Abstract
When individuals in a society have different preferences over the options available to the society, how should social decisions be taken so as to achieve a reasonable compromise? What are the principles that one should use in one’s ethical evaluation of different states of the society? These ethical issues are at the centre of the theory of social choice and welfare. While they have been discussed and debated for centuries, what the modern theory of social choice and welfare has done is to bring to bear formal reasoning in exploring them. The literature that has developed in this area over the last 70 years or so is vast and it is not possible to give in this short review even a list of the major developments. What I seek to do here is to focus on a few of the most conspicuous landmarks in this literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This ethical position has been called “welfarism”, which may not be an entirely felicitous term. Note that one can define welfarism more formally, but it is not necessary for my purpose here.
- 2.
Recall that in defining BRR, we have assumed that only linear individual orderings are permissible.
- 3.
Nitzan and Rubinstein [10], however, allow individual preferences to be non-transitive.
- 4.
Recommended readings are indicated by asterisks before the names of the authors.
References
Recommended readings are indicated by asterisks before the names of the authors.
* Arrow, K. J. (1951, 1963). Social choice and individual values (1st ed., 1951; 2nd ed., 1963). New York: Wiley.
Bergson, A. (1954). On the concept of social welfare. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, 233–252.
Broome, J. (2009). Why Economics Needs Ethical Theory. In K. Basu & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Arguments for a Better World (pp. 7–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Borda, J.-C. (1781). “Mémoire sur les Élections au Scrutin”, Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, translated by Alfred de Grazia as “Mathematical derivation of an election system”, Isis 44, Parts 1 &2, 1953 (pp. 42–51).
de Condorcet, M. (1785) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse a la probabilite des decisions rendues a la pluralite des voix. Paris.
Gaertner, W., P. K. Pattanaik, and K. Suzumura (1992), “Individual rights revisited”, Economica 59, 1152–69.
Gärdenfors, P. (1981). Rights, games and social choice. Noûs, 15, 341–356.
* Little, I.M.D. (1952), “Social choice and individual values”, Journal of Political Economy 60, 422–432.
* May, K. O. (1952). A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica, 20, 680–684.
Nitzan, S., & Rubinstein, A. (1981). A further characterization of Borda ranking method. Public Choice, 36, 153–158.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.
Plott, C. R. (1976). Axiomatic social choice theory. American Journal of Political Science, 20, 511–596.
* Sen, A. K. (1970). The impossibility of a Paretian Liberal. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 152–157.
Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden Day.
Sen, A. K. (1977). Social choice theory: A re-examination. Econometrica, 45, 53–89.
Sugden, R. (1985). Liberty, preference, and choice. Economics and Philosophy, 1, 213–229.
* Young, H. P. (1974). An axiomatization of Borda’s rule. Journal of Economic Theory, 9, 43–52.
* Young, H. P. (1988). Condorcet’s theory of voting. American Political Science Review, 82, 1231–1244.
Young, H. P. (1997) Group choice and individual judgments. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice (pp. 181–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pattanaik, P.K. (2018). Social Choice and Voting. In: Hansson, S., Hendricks, V. (eds) Introduction to Formal Philosophy. Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77433-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77434-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)