Abstract
To promote flexible integration of distributed energy resources into the smart grid, the notion of Virtual Power Plants (VPPs) was proposed. VPPs are formed by the integration of heterogeneous systems, organizations and entities which collaborate to ensure optimal generation, distribution, storage, and sale of energy in the energy market. The collaborative nature of VPPs gives the semblance of collaborative business ecosystem, constituted of a mix of highly interdependent relationship among stakeholders. The systematic literature review methodology is used to summarize research evidence of emerging convergence between the Collaborative Networks (CN) and VPP domains. It is observed that, various strategic and dynamic collaborative alliances are formed within a VPP which are similar to various CN organizational forms like: Virtual Breeding Environments (VBE), grasping opportunity driven-networks etc. CN principles like: virtual organization creation, operation and dissolution, negotiation, broker services, etc., are also found. Emerging collaborative forms like hybrid collaborations between known traditional CN forms were also visible.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The VPP concept is rapidly transforming the way we think, design and plan the development of future energy grids. This is because VPPs have the capability of increasing the chances of integrating renewable energy sources into the conventional power grid. The advantage of this development is the enhancement of sustainable energy generation and its subsequent decline in the use of fossil-based energy sources. It also enhances decentralization of the energy grid from a single supply system to a more liberal and diverse supply, based on multiple sources [1]. The VPP concept will also enable small-scale energy producers to participate in the electricity market and will eventually help to overcome the stochastic nature of distributed energy resources (DERs), resulting in a more stable power grid [2].
The VPP concept is supported by a merge of different technological and managerial concepts, principles and ideas from diverse domains and fields of study. One of such fields is the domain of Collaborative Networks (CN) which embodies knowledge about collaboration amongst heterogenous organizations, systems, and entities which are autonomous in nature and are geographically dispersed. These CNs usually collaborate to achieve common and compatible goals [3].
The objective of this work is to perform a panoramic review of the area of VPPs to primarily identify common grounds where both domains converge. This is necessary because VPPs are constituted of integration of heterogenous systems, organizations, and entities which collaborate to ensure optimal generation, distribution, storage, and sale of renewable energy in the energy market. The main contribution of this paper is the extraction of the underlying collaborative mechanisms, organizational forms, motivation for collaborations, key collaboration agents/players as well as related technologies within the VPP area, using foreknowledge in CNs.
2 Relationship to Resilient Systems
VPPs are anticipated to help in overcoming the stochastic nature of DERs which will result in a more stable and smart power grid. However, with the current level of system integration which includes: high levels of artificial intelligence, smart cyber components, cloud computing, IoT, etc., incorporated in the power grid, coupled with frequent disruptive events around the globe which include: natural disasters, globalization, climate change, economic crisis, demographic shifts, fast technological evolution, terrorism and cyber-attacks, the power grid is becoming more and more susceptible to many forms of attacks which will eventually endanger the sustainability of the grid.
The collaborative and decentralized nature of VPPs however presents a good opportunity to incorporate resilience into the power grid. For instance in [4] a collaborative observation network consisting of multiple DERs within the power system which monitor the behaviors of all its neighbors, and collectively decide to isolate DERs suspected to be under attack is proposed. Again, Egbue et al. [5], concluded in a survey work that micro-grids, which also function collaboratively like VPPs have high potential to increase the reliability and resilience of the smart grid during a blackout or cyber-attack. This is because the decentralized nature of micro-grids/VPPs can provide direct cyber-security benefits if structured properly.
In relation to resilient systems, or towards a resilient power grid, the VPPs concept is hereby perceived as essential components of the grid which cannot simply be overlooked.
3 Survey Approach
To establish a credible correlation of the application of CN principles in the domain of VPPs, the systematic literature review (SLR) method was used. The motivation for this approach is that it provides a balanced and objective summary of research evidence, by evaluating and interpreting available research work, relevant to a particular research question, topic area or phenomenon of interest [6]. SLR is evidence based and has been used extensively by many researchers in other domains.
Systematic Mapping (SM) [7] is a variant of SLR which provides a well-defined structure for any area of research, by categorizing articles in that domain in a way that gives a visual summary or pictorial map of the area. According to [8] the main goals of SM are to provide an overview of a research area and also identify the quantity, type of research and results available within it. A secondary goal can be to identify the forums in which research in the area has been published.
Research Questions.
The concept of VPP is found to be relatively new, therefore publications in this area are highly dispersed in terms content and organization. To establish a good synergy and a better synthesis of the area, five guiding research questions are developed to help define the scope of the survey. The research questions are as follow:
-
Research question 1: What are the key drivers or motivation for collaboration in the domain of VPPs? [Seeking to identify motivation for collaborations]
-
Research question 2: Which collaborative organizations are emerging in the domain of VPPs? [Seeking to identify organizational forms]
-
Research question 3: Which collaborative principles are being applied in the emerging collaboration forms? [Seeking to identify CN principles]
-
Research question 4: Which technological elements support collaboration in VPPs? [Seeking to identify collaborative technological]
-
Research question 5: Who are the key players, agents or systems that participate in these collaborations? [Seeking to identity key players in the collaborations]
4 Focus Areas
4.1 VPP Aggregation
VPP aggregation is the process of collecting and merging capacities of diverse dispatchable and non-dispatchable DERs, energy storage systems, which may include electric vehicles, controllable loads and demand response programs, etc., to create a composite VPP, which capacity, characteristics and functions are equivalent to a physical power plant. The aggregation method is expected to ultimately impact on the performance and operation of the VPP, hence various approaches proposed by different researchers. Table 1 below summarizes the findings under VPP aggregation with emphasis on motivation for collaboration, collaborative principles that were observed, collaborative forms that were seen, and key players involved in the collaboration.
4.2 VPP Architecture and Infrastructure
VPP architecture and infrastructure covers articles that make contributions to VPP architecture and associated infrastructural support. General software and hardware architecture of power systems and related ICT infrastructure are also considered. In Table 2, a summary of VPP architecture and infrastructure in the context of collaborative technology, collaborative infrastructure, motivation for collaborations and key collaborative players are also analyzed and presented.
4.3 VPP Management
VPP management is the process of organizing and coordinating all resources and activities within the VPP to optimize generation, transmission, and distribution of energy. VPP management results in cost and loss minimization and ultimately maximizes profit. In this work, the authors considered publications that made contributions to various aspects of VPP management. In this focus area, VPP managerial techniques as well as collaborative principles were analyzed. Additionally, motivation for collaborations and key collaborative players/systems were also reviewed. Table 3 present the findings under this focus area.
4.4 VPP Market
The core objective of VPPs is to enable DERs participation in the energy market. The energy market is a trading system that enables purchases, through bids for buying or selling, or through offers and short-term trades, generally in the form of financial or obligation swaps. Bids and offers use supply and demand principles to set the prices. In this work, the authors considered publications that covered tariffs, remunerations and negotiations within the VPP market. The focus here was to identify collaborative technology and collaborative principles within the VPP market.
4.5 VPP Security
VPP networks are supported extensively by ICT infrastructure which are deployed to enable wide area monitoring, protection, and control of the grid. With this kind of integration, the traditional power system is gradually evolving into a cyber-physical entity that is constituted of distributed smart devices which will eventually subject the power grid to cyber related attacks. VPP security therefore a very critical components future grid. Under this section (Table 5), the authors considered collaborative technologies, motivation for collaboration and key collaborative players under VPP security.
4.6 VPP Policy and Roadmaps
Under this section, the authors considered short-term and long-term policy documents that support plans intended to guide the development of technologies that will enhance communication and collaborative technologies in the smart grid (SG).
5 Conclusions
The following general remarks can be made based on the outcome of the survey
-
(a)
Various CN organizational forms, principles, concepts and technology have significant level of penetration within the VPP concept.
-
(b)
VPPs are found to form various strategic and dynamic collaborative alliances which are similar to various CN organizational forms.
-
(c)
Prospects for new and hybrid collaborative forms and mechanisms are very high within VPP energy ecosystem.
-
(d)
The two communities were found to use different languages or terminologies although referring to similar concepts. For instance, in the VPP domain, the process of accumulating DERs is called “aggregation”. However, a similar process in the domain of CNs is referred to as a “VO creation”. Another process in CNs called “partner search and selection process” occurs in the VPP domain, however, this process is named differently and adopts different functional approach. Some examples include the Common Active Registry [9] and Virtual DER Clustering Aggregator [10, 11]. This suggests the need for the two communities to engage in further interactions to develop inter-disciplinary knowledge-base.
-
(e)
The discipline of CN constitutes a matured, well defined and clearly structured body of knowledge in various aspects of collaborations across diverse disciplines. By adopting CN body of knowledge within the VPP collaborative environment, the VPP concept and its associated technologies can greatly be enhanced. A merge between these two disciplines could forge a clear niche for a collaborative VPP ecosystem which is agile and highly resilient.
References
Kramer, O., Satzger, B., Lässig, J.: Managing energy in a virtual power plant using learning classifier systems. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Methods, GEM, pp. 111–117 (2010)
Lyberopoulos, G., Theodoropoulou, E., Mesogiti, I., Makris, P., Varvarigos, E.: A highly-dynamic and distributed operational framework for smart energy networks. In: 2014 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks, CAMAD, pp. 120–124 (2014)
Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: On reference models for collaborative networked organizations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 46(9), 2453–2469 (2008)
Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. TR/SE-0401, NICTA Technical Report 0400011T.1 (2004). http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~weippl/systemicReviewsSoftwareEngineering.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., Mattsson, M.: Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2008, vol. 17, pp. 68–77 (2008)
Dethlefs, T., Preisler, T., Renz, W., Hamburg, H.A.W., Tor, B.: A DER registry system as an infrastructural component for future smart grid applications. In: Proceedings of International ETG Congress, Die Energiewende - Blueprints for the New Energy Age, pp. 93–99 (2015)
Botsis, V., Doulamis, N., Doulamis, A., Makris, P., Varvarigos, E.: Efficient clustering of DERs in a virtual association for profit optimization. In: Proceedings - 18th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design, DSD, pp. 494–501 (2015)
Rinaldi, S., Pasetti, M., Ferrari, P., Massa, G., Della Giustina, D., Unareti, S.A.: Experimental characterization of communication infrastructure for virtual power plant monitoring. In: 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS), pp. 1–6 (2016)
Huang, Y., Warnier, M., Brazier, F., Miorandi, D.: Social networking for smart grid users. A preliminary modeling and simulation study. In: IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, pp. 438–443 (2015)
Biswas, S., Bagchi, D., Narahari, Y.: Mechanism design for sustainable virtual power plant formation. In: IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, pp. 67–72 (2014)
Siebert, N., et al.: Reflexe: managing commercial and industrial flexibilities in a market environment. In: IEEE Grenoble Conference PowerTech, POWERTECH, pp. 1–6 (2013)
Baeyens, E., Bitar, E.Y., Khargonekar, P.P., Poolla, K.: Wind energy aggregation: a coalitional game approach. In: Proceedings of 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference, pp. 3000–3007 (2011)
El Bakari, K., Kling, W.L.: Development and operation of virtual power plant system. In: 2011 2nd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT Europe), pp. 1–5 (2011)
Bakari, K.E., Kling, W.L.: Fitting distributed generation in future power markets through virtual power plants. In: 2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market, pp. 1–7 (2012)
Han, X., Bindner, H.W., Mehmedalic, J., Tackie, D.V.: Hybrid control scheme for distributed energy resource management in a market context. In: 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–5 (2015)
Kamphuis, R., Wijbenga, J.P., Van Der Veen, J.S., Macdougall, P., Faeth, M.: DREAM: an ICT architecture framework for heterarchical coordination in power systems. In: 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech, POWERTECH, pp. 1–4 (2015)
Messinis, G., Dimeas, A., Hatziargyriou, N., Kokos, I., Lamprinos, I.: ICT tools for enabling smart grid players’ flexibility through VPP and DR services. In: 2016 13th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), pp. 1–5 (2016)
Hernandez, L., et al.: A multi-agent system architecture for smart grid management and forecasting of energy demand in virtual power plants. IEEE Commu. Mag. 51(1), 106–113 (2013)
Raju, L., Appaswamy, K., Vengatraman, J., Morais, A.A.: Advanced energy management in virtual power plant using multi agent system. In: 3rd International Conference on Electrical Energy Systems (ICEES), pp. 133–138 (2016)
Oliveira, P., Pinto, T., Morais, H.: MASGriP—a multi-agent smart grid simulation platform. In: Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–8 (2012)
Vale, Z.A., Morais, H., Khodr, H.: Intelligent multi-player smart grid management considering distributed energy resources and demand response. In: 2010 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–7 (2010)
Zehir, M.A., Bagriyanik, M.: Smart energy aggregation network (SEAN): an advanced management system for using distributed energy resources in virtual power plant applications. In: 3rd International Istanbul Smart Grid Congress and Fair, ICSG 2015, pp. 1–4 (2015)
Fu, H., Wu, Z., Li, J., Zhang, X.: A configurable µVPP with managed energy services: a malmo western harbour case. IEEE Power Energy Technol. Syst. J. 3(4), 166–178 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPETS.2016.2596779
Brenna, M., Falvo, M.C., Foiadelli, F., Martirano, L., Poli, D.: From virtual power plant (VPP) to sustainable energy microsystem (SEM): an opportunity for buildings energy management. In: 2015 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, vol. 6, pp. 1–8 (2015)
Dagdougui, H., Ouammi, A., Sacile, R.: Distributed optimal control of a network of virtual power plants with dynamic price mechanism. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference, SysCon, pp. 24–29 (2014)
Morais, H., Pinto, T., Vale, Z., Praça, I.: Multilevel negotiation in smart grids for VPP management of distributed resources. IEEE Intell. Syst. 27(6), 8–16 (2012)
Capodieci, N., Cabri, G.: Managing deregulated energy markets: an adaptive and autonomous multi-agent system application. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2013, pp. 758–763 (2013)
Spínola, J., Faria, P., Vale, Z.: Remuneration of distributed generation and demand response resources considering scheduling and aggregation. In: IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–5 (2015)
Faria, P., João, S., Vale, Z.: Aggregation and remuneration of electricity consumers and producers for the definition of demand-response programs. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 12(3), 952–961 (2016)
Rahimiyan, M., Baringo, L.M.: Strategic bidding for a virtual power plant in the day-ahead and real-time markets: a price-taker robust optimization approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(4), 2676–2687 (2016)
Ribeiro, C., Pinto, T., Vale, Z.: Remuneration and tariffs in the context of virtual power players. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 308–312 (2012)
Ribeiro, C., Pinto, T., Morais, H., Vale, Z., Santos, G.: Intelligent remuneration and tariffs for virtual power players. In: 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference PowerTech Towards Carbon Free Society Through Smarter Grids, POWERTECH, pp. 308–312 (2013)
Santos, G., Pinto, T., Vale, Z., Morais, H., Praca, I.: Balancing market integration in MASCEM electricity market simulator. In: Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–8 (2012)
Enose, N.: Implementing an integrated security management framework to ensure a secure smart grid. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, ICACCI, pp. 778–784 (2014)
Farag, M.M., Azab, M., Mokhtar, B.: Cross-layer security framework for smart grid: physical security layer. In: IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Europe, pp. 1–7 (2014)
Hittini, H., Abdrabou, A., Zhang, L.: SADSA: security aware distribution system architecture for smart grid applications. In: Proceedings of the 2016 12th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, IIT, pp. 1–6 (2016)
Sedjelmaci, H., Senouci, S.M.: Smart grid security: a new approach to detect intruders in a smart grid neighborhood area network. In: 2016 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM), pp. 6–11 (2016)
Liu, Y., Xin, H., Qu, Z., Gan, D.: An attack-resilient cooperative control strategy of multiple distributed generators in distribution networks. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7(6), 2923–2932 (2016)
Qi, J., Hahn, A., Lu, X., Wang, J., Liu, C.: Cybersecurity for distributed energy resources and smart inverters. IET Cyber-Physical Syst. Theory Appl. 1(1), 28–39 (2016)
Aydeger, A., Akkaya, K., Cintuglu, M.H., Uluagac, A.S., Mohammed, O.: Software defined networking for resilient communications in smart grid active distribution networks. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6 (2016)
Egbue, O., Naidu, D., Peterson, P.: The role of microgrids in enhancing macrogrid resilience. In: 2016 International Conference on Smart Grid and Clean Energy Technologies (ICSGCE), pp. 125–129 (2016)
Line, M.B., Tøndel, I.A., Jaatun, M.G.: Cyber security challenges in smart grids. In: 2011 2nd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT Europe), pp. 5–7 (2011)
Cowan, K.R., Daim, T.U.: Integrated technology roadmap development process: creating smart grid roadmaps to meet regional technology planning needs in oregon and the pacific northwest. In: Proceedings of PICMET 2012: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, pp. 2871–2885 (2012)
Hahn, A., Govindarasu, M.: Cyber vulnerability disclosure policies for the smart grid. In: 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1–5 (2012)
Danekas, C.: Deriving business requirements from technology roadmaps to support ICT-architecture management. In: 2012 International Conference on Smart Grid Technology (SG-TEP), Economics and Policies, no. Section II, pp. 1–4 (2012)
Kilbourne, B., Bender, K.: Spectrum for smart grid: Policy recommendations enabling current and future applications. In: 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, pp. 578–582 (2010)
Kim, J., Park, H.-I.: Policy directions for the smart grid in Korea. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 9(1), 40–49 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2010.939166
Acknowledgement
This work was funded in part by the Center of Technology and Systems of Uninova and the Portuguese FCT-PEST program UID/EEA/00066/2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Adu-Kankam, K.O., Camarinha-Matos, L.M. (2018). Towards Collaborative Virtual Power Plants. In: Camarinha-Matos, L., Adu-Kankam, K., Julashokri, M. (eds) Technological Innovation for Resilient Systems. DoCEIS 2018. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 521. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78574-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78574-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78573-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78574-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)