Abstract
The paper analyzes the issue of general principles of international law as a distinct concept from that of general principles of law recognized in foro domestico. The authors maintain that any discussion on the nature and the functions of these principles in contemporary international law must consider, on the one hand, the framework of general theories of law and, on the other, the role that general principles of international law play in a structurally changed legal system, which is becoming increasingly based upon the recognition of common values. The paper is structured in five sections, with Sect. 1 being the introduction and Sect. 2 dealing with the theme of principles in the general theory of law. Then the doctrinal positions on the general principles of international law are examined (Sect. 3); and the authors’ theory on these principles is presented (Sect. 4). The conclusions drawn (Sect. 5) confirm that general principles of international law derive both from abstraction/induction from existing customary norms and from the general recognition by the international community, broadly understood. In the authors’ view, the second category of principles is more relevant and prevailing in the most recent international practice. Such a category confirms that recently a process of widening the foundations of general international law has occurred, with reference to certain shared and fundamental values emerging from the consensus of the international community. Most of these values tend towards goals of global justice.
Respectively, Professor of International Law, University of Siena and Associate Professor of International Human Rights Law, University of Siena, Italy. Sections 1, 2, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 were written by Riccardo Pisillo Mazzeschi. Sections 3, 4.4 and 5 were written by Alessandra Viviani.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The literature on principles is very extensive. See, inter alia, Dworkin (1967), pp. 14–46; Id. (1978), Ch. 2 and 3; Id. (1986), Ch. 10 and 11; Hart (1994), pp. 254–268; Rawls (1972), esp. Ch. II; Raz (1972), pp. 823–854; MacCormick (1978); Stone (1981), pp. 224–252; Bobbio (1994), pp. 257–279; Nino (1996), pp. 370–388; Alexy (1996); Id. (2000), pp. 294–304; Id. (2003), pp. 433–449.
- 3.
On this theory see, e.g., Minda (1995), Ch. 3. Within the modern normative theory, one may include the “movement of fundamental rights” and the “process-oriented theory”. In turn, within the “movement of fundamental rights”, one may distinguish between an interpretative and a non-interpretative approach.
- 4.
The term “neo-constitutionalism” can be used with very different meanings. In the theory of law and in the present work, the term “neo-constitutionalism” means a unitary stream of the theory and philosophy of law, which has developed some general theses about law. These theses mainly concern: (a) the connection between law and morality; (b) the nature of law as an interpretative practice; (c) the rationality of the law enforcement process; (d) the twofold dimension (factual and ideal) of law; (e) the clear distinction between rules and principles. These theses intend to overcome the traditional conceptions of law, especially legal positivism and realism. Note that the main exponents of neo-constitutionalism do not qualify themselves as advocates of natural law, but rather as non-positivists; but in reality, in our view, neo-constitutionalism, insisting on the connection between law and morality, the existence of an objective morality, and the ideal dimension of law, can be considered as a particular current of contemporary natural law theories. See, e.g., Dworkin (1967), pp. 14–46; Id. (1978), Ch. 2 and 3; Id. (1986), Ch. 10 and 11; Nino (1996), pp. 370–388; Alexy (1996); Id. (2000), pp. 294–304; Id. (2003), pp. 433–449.
- 5.
See Minda (1995), Parts II and III.
- 6.
See esp. Hart (1994), pp. 238–276.
- 7.
See, inter alia, ‘Legal Positivism’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-positivism/.
- 8.
Hart (1994), esp. Ch. V, VI and VII.
- 9.
Ibid., Ch. X.
- 10.
See, inter alia, ‘Natural Law Theories’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-theories.
- 11.
See supra fn. 4. On neo-constitutionalism see also Bongiovanni (2013), pp. 84–116.
- 12.
Dworkin (1978), esp. Ch. 2 and 3.
- 13.
Ibid., p. 22.
- 14.
- 15.
Dworkin (1978), pp. 22–23, 28–29.
- 16.
Ibid., p. 22.
- 17.
Ibid.
- 18.
Guastini (1993), pp. 452–455.
- 19.
Dworkin (1978), p. 28.
- 20.
On this issue see Pino (2016), Ch. IV, pp. 73–96. This writer speaks of a “marked” and a weak” distinction between principles and rules.
- 21.
- 22.
Ibid., p. 26.
- 23.
See, e.g., Hart (1994), pp. 260–263.
- 24.
Guastini (1993), pp. 77, 449–450.
- 25.
Ibid.
- 26.
Zagrebelski (1992), p. 149.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
Hart (1994), pp. 261–263.
- 30.
However, some writers maintain that also rules may have the dimension of “weight” and may be balanced against a conflicting rule or principle. See Pino (2016), p. 83.
- 31.
For these distinctions see Guastini (1993), pp. 448–452.
- 32.
D’Amato (2011), p. 165.
- 33.
Besson (2010), pp. 163–185.
- 34.
It must be noted that in early arbitration cases principles derived from national legal systems to fill the gaps in international law were used. See Affaire Yuille Shortridge et Cie and PCA’s Russia Indemnity Case (Russia v Turkey): Différend opposant la Grande-Bretagne et le Portugal dans l’affaire Yuille, Shortridge & Cie. Sentence prononcée par le Sénat de la Ville libre de Hambourg le 21 Octobre 1861, RSA, vol. XXIX, pp. 57–71; PCA, Russian Claim for Interest on Indemnities: Damages Claimed by Russia for Delay in Payment of Compensation Owned to Russian Injured During the War of 1877–1878, Award of 11 November 1912.
- 35.
PCIJ/Advisory Committee of Jurists, Procès-verbaux, 16 June- 24 July 1920, Annexes 310–319 (1920).
- 36.
Gaja (2013), para. 3.
- 37.
PCIJ, Factory at Chorzow (Germany v Poland), Jurisdiction, Judgment of 27 July 1927, Series A, N° 9, esp. p. 31. Similarly, a principle based on both national law and arbitration awards has been used by the ICJ, Corfù Channel (Albania v UK), Merits, Judgment of 9 April 1949, ICJ Reports, 1949, p. 18.
- 38.
ICJ, Oil Platform (Iran v US), Judgment of 6 November 2003, ICJ Reports 2003, p. 324 Judge Simma Separate Opinion paras. 66–74. See Biddulph and Newman (2014), p. 295.
- 39.
ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996, ICJ Reports 1996, p. 226. In his Separate Opinion Judge Fleischauer considers that the right to a have access to a remedy exists both under customary and national law.
- 40.
ICJ, South West Africa (Ethiopia v South Africa, Liberia v South Africa), Second Phase, Judgment of 18 July 1966, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Tanaka, ICJ Reports 1966, p. 6.
- 41.
De Visscher (1933), p. 406.
- 42.
Kadelbach and Kleinlein (2007), pp. 340–348.
- 43.
Venzke (2012), p. 25.
- 44.
Jain (2016), p. 120.
- 45.
Kelsen (1966), pp. 539–540.
- 46.
Scelle (1934), pp. 312–315; Anzilotti (1955), pp. 67 and 107–108, fn. 5, who considers the general principles of international law as a part of customary law. However, this author (pp. 106–109) also maintains that the ICJ may resort to general principles to avoid non liquet and to resolve doubtful cases.
- 47.
- 48.
Certain authors maintain that general principles are rather “material sources” and may represent the premises for the judge to deduct the rules applicable to the specific case (see Virally (1968), pp. 543–546); or material sources useful to avoid non liquet (see Weil 1992, pp. 148–149). In his Dissenting Opinion in the Right of Passage Case, Judge Fernandes affirmed “quelle que se soit la position doctrinale qu’on prenne à l’egard de ces principes, […] tout le monde est. d’accord pour accepter leur existence et leur application comme source de droit positif”; ICJ, Right of Passage over Indian Territories (Portugal v India), Judgment of 12 April 1960, ICJ Reports 1960, pp. 134–135.
- 49.
- 50.
- 51.
Abi-Saab (1987), pp. 188–189.
- 52.
See infra Sect. 3.4.7.
- 53.
- 54.
Dominicé (2013), p. 80.
- 55.
- 56.
Degan (1997), pp. 72–89. This author considers the existence of two categories of principles: those which are prerequisites to the existence of any legal system and those which are axioms of the international order.
- 57.
- 58.
Capotorti considers pacta sunt servanda as a “principe constitutif de l’ordre juridique international”. Capotorti (1994), pp. 119–127.
- 59.
Cannizzaro (2014), p. 122.
- 60.
Dupuy (2002), p. 182.
- 61.
Tomuschat (1999), p. 161.
- 62.
Tomuschat (1999), pp. 355–356.
- 63.
According to Arangio-Ruiz (1979), p. 68, principles are induced from customary rules.
- 64.
- 65.
Lammers (1980), pp. 66–69.
- 66.
Brownlie (2008), p. 19 affirms that general principles derive from customary rules or are logical propositions based on existing international law.
- 67.
Wolfrum (2011), paras. 33–39.
- 68.
Protière (2008), pp. 275–276.
- 69.
Gaja (2013), paras. 18, 31–32.
- 70.
Luzzatto (2006), pp. 66–68.
- 71.
Dupuy (2002), p. 183.
- 72.
Dominicé (2013), p. 80.
- 73.
Dominicé (2013), pp. 89–90.
- 74.
Dominicé (2013), pp. 92–93.
- 75.
Bassiouni (1990), pp. 768–769.
- 76.
Buzzini (2004), p. 607.
- 77.
See infra Sect. 3.4.7.
- 78.
Verdross (1968), p. 536.
- 79.
Lammers (1980), p. 72.
- 80.
Gaja (2013), paras. 18–20.
- 81.
Simma and Alston (1992), pp. 102–106, esp. p. 105.
- 82.
Dupuy (2002), pp. 186–187.
- 83.
Tomuschat (1999), p. 356.
- 84.
Cançado Trindade, separate opinion in the Pulp Mills case, ICJ Reports 2010, pp. 135–155, at p. 151, para. 39. However, for this scholar, these principles are at the origins of any legal system (ibidem, paras. 18 and 39).
- 85.
Henkin (1996), pp. 37–38.
- 86.
Charney (1993), pp. 543–551.
- 87.
Abi-Saab (1987), pp. 188–210.
- 88.
- 89.
- 90.
Vitanyi (1982), pp. 113–116.
- 91.
Wolfrum (2011), paras. 35–39.
- 92.
Cheng (1953), pp. 390–392.
- 93.
Lammers (1980), p. 65.
- 94.
- 95.
- 96.
Charney (1993), p. 551, although this author speaks about new “general international law” instead of general principles.
- 97.
- 98.
See, supra, Sect. 1.
- 99.
Ibid.
- 100.
ICJ, The Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v Albania) Merits, Judgment of 9 April 1949, ICJ Reports 1949, p. 4, at 22 (italics added).
- 101.
See Quadri (1968), p. 119.
- 102.
See Pisillo Mazzeschi (2007), pp. 462–468.
- 103.
Iovane (2008), p. 469.
- 104.
See, e.g., Dominicé (2013).
- 105.
- 106.
Trail Smelter (United States v Canada), Award of 11 March 1941, Arbitral Tribunal, RSA, vol. III, pp. 1905–1982.
- 107.
Corfu Channel case, see supra fn. 100.
- 108.
ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996, ICJ Reports 1996, p. 226.
- 109.
ICJ, Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia), Judgment of 25 September 1997, ICJ Reports 1997, p. 7.
- 110.
ICJ, Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), Judgment of 20 April 2010, ICJ Reports 2010, p. 425.
- 111.
Arbitration regarding the Iron Rhine (“Ijzeren Rijn”) Railway between the Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Award of 24 May 2005, RSA, vol. XXVII, pp. 35–125.
- 112.
Arbitration Lake Lanoux (France v Spain), Award of 1 November 1957, (1957) RSA, vol. XII, p. 281.
- 113.
ICJ, Case Concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso v Republic of Mali), Judgment of 22 December 1986, ICJ Reports 1986, p. 554.
- 114.
See Cassese (1984), pp. 166–168.
- 115.
See the Statement of Arvid Pardo of 1 November 1967, First Committee, UNGA, UN GAOR, 1515th and 1516th Meeting.
- 116.
With the exclusion, in our opinion, of the prohibition of massive pollution of common spaces.
- 117.
Report submitted to the UN General Assembly (A/56/10). The report, which also contains commentaries on the draft articles, appears in the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2001, vol. II, Part Two.
- 118.
Cassese (1984), p. 160.
- 119.
ICJ, Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment of 26 November 1984, ICJ Reports 1984, p. 437, spec. Para. 187.
- 120.
See supra fn 38, paras. 43 et seq. and 65 et seq.
- 121.
ICJ, Western Sahara, Advisory Opinion of 16 October 1975, ICJ Reports 1975, p. 12.
- 122.
See in this sense the 14th December 1960 GA Resolution 1514 (XV) on Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples; the 14th December 1962 Resolution on Permanent Sovereignty on Natural Resources (GA Res. 1803 (XVII), 17 UN GAOR Supp. N° 17 at 15, UN Doc. A/5217 (1962) and the 1970 Declaration on Friendly Relations and Cooperation Among States (GA Res. 2625 (XXV), UN GAOR, 25th Sess., Supp. N° 28, at 121, UN Doc. A/8028 (1970).
- 123.
ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, p. 15.
- 124.
ICJ, Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Limited (New Application, 1962), (Belgium v Spain), Merits, Second Phase, Judgment of 5 February 1970, ICJ Reports 1970, p. 3.
- 125.
ICJ, Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States v Iran), Merits, Judgment of 24 May 1980, ICJ Reports 1980, p. 3.
- 126.
- 127.
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Report), 1987.
- 128.
The Future We Want, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012, A/RES/66/288
- 129.
See also the 2002 ILA New Delhi Declaration of Principles of International Law related to Sustainable Development and the OECD Guidelines: Strategies for Sustainable Development (2001).
- 130.
WTO Appellate Body, United States Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, Decision of 12 October 1998, WT/DS58/AB/R.
- 131.
See supra fn. 111.
- 132.
ICJ, Request for an Examination of the Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court’s Judgment of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France) Case, Order of 22 September 1995, ICJ Reports 1995, paras. 34–35.
- 133.
See supra fn. 109.
- 134.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Case Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v Japan; Australia v Japan), Provisional Measures, International Order of 27 August 1999.
- 135.
WTO Appellate Body, Case EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), Decision of 16 January 1998, WT/DS26/AB/R and WT/DS48/AB/R.
- 136.
Text adopted by the International Law Commission at its 58th session, in 2006, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission’s report covering the work of that session (A/61/10), Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2006, vol. II, Part Two.
- 137.
PCA, The Rhine Chlorides Arbitration Concerning the Auditing of Accounts (The Netherlands v France), Award of 12 March 2014.
- 138.
Common Security. A Program for Disarmament. Report of the Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security Issues under the Chairmanship of O. Palme, London, Pan Books, 1982.
- 139.
The Commission on Human Security was established in January 2001 in response to the UN Secretary-General’s call at the 2000 Millennium Summit for a world “free from want” and “free from fear”. CHS: 2003: 4.
- 140.
UN General Assembly, 66th Session “Follow-up to paragraph 143 on human security of the 2005 World Summit Outcome”, A/RES/66/290 of 25 October 2012.
- 141.
Adopted by the Governing Body of the International Labour Office at its 204th Session (Geneva, November 1977) and amended at its 279th (November 2000), 295th (March 2006) and 329th (March 2017) Sessions.
References
Abi-Saab G (1987) Cours général de droit international public. RdC 207:9–464
Akehurst M (1976) Equity and general principles of law. ICLQ 25:801–825
Alexy R (1996) Theorie der Grundrechte, 3rd edn. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. (A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)
Alexy R (2000) On the structure of legal principles. Ratio Juris 13:294–304
Alexy R (2003) On balancing and subsumption: a structural analysis. Ratio Juris 16:433–449
Anzilotti D (1955) Corso di diritto internazionale, vol I. Cedam, Padova
Arangio-Ruiz G (1979) The UN declaration on friendly relations and the sources of international law. Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn
Bassiouni MC (1990) A functional approach to “general principles of international law”. Mich JIL 11:768–818
Besson S (2010) Theorizing the sources of international law. In: Besson S, Tasioulas J (eds) The philosophy of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–185
Biddulph M, Newman D (2014) A contextualized account of general principles of international law. Pace Int Law Rev 26:286–344
Boas G (2012) Public international law: contemporary principles and perspectives. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Bobbio N (1994) (1966) Principi generali di diritto. In: Bobbio N (ed) Contributi ad un dizionario giuridico. Giappichelli, Torino, pp 257–279
Bongiovanni G (2013) Il neocostituzionalismo: i temi e gli autori. In: Pino G, Schiavello A, Villa V (eds) Filosofia del diritto. Introduzione critica al pensiero giuridico e al diritto positivo. Giappichelli, Torino, pp 84–116
Brownlie I (2008) Principles of public international law, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Buzzini GP (2004) La théorie des sources face au droit international général: Réflexions sur l’émergence du droit objectif dans l’ordre juridique international. RGDIP 106:581–617
Cannizzaro E (2014) Diritto internazionale, 2nd edn. Giappichelli, Torino
Capotorti F (1994) Cours général de droit international public. RdC 248:9–344
Carreau D, Marrella F (2012) Droit international, 11th edn. Editions A. Pedone, Paris
Carrillo Salcedo JA (1997) Reflections on the existence of a hierarchy of norms in international law. EJIL 8:583–595
Cassese A (1984) Il diritto internazionale nel mondo contemporaneo. Il Mulino, Bologna
Cassese A (2005) International law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Charney JI (1993) Universal international law. AJIL 87:529–551
Cheng B (1953) General principles of law, as applied by international courts and tribunals. Reprint 1987. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Conforti B (2015) Diritto internazionale, 10th edn. Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli
D’Amato A (2011) New approaches to customary international law. AJIL 105:163–167
de Visscher C (1933) Contribution à l’étude des sources du droit international. Rev Dr Int Lég Comp:395–420
de Visscher C (1953) Théorie et réalités en droit international public. Pedone, Paris
Degan VD (1997) Sources of international law. Nijhoff, The Hague
Dominicé C (2013) La société internationale à la recherche de son équilibre, Cours Général de Droit International Public. RdC 370:9–392
Dupuy PM (2002) L’unité de l’ordre juridique international, Cours Général de droit international public. RdC 297:9–490
Dworkin R (1967) The model of rules. Univ Chic Law Rev 35:14–46
Dworkin R (1978) Taking rights seriously. New impression with a reply to critics. Duckworth, London
Dworkin R (1986) Law’s empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)
Ellis J (2011) General principles and comparative law. EJIL 22:949–971
Fitzmaurice G (1958) Some problems regarding the formal sources of international law. In: van Asbeck FM et al (eds) Symbolae Verzijl. Nijhoff, La Haye, pp 153–176
Focarelli C (2012) Diritto internazionale. Giuffrè Editore, Milano
Friedmann W (1963) The uses of “general principles” in the development of international law. AJIL 57:279–299
Gaja G (2013) ‘General principles of law’, Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law, online edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Guastini R (1993) Le fonti del diritto e l’interpretazione. Giuffrè Editore, Milano
Gutteridge HC (1953) The meaning and the scope of article 38 (1) (c) of the statute of the International Court of Justice. Trans Grotius Soc 38:125–150
Härle E (1935) Les principes généraux de droit et le droit des gens. RDILC 16:663–687
Hart HLA (1994) The concept of the law (1961), 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Henkin L (1995-96) Human rights and state sovereignty. Ga J Int Comp Law 25:31–45
Iovane M (2008) La participation de la societé civile à l’élaboration et à l’application du droit international de l’environnement. RGDIP 3:465–520
Jain N (2016) Judicial lawmaking and general principles in international criminal law. HILJ 57:111–150
Jennings RY (1998) What is international law and how do we tell it when we see it? In collected writings of sir Robert Jennings, vol 2. Kluwer, The Hague
Kadelbach S, Kleinlein T (2007) International law a constitution for mankind? An attempt at a re-appraisal with an analysis of constitutional principles. GYIL 50:303–348
Kelsen H (1966) Principles of international law, 2nd edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
Lammers JG (1980) General principles of law recognized by civilized nations. In: Kalshoven FP, Kuyper J, Lammers JG (eds) Essays on the development of the international legal order. Kluwer, Alpen aan den Rijn, pp 53–75
Lauterpacht H (1927) Private law sources and analogies in international law: with special reference to international arbitration. Longmans Green and Co. Ltd, London
Luzzatto R (2006) Il diritto internazionale generale e le sue fonti. In: Carbone SM, Luzzatto R, Santa Maria A (eds) Istituzioni di diritto internazionale, 3rd edn. Giappichelli, Torino
MacCormick N (1978) Legal reasoning and legal theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
McNair AD (1957) The general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. BYIL 33:1–19
Meron T (2003) International law in the age of human rights. General course of public international law. RdC 301:9–490
Meron T (2006) The humanization of international law. Martinus-Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston
Minda G (1995) Postmodern legal movements. Law and jurisprudence at Century’s end. New York University Press, New York
Mosler H (1984) General principles of law. Encyclopedia Public Int Law 7:511–526
Nino CS (1996) Introduzione all’analisi del diritto (1980). Giappichelli, Torino
Pino G (2016) Teoria analitica del diritto I. La norma giuridica. Edizioni ETS, Pisa
Pisillo Mazzeschi R (2007) Diritto internazionale. In: Mazzeschi F-G-P (ed) Diritti umani- Dizionario, vol I. UTET, Torino, pp 462–468
Pisillo Mazzeschi R (2008) Responsabilité de l’Etat pour violation des obligations positives relatives aux droits de l’homme. RdC 333:175–506
Pisillo Mazzeschi R (2014) Human rights and the modernization of international law. In: Lenzerini F, Vrdoljak AF (eds) International law for common goods. Normative perspectives on human rights, culture and nature. Hart, Oxford, pp 89–101
Protière G (2008) Les principes généreaux dans la jurisprudence internationale: éléments d’une différenciation fonctionnelle. Revue du Droit Public et de la Science Politique en France et à l’Étranger:259–292
Quadri R (1968) Diritto internazionale pubblico, 5th edn. Liguori, Napoli
Rawls J (1972) A theory of justice (1971). Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Raz J (1972) Legal principles and the limits of law. Yale LJ 81:823–854
Salerno F (1996) Principi generali di diritto (Diritto internazionale). Digesto delle discipline pubblicistiche XI:524–557
Scelle G (1934) Précis de Droit des Gens. Principes et systématique. Deuxième partie. Recueil Sirey, Paris
Schachter O (1991) International law in theory and practice. Martinus-Nijhoff, Dordrecht
Schlesinger RB (1957) Research on the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. AJIL 51:734–753
Schwarzenberger G (1955) The fundamental principles of international law. RdC 87:195–383
Sicilianos LA (2012) L’influence des droits de l’homme sur la structure du droit international. RGDIP 116:241–274
Simma B (1994) From bilateralism to community interest in international law. RdC 250:217–384
Simma B, Alston P (1992) The sources of human rights law: custom, jus cogens and general principles. AYIL 12:82–108
Sørensen M (1960) Les principes de droit international public. Cours général de droit international. RdC 101:1–254
Stone J (1981) From principles to principles. Law Q Rev 97:224–253
Thirlway H (2010) The sources of international law. In: Evans MD (ed) International law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 187–203
Tomuschat C (1993) Obligations arising for states without or against their will. RdC 241:195–374
Tomuschat C (1999) International law: ensuring the survival of mankind on the eve of a new century. General course on public international law. RdC 281:9–438
Treves T (2005) Diritto internazionale. Problemi fondamentali. Giuffrè, Milano
Tunkin G (1975) International law in the international system. RdC 147:1–218
Venzke I (2012) How interpretation makes international law: on semantic change and normative twists. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Verdross A (1968) Les principes généraux de droit dans le système des sources du droit international public. In: Guggeheim P (ed) Receuil d’études de droit international en hommage à P. Guggenheim. En vente à la Librairie de l'Université, Georg, Geneva, pp 521–530
Virally M (1968) Le role des «principes» dans le development du droit international. In: Guggeheim P (ed) Recueil des Etudes de droit international en hommage à P. Guggenheim. En vente à la Librairie de l'Université, Georg, Geneva, pp 531–564
Vitanyi B (1982) Les positions doctrinales concernant le sens de la notion de principes généraux du droit reconnus par les nations civilisées. RGDIP 86:48–116
Waldock H (1962) States and the law governing resort to force. General course on public international law. RdC 106:1–252
Weil P (1992) Le droit international en quête de son identité. Cours général de droit international. RdC 237:1–369
Wengler W (1964) Völkerrecht, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 361–371
Wolfrum R (2011) Sources of international law. In: Max Plank encyclopedia of public international law, online edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2015
Zagrebelski G (1992) Il diritto mite. Legge diritto giustizia. Einaudi, Torino
Further Reading
Barberis J (1991) Los Principios Generales de Derecho come Fuente del Derecho Internacional. Revista del Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos 14:11–41
Benvenuti P (2004) Principi generali di diritto, giurisdizioni internazionali e mutamenti sociali nella vita di relazione internazionale. In Studi di diritto internazionale in onore di G. Arangio-Ruiz. Giuffré, Milano, pp 295–313
Bogdan M (1977) General principles of law and the problem of lacunae in the law of nations. Nordic J Int Law 46:37–53
Bos M (1977) The recognized manifestation of international law: a new theory of sources. GYIL 20:9–76
Condorelli L (2006) Fonti (Diritto Internazionale). In: Digesto delle Discipline Pubblicistiche, III, pp 2554–2574
Crawford J (2013) General course on public international law. RdC 365:9–390
De Sena P (2016) Proportionality and human rights in international law: some … « utilitarian » reflections. RDI 99:1009–1025
Degan VD (1989) The sources of international criminal law. Chinese JIL 4:45–83
Dupuy PM, Vinuales JE (2015) International environmental law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dworkin R (1990) Questioni di principio. Il saggiatore, Milano
Fauvre (1974) Principes de droit des gens. Editions Universitaires, Fribourg
Fitzmaurice G (1953) The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951-54. General principles and sources of law. BYIL 30:1–70
Fitzmaurice G (1957) General principles of international law considered from the standing point of the rule of law. RdC 92:1–228
Fitzmaurice G (1959) The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice 1954–59. General principles and sources of law. BYIL 35:183–231
Flauss JF (1998) La protection internationale des droits de l’homme et les sources du droit international. Rapport general. In: La protection internationale des droits de l’homme et l’évolution du droit international, SFDI Colloque de Strasbourg
Heilborn P (1926) Les sources du droit international. RdC 11:1–64
Herczegh G (1969) General principles of law and the international legal order. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest
Kirgis FL (1987) Custom on a sliding scale. AJIL 81:146–151
Kolb R (1999) La Bonne Foie en Droit International Public: Contribution à l’Etude des Principes Généraux de Droit, PhD diss. Université de Genève, Genève
Kolb R (2001) La structure constitutionnelle du droit international public. CanYIL 39:69–115
Kolb R (2006) Principles as sources of international law (with special reference to good faith). NILR 53:1–36
Koskenniemi M (2000) General principles: reflections on constructivist thinking in international law. In: Koskenniemi M (ed) Sources of international law. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 359–399
Lauterpacht H (1933) The function of law in the international community. Clarendon, Oxford
Lauterpacht H (1958) The development of international law by the international court. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nino CS (1980) Dworkin and the legal positivism. Mind 89:519–543
Olufemi E, Chin L (1997) “General principles of law”, “soft law” and the identification of international law. NYIL 38:3–49
Pellet A (1974) Recherche sur les Principes Généraux de Droit en Droit International. PhD diss., Université de Paris
Pellet A (2006) Article 38. In: Zimmerman A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K (eds) The statute of the International Court of Justice: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 677–792
Raimondo FO (2008) General principles of law in the decisions of international criminal courts and tribunals. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston
Rousseau C (1970) Droit international public. Sirey, Paris
Simma B, Paulus A (1999) The responsibility of individuals for human rights abuses in internal conflicts: a positivist view. AJIL 93:302–316
Sørensen M (1946) Les sources du droit international. Etude sur la jurisprudence de la Cour Permanente de Justice Internationale. Einar Munksgaard, Copenhague
Sur S (2014) La créativité du droit international. Collect Courses The Hague Acad Int Law 363:9–332
Tomuschat C (2014) Human rights. Between idealism and realism, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Van Hoof GJH (1983) Rethinking the sources of international law. Kluwer, Deventer
Verdross A (1935) Les principes généraux du droit dans la jurisprudence international. RdC 52:191–251
de Visscher P (1972) Cours général de droit international public. RdC 136:1–202
Weil P (1983) Towards relative normativity in international law. CJTL 77:413–442
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pisillo Mazzeschi, R., Viviani, A. (2018). General Principles of International Law: From Rules to Values?. In: Pisillo Mazzeschi, R., De Sena, P. (eds) Global Justice, Human Rights and the Modernization of International Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90227-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90227-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90226-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90227-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)