Abstract
The ‘educators’ charge’ is to answer what our priority should be in educating college and university students. Despite shifts in terminology, a long-standing view is that educators should develop the moral sensitivity of their students to prepare them for both their private, civic lives as well as their professional roles and positions in institutions and society. In this chapter, I explain the development of the concept of moral sensitivity, and that it is a complex discriminative or diagnostic expertise that functions as guide for moral action: a sophisticated ability to ‘see’ or diagnose the right course of action based on extensive learning and practice. Ethics Across the Curriculum (EAC) Programs are uniquely poised to develop moral sensitivity because they provide (1) diverse perspectives and resources from a variety of fields, (2) the ability to focus on developing specific domains of capacities that underlie moral sensitivity, (3) the opportunity to practice and develop moral sensitivity over the span of several years, and (4) the opportunity for directed training of moral sensitivity under the expert and watchful eye of professors and other professionals. Institutions without a robust EAC program may also be able to initiate the moral sensitivity of their students through the use of a specially designed stand-alone Professional Ethics course. The educators’ charge is to develop moral sensitivity, which can be accomplished across a range of institutional opportunities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Hume referred to the capacity of moral sensitivity as ‘sympathy’ in the Treatise of Human Nature, but in later writings—most specifically in the Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals—he referred to it as ‘benevolence.’.
- 2.
- 3.
Although many situations require the accurate identification and comprehension of the mental states of others, not all do: some situations involve the analysis of potential risks and harms or mere knowledge of patterns (e.g., the long-term psychological effects of verbal abuse). Empathy is an important underlying capacity for moral sensitivity, but it is neither necessary nor sufficient for its operation. As a consequence, although empathy is an important component to study and cultivate, it should not be equated with moral sensitivity. See Smith et al. (2011) and Steuber (2006) for discussion of empathy as a capacity for accurate knowledge of the mental states of others as well as Coplan and Goldie’s (2014) edited volume for extensive discussion about the role of empathy.
- 4.
Similarly, while compassion is an important underlying capacity for moral sensitivity, it is also neither necessary nor sufficient for the operation of moral sensitivity. Although compassion can be a helpful motivating force for action and support the ability to see the needs of others, accurate diagnoses of morally appropriate actions do not require such an emotive response. Further, a developed capacity of moral sensitivity may need to dampen the effects of compassion to avoid bias and compassion fatigue for moral appropriateness. For a contrasting view on the necessity of compassion within the professions, see Maxwell (2008).
- 5.
- 6.
For detailed discussion about how to assess the development of the cognitive underpinnings of moral sensitivity see Thoma (2015).
- 7.
For discussion of how moral sensitivity can be assessed longitudinally over the span of a student’s education see Jameson et al. (2015).
References
American Association of Colleges and Universities. (2014). Character traits associated with the five dimensions of personal and social responsibility: Core commitments: Educating students for personal and social responsibility. www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/CharacterTraitsofthe5Dimensions.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2014.
Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., et al. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. By Terence Irwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Baker, R. (2018). Union college. In E. E. Englehardt & M. S. Pritchard (Eds.), Ethics across the curriculum: Pedagogical perspectives (this volume). New York, NY: Springer.
Bebeau, M., Rest, J., & Narvaez, D. (1999). Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education. Educational Researcher, 28, 18–26.
Blum, D. (2004). Love at Goon Park. New York, NY: Berkley Publishing.
Blum, L. (1991). Moral perception and particularity. Ethics, 101, 701–725.
Coplan, A., & Goldie, P. (Eds.). (2014). Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davis, M. (2018). Illinois Institute of Technology. In E. E. Englehardt & M. S. Pritchard (Eds.), Ethics across the curriculum: Pedagogical perspectives (this volume). New York, NY: Springer.
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1979). The Belmont Report. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/.
Dey, E., Antonaros, M., Ott, M., Barnhardt, C., & Holsapple, M. (2010). Developing a moral compass: What is the campus climate or ethic and academic integrity?. Washinton, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Donovan, A. (2018). Dartmouth College. In E. E. Englehardt & M. S. Pritchard (Eds.), Ethics across the curriculum: Pedagogical perspectives (this volume). New York, NY: Springer.
Englehardt, E. E. (2018). Utah Valley University. In E. E. Englehardt & M. S. Pritchard (Eds.), Ethics across the curriculum: Pedagogical perspectives (this volume). New York, NY: Springer.
Frayn, M. (1998). Copenhagen. (play).
Frey, W., & Cruz, J. (2018). University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez. In E. E. Englehardt & M. S. Pritchard (Eds.), Ethics across the curriculum: Pedagogical perspectives (this volume). New York, NY: Springer.
Frontline. Remember My Lai (documentary).
Herkert, J., & Ellison, K. (2018). Arizona State University. In E. E. Englehardt & M. S. Pritchard (Eds.), Ethics across the curriculum: Pedagogical perspectives (this volume). New York, NY: Springer.
Hume, D. (1751/1957). Enquiry concerning the principles of morals. C. W. Hendell (Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
Hume, D. (1888/1978). Treatise of human nature (2nd ed.), Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch (Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press (Oxford University Press).
Hutcheson, F. (1993). Inaugural lecture on the social nature of man. In T. Mautner (Ed.), Francis Hutcheson: Two texts on human nature (pp. 124–147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jameson, M. M., Fuhrman, H., & Mower, D. S. (2015). A portfolio approach to integrated moral sensitivity. In D. S. Mower, P. Vandenberg, & W. L. Robison (Eds.), Developing moral sensitivity (pp. 246–263). New York, NY: Routledge.
Jordan, J. (2007). Taking the first step toward a moral action: A review of moral sensitivity measurement across domains. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 323–359.
Kaufman, M. (2000). The Laramie Project (play).
Maxwell, B. (2008). Professional ethics education: Studies in compassionate empathy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mower, D. S., Vandenberg, P., & Robison, W. L. (Eds.). (2015). Developing moral sensitivity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Newton, L. (2018). Fairfield University. In E. E. Englehardt & M. S. Pritchard (Eds.), Ethics across the curriculum: Pedagogical perspectives (this volume). New York, NY: Springer.
Rest, J. (1982). A psychologist looks at the teaching of ethics. Hastings Center Report, 12, 29–36.
Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
Rest, J. (1994). Background: Theory and research. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Robison, W. L. (2018). Rochester Institute of Technology. In E. E. Englehardt & M. S. Pritchard (Eds.), Ethics across the curriculum: Pedagogical perspectives (this volume). New York, NY: Springer.
Skloot, R. (2011). The immortal life of Henrietta lacks. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
Sloan, D. (1980). The teaching of ethics in the American undergraduate curriculum, 1876–1976. In D. Callahan & S. Bok (Eds.), Ethics teaching in higher education (pp. 1–57). The Hastings Center, Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Smith, A. (1759/2000). The theory of moral sentiments. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Smith, J. L., Ickes, W., Hall, J. A., & Hodges, S. D. (Eds.). (2011). Managing interpersonal sensitivity: Knowing when-and when not-to understand others. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Steuber, K. (2006). Rediscovering empathy: Agency, folk psychology, and the human sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Swaner, L. (2004). Educating for personal & social responsibility: A planning project for the Association of American Colleges and Universities. A Review of the Literature. Association of American Colleges and Universities, September 13, 4. www.aacu.org/core_commitments/documents/review_of_lit_000.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2014.
Swaner, L. (2005). Educating for personal and social responsibility: A review of the literature. Liberal Education, 91, 14–21.
The Hastings Center. (1980). Hastings Center Project on the teaching of ethics: Summary recommendations. In D. Callahan & S. Bok (Eds.), Ethics teaching in higher education (pp. 299–302). The Hastings Center, Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Thoma, S. J. (2015). A Neo-Kohlbergian tale of two sensitivities. In D. S. Mower, P. Vandenberg, & W. L. Robison (Eds.), Developing moral sensitivity (pp. 227–245). New York, NY: Routledge.
Weaver, K., Morse, J., & Mitcham, C. (2008). Ethical sensitivity in professional practice: Concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 607–618.
Woodson, S., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Colorado School of Mines. In E. E. Englehardt & M. S. Pritchard (Eds.), Ethics across the curriculum: Pedagogical perspectives (this volume). New York, NY: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mower, D.S. (2018). Increasing the Moral Sensitivity of Professionals. In: Englehardt, E.E., Pritchard, M.S. (eds) Ethics Across the Curriculum—Pedagogical Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78939-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78939-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78938-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78939-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)