Skip to main content

Preclassical Mechanics in Context: Practical and Theoretical Knowledge Between Sovereignty, Religion, and Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emergence and Expansion of Preclassical Mechanics

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 270))

Abstract

This chapter delineates a map of mutual dependencies between sovereign rulers, religious establishment, scientists, engineers as well as artists in the early modern Catholic world, circa 1550–1650. The juridical structure of sovereign states is the subject of the first section. The effect of military and economic pressures is discussed in the second section and the disciplining power of religion in the third. The fourth section shortly presents a case study that exemplifies the way traditional mechanical knowledge was transformed and also how it operated in the service of state and church.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 07 February 2019

    The book was inadvertently published with few errors in chapter 6 “A Journey to the Center of the Earth: Cosmology and the Centrobaric Theory from Antiquity to the Renaissance”.

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter is based on an earlier paper published in Il Caso Galileo: una rilettura storica, filosofica, teologica, eds. M. Bucciantini et al., 47–74. Florence: Olschki 2011.

  2. 2.

    Author’s pagination. All translations from the Relazione have been done by the author: “…fu intimate la Congregazione per gli 5 Novembre, tempo quando La Citta’, e le Cittadine, e le Scolari suole essere ripiena” Relazione Parma (1614).

  3. 3.

    “coltelli, forcine, cuchiari, boccali, bichieri, Lucerne, cattini per Le mani, vasi per l’acqua benedetta, insino la carta, penne, calamari, temperini, forbicette, et altro. Segno evidente dell’isquisitissima sua providenza,” Relazione Parma (1614).

  4. 4.

    [Author’s pagination]: “…e con molto affetto si parlo’, monstrando quanta sia la stima che egli fa della Compagnia, quanto L’amore che le porta, quanto il contento di vederli congregate,” Relazione Parma (1614).

  5. 5.

    “Li riceve’ con quella grandezza; e maiesta; colla quale suole ricevere gran Personaggi. Ardevano nelle Scalle, nelle Sale, e nelle Camere torchie, e candelle, che uguagliavano il chiaro del giorno” Relazione Parma (1614).

  6. 6.

    Author’s pagination: “Il doppo pranzo, si attendeva alle dispense, che fuorono quarto di Teologia e una di Filosofia (per che un’altra si differi’ per la causa che abbasso si dira’) con grande frequenza di Letteratti, scolari, e Religiosi, molti de quail venero da alter Citta’ circonvicine, per intervenirvi, et argomentare. Si dimonsstrarono, anche due Problemi curiosissimi nella matematica/ L’uno per che quando il raggio del Sole, per buco di qualsivoglia figura, nel Luogo non dimeno ove termina, si mostra circolare; l’altro come qualunque opera fatta di metallie varij, oro, argento, bronzo, o’ altri restando intiera, si sappia quanto di ciaschedun metallo vi sia dentro,” Relazione Parma (1614).

  7. 7.

    “Why is it that when the sun passes through quadrilaterals, as for instance in wickerwork, it does not produce a figure rectangular in shape but circular?” Aristotle (1936, 1:333).

  8. 8.

    On the complex uses of the magic lantern, for example, see Vermeir (2005); on the use of projection in the theatre, see Gorman (2003). Particularly interesting is the following passage relying on the description of Jean Baptiste du Halde’s Description geographique, historique, chronologique, et physique de l’empire de la chine et de la Tartarie Chinoisie published in Paris in 1735, where he narrates how: “Claudio Filippo Grimaldi (1639–1712) entertained them [namely the emperor and his entourage] in the gardens of the summer residence, using convex lenses, camera obscura and cylindrical and pyramidal mirrors to cast shadows and project images from the outside world,” Gorman (2003, 14).

  9. 9.

    The letter to the reader mentions Clavius and the good will he showed toward Ghetaldi: “Etenim cum Clauium, quod iam diu cupiebam, vidissem, nec minorem tanta scientia, & fama viri benignitatem comperissem ...” Ghetaldi (1603).

  10. 10.

    For a thorough discussion of Ghetaldi’s work, see Napolitani (1988, 139–237).

  11. 11.

    Sixteenth proposition of the eighth theorem, Ghetaldi (1603, 28); for a critique of Archimedes’ principle of buoancy from an Aristotelian perspective, see Helbing (1989, 64–74; 203–225).

  12. 12.

    On Bardi’s problem, see Celia and Paolo (1997); On the identification of Grienberger as the probable author of Bardi’s problem, see Gorman (2003, 25).

  13. 13.

    “Materiam abunde suppeditabit experientia; quae, ut gravissimae pugnae causa extitit, ita par est., primum ut ipsa locum in hac velitatione obtineat, militem ipsa cogat, armis instruat, ac praemijs invitet; quaeve ad fortiter pugnandum adhortata est., prima in acie, prima ipsa constituat” Bardi (1614, 6).

  14. 14.

    A description of the hall with reproductions of the representations is in BBP, Ms. Parm. 1250, [Pietro Mazza] Gran sala d’armi e delle academie che esisteva nella parte dell’acntico edifizio del collegio de’ nobili di Parma... . See in Turrini (2006, 43).

  15. 15.

    Pianta del collegio dei nobili di Parma. Il primo piano, Turrini (2006, 310).

References

  • Alfani, Guido. 2013. Calamities and the economy in Renaissance Italy: The grand tour of the horsemen of the apocalypse. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Kirsti, and Henk J.M. Bos. 2006. Pure mathematics. In The Cambridge history of science: Early modern science, ed. Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 697–723. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1936. Aristotle in twenty-three volumes. Vol. 1, Aristotle problems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, The Loeb Classical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1941. In On the heavens, ed. Richard McKeon, 395–466. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldini, Ugo. 1989. Archimede nel seicento italiano. In Archimede: mito, tradizione, scienza, ed. Corrado Dollo, 237–289. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Legem impone subactis: Studi su filisofia e scienza dei gesuiti in Italia 1540–1632. Rome: Bulzoni.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. S. Rocco e la scuola scientific della provincial veneta: il quadro storico (1600–1772). In Gesuiti e universita in Europa (secoli XVI– XVIII), ed. Gian Paolo Brizzi and Roberto Greci, 283–323. Bologna: Clueb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardi, Giovanni. 1614. Eorum quae vehuntur in aquis experimenta. Rome: Bartolomaei Zannetti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jim. 2006. The mechanical arts. In The Cambridge history of science: Early modern science, ed. Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 677–695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Early modern mathematical instruments. Isis 102 (4): 697–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biagioli, Mario. 1993. Galileo, courtier: The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bireley, Robert. 1981. Religion and politics in the age of the counter reformation. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. The counter-reformation prince anti-Machiavellianism or Catholic statecraft in early modern Europe. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Jean. 1967. Six books of the Commonwealth, 1576. Trans. M.J. Tooley. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschiero, Luciano. 2007. Experiment and natural philosophy in seventeenth–century Tuscany: The history of the Accademia del Cimento, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 21. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botero, Giovanni. 1956. The reason of state. Trans. P.J. and D.P. Waley. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerota, Filippo. 2004. Galileo’s eye: Linear perspective and visual astronomy. Galileana. Istituto e museo di storia della scienza 1: 143–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessandro, Alessandro. 1980. Materiali per la storia dello studium di Parma 1545–1622. In Università, Principe, Gesuiti. La politica farnesiana dell’istruziane a Parma e Piacenza 1545–1622, ed. Gian Paolo Brizzi Alessandro and Alessandra del Fante. Rome: Bulzoni.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Celia, Francesco Paolo. 1997. Relazzioni romane: l’idraulica galileiana negli scritti di Giovanni Bardi e Giuseppe Biancani. Vol. 3. Bari: G. Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, Kelly. 2006. Sites of military science and technology. In The Cambridge history of science: Early modern science, ed. Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 306–319. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and experience: The mathematical way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Del Negro, Piero. 2002. Una lingua per la guerra: il Rinascimento militare italiano. In Storia d’Italia 18. Guerra e pace, ed. Walter Barberis, 299–336. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2008. Sovereignty: God, state, and self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Allan P., ed. 1970. The Jesuit Ratio Studiorum of 1599. Washington, DC: Conference of Major Superiors of Jesuits. http://www.bc.edu/sites/libraries/ratio/ratio1599.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, Antonio. 1968. (Reprint). Le opere di Galileo Galilei. Florence: G. Barbèra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, Mordechai, and Navarro–Brotons Victor, eds. 2006. Universities and science in the early modern period, Archimedes. Vol. 12. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhay, Rivka. 2006. Religion. In The Cambridge history of science: Early modern science, ed. Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston, 727–755. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Jesuits: Transmitters of the new science. In Il caso Galileo: Una rilettura storica, filosofica, teologica, ed. Massimo Bucciantini, Michele Camerota, and Franco Giudice, 47–74. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galluzzi, Paolo. 1979. Momento. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghetaldi, Marino. 1603. Promotus Archimedis. Rome: Aloysium Zannettum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, Michael John. 2003. Mathematics and modesty in the Society of Jesus: The problems of Christoph Grienberger. In The new science and Jesuit science, Archimedes, ed. Mordechai Feingold, vol. 6, 1–120. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, Michael J. 2007. Projecting nature in early modern Europe. In Inside the camera obscura: Optics and art under the spell of the projected image. Preprint 333, ed. Wolfgang Lefèvre, 31–50. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science,. https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/Preprints/P333.PDF.

  • Hale, John Rigby. 1998. War and society in Renaissance Europe, 1450–1620. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, Mario Otto. 1989. La filosofia di Francesco Buonamici: professore di Galileo a Pisa. Pisa: Nistri-Lischi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmo, Hent, and Quentin Skinner, eds. 2010. Sovereignty in fragments: The past, present and future of a contested concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, Walter Roy, and S. Sophie Roux, eds. 2008. Mechanics and natural philosophy before the Scientific Revolution. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J., J.W. O’Malley, G.A. Bailey, and S.J. Harris, eds. 2006. The Jesuits II: Cultures, sciences and the arts 1540–1773. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, David C. 1968. The theory of pinhole images from antiquity to the thirteenth century. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 5 (2): 154–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1988. In The prince, ed. Q. Skinner and R. Price. Lancaster: Lancaster University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Dell’arte della Guerra. Rome: Salerno.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The prince and other writings. New York: Barnes and Noble Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malet, Antoni. 2003. Kepler and the telescope. Annals of Science 60: 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Early conceptualizations of the telescope as an optical instrument. Early Science and Medicine 10 (2): 237–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meli, Domenico Bertoloni. 2006. Thinking with objects: The transformation of mechanics in the seventeenth century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitani, Pier Daniele. 1988. La geometrizzazione della realtà fisica: il peso specifico in Ghetaldi e in Galileo. Bollettino di storia delle scienze matematiche 8: 139–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paci, Renzo. 2005. La guerra nell’Europa del cinquecento e il generale Achille Tarducci da Corinaldo. Ancona: Proposte e ricerche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Geoffrey. 1996. The military revolution: Military innovation and the rise of the west, 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrizi, Francesco. 1583. La Militia Romana di Polibio, di Tito Livio, e di Dionigi Alicarnaseo. Da Francesco Patricii dichiarata, e con varie figure illustrata. Ferrara: Domenico Mamarelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, Paolo. 1987. The papal prince, one body and two souls: The papal monarchy in early modern Europe. Trans. S. Haskins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relazione Parma. 1614. Relazione dell’accoglimento fatto dal Serenissimo Duca Rannuzio primo, alla Congregazione Provinciale tenutasi in Parma l’anno 1614. ASPr, Casa e Corte farnesiane, b. 56. fasc. 15., second page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Jürgen, and Peter Damerow. 2012. The equilibrium controversy: Guidobaldo Del Monte’s critical notes on the mechanics of Jordanus and Benedetti and their historical and conceptual backgrounds. Berlin: Edition Open Access. http://www.edition-open-sources.org/sources/2/index.html.

  • Richelieu, Armand Jean du Plessis. 1688. Testament politique d’Armand du Plessis, cardinal duc de Richelieu, … Partie 1. Amsterdam: H. Desbordes. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5427451c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, William. 1971. Galileo’s discourse on floating bodies: Archimedean and Aristotelian elements. In Actes du XIIe Congres international d’Histoire des Sciences, Paris 1968, vol. IV, 149–153. Paris: A. Blanchard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, Christoph. 1619. Oculus hoc est: Fundamentum opticum. Innsbruck: apud Danielem Agricolam.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1626–1630. Rosa Ursina sive Sol. Braccioni: Apud Andream Phaeum. Typographum Ducalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turrini, Miriam. 2006. Il giovin signore in collegio: i gesuiti e l’educazione della nobiltà nelle consuetudini del collegio ducale di Parma. Bologna: Clueb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valleriani, Matteo. 2010. Was Galileo an engineer? In Galileo Engineer, 193–211. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2017. The structures of practical knowledge. Cham: Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, Koen. 2005. The magic of the magic lantern (1660–1700): On analogical demonstration and the visualization of the invisible. The British Journal for the History of Science 38 (2): 127–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rivka Feldhay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Feldhay, R. (2018). Preclassical Mechanics in Context: Practical and Theoretical Knowledge Between Sovereignty, Religion, and Science. In: Feldhay, R., Renn, J., Schemmel, M., Valleriani, M. (eds) Emergence and Expansion of Preclassical Mechanics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 270. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90345-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90345-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90343-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90345-3

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics