Abstract
Pediatric regional analgesia is beneficial in postoperative pain management and is recognized as an important component in multi-modal analgesia regimens. In any perioperative plan of care, the risks and benefits of any technique lie with the skill and experience of the caregiver. This chapter provides an introduction to these techniques in providing postoperative analgesia to the pediatric patient.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Ultrasonography
- Topical analgesia
- Regional anesthetic blocks
- Head and neck
- Brachial plexus block
- Paravertebral block
- Transversus abdominis plane block
- Ilioinguinal
- Iliohypogastric block
- Penile nerve block
- Caudal block
- Caudal catheter extension into the lumbar or thoracic regions
Introduction
Since the original debate in the 1980s regarding the pros and cons of pediatric regional anesthesia [1, 2], safe and effective treatment of acute pain in children remains a high priority as clinical studies have shown pediatric patients experience pain from medical illnesses, during and following therapeutic and diagnostic procedures, and following trauma and surgery [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Although the safety profile of opiate administration in children has been established [12,13,14,15,16,17], elimination half-lives in newborns are longer with decreased metabolic clearances when compared to older children and adults [18, 19]. The optimal plasma concentrations for effective opiate analgesia are variable with careful titrations required to obtain effective analgesia while minimizing side effects [19,20,21,22,23].
Regional anesthesia has been shown to be beneficial when compared to general anesthesia. These benefits include reductions in morbidity and mortality [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], superior postoperative analgesia [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], and cost-effectiveness [39, 44,45,46,47,48]. There have been progressive developments in regional anesthetic techniques for the pediatric patient, since the original publications of the 1950s [49,50,51,52], but these techniques are still slow to be implemented due to concerns about neurologic complications, operator inexperience, and availability of proper equipment [53,54,55,56,57,58]. Many of these concerns were addressed in a sentinel article published in 1996, in a prospective study of greater than 24,000 pediatric blocks, inwhich 89% were performed under sedation or general anesthesia, with an incidence of 0.9/1000 complications and with no deaths nor long-term sequelae [33]. These findings were confirmed with subsequent studies [34, 35, 43, 59,60,61,62,63]. When properly performed, regional anesthesia is a safe, clinical practice with risk profiles similar to general anesthesia [34, 35, 43, 59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
Ultrasonography
All clinical techniques have an incidence of failure. Neurovascular anatomy is variable with subcutaneous electrical current stimulation techniques providing nerve localization with little to no information in proper placement of local anesthetics. Therefore, percutaneous techniques utilizing surface anatomy and projection, even in the best of hands, are fraught with failure [61, 68,69,70]. With the development of high-resolution portable ultrasound (US) analysis of anatomic relationships and observed real time spread of administered local anesthetics have made this modality feasible in the conduct of pediatric regional anesthesia [71,72,73,74,75]. To develop skill sets in the use of US for regional anesthesia, one should attend an US-guided regional anesthesia course, begin with simple blocks, then progress to more complicated procedures as experience develops [68, 70, 76,77,78,79].
Local Anesthetic Blocks
The technical expertise required in delivering regional anesthesia is tempered with concerns about producing neurologic complications, availability of proper equipment, costs and time limitations as to why regional anesthetic techniques are not utilized in the pediatric population [56,57,58, 68, 70, 76,77,78,79,80]. In children, most regional techniques require general anesthesia to provide a safe procedural environment [34, 76, 81]. With regard to selection of local anesthetics, the delivery site and the metabolic maturity of the child are also important considerations [82,83,84,85]. The introductions of the newer local anesthetics, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine, have similar pharmacokinetic profiles when compared to racemic bupivacaine, and are reported to be less cardiac toxic [84, 86,87,88], and are shown to be beneficial in children [86, 89,90,91]. Although local anesthetic toxicity is rare in children, reports of seizures, transient neuropathic symptoms, dysrhythmias, and cardiovascular collapse have been reported [85, 86, 90,91,92,93].
Topical Analgesia
As with adults, topical anesthesia is used to anesthetize the skin by local infiltration before intravenous catheter insertion or other minor procedures [94,95,96,97,98]. Likewise, local anesthetic infiltration is also employed to provide postoperative analgesia for incisional pain. Dosing guidelines are comparable to those guidelines for adults [99,100,101,102].
Early studies from the 1950s employed mixtures of tetracaine, adrenalin (epinephrine), and cocaine (TAC) in pediatric patients for repair of minor skin lacerations in emergency departments [103,104,105,106,107]. In a large-scale pediatric series, this form of anesthesia resulted in quicker surgical repair times, markedly improved patient acceptance, with wound complication rates not significantly different when compared to lidocaine subcutaneous infiltration. Subsequent studies confirmed these findings [104, 105, 107].
A eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream was developed in the 1980s that contains 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine [108]. This mixture results in an oil-water emulsification with a total local anesthetic concentration of 5% and has the ability to anesthetize intact skin to a depth of 5 mm [109, 110]. Recommended application is 45 min to 1 h before invasive procedures, with an occlusive dressing applied over the proposed procedural site. Because of EMLA’s potential for systemic toxicity, the cream should not be in prolonged contact with mucous membranes or with traumatized skin [111,112,113]. Common uses include anesthesia for venipuncture, neonatal circumcision, lumbar punctures, vaccinations, biopsies, and laser ablation of port wine stains [85, 114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125].
Another local anesthetic cream with a shorter onset of action (~30 min), ELA-Max is also available and is composed of 4% liposomal lidocaine [126]. One study by Eichenfield and colleagues observed comparable efficacy between ELA-Max at 30 min and EMLA cream applied 60 min before the procedure [127]. ELA-Max may also decrease the incidence of methemoglobinemia as it does not contain prilocaine [85]. ELA-Max has been beneficial for intravenous cannulations and in office meatotomies [127,128,129,130,131].
Applications of local anesthetics to mucous membranes have been reported to decrease discomfort during nasotracheal intubation, nasogastric tube insertions, and bronchoscopy [132,133,134,135,136]. This application may be accomplished by a number of methods including direct spray, nebulization, or ointment or jelly application [137,138,139,140].
Regional Anesthetic Blocks
Head and Neck Blocks
Blockade of the great auricular nerve acts as an opioid sparing technique for tympanomastoidectomy and otoplasty, and in the treatments of moyamoya disease and postherpetic neuralgia [141,142,143,144]. The nerve arises from the superior cervical plexus (C2, C3) and provides sensory innervation to the lateral occipital region and medial auricle. The nerve ascends superficial to the posterior belly of the clavicular head of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (Fig. 15.1). Local anesthetic is injected along this subcutaneous region at the level of the cricoid cartilage. Complications include intravascular injection of the carotid artery or internal jugular vein and phrenic nerve block resulting in Horner’s syndrome [54, 145].
Effective pain relief for cleft lip repair as well as for sinus surgery, rhinoplasty, and nasal septal reconstruction can be provided by an infraorbital nerve block [146, 147]. The sensory nerve is derived from the second maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve and exits the skull through the foramen rotundum before passing through the infraorbital foramen. It then divides into four branches—internal and external nasal, superior labial, and inferior palpebral branches. These branches innervate the skin of the upper lip, lower eyelid and cheek and lateral nose. Two field blocks, extraoral and intraoral can block the nerve (Figs. 15.2 and 15.3). The external approach involves locating the infraorbital foramen approximately 0.5 cm inferior to the lower orbital margin. A 27-gauge needle is then inserted until bone is contacted. The needle is then withdrawn slightly and following negative aspiration a small amount of local anesthetic (0.25–0.5 mL) is injected. The intraoral approach starts with the same landmark by palpating the infraorbital foramen with the non-dominant hand to maintain position. The upper lip is then lifted and a 25–27-gauge needle is used to inject 0.5–1.5 mL of local anesthetic following negative aspiration along the inner surface of the lip along the maxillary premolar toward the infraorbital foramen. Other than swelling around the eyelid, which can be reduced by pressure over the injection site for several minutes, complications from this block are rare.
Indications for supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve blocks include procedures on the scalp and forehead such as frontal craniotomies, ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions, excision of skin lesions, and laser therapy for hemangiomas (Fig. 15.4) [143, 148, 149]. The nerves are branches of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve and supply the skin of the forehead and conjunctiva of the upper eyelid. The supraorbital nerve is found in the upper margin of the orbit at the supraorbital notch and the supratrochlear nerve is in close proximity and just medially. After palpating the supraorbital notch, a 27-gauge needle is inserted superior to the notch until bone is contacted. Local anesthetic (1 mL) is injected after slight withdrawal and negative aspiration for blood. The needle is withdrawn and directed slightly medially before injecting another 1 mL of local anesthetic following negative aspiration. Hematomas and periorbital edema are common complications [150, 151], but can be minimized by applying pressure for approximately 5 min.
Brachial Plexus Block
Although there are several approaches to the brachial plexus in children, the axillary approach is commonly used for brachial plexus blockade [152, 153]. Recently, the use of US allows infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexus [81, 154,155,156,157]. The brachial plexus arises from the cervical nerve roots (C5-T1). Brachial plexus blocks are easy to perform in children, due to less adipose tissue when compared to adults, and the axillary artery is easier to palpate and isolate [158, 159]. The arm is abducted to a 90° angle in relation to the chest wall. The artery is palpated and fixed in the axilla, and the 22-guage, short-bevel, 2-in. needle allows accurate placement around and when necessary through the axillary artery (Fig. 15.5). With ‘through and through’ axillary artery puncture technique continuous aspiration is required as the needle is advanced until no blood is aspirated, then one-half of the local anesthetic is injected into the distal portion of the sheath. As the needle is withdrawn, again the needle is continuously aspirated until no blood can be withdrawn, and the remaining half of the local anesthetic can be injected into the proximal portion of the sheath. The recommended dose of local anesthetic is 1 mL/kg of either 0.25% bupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine [102]. Vigilant aspiration should be performed to minimize intravascular injection. An additional circumferential subcutaneous cuff block for the intercostobrachial nerve to minimize tourniquet pain is also recommended.
The use of a nerve stimulator can assist the operator in advancing the 22-guage, short-bevel 2-in. needle into the sheath of the brachial plexus superior to the axillary artery. Once a twitch is elicited, local anesthetic solution can be injected into the sheath. Again a ring of local anesthetic can be subcutaneously injected in a ring around the upper arm to block the intercostobrachial nerve to provide tourniquet-related pain relief.
Ultrasound is also effective in visualizing the interscalene approach to the brachial plexus [81, 160,161,162,163,164]. A recent review of the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network reported placement of interscalene blocks in children under general anesthesia identified no serious adverse events [81].
Paravertebral Block
With the ability to target specific dermatomes, single-sided paravertebral blockade is indicated for patients undergoing renal surgery, thoracotomy, unilateral abdominal procedures such as cholecystectomy and even inguinal surgery [165, 166]. The bilateral approach expands its use in chronic management of pancreatitis or to procedures that cross or involve the midline, such as Nuss repair of pectus excavatum or following laparoscopic cholecystectomy [167,168,169]. Lönnqvist and others demonstrated continuous paravertebral blockade to be superior to continuous epidural blockade in reducing morphine requirements in children undergoing renal surgery [165, 166]. Berta and others demonstrated benefits observed in single case reports [167,168,169] and in patients undergoing major renal surgery [170]. Loftus and colleagues reported beneficial use of paravertebral continuous infusion pain catheters following pectus excavatum repair surgery resulting in shorter hospital length of stays [171].
A wedge-shaped area, the paravertebral space is bound anteriorly by the parietal pleural, posteriorly by the superior costotransverse ligament, laterally by the posterior intercostal membrane, and medially by the vertebra (Fig. 15.6). The space contains spinal roots emerging from the intervertebral foramina from the dorsal and ventral rami and the sympathetic chain. Blockade may involve several dermatomes and can produce sensory, sympathetic, and motor blockade. In the pediatric population, the block is usually performed under general anesthesia with the patient in the lateral position. After establishing the midline, the point of lateral approach is estimated by measuring the distance between spinous processes. The needle is inserted perpendicular to skin until contact with the transverse process. The needle is then slightly retraced and directed caudal to walk off the process. In adults, the needle is then advanced 1 cm deeper than the transverse process, while in children the space is usually more superficial. Further confirmation may be obtained by a loss of resistance technique similar to epidural placement. A “pop” may be felt as the needle penetrates the paravertebral space. At this point, a drop of sterile fluid is placed at the needle hub and the patient is given a deep breath to rule out intrapleural placement. A 22-gauge blunt needle is then used to inject 0.5 mL/kg of local anesthetic for unilateral blockade. Ropivacaine 0.2% or bupivacaine 0.25% is typically used. A Touhy needle can be used to thread a catheter for continuous techniques. Typical infusion rates are 0.25 mL/kg/h in children and 0.2 mL/kg/h in infants of 0.1–0.125% local anesthetic.
The proximity of this block to the epidural space leads to the possibility of inadvertent epidural or spinal blockade resulting in hypotension or rarely a “high spinal” [172, 173]. Other complications include vascular or pleural puncture and pneumothorax [174, 175]. A 10.7% failure rate in adults and 6.2% in children was demonstrated in one series of 367 patients by Lönnqvist and others [176]. However the use of bilateral paravertebral technique doubled the likelihood of accidental vascular puncture (9% vs. 5%) and with an eightfold increase in pleural puncture and pneumothorax complications (3% vs. 0.4%) when compared with unilateral blocks [177].
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
As a landmark-based technique, the transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) has provided excellent analgesia in adults undergoing lower abdominal surgery including hernia repair, appendectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, and caesareans [178,179,180,181,182]. Application to the pediatric population, in which landmarks are difficult or impossible to palpate, has been eased by the use of US [9, 183,184,185,186,187,188,189]. The TAP block is especially useful in cases where neuraxial blockade is contraindicated [184]. A TAP block may substitute for the ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block and can also provide analgesia for more superior abdominal incisions from laparotomy or laparoscopy. Incisional pain can be well controlled but the block is less effective for visceral pain [9, 183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190].
The anterolateral abdominal wall is innervated by the anterior rami of T7-L1 and include the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, intercostal, and subcostal nerves (Fig. 15.7) [191]. These nerves travel in the intercostal space before entering the abdominal wall between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. This plane serves as the target for the TAP block. The landmark technique involves locating the lumbar triangle of Petit. The base of the triangle lies on the highest point of the iliac crest and the apex is at the costal margin. Anterior and posterior borders include the external oblique muscle and latissimus dorsi muscle, respectively. A blunt 22-gauge 2-in. needle is inserted in this location and passes through the external oblique muscular fascia, then the internal oblique muscular fascia (Fig. 15.7). After these two fascial “pops” are appreciated, local anesthetic is injected following negative aspiration with obvious care not to exceed toxic levels. A bilateral TAP block may be used for midline incisions or procedures involving both sides [9, 182, 183, 185,186,187,188,189, 192, 193].
Aside from real-time visualization, US offers a distinct advantage for this block in the pediatric population as the triangle of Petit is difficult to ascertain in children and loss of resistance through less developed internal and external oblique muscles can be difficult to appreciate [191, 194]. Placement of the US probe in the transverse plane above the iliac crest usually provides excellent visualization of the external and internal obliques fascial planes, transversus abdominis fascial plane, and peritoneal plane although the US probe may need to be directed more medially in some patients. Local anesthetic is deposited following negative aspiration as the needle tip is visualized deep to the internal oblique fascial plane. Spread within the internal oblique and transversus abdominis fascial plane confirms accurate placement. An US-guided Tuohy needle can be used to place a continuous catheter 2–3 cm beyond the needle tip if prolonged analgesia is required [9, 186, 187].
Complications are similar to those reported with ilioinguinal blockade including peritoneal perforation and femoral nerve palsy [182, 192, 195]. The catheter-based technique has a theoretical risk of infection. There are no reported complications with the US-guided technique [9, 182, 185,186,187,188,189, 192].
Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Block
Analgesia for inguinal hernia repair, hydrocelectomy, and orchiopexy is provided by an ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block [41, 79, 196, 197]. Originating from the lumbar plexus, the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves pass superficial to the transversus abdominus near the anterior superior iliac spine (Fig. 15.8). These nerves can be blocked at this site before separating. The iliohypogastric nerve supplies skin over the lower anterior abdominal wall, while the ilioinguinal supplies skin over the scrotum or labium majoris.
A blunt 22–25 gauge needle is inserted 1 cm superior and 1 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) (Fig. 15.8). A field block is then performed directing the needle parallel to the muscle wall in the direction of the ASIS. The needle is withdrawn while injecting anesthetic and redirected toward the inguinal ligament with care not to puncture the ligament. Penetration of the oblique muscles results in a characteristic “pop” after while local anesthetic is again injected. The block can also be performed post surgically by the surgeon under direct vision. Bupivacaine 0.25% or ropivacaine 0.2% or 0.5% are typically used.
Ultrasound guidance involves direct visualization of the nerve or nerves by placement of the probe just medial to the superior aspect of the ASIS . An out-of-plane technique is typically employed as the nerves’ proximity to the ASIS can make the in-plane technique challenging [198]. At this location, the nerves are typically less than 1 cm deep and run between the internal oblique and transversus abdominus muscle.
Serious complications are rare and include small bowel or colonic perforation [199]. Transient femoral blockade resulting in motor weakness of the quadriceps can occur in up to 5% of patients if the local anesthetic tracks inferior to the inguinal ligament [200].
Penile Nerve Block
Arising from the sacral plexus , innervation of the distal two-thirds of the penis is supplied by branches of the pudendal nerve known as dorsal nerves . The nerves are surrounded by Buck’s fascia and are near dorsal vessels (Fig. 15.9). Various techniques exist for anesthetizing these nerves for intraoperative and postoperative pain secondary to circumcision and uncomplicated hypospadias repair. They include application of topical cream, subcutaneous ring block, dorsal nerve block, and suprapubic nerve block [124, 201,202,203]. Studies have shown the subcutaneous ring block to be more effective than the other techniques [201, 203].
Application of topical cream is the simplest method and has been employed because of its ability to penetrate intact foreskin [203, 204]. As absorption may be increased through mucous membranes, care must be taken to use the minimum amount necessary. Subcutaneous ring block involves placing a skin wheal of local anesthetic circumferentially around the base of the penis [205]. Injection of local anesthetic to the penis bilaterally at the symphysis pubis is known as the dorsal penile block . With downward traction of the penis, a 25-gauge needle is directed medially and caudally until Buck’s fascia is penetrated at 10:30 and at 1:30 until a characteristic “pop” is felt. Frequent aspiration is necessary due to the close proximity of the dorsal vessels at this location [206,207,208,209].
Most sources recommend the avoidance of epinephrine with these blocks as vasoconstriction can theoretically result in necrosis [210, 211]. A volume of 0.1 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25–0.5% or ropivacaine 0.2% is typically used and provides approximately 4–6 h of analgesia. Complications include hematoma formation resulting in necrosis, intravascular injection, and tissue edema affecting surgical conditions [101, 205, 212]. Recent studies examined the role of US and found improved efficacy with the block [213,214,215,216,217].
Caudal Block
Although regional block needles are used in the performance of the pediatric caudal block, a number of studies advocate the use of styletted, short-beveled 22-guage needles [218,219,220], as the styletted needle may reduce the risk of introduction of a dermal plug into the caudal space [219]. The approach to the caudal canal is dependent upon proper angle of the needle as parallel insertion to the sacrum is required through the sacrococcygeal membrane (Fig. 15.10). Final needle placement is dependent upon a “pop” as the blunt needle pierces the sacrococcygeal membrane. Aspiration should be performed prior to injection of the local anesthetic solution. A test-dose including epinephrine (0.5 mcg/kg) helps identify that the needle is not in the intravascular or intraosseous space (Fig. 15.10 bottom cartoon). During injection, the lack of subcutaneous swelling is a helpful sign of proper needle placement. Relaxation of the anal sphincter also predicts successful blockade [221].
Extension of the Caudal Catheter into the Lumbar or Thoracic Regions
Caudal catheters were used in the past in adults, but lost their popularity with the development of lumbar and thoracic approaches to the epidural space [222]. However, there has been a recent resurgence in caudal catheter epidural placement in neonates and in infants as they can be used to facilitate the surgical anesthetic and be a component of a postoperative analgesia regimen. A recent large review of the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network in over 18,000 caudal blocks reported a 1.9% complication rate due to block failure, blood aspiration, and intravascular injection. There were no permanent sequelae reported [65]. The caudal canal in neonates can allow easy access to the lumbar and thoracic segments with minimal resistance in passage of the catheter [222,223,224,225,226]. However, in older patients, the addition of fibrous and fatty tissue and development of septal membranes in the epidural space, can impede caudal catheter advancement [227, 228].
Summary
The benefits of regional analgesia in the management of postoperative pain are clearly recognized. Despite many reported advantages, the use of peripheral nerve blocks in perioperative care for children continues to be underutilized. Although these regional techniques are safe, they are not without risk [85, 99, 229]. The application of ultrasonography should decrease some of these risks [34, 61, 70, 99, 230]. Regional anesthesia can be an important component to multi-modal analgesia [217, 231, 232]. Certainly the role of the parents regarding postoperative instructions is important in the transition of analgesic regimens as the regional block wanes [233]. However, these postoperative analgesia instructions should not be significantly different than what is currently employed for pediatric patients following general anesthesia. In any perioperative plan of care, the risks and benefits of any technique lie with the skill and experience of the caregiver. Nevertheless, regional anesthesia is an effective method of providing postoperative analgesia in the pediatric patient.
References
Armitage EN. Is there a place for regional anesthesia in pediatrics?—Yes! Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1988;39(3):191–5.
Dick W. Is there a place for regional anesthesia in pediatrics?—No! Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1988;39(3):185–9.
Bhatt-Mehta V, Rosen DA. Management of acute pain in children. Clin Pharm. 1991;10(9):667–85.
Anand KJ, Hickey PR. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(21):1321–9.
Fitzgerald M, Beggs S. The neurobiology of pain: developmental aspects. Neuroscientist. 2001;7(3):246–57.
Amory C, et al. Is ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block always totally safe in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2003;13(2):164–6.
Ivani G, Tonetti F. Postoperative analgesia in infants and children: new developments. Minerva Anestesiol. 2004;70(5):399–403.
Wolf AR. Effects of regional analgesia on stress responses to pediatric surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(1):19–24.
Abu Elyazed MM, et al. The effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on postoperative analgesia and neuroendocrine stress response in pediatric patients undergoing elective open inguinal hernia repair. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26(12):1165–71.
Rafique MB, et al. Anesthesia for children with mitochondrial disorders: a national survey and review. J Anesth. 2013;27(2):186–91.
Disma N, Hansen TG. Pediatric anesthesia and neurotoxicity: can findings be translated from animals to humans? Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82(7):791–6.
El Sayed MF, et al. Safety profile of morphine following surgery in neonates. J Perinatol. 2007;27(7):444–7.
Anderson BJ, Palmer GM. Recent pharmacological advances in paediatric analgesics. Biomed Pharmacother. 2006;60(7):303–9.
Suominen PK, et al. Intrathecal morphine provides effective and safe analgesia in children after cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(7):875–82.
Dial S, et al. Pediatric sedation for procedures titrated to a desired degree of immobility results in unpredictable depth of sedation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001;17(6):414–20.
Wood CM, et al. Randomised double blind trial of morphine versus diamorphine for sedation of preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;79(1):F34–9.
Barker DP, et al. Randomised, double blind trial of two loading dose regimens of diamorphine in ventilated newborn infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995;73(1):F22–6.
Inturrisi CE. Clinical pharmacology of opioids for pain. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(4 Suppl):S3–13.
Simons SH, Anand KJ. Pain control: opioid dosing, population kinetics and side-effects. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11(4):260–7.
Lynn AM, et al. Respiratory effects of intravenous morphine infusions in neonates, infants, and children after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(4):695-701.
Farrington EA, et al. Continuous intravenous morphine infusion in postoperative newborn infants. Am J Perinatol. 1993;10(1):84–7.
Hunt A, et al. Transdermal fentanyl for pain relief in a paediatric palliative care population. Palliat Med. 2001;15(5):405–12.
Hunt A, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of oral morphine and its glucuronides in children receiving morphine as immediate-release liquid or sustained-release tablets for cancer pain. J Pediatr. 1999;135(1):47–55.
Rodgers A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1493.
Bouwmeester NJ, et al. Developmental pharmacokinetics of morphine and its metabolites in neonates, infants and young children. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(2):208–17.
Urwin SC, Parker MJ, Griffiths R. General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(4):450–5.
Liu SS, Wu CL. Effect of postoperative analgesia on major postoperative complications: a systematic update of the evidence. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(3):689–702.
Liu SS, Wu CL. The effect of analgesic technique on postoperative patient-reported outcomes including analgesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(3):789–808.
Wu CL, et al. Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality after total hip replacement surgery in medicare patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28(4):271–8.
Ballantyne JC, et al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(3):598–612.
Ganapathy S, et al. Best evidence in anesthetic practice: prevention: epidural anesthesia and analgesia does not reduce 30-day all-cause mortality and major morbidity after abdominal surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50(2):143–6.
Beattie WS, Badner NH, Choi PT. Meta-analysis demonstrates statistically significant reduction in postoperative myocardial infarction with the use of thoracic epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(3):919–20.
Weiss M, et al. Safe anesthesia for every tot—the SAFETOTS initiative. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28(3):302–7.
Ecoffey C. Safety in pediatric regional anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(1):25–30.
Polaner DM, Drescher J. Pediatric regional anesthesia: what is the current safety record? Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21(7):737–42.
Buist RJ. A survey of the practice of regional anaesthesia. J R Soc Med. 1990;83(11):709–12.
Chelly JE, et al. Anesthesia and postoperative analgesia: outcomes following orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics. 2003;26(8 Suppl):s865–71.
Hadzic A, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks result in superior recovery profile compared with general anesthesia in outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(4):976–81.
Bolte RG, et al. Mini-dose Bier block intravenous regional anesthesia in the emergency department treatment of pediatric upper-extremity injuries. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(4):534–7.
Walker BJ, et al. Peripheral nerve catheters in children: an analysis of safety and practice patterns from the pediatric regional anesthesia network (PRAN). Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(3):457–62.
Visoiu M. Paediatric regional anaesthesia: a current perspective. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28(5):577–82.
Vicchio N, Mossetti V, Ivani G. Evaluation of 18279 blocks in a pediatric hospital. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5(2):e22897.
Muhly WT, Gurnaney HG, Ganesh A. Regional anesthesia for pediatric knee surgery: a review of the indications, procedures, outcomes, safety, and challenges. Local Reg Anesth. 2015;8:85–91.
Siegel AL, Snyder HM, Duckett JW. Outpatient pediatric urological surgery: techniques for a successful and cost-effective practice. J Urol. 1986;136(4):879–81.
Everett LL. Newer drugs in pediatric anesthesia. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1999;8(1):6–12.
Pershad J, Todd K, Waters T. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sedation and analgesia regimens during fracture manipulation in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(10):729–36.
Hall-Burton DM, et al. Regional anesthesia is cost-effective in preventing unanticipated hospital admission in pediatric patients having anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(4):527–31.
Piacevoli Q, et al. Costs and quality in loco-regional anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71(9):543–7.
Kaloud H. The autonomic block in pediatrics. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1957;107(32–33):664–6.
Anastasov K. Conduction anesthesia in children. Stomatologiia (Sofiia). 1954;6:360–4.
Haupt H, Nagel W. Application of autonomic blockade with phenothiazine derivatives. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1954;102(1):4–9.
Anastasov K. Novocaine anesthesia and block in children. Stomatologiia (Sofiia). 1953;6:354–60.
Mossetti V, Ivani G. Controversial issues in pediatric regional anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(1):109–14.
Brull R, et al. Practice patterns related to block selection, nerve localization and risk disclosure: a survey of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(5):395–403.
Constantine E, et al. The use of local anesthetic techniques for closed forearm fracture reduction in children: a survey of academic pediatric emergency departments. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007;23(4):209–11.
Ford S, et al. Defining the reliability of sonoanatomy identification by novices in ultrasound-guided pediatric ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blockade. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(6):1793–8.
Schuepfer G, et al. Generating a learning curve for pediatric caudal epidural blocks: an empirical evaluation of technical skills in novice and experienced anesthetists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25(4):385–8.
Rubin K, Sullivan D, Sadhasivam S. Are peripheral and neuraxial blocks with ultrasound guidance more effective and safe in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(2):92–6.
Gurnaney H, et al. Safety of pediatric continuous interscalene block catheters placed under general anesthesia: a single center’s experience. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(3):377–83.
Gupta A, Saha U. Spinal anesthesia in children: a review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014;30(1):10–8.
Boretsky KR. Regional anesthesia in pediatrics: marching forward. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27(5):556–60.
Russell P, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Schug SA. Perioperative analgesia in pediatric surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26(4):420–7.
Llewellyn N, Moriarty A. The national pediatric epidural audit. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17(6):520–33.
Deer JD, Sawardekar A, Suresh S. Day surgery regional anesthesia in children: safety and improving outcomes, do they make a difference? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29(6):691–5.
Suresh S, et al. Are caudal blocks for pain control safe in children? An analysis of 18,650 caudal blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(1):151–6.
Giaufre E, Dalens B, Gombert A. Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 1996;83(5):904–12.
Bernards CM, et al. Regional anesthesia in anesthetized or heavily sedated patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(5):449–60.
Liu Y, et al. Comparison of the development of performance skills in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia simulations with different phantom models. Simul Healthc. 2013;8(6):368–75.
Amiri HR, Espandar R. Upper extremity surgery in younger children under ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a case series. J Child Orthop. 2011;5(1):5–9.
Roberts S. Ultrasonographic guidance in pediatric regional anesthesia. Part 2: techniques. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(11):1112–24.
Tsui BC, Pillay JJ. Evidence-based medicine: assessment of ultrasound imaging for regional anesthesia in infants, children, and adolescents. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35(2 Suppl):S47–54.
Tsui BC, Suresh S. Ultrasound imaging for regional anesthesia in infants, children, and adolescents: a review of current literature and its application in the practice of neuraxial blocks. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(3):719–28.
Tsui B, Suresh S. Ultrasound imaging for regional anesthesia in infants, children, and adolescents: a review of current literature and its application in the practice of extremity and trunk blocks. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(2):473–92.
Mariano ER, et al. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block catheters for pain control on pediatric medical missions in developing countries. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18(7):598–601.
Baldi C, et al. Ultrasound guidance for locoregional anesthesia: a review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007;73(11):587–93.
Johr M. Practical pediatric regional anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26(3):327–32.
Moore DL, Ding L, Sadhasivam S. Novel real-time feedback and integrated simulation model for teaching and evaluating ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia skills in pediatric anesthesia trainees. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(9):847–53.
Liu Y, Glass NL, Power RW. Technical communication: new teaching model for practicing ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques: no perishable food products! Anesth Analg. 2010;110(4):1233–5.
Ivani G, Mosseti V. Pediatric regional anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009;75(10):577–83.
Arul GS, Spicer RD. Where should paediatric surgery be performed? Arch Dis Child. 1998;79(1):65–70; discussion 70–2
Taenzer A, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus blocks under general anesthesia in children: is this safe practice?: a report from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39(6):502–5.
Tobias JD, Flannagan J. Regional anesthesia in the preterm neonate. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1992;31(11):668–71.
Mazoit JX. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of anesthetics in children: therapeutic implications. Paediatr Drugs. 2006;8(3):139–50.
Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19(2):247–68.
Gunter JB. Benefit and risks of local anesthetics in infants and children. Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(10):649–72.
Mather LE. The acute toxicity of local anesthetics. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010;6(11):1313–32.
Santos AC, DeArmas PI. Systemic toxicity of levobupivacaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine during continuous intravenous infusion to nonpregnant and pregnant ewes. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(5):1256–64.
Groban L, et al. Cardiac resuscitation after incremental overdosage with lidocaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(1):37–43.
De Negri P, et al. New local anesthetics for pediatric anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005;18(3):289–92.
Fuzier R, et al. Adverse drug reactions to local anaesthetics: a review of the French pharmacovigilance database. Drug Saf. 2009;32(4):345–56.
Copeland SE, et al. The effects of general anesthesia on the central nervous and cardiovascular system toxicity of local anesthetics. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(5):1429–39.
Corman SL, Skledar SJ. Use of lipid emulsion to reverse local anesthetic-induced toxicity. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(11):1873–7.
Mather LE, Copeland SE, Ladd LA. Acute toxicity of local anesthetics: underlying pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic concepts. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30(6):553–66.
Fein JA, Gorelick MH. The decision to use topical anesthetic for intravenous insertion in the pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(3):264–8.
Houck CS, Sethna NF. Transdermal analgesia with local anesthetics in children: review, update and future directions. Expert Rev Neurother. 2005;5(5):625–34.
Sohmer B, et al. EMLA cream is an effective topical anesthetic for bronchoscopy. Can Respir J. 2004;11(8):587–8.
Kundu S, Achar S. Principles of office anesthesia: part II. Topical anesthesia. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66(1):99–102.
Weise KL, Nahata MC. EMLA for painful procedures in infants. J Pediatr Health Care. 2005;19(1):42–7; quiz 48–9
Neal JM, et al. The second American Society of Regional Anesthesia and pain medicine evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(2):181–94.
Neal JM, et al. The ASRA evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and pain medicine: executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35(2 Suppl):S1–9.
Markakis DA. Regional anesthesia in pediatrics. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2000;18(2):355–81. vii
Wilder RT. Local anesthetics for the pediatric patient. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2000;47(3):545–58.
Pierluisi GJ, Terndrup TE. Influence of topical anesthesia on the sedation of pediatric emergency department patients with lacerations. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1989;5(4):211–5.
Bonadio WA, Wagner V. Efficacy of TAC topical anesthetic for repair of pediatric lacerations. Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(2):203–5.
White WB, Iserson KV, Criss E. Topical anesthesia for laceration repair: tetracaine versus TAC (tetracaine, adrenaline, and cocaine). Am J Emerg Med. 1986;4(4):319–22.
Schaffer DJ. Clinical comparison of TAC anesthetic solutions with and without cocaine. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14(11):1077–80.
Pryor GJ, Kilpatrick WR, Opp DR. Local anesthesia in minor lacerations: topical TAC vs lidocaine infiltration. Ann Emerg Med. 1980;9(11):568–71.
Ehrenstrom Reiz GM, Reiz SL. EMLA—a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for topical anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1982;26(6):596–8.
Wahlgren CF, Quiding H. Depth of cutaneous analgesia after application of a eutectic mixture of the local anesthetics lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA cream). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(4):584–8.
Bjerring P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Depth and duration of skin analgesia to needle insertion after topical application of EMLA cream. Br J Anaesth. 1990;64(2):173–7.
Shachor-Meyouhas Y, Galbraith R, Shavit I. Application of topical analgesia in triage: a potential for harm. J Emerg Med. 2008;35(1):39–41.
Kopecky EA, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of EMLA in the treatment of postburn pruritus in pediatric patients: a pilot study. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2001;22(3):235–42.
Brisman M, et al. Methaemoglobin formation after the use of EMLA cream in term neonates. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(11):1191–4.
Choi EK, et al. The use of EMLA cream reduces the pain of skin puncture associated with caudal block in children. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016;69(2):149–54.
Rogers TL, Ostrow CL. The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2004;19(1):33–9.
Jacobson RM, et al. Making vaccines more acceptable—methods to prevent and minimize pain and other common adverse events associated with vaccines. Vaccine. 2001;19(17–19):2418–27.
Datta S. Use of a eutectic mixture of local anesthesia in newborns. Indian Pediatr. 1999;36(7):726–7.
Butler-O’Hara M, LeMoine C, Guillet R. Analgesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial of EMLA cream versus dorsal penile nerve block. Pediatrics. 1998;101(4):E5.
Zempsky WT, Karasic RB. EMLA versus TAC for topical anesthesia of extremity wounds in children. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30(2):163–6.
Vetter TR. A comparison of EMLA cream versus nitrous oxide for pediatric venous cannulation. J Clin Anesth. 1995;7(6):486–90.
Steward DJ. Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA): what is it? What does it do? J Pediatr. 1993;122(5 Pt 2):S21–3.
Robieux IC, et al. The feasibility of using EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics) cream in pediatric outpatient clinics. Can J Hosp Pharm. 1990;43(5):235–6, xxxii.
Dutta S. Use of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics in children. Indian J Pediatr. 1999;66(5):707–15.
Brady-Fryer B, Wiebe N, Lander JA. Pain relief for neonatal circumcision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;4:CD004217.
Shavit I, et al. Lidocaine-based topical anesthetic with disinfectant (LidoDin) versus EMLA for venipuncture: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(8):711–4.
Altman DA, Gildenberg SR. High-energy pulsed light source hair removal device used to evaluate the onset of action of a new topical anesthetic. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(10):816–8.
Eichenfield LF, et al. A clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of ELA-Max (4% liposomal lidocaine) as compared with eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream for pain reduction of venipuncture in children. Pediatrics. 2002;109(6):1093–9.
Spanos S, et al. Jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus topical ELA-Max for anesthesia before peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008;24(8):511–5.
Smith DP, Gjellum M. The efficacy of LMX versus EMLA for pain relief in boys undergoing office meatotomy. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 2):1760–1.
Luhmann J, et al. A comparison of buffered lidocaine versus ELA-Max before peripheral intravenous catheter insertions in children. Pediatrics. 2004;113(3 Pt 1):e217–20.
Kleiber C, et al. Topical anesthetics for intravenous insertion in children: a randomized equivalency study. Pediatrics. 2002;110(4):758–61.
Zhijun C, et al. Therapeutic experience from 1428 patients with pediatric tracheobronchial foreign body. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(4):718–21.
Randell T, et al. Topical anaesthesia of the nasal mucosa for fibreoptic airway endoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 1992;68(2):164–7.
Wolfe TR, Fosnocht DE, Linscott MS. Atomized lidocaine as topical anesthesia for nasogastric tube placement: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35(5):421–5.
West HH. Topical anesthesia for nasogastric tube placement. Ann Emerg Med. 1982;11(11):645.
Wangemann BU, Jantzen JP. Fiberoptic intubation of neurosurgical patients. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1993;36(4):117–22.
Gjonaj ST, Lowenthal DB, Dozor AJ. Nebulized lidocaine administered to infants and children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. Chest. 1997;112(6):1665–9.
Ohzeki K, et al. Local anesthetic cream prepared from lidocaine-tetracaine eutectic mixture. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2008;128(4):611–6.
Hakim OM, El-Hag YG, Haikal MA. Strabismus surgery under augmented topical anesthesia. J AAPOS. 2005;9(3):279–84.
Haasio J, et al. Topical anaesthesia of gingival mucosa by 5% eutectic mixture of lignocaine and prilocaine or by 10% lignocaine spray. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28(2):99–101.
Suresh S, Wheeler M. Practical pediatric regional anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2002;20(1):83–113.
Suresh S, et al. Postoperative pain relief in children undergoing tympanomastoid surgery: is a regional block better than opioids? Anesth Analg. 2002;94(4):859–62.
Ahn HJ, et al. Effect of preoperative skull block on pediatric moyamoya disease. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;2(1):37–41.
Wang SM. An integrative approach for treating postherpetic neuralgia—a case report. Pain Pract. 2007;7(3):274–8.
Aldoori MI, Baird RN. Local neurological complication during carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;29(4):432–6.
Suresh S, et al. Regional anaesthesia to improve pain outcomes in paediatric surgical patients: a qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(3):375–90.
Salloum ML, et al. Combined use of infraorbital and external nasal nerve blocks for effective perioperative pain control during and after cleft lip repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(6):629–35.
Szperka CL, Gelfand AA, Hershey AD. Patterns of use of peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections for pediatric headache: results of a survey of the American Headache Society Pediatric and Adolescent Section. Headache. 2016;56(10):1597–607.
Wiewrodt D, Wagner W. Long-term significance of injury to the supraorbital or supratrochlear nerves during frontoorbital advancement in infancy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25(12):1589–91.
Barnett P. Alternatives to sedation for painful procedures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25(6):415–9; quiz 420–2.
Ismail AR, et al. Regional nerve block of the upper eyelid in oculoplastic surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006;16(4):509–13.
Kriwanek KL, et al. Axillary block for analgesia during manipulation of forearm fractures in the pediatric emergency department a prospective randomized comparative trial. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(6):737–40.
Desbordes J, et al. Brachial plexus anesthesia via an axillary route for emergency surgery: comparison of three approach methods. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1998;17(7):674–80.
Ponde VC. Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a modified technique to better secure catheter position in infants and children. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(1):94–6.
Loland VJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided perineural catheter and local anesthetic infusion in the perioperative management of pediatric limb salvage: a case report. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(9):905–7.
Amiri HR, Espandar R. Upper extremity surgery in younger children under ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a case series. J Child Orthop. 2010;4(4):315–9.
de Jose Maria B, Tielens LK. Vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block in children: a preliminary study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14(11):931–5.
Wall JJ. Axillary nerve blocks. Am Fam Physician. 1975;11(5):135–42.
Ross DM, Williams DO. Combined axillary plexus block and basal sedation for cardiac catheterization in young children. Br Heart J. 1970;32(2):195–7.
Torrillo TM, Rosenblatt MA. Ultrasound-guided interscalene catheters performed under general anesthesia in a patient with Huntington’s disease. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010;76(8):645–8.
Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Rasmussen H, Hesselbjerg L. Long-axis ultrasound imaging of the nerves and advancement of perineural catheters under direct vision: a preliminary report of four cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(5):477–82.
Fredrickson MJ. Ultrasound-assisted interscalene catheter placement in a child. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35(5):807–8.
Jan van Geffen G, Tielens L, Gielen M. Ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block in a child with femur fibula ulna syndrome. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(3):330–2.
Lee JH, et al. Ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block in a pediatric patient with acute hepatitis—a case report. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;62(6):568–70.
Lonnqvist PA, Hildingsson U. The caudal boundary of the thoracic paravertebral space. A study in human cadavers. Anaesthesia. 1992;47(12):1051–2.
Lonnqvist PA, Olsson GL. Paravertebral vs epidural block in children. Effects on postoperative morphine requirement after renal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38(4):346–9.
Hutchins J, et al. Postoperative pain control with paravertebral catheters after pediatric total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation: a retrospective cohort study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26(3):315–20.
Visoiu M, Cassara A, Yang CI. Bilateral paravertebral blockade (T7-10) versus incisional local anesthetic administration for pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(5):1106–13.
Hall Burton DM, Boretsky KR. A comparison of paravertebral nerve block catheters and thoracic epidural catheters for postoperative analgesia following the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum repair. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(5):516–20.
Berta E, et al. Single injection paravertebral block for renal surgery in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18(7):593–7.
Loftus PD, et al. Paravertebral regional blocks decrease length of stay following surgery for pectus excavatum in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(1):149–53.
Karmakar MK, et al. Continuous thoracic paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine for pain management in patients with multiple fractured ribs. Chest. 2003;123(2):424–31.
Chung YT, et al. Inadvertent epidural spread after subpleural-paravertebral block with 0.5% bupivacaine. Ma Zui Xue Za Zhi. 1989;27(4):381–4.
Lall NG, Sharma SR. “Clicking” pneumothorax following thoracic paravertebral block. Case report. Br J Anaesth. 1971;43(4):415–7.
Tenicela R, Pollan SB. Paravertebral-peridural block technique: a unilateral thoracic block. Clin J Pain. 1990;6(3):227–34.
Lonnqvist PA, et al. Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 1995;50(9):813–5.
Naja Z, Lonnqvist PA. Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade. Incidence of failed block and complications. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(12):1184–8.
Conaghan P, et al. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic colorectal resections. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(10):2480–4.
Araco A, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block reduces the analgesic requirements after abdominoplasty with flank liposuction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;65(4):385–8.
Niraj G, et al. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(4):601–5.
Niraj G, Kelkar A, Fox AJ. Oblique sub-costal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters: an alternative to epidural analgesia after upper abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(10):1137–40.
Belavy D, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(5):726–30.
Suresh S, Chan VW. Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block in infants, children and adolescents: a simple procedural guidance for their performance. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(4):296–9.
Taylor LJ, et al. Children with spinal dysraphism: transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters to the rescue! Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(10):951–4.
Hernandez MA, Vecchione T, Boretsky K. Dermatomal spread following posterior transversus abdominis plane block in pediatric patients: our initial experience. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017;27(3):300–4.
Hamill JK, et al. Rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26(4):363–71.
Faasse MA, et al. Perioperative effects of caudal and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for children undergoing urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(3):121 e1–7.
Long JB, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block in children: a multicenter safety analysis of 1994 cases from the PRAN (Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network) database. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(2):395–9.
Mai CL, Young MJ, Quraishi SA. Clinical implications of the transversus abdominis plane block in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(9):831–40.
Carney J, et al. Ipsilateral transversus abdominis plane block provides effective analgesia after appendectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(4):998–1003.
Jankovic ZB, du Feu FM, McConnell P. An anatomical study of the transversus abdominis plane block: location of the lumbar triangle of Petit and adjacent nerves. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(3):981–5.
Ra YS, et al. The analgesic effect of the ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010;58(4):362–8.
McDonnell JG, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(1):186–91.
Petersen PL, et al. The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(5):529–35.
Carney J, et al. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(6):2056–60.
Broadman LM. Blocks and other techniques pediatric surgeons can employ to reduce postoperative pain in pediatric patients. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1999;8(1):30–3.
Jagannathan N, et al. Unilateral groin surgery in children: will the addition of an ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal nerve block enhance the duration of analgesia of a single-shot caudal block? Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(9):892–8.
Willschke H, et al. Ultrasonography for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(2):226–30.
Frigon C, et al. Bowel hematoma following an iliohypogastric-ilioinguinal nerve block. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(9):993–6.
Derrick JL, Aun CS. Transient femoral nerve palsy after ilioinguinal block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996;24(1):115.
Lander J, et al. Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278(24):2157–62.
Howard CR, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream (lidocaine and prilocaine) versus penile nerve block for pain relief during circumcision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1506–11.
Serour F, et al. Efficacy of EMLA cream prior to dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42(2):260–3.
Lehr VT, et al. Lidocaine 4% cream compared with lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% or dorsal penile block for circumcision. Am J Perinatol. 2005;22(5):231–7.
Serour F, Mori J, Barr J. Optimal regional anesthesia for circumcision. Anesth Analg. 1994;79(1):129–31.
Fontaine P, Dittberner D, Scheltema KE. The safety of dorsal penile nerve block for neonatal circumcision. J Fam Pract. 1994;39(3):243–8.
Lee JJ, Forrester P. EMLA for postoperative analgesia for day case circumcision in children. A comparison with dorsal nerve of penis block. Anaesthesia. 1992;47(12):1081–3.
Carlsson P, Svensson J. The duration of pain relief after penile block to boys undergoing circumcision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1984;28(4):432–4.
Soliman MG, Tremblay NA. Nerve block of the penis for postoperative pain relief in children. Anesth Analg. 1978;57(4):495–8.
Dalens B. Some current controversies in paediatric regional anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19(3):301–8.
Gul M, et al. Epinephrine injection associated scrotal skin necrosis. Case Rep Urol. 2015;2015:187831.
Johr M, Berger TM. Recent developments in paediatric regional anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004;17(3):211–5.
Faraoni D, et al. Does ultrasound guidance improve the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(10):931–6.
Boybeyi O, et al. Investigation of the effect of dorsal penile block to penile tissue. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(5):268 e1–5.
O’Sullivan MJ, Mislovic B, Alexander E. Dorsal penile nerve block for male pediatric circumcision—randomized comparison of ultrasound-guided vs anatomical landmark technique. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21(12):1214–8.
Beyaz SG, Tokgoz O, Tufek A. Regional anaesthesia in paediatric surgery: results of 2200 children. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61(8):782–6.
Stein AL, et al. Updates in pediatric regional anesthesia and its role in the treatment of acute pain in the ambulatory setting. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2017;21(2):11.
Newman PJ, Bushnell TG, Radford P. The effect of needle size and type in paediatric caudal analgesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 1996;6(6):459–61.
Goldschneider KR, Brandom BW. The incidence of tissue coring during the performance of caudal injection in children. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24(6):553–6.
Tsui BC, Berde CB. Caudal analgesia and anesthesia techniques in children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005;18(3):283–8.
Verghese ST, et al. Caudal anesthesia in children: effect of volume versus concentration of bupivacaine on blocking spermatic cord traction response during orchidopexy. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(5):1219–23.
Seefelder C. The caudal catheter in neonates: where are the restrictions? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002;15(3):343–8.
Gunter JB, Eng C. Thoracic epidural anesthesia via the caudal approach in children. Anesthesiology. 1992;76(6):935–8.
van Niekerk J, et al. Epidurography in premature infants. Anaesthesia. 1990;45(9):722–5.
Rasch DK, et al. Lumbar and thoracic epidural analgesia via the caudal approach for postoperative pain relief in infants and children. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37(3):359–62.
Bosenberg AT, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia via caudal route in infants. Anesthesiology. 1988;69(2):265–9.
Savolaine ER, et al. Anatomy of the human lumbar epidural space: new insights using CT-epidurography. Anesthesiology. 1988;68(2):217–20.
Blanco D, et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia by the caudal route in pediatric anesthesia: age is a limiting factor. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1994;41(4):214–6.
Taenzer AH, et al. Asleep versus awake: does it matter?: pediatric regional block complications by patient state: a report from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39(4):279–83.
Lonnqvist PA. Is ultrasound guidance mandatory when performing paediatric regional anaesthesia? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23(3):337–41.
Schultz-Machata AM, Weiss M, Becke K. What’s new in pediatric acute pain therapy? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27(3):316–22.
Verghese ST, Hannallah RS. Acute pain management in children. J Pain Res. 2010;3:105–23.
Lonnqvist PA, Morton NS. Paediatric day-case anaesthesia and pain control. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19(6):617–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Review Questions
Review Questions
-
1.
Opiate metabolic clearance rates in newborns are:
-
(a)
Increased when compared to older children
-
(b)
Unchanged when compared to older children or adults
-
(c)
Decreased when compared to adults
-
(d)
Decreased when compared to older children
-
(a)
-
2.
Complications of great auricular nerve blocks in children are:
-
(a)
Intravascular injection of the carotid artery
-
(b)
Intravascular injection of the internal jugular vein
-
(c)
Horner’s syndrome
-
(d)
All the above
-
(a)
-
3.
The use of interscalene blocks under general anesthesia are contraindicated in children
-
(a)
True
-
(b)
False
-
(a)
-
4.
Paravertebral blockade is indicated in children undergoing:
-
(a)
Renal surgery
-
(b)
Thoracic surgery
-
(c)
Cholecystectomy
-
(d)
Inguinal surgery
-
(e)
a, b, c
-
(f)
All the above
-
(a)
-
5.
Penile nerve blocks in children can be most effective with:
-
(a)
Application of topical ELMA
-
(b)
Subcutaneous ring block
-
(c)
Doral nerve block
-
(d)
Suprapubic nerve block
-
(a)
-
6.
Caudal nerve blocks in children:
-
(a)
Regional nerve block needles with echogenic features improve placement
-
(b)
Risk intraosseous injection of local anesthetic solution
-
(c)
Styletted needles may reduce risk of dermal plug into the caudal space
-
(d)
a and b
-
(e)
a and c
-
(f)
b and c
-
(g)
a, b, and c
-
(a)
-
7.
Extending caudal catheters into the lumbar or thoracic regions in newborns risk permanent neurologic sequelae.
-
(a)
True
-
(b)
False
-
(a)
-
8.
Complications of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks include:
-
(a)
Small bowel perforation
-
(b)
Colon perforation
-
(c)
Quadriceps motor weakness
-
(d)
All the above
-
(a)
Answers
-
1.
a
-
2.
d
-
3.
b
-
4.
f
-
5.
b
-
6.
f
-
7.
b
-
8.
d
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nossaman, V.E., Nossaman, B.D. (2018). Regional Anesthetic Techniques for the Pediatric Patient. In: Kaye, A., Urman, R., Vadivelu, N. (eds) Essentials of Regional Anesthesia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74838-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74838-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74837-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74838-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)