Skip to main content

Our Progeny’s Monsters: Frankenstein Retold for Children in Picturebooks and Graphic Novels

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Frankenstein

Part of the book series: Studies in Global Science Fiction ((SGSF))

Abstract

Frankenstein is surprisingly well suited to stories aimed at children and is often adapted for young readerships. This chapter explores why, through a focus on graphic narratives. I examine five books: picturebooks Do Not Build a Frankenstein! by Neil Numberman (HarperCollins, New York, 2009) and The Monsters’ Monster by Patrick McDonnell (Little, Brown and Company, New York, 2012), graphic novels by Chris Mould (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997) and Marion Mousse (Papercutz, New York, 2009), both titled Frankenstein, and Margrete Lamond and Drahoš Zak’s illustrated novel adaptation, Frankenstein (HarperCollins, Sydney, 2005). These texts adapt Shelley’s plot or offer new stories based (sometimes loosely) on her novel’s characters and tropes, creatively exploiting pre-existing knowledge of the story and its iconography. The narratives’ complexities emerge through the interplay between pictures and words, both demanding and enabling active reading strategies by young (and adult) readers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a chronology of Frankenstein’s translations, see Romantic Circles https://www.rc.umd.edu/editions/frankenstein/textual

  2. 2.

    Coats and Sands (2016) examine Frankenstein’s adaptations in Young Adult (YA) fiction and texts for young child readers. Two recent collections on the Gothic in children’s literature , Jackson et al. (2008) and Jackson (2017), touch only tangentially on Frankenstein.

  3. 3.

    On advances from the fidelity debate, see Hutcheon and O’Flynn (2013).

  4. 4.

    On the history of children’s literature including constructions of childhood, see also Carpenter (1987).

  5. 5.

    For distinctions and relationships between adaptation and appropriation, see Sanders (2016) and Hutcheon and O’Flynn (2013).

  6. 6.

    For discussions of postmodern devices in picturebooks, see Sipe and Pantaleo (2008).

  7. 7.

    See Beauvais (2015) for a discussion of gaps in comics and picturebooks and of studies of how child readers interpret them.

Works Cited

  • Arizpe, Evelyn, and Morag Styles. 2003. Children Reading Pictures: Interpreting Visual Texts. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldick, Chris. 1987. In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvais, Clementine. 2015. What’s in “the Gap”? A Glance Down the Central Concept of Picturebook Theory. Nordic Journal of ChildLit Aesthetics 6: 26969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Sandra. 2012. Crossover Picturebooks: A Genre for All Ages. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchbinder, David. 2011. ‘From “Wizard” to “Wicked’”: Adaptation Theory and Young Adult Fiction. In Contemporary Children’s Literature and Film: Engaging with Theory, ed. Kerry Mallan and Clare Bradford, 12–35. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Humphrey. 1987. Secret Gardens: The Golden Age of Children’s Literature. London: Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, Karen, and Farran Norris Sands. 2016. Growing Up Frankenstein: Adaptations for Young Readers. In The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein, ed. Andrew Smith, 241–255. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, Julie. 2008. Frightening and Funny: Humour in Children’s Gothic Fiction. In The Gothic in Children’s Literature: Haunting the Borders, ed. Anna Jackson, Karen Coats, and Roderick McGillis, 57–76. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, Teresa, and Emma Bosch. 2011. Before and After the Picturebook Frame: A Typology of Endpapers. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship 17 (2): 122–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, Audrey A. 2009. Frankenstein: Icon of Modern Culture. Hastings: Helm Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, Gérard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Trans: J.E. Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, Erin. 2015. “Children Should Play with Dead Things”: Transforming Frankenstein in Tim Burton’s Frankenweenie. Refractory: A Journal of Media Entertainment 26. http://refractory.unimelb.edu.au/2015/10/07/hawley/

  • Hitchcock, Susan. 2007. Frankenstein: A Cultural History. London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, Robert. 2014. Frankenstein. London: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda with Siobhan O’Flynn. 2013. A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Anna, ed. 2017. New Directions in Gothic Children’s Literature: Debatable Lands. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Anna, Karen Coats, and Roderick McGillis, eds. 2008. Introduction. In The Gothic in Children’s Literature: Haunting the Borders, 1–14. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, Barbara. 2011. What Is a Picturebook? Across the Borders of History. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship 17 (2): 86–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamond, Margrete, and Drahoš Zak. 2005. Frankenstein. Sydney: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 2001. Reading Contemporary Picturebooks: Picturing Text. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloud, Scott. 1994. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: HarperPerennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, Patrick. 2012. The Monsters’ Monster. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Claudia, and Jacqui Reid-Walsh. 2002. Researching Children’s Popular Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mould, Chris. 1997. Frankenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousse, Marion. 2009. Frankenstein. Trans: J. Johnson. New York: Papercutz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Anja. 2014. Introduction: Adapting Canonical Texts in and for Children’s Literature. In Adapting Canonical Texts in Children’s Literature, ed. Anja Müller, 1–8. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Christopher. 2016. Frankenstein in Comics and Graphic Novels. In The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein, ed. Andrew Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolajeva, Maria, and Carole Scott. 2000. The Dynamics of Picturebook Communication. Children’s Literature in Education 31 (4): 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. How Picturebooks Work. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nodelman, Perry. 1988. Words about Pictures: The Narrative Art of Children’s Picture Books. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numberman, Neil. 2009. Do Not Build a Frankenstein! New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, Claire, J.R. Martin, and Len Unsworth. 2013. Reading Visual Narratives: Image Analysis of Children’s Picturebooks. Sheffield: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Julie. 2016. Adaptation and Appropriation. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafini, Frank. 2010. Reading Multimodal Texts: Perceptual, Structural and Ideological Perspectives. Children’s Literature in Education 41 (2): 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, Lawrence, and Caroline McGuire. 2006. Picturebook Endpapers: Resources for Literary and Aesthetic Interpretation. Children’s Literature in Education 37 (4): 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, Lawrence, and Sylvia Pantaleo. 2008. Postmodern Picturebooks: Play, Parody, and Self-Referentiality. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Sarah J. 2005. Children, Cinema and Censorship: From Dracula to the Dead End Kids. New York: I. B. Taurus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, John. 2011. Schemas and Scripts: Cognitive Instruments and the Representation of Cultural Diversity in Children’s Literature. In Contemporary Children’s Literature and Film: Engaging with Theory, ed. Kerry Mallan and Clare Bradford, 12–35. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, Dale. 2008. The Haunted Nursery: 1764–1830. In The Gothic in Children’s Literature: Haunting the Borders, ed. Anna Jackson, Karen Coats, and Roderick McGillis, 15–38. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alder, E. (2018). Our Progeny’s Monsters: Frankenstein Retold for Children in Picturebooks and Graphic Novels. In: Davison, C., Mulvey-Roberts, M. (eds) Global Frankenstein. Studies in Global Science Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78142-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics