Skip to main content

The Neuropsychological Aspects of Musical Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Sciences

Abstract

Creativity emerges from the individual or collective intellect, in order to unfold the conundrum of life and give rise to meaningful deliberations for the attainment of a flourishing life. More specifically, creativity is commonly defined, within the framework of psychology, as an act or product that shall fulfill three main criteria: originality, unexpectedness, and usefulness. The cognitive science approach to creativity investigates the intellectual processes and representations concerned with the creative thinking. The methodologies of cognitive science, derived from the technological advancements of the past sixty years, have begun to adopt a more definitive and systemic perspective. Neuroscience has emerged, under this context, as the scientific study dedicated to explore the biological substrates of the nervous system, by utilizing a multitude of techniques such as neuroimaging. Cognitive neuroscience, in particular, studies the neural correlates of mental processes, and it constitutes the central approach herein adopted to examine musical creativity as a product of the human mind. In the present section, a definition plus historical evolvement of creativity are firstly provided together with an overview of its developments in psychometry. Secondly, a comprehensive description regarding the scientific advances about the topic, and within the field of cognitive neuroscience, is described according to: (1) the model on the four types of creativity and (2) the main categories of experimental designs implemented so far. Lastly, the latest advancements on the study of musical creativity, in particular musical improvisation, will be addressed under the neuroimaging framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    These attributes were not necessarily pejorative. They might be constructive as well as destructive.

  2. 2.

    This idea was recovered, during nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, to name eccentric and erratic behaviors.

  3. 3.

    As stated by Boorstin (1992), Eastern traditions were in favor that “the idea of the creation of something ex nihilo (“from nothing”) had no place in a universe of the yin and yang.” (Boorstin (1992).

  4. 4.

    In agreement with the Investment Theory of Creativity (Sternberg and Lubart 1999, p. 11).

  5. 5.

    Historiometric methods are drawn upon quantitative data extracted mostly from historical documents.

  6. 6.

    Interestingly, it was shown that notable scientists are more likely to be firstborns than creative writers.

  7. 7.

    A corollary of this statement is that the few individuals, who demonstrate outstanding capacities, use cognitive processes very different from those employed by the majority of the people and, thus, methods of cognitive science are not suffice to characterize such processes (Hershman and Lieb 1988).

  8. 8.

    Willed actions can be described as self-generated behaviors, involving: (i) attention and conscious awareness; (ii) choice and control, and (iii) intentionality (Jahanshahi and Frith 1998). They thus fall within the class of behavioral models, which are pointed to be part of the creative act.

  9. 9.

    We often assume that if we don’t notice our thoughts they don’t exist, (…) When we don’t notice them is when we may be thinking most creatively.”—Dr. Kalina Christoff, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Hotz 2009).

  10. 10.

    Brain system active in resting state but typically reduced during active conditions (Buckner et al. 2008). Interestingly, it also exhibits less activity during unconscious states (Andrews-Hanna et al. 2010).

  11. 11.

    Alpha waves (8–13 Hz) occur while awake, under relaxation and with eyes closed.

  12. 12.

    The tests of creativity used in this study were the Alternate Uses Test and the Remote Associates Test.

  13. 13.

    Brick Test.

  14. 14.

    Master of Fine Arts.

  15. 15.

    Delta waves (0.5–5 Hz) occur during sleep.

  16. 16.

    Beta waves (13–30 Hz) occur due to increased alertness and focused attention.

  17. 17.

    Gamma waves (>30 Hz) are presumably implicated in creating the unity of conscious perception.

  18. 18.

    Alternative Uses Test.

  19. 19.

    Close to the temporoparietal junction.

  20. 20.

    Heinrich Schenker theorized on the model of the two levels of musical formulas (or musical schemata, i.e., the archetypal patterns which define a musical style (Gjerdingen 1988, 2007)). Such model attempts to describe the structural basis of tonal improvisation. The first level relates to bass lines and their harmonic progressions (harmonic progressions can be defined as musical treatises presented in a systematic, simplified, and stylistic neutral fashion, such as a block of chords), whereas the second consists on perceiving such harmonic progressions idiomatically, i.e., through the use of melodic figures (Rink 1993). Pressing (1984) denominates the first level as referent. The referent is thus a structure of events in which improvisation can be crafted. Also, and according to Pressing’s terminology, the second level represents the knowledge used to build the “musical surface” of the underlying referent. From the cognitive perspective, the referent allows for the internalization of certain features in musical language, so that they can be conceived with some degree of automaticity. On the other hand, conscious attention mechanisms regulate decision-making cognition on higher-level musical processes (e.g., relationships between events, form, and feel).

  21. 21.

    The MR-compatible piano keyboard was the same as the one used in the previous investigation by de Manzano and Ullén (2012b) (see Fig. 2).

  22. 22.

    The presupplementary motor area was also significant activity in the main effect of melodic improvisation.

  23. 23.

    The same equipment was used in previous investigations (see de Manzano and Ullén (2012a, b) and Fig. 2).

  24. 24.

    The Musical Improvisation Questionnaire (Lopata et al. 2017) was used to assess the improvised performances. Qualified judges were asked to rate the records according to criteria which provide benchmarks for discriminant validity testing, such as technique or aesthetical appeal. This questionnaire was developed based on The Consensual Assessment Technique (Amabile 1982), which takes a broad definition of creativity to include aspects related to both performance and outcomes. By this way, the final scores are intended to translate the overall value of the creative behavior.

References

  • Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1999). History of research on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 16–31). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, USA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Huang, C., & Buckner, R. L. (2010). Evidence for the default network’s role in spontaneous cognition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W. Y., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1117–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, R. E. (2015). The neuroscience of musical improvisation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, S. L., Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Ullén, F. (2007). Cortical regions involved in the generation of musical structures during improvisation in pianists. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 830–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, S. L., Ehrsson, H. H., Forssberg, H., & Ullén, F. (2004). Dissociating brain regions controlling the temporal and ordinal structure of learned movement sequences. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(9), 2591–2602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, A. L. (2010). The improvising mind: Cognition and creativity in the musical moment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, A. L., & Ansari, D. (2008). Generation of novel motor sequences: The neural correlates of musical improvisation. Neuroimage, 41(2), 535–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, A. L., & Ansari, D. (2010). Expertise-related deactivation of the right temporoparietal junction during musical improvisation. Neuroimage, 49(1), 712–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, J., & Petsche, H. (2005). Drawing on mind’s canvas: Differences in cortical integration patterns between artists and non-artists. Human Brain Mapping, 26(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorstin, D. J. (1992). The creators: A history of heroes of the imagination. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, I. (2014). Biological and neuropsychological aspects of creativity. In E. Shiu (Ed.), Creativity research: An inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary research handbook (Vol. 34) Routledge studies in innovation, organizations and technology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, I., Wendt, P. E., & Risberg, J. (2000). On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38(6), 873–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chávez-Eakle, R. A. (2007). Creativity, DNA, and cerebral blood flow. In C. Martindale, P. Locher, & V. M. Petrov (Eds.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity and the arts, foundations and frontiers in aesthetics series. Amityville, New York: Baywood Publishing Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihályi, M. (1988). Society, culture and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, Part III The role of the individual-environment interaction in creativity, The study of creative systems (pp. 325–339). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Manzano, Ö. (2010). Biological mechanisms in creativity and flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Karolinska Institutet.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Manzano, Ö., & Ullén, F. (2012a). Activation and connectivity patterns of the presupplementary and dorsal premotor areas during free improvisation of melodies and rhythms. Neuroimage, 63(1), 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Manzano, Ö., & Ullén, F. (2012b). Goal-independent mechanisms for free response generation: Creative and pseudo-random performance share neural substrates. Neuroimage, 59(1), 772–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deiber, M.-P., Passingham, R. E., Colebatch, J. G., Friston, K. J., Nixon, P. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991). Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography. Experimental Brain Research, 84(2), 393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, J. E., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Glover, G. H. (1998). Dissociation of frontal and cerebellar activity in a cognitive task: Evidence for a distinction between selection and search. Neuroimage, 7(4 Pt 1), 368–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(6), 1011–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnay, G. F., Rankin, S. K., Lopez-Gonzalez, M., Jiradejvong, P., & Limb, C. J. (2014). Neural substrates of interactive musical improvisation: an fMRI study of ‘trading fours’ in jazz. PLoS One, 9(2), e88665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyon, J., & Benali, H. (2005). Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity, chapter Section II: Diverse perspectives on creativity (pp. 113–130). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A., Graif, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2009). Brain correlates underlying creative thinking: EEG alpha activity in professional vs. novice dancers. Neuroimage, 46(3), 854–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997). Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 6(3), 218–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. (2000). The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the selection of action as revealed by functional imaging. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes, attention and performance XVIII (pp. 549–566). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuster, J. M. (2000a). Executive frontal functions. Experimental Brain Research, 133(1), 66–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuster, J. M. (2000b). The prefrontal cortex of the primate: A synopsis. Psychobiology, 28(2), 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjerdingen, R. (1988). A classic turn of phrase: Music and the psychology of convention. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerdingen, R. (2007). Music in the galant style. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonen-Yaacovi, G., de Souza, L., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013). Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta-analysis of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E., & Davis, S. N. (1988). Inching our way up mount olympus: The evolving-systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, Part III: The role of the individual-environment interaction in creativity, The study of creative lives (pp. 243–270). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. (1945). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershman, D. J., & Lieb, J. (1988). The key to genius. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotz, R. L. (2009). A wandering mind heads straight toward insight. The Wall Street Journal, A11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahi, M., Dirnberger, G., Fuller, R., & Frith, C. D. (2000). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in random number generation: A study with positron emission tomography. Neuroimage, 12(6), 713–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahi, M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Willed actions and its impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15(6–8), 483–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., Reber, P. J., & Kounios, J. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2(4), 0500–0510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P., Wheeler, M. A., Gallup, G. G. Jr, & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 338–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, H. C., Rogers, R. D., Ramnani, N., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). Willed action and attention to the selection of action. Neuroimage, 21(4), 1407–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: and fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS One, 3(2), e1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Chow, H. M., Xu, Y., Erkkinen, M. G., Swett, K. E., Eagle, M. W., et al. (2012). Neural correlates of lyrical improvisation: An fMRI study of freestyle rap. Scientific Reports, 2, 834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopata, J. A., Nowicki, E. A., & Joanisse, M. F. (2017). Creativity as a distinct trainable mental state: An EEG study of musical improvisation. Neuropsychologia, 99, 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maduro, R. (1976). Artistic creativity in a Brahmin painter community. Research Monographs Series (Vol. 14). Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, M. F., Norton, M. I., Horn, J. D. V., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315(5810), 393–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C., & Hines, D. (1975). Creativity and cortical activation during creative, intellectual and EEG feedback tasks. Biological Psychology, 3(2), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihov, K. M., Denzler, M., & Förster, J. (2010). Hemispheric specialization and creative thinking: A meta-analytic review of lateralization of creativity. Brain and Cognition, 72(3), 442–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel-James, D. A., & Frith, C. D. (2002). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: Evidence from the effects of contextual constraint in a sentence completion task. Neuroimage, 16(4), 1094–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinho, A. L., de Manzano, Ö., Fransson, P., Eriksson, H., & Ullén, F. (2014). Connecting to create: Expertise in musical improvisation is associated with increased functional connectivity between premotor and prefrontal regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(18), 6156–6163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinho, A. L., Ullén, F., Castelo-Branco, M., Fransson, P., & de Manzano, Ö. (2016). Addressing a paradox: Dual strategies for creative performance in introspective and extrospective networks. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 3052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Playford, E. D., Jenkins, I. H., Passingham, R. E., Nutt, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Brooks, D. J. (1992). Impaired mesial frontal and putamen activation in Parkinson’s disease: A positron emisssion tomography study. Annals of Neurology, 32(2), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1921). The foundations of science. New York: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: Informatics and the search for mental structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 587–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1994). Attention: The mechanisms of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 7398–7403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressing, J. (1984). Cognitive Processes in Improvisation. In W. R. Crozier & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive processes in the perception of art (pp. 346–347). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressing, J. (1988). Improvisation: Methods and models. In J. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 129–178). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, T. A. (1921). Essay on the creative imagination. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rink, J. (1993). Schenker and improvisation. Journal of Music Theory, 37(1), 1–54. (Summary of Heinrich Schenker’s ideas about improvisation).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor. Washington, DC: Inventors Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saggar, M., Chromik, L. C., Royalty, A., Hawthorne, G., & Reiss, A. L. (2016). Developing novel neuroimaging paradigm to assess neural correlates of improvisation and creative thinking using fMRI. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research: Taking breakthrough innovation home (pp. 309–317). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvi, C., & Bowden, E. M. (2016). Looking for creativity: Where do we look when we look for new ideas? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubotz, R. I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Interval and ordinal properties of sequences are associated with distinct premotor areas. Cerebral Cortex, 11(3), 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillings, N. A., Weisler, S. E., Chase, C. H., Feinstein, M. H., Garfield, J. L., & Rissland, E. L., (Eds.) (1998). Cognitive science: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafuri, J. (2006). Processes and teaching strategies in musical improvisation with children. In I. Deliège, & G. A. Wiggins (Eds.), Musical creativity: Multidisciplinary research in theory and practice. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (2014). Cognitive science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happé, F., Falkai, P., et al. (2001). Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage, 14(1), 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Brace and Company, New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Yang, W., Tong, D., Sun, J., Chen, Q., Wei, D., et al. (2015). A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Human Brain Mapping, 36(7), 2703–2718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2016). The richness of inner experience: Relating styles of daydreaming to creative processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter features an updated version of the first chapter included in the author’s Ph.D. Thesis with the following title: “Inside of the Creative Mind: Unravelling the Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Musical Creativity”. The author is thus thankful to all supervisors, in particular Fredrik Ullén and Örjan de Manzano, for their mentorship in the course of her doctoral studies on the present topic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Luísa Pinho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pinho, A.L. (2018). The Neuropsychological Aspects of Musical Creativity. In: Kapoula, Z., Volle, E., Renoult, J., Andreatta, M. (eds) Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics