Abstract
Creativity emerges from the individual or collective intellect, in order to unfold the conundrum of life and give rise to meaningful deliberations for the attainment of a flourishing life. More specifically, creativity is commonly defined, within the framework of psychology, as an act or product that shall fulfill three main criteria: originality, unexpectedness, and usefulness. The cognitive science approach to creativity investigates the intellectual processes and representations concerned with the creative thinking. The methodologies of cognitive science, derived from the technological advancements of the past sixty years, have begun to adopt a more definitive and systemic perspective. Neuroscience has emerged, under this context, as the scientific study dedicated to explore the biological substrates of the nervous system, by utilizing a multitude of techniques such as neuroimaging. Cognitive neuroscience, in particular, studies the neural correlates of mental processes, and it constitutes the central approach herein adopted to examine musical creativity as a product of the human mind. In the present section, a definition plus historical evolvement of creativity are firstly provided together with an overview of its developments in psychometry. Secondly, a comprehensive description regarding the scientific advances about the topic, and within the field of cognitive neuroscience, is described according to: (1) the model on the four types of creativity and (2) the main categories of experimental designs implemented so far. Lastly, the latest advancements on the study of musical creativity, in particular musical improvisation, will be addressed under the neuroimaging framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
These attributes were not necessarily pejorative. They might be constructive as well as destructive.
- 2.
This idea was recovered, during nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, to name eccentric and erratic behaviors.
- 3.
- 4.
In agreement with the Investment Theory of Creativity (Sternberg and Lubart 1999, p. 11).
- 5.
Historiometric methods are drawn upon quantitative data extracted mostly from historical documents.
- 6.
Interestingly, it was shown that notable scientists are more likely to be firstborns than creative writers.
- 7.
A corollary of this statement is that the few individuals, who demonstrate outstanding capacities, use cognitive processes very different from those employed by the majority of the people and, thus, methods of cognitive science are not suffice to characterize such processes (Hershman and Lieb 1988).
- 8.
Willed actions can be described as self-generated behaviors, involving: (i) attention and conscious awareness; (ii) choice and control, and (iii) intentionality (Jahanshahi and Frith 1998). They thus fall within the class of behavioral models, which are pointed to be part of the creative act.
- 9.
We often assume that if we don’t notice our thoughts they don’t exist, (…) When we don’t notice them is when we may be thinking most creatively.”—Dr. Kalina Christoff, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Hotz 2009).
- 10.
- 11.
Alpha waves (8–13 Hz) occur while awake, under relaxation and with eyes closed.
- 12.
The tests of creativity used in this study were the Alternate Uses Test and the Remote Associates Test.
- 13.
Brick Test.
- 14.
Master of Fine Arts.
- 15.
Delta waves (0.5–5 Hz) occur during sleep.
- 16.
Beta waves (13–30 Hz) occur due to increased alertness and focused attention.
- 17.
Gamma waves (>30 Hz) are presumably implicated in creating the unity of conscious perception.
- 18.
Alternative Uses Test.
- 19.
Close to the temporoparietal junction.
- 20.
Heinrich Schenker theorized on the model of the two levels of musical formulas (or musical schemata, i.e., the archetypal patterns which define a musical style (Gjerdingen 1988, 2007)). Such model attempts to describe the structural basis of tonal improvisation. The first level relates to bass lines and their harmonic progressions (harmonic progressions can be defined as musical treatises presented in a systematic, simplified, and stylistic neutral fashion, such as a block of chords), whereas the second consists on perceiving such harmonic progressions idiomatically, i.e., through the use of melodic figures (Rink 1993). Pressing (1984) denominates the first level as referent. The referent is thus a structure of events in which improvisation can be crafted. Also, and according to Pressing’s terminology, the second level represents the knowledge used to build the “musical surface” of the underlying referent. From the cognitive perspective, the referent allows for the internalization of certain features in musical language, so that they can be conceived with some degree of automaticity. On the other hand, conscious attention mechanisms regulate decision-making cognition on higher-level musical processes (e.g., relationships between events, form, and feel).
- 21.
- 22.
The presupplementary motor area was also significant activity in the main effect of melodic improvisation.
- 23.
- 24.
The Musical Improvisation Questionnaire (Lopata et al. 2017) was used to assess the improvised performances. Qualified judges were asked to rate the records according to criteria which provide benchmarks for discriminant validity testing, such as technique or aesthetical appeal. This questionnaire was developed based on The Consensual Assessment Technique (Amabile 1982), which takes a broad definition of creativity to include aspects related to both performance and outcomes. By this way, the final scores are intended to translate the overall value of the creative behavior.
References
Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1999). History of research on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 16–31). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, USA: Springer.
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Huang, C., & Buckner, R. L. (2010). Evidence for the default network’s role in spontaneous cognition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 322–335.
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W. Y., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1117–1122.
Beaty, R. E. (2015). The neuroscience of musical improvisation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 108–117.
Bengtsson, S. L., Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Ullén, F. (2007). Cortical regions involved in the generation of musical structures during improvisation in pianists. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 830–842.
Bengtsson, S. L., Ehrsson, H. H., Forssberg, H., & Ullén, F. (2004). Dissociating brain regions controlling the temporal and ordinal structure of learned movement sequences. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(9), 2591–2602.
Berkowitz, A. L. (2010). The improvising mind: Cognition and creativity in the musical moment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Berkowitz, A. L., & Ansari, D. (2008). Generation of novel motor sequences: The neural correlates of musical improvisation. Neuroimage, 41(2), 535–543.
Berkowitz, A. L., & Ansari, D. (2010). Expertise-related deactivation of the right temporoparietal junction during musical improvisation. Neuroimage, 49(1), 712–719.
Bhattacharya, J., & Petsche, H. (2005). Drawing on mind’s canvas: Differences in cortical integration patterns between artists and non-artists. Human Brain Mapping, 26(1), 1–14.
Boorstin, D. J. (1992). The creators: A history of heroes of the imagination. New York: Random House.
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38.
Carlsson, I. (2014). Biological and neuropsychological aspects of creativity. In E. Shiu (Ed.), Creativity research: An inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary research handbook (Vol. 34) Routledge studies in innovation, organizations and technology. Routledge.
Carlsson, I., Wendt, P. E., & Risberg, J. (2000). On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38(6), 873–885.
Chávez-Eakle, R. A. (2007). Creativity, DNA, and cerebral blood flow. In C. Martindale, P. Locher, & V. M. Petrov (Eds.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity and the arts, foundations and frontiers in aesthetics series. Amityville, New York: Baywood Publishing Company Inc.
Csikszentmihályi, M. (1988). Society, culture and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, Part III The role of the individual-environment interaction in creativity, The study of creative systems (pp. 325–339). Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.
de Manzano, Ö. (2010). Biological mechanisms in creativity and flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Karolinska Institutet.
de Manzano, Ö., & Ullén, F. (2012a). Activation and connectivity patterns of the presupplementary and dorsal premotor areas during free improvisation of melodies and rhythms. Neuroimage, 63(1), 272–280.
de Manzano, Ö., & Ullén, F. (2012b). Goal-independent mechanisms for free response generation: Creative and pseudo-random performance share neural substrates. Neuroimage, 59(1), 772–780.
Deiber, M.-P., Passingham, R. E., Colebatch, J. G., Friston, K. J., Nixon, P. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991). Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography. Experimental Brain Research, 84(2), 393–402.
Desmond, J. E., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Glover, G. H. (1998). Dissociation of frontal and cerebellar activity in a cognitive task: Evidence for a distinction between selection and search. Neuroimage, 7(4 Pt 1), 368–376.
Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(6), 1011–1026.
Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822–848.
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 35–47.
Donnay, G. F., Rankin, S. K., Lopez-Gonzalez, M., Jiradejvong, P., & Limb, C. J. (2014). Neural substrates of interactive musical improvisation: an fMRI study of ‘trading fours’ in jazz. PLoS One, 9(2), e88665.
Doyon, J., & Benali, H. (2005). Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 161–167.
Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994.
Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity, chapter Section II: Diverse perspectives on creativity (pp. 113–130). Cambridge University Press.
Fink, A., Graif, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2009). Brain correlates underlying creative thinking: EEG alpha activity in professional vs. novice dancers. Neuroimage, 46(3), 854–862.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997). Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 6(3), 218–229.
Frith, C. (2000). The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the selection of action as revealed by functional imaging. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes, attention and performance XVIII (pp. 549–566). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fuster, J. M. (2000a). Executive frontal functions. Experimental Brain Research, 133(1), 66–70.
Fuster, J. M. (2000b). The prefrontal cortex of the primate: A synopsis. Psychobiology, 28(2), 125–131.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: BasicBooks.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513–524.
Gjerdingen, R. (1988). A classic turn of phrase: Music and the psychology of convention. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gjerdingen, R. (2007). Music in the galant style. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gonen-Yaacovi, G., de Souza, L., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013). Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta-analysis of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 465.
Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1974).
Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.
Gruber, H. E., & Davis, S. N. (1988). Inching our way up mount olympus: The evolving-systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, Part III: The role of the individual-environment interaction in creativity, The study of creative lives (pp. 243–270). Cambridge University Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hadamard, J. (1945). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hershman, D. J., & Lieb, J. (1988). The key to genius. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Hotz, R. L. (2009). A wandering mind heads straight toward insight. The Wall Street Journal, A11.
Jahanshahi, M., Dirnberger, G., Fuller, R., & Frith, C. D. (2000). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in random number generation: A study with positron emission tomography. Neuroimage, 12(6), 713–725.
Jahanshahi, M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Willed actions and its impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15(6–8), 483–533.
Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., Reber, P. J., & Kounios, J. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2(4), 0500–0510.
Keenan, J. P., Wheeler, M. A., Gallup, G. G. Jr, & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 338–44.
Lau, H. C., Rogers, R. D., Ramnani, N., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). Willed action and attention to the selection of action. Neuroimage, 21(4), 1407–1415.
Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: and fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS One, 3(2), e1679.
Liu, S., Chow, H. M., Xu, Y., Erkkinen, M. G., Swett, K. E., Eagle, M. W., et al. (2012). Neural correlates of lyrical improvisation: An fMRI study of freestyle rap. Scientific Reports, 2, 834.
Lopata, J. A., Nowicki, E. A., & Joanisse, M. F. (2017). Creativity as a distinct trainable mental state: An EEG study of musical improvisation. Neuropsychologia, 99, 246–258.
Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Maduro, R. (1976). Artistic creativity in a Brahmin painter community. Research Monographs Series (Vol. 14). Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California.
Manson, M. F., Norton, M. I., Horn, J. D. V., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315(5810), 393–395.
Martindale, C., & Hines, D. (1975). Creativity and cortical activation during creative, intellectual and EEG feedback tasks. Biological Psychology, 3(2), 91–100.
Mihov, K. M., Denzler, M., & Förster, J. (2010). Hemispheric specialization and creative thinking: A meta-analytic review of lateralization of creativity. Brain and Cognition, 72(3), 442–448.
Nathaniel-James, D. A., & Frith, C. D. (2002). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: Evidence from the effects of contextual constraint in a sentence completion task. Neuroimage, 16(4), 1094–1102.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Pinho, A. L., de Manzano, Ö., Fransson, P., Eriksson, H., & Ullén, F. (2014). Connecting to create: Expertise in musical improvisation is associated with increased functional connectivity between premotor and prefrontal regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(18), 6156–6163.
Pinho, A. L., Ullén, F., Castelo-Branco, M., Fransson, P., & de Manzano, Ö. (2016). Addressing a paradox: Dual strategies for creative performance in introspective and extrospective networks. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 3052.
Playford, E. D., Jenkins, I. H., Passingham, R. E., Nutt, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Brooks, D. J. (1992). Impaired mesial frontal and putamen activation in Parkinson’s disease: A positron emisssion tomography study. Annals of Neurology, 32(2), 151–161.
Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Poincaré, H. (1921). The foundations of science. New York: Science Press.
Poldrack, R. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: Informatics and the search for mental structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 587–612.
Posner, M. I. (1994). Attention: The mechanisms of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 7398–7403.
Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53–66.
Pressing, J. (1984). Cognitive Processes in Improvisation. In W. R. Crozier & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive processes in the perception of art (pp. 346–347). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Pressing, J. (1988). Improvisation: Methods and models. In J. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 129–178). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ribot, T. A. (1921). Essay on the creative imagination. Chicago: Open Court.
Rink, J. (1993). Schenker and improvisation. Journal of Music Theory, 37(1), 1–54. (Summary of Heinrich Schenker’s ideas about improvisation).
Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor. Washington, DC: Inventors Publishing.
Saggar, M., Chromik, L. C., Royalty, A., Hawthorne, G., & Reiss, A. L. (2016). Developing novel neuroimaging paradigm to assess neural correlates of improvisation and creative thinking using fMRI. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research: Taking breakthrough innovation home (pp. 309–317). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Salvi, C., & Bowden, E. M. (2016). Looking for creativity: Where do we look when we look for new ideas? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 161.
Sawyer, K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 137–154.
Schubotz, R. I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Interval and ordinal properties of sequences are associated with distinct premotor areas. Cerebral Cortex, 11(3), 210–222.
Simonton, D. D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–32.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Stillings, N. A., Weisler, S. E., Chase, C. H., Feinstein, M. H., Garfield, J. L., & Rissland, E. L., (Eds.) (1998). Cognitive science: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tafuri, J. (2006). Processes and teaching strategies in musical improvisation with children. In I. Deliège, & G. A. Wiggins (Eds.), Musical creativity: Multidisciplinary research in theory and practice. Psychology Press.
Thagard, P. (2014). Cognitive science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happé, F., Falkai, P., et al. (2001). Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage, 14(1), 170–181.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Brace and Company, New York: Harcourt.
Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, X., Yang, W., Tong, D., Sun, J., Chen, Q., Wei, D., et al. (2015). A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Human Brain Mapping, 36(7), 2703–2718.
Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2016). The richness of inner experience: Relating styles of daydreaming to creative processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2063.
Acknowledgements
This chapter features an updated version of the first chapter included in the author’s Ph.D. Thesis with the following title: “Inside of the Creative Mind: Unravelling the Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Musical Creativity”. The author is thus thankful to all supervisors, in particular Fredrik Ullén and Örjan de Manzano, for their mentorship in the course of her doctoral studies on the present topic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinho, A.L. (2018). The Neuropsychological Aspects of Musical Creativity. In: Kapoula, Z., Volle, E., Renoult, J., Andreatta, M. (eds) Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76053-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76054-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)