Abstract
Most attempts at forecasting the future depend, explicitly or implicitly, on knowledge about the past, whether this is then used to offer possible analogies or to support normative theories with data about past events and trends. This approach is open to criticism both on the grounds of its assumptions about continuity and a tendency toward deterministic thinking and on the grounds that our knowledge of the past is less secure and more discursive than such attempts at prediction assume. Counterfactualism, the development and exploration of accounts of “what might have been” – which can be focused on obtaining better understanding of the past, or on refining theories of the present, or on speculations about the future – offers an alternative approach that emphasizes the openness of historical developments. Its primary role is not to improve forecasting but to highlight its limitations, to expand our knowledge of how humans think about the future and the cognitive biases that dominate such thinking, and to establish the ethical imperative of engaging with possible futures. The qualities which make counterfactualism a marginal and suspect activity within historiography and social science are precisely those which make it an essential aspect of the discipline of anticipation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Allison, G., & Ferguson, N. (2016). Establish a White House Council of Historical Advisers now. http://www.belfercenter.org/project/applied-history-project#!our-manifesto. Accessed 8 July 2017.
Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ben-Menahem, Y. (2016). If counterfactuals were excluded from historical reasoning…. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10, 370–381.
Black, J. (2008). What if? Counterfactualism and the problem of history. London: Social Affairs Unit.
Carr, E. H. (1964). What is history? London: Penguin.
Cass R. Sunstein, (2016) Historical explanations always involve counterfactual history. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10(3), 433–440.
Elster, J. (1978). Logic and society. Chichester: Wiley.
Elster, J. (2015). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, R. J. (2014). Altered pasts: Counterfactuals in history. New York: Little, Brown.
Ferguson, N. (Ed.). (2011). Virtual history: Alternatives and counterfactuals. London: Penguin.
Fogel, R. (1964). Railroads and American economic growth: Essays in econometric history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Frase, P. (2016). Four futures: Life after capitalism. London: Verso.
Hawthorn, G. (1991). Plausible worlds: Possibility and understanding in history and the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawthorn, G. (2014). Thucydides on politics: Back to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James, W. (1956). The dilemma of determinism, in the will to believe [1884] (pp. 145–183). New York: Dover.
Judt, T. (2010). Postwar: A history of Europe since 1945. London: Vintage.
Kahnemann, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaye, S. T. (2010). Challenging certainty: The utility and history of counterfactualism. History and Theory, 49(1), 38–57.
Koselleck, R.. (2004). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time (trans: Tribe, K.). New edn. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lebow, R. N. (2010). Forbidden fruit: Counterfactuals in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
Liveley, G.. (2017). Anticipation and narratology. In R. Poli (Ed.), Handbook of anticipation. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_7-1.
Mitchell, A.. (2013). Stumbling into eternity. Blog post. https://worldlyir.wordpress.com/2013/12/10/stumbling-into-eternity/. Accessed 26 July 2017.
Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2014). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morley, N. (2001). The transformation of roman Italy. Journal of Romance Studies, 91, 50–62.
Morley, N. (2014). Thucydides and the idea of history. London: I.B. Tauris.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning and influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poli, R. (2017). Introducing anticipation. In R. Poli (Ed.), Handbook of anticipation: Theoretical and applied aspects of the use of future in decision making (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer.
Tetlock, P. E., & Belkin, A. (1996). Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. In P. E. Tetlock & A. Belkin (Eds.), Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives (pp. 3–38). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tordoff, R. (2014). Counterfactual history and Thucydides. In V. Wohl (Ed.), Probabilities, hypotheticals and counterfactuals in ancient Greek thought (pp. 101–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tucker, A. (1999). Historiographical counterfactuals and historical contingency. History and Theory, 38(2), 264–276.
Tucker, A. (2016). Historiographic counterfactuals and the philosophy of historiography. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10, 333–348.
Weber, S. (1996). Counterfactuals, past and future. In P. E. Tetlock & A. Belkins (Eds.), Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives (pp. 268–290). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wright, T. J. (2017). All measures short of war: The contest for the 21st century and the future of American power. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wrigley, E. A. (1988). Continuity, chance and change: The character of the industrial revolution in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Morley, N. (2019). Counterfactualism and Anticipation. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91554-8_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91554-8_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91553-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91554-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities