2011). Accountability. In Badie, B., Berg-Schlosser, D. & Morlino, L. eds. International Encyclopedia of Political Science. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959636.n1, pp. 1–14.

  • Norton, P. & Ahmed, N. (1999). Legislatures in Asia: Exploring Diversity. In Philip Norton & Nizam Ahmed (eds.) Parliaments in Asia. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. & Olson, D. M. (1996). The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. (1998a). (ed.) Parliaments and Governments in Western Europe vol. 1. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. (1998b). Introduction: The Institution of Parliament. In Philip Norton (ed.) Parliaments and Governments in Western Europe vol 1. London: Frank Cass

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. (2008). Dissonances. Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleszek, W. J. (2014). Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2015). Democratic Order, Autonomy, and Accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 28(4), pp. 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Linan, A. (2014). A Two-Level Theory of Presidential Instability. Latin American Politics and Society, 56(1), pp. 35–54.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2014.00220.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. and White, G. (1998). The Democratic Developmental State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (2016). What Does “Governance” Mean? Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12212, pp. 1–5.

  • Schedler, A. (1999). Conceptualizing Accountability. In Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner (eds.). The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New DemocraciesLondon: Lynne Rienner Publ. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. Corruption Perceptions Index 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, N. (2001). African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, V. (2005). The Accountability Function of Parliament in New Democracies: Tanzanian Perspectives. Working Paper 2005:2, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omololu Fagbadebo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fagbadebo, O. (2019). Introduction: Understanding the Legislature as an Instrument of Accountability. In: Fagbadebo, O., Ruffin, F. (eds) Perspectives on the Legislature and the Prospects of Accountability in Nigeria and South Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93509-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics