Abstract
Roots and leaves comprise two of the largest microbial habitats on Earth, particularly in tropical forests where root and leaf surface areas are extremely high and microbes are abundant and diverse. Fungal and bacterial endophytes are primarily acquired via contagious spread from the surrounding environment. The soil is an important reservoir for both fungal and bacterial endophytes; we term this a soil microbial bank and suggest that it functions similarly to a soil seed bank. Because most (~75%) studies have found a strong positive relationship between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity, we predict that as plant diversity increases so will endophyte taxonomic and functional diversity. Once inside plant host tissues, endophytes can act as mutualists and increase plant performance directly by producing plant hormones, or indirectly by decreasing fungal or insect damage by up to 80%. Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that there are costs associated with hosting “beneficial” endophytes for tropical trees. This is important because it challenges more traditional dichotomies (e.g., beneficial or deleterious) about endophytes and suggests that there are highly complex and context-dependent trade-offs and costs involved in plant-endophyte interactions. Though they comprise a cryptic component of tropical forests, plant-microbe interactions may typically regulate tree diversity, composition, and forest function at neighborhood and even regional scales. For example, pathogens may maintain tree diversity by reducing the fitness of common species in areas where plant host density is high or where hosts are close to reproductive conspecific adults. Moreover, plant-endophyte interactions, whether pathogenic or mutualistic, may comprise an entirely novel dimension of niche differentiation for coexisting tree species. Overall, tree endophytes in tropical forests are complex, yet critical drivers of forest dynamics and function.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
Together, plant roots and leaves comprise two of the world’s largest microbial habitats, yet we know little about the microbes that occur in these habitats, particularly in tropical forests (Curl and Truelove 2012; Griffin and Carson 2015). Indeed, the global root area is over 100 million km2 and the global leaf area is over 1 billion km2, which alone is more than double the earth’s land surface area (Jackson et al. 1997; Vorholt 2012). Moreover, microbial endophytes have been isolated from every plant species studied to date, which includes species from tundra to deserts, agricultural systems, and tropical rainforests (Stone et al. 2000; Strobel et al. 2004; Rodriguez et al. 2009; Aly et al. 2010; Strobel 2012). The ubiquitous distribution of endophytes and their high diversity and abundance in some biomes suggest that these cryptic organisms can be powerful drivers of ecological processes. Indeed, studies have demonstrated that fungal and bacterial endophytes can increase or decrease plant performance, regulate plant diversity, and cause cascading effects up and down trophic levels (e.g., Clay and Holah 1999; Griffin et al. 2016, 2017; Laforest-Lapointe et al. 2017; reviewed by Rodriguez et al. 2009; Saikkonen et al. 2010; Griffin and Carson 2015; Hardoim et al. 2015; Brader et al. 2017). Studies to date, however, have focused primarily on grasses and agricultural crops but not trees, which store the bulk of above-ground carbon worldwide (Rudgers and Clay 2007; Hyde and Soytong 2008; Aly et al. 2010; Porras-Alfaro and Bayman 2011; but cf Zimmerman and Vitousek 2012; Griffin et al. 2016, 2017; Laforest-Lapointe et al. 2017).
In this book chapter, we review what is known about the identities, diversity, ecological origins, and impacts of bacterial and fungal endophytes on tropical tree hosts and their resident plant communities. In particular sections of this chapter where studies are numerous and bacteria and fungi are distinguishably different, we write separate sections on bacteria and fungi; otherwise, in other sections we group bacteria and fungi together. We define endophytes as bacteria or fungi that have colonized the interior portions of plant tissues (De Bary 1866; Henis and Bashan 1986; Hardoim et al. 2015; Griffin and Carson 2015). We define the endosphere as the interior portion of any plant tissue from seed to adult (Compant et al. 2010). We define operational taxonomic units (OTUs) as sequences delineated by percent DNA sequence similarity (typically 97%).
Because most endophyte studies have focused on graminoids and other herbaceous species, we use these to draw some general inferences about the identities and impacts of endophytes among tropical trees. It is important to note, however, that grass endophytes are different from tree endophytes in two major ways. First, grass endophytes are more likely to be vertically transmitted from mother to offspring via seed whereas in trees, endophytes typically accumulate horizontally via contagious spread (Arnold 2007; Rodriguez et al. 2009; Hardoim et al. 2015; Christian et al. 2017a). However, this conclusion remains tenuous because the degree to which tree bacterial endophytes are vertically or horizontally transmitted is poorly known and awaits further research (Griffin and Carson 2015; Hardoim et al. 2015; Brader et al. 2017; Frank et al. 2017; but cf Edwards et al. 2015 for horizontal transmission in rice). Moreover, grass endophytes are distantly related to tree-associated endophytes (reviewed by Rodriguez et al. 2009), which alone warrants further research. For one, phylogenetic differences among grass- and tree-associated endophytes are artifacts of host life form differences or due to geographic isolation of sites and microbial dispersal limitation. We argue that the latter might actually be more important and hypothesize that the degree of phylogenetic overlap and endophyte community similarity will increase substantially in communities where grasses are relatively depauperate and immersed within habitats dominated by woody species (e.g., forests). Nevertheless, applying any conclusions from grasses to trees has limitations.
In this chapter, our main goals are the following:
-
1.
Define microbial endophytes and discuss endophyte taxonomy with a focus on the tropical biome (Sect. 2.).
-
2.
Consider the ecological origins of microbial endophytes (Sect. 3.) and how they colonize the endosphere (Sect. 4.), with a particular focus on tropical endophytes.
-
3.
Synthesize the impacts of endophytes on host performance (Sect. 5.) and discuss the potential large-scale implications of plant-microbe interactions (Sect. 6.).
Ultimately, we argue that though they comprise a cryptic component of tropical forests, endophytes are critical in regulating tree diversity, composition and forest function.
2 What are Endophytes?
Though German botanist Heinrich Friedrich Link was the first to describe endophytes in 1809, De Bary (1866) first defined “endophyte” as “any organism occurring within plant tissues.” Since then, however, many definitions for “endophyte” have been used (reviewed by Schulz and Coyne 2006; Griffin and Carson 2015; Hardoim et al. 2015). In fact, multiple definitions of the word “endophyte” are likely used among chapters in this book. In the last 25 years, the most commonly used definition is from Petrini (1991), who defined endophytes as “all organisms inhabiting plant organs that at some time in their life, can colonize internal plant tissues without causing apparent harm to the host.” We point out two serious problems with this definition. First, microbes reside along a “continuum of infection patterns” (Wilson 1995) whereby a microbe can function as a mutualist, pathogen, or commensal depending on the virulence of the microbe, host defense responses, and environmental conditions (e.g., water availability, light availability, etc.; Johnson et al. 1997; Saikkonen et al. 1998; Schulz and Boyle 2005; Kogel et al. 2006; Johnson and Graham 2013; Mandyam et al. 2014). Thus, under Petrini’s definition, some endophytes would be defined as beneficial or benign when in fact they can become pathogenic (Schulz and Coyne 2006). Moreover, endophytic pathogens can reside within plant tissues but show no signs of infection, yet these microbes can still cause significant decreases in host performance (e.g., Bashan and Okon 1981; Newsham et al. 1994; Malcolm et al. 2013). Bashan and Okon (1981) provided a striking demonstration of this when they found that tomato plants grown in soil inoculated with the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae (Gammaproteobacteria) were morphologically symptomless but produced 30% less foliage than plants in sterile soil. Thus, defining endophytes strictly as beneficial or benign and thereby excluding pathogens from this definition is no longer tenable. The second problem with categorizing endophytes by function is that culture-based methods, which retrieve as little as 0.1–10% of entire microbial communities, and subsequent inoculation experiments of particular strains must be performed to assess microbial functionality (Amman et al. 1995). Thus, using a functionally-based definition of endophyte (e.g., not pathogenic) may be unwise because currently it is virtually impossible to characterize the functionality of the large majority of endophytes. For these reasons, we feel that the most parsimonious definition provided by De Bary (1866) is best; specifically, an endophyte is any microbe that occurs within plant tissue (Henis and Bashan 1986; Hardoim et al. 2015; Griffin and Carson 2015; Christian et al. 2017a).
Currently, the total number of identified plant fungal endophyte sequences outnumbers bacterial endophytes. To date, over 8,000 fungal endophytes have been identified and placed within 4 phyla, Ascomycota (31%), Basidiomycota (20%), Glomeromycota (40%), and Zygomycota (0.06%; almost 9% are unidentified; see Table 2 in Hardoim et al. 2015). Fungal endophytes have been placed within 20 classes, 39% are Glomeromycetes (Glomeromycota), 19% are Agaricomycetes (Basidiomycota), and 15 and 9% are in Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes, respectively (Ascomycota). Comparatively, over 7,000 bacterial endophytes have been identified in 23 phyla, 21 in the Bacterial Kingdom (99% of all sequences) and 2 in Archaea (1%). Eighty-one percent of all bacterial endophytes lie within 3 phyla, Actinobacteria (20%), Firmicutes (17%), and Proteobacteria (44%; see Table 1 in Hardoim et al. 2015). How broadly these relative percentages apply is unclear because endophytes have been primarily studied among temperate crop species and have only been characterized in a few wild gymnosperms and angiosperms (see reviews from Arnold 2007; Arnold 2008; Berg 2009; Rodriguez et al. 2009; Compant et al. 2010; Hardoim et al. 2015; Brader et al. 2017). Clearly, fungal and bacterial endophytes are diverse, yet even basic surveys of their distribution and abundance among tropical trees remain to be done.
2.1 Tree Endophytes in Tropical Forests
While it is likely that microbial endophytes are more diverse in tropical forests than temperate forests, most studies to date have used culture-dependent techniques to characterize endophyte communities among plant species. Arnold and Lutzoni (2007) demonstrated that among 22 plant species (14 tree species, 4 shrubs, 2 mosses, 1 fern and 1 liverwort), culturable fungal endophyte diversity was 24% higher among tropical than among their temperate hosts. Moreover, latitude explained almost 75% of the variation in the ratio of endophyte-infected leaves. Specifically, endophytes were isolated from 97–100% of leaves in a tropical forest in Panama compared to only 1% for the arctic site (Fig. 1). However, other culture-based studies of fungal endophyte communities reveal that fungal endophyte communities are not always highly diverse in tropical forests (e.g., Cannon and Simmons 2002; Suryanarayanan et al. 2002, 2003, 2011; Murali et al. 2006). For example, Suryanarayanan et al. (2003) found that that fungal leaf endophyte diversity among 11 tree species in a tropical forest in India was 22% lower (Fisher’s alpha diversity = 9.89) compared to Arnold and Lutzoni’s findings among trees in Panama (Fisher’s alpha = 12.65, Arnold and Lutzoni 2007). Currently, it is difficult to say anything definitive about patterns of endophyte diversity among tropical forests because of the paucity of studies and the reliance on culture-based methods.
2.1.1 Bacterial Endophytes
In the first study of foliar bacterial endophyte communities among tropical forest trees (however see Gayathri et al. 2010 and Castro et al. 2014 for mangrove trees), Griffin (2016) identified a total of more than 5200 (non-singleton) OTUs among seedlings of only five tree species, with a mean of almost 300 OTUs per individual seedling. Overall, 92% of endophytes were found within Actinobacteria (49%), Proteobacteria (32%) and Firmicutes (11%). Thus, Actinobacteria were disproportionately represented compared to bacteria found in other plant species (20%; Table 1 in Hardoim et al. 2015). The high diversity of Actinobacteria is noteworthy because these bacteria produce almost half of the world’s antimicrobial compounds (Berdy 2005; Waksman et al. 2010; Berdy 2012; see “Pathogen Protection” below). Clearly, more studies using culture-independent techniques are needed to better understand the identities and functions of endophyte communities among host species in tropical forests.
2.1.2 Fungal Endophytes
To our knowledge, Zimmerman and Vitousek (2012) conducted the first culture-independent sequencing of the foliar endophytic community of Metrosideros polymorpha (Myrtaceae), an evergreen tropical tree endemic to large islands in Hawaii. They identified a total of 2500 (non-singleton) OTUs and a mean of 341 OTUs per tree among seven sites that spanned 80 km. Overall, differences in annual precipitation (from <500 to >5,000 mm/y), elevation (100–2,400 m), and substrate (lava-flow) age (100–3,500 yr) explained over half of endophyte diversity and community composition (P < 0.01; R2 = 0.56). These findings are important because they show that endophyte communities vary drastically within a single species, over relatively short distances, and are sensitive to key substrate, resource, and elevational gradients.
Overall, Zimmerman and Vitousek (2012) identified a disproportionately large portion of sequences in Ascomycota (85%) compared to those identified to date in all other plants (~31%; Table 2 in Hardoim et al. 2015). Specifically, 73% of the Ascomycota sequences were in the class Dothideomycetes, the largest Ascomycota class and one that contains at least 18 plant pathogens (Ohm et al. 2012). Other phyla represented included Basidiomycota (0.8%) and Streptophyta (0.6%). A large percentage (40%) of the sequences, however, could not be identified in the Genbank sequence database.
3 What Structures Endophyte Communities?
3.1 Vertical Transmission: Common in Herbs But Not Trees
Despite the critical ecological importance of endophytes, we do not know whether the majority of tree-associated microbes, particularly bacteria, are transmitted from mother to offspring (i.e., vertical transmission) or via contagious spread (i.e., horizontal transmission). On one hand, microbes may be transmitted vertically via seed infections and ultimately colonize reproductive tissues after germination and transmit microbes from one generation to the next (reviewed by Griffin and Carson 2015; Truyens et al. 2015). For example, clavicipitaceous fungi (see Box 1) are a fungal class whose fungi associate with grasses as obligate symbionts, where they establish long-term associations and colonize systemically among all host tissues (reviewed by Kuldau and Bacon 2008). Moreover, these fungi are primarily vertically transmitted from mother to offspring via seed (Clay 1989; Rodriguez et al. 2009). Saikkonen et al. (2004) proposed that vertical transmission often occurs in grasses because their smaller stature and less complex architecture (relative to trees) allow for endophytes to rapidly spread throughout the plant, including reproductive tissues. Nonclavicipitaceous fungi associated with tree hosts, however, are primarily horizontally transmitted and infect host tissues more locally (Arnold 2005; Ganley and Newcome 2006; Arnold 2007; Arnold 2008; Rodriguez et al. 2009; Saikkonen et al. 2010; Sanchez-Marquez et al. 2012; Hodgson et al. 2014; Christian et al. 2015). Indeed, results to date suggest that tree endophytes do not commonly colonize seeds vertically from the mother plant. For example, Ganley and Newcombe (2006) found that only 16 of 800 seeds (2%) of Pinus monticola, a species native to the western U.S., contained fungal endophytes. In addition, Zalamea et al. (2015) recently demonstrated that only 0–4% of fresh seeds from 4 tropical tree species native to Panama were infected with bacteria and only 2–10% were infected with fungi. The identities of fungal and bacterial isolates were not characterized. Because of such low seed infection ratios, it appears that vertical transmission of endophytes is far less common than horizontal transmission. Though numerous studies have demonstrated that tropical tree endophytes provide many benefits to plant hosts, pathogenic fungi are particularly prominent and destructive in tropical forests (see “The impacts of microbial endophytes on plant hosts” and “Pathogens” sections below). Moreover, Mejia et al. (2014) recently demonstrated clear costs associated with hosting beneficial endophytes for the tropical tree Theobroma cacao (Malvaceae); these included decreased nitrogen metabolism and a substantial reduction in photosynthesis (33%). This finding, if common, is important because endophytes that provide some benefit to their hosts may typically come at a cost in terms of plant metabolism. Thus, the degree of benefit of the endophyte may vary strongly with host condition and resource availability, making it even more difficult to identify endophytes as beneficial or harmful because of a high degree of context-dependency.
Box 1. Classification of Endophytic Fungi
Rodriguez et al. (2009) divided fungal endophytes into different classes based upon the method and location of host colonization. Class I, the clavicipitaceous fungi (Hypocreales; Ascomycota), are those associated with grasses and are primarily vertically transmitted from mother to offspring via seed. Class II endophytes are classified in the Dikarya subkingdom and are primarily in the two divisions Ascomycota or Basidiomycota. Class II endophytes colonize roots and leaves via seed coats and rhizomes and may be either vertically or horizontally transmitted. Class III endophytes are also almost exclusively classified in Ascomycota or Basidiomycota and are those primarily found among trees. Moreover, Class III endophytes colonize above-ground plant tissues via horizontal transmission and have high diversity compared to all other classes. Finally, Class IV endophytes are dark, septate endophytes and restricted to roots, where they reside inter- or intra-cellularly in the cortical cell layers. Here, we primarily focus on Class III endophytes because these are the tree-associated endophytes and are particularly common in tropical forests (e.g., Lodge et al. 1996; Frohlich and Hyde 1999; Arnold et al. 2000; Gamboa and Bayman 2001; Arnold and Herre 2003; Arnold et al. 2003; Gamboa et al. 2003; Arnold and Lutzoni 2007; Higgins et al. 2007; Arnold 2008; Zimmerman and Vitousek 2012).
3.2 Horizontal Transmission
3.2.1 Endophyte Colonization of Roots
Soil is a key reservoir for microbial endophytes in tropical forests and represents a soil microbial bank similar to a soil seed bank. A single gram of soil can host up to 10,000 fungal cells and hundreds of fungal species (Buee et al. 2009; Fierer et al. 2007a; Rousk et al. 2010). Comparatively, a gram of soil hosts up to one billion bacterial cells and thousands of bacterial species (Whitman et al. 1998; Torsvik et al. 2002; Gans et al. 2005; Schloss and Handelsman 2006; Fierer et al. 2007a, b; Rousk et al. 2010). Moreover, viable microbial cells may persist for decades or even longer in soil where at any time 50–80% of microbial cells are dormant (reviewed by Lennon and Jones 2011). Thus, soil microbes may commonly use a bet-hedging strategy where they do not colonize plant hosts until environmental conditions are favorable.
Bacteria and fungi can colonize seeds in the soil before germination or be mechanically chauffeured from the soil onto the developing seedling during germination (reviewed by Griffin and Carson 2015; Llado et al. 2017). For example, Zalamea et al. (2015) found that prior to germination, fungal infection of the interior of surface-sterilized seeds increased from ~4–15% and bacterial infection increased from ~2–50% after only a single month in situ in a tropical forest in Panama. Thus, it appears that the soil microbial bank is likely critical to understanding seed and seedling colonization.
The roots of seedlings, saplings, and adults produce root exudates composed of carbohydrates, amino acids, and organic acids that recruit fungal and microbial endophytes (Phillips et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2016). In fact, up to 40% of newly photosynthesized C among non-legume temperate crops and trees can be in the form of root exudates which function to recruit mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria (reviewed by Kuzyakov and Domanski 2000; Werth and Kuzyakov 2010). This is likely a major cost to plants and suggests just how critical these endophytes are for plant hosts.
3.2.2 The Plant Diversity-Soil Organic Heterogeneity Hypothesis
Though the impacts of plant diversity on ecosystem function and trophic interactions are well documented (recent reviews by Tilman et al. 2014; Lefcheck et al. 2015; Oliver et al. 2015; Schleuning et al. 2015; Tilman 2016; Duffy et al. 2017), to our knowledge the degree to which plant diversity structures endophyte communities has never been considered. Hooper et al. (2000) and Waldrop et al. (2006) proposed that increased plant diversity increases the range of organic substrates entering the soil, thus creating more niche space that can accommodate a greater diversity of soil microbes. We term this the plant diversity-soil organic heterogeneity hypothesis to distinguish this from other plant diversity hypotheses. Indeed, 72% of observational or experimental studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity, and this result is consistent with free-living soil microbes, root-associated microbes (e.g., AM and EM fungi), and phyllosphere bacteria (Table 1). However, most of these studies (over 70%) have been conducted in grasslands, agricultural fields, or in the greenhouse. Only 7 studies (14%) were conducted in tropical forests, where all but one (Schappe et al. 2017) showed a positive relationship between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity. To our knowledge, the relationship between plant diversity and bacterial endophytes has never been evaluated. Still, it is likely that the soils of hyper-diverse tropical forests host more diverse pools of microbes and these soils are a major reservoir of plant endophytes (but cf Fierer and Jackson 2006).
3.2.3 Endophyte Colonization of Seedlings
Endophytes primarily colonize tropical tree seedlings via contagious spread (e.g., horizontal transmission; Arnold and Lutzoni 2007) and gain access to the leaf interior via a few key mechanisms. Indeed, as many as 36,000 fungal spores per day colonize endophyte-free tropical tree seedlings transplanted into the field (Arnold and Herre 2003; Gilbert and Reynolds 2005). The sources of these spores remain poorly understood and we have no data regarding the rates of bacterial colonization; however, this may well exceed rates of fungal colonization. Water and animal vectors (particularly insects) spread fungi and bacteria among tropical trees (reviewed by Griffin and Carson 2015). For example, wind and rain caused by hurricanes are the primary mechanisms for dispersal of Xanthomonas axonopodis (Gammaproteobacteria), the bacterial pathogen that colonizes leaves and causes citrus canker disease (Gottwald et al. 2002; Graham et al. 2004; Irey et al. 2006). In fact, X. axonopodis dispersed at least 50 km, and likely much further, to cause new outbreaks citrus canker following a hurricane in Florida (Irey et al. 2006; Gottwald and Irey 2007). Finally, insect vectors in tropical forests, which are orders of magnitudes more abundant and diverse compared to temperate systems, may disperse endophytes at small scales among plant hosts or potentially up to thousands of miles via migration (May 1988, 1990; Brown and Hovmoller 2002; Hamilton et al. 2010; Chapman et al. 2015; Stork et al. 2015). Indeed, 24 different xylem-feeding insect species (Hemiptera) vector (in their foregut) the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa (Gammaproteobacteria), which causes disease among temperate and tropical tree species (Purcell et al. 1979; Krugner et al. 2000; Redak et al. 2004; Azevedo et al. 2016; Lopes et al. 2016). One of the diseases caused by Xylella fastidiosa is citrus variegated chlorosis (CVC), which causes $120 million in losses per year in Latin American (Bove and Ayres 2007; Lopes et al. 2016). Moreover, larger insects, particularly in the orders Orthoptera and Lepidoptera, undertake seasonal movements of more than a thousand miles (reviewed by Chapman et al. 2015). It is likely that these insects spread bacteria and fungi among plant species during these migrations, but data are non-existent.
4 Reaching the Endosphere
4.1 Bacteria
Bacterial endophytes may colonize root and leaf tissue, where they can then act as mutualists or pathogens. As stated above, trees may recruit beneficial bacterial endophytes by producing root exudates, though both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria colonize root interiors via cracks in lateral root junctions, wounds, and root hairs (Sorensen and Sessitsch 2007; Hardoim et al. 2008; Mercado-Blanco and Prieto 2012). For example, rhizobial bacteria, which are more abundant in tropical soils compared to temperate soils, use a complex system of signal exchanges with plant hosts to enter roots via hairs or lateral root cracks (Hedin et al. 2009; Gourion et al. 2015; Pajares and Bohannan 2016). Similarly, bacteria on the leaf surface enter leaves at leaf openings such as trichome bases, stomata, or wounds created by insects (Beattie and Lindow 1995; Agrios 2005; reviewed by Griffin and Carson 2015). Pathogenic bacteria in particular gain access to leaf interiors with sophisticated and highly evolved secretion systems to bypass or suppress plant immunity (see “Pathogens” section). For example, P. syringae (Gammaproteobacteria), the most well-studied plant pathogen in the world, produces coronatine and syringolin to suppress host immunity to pathogens and induces stomatal opening, enabling bacteria to access the apoplast (Zhao et al. 2003; Melotto et al. 2006, 2008; Schellenberg et al. 2010). Because bacterial pathogens typically have secretion systems that deliver dozens of proteins into plant host cells, we predict that this is a common conduit by which bacteria invade host cells. Once inside a host, conditions are typically much better for bacterial growth, reproduction, and proliferation (Beattie and Lindow 1995, 1999; Lindow and Brandl 2003).
4.2 Fungi
While grass-associated clavicipitaceous fungal endophytes (Class I, see Box 1) typically colonize the entire host plant systemically via vertical transmission (e.g., seed), tree-associated fungi (Classes II and III, see Box 1) typically colonize roots and leaves via horizontal transmission. Fungi can directly enter roots or leaves via plant epidermal cells by extending hyphae on top of, between, or through plant cells (Jones and Dangl 2006; Rodriguez et al. 2009). Like bacteria, openings in leaves (e.g., stomates) or roots (e.g., root hairs) may facilitate fungal invasion (e.g., Arnold and Herre 2003; Agrios 2005). In addition, fungi evade or manipulate plant host chemical pathways to gain entry (Van Bael et al. 2017). Lastly, damage caused by leaf-chewing insects may provide a conduit for fungi to enter leaves. For example, Arnold (2008) demonstrated that foliar damage caused by hesperlid larvae almost doubled endophyte infection among leaves of the tree Gustavia superba in a Panamanian forest. Ultimately, once inside the leaf, fungal hyphae typically grow into the intercellular spaces of the mesophyll or the apoplast where they function as mutualists or pathogens (Giraldo and Valent 2013).
5 The Impacts of Microbial Endophytes on Plant Hosts
5.1 Beneficial Endophytes
5.1.1 Plant Growth Promotion
A diverse array of endophytes, typically root-associated bacteria, commonly fix nitrogen and synthesize plant hormones that stimulate plant growth, reproduction, and tissue differentiation (recently reviewed by Denance et al. 2013; Gaiero et al. 2013; Brader et al. 2014; Santoyo et al. 2016). Rhizobia (Alphaproteobacteria) and actinorhizal bacteria (Actinomycetales) occupy root nodules of leguminous trees (Fabaceae), which are relatively abundant in tropical forests, and fix nitrogen for hosts in exchange for carbon (Gentry 1988; Hedin et al. 2009; Vitousek et al. 2013). Several other bacterial root endophytes—primarily Proteobacteria and Firmicutes—also fix nitrogen, though the degree to which plants tap this source of N is unknown (e.g., Baldani et al. 1997; Reinhold-Hurek and Hurek 1998; Dalla Santa et al. 2004). In recent studies of two temperate conifer species (using high throughput sequencing), Carrell and Frank (2014, 2015) discovered that up to half of conifer needle endophytes were nitrogen-fixing bacteria. In another study, Moyes et al. (2016) detected significant nitrogenase (the enzyme which fixes nitrogen) activity among bacterial endophytes in Pinus flexilis needles, and moreover this nitrogen readily diffused into needles. Though foliar endophytes likely fix less nitrogen compared to rhizobial bacteria in root nodules, it may ultimately be more cost-effective for plants to support foliar nitrogen fixers compared to root nodule bacteria which are costly (reviewed by Vitousek et al. 2013). In addition to fixing nitrogen, it is common for plant-associated bacteria and fungi to function as mutualists and produce plant hormones such as gibberellins, cytokinins, and auxins that stimulate root and leaf growth and aid in wound repair (e.g., Lindow et al. 1998; Robinson et al. 1998; Gutierrez-Manero et al. 2001; Maor et al. 2004; Bhore et al. 2010; reviewed by Strack et al. 2003; Spaepen et al. 2007). In fact, over 80% of root bacterial endophytes produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), an auxin that stimulates plant tissue differentiation thereby indirectly increasing plant growth (Ramos Solano et al. 2008; Davies 2010). IAA producing-endophytes are phylogenetically widespread among at least 3 phyla of bacteria as well as 3 phyla of fungi, all of which have been isolated from tropical trees (Schmelz et al. 2003; Yang et al. 2006; Spaepen et al. 2007; Bajo et al. 2008; Rodriguez et al. 2009; Davies 2010; Hoffman et al. 2013; Griffin and Carson 2015). Thus, it is likely that tree endophytes in tropical forests commonly fix nitrogen and produce hormones for their plant hosts. Alternatively, however, if these hormones stimulate plant tissue differentiation in times of stress or when resources are low, these hormones may be, to some degree, deleterious.
5.1.2 Pathogen Protection
-
i.
Bacteria
Bacterial endophytes protect plant hosts from bacterial and fungal pathogens primarily by competitive exclusion and antimicrobial production. Endophytes typically occupy an ecological niche similar to pathogens, and early studies hypothesized that endophytes decreased pathogen abundance via competitive exclusion (reviewed by Hallmann et al. 1997). In this case, competition may occur simply via priority effects whereby benign or beneficial pathogens arrive at and occupy niche space, making it unavailable for pathogens (e.g., Wilson and Lindow 1994; Ji and Wilson 2002; Innerebner et al. 2011). In addition, more recent studies have demonstrated that endophytes synthesize secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, terpenoids, and xanthones, which inhibit pathogen growth and persistence (reviewed by Strobel et al. 2004; Brader et al. 2014; Nisa et al. 2015). Actinomycetes, which comprise ~20% of all endophytes identified to date, alone synthesize almost half of the world’s known antimicrobial compounds (Berdy 2005; Waksman et al. 2010; Berdy 2012; Hardoim et al. 2015). In a recent study across five species of tropical tree seedlings, Griffin (2016) demonstrated that nearly half of all foliar endophytes were actinomycetes. Though speculative, we suggest that a critical function of endophytic actinomycetes is a key mutualism whereby they provide antimicrobial agents in exchange for shelter, carbon, or other nutrients from their plant hosts. This is functionally analogous to how Myrmecophytic plants provide domatia and extrafloral nectaries for their ant mutualists in exchange for protection from herbivores (Janzen 1966; Gaume et al. 1998; Heil and McKey 2003). We hypothesize that this is common function of Actinomycetes and their host trees for numerous tree species in tropical forests.
-
ii.
Fungi
Fungal endophytes also competitively exclude pathogens and produce an array of secondary metabolites and antimicrobial compounds that likely offer some degree of protection from fungal and bacterial pathogens. In greenhouse and field experiments in Panama, Colletotrichum tropicale (Sordariomycetes), the dominant foliar endophyte among at least 10 tropical tree species, reduced pathogen damage among T. cacao seedlings by 10–80% compared to endophyte-free controls (Arnold et al. 2003; Hyde et al. 2009; Rojas et al. 2010; Cannon et al. 2012; Christian et al. 2017b). The mechanisms by which C. tropicale decreased pathogen damage were not evaluated. In another study, Mejia et al. (2008) demonstrated that 48% of culturable endophytes isolated from T. cacao leaves competitively excluded at least one of three dominant fungal pathogens in vitro. In addition to competitive exclusion, fungal endophytes decrease pathogen damage by producing antimicrobial compounds. Schulz et al. (2002) demonstrated that ~80% of 6,500 fungal endophytes from temperate and tropical herbaceous plants and trees synthesized antimicrobial or antifungal compounds in vitro. In all, nearly 5,000 secondary metabolites have been isolated from fungal endophytes, half of which are polyketides, but also include terpenoids, steroids, and phenols (reviewed by Gunatilaka 2006; Berdy 2012; Ludwig-Muller 2015; Nisa et al. 2015). Polyketides, in particular, include antimicrobial compounds and mycotoxins that higher plants produce to defend themselves against pathogens (Dixon 2001; Flores-Sanchez and Verpoorte 2009). Though it is clear that fungal endophytes commonly produce antimicrobial compounds, empirical studies demonstrating that these compounds are induced via endophyte-pathogen interactions are lacking. One study however used metabolomic approaches to demonstrate that a temperate pine tree endophyte, Paraconiothyrium variabile (Coelomycetes), produced metabolites to inhibit Fusarium oxysporum (Sordariomycetes) growth only after exposure to the pathogen (Combes et al. 2012).
-
iii.
Endophytes induce host resistance to pathogens
There is increasing evidence that both bacterial and fungal endophytes can trigger an immune response in host plants (induced systemic resistance) to increase host tolerance to pathogens (Bargabus et al. 2002; Bargabus et al. 2004; Tran et al. 2007; Verhagen et al. 2010; Brotman et al. 2012; Desoignies et al. 2013; Mejia et al. 2014). Endophytes may ramp up host resistance to combat future pathogen or insect attack (reviewed by Pineda et al. 2010; Zamioudis and Pieterse 2012; Bakker et al. 2013; Pieterse et al. 2014). This mutualism is particularly common among bacteria in the genera Pseudomonas (Gammaproteobacteria) and Bacillus (Bacilli), which are some of most common taxa isolated from tropical tree species (Lambais et al. 2006, 2014, 2017; Kembel et al. 2014). For example, Van Peer et al. (1991) were the first to demonstrate that root colonization by the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens enhanced carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) resistance to the fungal pathogen F. oxysporum. Since then, over 100 studies have been published that have demonstrated the ability of bacterial strains to systemically induce host resistance to pathogens in other portions of the plant (reviewed by Pieterse et al. 2014; Griffin and Carson 2015). Though not many cases of systemically induced host resistance exist for fungi, Mejia et al. (2014) recently demonstrated that colonization of the fungal endophyte Colletotrichum tropicale inside T. cacao leaves caused the up-regulation of pathogen-resistance genes. Because Colletotrichum is a dominant fungal endophyte, this phenomenon may be more common among fungal endophytes than previously thought.
5.1.3 Herbivore Protection
Endophytes commonly reduce herbivore damage by activating plant defense pathways or by altering enemy behavior. For example, tomato root inoculations with the bacterium Bacillus subtilis reduced egg masses of a root-knot nematode. These nematodes damage tomato roots and exacerbate Fusarium pathogen infection by 40–62% (Adam et al. 2014). For fungi, vertically transmitted grass endophytes decrease host susceptibility to insects and even mammalian herbivores by as much as 55% (Clay and Schardl 2002; Schardl et al. 2004; Saikkonen et al. 2010; Tanaka et al. 2012; Faeth and Saari 2012). In a meta-analysis of 99 papers, Saikkonen et al. (2010) concluded that grass endophytes typically function to deter herbivores; however, there was no overall relationship between tree endophytes and herbivore damage. More recent studies, however, have revealed that fungal endophytes can either directly decrease herbivore survival rates or indirectly decrease their fecundity, alter foraging behaviors or the gut microbiome, or even increase their susceptibility to predation (Marcelino et al. 2008; Van Bael et al. 2009; Jaber and Vidal 2010; Bittleston et al. 2011; Estrada et al. 2013; Hammer and Van Bael 2015). For example, studies of leaf-cutter ants (Atta and Acromyrmex) demonstrated that fungal endophytes alter leaf selection and ant behavior (Van Bael et al. 2012; Coblentz and Van Bael 2013; Estrada et al. 2013; Estrada et al. 2015). In a Panamanian forest, Van Bael et al. (2012) demonstrated that ants took 30–40% longer to cut, carry, and clean leaves with higher fungal endophyte abundance and diversity compared to leaves with lower abundance and diversity. Moreover, at the same site, ants selected leaves that on average hosted 20–33% fewer fungal endophytes compared to surrounding leaves (Coblentz and Van Bael 2013). These findings are important because leaf-cutter ants defoliate leaves of ~60% of woody species in Neotropical forests and cut 12–17% of the total leaf area produced by trees (Cherrett 1968; Rockwood 1976; Blanton and Ewel 1985; Holldobler and Wilson 2010). Overall, these results suggest that fungal endophytes likely regulate herbivore foraging and damage.
5.2 Pathogens
Plant pathogens gain access to host cells using highly evolved mechanisms, where they then proliferate and cause disease. Like mutualists, pathogenic bacteria can enter plant tissue through openings (e.g., stomates, trichome bases, wounds) and proliferate in intercellular spaces (reviewed by Griffin and Carson 2015). Fungal pathogens and the fungal-like protist oomycetes can enter directly via epidermal cells or through feeding structures called haustoria, which function to invaginate plant cell membranes (reviewed by Jones and Dangl 2006; Dean et al. 2012; Jiang and Tyler 2012; Pawlowski et al. 2012; Thines 2014). Both bacteria and fungi use highly adapted secretion systems to deliver effector proteins into plant cells to break down host cell walls, facilitate dispersal of microbes on and inside plant tissues, and bypass plant immune responses (Jones and Dangl 2006; Ellis et al. 2009; Stergiopoulos and de Wit 2009; Wooldridge 2009). Fungi and oomycetes can do this either in the extracellular matrix formed along epidermal cells or once inside host cells, whereas bacteria must deliver effectors inside cells (Jones and Dangl 2006). Once effectors are delivered, pathogens can feed on dead host cells (necrotrophs) or invade quickly and extract nutrients from hosts without killing them (biotrophs), however many of the most prolific pathogens can display both lifestyles (Glazebrook 2005; Jackson 2009; Dean et al. 2012; Mansfield et al. 2012). Successful pathogens are able to either suppress or evade detection and cause damage to plant tissue.
5.2.1 Bacterial Pathogens
Though the impacts of bacterial pathogens in tropical forests are not well documented, evidence from agricultural systems suggests that these organisms likely cause severe damage even in more diverse systems. Some of the most potent bacterial pathogens in the world occur in the tropics and diminish agricultural yields. For example, P. syringae has commonly been isolated from plants in Fabaceae, one of the most commonly represented families in tropical forests (Horst 1990; Sarkar and Guttman 2004; Silby et al. 2011; Morris et al. 2013; reviewed by Griffin and Carson 2015). Moreover, Xanthomonas (Gammaproteobacteria) is a largely pathogenic bacterial genus whose members reduce tropical crop yields, including banana, citrus, rice, and sugarcane, by over 50% (Biruma et al. 2007; Tripathi et al. 2009; Ryan et al. 2011). Three Xanthomonas species (X. axonopodis, X. campestris, X. oryzae) are among the top ten most “scientifically and economically important” plant pathogenic bacteria in the world. Four of the other ten, two Dickeya (Gammaproteobacteria) spp. and two Pectobacterium (Gammaproteobacteria) spp., together cause disease in half of all angiosperm plant orders (Ma et al. 2007). If endophytes are primarily pathogenic and tree host species are differentially vulnerable, then endophytes may be major agents of forest turnover particularly in small size classes and in areas around parent trees (see “The impacts of endophytes on tropical tree communities” section below).
5.2.2 Fungal Pathogens
Fungal pathogens typically lie within the phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota and cause more damage to hosts in tropical than in temperate systems. For example, seven of the top ten most “scientifically and economically important” fungal pathogens lie within Ascomycota, while the remaining three lie within Basidiomycota (Dean et al. 2012). The most destructive agricultural plant pathogen globally is the rice blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae (Sordariomycetes), which destroys enough rice to feed more than 60 million people annually (Scardaci et al. 1997). Though particular species actually function as mutualists (see above), many Colletotrichum spp. (Sordariomycetes) are particularly damaging to tropical crop species, where they can cause up to 100% mortality among banana, cassava, sorghum, and rubber trees (Prusky 1996; Cao et al. 2017). In general, pathogens in tropical systems decrease crop yields 50–100% more than temperate pathogens, and moreover outnumber temperate pathogens 10:1 (Wellman 1968; Wellman 1972; Hill and Waller 1982; Shivas and Hyde 1997; Thurston 1998; Gilbert 2005). In the first studies on plant-pathogen interactions in tropical forests, Augspurger and colleagues found that damping-off disease caused by Pythium (Oomycetes) spp. was the leading cause of seedling mortality for six of nine tree species in Panama (Augspurger 1983; Augspurger and Kelly 1984; Augspurger 1984; Kitajima and Augspurger 1989). In Neotropical forests, foliar fungal pathogens cause damage to over three-fourths of shrub and tree species, and the degree of damage ranges from 1–34% of entire leaf area (N = 78 species; Gilbert 1995; Barone 1998; Benitez-Malvido et al. 1999; Garcia-Guzman and Dirzo 2001). Indeed, even small levels of damage to tropical seedlings are not trivial, because as little as 8% of leaf damage can cause up to 100% seedling mortality (Clark and Clark 1985; reviewed by Coley and Barone 1996). Thus, fungal pathogens in tropical systems cause significant damage to plant hosts and have broad implications for plant communities at larger scales.
5.3 Endohyphal Bacteria—Good or Bad for Plant Hosts?
Recent studies have demonstrated that fungal endophytes can harbor bacteria within their hyphae, which together can increase or decrease host plant performance (Partida-Martinez and Hertweck 2005; Partida-Martinez et al. 2007a; Salvioli et al. 2010, 2016; Hoffman et al. 2013; reviewed by Bonfante and Anca 2009). Fungi that host endobacteria are phylogenetically diverse, including members of Mucoromycotina, Mortierellomycotina, Glomeromycota, Basidiomycota, and Ascomycota. Surprisingly, to date, however, endohyphal bacteria are exclusively found in Proteobacteria (Barbieri et al. 2000; Bianciotto et al. 2003; Bertaux et al. 2005; Partida-Martinez et al. 2007b; Sharma et al. 2008; Sato et al. 2010; Desiro et al. 2015). For example, the plant mutualist mycorrhiza Gigaspora margarita (Glomeromycota) harbors the bacterium Candidatus Glomeribacter gigasporarum (Betaproteobacteria) in densities of 250,000 cells per fungal spore, and when this bacterium is present it enhances fungal establishment and growth (Bianciotto et al. 1996, 2003, 2004). Conversely, the fungal root endophyte Rhizopus microsporus (Mucorales) harbors the bacterium Burkholderia rhizoxinica (Betaproteobacteria), which causes rice blast disease only when both the bacterium and fungus are present (Partida-Martinez and Hertweck 2005; Partida-Martinez et al. 2007b). In another study, Hoffman et al. (2013) demonstrated that the foliar fungal endophyte Pestalotiopsis aff. neglecta (Sordariomycetes) isolated from a temperate coniferous tree (Platycladus orientalis) produced ~ 5 times more plant hormones when its endohyphal bacterium Luteubacter (Gammaproteobacteria) spp. was also present. Moreover, P. orientalis shoot and root length increased by ~30–33% when the bacterium was present inside the fungal endophyte. Though studies have been limited in scope, multi-trophic interactions among fungi, bacteria, and plant hosts are likely common among higher plants. For example, Shaffer et al. (2016) recently found that 75% of seed and foliar fungal endophytes hosted at least one endohyphal bacterium among 26 tropical angiosperm species. Clearly, more studies are needed to understand the breadth and implications of these very complex microbe-microbe-plant interactions. Specifically, we propose that future studies address the prevalence and impacts of predatory bacteria (those that kill and digest other bacteria) and bacteriophages (viruses that infect bacteria) among tree-associated endophyte communities (Box 2).
Box 2. Predatory bacteria and bacteriophages: 2 new areas on the horizon
Predatory bacteria and bacteriophages are abundant organisms that occur in nature and may be critical components of plant ecology. It has been known for decades that “predatory” bacteria (e.g., Bdellovirbio, Micavibrio, Myxobacteria) kill and digest other gram-negative bacteria (reviewed by Negus et al. 2017). Specifically, Bdellovibrio (Deltaproteobacteria) bacteria colonize the space between the cytoplasmic membrane and outer membrane (periplasm), where they feed on the host cell’s proteins and nucleic acids and ultimately kill host cells from the inside out (Sockett 2009). Micavibrio (Alphaproteobacteria) bacteria attach to the exterior of a prey bacterium and remain attached as they divide, eventually draining their host to death (a.k.a. the “vampire” bacteria). Myxobacteria (Deltaproteobacteria) hunt other bacteria as social swarms, releasing enzymes into the environment to digest their prey (Velicer and Vos 2009). Though these predator-prey interactions have almost exclusively been demonstrated in water and in soil, scientists have recently suggested that predatory bacteria may be common inside mammalian hosts (Dashiff et al. 2011; Negus et al. 2017). We hypothesize that this may also commonly occur among plant hosts in tropical forests because water and soil are both major sources of plant endophytes (see “What structures endophyte communities?” above). Moreover, Alphaproteobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria are two of the most common classes on and inside leaves of tree species in Panama (Kembel et al. 2014; Griffin 2016). Perhaps even more ecologically important than predatory bacteria, bacteriophages (Greek for “eaters of bacteria”), or viruses that infect bacteria, are the most abundant organisms on Earth and are estimated to infect up to 70% of bacterial cells globally (Tortora et al. 2016; Willey et al. 2016). Though bacteriophages are of particular interest in agriculture where they can be genetically engineered to control plant bacterial pathogens (Frampton et al. 2012; Pires et al. 2016), their prevalence in more natural systems and their basic ecology remain underexplored. Knowing that the plant microbiome is a cryptic driver of plant community dynamics at large scales (see “The impacts of endophytes on tropical tree communities” section), microbe-microbe interactions (e.g., endohyphal bacteria, predator-prey bacteria, bacteriophage-bacteria) may prove to be the true drivers of plant community structure and function.
6 The Impacts of Endophytes on Tropical Tree Communities
6.1 Negative Density Dependence of Pathogens Maintains Tree Community Diversity
Specialist pathogens may act as a stabilizing force to promote and maintain plant diversity by reducing host fitness in areas close to reproductive adults or when host density is high (Gillett 1962; Janzen 1970; Connell 1971). Simply put, pathogens that are host-specific can cause a reduction in the competitive abilities of particular plant species and allow other plant species to co-occur (Janzen 1970; Connell 1971; reviewed by Carson et al. 2008). Studies demonstrating host-specificity of pathogens and frequency-dependent tree mortality have been observed numerous times in the tropics, primarily for insect pests and fungal pathogens (e.g., Mangan et al. 2010; Bagchi et al. 2014; reviewed Carson et al. 2008; Mordecai 2011; Comita et al. 2014; Sarmiento et al. 2017). Augspurger and colleagues conducted the first empirical tests of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis for pathogens and demonstrated that oomycete pathogens were host-specific and their impacts were greater in areas of higher seedling density closer to parent trees (Augspurger 1983, 1984; Kitajima and Augspurger 1989). Since these studies, numerous others have shown similar patterns among oomycetes and fungal pathogens in tropical forests (Gilbert et al. 1994; Gilbert and De Steven 1996; Gilbert et al. 2001; Gilbert and Webb 2007; Comita et al. 2010; Mangan et al. 2010; Bagchi et al. 2014). La Manna et al. (2017) recently demonstrated that negative density dependence is stronger for rare tree species in tropical forests compared to rare temperate species, which may function to maintain hyper-diversity of tropical tree communities. Not a single study, however, has determined whether this pattern exists for pathogenic bacteria. In the first study of its kind, Griffin et al. (2016) found that seedlings of three of five tree species grew up to 49% more after experimentally reducing their foliar bacteria in situ for three years in a tropical forest in Panama. These results demonstrate that the net effect of these bacteria were pathogenic (though bacterial reductions increased growth for one species). If this is true, the implications for the maintenance of species diversity in tropical forests are clear: enemies may build up around conspecifics of particular species and reduce their performance and dominance.
6.2 Endophytes Can Partition the Plant Fundamental Niche to Enhance Tree Diversity
Microbial endophytes below- and above-ground may provide an important yet cryptic dimension of niche differentiation for plant communities at large scales. Though soil resource and light gradients have been associated with species-specific trade-offs required for niche partitioning (Clark et al. 1998; Condit et al. 2000; Harms et al. 2001; reviewed by Wright 2002; Kitajima and Poorter 2008), it remains unclear how these abiotic factors facilitate the coexistence of hundreds of tree species in tropical forests (e.g., Hubbell et al. 1999; Hubbell 2001; Chave 2004; Silvertown 2004). Plant-associated microbes, however, may function as a stabilizing force to increase differences in species’ performance outcomes (i.e., niches) along gradients or among interactions with other trophic levels (e.g., Chesson 2000; Bever et al. 2010; Mordecai 2011). In this framework, such stabilizing processes cause intraspecific effects to be more negative than interspecific differences (Chesson 2000). Thus, when any single species increases in abundance, its per capita growth rate slows relative to other species, which aids in species coexistence (Chesson 2000). Recently, Griffin et al. (2016, 2017) found that foliar bacteria caused co-occurring plant species to perform quite differently within contrasting soil nutrient resource levels suggesting that the interplay between plant microbes and soil fertility can create a cryptic and fairly narrow niche early in ontogeny. Ultimately, plant-microbe interactions may more finely partition niche space among coexisting plant species and thus function to maintain plant diversity.
7 Conclusions and Future Directions
Bacterial and fungal endophytes are diverse and important drivers of plant performance and may be critical components of tropical tree community composition and structure. On one hand, endophytes may directly increase host performance by producing plant hormones or confer protection to hosts from pathogens and other enemies via competitive exclusion, metabolite production, or by inducing plant systemic resistance to enemies. On the other hand, endophytes may function as pathogens and decrease plant host performance, which may have important implications for plant communities. Recent studies have demonstrated that bacterial-fungal interactions, notably interactions between fungal endophytes and their endohyphal bacteria, can either strengthen mutualist interactions between plants and microbes or together cause disease. Thus, endophytes comprise a cryptic and complex dimension of trophic interactions within plant communities and empirical studies are needed to unravel this complexity.
Tropical endophytes should be a major research focus moving forward. Indeed, recent developments in high-throughput sequencing technologies, specifically next-generation sequencing and “-omics” approaches, have allowed us to address more questions about the complex interactions between endophytes and plant hosts. Thus, it is clear that our understanding of endophyte-host interactions, particularly among tropical trees, is still in its infancy. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that microbe-microbe interactions such as mycorrhizal fungi-endohyphal bacteria, predator-prey dynamics among bacteria, and bacteriophage-bacteria interactions are common and may ultimately be critical for endophyte community structure and function. In particular, we propose two interesting and novel areas moving forward: 1. Testing the prevalence and impacts of 1. Bacteriophages that protect plant hosts via antibiotics; and 2. Predatory bacteria that colonize plants or possibly even plant-associated bacteriophages that consume bacteria (Box 2). If these interactions are common and widespread, the interactions that occur among microbes may be key to understanding ecological processes and plant community dynamics. Recent reviews have posited that plant-associated microbes should be model systems to test important community-level ecological theories such as succession, competition, and community assembly (Meyer and Leveau 2012; Christian et al. 2015; Griffin and Carson 2015). Notable goals of future research include 1. Quantify the costs and trade-offs associated with trees hosting “beneficial” endophytes among tropical trees; 2. Evaluate the degree to which endophytes produce antimicrobial compounds and empirically determining the degree to which fungal endophytes protect tropical tree hosts via systemic induced resistance in situ; 3. Begin to empirically evaluate the ecological impacts of microbe-microbe interactions on plant host performance and ultimately plant community dynamics. Ultimately, we are just beginning to scratch the surface of our understanding of the plant microbiome, and scientists should be excited to disentangle the complexities of one of the last frontiers of biodiversity.
References
Adam M, Heuer H, Hallman J (2014) Bacterial antagonists of fungal pathogens also control root-knot nematodes by induced systemic resistance of tomato plants. PLoS ONE 9:e90402
Agrios GN (2005) Plant diseases caused by prokaryotes: bacteria and mollicutes. Plant Pathology, 5th edn. Elsevier Academic Press, New York, pp 616–704
Aly AH, Debbab A, Kjer J, Proksch P (2010) Fungal endophytes from higher plants: a prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products. Fungal Divers 41:1–16
Amman RI, Ludwig W, Sckleifer KH (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 59:143–169
Antoninka A, Wolf JE, Bowker M et al (2009) Linking above- and belowground responses to global change at community and ecosystem scales. Glob Change Biol 15:914–929
Antoninka A, Reich PB, Johnson NC (2011) Seven years of carbon dioxide enrichment, nitrogen fertilization and plant diversity influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a grassland ecosystem. New Phytol 192:200–214
Arnold AE (2005) Diversity and ecology of fungal endophytes in tropical forests. In: Current trends in mycological research. IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 49–68
Arnold AE (2007) Understanding the diversity of foliar endophytic fungi: progress, challenges, and frontiers. Fungal Biol Rev 21:51–66
Arnold AE (2008) Endophytic fungi: hidden components of tropical community ecology. In: Carson WP, Schnitzer SA (eds) Tropical forest community ecology. Wiley, Oxford, pp 254–271
Arnold AE, Herre EA (2003) Canopy cover and leaf age affect colonization by tropical fungal endophytes: ecological patterns and process in Theobroma cacao (Malvaceae). Mycologia 95:388–398
Arnold AE, Lutzoni F (2007) Diversity and host range of foliar fungal endophytes: are tropical leaves biodiversity hotspots? Ecology 88:541–549
Arnold AE, Maynard Z, Gilbert GS et al (2000) Are tropical fungal endophytes hyperdiverse? Ecol Lett 3:267–274
Arnold AE, Mejia LC, Kyllo D et al (2003) Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15649–15654
Augspurger CK (1983) Seed dispersal of the tropical tree, Platypodium elegans, and the escape of its seedlings from fungal pathogens. J Ecol 71:759–771
Augspurger CK (1984) Pathogen mortality of tropical tree seedlings: a comparative study of growth and survival. J Ecol 72:777–795
Augspurger CK, Kelly CK (1984) Pathogen mortality of tropical tree seedlings: experimental studies of the effects of dispersal distance, seedling density, and light conditions. Oecologia 61:211–217
Azevedo JL, Araujo WL, Lacava PT (2016) The diversity of citrus endophytic bacteria and their interactions with Xylella fastidiosa and host plants. Genet Mol Biol 39:476–491
Bagchi R, Gallery RE, Gripenberg S et al (2014) Pathogens and insect herbivores drive rainforest plant diversity and composition. Nature 506:85–88
Bahram M, Polme S, Koljalg U et al (2012) Regional and local patterns of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure along an altitudinal gradient in the Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran. New Phytol 193:465–473
Bajo J, Santamaria O, Diez JJ (2008) Cultural characteristics and pathogenicity of Pestalotiopsis funera on Cupressus arizonica. Forest Pathol 38:263–274
Bakker PA, Doornbos RF, Zamioudis C et al (2013) Induced systemic resistance and the rhizosphere microbiome. Plant Pathology J 29:136–143
Baldani J, Caruso L, Baldani VLD et al (1997) Recent advances in BNF with non-legume plants. Soil Biol Biochem 29:911–922
Barbieri E, Potenza L, Rossi I et al (2000) Phylogenetic characterization and in situ detection of Cytophaga-Flexibacter-Bacteroides phylogroup bacterium in Tuber borchii Vittad. Ectomycorrhizal mycelium. Appl Environ Microb 66:5035–5042
Bargabus RL, Zidack NK, Sherwood JE, Jacobsen BJ (2002) Characterization of systemic resistance in sugar beet elicited by a non-pathogenic, phyllosphere-colonizing Bacillus mycoides, biological control agent. Physiol Mol Plant P 61:289–298
Bargabus RL, Zidack NK, Sherwood JE, Jacobsen BJ (2004) Screening for the identification of potential biological control agents that induce systemic resistance in sugar beet. Biol Control 30:342–350
Barone JA (1998) Host-specificity of folivorous insects in a moist tropical forest. J Anim Ecol 67:400–409
Bashan Y, Okon Y (1981) Inhibition of seed germination and development of tomato plants in soil infested with Pseudomonas tomato. Ann Appl Biol 98:413–417
Beattie GA, Lindow SE (1995) The secret life of foliar bacterial pathogens on leaves. Annu Rev Phytopathol 33:145–172
Beattie GA, Lindow SE (1999) Bacterial colonization of leaves: a spectrum of strategies. Phytopathology 89:353–359
Benitez-Malvido J, Garcia-Guzman G, Kossmann-Ferraz ID (1999) Leaf-fungal incidence and herbivory on tree seedlings in tropical rainforest fragments: an experimental study. Biol Conserv 91:143–150
Berdy J (2005) Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot 58:1–26
Berdy J (2012) Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: where we are now and where we are heading. J Antibiot 65:385–395
Berg G (2009) Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Tech 84:11–18
Bertaux J, Schmid M, Hutzler P et al (2005) Occurrence and distribution of endobacteria in the plant-associated mycelium of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor S238N. Environ Microbiol 7:1786–1795
Bever JD, Dickie IA, Facelli E et al (2010) Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 25:468–478
Bhore SJ, Ravichanter N, Loh CY (2010) Screening of endophytic bacteria isolated from leaves of Sambung Nyawa [Gynura procumbens (Lour.) Merr.] for cytokinin-like compounds. Bioinformation 5:191–196
Bianciotto V, Bandi C, Minerdi D et al (1996) An obligately endosymbiotic mycorrhizal fungus itself harbors obligately intracellular bacteria. Appl Environ Microb 62:3005–3010
Bianciotto V, Lumini E, Bonfante P, Vandamme P (2003) ‘Candidatus Glomeribacter gigasporarum’ gen nov., sp. nov., an endosymbiont of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:121–124
Bianciotto V, Genre A, Jargeat P et al (2004) Vertical transmission of endobacteria in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita through generation of vegetative spores. Appl Environ Microb 70:3600–3608
Biruma M, Pillay M, Tripathi L et al (2007) Banana Xanthomonas wilt: a review of the disease, management strategies and future research directions. Afr J Biotechnol 6:953–962
Bittleston LS, Brockmann F, Wcislo W, Van Bael SA (2011) Endophytic fungi reduce leaf-cutting ant damage to seedlings. Biol Letters 7:30–32
Blanton CM, Ewel JJ (1985) Leaf-cutting ant herbivory in successional and agricultural tropical ecosystems. Ecology 66:861–869
Bonfante P, Anca IA (2009) Plants, mycorrhizal fungi, and bacteria: a network of interactions. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:363–383
Borstler B, Renker C, Kahmen A, Buscot F (2006) Species composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in two mountain meadows with differing management types and levels of plant biodiversity. Biol Fert Soils 42:286–298
Bove JM, Ayres AJ (2007) Etiology of three recent diseases of citrus in Sao Paulo State: sudden death, variegated chlorosis and huanglongbing. IUBMB Life 59:346–354
Brader G, Compant G, Mitter B et al (2014) Metabolic potential of endophytic bacteria. Curr Opin Biotech 27:30–37
Brader G, Compant S, Vescio K et al (2017) Ecology and genomic insights into plant-pathogenic and plant-nonpathogenic endophytes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 55:61–83
Brotman Y, Lisec J, Meret M (2012) Transcript and metabolite analysis of the Trichoderma-induced systemic resistance response to Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis thaliana. Microbiology 158:139–146
Brown JKM, Hovmoller MS (2002) Aerial dispersal of pathogens on the global and continental scales and its impact on plant disease. Science 297:537–541
Buee M, Reich M, Murat C, Morin E, Nilsson RH, Uroz S, Martin F (2009) 454 pyrosequencing analysis of forest soils reveal an unexpectedly high fungal diversity. New Phytol 184:449–456
Burrows RL, Pflegar FL (2002a) Host responses to AMP from plots differing in plant diversity. Plant Soil 240:169–180
Burrows RL, Pflegar FL (2002b) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi respond to increasing plant diversity. Can J Bot 80:120–130
Cannon PF, Simmons CM (2002) Diversity and host preference of leaf endophytic fungi in the Iwokrama Forest Reserve. Guyana, Mycologia 94:210–220
Cannon PF, Damm U, Johnston PR, Weir BS (2012) Colletotrichum- current status and future directions. Stud Mycol 73:181–213
Cao X, Xu X, Che H, West JS, Luo D (2017) Distribution and fungicide sensitivity of species complexes from rubber tree in Hainan, China. Plant Dis PDIS-03-17-0352
Carney KM, Matson PA, Bohannan JM (2004) Diversity and composition of tropical soil nitrifiers across a plant diversity gradient and among land-use types. Ecol Lett 7:684–694
Carrell AA, Frank AC (2014) Pinus flexilis and Picea engelmannii share a sample and consistent needle endophyte microbiota and a potential role in nitrogen fixation. Fron Microbiol 5:333
Carrell AA, Frank AC (2015) Bacterial endophyte communities in the foliage of coast redwood and giant sequoia. Front Microbiol 6:1008
Carson WP, Anderson J, Leigh EG Jr, Schnitzer SA (2008) Challenges associated with testing and falsifying the Janzen-Connell Hypothesis: a review and critique. In: Carson WP, Schnitzer SA (eds) Tropical forest community ecology. Wiley, Oxford, pp 210–241
Castro RA, Quecine MC, Lacava PT et al (2014) Isolation and enzyme bioprospection of endophytic bacteria associated with plants of Brazilian mangrove ecosystem. Springer Plus 3:382
Chapman JW, Reynolds DR, Wilson K (2015) Long-range seasonal migration in insects: mechanisms, evolutionary drivers and ecological consequences. Ecol Lett 18:287–302
Chave J (2004) Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:241–253
Chen X, Tang J, Fang Z, Shimizu K (2004) Effects of weed communities with various species numbers on soil features in a subtropical orchard ecosystem. Agr Ecosyst Environ 102:377–388
Cherrett JM (1968) Foraging behaviour of Atta cephalotes L. (Hymenoptera, Formicadae). J Anim Ecol 37:387–403
Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 31:343–366
Christian N, Whitaker BK, Clay K (2015) Microbiomes: unifying animal and plant systems through the lens of community ecology theory. Front Microbiol 6:1–15
Christian N, Whitaker BK, Clay K (2017a) A novel framework for decoding fungal endophyte diversity. In: Dighton J, White JF (eds) The fungal community: its organization and role in the ecosystem, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 65–78
Christian N, Herre EA, Mejia LC, Clay K (2017b) Exposure to the leaf litter microbiome of healthy adults protects seedlings from pathogen damage. Proc R Soc B 284:20170641
Chung H, Zak DR, Reich PB, Ellsworth DS (2007) Plant species richness, elevated CO2, and atmospheric nitrogen deposition alter soil microbial community composition and function. Glob Change Biol 13:980–989
Clark DB, Clark DA (1985) Seedling dynamics of a tropical tree: impacts of herbivory and meristem damage. Ecology 66:1884–1892
Clark DB, Clark DA, Read JM (1998) Edaphic variation and the mesoscale distribution of tree species in a neotropical rain forest. J Ecol 86:101–112
Clay K (1989) Clavicipitaceous endophytes of grasses: their potential as biocontrol agents. Mycol Res 92:1–12
Clay K, Holah J (1999) Fungal endophyte symbiosis and plant diversity in successional fields. Science 285:1742–1744
Clay K, Schardl C (2002) Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am Nat 160:S99–S127
Coblentz KE, Van Bael SA (2013) Field colonies of leaf-cutting ants select plant materials containing low abundances of endophytic fungi. Ecosphere 4:1–10
Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335
Combes A, Ndoye I, Bance C et al (2012) Chemical communication between the endophyte fungus Paraconiothyrium variabile and the phytopathogen Fusarium oxysporum. PLoS ONE 7:e47313
Comita LS, Muller-Landau HC, Aguilar S, Hubbell SP (2010) Asymmetric density dependence shapes species abundances in a tropical tree community. Science 329:330–332
Comita LS, Queenborough SA, Murphy SJ et al (2014) Testing predictions of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence for distance- and density-dependent seed and seedling survival. J Ecol 102:845–856
Compant S, Clement C, Sessitsch A (2010) Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 42:669–678
Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P et al (2000) Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science 288:1414–1418
Connell JH (1971) On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine nimals and in rain forest trees. In: J. den Boer P, Gradwell GR (eds) Dynamics of populations. Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 298–312
Curl EA, Truelove B (2012) The rhizosphere, 12th edn. Springer, Berlin
Dalla Santa OR, Hernandez RF, Alvarez GLM (2004) Azospirillium sp. Inoculation in wheat, barley and oats seeds greenhouse experiments. Braz Arch Biol Tech 47:843–850
Dashiff A, Junka RA, Libera M, Kadouri DE (2011) Predation of human pathogens by the predatory bacteria Micavibrio aeruginosavorus and Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. Journal of Appl Microbiol 110(2):431–444
Davies PJ (2010) Plant hormones; their nature, occurrence, and function. Springer, Dordrecht
De Bary A (1866) Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze, Flechten, und Myxomyceten. Hofmeister’s Handbook of Physiological Botany. Vol II, Engelmannm, Leipzig, Germany
Dean R, Van Kan JA, Pretorius ZA et al (2012) The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13:414–430
Denance N, Sanchez-Vallet A, Goffner D, Molina A (2013) Disease resistance or growth: the role of plant hormones in balancing immune responses and fitness costs. Front Plant Sci 4:155
Desiro A, Faccio A, Kaech A et al (2015) Endogone, one of the oldest plant-associated fungi, host unique Mollicutes-related endobacteria. New Phytol 205:1464–1472
Desoignies N, Schramme F, Ongena M, Legreve A (2013) Systemic resistance induced by Bacillus lipopeptides in Beta vulgaris reduces infection by the Rhizomania disease vector Polymyxa betae. Mol Plant Pathol 14:416–421
Dixon RA (2001) Natural products and plant disease resistance. Nature 411:843–847
Duffy JE, Godwin CM, Cardinale BJ (2017) Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature 549:261–264
Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos-Medllin C et al (2015) Structure, variation, and assembly of the root- associated microbiomes of rice. P Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E911–E920
Eisenhauer N, Milcu A, Sabais AC et al (2011) Plant diversity surpasses plant functional groups and plant productivity as driver of soil biota in the long term. PLoS ONE 6:e16055
Eisenhauer N, Dobies T, Cesarz S et al (2013) Plant diversity effects on soil food webs are stronger than those of elevated CO2 and N deposition in a long-term grassland experiment. P Natl Acad Sci USA 110:6889–6894
Ellis JG, Rafiqi M, Gan P et al (2009) Recent progress in discovery and functional analysis of effector proteins of fungal and oomycete plant pathogens. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:399–405
Estrada C, Wcislo WT, Van Bael SA (2013) Symbiotic fungi alter plant chemistry that discourages leaf-cutting ants. New Phytol 198:241–251
Estrada C, Degner EC, Rojas EI et al (2015) The role of endophyte diversity in protecting plants from defoliation by leaf-cutting ants. Curr Sci 109:55–61
Faeth SH, Saari S (2012) Fungal grass endophytes and arthropod communities: lessons from plant defence theory and multitrophic interactions. Fung Ecol 5:364–371
Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103:626–631
Fierer N, Breitbart M, Nulton J et al (2007a) Metagenomic and small-subunit rRNA analyses reveal the genetic diversity of bacteria, Archaea, fungi, and viruses in soil. Appl Environ Microb 73:7059–7066
Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007b) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364
Flores-Sanchez IJ, Verpoorte R (2009) Plant polyketide synthases: a fascinating group of enzymes. Plant Physiol Bioch 47:167–174
Frampton RA, Pitman AR, Fineran PC (2012) Advances in bacteriophage-mediated control of plant pathogens. Int J Microbiol 2012:326452
Frank AC, Saldierna Guzman JP, Shay JE (2017) Transmission of bacterial endophytes. Microorganisms 5:70
Frohlich J, Hyde KD (1999) Biodiversity of palm fungi in the tropics: are global fungal diversity estimates realistic? Biodivers Conserv 8:977–1004
Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA et al (2013) Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot 100:1738–1750
Gamboa MA, Bayman P (2001) Communities of endophytic fungi in leaves of a tropical timber tree Guarea Guidonia: Meliaceae) 1. Biotropica 33:352–360
Gamboa MA, Laureano S, Bayman P (2003) Measuring diversity of endophytic fungi in leaf fragments: does size matter? Mycopathologia 156:41–45
Ganley RJ, Newcombe G (2006) Fungal endophytes in seeds and needles of Pinus monticola. Mycol Res 110:318–327
Gans J, Wolinsky M, Dunbar J (2005) Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil. Science 309:1387–1390
Gao C, Shi NN, Liu YX et al (2013) Host plant genus-level diversity is the best predictor of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity in a Chinese subtropical forest. Mol Ecol 22:3403–3414
Gao C, Shi NN, Chen L et al (2017) Relationships between soil fungi and woody plant assemblages differ between ridge and valley habitats in a subtropical mountain forest. New Phytol 213:1874–1885
Garbeva P, Potsma J, Van Veen JA, Van Elas JD (2006) Effect of above-ground plant species on soil microbial community structure and its impact on suppression of Rhizoctonia solani AG3. Environm Microbiol 8:233–246
Garcia-Guzman G, Dirzo R (2001) Patterns of leaf-pathogen infection in the understory of a Mexican rain forest: incidence, spatiotemporal variation, and mechanisms of infection. Am J Bot 88:634–645
Gaume L, McKey D, Terrin S (1998) Ant-plant-homopteran mutualism: how the third partner affects the interaction between a plant-specialist ant and its myrmecophyte host. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 265:569–575
Gayathri S, Saravanan D, Radhakrishnan M, Balagurunathan R, Kathiresan K (2010) Bioprospecting potential of fast growing endophytic bacteria from leaves of mangrove and salt-marsh plant species. Indian J Biotechnol 9:397–402
Gentry AH (1988) Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Ann Mo Bot Gard 75:1–34
Gilbert GS (1995) Rain forest plant diseases: the canopy-understory connection. Selbyana 15:75–77
Gilbert GS (2005) Dimensions of plant disease in tropical forests. In: Burslem DFRP, Pinard MA, Hartley SE (eds) Biotic interactions in the tropics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–164
Gilbert GS, De Steven D (1996) A canker disease of seedlings and saplings of Tetragastris panamensis (Burseraceae) caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea in a lowland tropical forest. Plant Dis 80:684–687
Gilbert GS, Reynolds DR (2005) Nocturnal fungi: airborne spores in the canopy and understory of a tropical rain forest. Biotropica 37:462–464
Gilbert GS, Webb CO (2007) Phylogenetic signal in plant-pathogenic host range. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4979–4983
Gilbert GS, Foster RB, Hubbell SP (1994) Density and distance-to-adult effects of a canker disease of trees in a moist tropical forest. Oecologia 98:100–108
Gilbert GS, Harms KE, Hamill DN, Hubbell SP (2001) Effects of seedling size, El Nino drought, seedling density, and distance to nearest conspecific adult on 6-year survival of Ocotea whitei seedlings in Panama. Oecologia 127:1502–1507
Gillet JB (1962) Pest pressure, an underestimated factor in evolution. In: Systematics Association Publication no. 4, Taxonomy and Geography, pp 37–46
Giraldo MC, Valent B (2013) Filamentous plant pathogen effectors in action. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:800–814
Glazebrook J (2005) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytoapthol 43:205–227
Gottwald TR, Irey M (2007) Post-hurricane analysis of citrus canker II: predictive model estimation of disease spread and area potentially impacted by various eradication protocols following catastrophic weather events. Plant Health Progress. https://doi.org/10.1094/php-2007-0405-01rs
Gottwald TR, Graham JH, Schubert TS (2002) Citrus canker: the pathogen and its impact. Plant Health Progress. https://doi.org/10.1094/php-2002-0812-01-rv
Gourion B, Berrabah F, Ratet P, Stacey G (2015) Rhizobium-legume symbioses: the crucial role of plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci 20:186–194
Graham JH, Gottwald TR, Cubero J, Achor DS (2004) Xanthomonas axonopodis pv.citri: factors affecting successful eradication of citrus canker. Mol Plant Pathol 5:1–15
Griffin EA (2016) The greater unseen: on the identities, distributions, and impacts of foliar bacteria on tropical arboreal species. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
Griffin EA, Carson WP (2015) The ecology and natural history of foliar bacteria with a focus on tropical forests and agroecosystems. Bot Rev 81:105–149
Griffin EA, Traw MB, Morin PJ et al (2016) Foliar bacteria and soil fertility mediate seedling performance: a new and cryptic dimension of niche differentiation. Ecology 97:2998–3008
Griffin EA, Wright SJ, Morin PJ, Carson WP (2017) Pervasive interactions between foliar microbes and soil nutrients mediate leaf production and herbivore damage in a tropical forest. New Phytol 216:99–112
Gunatilaka AL (2006) Natural products from plant-associated microorganisms: distribution, structural diversity, bioactivity, and implications of their occurrence. J Nat Prod 69:509–526
Gutierrez-Manero FJ, Ramos-Solano B, Probanza A et al (2001) The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberellins. Physiol Plant 111:206–211
Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahaffee WF, Kloepper JW (1997) Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can J Microbiol 43:895–914
Hamilton AJ, Basset Y, Benke KK et al (2010) Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of tropical arthropod species richness. Am Nat 176:90–95
Hammer TJ, Van Bael SA (2015) An endophyte-rich diet increases ant predation on a specialist herbivorous insect. Ecol Entomol 40:316–321
Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD (2008) Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol 16:463–471
Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G et al (2015) The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol R 79:293–320
Harms KE, Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB (2001) Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50- ha Neotropical forest plot. J Ecol 89:947–959
Hausmann NT, Hawkes CV (2009) Plant neighborhood control of arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition. New Phytol 183:1188–1200
He J, Tedersoo L, Hu A et al (2017) Greater diversity of soil fungal communities and distinguishable seasonal variation in temperate deciduous forests compared with subtropical evergreen forests of eastern China. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93:fix069
Hedin LO, Brookshire EJ, Menge DN, Barron AR (2009) The nitrogen paradox in tropical forest ecosystems. Annu Rev of Ecol Evol S 40:613–635
Heil M, McKey D (2003) Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 34:425–553
Henis Y, Bashan Y (1986) Epiphytic survival of bacterial leaf pathogens. In: Fokkema NJ, van den Heuvel J (eds) Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 252–268
Higgins KL, Arnold AE, Miadlikowska J et al (2007) Phylogenetic relationships, host affinity, and geographic structure of boreal and arctic endophytes from three major plant lineages. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:543–555
Hiiesalu I, Partel M, Davidson J et al (2014) Species richness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: associations with grasslands plant richness and biomass. New Phytol 203:233–244
Hiiesalu I, Bahram M, Tedersoo L (2017) Plant species richness and productivity determine the diversity of soil fungal guilds in temperate coniferous forest and bog habitats. Mol Ecol 26:4846–4858
Hill DS, Waller JM (1982) Pests and disease of tropical crops. Longman, London
Hodgson S, Cates C, Hodgson J et al (2014) Vertical transmission of fungal endophytes is widespread in forbs. Ecol Evol 4:1199–1208
Hoffman MT, Gunatilaka MK, Wijeratne K et al (2013) Endohyphal bacterium enhances production of indole-3-acetic acid by a foliar fungal endophyte. PLoS ONE 8:e73132
Holldobler B, Wilson EO (2010) The leafcutter ants: civilization by instinct. WW Norton and Company Inc, New York
Hooper DU, Bignell DE, Brown VK et al (2000) Interactions between aboveground and belowground biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems: patterns, mechanisms, and feedbacks: we assess the evidence for correlation between aboveground and belowground diversity and conclude that a variety of mechanisms could lead to positive, negative, or no relationship-developing on the strength and type of interactions among species. AIBS Bulletin 50:1049–1061
Horn S, Hempel S, Verbruggen E et al (2017) Linking the community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plants: a story of interdependence? ISME J 11:1400–1411
Horst RK (1990) Westcott’s plant disease handbook, 5th edn. Chapman and Hall, New York
Hubbell SP (2001) The unified theory of biogeography and biodiversity. University Press, Princeton
Hubbell SP, Foster RB, O’Brien ST et al (1999) Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science 283:554–557
Hyde KD, Soytong K (2008) The fungal endophyte dilemma. Fungal Divers 163:e73
Hyde KD, Cai L, McKenzie EHC et al (2009) Colletotrichum: a catalogue of confusion. Fungal Divers 39:1–17
Innerebner G, Knief C, Vorholt JA (2011) Protection of Arabidopsis thaliana against leaf-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae by Sphingomonas strains in a controlled model system. Appl Environ Microb 77:3202–3210
Irey M, Gottwald TR, Graham JH et al (2006) Post-hurricane analysis of citrus canker spread and progress towards the development of a predictive model to estimate disease spread due to catastrophic weather events. Plant Health Progress. https://doi.org/10.1094/php-2006-0822-01-rs
Jaber LR, Vidal S (2010) Fungal endophyte negative effects on herbivory are enhanced on intact plants and maintained in a subsequent generation. Ecol Entomol 35:25–36
Jackson RW (2009) Plant pathogenic bacteria: genomic and molecular biology. Horizon Scientific Press
Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. P Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7362–7366
Janzen DH (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20:249–275
Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104:501–528
Ji P, Wilson M (2002) Assessment of the importance of similarity in carbon source utilization profiles between the biological control agent and the pathogen in biological control of bacterial speck of tomato. Appl Environ Microb 68:4383–4389
Jiang RHY, Tyler BM (2012) Mechanisms and evolution of virulence in oomycetes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:295–318
Johnson NC, Graham JH (2013) The continuum concept remains a useful framework for studying mycorrhizal functioning. Plant Soil 363:411–419
Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA (1997) Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualist-parasitism continuum. New Phytol 135:575–585
Johnson D, Vandenkoornhuyse PJ, Leake JR et al (2003) Plant communities affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and community composition in grassland microcosms. New Phytol 161:503–515
Jones JD, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444:323–329
Kembel SW, O’Conner TK, Arnold HK et al (2014) Relationships between phyllosphere bacterial communities and plant functional traits in a neotropical forest. P Natl Acad Sci USA 111:13715–13720
Kernaghan G, Widden P, Bergeron Y et al (2003) Biotic and biotic factors affecting ectomycorrhizal diversity in boreal mixed-woods. Oikos 102:497–504
Kitajima K, Augspurger CK (1989) Seed and seedling ecology of a monocarpic tropical tree, Tachigalia versicolor. Ecology 70:1102–1114
Kitajima K, Poorter L (2008) Functional basis for resource niche partitioning by tropical trees. In: Carson WP, Schnitzer SA (eds) Tropical Forest Community Ecology, pp 160–181
Kivlin SN, Hawkes CV (2011) Differentiating between effects of invasion and diversity: impacts of aboveground plant communities on belowground fungal communities. New Phytol 189:526–535
Kivlin SN, Hawkes CV (2016a) Tree species, spatial heterogeneity, and seasonality drive soil fungal abundance, richness, and composition in Neotropical rainforests. Environ Microbiol 18:4662–4673
Kivlin SN, Hawkes CV (2016b) Tree species, spatial heterogeneity, and seasonality drive soil fungal abundance, richness, and composition in Neotropical rainforests. Environm Microbiol 18:4662–4673
Kogel KH, Franken P, Huckelhoven R (2006) Endophyte or parasite—what decides? Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:358–363
Konig S, Wubet T, Dormann CF et al (2010) TaqMan real-time PCR assays to assess arbuscular mycorrhizal responses to field manipulation of grassland biodiversity: effects of soil characteristics, plant species richness, and functional traits. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3765–3775
Kowalchuk GA, Buma DS, de Boer W et al (2002) Effects of above-ground plant species composition and diversity on the diversity of soil-borne microorganisms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 815:509–520
Krugner R, Lopes MDC, Santos JD et al (2000) Transmission efficiency of Xylella fastidiosa to citrus by sharpshooters and identification of two new vector species. In: Conference of international organization of citrus virologists, vol 14, p 423
Kuldau G, Bacon C (2008) Clavivipitaceous endophytes: their ability to enhance resistance of grasses to multiple stresses. Biol Control 46:57–71
Kuzyakov Y, Domanski G (2000) Carbon input by plants into the soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:421–431
Laforest-Lapointe I, Paquette A, Messier C, Kembel SW (2017) Leaf bacterial diversity mediates plant diversity and ecosystem function relationships. Nature 546:145–147
LaManna JA, Mangan SA, Alonso A et al (2017) Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale. Science 356:1389–1392
Lambais MR, Crowley DE, Cury JC et al (2006) Bacterial diversity in tree canopies of the Atlantic forest. Science 312:1917--1917
Lambais MR, Lucheta AR, Crowley DE (2014) Bacterial community assemblages associated with the phyllosphere, dermosphere, and rhizosphere of tree species of the Atlantic forest are host taxon dependent. Microb Ecol 68:567–574
Lambais MR, Barrera SE, Santos EC et al (2017) Phyllosphere metaproteomes of trees from the Brazilian Atlantic forest show high levels of functional redundancy. Microb Ecol 73:123–134
Landis FC, Gargas A, Givnish TJ (2004) Relationships among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, vascular plants and environmental conditions in oak savannas. New Phytol 164:493–504
Lange M, Eisenhauer N, Sierra CA et al (2015) Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nature Comm 6:6707
Lefcheck JS, Byrnes JE, Isbell F et al (2015) Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats. Nat Comm 6:6936
Lennon JT, Jones SE (2011) Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:119–130
Lindow SE, Brandl MT (2003) Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microb 69:1875–1883
Lindow SE, Desurmont C, Elkins R et al (1998) Occurrence of indole-3-acetic acid-producing bacteria on pear trees and their association with fruit russet. Phytopathology 88:1149–1157
Llado S, Lopez-Mondejar R, Baldrian P (2017) Forest soil bacteria: diversity, involvement in ecosystem processes, and response to global change. Microbiol Mol Biol R 81:e00063--16
Lodge D, Hawksworth DL, Ritchie BJ (1996) Microbial diversity and tropical forest functioning. Biodiversity and ecosystem processes in tropical forests. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 69–100
Lopes JRS, Krugner R, Brown J (2016) Transmission ecology and epidemiology of the citrus variegated chlorosis strain of Xylella fastidiosa. In: Brown JK (ed) Vector-mediated transmission of plant pathogens. APS Press, pp 195–208
Loranger-Merciris G, Barthes L, Gastine A, Leadley P (2006) Rapid effects of plant species diversity and identity on soil microbial communities in experimental grassland ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2336–2343
Ludwig-Muller J (2015) Plants and endophytes: equal partners in secondary metabolite production? Biotechnol Lett 37:1325–1334
Ma B, Hibbing ME, Kim H-S et al (2007) Host range and molecular phylogenies of the soft rot Enterobacterial genera Pectobacterium and Dickeya. Phytopathology 97:1150–1163
Malcolm GM, Kuldau GA, Gugino BK, Jimenez-Gasco MDM (2013) Hidden host plant associations of soilbourne fungal pathogens: an ecological perspective. Phytopathology 103:538–544
Mandyam KG, Roe J, Jumpponen A (2014) Mutualism-parasitism paradigm synthesized from results of root-endophyte models. Front Microbiol 5:776
Mangan SA, Schnitzer SA, Herre EA et al (2010) Negative plant-soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest. Nature 466:752–755
Mansfield J, Genin S, Magori S et al (2012) Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13:614–629
Maor R, Haskin S, Levi-Kedmi H, Sharon A (2004) In planta production of indole-3-acetic acid by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1852–1854
Marcelino J, Giordano R, Gouli S et al (2008) Colletrtrichum acutatum var. fioriniae (telemorph: Glomerella acutata var. fioriniae var. nov.) infection of a scale insect. Mycologia 100:353–374
Marquez SS, Bills GF, Herrero N, Zabalgogeazcoa I (2012) Non-systemic fungal endophytes of grasses. Fungal Endophyes 5:289–297
Mathimaran N, Ruh R, Jama B et al (2007) Impact of agricultural management on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in Kenyan ferralsol. Agr Ecosyst Environ 119:22–32
May RM (1988) How many species are there on earth? Science 241:1441–1449
May RM (1990) How many species? Philos Trans Biol Sci 330:293–304
Mejia LC, Rojas EI, Maynard Z et al (2008) Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents of Theobroma cacao pathogens. Biol Control 46:4–14
Mejia LC, Herre EA, Sparks JP et al (2014) Pervasive effects of a dominant foliar endophytic fungus on host genetic and phenotypic expression in a tropical tree. Front Microbiol 5:479
Mellotto M, Underwood W, Koczan J et al (2006) Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell 126:969–980
Mellotto M, Underwood W, He SY (2008) Role of stomata in plant innate immunity and foliar bacterial diseases. Annu Rev Phytoapthol 46:101–122
Mercado-Blanco J, Prieto P (2012) Bacterial endophytes and root hairs. Plant Soil 361:301–306
Meyer KM, Leveau JHJ (2012) Microbiology of the phyllosphere: a playground for testing ecological concepts. Oecologia 168:621–629
Milcu A, Allan E, Roscher C et al (2013) Functionally and phylogenetically diverse plant communities key to soil biota. Ecology 94:1878–1885
Mirzaei J, Moradi M (2017) Relationships between flora biodiversity, soil physiochemical properties, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) diversity in a semi-arid forest. Plant Ecol Evol 150(2):151–159
Mordecai EA (2011) Pathogen impacts on plant communities: unifying theory, concepts, and empirical work. Ecol Monogr 81:429–441
Morris CE, Monteil CL, Berge O (2013) The life history of Pseudomonas syringae: linking agriculture to earth system processes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 51:85–104
Moyes AB, Kueppers LM, Pett-Ridge J et al (2016) Evidence of foliar endophytic nitrogen fixation in a widely distributed subalpine conifer. New Phytol 210:657–668
Murali TS, Suryanarayanan TS, Geeta R (2006) Endophytic Phomopsis species: host range and implications for diversity estimates. Can J Microbiol 52:673–680
Negus D, Moore C, Baker M, Raghunathan D, Tyson J, Sockett RE (2017) Killing Gram-negative pathogens in a host setting? Annu Rev Microbiol 71:441–457
Newsham KK, Fitter AH, Watkinson AR (1994) Root pathogenic and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi determine fecundity of asymptomatic plants in the field. J Ecol 82:805–814
Nisa H, Kamili AN, Nawchoo IA et al (2015) Fungal endophytes as prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products: a review. Microb Pathogenesis 82:50–59
Nunan N, Daniell TJ, Singh BK et al (2005) Links between rhizoplane bacterial communities in grassland soils, characterized using molecular technologies. Appl Environm Microbiol 71:6784–6792
Ohm RA, Feau N, Henrissat B, Schoch CL, Horwitz BA, Barry KW, Condon BJ, Copeland AC, Dhillon B, Glaser F, Hesse SN (2012) Diverse lifestyles and strategies of plant pathogenesis encoded in the genomes of eighteen Dothideomycetes fungi. PLoS Pathog 8:e1003037
Oliver TH, Heard MS, Isaac NJ et al (2015) Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol Evol 11:673–684
Opik M, Moora M, Liira J, Zobel M (2006) Composition of root-colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in different ecosystems around the globe. J Ecol 94:778–790
Pajares S, Bohannan BJ (2016) Ecology of nitrogen fixing, nitrifying, and denitrifying microorganisms in tropical forest soils. Front Microbiol 7:1045
Partida-Martinez LP, Hertweck C (2005) Pathogenic fungus harbours endosymbiotic bacteria for toxin production. Nature 437:884–888
Partida-Martinez LP, Groth I, Schmitt I et al (2007a) Burkholderia rhizoxinica sp. nov. and Burkholderia endofungorum sp. nov., bacterial endosymbionts of the plant-pathogenic fungus Rhizopus microspores. Int J Syst Evol Micr 57:2583–2590
Partida-Martinez LP, Monajembashi S, Greulich K-O, Hertweck C (2007b) Endosymbiont-dependent host reproduction maintains bacterial-fungal mutualism. Curr Biol 17:773–777
Pawlowski J, Audic S, Adl S et al (2012) CBOL protest working group: barcoding eukaryotic richness beyond the animal, plant, and fungal kingdoms. PLoS Biol 10:e1001419
Peay KG, Kennedy PG, Davies SJ et al (2010) Potential link between plant and fungal distributions in a dipterocarp rainforest: community and phylogenetic structure of tropical ectomycorrhizal fungi across a plant and soil ecotone. New Phytol 185:529–542
Peay KG, Baraloto C, Fine PV (2013) Strong coupling of plant and fungal community structure across western Amazonian rainforests. ISME J 7 (9):1852–1861
Petrini O (1991) Fungal endophytes of tree leaves. Microbial ecology of leaves. Springer, New York, pp 179–197
Phillips RP, Finzi AC, Bernhardt ES (2011) Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long-term CO2 fumigation. Ecol Lett 14:187–194
Pieterse CM, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL et al (2014) Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52:347–375
Pineda A, Zheng SJ, van Loon JJ et al (2010) Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbes. Trends Plant Sci 15:507–514
Pires DP, Cleto S, Sillankorva S, Azaredo J, Lu TK (2016) Genetically engineered phages: a review of advances over the last decade. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 80:523–543
Porazinska DL, Bardgett RD, Blaauw MB et al (2003) Relationships at the above-ground-belowground interface: plants, soil biota, and soil processes. Ecol Monog 73:377–395
Porras-Alfaro A, Bayman P (2011) Hidden fungi, emergent properties: endophytes and microbiomes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 49:291–315
Prober SM, Leff JW, Bates ST et al (2015) Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide. Ecol Lett 18:85–95
Prusky D (1996) Pathogen quiescence in postharvest harvest. Annu Rev Phytol 34:413–434
Purcell AH, Finlay AH, McLean DL (1979) Pierce’s disease bacterium: mechanism of transmission by leafhopper vectors. Science 206:839–841
Ramos Solano B, Barriuso Maicas J, Pereyra De La Iglesia MT et al (2008) Systemic disease protection elicited by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria strains: relationship between metabolic responses, systemic disease protection, and biotic elicitors. Phytopathology 98:451–457
Redak RA, Purcell AH, Lopes JRS et al (2004) The biology of xylem fluid-feeding insect vectors of Xylella fastidiosa and their relation to disease epidemiology. Annu Rev Entomol 49:243–270
Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T (1998) Life in grasses: diazotrophic endophytes. Trends Microbiol 6:139–144
Robinson M, Riov J, Sharon A (1998) Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:5030–5032
Rockwood LL (1976) Plant selection and foraging patterns in two species of leaf-cutting ants (Atta). Ecology 57:48–61
Rodriguez RJ, White JF Jr, Arnold AE, Redman RS (2009) Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol 182:314–330
Rojas EI, Rehner SA, Samuels GJ et al (2010) Colletotrichum gloeosporioides sl associated with Theobroma cacao and other plants in Panama: multilocus phylogenies distinguish host-associated pathogens from asymptomatic endophytes. Mycologia 102:1318–1338
Rousk J, Baath E, Brookes PC et al (2010) Soil bacteria and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. The ISME J 4:1340–1351
Rudgers JA, Clay K (2007) Endophyte symbiosis with tall fescue: how strong are the impacts on communities and ecosystems? Fungal Biol Rev 21:107–124
Ryan RP, Vorholter FJ, Potnis N (2011) Pathogenomics of Xanthomonas: understanding bacterium-plant interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:344–355
Saikkonen K, Faeth SH, Helander M, Sullivan TJ (1998) Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants. Annu Rev of Ecol S 29:319–343
Saikkonen K, Wali P, Helander M, Faeth SH (2004) Evolution of endophyte-plant symbioses. Trends Plant Sci 9:275–280
Saikkonen K, Saari S, Helander M (2010) Defensive mutualism between plants and endophytic fungi? Fungal Divers 41:101–113
Salvioli A, Chiapello M, Fontaine J et al (2010) Endobacteria affect the metabolic profile of their host Gigaspora margarita, and arbuscular myccorhizal fungus. Environ Microbiol 12:2083–2095
Salvioli A, Ghignone S, Novero M et al (2016) Symbiosis with an endobacterium increases the fitness of a mycorhhizal fungus, raising its bioenergentic potential. ISME J 10:130–144
Santoyo G, Moredno-Hagelsieb G, del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda M, Glick BR (2016) Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol Res 183:92–99
Sarkar S, Guttman DS (2004) Evolution of the core genome of Pseudomonas syringae, a highly clonal, endemic plant pathogen. Appl Environ Microb 70:1999–2012
Sarmiento C, Zalamea P-C, Dalling JW et al (2017) Soilborne fungi have host affinity and host-specific effects on seed germination and survival in a lowland tropical forest. P Natl Acad Sci 14:11458–11463
Sato Y, Narisawa K, Tsuruta K et al (2010) Detection of Betaproteobacteria inside the mycelium of the fungus Mortierella elongate. Microbes Environ 25:321–324
Scardaci SC, Webster RK, Greer CA et al (1997) Rice blast: a new disease in California, Agronomy Fact, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, Sheet Series, 1997–2
Schappe T, Albornoz FE, Turner BL et al (2017) The role of soil chemistry and plant neighbourhoods in structuring fungal communities in three Panamanian rainforests. J Ecol 105:569–579
Schardl CL, Leuchtmann A, Spiering MJ (2004) Symbioses of grasses with seedborne fungal endophytes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:315–340
Schellenber B, Ramel C, Dudler R (2010) Pseudomonas syringae virulence factor syringolin A counteracts stomatal immunity by proteasome inhibition. Mol Plant-Microbe In 23:1287–1293
Schlatter DC, Bakker MG, Bradeen JM, Kinkel LL (2015) Plant community richness and microbial interactions structure bacterial communities in soil. Ecology 96:134–142
Schleuning M, Frund J, Garcia D (2015) Predicting ecosystem functions from biodiversity and mutualistic networks: an extension of trait-based concepts to plant-animal interactions. Ecography 38:380–392
Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2006) Toward a census of bacteria in soil. PLoS Comput Biol 2:e92
Schmelz EA, Engelbert J, Alborn HT et al (2003) Simultaneous analysis of phytohormones, phytotoxins, and volatile organic compounds in plants. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10552–10557
Schultz B, Boyle C, Draeger S et al (2002) Endophytic fungi: a source of novel biologically active secondary metabolites. Mycolog Res 106:996–1004
Schulz B, Boyle C (2005) The endophytic continuum. Mycol Res 109:661–686
Schulz B, Coyne DP (2006) What are endophytes? In: Schulz BJE, Boyle CJC, Sieber TN (eds) Microbial root endophytes. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13
Shaffer JP, Sarmiento C, Zalamea PC et al (2016) Diversity, specificity, and phylogenetic relationships of endophyphal bacteria in fungi that inhabit tropical seeds and leaves. Front Ecol Evol 4:116
Sharma M, Schmid M, Rothballer M et al (2008) Detection and identification of bacteria intimately associated with fungi in the order Sebacinales. Cell Microbiol 10:2235–2246
Shivas RG, Hyde KD (1997) Biodiversity of plant pathogenic fungi in the tropics. Biodiversity of tropical microfungi. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 47–56
Silby MW, Winstanley C, Godfrey SAC et al (2011) Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:652–680
Silvertown J (2004) Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends Ecol Evol 19:605–611
Sockett RE (2009) Predatory lifestyle of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. Annu Rev Microb 63:523–539
Sorensen J, Sessitsch A (2007) Plant-associated bacteria-lifestyle and molecular interactions. Modern Soil Microbiology CRC Press LLC
Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R (2007) Indole-3-acetoc acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:425–448
Stephan A, Meyer AH, Schmid B (2000) Plant diversity affects culturable soil bacteria in experimental grassland communities. J Ecol 88:988–998
Stergiopoulos I, de Wit PJ (2009) Fungal effector proteins. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47:233–263
Stone JK, Bacon CW, White JF (2000) An overview of endophytic microbes: endophytism defined. Microb endophy 3:29–33
Stork NE, McBroom J, Gely C, Hamilton AJ (2015) New approaches narrow global species estimates for beetles, insects, and terrestrial arthropods. P Natl Acad Sci USA 112:7519–7523
Strack D, Fester T, Hause B et al (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhiza: biological, chemical, and molecular aspects. J Chem Ecol 29:1955–1979
Strobel G (2012) Genetic diversity of microbial endophytes and their biotechnical applications. Genomics applications for the developing world. Springer, New York, pp 249–262
Strobel G, Daisy B, Castillo U, Harper J (2004) Natural products from endophytic microorganisms. J Nat Prod 67:257–268
Suryanarayanan TS, Murali TS, Venkatesan G (2002) Occurrence and distribution of fungal endophytes in tropical forests across a rainfall gradient. Can J Bot 80:818–826
Suryanarayanan TS, Venkatesan G, Murali TS (2003) Endophytic fungal communities in leaves of tropical forest trees: diversity and distribution patterns. Current Sci 85:489–493
Suryanarayanan TS, Murali TS, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2011) Endophytic fungal communities in woody perennials of three tropical forest types of the Western Ghats, southern India. Biodivers Conserv 20:913–928
Tanaka A, Takemoto D, Chuji T, Scott B (2012) Fungal endophytes of grasses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15:462–468
Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Cajthaml T et al (2016) Tree diversity and species identity effects on soil fungi, protists and animals are context dependent. ISME J 10:346–362
Thines M (2014) Phylogeny and evolution of plant pathogenic oomycetes—a global overview. Eur J Plant Pathol 138:431–447
Thompson GL, Kao-Kniffin J (2016) Diversity enhances NPP, N retention, and soil microbial diversity in experimental urban grassland assemblages. PLoS ONE 11:e0155986
Thurston HD (1998) Tropical plant diseases, 2nd edn. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN
Tiemann LK, Grandy AS, Atkinson EE et al (2015) Ecol Lett 18:761–771
Tilman D (2016) Biodiversity: from evolutionary origins to ecosystem functioning. Contr Sci 11:11–20
Tilman D, Isbell F, Cowles JM (2014) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 45:471–493
Torsvik V, Ovrea L, Thingstad TF (2002) Prokaryotic diversity—magnitude, dynamics, and controlling factors. Science 296:1064–1066
Tortora GJ, Funke BR, Case CL, Johnson TR (2016) Microbiology: an introduction, 12th ed. Pearson Education, Inc
Tran H, Ficke A, Asiimwe T et al (2007) Role of the cyclic lipopeptide massetolide A in biological control of Phyphthora infestans and in colonization of tomato plants by Pseudomonas fluorescens. New Phytol 175:731–742
Tripathi L, Mwangi M, Abele S et al (2009) Xanthomonas wilt: a threat to banana production in East and Central Africa. Plant Dis 93:440–451
Truyens S, Weyens N, Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J (2015) Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Env Microbiol Rep 7:40–50
Urcelay C, Diaz S, Gurvich DE et al (2009) Mycorrhizal community resilience to experimental plant functional type removals in a woody ecosystem. J Ecol 97:1291–1301
Van Bael SA, Valencia MC, Rojas EI et al (2009) Effects of foliar endophytic fungi on the preference and performance of the leaf beetle Chelymorpha alternans in Panama. Biotropica 41:221–225
Van Bael SA, Seid MA, Wcislo WT (2012) Endophytic fungi increase the processing rate of leaves by leaf-cutting ants (Atta). Ecol Entomol 37:318–321
Van Bael S, Estrada C, Arnold AE (2017) Foliar endophyte communities and leaf traits in tropical trees. In: Dighton J, White JF (eds) The fungal community: its organization and role in the ecosystem, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 79–92
Van Peer R, Niemann GJ, Schippers B (1991) Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS 417 r. Phytopathology 81:728–734
Velicer GJ, Vos M (2009) Sociobiology of the myxobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:599–623
Verhagen BW, Trotel-Aziz P, Couderchet M et al (2010) Pseudomonas spp.-induced systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea is associated with induction and priming of defence responses in grapevine. J Exp Bot 61:249–260
Vitousek PM, Menge DNL, Reed SC, Cleveland CC (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns, and ecological controls in terrestrial ecoystems. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20130119
Vorholt JA (2012) Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:828–840
Waksman SA, Schatz A, Reynolds DM (2010) Production of antibiotic substances by actinomycetes. Ann New York Acad Sci 1213:112–124
Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Blackwood CB et al (2006) Resource availability controls fungal diversity across a plant diversity gradient. Ecol Lett 9:1127–1135
Wang J, Chapman SJ, Yao H (2016) Incorporation of 13 C-labelled rice rhizodeposiition into soil microbial communities under different fertilizer applications. Appl Soil Ecol 101:11–19
Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Barker GM et al (1999) Plant removals in perennial grassland: vegetation dynamics, decomposers, soil biodiversity, and ecosystem properties. Ecol Monog 69:535–568
Wardle DA, Yeates GW, Williamson W, Bonner KI (2003) The response of a three trophic level soil food web to the identity and diversity of plant species and functional groups. Oikos 102:45–56
Wellman FL (1968) More disease on crops in the tropics than in the temperate zone. Ceiba 14:17–28
Wellman FL (1972) Tropical American plant disease. The Scarecrow Press Inc., Metuchen, NJ
Werth M, Kuzyakov Y (2010) 13C fractionation at the root-microorganisms-soil interface: a review and outlook for partitioning studies. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1372–1384
Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ (1998) Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. P Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6578–6583
Willey J, Sherwood L, Woolverton CJ (2016) Prescott’s microbiology, 10th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York
Wilson D (1995) Endophyte: the evolution of the term, and clarification of its use and definition. Oikos 73:274–276
Wilson M, Lindow SE (1994) Coexistence among epiphytic bacterial populations mediated through nutritional resource partitioning. Appl Environ Microb 60:4468–4477
Wooldridge K (2009) Bacterial secreted proteins: secretory mechanisms and role in pathogenesis. Horizon Scientific Press
Wright SJ (2002) Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130:1–14
Yang S, Zhang Q, Guo J et al (2006) Global effect of indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis on multiple virulence factors of Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937. Appl Environ Microb 73:1079–1088
Yang T, Adams JM, Shi Y et al (2017) Soil fungal diversity in natural grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: associations with plant diversity and productivity. New Phytol 215:756–765
Zak DR, Holmes WE, White DC et al (2003) Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links? Ecology 84:2042–2050
Zalamea PC, Sarmiento C, Arnold AE et al (2015) Do soil microbes and abrasion by soil particles influence persistence and loss of physical dormancy in seeds of tropical pioneers? Front Plant Sci 5:799
Zamioudis C, Pieterse CM (2012) Modulation of host immunity by beneficial microbes. Mol Plant- Microbe In 25:139–150
Zhao Y, Thilmony R, Bender CL et al (2003) Virulence systems of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato promote bacterial speck disease in tomato by targeting the jasmonate signaling pathway. Plant J 36:485–499
Zimmerman NB, Vitousek PM (2012) Fungal endophyte communities reflect environmental structuring across a Hawaiian landscape. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109:13022–13027
Acknowledgements
We thank Melissa McCormick, Dennis Whigham, and Natalie Christian for helpful discussions over the course of this work and comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We like to thank Allen Herre and Betsy Arnold in particular for extensive help and comments during the course of this work. Moreover, we thank Betsy Arnold and Francois Lutzoni for permission to use Fig. 1. We acknowledge financial support from the National Science Foundation, the University of Pittsburgh, the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Sigma Xi, and the American Philosophical Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 This chapter is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Griffin, E.A., Carson, W.P. (2018). Tree Endophytes: Cryptic Drivers of Tropical Forest Diversity. In: Pirttilä, A., Frank, A. (eds) Endophytes of Forest Trees. Forestry Sciences, vol 86. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89833-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89833-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89832-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89833-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)